Paper Diary Research Articles

Approach to activity engagement and differences in activity participation in chronic pain: A five-day observational study.

Activity pacing is one of the most widely endorsed interventions used by occupational therapists to assist clients to manage chronic pain conditions. It targets two behaviours that are thought to be maladaptive: activity avoidance and overactivity (activity engagement that severely aggravates pain). However, in more recent years, the potential for activity pacing to negatively impact activity participation has been recognised which deters habitually overactive individuals from adopting the self-management strategy. The main aim of this study was to evaluate if variances in activity participation can be explained by how individuals approach activity engagement when in pain. Sixty-eight adults with chronic pain completed a demographic questionnaire, the Pain and Activity Relations Questionnaire (PARQ), and recorded their participation in activities for five days using a paper diary. Two of the authors independently coded the recorded activities into one of three time-use categories: rest, productivity or leisure/social. A MANCOVA model was produced to examine differences in time use across four 'approach to activity engagement' categories which were determined by scores on the PARQ. A significant multivariate effect was found. Univariate comparisons revealed that 'overactives' (high overactivity, low avoidance) and 'pacers' (low overactivity, low avoidance) spent a similar amount of time resting over the five-day period. 'Overactives' spent the most amount of time on productive tasks and the least amount of time on social/leisure activities out of the four subgroups. Results suggest that activity pacing does not negatively impact on activity participation in chronic pain populations. 'Pacers' spent a similar amount of time resting, and had a slightly better balance between productive tasks and leisure/social activities, when compared to 'overactives'. The results of this study can be incorporated into patient education and highlight potential treatment avenues for individuals with chronic pain who are habitually overactive.

Quantity of opioids consumed following an emergency department visit for acute pain: a Canadian prospective cohort study

ObjectivesPrescription opioid diversion is a significant contributor to the opioid misuse epidemic. We examined the quantity of opioids consumed by emergency department (ED) discharged patients after treatment for an acute...

Anodal frontal tDCS for chronic cluster headache treatment: a proof-of-concept trial targeting the anterior cingulate cortex and searching for nociceptive correlates

BackgroundPercutaneous occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is effective in refractory chronic cluster headache (rCCH) patients. Responders to ONS differ from non-responders by greater glucose metabolism in subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC). We reasoned that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive approach, might be able to activate this area and thus improve rCCH patients. Our objective was to explore in a pilot trial the therapeutic potential of tDCS (anode at Fz, cathode over C7) and its possible effects on pain perception, frontal executive functions and mood in rCCH patients.MethodsThirty-one patients were asked to apply daily 20-min sessions of 2 mA tDCS for 4 or 8 weeks after a 1-month baseline. CH attacks were monitored with paper diaries. The primary outcome measure was change in weekly attacks between baseline and the last week of tDCS. Twenty-three patients were available for a modified ITT analysis, 21 for per-protocol analysis. We also explored treatment-related changes in thermal pain thresholds and nociceptive blink reflexes (nBR), frontal lobe function and mood scales.ResultsIn the per-protocol analysis there was a mean 35% decrease of attack frequency (p = 0.0001) with 41% of patients having a ≥ 50% decrease. Attack duration and intensity were also significantly reduced. After 8 weeks (n = 10), the 50% responder rate was 45%, but at follow-up 2 weeks after tDCS (n = 16) mean attack frequency had returned to baseline levels. The treatment effect was significant in patients with high baseline thermal pain thresholds in the forehead (n = 12), but not in those with low thresholds (n = 9). The Frontal Assessment Battery score increased after tDCS (p = 0.01), while there was no change in depression scores or nBR.ConclusiontDCS with a Fz-C7 montage may have a preventive effect in rCCH patients, especially those with low pain sensitivity, suggesting that a sham-controlled trial in cluster headache is worthwhile. Whether the therapeutic effect is due to activation of the sgACC that can in theory be reached by the electrical field, or of other prefrontal cortical areas remains to be determined.

Promoting physical activity in rural Australian adults using an online intervention

ObjectivesRural Australian adults are consistently identified as insufficiently active, likely due to challenges implementing community-based physical activity programs in rural settings. On-line strategies to promote physical activity may be particularly effective in rural settings where isolation and scarcity of qualified support are potential barriers. The Rural Environments and Community Health (REACH) study evaluated the effectiveness of an online-delivered walking intervention among South Australian rural adults. DesignRandomised controlled study design. MethodsA twelve-week intervention, with six- and twelve-month follow-up, was conducted. Participants (n=171; 50.6±12.5years), recruited through flyers, local newspapers and radio, were randomised to comparison or intervention groups and received a pedometer. The intervention group received access to the REACH website and personalised step goals based on ratings of perceived exertion and daily affect. The comparison group received a paper diary and generic step goals. Outcome measures were accelerometry-assessed sedentary, light (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) physical activity. Linear mixed models assessed changes over the intervention and follow-ups. ResultsSedentary time decreased, and LPA and MVPA increased in both groups across the intervention (p<0.05). The intervention group demonstrated a larger increase in LPA at six-month follow-up relative to comparison (p<0.05). Both groups decreased sedentary time, overall and in bouts ≥30min, between baseline and twelve-month follow-up (p<0.05). From baseline to twelve-month follow-up, MVPA (total min and bouts ≥10min) declined more in the comparison group than the intervention group (p<0.05). ConclusionWhile increased physical activity and decreased sedentary time were observed in both groups during the intervention period, maintenance was only observed for LPA at six-month follow-up in the intervention group. By twelve-month follow-up, post-intervention improvements had largely disappeared, suggesting that additional research is needed to identify ways to improve long-term adherence.

Efficacy and mechanism of sub-sensory sacral (optimised) neuromodulation in adults with faecal incontinence: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundFaecal incontinence (FI) is a substantial health problem with a prevalence of approximately 8% in community-dwelling populations. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is considered the first-line surgical treatment option in adults with FI in whom conservative therapies have failed. The clinical efficacy of SNM has never been rigorously determined in a trial setting and the underlying mechanism of action remains unclear.Methods/designThe design encompasses a multicentre, randomised, double-blind crossover trial and cohort follow-up study. Ninety participants will be randomised to one of two groups (SNM/SHAM or SHAM/SNM) in an allocation ratio of 1:1. The main inclusion criteria will be adults aged 18–75 years meeting Rome III and ICI definitions of FI, who have failed non-surgical treatments to the UK standard, who have a minimum of eight FI episodes in a 4-week screening period, and who are clinically suitable for SNM. The primary objective is to estimate the clinical efficacy of sub-sensory SNM vs. SHAM at 32 weeks based on the primary outcome of frequency of FI episodes using a 4-week paper diary, using mixed Poisson regression analysis on the intention-to-treat principle. The study is powered (0.9) to detect a 30% reduction in frequency of FI episodes between sub-sensory SNM and SHAM stimulation over a 32-week crossover period.Secondary objectives include: measurement of established and new clinical outcomes after 1 year of therapy using new (2017 published) optimised therapy (with standardised SNM-lead placement); validation of new electronic outcome measures (events) and a device to record them, and identification of potential biological effects of SNM on underlying anorectal afferent neuronal pathophysiology (hypothesis: SNM leads to increased frequency of perceived transient anal sphincter relaxations; improved conscious sensation of defaecatory urge and cortical/subcortical changes in afferent responses to anorectal electrical stimulation (main techniques: high-resolution anorectal manometry and magnetoencephalography).DiscussionThis trial will determine clinical effect size for sub-sensory chronic electrical stimulation of the sacral innervation. It will provide experimental evidence of modifiable afferent neurophysiology that may aid future patient selection as well as a basic understanding of the pathophysiology of FI.Trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN98760715. Registered on 15 September 2017.

Examination of Accuracy of Self-Reported Blood Glucose Using mHealth Data Collection

Introduction: Daily self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is essential for type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. Adherence to SMBG is often suboptimal during adolescence. SMBG paper diaries are often inaccurate compared to glucometer readings. The current study aimed to compare self-reported SMBG values gathered using ecological momentary assessment via smartphones to glucometer readings. Methods: Youth (n=54, 11-21 years, 59.3% male) with T1D received 3 text messages/day for 10 consecutive days containing REDCap surveys inquiring to SMBG values. SMBG values from glucometers were obtained during the same period. Based on a previously developed system, paired values were compared and categorized as accurate or discrepant. A discrepancy was categorized as: omission (i.e., glucometer reading with no self-reported SMBG value), addition (i.e., self-reported SMBG value with no glucometer reading), alteration (i.e., self-reported SMBG value different by &amp;gt;10 mg/dL from glucometer value), or digit transformation (i.e., 164 instead of 146). Self-reported values were categorized further to reflect whether patients reported a more clinically favorable or unfavorable profile. Results: A significant positive correlation was found between glucometer and self-reported SMBG values for all matched pairs (r=.628, p&amp;lt;.001). Out of 817 pairings, 39.3% of the self-reported values were congruent to glucometer readings and 60.7% were discrepant. Of the discrepant, 45% were alterations, 40.9% were additions, 13% were omissions, and .01% were digit transformations. Also, 54.5% of self-reported SMBG appeared clinically favorable, while 45.5% appeared clinically unfavorable. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with previous studies comparing paper SMBG diaries to glucometers in a pediatric population. Self-reported mHealth data is likely to produce discrepant SMBG values compared to glucometers. Providers are urged to use objective blood glucose devices for clinical decisions. Disclosure J. Warnick: None. S.C. Westen: None. A. Albanese-O'Neill: None. D. Schatz: None. M.J. Haller: None. D. Janicke: None.

Digital Technology: The Future Is Bright

Digital Technology: The Future Is Bright

Physiotherapy and Anterior Resection Syndrome (PARiS) trial: feasibility study protocol

IntroductionRectal cancer affects more than 600 patients per year in Wales, with a 5-year survival rate of around 60%. A recent report demonstrated that 19% of patients with bowel cancer...

Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography

Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography

Capturing Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure and Physical Activity: Feasibility Study and Comparison Between Self-Reports, Mobile Apps, Dosimeters, and Accelerometers.

BackgroundSkin cancer is the most prevalent cancer in Australia. Skin cancer prevention programs aim to reduce sun exposure and increase sun protection behaviors. Effectiveness is usually assessed through self-report.ObjectiveIt was the aim of this study to test the acceptance and validity of a newly developed ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure app, designed to reduce the data collection burden to research participants. Physical activity data was collected because a strong focus on sun avoidance may result in unhealthy reductions in physical activity. This paper provides lessons learned from collecting data from participants using paper diaries, a mobile app, dosimeters, and accelerometers for measuring end-points of UVR exposure and physical activity.MethodsTwo participant groups were recruited through social and traditional media campaigns 1) Group A—UVR Diaries and 2) Group B—Physical Activity. In Group A, nineteen participants wore an UVR dosimeter wristwatch (University of Canterbury, New Zealand) when outside for 7 days. They also recorded their sun exposure and physical activity levels using both 1) the UVR diary app and 2) a paper UVR diary. In Group B, 55 participants wore an accelerometer (Actigraph, Pensacola, FL, USA) for 14 days and completed the UVR diary app. Data from the UVR diary app were compared with UVR dosimeter wristwatch, accelerometer, and paper UVR diary data. Cohen kappa coefficient score was used to determine if there was agreement between categorical variables for different UVR data collection methods and Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine agreement between continuous accelerometer data and app-collected self-report physical activity.ResultsThe mean age of participants in Groups A (n=19) and B (n=55) was 29.3 and 25.4 years, and 63% (12/19) and 75% (41/55) were females, respectively. Self-reported sun exposure data in the UVR app correlated highly with UVR dosimetry (κ=0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.00, P<.001). Correlation between self-reported UVR app and accelerometer-collected moderate to vigorous physical activity data was low (ρ=0.23, P=.10), while agreement for low-intensity physical activity was significantly different (ρ=-0.49, P<.001). Seventy-nine percent of participants preferred the app over the paper diary for daily self-report of UVR exposure and physical activity.ConclusionsThis feasibility study highlights self-report using an UVR app can reliably collect personal UVR exposure, but further improvements are required before the app can also be used to collect physical activity data.

A Behavioral Lifestyle Intervention Enhanced With Multiple-Behavior Self-Monitoring Using Mobile and Connected Tools for Underserved Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Comorbid Overweight or Obesity: Pilot Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

BackgroundSelf-monitoring is a cornerstone of behavioral lifestyle interventions for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mobile technology has the potential to improve adherence to self-monitoring and patient outcomes. However, no study has tested the use of a smartphone to facilitate self-monitoring in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in the underserved community.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of and compare preliminary efficacy of a behavioral lifestyle intervention using smartphone- or paper-based self-monitoring of multiple behaviors on weight loss and glycemic control in a sample of overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in underserved communities.MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a behavioral lifestyle intervention. Overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited from an underserved minority community health center in Houston, Texas. They were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: (1) behavior intervention with smartphone-based self-monitoring, (2) behavior intervention with paper diary-based self-monitoring, and (3) usual care group. Both the mobile and paper groups received a total of 11 face-to-face group sessions in a 6-month intervention. The mobile group received an Android-based smartphone with 2 apps loaded to help them record their diet, physical activity, weight, and blood glucose, along with a connected glucometer, whereas the paper group used paper diaries for these recordings. Primary outcomes of the study included percentage weight loss and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) changes over 6 months.ResultsA total of 26 patients were enrolled: 11 in the mobile group, 9 in the paper group, and 6 in the control group. We had 92% (24/26) retention rate at 6 months. The sample is predominantly African Americans with an average age of 56.4 years and body mass index of 38.1. Participants lost an average of 2.73% (mobile group) and 0.13% (paper group) weight at 6 months, whereas the control group had an average 0.49% weight gain. Their HbA1c changed from 8% to 7 % in mobile group, 10% to 9% in paper group, and maintained at 9% for the control group. We found a significant difference on HbA1c at 6 months among the 3 groups (P=.01). We did not find statistical group significance on percentage weight loss (P=.20) and HbA1c changes (P=.44) overtime; however, we found a large effect size of 0.40 for weight loss and a medium effect size of 0.28 for glycemic control.ConclusionsDelivering a simplified behavioral lifestyle intervention using mobile health–based self-monitoring in an underserved community is feasible and acceptable and shows higher preliminary efficacy, as compared with paper-based self-monitoring. A full-scale randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm the findings in this pilot study.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02858648; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02858648 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ySidjmT7)

Comparing Diet and Exercise Monitoring Using Smartphone App and Paper Diary: A Two-Phase Intervention Study.

BackgroundThere is increasing recognition that personalized approaches may be more effective in helping people establish healthier eating patterns and exercise more, and that this approach may be particularly effective in adolescents.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the use of a smartphone app (FoodWiz2) in supporting healthy lifestyle choices in adolescence.MethodsParticipants (N=34: 11 male, 23 female) aged 16-19 years in full- or part-time education were recruited from sixth form colleges, schools, and other further education establishments in Norfolk and Suffolk, United Kingdom, between February and May 2015. Participants recorded food intake and exercise using a paper diary for 4-5 weeks and then used the app for the same duration. Initial nutrition education and general support were provided during the paper diary use, but the app included personalized messages sent in response to app activity. At the end of each study phase, participants completed an online questionnaire to describe their experience of using the paper diary and app.ResultsRecord completion declined throughout the study, possibly affected by examination pressure. Food intake data showed increased fruit consumption and significantly reduced consumption of chocolate snacks (P=.01) and fizzy drinks (P=.002) among participants using the app. Questionnaire responses indicated that the app was generally preferred to the paper diary, in particular, the app was seen as less boring to use (P=.03) and more acceptable in social settings (P<.001).ConclusionsThis app-based approach has shown the potential for a more effective approach to improving adolescent diet and exercise levels.

Open-Access Electronic Diary for Motor Fluctuation and Dyskinesia Evaluation in Parkinson Disease: Comparison With Paper Diary.

To determine the utility of an electronic diary for registering motor fluctuations and dyskinesia in Parkinson disease (PD). Free, open-access touch screen software suitable for Android 4.4 or higher, with medication alarms, adjustable intervals, and medication dose settings was developed to evaluate ON-OFF periods and dyskinesia. Prospective evaluation included a first phase conducted to make adjustments concerning motor limitations when using the tablet, as well as for proper motor complication identification, and a second phase of 3 days of use at home with a prior diary training session comparing a modified paper version of Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventional Therapies in PD and the electronic diary. All patients correctly identified ON-OFF periods and dyskinesia. Rater/patient matching ON-OFF fluctuations ranged between 94% and 100% for evaluations of different motor states. Dyskinesia matching percentage was 100% for patients with dyskinesia interfering with activities of daily living and 88% for those who reported no-interference. No significant differences between paper and electronic diaries were identified when reporting ON-OFF motor states or in the number of errors when filling the diaries. This electronic motor diary proved to be reliable for ON-OFF state and dyskinesia identification and classification. However, no advantage to paper diary has been observed in terms of number of erroneous entries. Based on these results, to improve home motor fluctuations, detection efforts should be directed toward the development of automatic wearable devices rather than digital versions of current available ON-OFF diaries.

Supplemental Material for Should Participants be Left to their Own Devices? Comparing Paper and Smartphone Diaries in Psychological Research

Supplemental Material for Should Participants be Left to their Own Devices? Comparing Paper and Smartphone Diaries in Psychological Research

Detecting Acute Otitis Media Symptom Episodes Using a Mobile App: Cohort Study.

BackgroundPopulation cohort studies are useful to study infectious diseases episodes not attended by health care services, but conventional paper diaries and questionnaires to capture cases are prone to noncompliance and recall bias. Use of smart technology in this setting may improve case finding.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to validate an interactive mobile app for monitoring occurrence of acute infectious diseases episodes in individuals, independent of health care seeking, using acute otitis media (AOM) symptom episodes in infants as a case study. We were interested in determining participant compliance and app performance in detecting and ascertaining (parent-reported) AOM symptom episodes with this novel tool compared with traditional methods used for monitoring study participants.MethodsWe tested the InfectieApp research app to detect AOM symptom episodes. In 2013, we followed 155 children aged 0 to 3 years for 4 months. Parents recorded the presence of AOM symptoms in a paper diary for 4 consecutive months and completed additional disease questionnaires when AOM symptoms were present. In 2015 in a similar cohort of 69 children, parents used an AOM diary and questionnaire app instead.ResultsDuring conventional and app-based recording, 93.13% (17,244/18,516) and 94.56% (7438/7866) of symptom diaries were returned, respectively, and at least one symptom was recorded for 32.50% (n=5606) and 43.99% (n=3272) of diary days (P<.01). The incidence of AOM symptom episodes was 605 and 835 per 1000 child-years, respectively. Disease questionnaires were completed for 59% (17/29) of episodes when participants were using conventional recording, compared with 100% (18/18) for app-based recording.ConclusionsThe use of the study’s smart diary app improved AOM case finding and disease questionnaire completeness. For common infectious diseases that often remain undetected by health care services, use of this technology can substantially improve the accurateness of disease burden estimates.

Mobile Application vs Paper Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart to Track Menses in Young Women: A Randomized Cross-over Design

Study ObjectiveHeavy menstrual bleeding is a common symptom reported by approximately 30% of women. The Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score is often used to quantify severity of menstrual bleeding. However, the traditional PBAC paper diary might be subject to recall bias and compliance issues, especially in adolescents. We developed a mobile application (app) version of the PBAC score and evaluated patient satisfaction and compliance with app reporting vs paper reporting. Design, Setting, Participants, Interventions, and Main Outcome MeasuresThis study was a randomized cross-over study of 25 postmenarchal female adolescents and young women ages 13-21 years. Participants agreed to track bleeding in 2 consecutive menstrual cycles and were randomized to use the PBAC paper diary or mobile app format first. At the end of each cycle, a satisfaction survey and system usability scale (app only) was used to assess the acceptability of the format used. ResultsTwenty-five participants had a median age of 15 years. Cross-over analysis showed that satisfaction level was significantly higher for the app (P < .001). Twenty of 25 (80%) participants preferred the app over the paper diary. For the app, 20 of 25 participants (80%) had high compliance for reporting bleeding, with a mean of 2 app entries per day. Participants' PBAC scores did not vary significantly between the paper diary (median, 95) and mobile app (median, 114). All paper diaries met definition for high compliance. There was no significant period or carryover effect. ConclusionThis study showed that a PBAC app compared with the paper diary was the preferred method of recording menstrual bleeding in adolescents and showed feasibility as a research data collection tool.

Who\u2019s holding the baby? A prospective diary study of the contact patterns of mothers with an infant

BackgroundModels of infectious disease are increasingly utilising empirical contact data to quantify the number of potentially infectious contacts between age groups. While a growing body of data is being collected on contact patterns across many populations, less attention has been paid to the social contacts of young infants. We collected information on the social contacts of primary carers of young infants and investigated their potential for use as a proxy for contacts made by their infant.MethodsWe recruited primary carers of infants under one year of age residing in two geographically, demographically and socioeconomically distinct local government areas of Melbourne, Australia — Boroondara and Hume — including a sub-group of Turkish-speaking participants. Participants recorded their own contacts in a paper diary and noted whether their infant was present or absent. Information collected included times at an address; description of location; and details on people contacted at the location. Descriptive summary measures and distributions of contacts by location type, intensity, day of contact and by age are reported.ResultsOf the 226 participants recruited, 220 completed diaries were returned. Participant contact patterns were similar across all groups, with respect to the types of locations, intensity and day of contact, with some variation in the number of unique daily contacts. The infant was present at around 85% of locations at which the primary carer contacted other individuals. The majority of contacts occurring when the infant was present were in Own Home (32%), Retail and Hospitality (18%) and Transport (18%) settings. The mean daily number of unique contacts by infants was estimated as 9.1, 8.7 and 6.5 in Boroondara, Hume (English) and Hume (Turkish), respectively, with a similar age distribution across each of our surveyed groups.ConclusionsOur demonstration that contact patterns of mothers with infants are reasonably robust to socioeconomic and cultural differences is a step forward in modelling infectious disease transmission. With infants spending most of their time in the company of their mother, contact patterns of mothers are a useful proxy measure of infant contact patterns. The age distribution of contacts made by infants estimated in this study may be used to supplement population-wide contact information commonly used in infectious disease transmission models.

Abstract P374: Smartphone Application for Blood Pressure Monitoring: Whitings vs MobileRapid (Pic S)

HBPM has a limits: the poor compliance with the correct method and the compilation of the paper diary. Telemonitoring of arterial pressure - wants to overcome these predetermined limits. The goal of telemonitoring of the pressure is to improve the management of the hypertensive condition. Aim of our study: to evaluate the perception of qualitative parameters for the extensive use of blood pressure telemonitoring such as: Eases, clarity of the display, speed, noise, practicality and reliability, comparing two different oscillometric devices for blood pressure measurement with Bluetooth connectivity to a smartphone app with the ability to send the data press directly to its reference center : MobileRapid (A), Whitings (B). Materials and Methods: We have enrolled 60 hypertensive patients, 30 M and 30 F with an average age of 40.5± 9.74 y. All patients were asked to carry out the automated blood pressure with the two devices. Each patient was given a questionnaire that investigated the perception of subjective parameters by the patient of a device in comparison to the other (A vs C) and the patient’s orientation about the possibility of connecting the pressure measuring device to a specific app to send the data. Results: 50 out of 60 pts (83.33%)of the sample perceived overall easier to use the device A against 9 out of 60 (15%) C (p &lt;0.0001) 43 out 60 (71.67%) found it clearer (p &lt;0.0001), 31 out of 60 (51.67%) faster (p = 0.0078), while for the silent parameter 25 out of 60 (41.67%) of patients preferred C and for 28 out of 60 (46.67%) there was no No difference (p = 0.0016). Device A appeared to be more practical in 45 out of 60 (75%) patients compared to 20% for Device C (12 pts out of 60) (p &lt;0.0001), and in 46 out of 60 (76.67%) of cases worldwide, MobileRapid appeared more reliable than Whitings (p &lt;0.0001). 98% of the sample (58 pts) is interested in having a dedicated app. Conclusions: The MobileRapid device is perceived reliable, faster than Whitings. The good thing is that our sample, albeit not numerically elevated, has shown almost total interest in being ’connected’ with your doctor as well as constantly monitoring your pressure values.

Impact of a workplace \u2018sit less, move more\u2019 program on efficiency-related outcomes of office employees

BackgroundFew studies have examined the impact of ‘sit less, move more’ interventions on workplace performance. This study assessed the short and mid-term impacts of and patterns of change within, a 19-week workplace web-based intervention (Walk@WorkSpain; W@WS; 2010–11) on employees´ presenteeism, mental well-being and lost work performance.MethodsA site randomised control trial recruited employees at six Spanish university campuses (n = 264; 42 ± 10 years; 171 female), assigned by worksite and campus to an Intervention (IG; used W@WS; n = 129; 87 female) or an active Comparison group (A-CG; pedometer, paper diary and self-reported sitting time; n = 135; 84 female). A linear mixed model assessed changes between the baseline, ramping (8 weeks), maintenance (11 weeks) and follow-up (two months) phases for the IG versus A-CG on (i) % of lost work productivity (Work Limitations Questionnaire; WLQ); (ii) three scales for presenteeism (WLQ) assessing difficulty meeting scheduling demands (Time), performing cognitive and inter-personal tasks (Mental-Interpersonal) and decrements in meeting the quantity, quality and timeliness of completed work (Output); and (iii) mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale). T-tests assessed differences between groups for changes on the main outcomes. In the IG, a multivariate logistic regression model identified patterns of response according to baseline socio-demographic variables, physical activity and sitting time.ResultsThere was a significant 2 (group) × 2 (program time points) interaction for the Time (F [3]=8.69, p = 0.005), Mental-Interpersonal (F [3]=10.01, p = 0.0185), Output scales for presenteeism (F [3]=8.56, p = 0.0357), and for % of lost work performance (F [3]=10.31, p = 0.0161). Presenteeism and lost performance rose significantly in both groups across all study time points; after baseline performance was consistently better in the IG than in the A-CG. Better performance was linked to employees being more active (Time, p = 0.041) and younger (Mental-interpersonal, p = 0.057; Output, p = 0.017). Higher total sitting time during nonworking days (Mental-interpersonal, p = 0.019) and lower sitting time during workdays (WLQ Index, p = 0.013) also improved performance.ConclusionVersus an active comparison condition, a ‘sit less, move more` workplace intervention effectively reduced an array of markers of lost workday productivity.Trial registrationNCT02960750; Date of registration: 07/11/2016.

LO10: Quantity of opioid to prescribe for acute pain to limit misuse after emergency department discharge

Introduction: A 2008 survey found that 1.9% of the entire US population was using prescription pain medication non-medically and that 56% obtained them from a friend or relatives. Diversion of pain medication may occur when a portion of the prescription is unused for pain relief after an ED visit. We hypothesized that at least 10 pills (~40%) of an opioid prescription 2 weeks after an ED visit, will not be consumed and become available for potential misuse. Objective: Determine the quantity of unused opioids pills for common acute pain diagnoses, 2 weeks after an ED visit for acute pain. Methods: Prospective observational cohort study of consecutive ED patients from a tertiary academic urban hospital with 60,000 ED visits annually. Inclusion criteria: aged ≥18 years, acute pain conditions present ≤2 weeks, pain intensity at triage of ≥4 (on a 0-10 numeric rating scale; NRS), and discharged with a new opioid prescription. ED physicians identified (24/7) eligible patients. They recorded the pain complaint/location, the final diagnosis, the quantity and type of prescribed pain medication. Discharged patients completed paper or electronic 14-day diary (REDCap database) to document their pain medication consumption. As a mitigation strategy, they were also contacted by phone at 2 weeks for the same information. A paired t-test was used to test the difference between the amounts of opioids prescribed and consumed. Results: 350 patients were recruited. Mean age 50 (SD ±16) and 54.2% were men. Painful diagnosis: fracture (18.2%), acute back pain (15.3%), renal colic (15.3%), Sprain (excluding back/neck pain) (6.9%), Contusion (6.4%), acute neck pain (5.8%), abdominal pain (4.9%), and other (27.2%). Opioids prescribed: oxycodone (47%), morphine (37%) and hydromorphone (16%). Means quantity of opioid pills prescribed: 24 (IC95%: 23-26). Filled opioid prescription: 92%. Means quantity of opioid pills consumed: 8 (IC95%: 7-9). Means quantity of unused opioids pills: 16. Opioid pills available for misuse in our cohort: 5,600 pills. Conclusion: After an ED visit for acute pain a significant portion of opioids prescribed is unused and available for misuse. A large pragmatic study should be done to confirm that an opioid prescription strategy based on our results will limit unused opioid pills while maintaining pain relief.