Par Domain Protein Research Articles

PER/TIM-mediated amplification, gene dosage effects and temperature compensation in an interlocking-feedback loop model of the Drosophila circadian clock

We have analysed a first-order kinetic representation of a interlocking-feedback loop model for the Drosophila circadian clock. In this model, the transcription factor Drosophila CLOCK (dCLK) which activates the clock genes period ( per) and timeless ( tim) is subjected to positive and negative regulations by the proteins ‘PAR Domain Protein 1’ (PDP1) and VRILLE (VRI), whose transcription is activated by dCLK. The PER/TIM complex binds to dCLK and in this way reduces the activity of dCLK. The results of our simulations suggest that the positive and negative feedback loops of Pdp1 and vri are essential for the overall oscillations. Although self sustained oscillations can be obtained without per/tim, the model shows that the PER/TIM complex plays an important role in amplification and stabilization of the oscillations generated by the Pdp1/ vri positive/negative feedback loops. We further show that in contrast to a single ( per/tim) negative feedback loop oscillator, the interlocking-feedback loop model can readily account for the effect of gene dosages of per, vri, and Pdp1 on the period length. Calculations of phase resetting on a temperature compensated version of the model shows good agreement with experimental phase response curves for high and low temperature pulses. Also, the partial losses of temperature compensation in per S and per L mutants can be described, which are related to decreased stabilities of the PER/TIM complex in per S and the stronger/more stable inhibitory complex between dCLK and PER/TIM in per L , respectively. The model shows (somewhat surprisingly) poor entrainment properties, especially under extended light/dark (L/D) cycles, which suggests that parts of the L/D tracking or sensing system are not well represented.

Vrille, Pdp1, and dClock Form a Second Feedback Loop in the Drosophila Circadian Clock

The Drosophila circadian clock consists of two interlocked transcriptional feedback loops. In one loop, dCLOCK/CYCLE activates period expression, and PERIOD protein then inhibits dCLOCK/CYCLE activity. dClock is also rhythmically transcribed, but its regulators are unknown. vrille (vri) and Par Domain Protein 1 ( Pdp1) encode related transcription factors whose expression is directly activated by dCLOCK/CYCLE. We show here that VRI and PDP1 proteins feed back and directly regulate dClock expression. Repression of dClock by VRI is separated from activation by PDP1 since VRI levels peak 3-6 hours before PDP1. Rhythmic vri transcription is required for molecular rhythms, and here we show that the clock stops in a Pdp1 null mutant , identifying Pdp1 as an essential clock gene. Thus, VRI and PDP1, together with dClock itself, comprise a second feedback loop in the Drosophila clock that gives rhythmic expression of dClock, and probably of other genes, to generate accurate circadian rhythms.

The Drosophila PAR Domain Protein 1 (Pdp1) Gene Encodes Multiple Differentially Expressed mRNAs and Proteins through the Use of Multiple Enhancers and Promoters

Transcription factors are often expressed at several times and in multiple tissues during development and regulate diverse sets of downstream target genes by varying their combinatorial interactions with other transcription factors. The Drosophila Tropomyosin I (TmI) gene is regulated by a complex of proteins within the enhancer that synergistically interacts with MEF2 to activate TmI transcription as muscle cells fuse and differentiate. One of the components of this complex is PDP1 (PAR domain protein 1), a basic leucine zipper transcription factor that is highly homologous to three vertebrate genes that are members of the PAR domain subfamily. We have isolated and describe here the structure of the Pdp1 gene. The Pdp1 gene is complex, containing at least four transcriptional start sites and producing at least six different mRNAs and PDP1 isoforms. Five of the PDP1 isoforms differ by the substitution or insertion of amino acids at or near the N-terminal of the protein. At least three of these alternately spliced transcripts are differentially expressed in different tissues of the developing embryo in which PDP1 expression is correlated with the differentiation of different cell types. A sixth isoform is produced by splicing out part of the PAR and basic DNA binding domains, and DNA binding and transient transfection experiments suggest that it functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of transcription. Furthermore, two enhancers have been identified within the gene that express in the somatic mesodermal precursors to body wall muscles and fat body and together direct expression in other tissues that closely mimics that of the endogenous gene. These results show that Pdp1 is widely expressed, including in muscle, fat, and gut precursors, and is likely involved in the transcriptional control of different developmental pathways through the use of differentially expressed PDP1 isoforms. Furthermore, the similarities between Pdp1 and the other PAR domain genes suggest that Pdp1 is the homologue of the vertebrate genes.

PDP1, a novel Drosophila PAR domain bZIP transcription factor expressed in developing mesoderm, endoderm and ectoderm, is a transcriptional regulator of somatic muscle genes.

In vertebrates, transcriptional control of skeletal muscle genes during differentiation is regulated by enhancers that direct the combinatorial binding and/or interaction of MEF2 and the bHLH MyoD family of myogenic factors. We have shown that Drosophila MEF2 plays a role similar to its vertebrate counterpart in the regulation of the Tropomyosin I gene in the development of Drosophila somatic muscles, however, unlike vertebrates, Drosophila MEF2 interacts with a muscle activator region that does not have binding sites for myogenic bHLH-like factors or any other known Drosophila transcription factors. We describe here the isolation and characterization of a component of the muscle activator region that we have named PDP1 (PAR domain protein 1). PDP1 is a novel transcription factor that is highly homologous to the PAR subfamily of mammalian bZIP transcription factors HLF, DBP and VBP/TEF. This is the first member of the PAR subfamily of bZIP transcription factors to be identified in Drosophila. We show that PDP1 is involved in regulating expression of the Tropomyosin I gene in somatic body-wall and pharyngeal muscles by binding to DNA sequences within the muscle activator that are required for activator function. Mutations that eliminate PDP1 binding eliminate muscle activator function and severely reduce expression of a muscle activator plus MEF2 mini-enhancer. These and previous results suggest that PDP1 may function as part of a larger protein/DNA complex that interacts with MEF2 to regulate transcription of Drosophila muscle genes. Furthermore, in addition to being expressed in the mesoderm that gives rise to the somatic muscles, PDP1 is also expressed in the mesodermal fat body, the developing midgut endoderm, the hindgut and Malpighian tubules, and the epidermis and central nervous system, suggesting that PDP1 is also involved in the terminal differentiation of these tissues.

Steroid hormone receptors in human salivary gland tumours.

Major salivary gland tumours were studied for the presence of hormone receptors for oestrogen and progesterone. Of the eight salivary gland tumours exhibiting varied histology, none showed high affinity receptors for oestrogen or progesterone. Salivary tissue from four patients with non-neoplastic salivary gland disease was also studied and found not to contain high affinity receptor sites. The absence of hormone receptors in these glands suggests that such tumours are not dependent on endocrine function.