Pancreatic Malignancy In Patients Research Articles

Incidence of pancreatic cancer during long-term follow-up in patients with incidental pancreatic cysts smaller than 2cm.

To assess the long-term malignancy risk of incidental small pancreatic cysts. In this HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved, retrospective, multi-institutional study, the long-term incidence of pancreatic cancer was compared between patients with and without small pancreatic cysts. Patients with incidental pancreatic cysts ≥ 0.5 and < 2.0cm in maximal diameter, detected on MRI performed between 1999 and 2011, represented the "small pancreatic cyst" group. Patients that underwent MRI between 2005 and 2011 and had no reported pancreatic cysts represented the comparison "no cyst" group. The "small pancreatic cyst" group included 267 patients, ages 63.4 ± 11.8years, 166/267 (62%) women with a mean follow-up of 8.6 ± 4.3years, median 9.2years; the "no cyst" group included 1,459 patients, ages 64.6 ± 12years, 794/1,459 (54%) women with a mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 4.2years, median 7.8 (p values 0.12, 0.02, < 0.001, respectively). Two/267 (0.7%) patients developed pancreatic cancer at a separate location from the known cyst in the "small pancreatic cyst" group, with a cancer rate of 0.9 (95% CI 0.1-3.1) cases per 1,000 patient-years. In the "no cyst" cohort, 18/1,459 (1.2%) patients developed pancreatic cancer, with a cancer rate of 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-3.1) cases per 1,000 patient-years (p = 0.6). The all-cause mortality was similar in both groups: 57/267 (21%) vs. 384/1,459 (26%) (p = 0.09). The long-term risk of pancreatic malignancy in asymptomatic patients with incidental pancreatic cysts less than 2cm is 0.9 cases per 1,000 patient-years of follow-up, similar to those without pancreatic cysts. These very few pancreatic cancers developed at a separate location from the known cyst. • After a median of 9.2years of follow-up, the risk of pancreatic malignancy in patients with an asymptomatic small pancreatic cyst was 0.9 cases per 1,000 patient-years of follow-up, similar to those without pancreatic cysts. • Very few pancreatic cancer cases developed in the location separate from the known pancreatic cyst.

Clinical and radiological features that predict malignant transformation in cystic lesions of the pancreas: a retrospective case note review.

Background: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are being detected with increasing frequency. Current methods of stratifying risk of malignant transformation are imperfect. This study aimed to determine the frequency of pancreatic malignancy in patients with PCL and define clinical and radiological features that predict malignant transformation in patients managed by surgery and/or surveillance. Methods: A retrospective cohort of adults who were evaluated in a tertiary hepatopancreaticobiliary centre between January 2000 - December 2013 with a confirmed PCL and followed up for at least 5 years. All cystic lesions were discussed at a weekly multidisciplinary meeting. Results: Of the 1,090 patients diagnosed with a PCL, 768 patients were included in the study: 141 patients were referred for immediate pancreatic resection, 570 entered surveillance while 57 had a malignant PCL which was unresectable at diagnosis (n=47) or were unfit for surgery (n=10). In those who were resected following presentation, malignancy was present in 38%. During follow-up 2% of those entering a surveillance programme underwent malignant transformation. Clinical and radiological features associated with a high-risk PCL included older age, symptoms, associated solid component or dilated main pancreatic duct. In intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, larger size was not a feature of malignant transformation (benign vs. malignant 30mm vs. 23mm; P= 0.012). Conclusion: The sensitivity of standard diagnostic tests leading to immediate surgery for high-risk PCL (malignant or mucinous) was 92% but with a specificity of just 5%. Surveillance of PCL without high-risk features within a multidisciplinary meeting was associated with a low incidence of cancer development, supporting the use of worrisome clinical and radiological features in the initial stratification of PCL.

Clinical and radiological features that predict malignant transformation in cystic lesions of the pancreas: a retrospective case note review

Background: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are being detected with increasing frequency. Current methods of stratifying risk of malignant transformation are imperfect. This study aimed to determine the frequency of pancreatic malignancy in patients with PCL and define clinical and radiological features that predict malignant transformation in patients managed by surgery and/or surveillance. Methods: A retrospective cohort of adults who were evaluated in a tertiary hepatopancreaticobiliary centre between January 2000 - December 2013 with a confirmed PCL and followed up for at least 5 years. All cystic lesions were discussed at a weekly multidisciplinary meeting. Results: Of the 1,090 patients diagnosed with a PCL, 768 patients were included in the study: 141 patients were referred for immediate pancreatic resection, 570 entered surveillance while 57 had a malignant PCL which was unresectable at diagnosis (n=47) or were unfit for surgery (n=10). In those who were resected following presentation, malignancy was present in 38%. During follow-up 2% of those entering a surveillance programme underwent malignant transformation. Clinical and radiological features associated with a high-risk PCL included older age, symptoms, associated solid component or dilated main pancreatic duct. In intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, larger size was not a feature of malignant transformation (benign vs. malignant 30mm vs. 23mm; P= 0.012). Conclusion: The sensitivity of standard diagnostic tests leading to immediate surgery for high-risk PCL (malignant or mucinous) was 92% but with a specificity of just 5%. Surveillance of PCL without high-risk features within a multidisciplinary meeting was associated with a low incidence of cancer development, supporting the use of worrisome clinical and radiological features in the initial stratification of PCL.

Clinical and radiological features that predict malignant transformation in cystic lesions of the pancreas: a retrospective case note review

Background: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are being detected with increasing frequency. Current methods of stratifying risk of malignant transformation are imperfect. This study aimed to determine the frequency of pancreatic malignancy in patients with PCL and define clinical and radiological features that predict malignant transformation in patients managed by surgery and/or surveillance. Methods: A retrospective cohort of adults who were evaluated in a tertiary hepatopancreaticobiliary centre between January 2000 - December 2013 with a confirmed PCL and followed up for at least 5 years. All cystic lesions were discussed at a weekly multidisciplinary meeting. Results: Of the 1,090 patients diagnosed with a PCL, 768 patients were included in the study: 141 patients were referred for immediate pancreatic resection, 570 entered surveillance while 57 had a malignant PCL which was unresectable at diagnosis (n=47) or were unfit for surgery (n=10). In those who were resected following presentation, malignancy was present in 38%. During follow-up 2% of those entering a surveillance programme underwent malignant transformation. Clinical and radiological features associated with a high-risk PCL included older age, symptoms, associated solid component or dilated main pancreatic duct. In intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, larger size was not a feature of malignant transformation (benign vs. malignant 30mm vs. 23mm; P= 0.012). Conclusion: The sensitivity of standard diagnostic tests leading to immediate surgery for high-risk PCL (malignant or mucinous) was 92% but with a specificity of just 5%. Surveillance of PCL without high-risk features within a multidisciplinary meeting was associated with a low incidence of cancer development, supporting the use of worrisome clinical and radiological features in the initial stratification of PCL.

A prospective comparison of conventional cytology and digital image analysis for the identification of pancreatic malignancy in patients undergoing EUS-FNA.

Background and Objectives:Digital image analysis (DIA) has been reported to be a sensitive method to detect pancreatic neoplasms by assessing nuclear DNA content. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DIA for pancreatic malignancy relative to conventional cytology (CC) in patients undergoing EUS-FNA.Patients and Methods:One hundred and forty-two patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy were enrolled prospectively in this study. FNA sample from each patient was evenly divided and assessed by CC and DIA. Findings from histopathology of FNA specimens and a minimum 12-month follow-up were used as the standard.Results:Total 102 out of 142 patients were determined as pancreatic cancer (PC) in this study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CC were 75%, 85%, and 78%, whereas the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DIA were 84%, 80%, and 83%, respectively. A combination of CC and DIA (CC/DIA) showed greater sensitivity than CC alone (92% vs. 75%, P < 0.01), but the specificity was reduced from 85% to 70% (P = 0.03).Conclusions:In this study, we demonstrated that DIA provided comparable diagnostic performance to CC in detecting PC. This objective diagnostic method, DIA, emerged as an important supplementary tool to endoscopic biopsy and cytology for diagnosing patients undergoing EUS-FNA with suspected pancreatic malignancy.

Incretin-based therapies and risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 6 recently published large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), to evaluate the risk of pancreatic cancer with incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). For the period January 1, 2007 to May 1, 2017, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register and ClininalTrials.gov databases were searched for RCTs in people with T2DM that compared incretin drugs with placebo or other antidiabetic drugs, with treatment and follow-up durations of ≥52 weeks. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias independently and in duplicate. A total of 33 studies (n = 79 971), including the 6 CVOTs, with 87 pancreatic cancer events were identified. Overall, the pancreatic cancer risk was not increased in patients administered incretin drugs compared with controls (Peto odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.02). In the 6 CVOTs, 79 pancreatic cancer events were identified in 55 248 participants. Pooled estimates of the 6 CVOTs showed an identical tendency (Peto OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-1.01). Notably, in the subgroup of participants who received treatment and follow-up for ≥104 weeks, 84 pancreatic cancer events were identified in 59 919 participants, and a lower risk of pancreatic cancer was associated with incretin-based therapies (Peto OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.95). Treatment with incretin drugs was not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in people with T2DM. Instead, it might protect against pancreatic malignancy in patients treated for ≥104 weeks.

Long-term Risk of Pancreatic Malignancy in Patients With Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm in a Referral Center

Little is known about the development of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs). We evaluated long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients with BD-IPMNs to determine risk of malignancy and define a subset of low-risk BD-IPMNs. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 577 patients with suspected or presumed BD-IPMN under surveillance at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Patients underwent cross-sectional imaging analysis at 3 months or later after their initial diagnosis. The diagnosis of BD-IPMN was based on the presence of unilocular or multilocular cysts of the pancreas and a non-dilated main pancreatic duct (<5 mm). We collected demographic, clinical, and pathology data. Cysts were characterized at the time of diagnosis and during the follow-up period. Follow-up duration was time between initial cyst diagnosis and date of last visit or death for patients without development of pancreatic cancer, date of surgery for patients with histologically confirmed malignancy, or date of first discovery of malignancy by imaging analysis for patients with unresectable tumors or who underwent neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. The primary outcome was risk of malignancy, with a focus on patients followed for 5 years or more, compared with that of the US population, based on standardized incidence ratio. Of the 577 patients studied, 479 (83%) were asymptomatic at diagnosis and 363 (63%) underwent endoscopic ultrasound at least once. The median follow-up time was 82 months (range, 6-329 months) for the entire study cohort; 363 patients (63%) underwent surveillance for more than 5 years, and 121 (21%) for more than 10 years. Malignancies (high-grade dysplasia or invasive neoplasm) developed after 5 years in 20 of 363 patients (5.5%), and invasive cancer developed in 16 of 363 patients (4.4%). The standardized incidence ratio for patients with BD-IPMNs without worrisome features of malignancy at 5 years was 18.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.7-32.8; P < .001). One hundred and eight patients had cysts ≤1.5 cm for more than 5 years of follow-up; only 1ofthese patients (0.9%) developed a distinct ductal adenocarcinoma. By contrast, among the 255 patients with cysts >1.5 cm, 19 (7.5%) developed malignancy (P= .01). In a retrospective analysis of patients with BD-IPMNs under surveillance, their overall risk of malignancy, almost 8%, lasted for 10 years or more, supporting continued surveillance after 5 years. Cysts that remain ≤1.5 cm for more than 5 years might be considered low-risk for progression to malignancy.

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic malignancy following an indeterminate multidetector CT scan: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis in part due to delayed diagnosis. Even with advances in cross-sectional imaging, small pancreatic malignancies can be missed. We sought to determine the performance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in those without an obvious mass on multi-detector CT scan (MDCT), but with clinical suspicion for pancreatic malignancy. Multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic performance of EUS after negative or inconclusive pancreatic protocol MDCT for detection of pancreatic malignancy when clinically suspected. A total of four studies met the inclusion criteria. The point estimates in each study were compared to the summary pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity with the aid of forest plots. Funnel plots and Egger's test were employed to evaluate possible publication bias. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration was performed in all studies. EUS was performed in 206 subjects with a clinical suspicion of a pancreatic mass but with an indeterminate MDCT. A pancreatic mass (mean size 21 ± 1.2mm) was identified in 70% (n = 144) of the subjects, and 42.2% (n = 87) were diagnosed with PDAC. The pooled estimates of EUS for diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of an indeterminate MDCT were a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 69-94%), specificity of 58% (95% CI 40-74%), positive predictive value of 77% (69-84%), negative predictive value of 66% (95% CI 53-77%), and an accuracy of 75% (95% CI 67-82). The summary area under the ROC curve was 0.80 (95% CI 0.52-0.89). The funnel plots and Egger's test did not show a significant publication bias. The yield of EUS is comparatively higher for the diagnosis of a pancreatic malignancy in patients with suspected cancer, but a non-diagnostic MDCT. Importantly, the majority of the lesions missed on CT represent PDAC, in which early diagnosis is essential.

Which patients with dilated common bile and/or pancreatic ducts have positive findings on EUS?

Patients with dilated common bile duct (CBD) (>7mm) and/or pancreatic duct (PD) on abdominal imaging are often referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). In many cases, the EUS shows no obvious etiology for the dilated ducts. Find clinical factors that may predict which patients are more likely to have positive findings on EUS to explain the etiologies for the dilated ducts. Retrospective database analysis. Tertiary-care university hospital. Patients referred for EUS for dilated CBD and/or PD from January 2004 to February 2010 were included in this study. Only patients without an obvious etiology for the dilated ducts on abdominal imaging were included. An EUS was performed by using either a radial echoendoscope or a linear endoscope to evaluate the common bile duct and/or the pancreatic duct. When appropriate fine needle aspiration of the mass or cyst was performed. The characteristics of patients who had positive findings on EUS to explain the etiology of their dilated PD and/or CBD. A total of 140 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 64 years, 51 (36%) male and 115 (82%) white. The majority of our patients had a presenting symptom of abdominal pain 105 (75%). 49 (36%) had elevated AST or ALT, 25 (8%) had an elevated bilirubin and 13 (23%) had an elevated lipase. EUS findings explained the dilated ducts in 54 (39%) of our patients, most common diagnoses included: CBD stone in 11 (8%), non-calcific chronic pancreatitis in 9 (6%), pancreatic mass in 8 (6%), IPMN in 7 (5%). On bivarate analysis patients who were older (p = 0.006), male (p = 0.001), had elevated LFTs (p = <0.001), had elevated lipase (p = 0.021) or had dilated CBD and PD (p = 0.007) were more likely to have an etiology for their dilated duct(s) discovered on EUS. A retrospective study with a small number of patients. Older patients, males and those patients presenting with concurrent elevations in the AST/ALT and/or lipase were more likely to have an underlying etiology discovered on EUS. Furthermore, EUS may detect an undiagnosed pancreatic malignancy in patients presenting with unexplained duct dilation.

M1455: Clinical Predictors of Pancreatic Malignancy in Patients >50 Years of Age With Non-Alcoholic/Non-Gallstone-Related Acute Pancreatitis

Idiopathic acute pancreatitis may be the first presentation of pancreatic cancer. We studied the clinical and radiological factors that could predict pancreatic cancer in patients with acute pancreatitis without an obvious relation to alcohol or gallstones.

Periductal hypoechoic sign: an endosonographic finding associated with pancreatic malignancy

Despite advances in imaging, differentiating benign from malignant causes of pancreatic duct dilation is difficult. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of the periductal hypoechoic sign (PHS), defined as patchy hypoechoic areas adjacent to a dilated pancreatic duct, for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy. Single-center, retrospective analysis. Tertiary care university hospital. All patients who underwent EUS from 2006 to 2008 for evaluation of pancreatic pathology were identified. Those with pancreatic duct dilation of 4 mm or more in the head of the pancreas or 3 mm or more in the body or tail were included. Digitally recorded EUS images were analyzed for PHS by 1 endoscopist blinded to final results. The final diagnosis was based on pathology results or clinical follow-up. During the study period, 84 of 427 patients who underwent EUS for pancreas pathology had dilated pancreatic ducts. Of these, 42 patients had benign disease and 42 had pancreatic malignancy. The PHS was noted in 31 (73.8%) of 42 patients with malignancy compared with 6 (14.3%) of 42 patients with benign disease (P < .001). The PHS had a sensitivity of 73.8%, a specificity of 85.7%, and an accuracy of 79.8% for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy. After adjusting for age, patients with the PHS were 17 times more likely to have a malignancy (odds ratio 16.66; 95% CI, 5.01-55.44). Pancreatic duct diameter or dilation of both bile and pancreatic ducts were not predictive of malignancy. A retrospective design. The PHS was an accurate and independent predictor of pancreatic malignancy in patients with a dilated pancreatic duct.

Sensitivity of EUS-Guided Biopsy of Malignant Pancreatic Solid Masses in Biopsy-Naïve Vs Rescue Patients

Background: Prior studies have shown sensitivity of EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses ranging from 71 to 92%, but there has been little data on those patients who already had a failed biopsy attempt. The aim of this single-center retrospective cohort study was to measure and compare the sensitivities of EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses in patients undergoing their first biopsy (biopsy-naïve EUS) and in those who previously had a biopsy nondiagnostic for malignancy (rescue EUS). Methods: From March 2004 to November 2007, 164 consecutive patients with a final diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy underwent EUS-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses suspicious for malignancy. EUS was performed by one operator using a linear array echoendoscope; a 22G FNA needle was used in all patients, and a 19 G core needle biopsy was performed when deemed technically feasible. Results: The biopsy-naïve (n = 124) and rescue EUS (n = 40) groups had similar patient and tumor characteristics, including location of tumor (head/uncinate vs body/neck/tail) (p = 0.13), size of tumor (p = 0.12), and patient age (p = 0.71). There was a statistically significant difference in the number of FNA passes, with more passes in the rescue EUS group (7.3 vs 6.3, p = 0.002). In only one case was malignancy found by core needle biopsy after a nondiagnostic FNA. The overall sensitivity for malignancy in all patients was 89% (146/164). Of the 124 patients who were biopsy-naïve, 115 had a positive diagnosis of malignancy made by EUS-guided biopsy, for a sensitivity of 92.7%. Of the 40 patients who had a failed prior biopsy, 35 failed CT-guided biopsy, 3 failed EUS-guided biopsy, and 2 failed surgical biopsy. 31/40 had a positive diagnosis of malignancy made by EUS-guided biopsy, for a sensitivity of 77.5%. The sensitivity in biopsy-naïve patients was statistically significantly superior to that in patients undergoing rescue EUS (p = 0.01, Fisher exact). Conclusions: The sensitivity of EUS-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses in this study is consistent with prior reports, but it was statistically significantly higher in those patients undergoing their first biopsy. This was the case despite significantly more FNA passes in the rescue group, supporting the difficulty in obtaining diagnostic specimen after having already failed one modality. Nonetheless, the sensitivity of 77.5% for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy in patients with a prior nondiagnostic biopsy is still above published reports of 71% (Savides T, et al. GIE, 2007;66(2):277-82) and should be considered a reasonable option for patients in whom a diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy is still being entertained.