Pancreaticoduodenectomy In Patients Research Articles

Impact of hypoalbuminemia on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP retrospective cohort analysis of 25,848 patients.

Efforts to preoperatively risk stratify and optimize patients before pancreaticoduodenectomy continue to improve outcomes. This study aims to determine the impact of hypoalbuminemia on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy and outline optimal hypoalbuminemia cut-off values in this population. The ACS-NSQIP (2016-2021) database was used to extract patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, comparing those with hypoalbuminemia (< 3.0g/L) to those with normal albumin. Demographics and 30-day outcomes were compared. Multivariable modeling evaluated factors including hypoalbuminemia to characterize their independent effect on serious complications, and mortality. Optimal albumin cut-offs for serious complications and mortality were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. We evaluated 25,848 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients with 2712 (10.5%) having preoperative hypoalbuminemia. Patients with hypoalbuminemia were older (68.2 vs. 65.1; p < 0.0001), and were significantly more likely to be ASA class 4 or higher (13.9% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.0001). Patients with hypoalbuminemia had significantly more 30-day complications and after controlling for comorbidities hypoalbuminemia remained a significant independent factor associated with 30-day serious complications (OR 1.80, p < 0.0001) but not mortality (OR 1.37, p = 0.152). Hypoalbuminemia plays a significant role in 30-day morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Preoperative albumin may serve as a useful marker for risk stratification and optimization.

Risk factors associated with intraoperative persistent hypotension in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Intraoperative persistent hypotension (IPH) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is linked to adverse postoperative outcomes, yet its risk factors remain unclear. To clarify the risk factors associated with IPH during PD, ensuring patient safety in the perioperative period. A retrospective analysis of patient records from January 2018 to December 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University identified factors associated with IPH in PD. These factors included age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, comorbidities, medication history, operation duration, fluid balance, blood loss, urine output, and blood gas parameters. IPH was defined as sustained mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg, requiring prolonged deoxyepinephrine infusion for > 30 min despite additional deoxyepinephrine and fluid treatments. Among 1596 PD patients, 661 (41.42%) experienced IPH. Multivariate logistic regression identified key risk factors: increased age [odds ratio (OR): 1.20 per decade, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.33] (P < 0.001), longer surgery duration (OR: 1.15 per additional hour, 95%CI: 1.05-1.26) (P < 0.01), and greater blood loss (OR: 1.18 per 250-mL increment, 95%CI: 1.06-1.32) (P < 0.01). A novel finding was the association of arterial blood Ca2+ < 1.05 mmol/L with IPH (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.65-2.50) (P < 0.001). IPH during PD is independently associated with older age, prolonged surgery, increased blood loss, and lower plasma Ca2+.

Unnecessary Pancreatic Resection for Non-cancerous Lesions Masquerading as Pancreatic and Peri-ampullary Cancers: An Inevitable Circumstance

Background: Pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancers are deadly and require surgery. Some non-cancerous conditions, especially those that do not require surgery, have imaging findings similar to pancreatic and peri-ampullary carcinoma. The proportion of non-cancerous lesions that undergo pancreatic resection for suspected pancreatic or peri-ampullary cancer is scarce in eastern countries, especially when bile duct tumors are common. This study examined the proportion of non-cancerous lesions removed during pancreatic resection for suspected pancreatic or peri-ampullary cancer. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study included January 2013–December 2017. We investigated the medical and pathological data of 148 pancreatic resection patients at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University. Results: Nine patients (6.1%) had postoperative pathology diagnoses that did not require surgery. The discordant group was significantly larger among distal pancreatectomy or enucleation patients (15%, 4/27) than pancreaticoduodenectomy patients (4.1%, 5/121). The concordant and discordant groups had similar clinical features for pancreaticoduodenectomy, except for gender (p=0.031). There were no clinical differences between concordant and discordant patients after distal pancreatectomy or enucleation. Conclusion: Pancreatic excision for non-cancerous conditions may be inevitable. Western and Eastern countries have different non-cancerous disorders that mimic pancreatic or peri-ampullary cancer. Western countries had more pancreatic conditions, especially inflammatory ones, but Eastern countries had more ampullary and bile duct conditions in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients and benign cystic lesions in distal pancreatectomy patients.

Linking factors to incisional hernia following pancreatic surgery: a 14-year retrospective analysis.

Incisional hernias (IH) are a significant postoperative complication with profound implications for patient morbidity and healthcare costs. The relationship between IH and perioperative factors in pancreatic surgery,with particular attention to preoperative biliary stents and pancreatic fistulasrequires further exploration. This retrospective observational study examined adult patients who underwent open pancreatic surgeries via midline incision at a high-volume tertiary hepatopancreatobiliary center from January 2008 to December 2021. The study focused on IH incidence and associated risk factors, with particular attention to preoperative biliary stents and pancreatic fistulas. In a cohort of 620 individuals undergoing pancreatic surgery, 351 had open surgery with at least one-year follow-up. Within a median follow-up of 794days (IQR 1694-537), the overall incidence of IH was 17.38%. The highest frequency of IH was observed among patients who had a Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Significant predictors for the development of IH within the entire study population in a multivariable analysis included perioperative biliary stenting (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.06-3.96; p = 0.03), increased age at diagnosis (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.06-3.96; p = 0.01), and BMI (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.15; p = 0.01). In the subset of patients who underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), although the presence of biliary stents was associated with a heightened occurrence of SSIs, it did not demonstrate a direct correlation with an increased incidence of incisional hernias (IH). The development of pancreatic fistulas did not show a significant correlation with IH in either the Distal Pancreatectomy with Splenectomy (DPS) or the PD patient groups. The study underscores a notable association between biliary stent placement and increased IH risk after PD, mediated by elevated SSI incidence. Pancreatic fistulas were not directly correlated with IH in the studied cohorts. Further research is necessary to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.

Approach to postpancreatectomy care Impacts outcomes: Retrospective Validation of the PORSCH trial

BackgroundIn the recent PORSCH trial, a three-part postpancreatectomy care algorithm was employed with a near 50 ​% reduction in mortality. We hypothesized that clinical care congruent with this protocol would correlate with better outcomes in our patients. MethodsReal-world postoperative care was compared to the pathway described by the PORSCH trial and patients were assigned into groups based on congruence with its recommendations. The primary composite outcome (PCO) consisted of 90-day mortality, organ failure, and interventions for bleeding. ResultsOf 289 patients, care of 12 ​% was entirely congruent with the PORSCH algorithm. The PCO was recorded in 9 ​% of the PORSCH care group, 8 ​% of the Partial-PORSCH care group, and 19 ​% of the Non-PORSCH care group (p ​= ​0.044). Adverse outcomes were highest when pancreaticoduodenectomy patients received care incongruent with the algorithm's CT imaging recommendations. ConclusionsThese results add external validity to the principles of clinical care underlying the PORSCH algorithm.

Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an Italian survey.

Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain (IPD) use in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still controversial. A survey was designed to investigate surgeons' use of IPD in PD patients through 23 questions and one clinical vignette. For the clinical scenario, respondents were asked to report their regret of omission and commission regarding the use of IPD elicited on a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were applied. One hundred three (97.2%) respondents confirmed using at least two IPDs. The median regret due to the omission of IPD was 84 (67-100, IQR). The median regret due to the commission of IPD was 10 (3.5-20, IQR). The CR-POPF probability threshold at which drainage omission was the less regrettable choice was 3% (1-50, IQR). The threshold was lower for those surgeons who performed minimally invasive PD (P = 0.048), adopted late removal (P = 0.002), perceived FRS able to predict the risk (P = 0.006), and IPD able to avoid relaparotomy P = 0.036). Drain management policies after PD remain heterogeneous among surgeons. The regret model suggested that IPD omission could be performed in low-risk patients.

Pharmacokinetics of apixaban in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PAP-UP).

The impact of pancreaticoduodenectomy on absorption of drugs in the duodenum remains largely unknown. We aim to characterize the pharmacokinetics of apixaban in patients who had previously undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. A single 10-mg dose of apixaban was administered to 4 volunteers who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at least 6 months prior. The maximum plasma apixaban concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration time-curve (AUC0-24, AUC0-inf) were compared against healthy historical control subjects (N = 12). Geometric mean ratios (GMR) with 90% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for determination of comparative bioequivalence. In pancreaticoduodenectomy patients, AUC0-24 and AUC0-inf were 1,861 and 2,080 ng×h/mL, respectively. The GMRs of AUC0-24 and AUC0-inf between study subjects and healthy controls were 1.27 (90% CI 0.88 - 1.83) and 1.18 (90% CI 0.82 - 1.72). The mean Cmax of apixaban was 201 ng/mL (SD 15.6) occurring at a median tmax of 3.25 hours (range 2.5 - 4 hours). The GMR of Cmax between study subjects and healthy controls was 1.12 (90% CI 0.77 - 1.63). The pharmacokinetic characteristics of apixaban in subjects who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy are not significantly different from those of healthy controls. Though the sample size of this study is small, results suggest that no change to apixaban dose regimen is needed in patients who have had a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Impact of Straight Stomach Reconstruction on Delayed Gastric Emptying and Nutritional Recovery After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified reconstruction technique-anchored straight stomach reconstruction-in reducing the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and its impact on postoperative nutritional recovery. A case series analysis of 125 consecutive PD patients was conducted: 104 of them had undergone anchored straight stomach reconstruction (SSR group) and the remaining 21 without (Non-SSR group). The incidence of DGE and the change in postoperative nutritional status (body weight and serum albumin level during 12months post-surgery) were compared. The incidence of DGE in the SSR group (13%) was significantly lower than that in the Non-SSR group (33%) (P = .018); further the significant DGE (grade B or C) was only 5%. Comparison of nutritional status showed that SSR facilitated a prompt recovery of body weight and serum albumin level at 6months after PD. At 12months after surgery, body weight gain was significantly better in the SSR group than in the Non-SSR group (P = .006), and albumin level tended to be higher in the SSR group (P = .071). Straight stomach reconstruction is able to reduce DGE in patients after PD and also improves their postoperative nutritional recovery.

The impact of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative outcomes: an insight from Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in elderly pancreaticoduodenectomy patients

BackgroundMalnutrition is not uncommon among the elderly undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and is related to increased complications. Previous studies have shown that the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) predicts outcomes in various populations. Nevertheless, the research exploring the correlation between GNRI and postoperative outcomes in PD is scarce. This study aimed to investigate the preoperative malnutrition, as measured by GNRI, on outcomes in elderly patients undergoing PD.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective analysis enrolled 144 elderly patients underwent PD for periampullary tumors from November 2016 to December 2021. Patients were stratified based on the GNRI value: high/moderate nutrition risk (GNRI ≤ 92, N = 54), low nutrition risk (92 < GNRI ≤ 98, N = 35), and no nutrition risk (GNRI > 98, N = 55). Perioperative outcomes and postoperative surgical complications were compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on major postoperative complications and prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS).ResultsPatients in the high/moderate risk group were significantly older, with lower BMI (P = 0.012), higher mortality rate (11.1%, P = 0.024), longer PLOS (P < 0.001), and higher incidence of over grade IIIB complications (37.0%, P = 0.001), Univariate and multivariate analyses showed the high/moderate risk GNRI group (OR 3.61, P = 0.032), increased age (OR 1.11, P = 0.014) and operative time over 8 h (OR 3.04, P = 0.027) were significantly associated with increased major postoperative complications. The high/moderate risk GNRI group was also a significant predictor for prolonged PLOS (OR 3.91, P = 0.002).ConclusionsPreoperative GNRI has the potential to be a predictive tool for identifying high-risk elderly patients and monitoring nutritional status preoperatively to improve postoperative surgical outcomes following PD.

Analysis of factors influencing pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and establishment of a new prediction model for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula

BackgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most prevalent complications following minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). Only one model related to MIPD exists, and previous POPF scoring prediction methods are based on open pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. Our objectives are to determine the variables that may increase the probability of pancreatic fistula following MIPD and to develop and validate a POPF predictive risk model.MethodsData from 432 patients who underwent MIPD between July 2015 and May 2022 were retrospectively collected. A nomogram prediction model was created using multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate independent factors for POPF in patients undergoing MIPD in the modeling cohort. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the calibration curve were used to verify the nomogram prediction model internally and externally within the modeling cohort and the verification cohort.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI), albumin, triglycerides, pancreatic duct diameter, pathological diagnosis and intraoperative bleeding were independent variables for POPF. On the basis of this information, a model for the prediction of risks associated with POPF was developed. In accordance with the ROC analysis, the modeling cohort's AUC was 0.819 (95% CI 0.747–0.891), the internal validation cohort's AUC was 0.830 (95% CI 0.747–0.912), and the external validation cohort's AUC was 0.793 (95% CI 0.671–0.915). Based on the calibration curve, the estimated values of POPF have a high degree of concordance with the actual values that were measured.ConclusionsThis model for predicting the probability of pancreatic fistula following MIPD has strong predictive capacity and can provide a trustworthy predictive method for the early screening of high-risk patients with pancreatic fistula after MIPD and timely clinical intervention.

Assessing the long-term priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors

BackgroundThis study assessed the long-term quality of life (QOL) and priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) survivors. MethodsSurvivors were surveyed via internet-based support groups. The relative importance of longevity, experience, costs, and QOL were assessed. ResultsThe PD cohort (n = 247, 35%) was 60 ± 12 years, 71% female, and 93% white. With moderate agreement, patients ranked survival most important, followed by functional and emotional well-being; costs and experience were least important (W = 35.7%, p < 0.001). Well-being improved throughout survivorship (P-QOL: 39 ± 12 at ≤3 mo vs 43 ± 12 at >10 y, p = 0.170; M-QOL: 38 ± 13 at ≤3 mo vs 44 ± 16 at >10 y; p = 0.015) but remained below the general population (p < 0.001). PD patients with benign diagnoses ranked functional independence as most important (2.00 ± 1.13 vs 2.63 ± 1.19, p < 0.001, W = 41.1%); PD patients with malignant diagnoses regarded overall survival most important (2.10 ± 1.20 vs 1.82 ± 1.22, p < 0.16, W = 35.1%). The mean rank order of priorities remained concordant between short-term (<1 year) and long-term (>5 years) survivors. ConclusionPD survivors experience long-term mental and physical health impairments, underscoring the importance of functional and emotional support. Survivors place paramount importance on overall survival, functional independence, and emotional well-being. Cancer survivors prioritize longevity, while survivors of chronic benign conditions prioritize functional independence.

Hemoglobin loss method calculates blood loss during pancreaticoduodenectomy and predicts bleeding-related risk factors.

The common clinical method to evaluate blood loss during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is visual inspection, but most scholars believe that this method is extremely subjective and inaccurate. Currently, there is no accurate, objective method to evaluate the amount of blood loss in PD patients. The hemoglobin (Hb) loss method was used to analyze the amount of blood loss during PD, which was compared with the blood loss estimated by traditional visual methods. The risk factors for bleeding were also predicted at the same time. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 341 patients who underwent PD in Shandong Provincial Hospital from March 2017 to February 2019. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into an open PD (OPD) group and a laparoscopic PD (LPD) group. The differences and correlations between the intraoperative estimation of blood loss (IEBL) obtained by visual inspection and the intraoperative calculation of blood loss (ICBL) obtained using the Hb loss method were analyzed. ICBL, IEBL and perioperative calculation of blood loss (PCBL) were compared between the two groups, and single-factor regression analysis was performed. There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative general patient information between the two groups (P > 0.05). PD had an ICBL of 743.2 (393.0, 1173.1) mL and an IEBL of 100.0 (50.0, 300.0) mL (P < 0.001). There was also a certain correlation between the two (r = 0.312, P < 0.001). Single-factor analysis of ICBL showed that a history of diabetes [95% confidence interval (CI): 53.82-549.62; P = 0.017] was an independent risk factor for ICBL. In addition, the single-factor analysis of PCBL showed that body mass index (BMI) (95%CI: 0.62-76.75; P = 0.046) and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 7.09-644.26; P = 0.045) were independent risk factors for PCBL. The ICBLs of the LPD group and OPD group were 767.7 (435.4, 1249.0) mL and 663.8 (347.7, 1138.2) mL, respectively (P > 0.05). The IEBL of the LPD group 200.0 (50.0, 200.0) mL was slightly greater than that of the OPD group 100.0 (50.0, 300.0) mL (P > 0.05). PCBL was greater in the LPD group than the OPD group [1061.6 (612.3, 1632.3) mL vs 806.1 (375.9, 1347.6) mL] (P < 0.05). The ICBL in patients who underwent PD was greater than the IEBL, but there is a certain correlation between the two. The Hb loss method can be used to evaluate intraoperative blood loss. A history of diabetes, preoperative bilirubin > 200 μmol/L and high BMI increase the patient's risk of bleeding.

Postoperative fluid therapy in enhanced recovery after surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Optimal intravenous fluid management during the perioperative period for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) within the framework of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is unclear. Studies have indicated that excessive total body salt and water can contribute to the development of oedema, leading to increased morbidity and extended hospital stays. This study aimed to assess the effects of an intravenous therapy regimen during postoperative day (POD) 0 to 2 in PD patients within ERAS. A retrospective interventional cohort study was conducted, and it involved all PD patients before and after implementation of ERAS (2009-2017). In the ERAS group, a targeted maintenance fluid regimen of 20 mL/kg/day with a sodium requirement of 0.5 mmoL/kg/day was administered. Outcome measures included the mmol of sodium and chloride administered, length of stay, and morbidity (postoperative pancreatic fistula, POPF; acute kidney injury, AKI; ileus). The study included 169 patients, with a mean age of 64 ± 11.3 years. Following implementation of the intravenous fluid therapy protocol, there was a significant reduction in chloride and sodium loading. However, in the multivariable analysis, chloride administered (mmoL/kg) did not independently influence the length of stay; or rates of POPF, ileus, or AKI (p > 0.05). The findings suggested that a postoperative intravenous fluid therapy regimen did not significantly impact morbidity. Notably, there was a trend towards reduced length of stay within an increasingly comorbid patient cohort. This targeted fluid regimen appears to be safe for PD patients within the ERAS program. Further prospective research is needed to explore this area.

Placement of Nasogastric Tubes in Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients: Switching from Immediate Intraoperative Removal to Avoiding Unnecessary Perioperative Use

BackgroundThe placement of nasogastric tubes (NGTs) in abdominal surgery has been adopted for decades to attenuate ileus and prevent aspiration pneumonia. In the recent era, the guidelines recommend not using NGT routinely, and even in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), immediate removal of NGT in operating rooms (ORs) was suggested. However, the clinical outcome and safety of abandoning NGT during the pre-PD and intra-PD periods remain unknown. MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective review on adult PD patients aged between 20 and 75 years from 2013 to 2022. The study population was grouped into the NGT group (NGT was placed before PD and immediately removed in the ORs) and the non-NGT group (NGT was not placed preoperatively). Safety was evaluated by the number of adverse events. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the need of NGT insertion in ORs among PD patients. ResultsThe case numbers in the NGT and non-NGT groups were 391 and 578, respectively. No case in the non-NGT group needed the intraoperative insertion of NGT. The rate of pulmonary complications was 2.3% in the NGT group compared to 1.6% in the non-NGT group (P = 0.400). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in terms of rates of major complications (12.8% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.089) or mortality (1.0% vs. 1.0%, P =0.980) between the two groups. The rates of the postoperative insertion of NGT in the NGT and non-NGT groups were 2.6% and 2.8% (P = 0.840), respectively. ConclusionFor selected PD patients, the placement of NGT during pre-PD and intra-PD periods may be safely omitted. This primary study is considered the first foundation stone in the extension of the element of no NGT in PD.

Machine learning approach to predict postpancreatectomy hemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study.

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a rare yet dreaded complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This retrospective study aimed to explore a machine learning (ML) model for predicting PPH in PD patients. A total of 284 patients who underwent open PD at our institute were included in the analysis. To address the issue of imbalanced data, the adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN) technique was employed. The best-performing ML model was selected using the PyCaret library in Python and evaluated based on recall, precision, and F1 score metrics. In addition to assessing the model's performance on the test data, bootstrap validation (n = 1000) with the original dataset was conducted. PPH occurred in 11 patients (3.9%), with a median onset time of 22days postoperatively. These minority cases were oversampled to 85 using ADASYN. The extra trees classifier demonstrated superior performance with recall, precision, and F1 score of 0.967, 0.914, and 0.937, respectively. Both validation using the test data and bootstrap resampling consistently demonstrated recall, precision, and F1 score exceeding 0.9. The model identified the peak value of C-reactive protein during the first 7 postoperative days as the most significant feature, followed by the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. This study highlights the potential of the ML approach to predict PPH occurrence following PD. Vigilance and early interventions guided by such model predictions could positively impact outcomes for high-risk patients.

Preoperative Immunonutrition and Postoperative Outcomes in Radical Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients.

This study aimed to compare the patient groups who received and did not receive immunonutrition in terms of mortality and morbidity in patients who underwent radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. Two groups were formed from 40 patients who underwent radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in our clinic in 2021. The patients in study group were given enteral immunonutrition support for 5 days preoperatively. For this purpose, a standard enteral immunonutrition product containing arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA (dietary nucleotides) was used. Patients' data of demographical, laboratory, postoperative complications, and current clinical status were analyzed. Mortality developed in 5 (25 %) patients in the treatment group and 4 (20 %) patients in the control group in the following months (P > .05). The estimated survival rate in the treatment group was 21.8 ± 2.8 months in the treatment group 19.1 ± 1.7 months in the control group (P > .05). The length of hospital stay was 12.89 ± 3.3 days in the treatment group, while it was 16.47 ± 6.83 days in the control group (P < .05). In the postoperative follow-ups, delayed gastric emptying symptoms developed in 3 patients in the treatment group, while the same complication was observed in 9 patients in the control group (P < .05). Surgical site infections occurred in 4 patients in the treatment group and 9 patients in the control group (P < .05). It was observed that preoperative oral immunonutrition before pancreaticoduodenectomy was effective in reducing the risk of delayed gastric emptying after surgery and the length of hospital stay.

No Drain, No Problem: Serum-Based Marker Prediction of Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Postoperative day (POD) 1 drain amylase concentration (DAC) is considered the most accurate predictor for the development of a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Recent studies have associated drain placement with negative postoperative outcomes. This study aims to evaluate multiple biochemical markers and their associations with CR-POPF development in order to identify a reliable, non-drain dependent alternative to DAC. This is a review of 53 consecutive PD patients between 2021 and 2022. Albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), DAC, white blood cell count, and procalcitonin values were compared by CR-POPF status. The discriminatory abilities of CAR, CRP, and DAC for CR-POPF were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Six of 51 included patients developed a CR-POPF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis produced an area under the curve of .977 for POD 1 DAC (cut-off 5131.0 IU/L, sensitivity 100%, specificity 95.5%), .858 for POD 1 CRP (cut-off 52.5mg/L, sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.7%), and 1.000 for POD 3 CAR (cut-off 99.2, sensitivity and specificity 100%). POD 3 CAR produced a positive and negative predictive value of 100%. The CAR and CRP provide early and accurate identification of patients with post-PD CR-POPFs. These markers offer a method of safe CR-POPF detection, when the gold standard DAC is unavailable, ultimately allowing for early intervention and patient rescue.

Pancreaticogastrostomy versus Pancreaticojejunostomy and the Proposal of a New Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Risk Score.

Despite the substantial decrease in mortality rates following a pancreaticoduodenectomy to less than 5%, morbidity rates remain significant, reaching even 73%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is one of the most frequent major complications and is significantly associated with other complications, including patient death. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the ideal type of pancreatic anastomosis, as the question of the choice between a pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy is still open. Furthermore, worldwide implementation of an ideal pancreatic fistula risk prediction score is missing. Our study found several significant predictive factors for the postoperative occurrence of fistulas, such as the soft consistency of the pancreas, non-dilated Wirsung duct, important intraoperative blood loss, other perioperative complications, preoperative patient hypoalbuminemia, and patient weight loss. Our study also revealed that for patients who exhibit fistula risk factors, pancreaticogastrostomy demonstrates a significantly lower pancreatic fistula rate than pancreaticojejunostomy. The occurrence of pancreatic fistulas has been significantly associated with the development of other postoperative major complications, and patient death. As the current pancreatic fistula risk scores proposed by various authors have not been consensually validated, we propose a simple, easy-to-use, and sensitive score for the risk prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence based on important predictors from statistical analyses that have also been found to be significant by most of the reported studies. The new pancreatic fistula risk score proposed by us could be extremely useful for improved therapeutic management of cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.

Perioperative Fluid Balance and the Risk of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-adjusted Analysis.

The impact of perioperative fluid management on postoperative morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the independent association between perioperative fluid balance (FB) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in PD patients. A total of 243 consecutive open PD patients were included. Intra- and postoperative FB until postoperative day 3 were calculated, and their predictive performance for POPF was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Propensity score (PS) was estimated as the probability of having higher FB, and factors associated with POPF were identified using crude and PS-adjusted logistic regression models. POPF occurred in 60 patients (24.7%). ROC analysis showed the highest predictive value for total FB on postoperative days 1 and 2, with a cut-off value of 1,585 ml (area under the ROC curve=0.74). Patients with FB ≥1,585 ml had a significantly higher POPF rate (48.3%) compared to those with lower FB (11.0%, PS-adjusted p<0.001). Male sex, body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, biliary drainage, main pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, and higher FB showed significant associations with POPF in crude univariate analysis. Higher FB remained a significant factor in both crude multivariate and PS-adjusted analysis [crude multivariate: odds ratio (OR)=8.0; PS-adjusted univariate: OR=4.2; PS-adjusted multivariate: OR=6.1, all p<0.001]. Higher early postoperative FB, a potentially modifiable factor, may be independently associated with increased risk of POPF in PD patients.

SP2.4 The impact of preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists grade on major pancreatoduodenectomy outcomes

Abstract American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade is often used as a crude assessment for grading patients prior to major surgery, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Patients deemed to have a high ASA grade may not be offered resection. Increasing ASA grade is known to correlate with increasing morbidity and mortality rates. Prior authors have argued that caution should be used when offering PD to ASA grade &amp;gt;II patients. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of PD patients with a low ASA grade (I-II) with high ASA grade (&amp;gt;II). Data was extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) study, a multicentre retrospective cohort study of outcomes following PD performed for pancreatic head malignancy (29 centres in 8 countries, n=1484). Patients were grouped by their ASA grade. The outcomes of interest were median length of stay (LoS), 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality and five-year survival. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Fisher exact test. Out of 1484 cases, 1365 (92.0%) had information regarding their ASA grade available. Of these, 973 (71.3%) were ASA grade I-II and 392 (28.7%) were ASA grade &amp;gt;II. Whilst those with a high ASA grade had significantly longer LoS (14 vs 13 days, p&amp;lt;0.0001), 30-day readmission (8.5% vs 11.7% p=0.1), 90-day mortality (3.1% vs 4.6%, p=0.2) and five-year survival (32.5% vs 28.8%) rates were similar. In our multicentre study of PD patients, high ASA grade correlated with increased LoS. However, a high ASA grade did not affect the other studied outcomes. Therefore, higher ASA grade alone should not be an absolute contraindication to PD.