Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:771–8. Ingenito EP, Berger RL, Henderson AC, et al. Comments: In this study, the investigators use a novel procedure to successfully achieve bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) in a sheep model of emphysema. The basic goal was to initiate a remodeling process in the target areas of the lung so that the damaged and hyperinflated lung is remodeled and transformed into a contracted scar. The authors used a biologic approach to achieve this goal. The principle was to use an enzymatic primer solution to remove epithelial cells from the target area and to provide a modified hydrogel scaffold containing glycosaminoglycans and a synthetic polyamine to promote fibroblast attachment and collagen synthesis. First, the investigators developed an animal model for advanced homogeneous emphysema. This was achieved by making sheep inhale papain under general anesthesia. The BLVR procedure was apparently performed 2 weeks after papain administration. First, 10 mL of Bistech Primer Reagent (0.25% trypsin in buffer–phosphate saline) was introduced into the selected segmental bronchus through the working channel. After leaving it in place for 2 minutes, suction was applied to remove as much residual solution as possible. Then, 10 mL of Bistech Washout Solution containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum was introduced in the same segment to neutralize the residual primer. Suction was again applied after 2 minutes of dwell-time. Lastly, 10 mL of fibrin hydrogel suspension and 1 mL of thrombin crosslinker were delivered simultaneously at this site using a double-lumen catheter system. The procedure was repeated at 6 different treatment sites. The individual treatment needed 5 to 7 minutes and the entire BLVR procedure required 30 to 45 minutes. The investigators performed detailed respiratory physiology parameters and chest computed tomography scans immediately before and 3 and 9 weeks after the BLVR procedure. After 9 weeks, the animals were killed and autopsy was performed. The study involved 6 sheep, all of which displayed hyperinflation, a decrease in elastic recoil pressure, a decrease in diffusion capacity, and an increase in airway resistance after papain administration. The BLVR was well tolerated and none of the animals developed acute complications such as hypoxemia, hemoptysis, bronchospasm, or respiratory distress. Three weeks post-BLVR procedure, the respiratory physiological parameters showed a reduction in TLC from 3.63 ± 0.42 to 3.01 ± 0.32 L (P = 0.02), FRC from 2.02 ± 0.27 to 1.66 ± 0.37 L (P = 0.05), and RV from 1.43 ± 0.48 to 0.63 ± 0.17 L (P = 0.002). Elastic recoil pressure improved after BLVR. The diffusion capacity showed a trend toward improvement post-BLVR. The benefits in respiratory physiology parameters were maintained at 9 weeks. Serial computed tomography scans showed collapse, loss of volume, and development of localized linear scars in the treatment areas. Autopsy findings confirmed well-demarcated scar tissue with extensive collagen deposition, fibroblasts, and mononuclear cells. There was no suggestion of pneumonia, granuloma, tissue necrosis, or abscess formation. The results of this study were very impressive. Desired goals were achieved in experimental animals with a relatively short procedure without needing surgery or introduction of complicated mechanical prosthesis. Using a similar experimental model of emphysema, the same group of investigators has attempted BLVR through mechanical sealing of bronchi with fibrin (Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:295–301). Although 55% of experimental animals developed desired lung collapse and focal scarring, sterile abscesses developed in 15% of animals in that study. The new approach based on a bioengineering principle appears to be safer and more effective than their prior method. Several limitations of this study should be noted. First, the BLVR procedure was performed within a short time after inducing experimental emphysema. Without a controlled group, the possibility that residual inflammatory changes from recent papain administration confounded the results of BLVR cannot be ruled out. Whether equally impressive results can be achieved in longstanding and established emphysema remains to be seen. Second, an animal experiment cannot establish that improvement in respiratory mechanics will translate into benefits in clinically relevant end points such as mortality, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Lastly, the long-term safety of inducing scar tissue in the lung needs to be established. The main concern is the risk of future development of scar carcinoma. Is this technique ready for use in human subjects? The procedure appears to be simple and free of any major short-term complications in animal subjects. However, the safety of the procedure needs to be established in human subjects in phase I studies. There always remains a possibility that human response could differ from that of sheep. Nevertheless, given the disease burden worldwide and limited benefits of current medical and surgical therapy, it seems appropriate to start exploring novel approaches in human subjects such as that used in the current study.
Read full abstract