PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 模拟计算平行样对流域生物信息流估算的影响 DOI: 10.5846/stxb202104271109 作者: 作者单位: 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 农业农村部财政专项"长江渔业资源与环境调查"(CJDC-2017-14);中国水产科学研究院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(2020JBF01,2020TD08) Simulating the impacts of parallel samples on the estimations of upstream-to-downstream watershed biological information flow Author: Affiliation: Fund Project: 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:流域生物信息流是流域生态学研究中的重要内容,是流域生态系统中的物质输移和能量输移过程的信息标记,是用eDNA技术调查评估河流水体中物种组成空间特征的基础。估算流域生物信息流是流域生态系统过程研究和eDNA技术调查评估河流水体中物种组成空间特征的关键。在有限的调查采样中,平行样的数量如何影响流域生物信息流的估算,尚待解答。基于随机抽样调查的基本原理,提出假设--采样数量不影响流域生物信息流估算结果的准确度,但会影响其精密度,然后通过问题简化转化和模拟计算,对该假设进行了检验。模拟计算结果显示,随着样点生物信息检出度(平行样数量)的增大,流域生物信息流估算结果会从偏小逐渐靠近流域生物信息流实际值,同时其99.9%置信区间也逐渐集中于流域生物信息流实际值。即样点生物信息检出度(平行样数量)对流域生物信息流估算的准确度和精密度均有影响。在实际调查研究过程中,建议先在所研究区域对平行样数量和样点生物信息检出度的关系进行预评估,然后基于流域生物信息流估算可信度目标在正式实施方案中经济有效地设置平行样,基于多平行样调查结果估算流域生物信息流,再根据各样点生物信息检出状况对流域生物信息流估算结果进行后验评估。 Abstract:Watershed biological information flow (WBIF) is defined as the path, processes and control of biological information transport, exchange, interaction and feedback among different spaces and systems along with watershed ecosystem processes, and could be partly described as the land-to-river and upstream-to-downstream bioinformation transportation (including organisms, nucleic acids, peptides and other biomarkers), which is driven by the hydrologic processes of watershed systems. The WBIF labels the transport of organic matter and energy. The WBIF integrates the ecological processes of environmental DNA (eDNA), including the origin, state, transport, and fate of eDNA, and makes it possible that the species composition in river system is monitored and assessed using eDNA. The WBIF estimation is the key for watershed ecosystem processes studying and riverine biodiversity monitoring. However, in practice, the parallel samples in each sampling site always are limited. And how parallel samples would impact WBIF estimation is unknown. Based on the principles of stochastic sampling survey, we hypothesized that parallel samples would not impact the accuracy of the WBIF estimation, but affect the precision of the WBIF estimation. Then, we transformed this hypothesis into a set of formulas and tested it with a series of analog computation. Results showed that the number of parallel samples (efficiency of detection) affected both the accuracy and precision of the WBIF estimation. The optimal WBIF estimation was less than the actual WBIF in any condition. Along with the increase of parallel samples (efficiency of detection), the optimal WBIF estimation gradually neared to the actual WBIF, the range of WBIF estimation gradually focused on the actual WBIF. In other words, more parallel samples (higher efficiency of detection) led higher accuracy and precision of the WBIF estimation. In addition, the actual WBIF affected both the accuracy and precision of the WBIF estimation too. Larger actual WBIF led higher accuracy and precision of the WBIF estimation. The relative relationship between the number of biological information types in upstream and downstream samples affected both the accuracy and precision of the WBIF estimation too. The accuracy and precision of WBIF estimation would be higher when the number of biological information types in upstream samples was more than those in downstream samples. So, we suggest that in the work of watershed ecosystem processes studying and riverine biodiversity monitoring, the relationship between parallel sample number and detection efficiency should be assessed, the suitable parallel sample number should be estimated based on the reliability target of WBIF estimation, the sampling program should be designed with suitable parallel samples, the WBIF should be estimated based on all parallel samples of each sampling site, at last the estimated results of WBIF should be re-evaluated according to the posterior probability of WBIF in different conditions. The current work provided the framework and methodology reference for the post-evaluation. 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献
Read full abstract