Pancreas Donor Risk Index Research Articles

Usefulness of Pancreas Donor Risk Index and Pre-Procurement Pancreas Allocation Suitability Score: Results of the Polish National Study.

BackgroundPre-procurement pancreas suitability score (P-PASS) and pancreas donor risk (PDRI) index are scoring systems believed to predict suitability of pancreatic grafts. Most European countries and the United States apply PDRI, while Poltransplant keeps using P-PASS: more than 16 points raises a red flag for graft use. Recent data discourage use of PDRI to predict pancreas graft survival. The aim of the present study was to assess PDRI and P-PASS as predictors of transplanted pancreas survival in a Polish population.Material/MethodsFrom February 1998 to September 2015, 407 pancreas transplantations were performed in Poland: 370 (90.9%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and 37 (9.1%) pancreas transplantation alone or pancreas after kidney. The endpoint was death-uncensored 12-month graft survival with satisfactory glycemic control without insulin.ResultsAverage P-PASS was 15.9±2.66 and PDRI was 0.96±0.37. Recipients who survived 12 months with good graft function had an average P-PASS score of 15.7 and PDRI of 0.95. Recipients with death-uncensored graft loss had a mean P-PASS of 16.4 and PDRI of 0.99. Univariate analysis revealed donor age, body mass index (BMI), and P-PASS to be significant risk factors for 1-year pancreas graft survival.ConclusionsP-PASS, but not PDRI, is a reliable tool to predict pancreas graft survival in the Polish population.

Intraoperative Heparinization During Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: Is It Really Necessary?

IntroductionThe use of intraoperative sodium heparin during simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) remains as a routine practice in some referral centers to minimize pancreatic graft thrombosis rate. One of its disadvantages is the theoretical increased risk of postoperative bleeding. In our center, we have abandoned its use since 2011. Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis among 198 SPKTs performed in our center between the years 1989 and 2017. The variables of our study were vascular thrombosis of the pancreatic graft and hemoperitoneum and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the mediate postoperative period (up to 2 months after the transplant). We compared these results between SPKT recipients who had undergone intraoperative heparinization (n = 157) and those who had not (n = 51). To avoid bias, a second comparison was performed using propensity score matching on the following characteristics: sex, recipient age, recipient body mass index, cold ischemia time, preoperative hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, time of diabetes, and Pancreas Donor Risk Index. Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for intergroup comparisons of quantitative variables where appropriate, whereas χ2 or Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical data. ResultsNo statistically significant differences were found when comparing the use of intraoperative heparin, even after the homogenization of both groups. ConclusionsIn our experience, intraoperative heparinization during SPKT surgery was not useful because it did not significantly decrease the graft thrombosis rate, and its withdrawal did not enhance hemoperitoneum or upper gastrointestinal bleeding postoperative rates.

Pancreas Transplantation With Grafts From Donors Deceased After Circulatory Death: 5 Years Single-Center Experience.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) pancreas transplantation has been shown to be an additional way to deal with donor organ shortages. The results of 5-year DCD pancreas transplantation are presented. A retrospective, single-center analysis (2011-2015) was performed to compare the results of donation after brain death (DBD) to DCD pancreas transplantation. During the study period, 104 pancreas transplantations (83 from DBD and 21 from DCD) were performed. Median Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI) was 1.47, (DBD, 1.61 vs DCD, 1.35; P = 0.144). Without the factor DCD, PDRI from DCD donors was significantly lower (DBD, 1.61 vs DCD, 0.97; P < 0.001). Donor age was the only donor-related risk factor associated with pancreas graft survival (Hazard ratio, 1.06; P = 0.037). Postoperative bleeding and kidney delayed graft function occurred more frequently in recipients from DCD (P = 0.006). However, DCD pancreata had a lower incidence of thrombosis. Kidney and pancreas graft survival were equally good in both groups. Pancreas transplantation from DCD donors yields comparable results to DBD donors when PDRI of DCD is relatively low. Most DCD donors are younger donors with trauma as cause of death. These DCD pancreas grafts may be a better option to cope with increasing organ shortages than exploring the limits with older (and higher PDRI) DBD donors.

The Value of PDRI and P-PASS as Predictors of Outcome After Pancreas Transplantation in a Large European Pancreas Transplantation Center.

In 2008, the preprocurement pancreas suitability score (P-PASS) was introduced within Eurotransplant to predict suitability of pancreas donors. A P-PASS of 17 or higher would have lower graft survival compared with pancreatic grafts from donors with a P-PASS lower than 17. In 2010, a continuous model, the pancreas donor risk index (PDRI), was designed. Before using this model in the European donor population, it has to be validated in the European setting. In this study, P-PASS and PDRI were validated using the results of all pancreas transplants performed at our center. The P-PASS and PDRI were compared as both continuous and dichotomous values. The original cutoff point of 17 divided P-PASS groups. Median PDRI (1.24) divided PDRI groups. In total, 349 pancreas transplantations were performed. The P-PASS of 17 or higher was not associated with graft survival (P = 0.448). The PDRI of 1.24 or higher was associated with reduced graft survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.007) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.002). The PDRI concordance index was 0.69. The P-PASS has no predictive value for pancreas graft survival and should not be used in clinical decision making. The PDRI is a significant predictor of pancreas graft survival but should be used carefully, because good results can be achieved with grafts from high-PDRI donors.

Pancreas.

Even though pancreas transplant numbers have steadily declined over the past decade, new listings increased in 2014 compared with the previous year, notably for pancreas transplant alone (PTA) and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. The number of new PTAs also increased over the past two years. Whether this is a sustainable trend remains to be seen. Significant events in 2014 included implementation of a new pancreas allocation system and development of a proposed uniform definition of pancreas graft failure. Meanwhile, overall pancreas transplant rates and outcomes continued to improve. Substantial decline in pancreas after kidney transplants remains a serious concern. SRTR has not published pancreas graft failure data in the program-specific reports for the past two years. While this will not change in the near future, the acceptance of a uniform definition of graft failure is a crucial first step toward resuming graft failure reporting. Continued improvements and innovation, both surgical and immunological, will be critical to keep pancreas transplant as a viable option for treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes. As alternative therapies for diabetes such as islet transplant and artificial pancreas are evolving, improved outcomes with minimizations of complications are more important than ever.

Thirty Years of Pancreas Transplantation at Leiden University Medical Center: Long-term Follow-up in a Large Eurotransplant Center.

An overview of 30 years of pancreas transplantation at a high volume center. Analysis of patient survival- and graft survival-associated risk factors. All pancreas transplantations performed in our center from January 1, 1984, till December 31, 2012, were evaluated. Covariates influencing pancreas graft survival were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis. In the study period, 349 pancreas transplantations were performed. With the introduction of modern induction therapy in 1999, 5-year patient survival improved to 92.0% (P = 0.003). Five-year pancreas graft survival improved to 80.3% (P = 0.026). Pancreas graft survival was influenced by left or right donor kidney, transplant type, local origin of procurement team, pancreas cold ischemia time, recipient cerebrovascular disease. Pancreas donor risk index increased to 1.39 over the years and pancreas donor risk index 1.24 or higher is a risk factor for graft survival (P = 0.007). This study has shown excellent results in patient and pancreas graft survivals after 30 years of pancreas transplantation in a high volume center. Different donor, transplant, and recipient related risk factors influence pancreas graft survival. Even with higher risk pancreas donors, good results can be achieved.

Who needs a pancreas donor risk index?

Who needs a pancreas donor risk index?

Validation of the Pancreas Donor Risk Index for use in a UK population.

Pancreas graft failure rates remain substantial. The PDRI can be used at the time of organ offering, to predict one-year graft survival. This study aimed to validate the PDRI for a UK population. Data for 1021 pancreas transplants were retrieved from a national database for all pancreas transplants. Cases were categorized by PDRI quartile and compared for death-censored graft survival. Significant differences were observed between the UK and US cohorts. The PDRI accurately discriminated graft survival for SPK and was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.52 (P=0.009) in this group. However, in the PTA and PAK groups, no association between PDRI quartile and graft survival was observed. This is the largest study to validate the PDRI in a European cohort and has shown for the first time that the PDRI can be used as a tool to predict graft survival in SPK transplantation, but not PTA or PAK transplantation.

App to reality: snapshot validation of the US Pancreas Donor Risk Index in a UK center

BackgroundA pancreas donor risk index (PDRI) has been derived by Axelrod et al. to inform organ acceptance and developed into a smartphone app by Marc Melcher. This paper aims to validate the app for use in a single UK transplant center through a snapshot of donors and outcomes during one calendar year. MethodsDonor details for all pancreas transplants performed in 2011 were collected from a prospectively maintained clinical database to calculate a PDRI using the Pancreas Transplant Donor Risk Index smartphone app. ResultsNinety pancreas transplants were included in the analysis (72 simultaneous pancreas kidney [SPK], 18 pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). PDRI scores were found to be positively skewed compared with donors described in the US literature. The PDRI was predictive of poorer 1-y graft outcome in the SPK group but not in the PTA group. PDRI was not predictive of time to failure or failure cause. ConclusionValidation of the PDRI app against data from our center shows that it can be used as a tool to predict poorer graft outcome in the SPK group. However, it was not predictive in the PTA group, and differences in US and UK donor characteristics were evident. Development of a UK-specific PDRI may overcome these limitations.

Systematic Evaluation of Pancreas Allograft Quality, Outcomes and Geographic Variation in Utilization

Pancreas allograft acceptance is markedly more selective than other solid organs. The number of pancreata recovered is insufficient to meet the demand for pancreas transplants (PTx), particularly for patients awaiting simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplant. Development of a pancreas donor risk index (PDRI) to identify factors associated with an increased risk of allograft failure in the context of SPK, pancreas after kidney (PAK) or pancreas transplant alone (PTA), and to assess variation in allograft utilization by geography and center volume was undertaken. Retrospective analysis of all PTx performed from 2000 to 2006 (n = 9401) was performed using Cox regression controlling for donor and recipient characteristics. Ten donor variables and one transplant factor (ischemia time) were subsequently combined into the PDRI. Increased PDRI was associated with a significant, graded reduction in 1-year pancreas graft survival. Recipients of PTAs or PAKs whose organs came from donors with an elevated PDRI (1.57-2.11) experienced a lower rate of 1-year graft survival (77%) compared with SPK transplant recipients (88%). Pancreas allograft acceptance varied significantly by region particularly for PAK/PTA transplants (p < 0.0001). This analysis demonstrates the potential value of the PDRI to inform organ acceptance and potentially improve the utilization of higher risk organs in appropriate clinical settings.