Palliative Radiotherapy Research Articles

High Symptom Burden in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Factors Associated with Being Offered an Intervention.

Patient report outcomes are commonly collected during oncology visits to elicit symptom burden and guide management. We aimed to determine the frequency of intervention for patients undergoing radiotherapy with high symptom complexity scores and identify which factors are associated with being offered an intervention. A retrospective chart audit was completed of adult patients with cancer who had at least one radiotherapy appointment and were assigned a high symptom complexity. A total of 200 patients were included; 150 (75.0%) patients were offered an intervention for the main symptom. The most offered intervention was medications. Multivariable logistic regression showed factors associated with being offered an intervention were the following: symptom score of 9 (OR = 9.56, 95% CI 1.64-62.8) and 10 (OR = 7.90, 95% CI 1.69-38.2); palliative intent radiation (OR 3.87, 96% CI 1.46-11.1); and last review appointment (OR 6.22, 95% CI 1.84-23.3). Symptoms associated with being offered an intervention included pain (OR 22.6, 95% CI 6.47-91.1), nausea (OR 15.7, 95% CI 1.51-412), shortness of breath (OR 7.97, 95% CI 1.20-63.7), and anxiety (OR 6.69, 95% CI 1.58-31.6). This knowledge will help guide clinical practice to understand symptom burden and how we can improve our management of patients' symptoms.

Partially Ablative Body Radiotherapy (PABR): A novel approach for palliative radiotherapy of locally advanced bulky unresectable sarcomas

BackgroundLocally advanced, bulky, unresectable sarcomas cause significant tumour mass effects, leading to burdensome symptoms. We have developed a novel Partially Ablative Body Radiotherapy (PABR) technique that delivers a high, ablative dose to the tumour core and a low, palliative dose to its periphery aiming to increase overall tumour response without significantly increasing treatment toxicity. AimThis study aims to report the safety and oncologic outcomes of PABR in patients with bulky, unresectable sarcomas. Methods and materialsA total of 18 patients with histologically proven sarcoma treated with PABR from January 2020 to October 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoints were symptomatic and structural response rates. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, freedom from local progression, freedom from distant progression, and acute and late toxicity rates. ResultsAll patients had tumours ≥5 cm with a median tumour volume of 985 cc, and the most common symptom was pain. The median age is 72.5 years and 44.5 % were ECOG 2–3. The most common regimen used was 20 Gy in 5 fractions with an intratumoral boost dose of 50 Gy (83.3 %). After a median follow-up of 11 months, 88.9 % of patients exhibited a partial response with a mean absolute tumour volume reduction of 49.5 %. All symptomatic patients experienced symptom improvement. One-year OS, FFLP and FFDP were 61 %, 83.3 % and 34.8 %, respectively. There were no grade 3 or higher toxicities. ConclusionPABR for bulky, unresectable sarcomas appears to be safe and may provide good symptomatic response, tumour debulking, and local control. Further study is underway.

A 15-Year Single-Institution Retrospective Study of Primary Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Non-Ablative Palliative Radiotherapy.

We studied the use of palliative radiotherapy (RT) among patients with primary, non-curable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In this subset of patients, with very poor survival, various palliative RT dose fractionation schemes are used; but, in the absence of a guideline, practice patterns vary, and dose choice is mainly based on the physician's intuition. We divided the patients into three groups, according to the dose fractionation schedules received: low (A), intermediate (B), and high (C) dose groups, to study the potential differences in outcome between the different dose prescriptions. Cohort: n = 184. Median age: 69 years. Male: n = 105 (57%), female: n = 79 (43%). Stage IV: n = 117 (64%). T4: n = 127 (69%). Tumor location: head: n = 109 (59%), body: n = 37 (20%), tail: n = 25 (14%), neck: n = 11 (6%), and uncinate: n = 2 (1%). Prior systemic therapy: n = 66 (36%). Most common dose fractionations received: 20 Gy in five fractions n = 67 (36%), 30 Gy in 10 fractions n = 49 (27%), and 8 Gy in one fraction n = 23 (13%). Group A: n = 33 (18%), median overall survival (OS) 19 days (95% CI 4-33). Group B: n = 84 (46%), median OS 52 days (95% CI 43-60). Group C: n = 67 (36%), median OS 126 days (95% CI 77-174). Median days to in-field progression: Group A 59 days (range 7-109), Group B 96 days (range 19-173), and Group C 97 days (range 13-475). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported retrospective cohort of patients receiving non-ablative palliative RT to treat their primary pancreatic tumors. Most patients had metastatic disease, T4 tumors of the pancreatic head and had not received prior systemic therapy. A significant survival benefit was seen favoring the high dose/longer RT fractionation group, presumably due to appropriate patient selection rather than an RT effect. Despite the relatively short median overall survival, one fifth of the patients were found to experience an in-field progression following RT.

Palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer: a single center retrospective study

PurposeThis retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer.Materials and methodsWe enrolled patients with painful non-bone lesions who underwent conventional palliative radiotherapy between September 2018 and September 2022. The treatment targets included primary tumor lesions, lymph node metastases, non-bone hematogenous metastases, and other lesions. The primary endpoint was the overall pain response rate in evaluable patients, determined based on the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoint criteria. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, pain recurrence, and adverse events.ResultsOf the 420 screened patients, 142 received palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions, and 112 were evaluable. A pain response was achieved in 67 patients (60%) of the 112 evaluable patients within a median of 1.2 months. Among these patients, 25 exhibited complete response, 42 partial response, 18 indeterminate response, and 27 pain progression. The median survival time was 5.5 months, recorded at a median follow-up of 6.0 months, during which 67 patients died. Multivariate analysis identified poor performance status scores of 2–4, opioid use, and re-irradiation as independent factors associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving a pain response. Pain recurrence occurred in 18 patients over a median of 4.1 months. Seventeen patients had grade 1–2 adverse events, while none experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity.ConclusionPalliative radiotherapy can potentially be a safe and well-tolerated modality for managing painful non-bone lesions, with a low rate of adverse events.

Renal Collision Tumor: A Case of Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastasis to Renal Angiomyolipoma.

A 68-year-old woman presented with chest pain and shortness of breath. Imaging revealed a left hilar mass biopsy-proven as small cell cancer. Concurrently, a macroscopic fat-containing renal lesion consistent with an angiomyolipoma was observed. Systemic therapy achieved stability in the lungs and bones, and palliative radiation targeted the left hilum. However, progressive lung disease and brain metastases necessitated stereotactic radiosurgery for brain lesions. Notably, the renal angiomyolipoma exhibited increased soft tissue component and new focal uptake on FDG PET/CT. Biopsy confirmed metastatic small cell lung cancer within the renal lesion. This case highlights a rare occurrence of a renal collision tumor involving small cell cancer and angiomyolipoma.

Variation in Access to Palliative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study in Canada.

As a result of improvements in cancer therapies, patients with metastatic malignancies are living longer, and the role of palliative radiotherapy has become increasingly recognized. However, access to adequate palliative radiotherapy may continue to be a challenge, as is evident from the high proportion of patients dying of prostate cancer who never receive palliative radiotherapy. The main objective of this investigation is to identify and describe the factors associated with the receipt of palliative radiation treatment in a decedent cohort of prostate cancer patients in Ontario. Population-based administrative databases from Ontario, Canada, were used to identify prostate cancer decedents, 65 years or older who received androgen deprivation therapy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018. Baseline and treatment characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for association with receipt of radiotherapy in a two-year observation period before death. We identified 3,788 prostate cancer decedents between 2013 and 2018; among these, 49.9% received radiotherapy in the two years preceding death. There were statistically significant positive associations between receipt of radiotherapy and younger age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.3); higher stage at diagnosis (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.7); receipt of care at a regional cancer center (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.4); and involvement of radiation oncologists (OR 155.1, 95% CI 83.3-288.7)or medical oncologists (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). However, there were no associations between receipt of radiotherapy and income, distance to the nearest cancer center, involvement of urologists in cancer care, healthcare administrative region, home-care involvement, or number of hospitalizations in the observation period. We found the utilization of palliative radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients in Ontario varies depending on age, stage at diagnosis, number of comorbidities, registration at regional cancer centers, and involvement of oncologists. There were no differences detected based on incomeor distance from a cancer center. The findings of this study represent an important opportunity to facilitate better access to palliative radiotherapy and referrals to multidisciplinary regional cancer centers, to improve the quality of life of this patient population.

Rural-urban disparities and trends in utilization of palliative care services among US patients with metastatic breast cancer.

To assess trends and rural-urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer. We analyzed data from the 2004-2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as "yes/no." Rural-urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as "rural/urban/metropolitan." Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural-urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD=14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004-2005 to 24.5% in 2008-2019 (7.0% increase per year; p-value for trend <0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (p<0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98) or metropolitan (AOR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas. In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural-urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.

Incidence of Different Characters of Neuropathic Pain in Cancer Patients Coming to Tertiary Care Centre in North India Over A Period of 1 Year - An Observational Study.

Pain is classified as nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic. Neuropathic pain presents as variable phenotypes (characters) based on specific aetiology and pathophysiology. This study aimed to find out among cancer patients the incidence of different phenotypes of neuropathic pain and form specific phenotypic clusters based on the underlying neurophysiology and association of sensory profile with various organ systems - A prospective observational study. The Institutional Ethical Committee clearance (IEC code: 2020-49-MD-EXP-15) https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=44886&EncHid=88651.15716&userName=CTRI/2020/09/027964 approval was obtained. After written and informed consent, patients of age group 18-80 years, registering in the pain and palliative outpatient department or radiotherapy department with complaints of pain and not taking any anti-neuropathic pain medications, were enrolled. They were assessed using Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) pain score, and a score of >12 was eligible for assessment of neuropathic pain phenotypes. Out of 210 cancer patients complaining of pain, a neuropathic component with LANSS >12 was found in 73 (34.76%). The most predominant phenotypes, allodynia> tingling> pricking = burning, were found in 72.60%, 56.16%, and 43.84% of patients, respectively. Phenotypes were clustered into Nodes 1 and 2 based on clinically significant separation of phenotypes. Node 1 had neuropathic pain of spontaneous origin found predominantly in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and genitourinary tract (GUT) cancers. Node 2 had stimulus-evoked negative and positive characters which occurred in head and neck, thoracic, and spinal metastatic cancers. Careful patient assessment reveals the incidence of neuropathic pain in 34.76%; allodynia and tingling astable the most prominent phenotypes. Broadly, sensory characters were clustered into spontaneous and stimulus-evoked sensations with GIT and GUT cancers presenting with Node 1 symptoms.

Cutaneous metastasis in a case of carcinoma floor of mouth- A rare case report

The incidence of cutaneous metastasis in head and neck cancers is less than 1%. Carcinoma of the oral cavity is one of the most common cancers of the head neck region with frequent metastasis to internal organs, especially the lungs, liver, and bone.We present a case of Carcinoma of floor of mouth with cutaneous metastasis.A 55 year old lady presented to our department with complaints of non-healing ulcer in the oral cavity and ulcerated nodules over neck and chest. On examination, mouth opening tongue mobility was restricted with grade 2 trismus. An ulcer in left gb sulcus, bilateral lymphadenopathy and multiple ulcerated skin nodules on neck and chest wall were noted. CECT Face and Neck showed heterogenously ehancing mass at the floor of mouth involving left buccal mucosa and erosion of mandible, lymph node mets and skin nodules. ECOGPS was 1.She was treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy and thereafter Palliative radiation. Now she is having stable disease and is on metronomic chemotherapy with regular follow up.Our case has highlighted that cutaneous metastasis can be seen in the cancers of floor of mouth. Palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy can significantly increase Progression free survival and hence the Quality of life of patients with such presentation.

Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases

Conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are commonly used treatment options for relieving metastatic bone pain. The effectiveness of SBRT compared with cEBRT in pain relief has been a subject of debate, and conflicting results have been reported. To compare the effectiveness associated with SBRT vs cEBRT for relieving metastatic bone pain. A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on June 5, 2023. Additionally, results were added from a new randomized clinical trial (RCT) and additional unpublished data from an already published RCT. Comparative studies reporting pain response after SBRT vs cEBRT in patients with painful bone metastases. Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Data were extracted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Overall and complete pain response at 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy, according to the study's definition. Relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each study. A random-effects model using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied for meta-analysis. There were 18 studies with 1685 patients included in the systematic review and 8 RCTs with 1090 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 7 RCTs, overall pain response was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints in clinical trials (ICPRE). The complete pain response was reported in 6 RCTs, all defined according to the ICPRE. The ITT meta-analyses showed that the overall pain response rates did not differ between cEBRT and SBRT at 1 (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30), 3 (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.47), or 6 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96-1.54) months. However, SBRT was associated with a higher complete pain response at 1 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01), 3 (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.78), and 6 (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.91) months after radiotherapy. The PP meta-analyses showed comparable results. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with painful bone metastases experienced similar overall pain response after SBRT compared with cEBRT. More patients had complete pain alleviation after SBRT, suggesting that selected subgroups will benefit from SBRT.

Evaluation of Different Regimens of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Symptomatic Bone Metastases: An Audit From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Jharkhand, India.

Background This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different radiation therapy regimens in treating patients with symptomatic bone metastases. Methodology A retrospective study was conducted by assigning patients with symptomatic bone metastases from different primary cancers into three groups, namely, Arms A, B, and C. The radiation dose delivered in each arm was as follows: 8 Gray (Gy) in a single fraction for Arm A, 20 Gy in five fractions at the rate of 4 Gy per fraction for Arm B, and 30 Gy in 10 fractions at the rate of 3 Gy per fraction for Arm C. Each arm consisted of 15 patients. A comparison was conducted across all three arms to evaluate pain relief based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), performance score improvement based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and analgesic requirement based on the World Health Organization (WHO) step ladder at one week, one month, and three months. Results The pain relief was measured using the VAS in three different arms, i.e., Arm A, B, and C. After one week, the pain relief was 66.67%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. After one month, it was 73.33% in all three arms. At three months, it was 80%, 86.67%, and 86.67%, respectively. The study also measured the improvement in the ECOG performance score. The improvement in all three arms was 60% after one week and 66.67% in Arm A and 73.33% in Arms B and C after one month. After three months, the improvement was 73.33%, 80%, and 80% in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. The decrease in analgesic usage was also measured in all three arms. After one week, it was 60% in all three arms. After one month, it was 66.67%, 73.33%, and 73.33% in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. At three months, it was 73.33%, 80%, and 80% in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. No significant statistical difference was found between the three arms. Conclusions The efficacy of a single 8 Gy arm was almost equivalent to that of other arms of multifractionated regimens in terms of improvement in pain and performance score and decreased use of analgesics for a short duration of follow-up. For high-volume cancer centers and patients with economic constraints, a single-fraction regime provides effective palliation for painful bone metastases.

Establishment of Twinning Partnership to Improve Pediatric Radiotherapy Outcomes Globally.

Pediatric radiotherapy is a necessary and challenging component of oncologic care for children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Collaboration between institutions in LMICs and high-income countries (HICs) has been shown to be effective in improving oncologic treatment outcomes; however, literature regarding pediatric radiotherapy twinning partnerships is limited. Emory University has a long-standing twinning collaboration with Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) for certain medical specialties. After securing institutional funding, a faculty member and a resident from the Emory University Department of Radiation Oncology set out to establish a twinning program with TASH for pediatric radiotherapy. Emory and TASH faculty and residents established initial communications virtually via email and video correspondence. TASH residents and faculty completed surveys regarding pediatric radiotherapy institutional and educational needs to outline goals of collaboration. Five lectures and case-based practicums were identified focused on Wilms tumor, medulloblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and palliative radiotherapy. The Emory team then conducted a visit to TASH during which lectures and practicums were delivered. The Emory team directly observed and guided simulation and treatment planning procedures. TASH residents practiced decision making, simulation, contouring, and field placement for Wilms tumor cases on the basis of didactics and feedback provided by the Emory team. Additionally, a needs assessment regarding pediatric oncologic resources was completed. Clinical care pathways and standard operating procedures were drafted by collaborators. Virtual peer-review sessions were established to continue collaborations abroad and plan for next in-person visit. Collaborative efforts by global experts have helped to establish and improve treatment protocols for childhood cancer. The presented twinning experience may serve as a model for other LMIC and HIC centers for establishing similar partnerships.

Outcome of Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy Regimens for Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer in Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Ethiopia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are the third most commonly treated cancer with radiation in Ethiopia. Most patients present with advanced stage and are not candidates for curative treatment. The objective of our study is to assess the outcome of hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy (RT) for advanced HNCs in a resource-limited setting. Patients with histology-proven advanced HNC candidates for hypofractionated palliative RT were enrolled. Three regimens were allowed: 44.4 Gy in 12 fractions, 30 Gy in 10 fractions, and 20 Gy in five fractions. Response to treatment was assessed at baseline and at 4 weeks after treatment completion. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to measure the survival. Between January 2022 and January 2023, 52 patients were enrolled and 25 patients were eligible for outcome assessment. Index symptoms include pain, bleeding, dysphagia, respiratory distress, and others in 25, 13, 10, 6, and 17 patients, respectively. Complete relief of the top three symptoms include pain in 52% of patients, hemostasis in 84% of patients, and dysphagia in 30% of patients. Objectively, 64% of patients attained partial response. For 48% of patients, their quality of life (QoL) improved in one parameter of the physical scores. Moreover, 64% of patients showed improvement in three parameters. The global functional score improved in 80% of patients. One patient had grade 3 xerostomia. At the end of the study period, 44% of patients died. The median survival after radiation was 9 months (95% CI, 7.2 to 10.8). All palliative hypofractionated regimens used were effective in terms of symptom control, tumor response rate, and QoL, and were well tolerated. This makes it appropriate for our setup because the majority of patients require palliation.

Radiochemotherapy and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer: clinical results and patient-reported outcome measures

ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical results and long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on quality of life in cervical cancer patients following radiochemotherapy (RCT) and brachytherapy (BT) as definitive treatment.Materials and methodsBetween 2003 and 2023, a total of 132 patients with advanced cervical cancer were evaluated for possible treatment. Patients treated by postoperative RCT, palliative radiotherapy, and those treated for recurrent disease were excluded. Thus, 46 patients receiving standard RCT and BT as their curative treatment were included in this study. PROMs were assessed prospectively by patients’ self-completion of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-CX24 questionnaires.ResultsFive-year overall survival (OS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and pelvic tumor-free survival rates (PTFS) were 53%, 54%, and 83%, respectively. A significant impact on OS was seen for FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologic Oncology) stage (IIB–IIIA: 79% vs. IIIB–IVA: 33%, p = 0.015), for overall treatment time (OTT; 50–65 d: 64% vs. > 65 d: 38%, p = 0.004), and for rectal D2cc (≤ 73 Gy: 50% vs. > 73 Gy: 38%, p = 0.046). The identical parameters were significantly associated with DMFS (FIGO stage: p = 0.012, OTT: p = 0.008, D2cc: p = 0.024). No parameters with a significant influence on PTFS were seen. In multivariate analysis, an impact of FIGO stage on OS (p = 0.05) and DMFS (p = 0.014) was detected, and of rectal D2cc on DMFS (p = 0.031). The overall QoL score was 63/100. Cognitive function was the least impaired (84/100), while role functioning was the worst (67/100). On the symptom scale, insomnia (46/100), fatigue (41/100), dyspnea (32/100), pain (26/100), and financial difficulties (25/100) were scored the worst. According to EORTC-QLQ-CX24, peripheral neuropathy (36/100) and lymphedema (32/100) occurred most frequently. Impaired sexual/vaginal functioning (32/100) and body image (22/100) were also frequently recorded.ConclusionIn patients with advanced cervical cancer, a combination of RCT and BT remains an excellent treatment option. In terms of patient-reported long-term quality of life, specific support is needed to alleviate symptoms including lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy, and impaired sexual activity.

Unilateral hippocampal sparing during whole brain radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases: narrative and critical review.

The landscape of brain metastases radiotherapy is evolving, with a shift away from whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) toward targeted stereotactic approaches aimed at preserving neurocognitive functions and maintaining overall quality of life. For patients with multiple metastases, especially in cases where targeted radiotherapy is no longer feasible due to widespread dissemination, the concept of hippocampal sparing radiotherapy (HA_WBRT) gains prominence. In this narrative review we explore the role of the hippocampi in memory formation and the implications of their postradiotherapy lateral damage. We also consider the potential advantages of selectively sparing one hippocampus during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Additionally, by systematic evaluation of relevant papers published on PubMed database over last 20 years, we provide a comprehensive overview of the various changes that can occur in the left or right hippocampus as a consequence of radiotherapy. While it is important to note that various neurocognitive functions are interconnected throughout the brain, we can discern certain specialized roles of the hippocampi. The left hippocampus appears to play a predominant role in verbal memory, whereas the right hippocampus is associated more with visuospatial memory. Additionally, the anterior part of the hippocampus is more involved in episodic memory and emotional processing, while the posterior part is primarily responsible for spatial memory and pattern separation. Notably, a substantial body of evidence demonstrates a significant correlation between post-radiotherapy changes in the left hippocampus and subsequent cognitive decline in patients. In the context of individualized palliative radiotherapy, sparing the unilateral (specifically, the left, which is dominant in most individuals) hippocampus could expand the repertoire of strategies available for adapted WBRT in cases involving multiple brain metastases where stereotactic radiotherapy is not a viable option. Prospective ongoing studies assessing various memory-sparing radiotherapy techniques will define new standard of radiotherapy care of patients with multiple brain metastases.

Evaluating AI-generated CBCT-based synthetic CT images for target delineation in palliative treatments of pelvic bone metastasis at conventional C-arm linacs

PurposeOne-table treatments with treatment imaging, preparation and delivery occurring at one treatment couch, could increase patients’ comfort and throughput for palliative treatments. On regular C-arm linacs, however, cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging quality is currently insufficient. Therefore, our goal was to assess the suitability of AI-generated CBCT based synthetic CT (sCT) images for target delineation and treatment planning for palliative radiotherapy. Materials and methodsCBCTs and planning CT-scans of 22 female patients with pelvic bone metastasis were included. For each CBCT, a corresponding sCT image was generated by a deep learning model in ADMIRE 3.38.0. Radiation oncologists delineated 23 target volumes (TV) on the sCTs (TVsCT) and scored their delineation confidence. The delineations were transferred to planning CTs and manually adjusted if needed to yield gold standard target volumes (TVclin). TVsCT were geometrically compared to TVclin using Dice coefficient (DC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). The dosimetric impact of TVsCT inaccuracies was evaluated for VMAT plans with different PTV margins. ResultsRadiation oncologists scored the sCT quality as sufficient for 13/23 TVsCT (median: DC = 0.9, HD = 11 mm) and insufficient for 10/23 TVsCT (median: DC = 0.7, HD = 34 mm). For the sufficient category, remaining inaccuracies could be compensated by +1 to +4 mm additional margin to achieve coverage of V95% > 95% and V95% > 98%, respectively in 12/13 TVsCT. ConclusionThe evaluated sCT quality allowed for accurate delineation for most targets. sCTs with insufficient quality could be identified accurately upfront. A moderate PTV margin expansion could address remaining delineation inaccuracies. Therefore, these findings support further exploration of CBCT based one-table treatments on C-arm linacs.

Periprosthetic metastases in carcinoma of unknown primary: A rare association.

Septic or aseptic loosening may cause bone loss around artificial prosthesis leading to prosthesis failure. This occurrence due to metastatic infiltration of bone or surrounding soft tissues is rare but has been occasionally reported. We report a case of an elderly lady presenting with swelling and pain at the site of previous hemiarthroplasty performed for traumatic injury. On evaluation, she was found to have a lytic femur lesion with a large soft-tissue component around the prosthetic joint. Biopsy suggested a metastatic carcinoma of renal origin, but screening of kidneys did not reveal any primary lesion. She had additional skeletal metastatic lesions but no other primary site was detected either. She was given palliative radiotherapy and systemic therapy (sunitinib) based on the histologic diagnosis of renal cell origin but did not tolerate it. Thereafter, she is continuing on zoledronate every 4 weeks and best supportive management since 4 months from diagnosis.

Radiotherapy in metastatic bladder cancer

PurposeTo review available and emerging evidence of radiotherapy for symptom management and disease control in metastatic bladder cancer.MethodsA literature search and subsequent cross-referencing were carried out for articles in the PubMed and Scopus databases using terms ‘radiotherapy’ OR ‘palliative radiation therapy’ with ‘metastatic bladder cancer’ OR ‘advanced bladder cancer’ between 1990 and 2023, excluding articles with no English translation.ResultsPalliative radiotherapy is an effective and accessible treatment for the alleviation of haematuria and pain due to the primary and metastatic disease. With growing recognition of oligometastatic disease state at diagnosis, response, or progression, radiotherapy can consolidate response by ablating residual or resistant lesions. Experience with other primary cancers supports positive impact of radiotherapy on disease control, quality of life, and survival in oligometastatic stage, without significant adverse effects. Alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors, fibroblast growth receptor inhibitors, and antibody–drug conjugates, the immunomodulatory potential of radiotherapy is being explored in combination with these systemic therapies for metastatic bladder cancer.ConclusionRadiotherapy is an effective, safe, and accessible treatment modality for palliation as well as disease control in various clinical settings of metastatic bladder cancer. Its role in oligometastatic stage in combination with systemic therapy is expected to expand with emerging evidence.

Prognostic impact of local recurrence and timing of palliative radiotherapy in patients with unresectable recurrent rectal cancer.

132 Background: The standard treatment for unresectable recurrent rectal cancer (URRC) is chemotherapy (CTx) regardless of local recurrence (LR). Approximately 80% of patients with LR experience LR-related pain, making these patients difficult to treat, especially the timing of radiotherapy (RT). However, the impact of LR and the appropriate timing of palliative RT on prognosis in patients with URRC remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with URRC who had an ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0–2 and received fluoropyrimidines plus oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan as first-line CTx between September 2006 and December 2020 at a single institution. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with LR (LR+) and patients without LR (LR−). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and post-progression survival (PPS) after first-line CTx were compared between the two groups. The association between receiving palliative RT for LR-related symptoms until disease progression after first-line CTx and the proportion of patients receiving subsequent second-line CTx was also evaluated in the LR+ group. Multivariate Cox analysis, including variables with p &lt; 0.10 in univariate analyses, was performed for PPS. Results: The LR+ and LR− groups included 49 and 99 patients, respectively. No significant differences in the baseline characteristics were detected between the two groups, except liver metastasis, which occurred less frequently in the LR+ group. OS and PPS were shorter in the LR+ group compared with the LR- group (median OS, 33.4 vs. 48.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; p = 0.05; median PPS, 17.2 vs. 23.5 months; HR, 1.77; p = 0.01). PFS was similar between the two groups (median PFS, 13.0 vs. 15.8 months; HR, 1.18; p = 0.39). Fewer patients in the LR+ group received second-line CTx compared with the LR- group (68 vs. 83%, p = 0.06). The proportions of patients with PS ≥ 1 (78 vs. 52%, p = 0.007) and PS deterioration at progression after first-line CTx (59 vs. 27 %, p = 0.002) were higher in the LR+ group compared with the LR group-. The most common cause of PS deterioration in the LR+ group was LR-related pain (77%). Among patients with LR-related pain, the proportion of patients receiving subsequent second-line CTx was numerically lower in patients who did not receive palliative RT than in patients who did receive palliative RT until disease progression after first-line CTx (75 vs. 54%, p = 0.23). Multivariate analysis revealed that receiving subsequent second-line CTx was an independent prognostic factor for PPS in LR+ patients (adjusted HR, 4.77; p = 0.006). Conclusions: The presence of LR is associated with poor prognosis in URRC, which may be due to worsening PS caused by LR-related symptoms and the lower proportion of subsequent CTx. Thus, palliative RT should be recommended more actively when LR becomes symptomatic.

Prophylactic Radiotherapy Of MInimally Symptomatic Spinal Disease (PROMISSeD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundEarly palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year.MethodsThis is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0–2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20–30 Gy of radiation in 2–10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05.DiscussionThe results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321. Registered September 9, 2022.Trial statusVersion 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.