Pancreatic Resection Research Articles

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Prognostic Nutritional Index Are Predictors for Overall Survival after Primary Pancreatic Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single Centre Evaluation.

Prognostic inflammation-based parameters have been reported as useful tools in various oncologic diseases. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a high mortality rate, making reliable prognostic markers highly desirable. However, there is still inconsistency in the literature regarding the efficacy of the different available scores. A total of 207 patients, who underwent primary resection of PDAC from January 2000 to December 2018 at the University Hospital of Erlangen, were included in this retrospective single-center study. Different biomarkers, including the preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the c-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin ratio (CAR), the lymphocyte-CRP ratio (LCR), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) were analyzed for their ability to predict overall survival (OS). In our cohort, the median overall survival was 20.7 months. Among the investigated biomarkers, NLR and PNI were identified as independent prognostic markers (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.6 (1.0-2.5), p = 0.048 and HR 0.6 (0.4-0.9), p = 0.018), whereas PLR, CAR, LCR and mGPS did not reach significance in the multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed that the prognostic value of NLR and PNI is particularly evident in locally advanced tumor stages (pT3/4 and pN+). The NLR and PNI could serve as valuable tools for estimating prognosis in patients with PDAC undergoing pancreatic resection in curative intention, especially in locally advanced tumor stages. However, conflicting results in the current literature highlight the need for further prospective studies to validate these findings.

Prevalence of autoimmune pancreatitis in pancreatic resection for suspected malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/ObjectivesAutoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a diagnosis-challenging disease that often mimics pancreatic malignancy. Pancreatic resection is considered to be a curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This meta-analysis aims to study the incidence of AIP in patients who have undergone pancreatic resection for clinical manifestation of cancer.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in three databases, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, using the terms ‘autoimmune pancreatitis’ and ‘pancreatic resection’ and supplemented by manual checks of reference lists in all retrieved articles.ResultsTen articles were included in the final analysis. 8917 pancreatic resections were performed because of a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. AIP accounted for 140 cases (1.6%). Type 1 AIP comprised the majority of cases, representing 94% (132 cases), while type 2 AIP made up the remaining 6% (eight cases) after further classification. AIP accounted for almost 26% of all cases of benign diseases involving unnecessary surgery and was overrepresented in males in 70% of cases compared to 30% in females. The mean age for AIP patients was 59 years. Serum CA 19 − 9 levels were elevated in 23 out of 47 (49%) AIP patients, where higher levels were detected more frequently in patients with type 1 AIP (51%, 22 out of 43) than in those with type 2 AIP (25%, 1 out of 4). The sensitivity of IgG4 levels in type 1 AIP was low (43%, 21/49 patients).ConclusionEven with modern diagnostic methods, distinguishing between AIP and PDAC can still be challenging, thus potentially resulting in unnecessary surgical procedures in some cases. Serum CA 19 − 9 levels are not useful in distinguishing between AIP and PDAC. Work must thus be done to improve diagnostic methods and avoid unnecessary complicated surgery.

CT Surveillance for Local Recurrence After Pancreatic Cancer Resection: Evaluation of Imaging Findings From the SAR Disease-Focused Panel Consensus Statement.

Background: A Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) consensus statement described findings suspicious for local recurrence (LR) on surveillance imaging after PDAC resection. Objective: To evaluate the interreader agreement and predictive utility of potential imaging findings of LR on serial surveillance CT examinations after Whipple procedure for PDAC, using the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement. Methods: This retrospective study included 126 patients (mean age, 68.5±10.3 years; 72 men, 54 women) who underwent Whipple surgery for PDAC between January 2009 and December 2014. Three radiologists independently reviewed baseline and subsequent postoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT examinations performed within 2 years postoperatively, evaluating features in the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement relating to surgical bed stranding, surgical bed soft tissue, vessel encasement, main pancreatic duct dilatation, and ascites. Interreader agreement was calculated. The reference standard for LR development within 2 years postoperatively incorporated all available information. Imaging features' frequencies were calculated for recurrence examinations (i.e., first surveillance examinations indicating LR). For baseline postoperative examinations, features associations' with eventual LR development were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: LR developed within 2 years postoperatively in 81/126 patients. For both baseline and subsequent examinations, agreement for stranding and soft tissue morphology were poor, for vessel encasement was fair, for soft tissue and ascites were moderate, and for main pancreatic duct dilatation was substantial. On recurrence examinations, across readers, new or increased stranding was present in 27-77%; new or increased soft tissue, 80-86%; soft tissue with vessel encasement and luminal narrowing, 36-59%; new or increased main pancreatic duct dilatation, 25-26%; and new or increased ascites, 20-23%. On baseline postoperative examinations, independent predictors of eventual LR were soft tissue for all three readers (OR=2.78-6.85) and stranding for reader 1 (OR=3.59); main pancreatic duct dilatation and ascites were not independent predictors of LR for any reader. Conclusion: This study highlights the role of soft tissue, particularly when associated with vessel encasement and luminal narrowing, in raising suspicion for LR after PDAC resection. Clinical Impact: This study supports the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement, while highlighting opportunities for continued optimization.

Comments and illustrations of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidelines: Multiparametric imaging and EUS-guided sampling in rare pancreatic tumors. Benign mesenchymal pancreatic tumors.

The focus of the review is on primary benign mesenchymal pancreatic tumors and their imaging appearance. These tumors are extremely rare. Usually, they are not diagnosed until postoperative histology is available, and so even benign tumors have undergone extensive pancreatic resection. The very limited data on abdominal and EUS findings including contrast-enhanced techniques of these pancreatic lesions are summarized here. Case reports will be presented for some of these rare tumors with application of modern ultrasound and endosonographic techniques.

Sex differences in pancreatic cancer

This review article discusses the currently available evidence on the importance of biological and social sex in pancreatic cancer in the context of the operative, perioperative and multimodal treatment. In pancreatic cancer there are gender differences with respect to the incidence, treatment response and prognosis. Sex significantly influences both innate and adaptive immune responses, thereby affecting treatment response and survival rates. Women are less likely to receive systemic treatment and tend to wait longer for surgery but have better perioperative outcomes after pancreatic resection. Overall, female pancreatic cancer patients seem to have longer survival under treatment; however, they report asubjectively lower quality of life and higher disease burden.

Relationships between postoperative recurrences and standardized uptake value on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BackgroundThis study aimed to examine postoperative recurrence after curative pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focusing on its relationship with the standardized uptake value (SUV) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). MethodThe postoperative initial recurrence patterns were examined in patients with R- and BR-PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection. Data collected from three prospective clinical trials were retrospectively analysed. ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 29 months, 91 (60 %) of 151 patients experienced postoperative recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all patients was 18 months. The sites of first recurrence were lung-only in 24 (26 %) patients, liver-only in 23 (25 %), local-only in 11 (12 %), peritoneum-only in 10 (11 %), other single site in 5 (5 %), and multiple sites in 19 (21 %) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET at diagnoses ≥5.40 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01–2.61; p = 0.045) and node-positive pathology (HR, 2.01; 95 % CI, 1.32–3.08; p = 0.001) as significant predictors of RFS. Furthermore, the SUVmax at initial diagnosis and after NACRT correlated with liver metastasis. ConclusionR- and BR-PDACs with high SUV on FDG-PET at diagnosis are risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Among patients who undergo surgery after NACRT, those with a high SUVmax at diagnosis or post-NACRT require careful attention for postoperative liver recurrence.

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes are Over-Utilized in the Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Large databases, such as the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium1, rely on ICD-10 diagnosis codes to identify patients with specificity. Patients enrolled in retrospective research studies are often collected via the use of ICD-10 diagnosis codes. These codes can be subject to error due to over- or under-diagnosing, which is especially true in diseases that are difficult to diagnose, such as chronic pancreatitis (CP). Symptoms of chronic pancreatitis can be vague and non-specific, particularly in the early stages of the disease. This study aimed to determine if ICD-10 diagnosis codes for CP are overutilized and to recognize alternative pathologies that likely lead to the ICD-10 diagnosis code for CP being placed. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted of all patients with ICD-10 codes K86.0 (alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis) and K86.1 (other chronic pancreatitis) who were seen in either an outpatient or inpatient setting at a tertiary care center from February 2018 to February 2020. Data was extracted from the institution’s integrated electronic data repository. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). A total of 1,360 unique patient charts were reviewed, of which 176 carried ICD-10 code K86.0 and 1,184 carried ICD-10 code K86.1. The diagnosis of CP was defined as either being made by a gastroenterologist, proven by biopsy, or having classic findings of CP on cross-sectional imaging with appropriate symptoms. RESULTS A total of 504 (37%) out of the 1,360 patient charts did not have any evidence of chronic pancreatitis despite being labeled with an ICD-10 code for CP. When broken down by diagnosis code, 41 of 176 charts (23.3%) with K86.0 and 461 of 1,184 charts (38.6%) with K86.1 did not have any evidence of CP. Of these patients, 163 had a single episode of acute pancreatitis of any etiology, 107 had recurrent acute pancreatitis, 29 had an episode of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, 22 had cancer (pancreatic or cholangiocarcinoma), 19 had pancreatic resection without underlying CP, 48 had chronic abdominal pain of non-pancreaticobiliary etiology (IBS, IBD, gastritis, PUD, gastroparesis), and 81 had no identifiable abdominal pathology. CONCLUSIONS We found that even at a tertiary care center and a pancreatic center of excellence, many patients with no evidence of chronic pancreatitis were labeled at some point in their care with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for CP. The majority of these had an alternative pancreatic pathology however a significant number had no evidence of a pancreaticobiliary pathology. Although the OneFlorida database makes multicenter research more accessible, it does not replace labor-intensive chart review for CP given the propensity for over-diagnosis.

Optimizing terminology for pancreatectomy: Introducing a new notation system.

We introduce a novel notation system for pancreatectomy designed to provide a clear and concise representation of surgical procedures. As surgical techniques and the scope of pancreatic surgeries continue to diversify, existing communication methods among medical professionals regarding the specifics of the surgeries have proven inadequate. Our proposed notation system clearly indicates the approach (open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted), type of surgery (e.g., pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy), and extent of resection and accompanying resected organs or vasculature. These elements are all recorded in this order by using abbreviations. For example, a pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatic transection just above the SMA and combined resection of the SMV would be noted as "OPD(hb')-SMV". This new notation system allows for concise expression of the essential information on performed procedures of pancreatic resection, leading to smooth information sharing. This initiative is an essential step towards standardizing pancreatic surgery documentation on a global scale. Here, we present the development and application of this system, highlighting its potential to transform surgical communication and documentation.

Prospective Validation of the Pancreatic Fistula Risk Classification by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (PARIS trial).

The aim of this study was a prospective validation of the recently established ISGPS pancreas classification as a parenchymal risk classification system for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the major driver for complications after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Recently, the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) published a pancreas classification containing the parameters main pancreatic duct diameter (MPD) and pancreatic texture to help assess the risk of POPF development following pancreatoduodenectomy. From January 2020 to July 2021, 271 patients receiving elective PD were included after informed consent. The postoperative course was documented prospectively up to postoperative day 30. Among the pancreas characteristics, MPD and pancreatic texture were assessed intraoperatively at the pancreatic resection margin and the pancreatic glands were assigned to one of the four pancreas classes according to the ISGPS (A to D). The primary endpoint was POPF according to the updated ISGPS definition. Secondary endpoints comprised other post-PD morbidity and mortality. Of 271 patients, 264 had available data according to the ISGPS pancreas classification. Of those, 78 were assigned to class A (30%), 53 to class B (20%), 50 to class C (19%) and 83 to class D (31%). POPF occurred in 54 of 271 patients (19.9%). The 30-day mortality was 7/271 (2.6%), with 6/7 having developed POPF (86%). POPF rates within the classes A, B, C and D were 9.0%, 11.3%, 20.0% and 37.4%, respectively (P<0.001). In the univariable regression analysis, only patients in pancreas class D demonstrated a significantly higher risk for POPF when compared to class A (OR 6.05, 95%-CI: 2.6-15.9, P<0.001). In the multivariable regression model, patients in class D had a significantly higher risk for POPF compared to class A (OR 3.45, 95%-CI: 1.15-11.3, P=0.032). The model comprised Body Mass Index, surgery duration, microscopic fibrosis and the ISGPS pancreas classification, demonstrating an AUC-value of approximately 0.82 when tested on the PARIS dataset. This prospective trial shows that the ISGPS pancreas classification is valid. Patients in risk class D are prone to POPF independently of other factors. Therefore, all future publications on pancreatic surgery should report the risk class according to the ISGPS pancreas classification to allow for a better comparison of reported cohorts.

The Impact of Postoperative Complications on Recovery of Health-Related Quality of Life and Functional Capacity After Pancreatectomy: Findings From a Prospective Observational Study.

To evaluate the extent to which postoperative complications impact patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and survival after pancreatic surgery. Pancreatectomy is frequently associated with severe postoperative morbidity, which can affect patient recovery. Few and conflicting data are available regarding the effect of post-pancreatectomy complications on patient-reported HRQoL. This is an observational cohort study including consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (NCT04431076) who underwent elective pancreatectomy (2020-2022). Before surgery and on postoperative days 15, 30, 90, and 180, patients completed the PROMIS-29 profile and Duke Activity Status Index questionnaires to assess their HRQoL and functional capacity. Mean differences in HRQoL scores were obtained using multivariable linear regression adjusting for preoperative scores and confounders. Of 528 patients, 370 (70%) experienced morbidity within 90 days, and 154 (29%) had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade >2). Delayed gastric emptying had the greatest impact on HRQoL, showing decreased mental health up to POD90 and physical health up to POD180 compared with uncomplicated patients. An inverse relationship between complication severity grade and HRQoL was evident for most domains, with Clavien-Dindo grade 3b to 4 patients showing worse HRQoL and functional capacity scores up to 6 months after surgery. In 235 pancreatic cancer patients, grade 3b and 4 complications were associated with reduced disease-specific survival (median 25 vs 41mo, P <0.001). In patients undergoing pancreatic resection, postoperative complications significantly impact all domains of patient quality of life with a dose-effect relationship between complication severity and impairment of HRQoL and functional capacity.

Continuous early warning score calculations can facilitate the evaluation of the condition of patients developing anastomotic leak or infection after esophageal and pancreatic resection; a cohort study

BackgroundEarly diagnosis of anastomotic leak is challenging due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation. Continuous vital sign monitoring compared to periodic monitoring has potential to expedite anastomotic leak diagnosis. The aim is to assess this potential after esophageal and pancreatic cancer resection. MethodsIn this data modelling cohort study vital signs were continuously monitored and periodically recorded according to EWS protocol. We retrospectively calculated EWSs every one minute using continuous vital sign data. The percentage of patients having an EWS-alarm in 24 hours preceding an anastomotic leak, the elapsed time between the first alarm and diagnosis were compared between regular periodic nurse EWSs and the continuously calculated EWSs. These data were also compared to those of patients with other infectious complications and controls without complications. ResultsOne hundred ninety patients were included, twenty-six with an anastomotic leak (14%), thirty-six with an infectious complication (19%) and one hundred twenty-eight controls (67%). The time between the first continuous EWS-alarm and anastomotic leak was 23 hours [IQR 19-24] compared to 3hrs [IQR 2-13] with periodic alarms. Sixty-two percent of leak patients had at least one continuous alarm in the 24 hours before the event, compared to 15% for periodic EWS (p<.001). More patients with infections had a continuous alarm compared to anastomotic leak patients (86% vs. 62%, p=.026). Postoperative alarms in both groups were more frequent compared to controls. ConclusionAfter esophageal and pancreatic resections, continuous monitoring alarms earlier and more frequently than periodic monitoring before anastomotic leak diagnosis. However, combination with several other diagnostic modalities seems required for the definite diagnosis.

Clinical feasibility of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreatic head as an intermediate procedure between enucleation and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

This study was performed to demonstrate the clinical application of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) as a surgical treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in terms of both curability and maintenance of postoperative quality of life. Seven patients diagnosed with PNETs underwent DPPHR from January 2011 to December 2021 at our institution. We investigated the clinical relevance of DPPHR based on the patients' clinicopathological findings. The median operative time was 492min, and the median blood loss was 302g. Postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding was observed in one patient. Pathological examination revealed a World Health Organization classification of G1 in six patients and G2 in one patient. Microvascular invasion was observed in two patients (29%); however, no patients developed lymph node metastasis or recurrence during the follow-up period. A daughter lesion was observed near the primary tumor in one patient. All patients achieved curative resection, and no tumor specimens showed positive margins. DPPHR facilitates anatomical resection of the pancreatic head in patients with PNETs as well as detailed pathological evaluation of the resected specimen. Therefore, this surgical procedure is an acceptable alternative to pancreaticoduodenectomy or enucleation for patients with PNETs.

Impact of Order Set on Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency in Chronic Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Cancer, and Pancreatic Resection

Impact of Order Set on Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency in Chronic Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Cancer, and Pancreatic Resection

Rapid metastatic recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection: a multi-center, regional analysis of trends in surgical failure over two decades

BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAc) is a lethal malignancy, attributed in part to high rates of rapid recurrence (rrPDAc) following resection. We sought to characterize recurrence rates over time and investigate factors predictive of rrPDAc. MethodsA regional multi-institutional cancer registry, augmented with data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, was queried for patients with PDAc from 1996 to 2020. rrPDAc was defined as recurrence within 6 months following curative-intent resection. ResultsWe identified 924 patients who underwent resection for PDAc; rrPDAc occurred in 236 (26%) patients. Median incidence of rrPDAc was 25.3% (IQR 22–30.2%) per year. Median survival in rrPDAc, non-rapid recurrence, and no recurrence was 10.3, 25.2, and 56.1 months respectively (p < 0.001). Variables independently associated with greater odds of rrPDAc included surgical site infection (SSI) (OR 2.06) and nodal positivity (OR 2.05); adjuvant therapy was associated with lower odds (OR 0.38). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not alter risk of rrPDAc. Three-year post-recurrence survival was no different in rrPDAc versus those without. ConclusionDespite therapeutic advances, incidence of rrPDAc remains unchanged. SSIs and nodal positivity are independently associated with increased risk of rrPDAc, while adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with lower risk. Strategies focused on preventing rapid recurrence may improve survival.

Disease progression of side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms following solid organ transplant

BackgroundBranch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) are becoming more prevalent with advanced medical imaging and account for most of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs). Most incidental lesions should be surveyed, with resection reserved for specific, high-risk cases. Solid organ transplantation candidates may be high risk of resection before transplant and will require systemic immunosuppression after transplant, which has been theorized to alter the natural history of the IPMN. We aimed to describe the progression in surveilled cysts after solid organ transplantation. MethodsA prospectively maintained database of PCNs was queried for patients with IPMN. Patients who had received a previous solid organ transplantation and with ≥2 imaging studies >6 months apart after transplantation were included. Clinically relevant (CR) progression was defined as symptoms, worrisome/high-risk stigmata, or invasive carcinoma (IC). Growth ≥5 mm in 2 years is considered CR progression; size ≥3 cm alone is not. ResultsBetween 1997 and 2023, 252 patients received solid organ transplantation (liver, 86; kidney, 113; and lung, 54) and were diagnosed as having an IPMN. This cohort was compared with a set of 770 patients surveilled for IPMN who did not have previous transplantation. Median follow-up period was 3.7 years (IQR, 1.6–6.8). Moreover, 2 transplant patients (0.8%) developed IC, and 4 developed (1.6%) high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Both were less common in transplant patients than the nontransplant population (IC, 3.3%; HGD, 2.9%), although this was not significant on time-to-event analysis (IC, P = .152; HGD, P = .352). The rate of CR progression was high in the transplant cohort (n = 118; 47%). Features of CR progression included size growth (n = 79; 67%), other worrisome/high-risk stigmata (n = 25; 21%), and new main duct involvement (n = 14; 12%). Compared with the nontransplant (n = 128; 17%), transplant patients had a higher rate of CR progression (P < .001), which was mostly explained by a more frequent size growth (31% vs 9%; P < .001). However, no transplant patients with size growth CR progression developed IC. Moreover, 17 (6.7%) required pancreatic surgery for CR progression after transplant vs 58 (7.5%) in the nontransplant population. Furthermore, 6 resected cysts (35%) harbored high-risk pathology after transplant (IC, 2; HGD, 4) vs 40 (69%) in the general population (P < .001; IC, 29; HGD, 11). ConclusionMalignant transformation of BD-IPMNs is rare despite systemic immunosuppression in solid organ transplant patients. This supports transplantation in patients with IPMN without fear of worsening their risk of pancreatic cancer, although it was associated with a higher risk of disease progression. Patients with IPMNs should be surveilled with yearly scans after transplant, with pancreatic resection reserved for only high-risk features as we continue to define the optimal criteria for those with CR progression.

Clinicopathological Features of Pediatric Insulinoma: A Single-Centre Study.

Aims/Background: Insulinoma is an extremely rare condition in pediatric patients. This study aims to examine the pathological and clinical characteristics of pediatric insulinoma. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted involving five pediatric patients diagnosed with insulinoma. The study involved evaluating the postoperative status of the patients during follow-up and analyzing their clinical manifestations, diagnostic work-up, pathological findings, and therapeutic approaches. Results: The study cohort comprised four males and one female, aged between 4 and 9 years. Common symptoms included dizziness and fatigue. The insulinomas were located in various parts of the pancreas: two in the head, one in the neck, one in the body, and one in the tail. After undergoing subtotal pancreatectomy, four patients experienced no side effects during a follow-up period of 41 to 153 months. One patient, who underwent an incomplete pancreatic resection, required ongoing postoperative treatment with 150 mg Creon due to pancreatic enzyme deficiency. Postoperative pathological results indicated that all cases were low-grade neuroendocrine tumours, classified as grade 1 (G1) or grade 2 (G2). Two cases exhibited capsule invasion, and one case showed microvascular invasion. Despite these invasions, no recurrences or metastases have been observed to date. Conclusion: Surgical resection is a viable treatment option for pediatric insulinoma, yielding a favorable prognosis. The presence of capsular and microvascular invasions does not seem to affect the overall prognosis in these cases.

Cystoductojejunostomy for pseudocyst associated with chronic pancreatitis

Pseudocyst is frequently associated with chronic pancreatitis (CP). We describe our experience of managing seven patients for pseudocyst associated with CP by bile duct preserving pancreatic head resection (BDPPHR) and cystoductojejunostomy. 88 patients were operated on for chronic pancreatitis between April 2021 till May 2023 out of which 7 patients underwent BDPPHR and cystoductojejunostomy for pseudocyst associated with CP. Key steps of surgery include meticulous dissection with exposure of the pancreatic head to tail, head excision up to the posterior capsule with laying open of the pancreatic duct till the tail and reconstruction incorporating pancreatic duct (PD) and pseudocyst to a single loop of jejunum. All seven patients were successfully treated with BDPPHR and cystoductojejunostomy. Mean operative time and mean blood loss was 478 minutes and 450 ml respectively. Mean hospital stay was 4.5 days. On follow-up at a one-year minimum, all patients had complete pain relief. In patients with pseudocyst associated with CP, surgery preferably needs to address both the pseudocyst and the underlying chronic pancreatitis to improve the quality of life. A combined anastomosis to the PD and cyst may be termed as cystoductojejunostomy.

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for circumportal pancreas: literature review and report of two type IIIA cases

BackgroundCircumportal pancreas is a rare morphological variant with clinical significance due to the high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Type IIIA (suprasplenic anteportal) is the most common type of circumportal pancreas. We present two cases of type IIIA treated with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy, and review the literature on patients with circumportal pancreas who underwent pancreatic surgery.Case presentationCase 1: Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Non-functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm with Circumportal Pancreas. A 69-year-old female with no prior medical history presented with a pancreatic head mass detected during routine ultrasound. CT revealed a 20 mm hypervascular tumor in pancreas head and a suprasplenic circumportal pancreas with an anteportal duct. The main pancreatic duct (MPD) was not in the parenchyma on the dorsal side of the portal vein (PV). Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The anteportal side was resected with an ultrasonic device, and the retroportal side with a mesh-reinforced stapler. Pancreaticojejunostomy was performed without complications. Case 2: Robot-assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer and Non-functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm in the pancreatic tail with Circumportal Pancreas. A 72-year-old male with no prior medical history presented with a dilated main pancreatic duct on ultrasound. Diagnosed with pancreatic head cancer (Stage IIA), he underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed pancreatic cancer in the head and a tumor in the tail with unknown pathology. Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, and pancreatectomy on the left side of the tail tumor was planned. Intraoperative findings revealed a circumportal pancreas with the MPD not running through the dorsal parenchyma. After resected the parenchyma on the left side of the tail tumor, parenchyma on the dorsal side of the PV was dissected using SynchroSeal®. Pancreaticojejunostomy was performed without complications. The postoperative course was uneventful.ConclusionsThe optimal location and method of pancreatic resection should be selected according to the type of circumportal pancreas and the location of the lesion to be resected to minimize the risk of pancreatic fistula. Minimally invasive surgery for circumportal pancreas remains challenging even for surgical teams with sufficient experience and skills, and careful consideration are necessary for its application.

Impacts of different pancreatic resection ranges on endocrine function in Suncus murinus.

Surgical intervention involving the pancreas can lead to impaired glucose tolerance and other types of endocrine dysfunction. The scope of pancreatectomy and whether it includes the ventral pancreas are the key factors in the development of postoperative diabetes. The ventral and dorsal pancreases are almost separated in Suncus murinus (S. murinus). To investigate the effects of different extents of pancreatic resection on endocrine function in S. murinus. Eight-week-old male S. murinus shrews were randomly divided into three experimental groups according to different pancreatic resection ranges as follows: ventral pancreatectomy (VPx) group; partial pancreatectomy (PPx) group; subtotal pancreatectomy (SPx) group; and a sham-operated group. Postprandial serum insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and somatostatin (SST) levels, as well as food intake, weight, blood glucose, and glucose tolerance were regularly measured for each animal. S. murinus treated with PPx and SPx suffered from varying degrees of impaired glucose tolerance, but only a small proportion of the SPx group developed diabetes. Only S. murinus in the SPx group showed a significant decrease in food intake accompanied by severe weight loss, as well as a significant increase in postprandial serum GLP-1 levels. Postprandial serum PP levels decreased in both the VPx and PPx groups, but not in the SPx group. Postprandial serum SST levels decreased in both VPx and PPx groups, but the decrease was marginal. Severe weight loss after pancreatectomy may be related to loss of appetite caused by compensatory elevation of GLP-1. PP and GLP-1 may play a role in resisting blood glucose imbalance.

Distinct Indications for Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Invasive Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas Compared with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundSurgical and adjuvant management of mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) lacks formal guidelines and data is limited to institutional studies. Factors associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy and any associated impact on survival remain to be clarified. In the absence of other data, guidelines that recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma have been extrapolated to MCN.Patients and MethodsThe National Cancer Database (2004–2019) was utilized to identify all patients that underwent pancreatic resection for invasive MCNs. Patients that received neoadjuvant therapy or did not undergo lymphadenectomy were excluded. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors associated with survival were assessed.ResultsFor 161 patients with invasive MCN, median overall survival (OS) was 133 months and 45% of patients received adjuvant therapy. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that poorly differentiated tumors [odds ratio (OR) 4.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47–11.98; p = 0.008] and positive lymph node status (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.02–6.98; p = 0.042) were independent predictors of receiving adjuvant therapy. Lymph node positivity [hazard ratio (HR) 2.90, 95% CI 1.47–5.73; p = 0.002], positive margins (HR 5.28, 95% CI 2.28–12.27; p < 0.001), and stage III disease (HR 12.46, 95% CI 1.40–111.05; p = 0.024) were associated with worse OS. Receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy was independently associated with decreased risk of mortality in node positive patients (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10–0.69; p = 0.002). Survival was not associated with adjuvant therapy in patients with negative lymph nodes or margin negative status.ConclusionIn contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), where adjuvant therapy improves OS for every tumor stage, surgery alone for invasive MCN is not associated with improved OS compared with surgery plus adjuvant therapy in node-negative patients. Surgery alone is likely sufficient for a subset of invasive MCN.