In recent years various workers?for example, Kurland (1952), Kurland and Westlund (1953), Alter, Allison, Talbert, and Kurland (1960), and Acheson, Bachrach, and Wright (1960) ?have shown that in the northern hemisphere multiple sclerosis becomes increasingly prevalent with increasing distance from the equator. No comparable series of prevalence studies has yet been reported from the southern hemisphere, but in Australasia mortality statistics and a postal survey suggested that there is a similar gradient with latitude (Sutherland, Tyrer, and Eadie, 1962), and studies of the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in various regions of the State of Queensland, Australia, also suggest that this gradient occurs (Sutherland, Tyrer, Eadie, Casey, and Kurland, 1965). A recent hypothesis suggested by Poskanzer, Schapira, and Miller (1963) to explain the geographical distribution is of interest. It is widely recognized that poliovirus infection is very common in infancy in areas with poor standards of sanitation (as in many parts of the tropics), yet paralytic polio myelitis is rare. Where there are higher standards of sanitation (in general, in the more temperate zones) poliovirus infection occurs later in life and paralytic disease is more frequent. Poskanzer et al. (1963) drew attention to a resemblance between the geographical distributions of multiple sclerosis and clinical poliomyelitis, and to other features which suggested that the two diseases had similar epidemiological patterns. They postulated that multiple sclerosis, like paralytic poliomyelitis, represents an occasional neurological manifestation of a wide spread subclinical enteric infection. For each disease, age at initial infection determines the chances of neurological involve ment. From other data Schapira, Poskanzer, and Miller (1963) inferred that there may be some 20 years' delay between the original enteric infection and the subsequent development of multiple sclerosis.
Read full abstract