Palliative Care Consultation Research Articles

Measuring palliative care integration in Malawi through service provision, access, and training indicators: the Waterloo Coalition Initiative

BackgroundFewer than 1 in 20 people on the African continent in need of palliative care receive it. Malawi is a low-income country in sub-Saharan Africa that has yet to achieve advanced palliative care integration accompanied by unrestricted access to pain and symptom relieving palliative medicines. This paper studied the impact of Malawi’s Waterloo Coalition Initiative (WCI) – a local project promoting palliative care integration through service development, staff training, and increased service access.MethodsInterdisciplinary health professionals at 13 hospitals in southern Malawi were provided robust palliative care training over a 10-month period. We used a cross-sectional evaluation to measure palliative care integration based on 11 consensus-based indicators over a one-year period.Results92% of hospitals made significant progress in all 11 indicators. Specifically, there was a 69% increase in the number of dedicated palliative care rooms/clinics, a total of 253 staff trained across all hospitals (a 220% increase in the region), substantive increases in the number of patients receiving or assessed for palliative care, and the number of hospitals that maintained access to morphine or other opioid analgesics while increasing the proportion of referrals to hospice or other palliative care programs.ConclusionPalliative care is a component of universal health coverage and Sustainable Development Goal 3. The WCI has made tremendous strides in establishing and integrating palliative care services in Malawi with notable progress across 11 project indicators, demonstrating that increased palliative care access is possible in severely resource-constrained settings through sustained models of partnership at the local level.

Piloting a Patient Tool to Aid Palliative Care Referrals during Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment

ContextPatient misperceptions are a strong barrier to early palliative care discussions and referrals during advanced lung cancer treatment. ObjectivesWe developed and tested the acceptability of a web-based patient-facing palliative care education and screening tool intended for use in a planned multilevel intervention (i.e., patient, clinician, system-level targets). MethodsWe elicited feedback from advanced lung cancer patients (n = 6), oncology and palliative care clinicians (n = 4), and a clinic administrator (n = 1) on the perceived relevance of the intervention. We then tested the prototype of a patient-facing tool for patient acceptability and preliminary effects on patient palliative care knowledge and motivation. ResultsPartners agreed that the intervention—clinician palliative care education and an electronic health record-integrated patient tool—is relevant and their feedback informed development of the patient prototype. Advanced stage lung cancer patients (n = 20; age 60 ± 9.8; 40% male; 70% with a technical degree or less) reviewed and rated the prototype on a five-point scale for acceptability (4.48 ± 0.55), appropriateness (4.37 ± 0.62), and feasibility (4.43 ± 0.59). After using the prototype, 75% were interested in using palliative care and 80% were more motivated to talk to their oncologist about it. Of patients who had or were at risk of having misperceptions about palliative care (e.g., conflating it with hospice), 100% no longer held the misperceptions after using the prototype. ConclusionThe palliative care education and screening tool is acceptable to patients and may address misperceptions and motivate palliative care discussions during treatment.

Exploration of Patient and Clinician Experience of Video Consultations in Community Palliative Care

ContextTelehealth video consultations (VCs) were implemented in the community palliative care team (CPCT) in a regional NSW health district, Australia, as a response to restrictions to the COVID-19 pandemic, using patient's device in the absence of a clinician. ObjectivesTo evaluate patient/carer and clinician satisfaction in using VCs for CPC consultations; to explore advantages and challenges of VCs. MethodsSelf-reported online questionnaires to community-dwelling patients under care of the CPCT; seeking patients/carers and clinician perspectives on the VCs from April to September 2020. ResultsOf 126 eSurveys completed, (85 clinicians; 41 patients/carers), 97% patient/carers and 97% clinicians indicated they were satisfied with VC. Overall, 93% clinicians agreed they provided same level of care compared to face-to-face review; 85% patients/carers agreed they received same level of care compared to face-to-face consultations and 98% agreed their issues were addressed. Of eSurvey responses 97% clinicians and 78% patients/carers indicated they would continue to use VCs in practice. Comments indicated dissatisfaction with lack of personal examination; some found technological issues to be barriers. Benefits discovered incidentally were empowering patient independence to live out their end-of-life desires while being treated/supported, improved service delivery, increased staff autonomy and upskilling staff. ConclusionUsers in this study perceived VCs to have a place in CPC consultations. Using patient device enabled patient freedom, improved timeliness of clinical assessment, and communication to complement face-to-face consults, while minimizing infection risk. Unexpected, but valuable benefits were revealed. Workable technology is paramount.

Caring for Patients Requiring Venous Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Can Upstream Palliative Care Make a Difference?

Palliative care consultation is relevant for patients requiring Venous-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO); however, evidence is limited to support its value. For this population, we compared length of stay (LOS) (primary outcome), operational metrics and goals of care (GOC) frequency before and after a collaboration between cardiothoracic (CT) surgery and Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine (GaP). Retrospective chart review of patients (18+) admitted to a quaternary center that required VA-ECMO between 2019-2021 and received GaP consultation. Demographics, LOS, times to consult, illness severity, GOC, and outcomes were analyzed. 120 patients met inclusion criteria and 64 (53.3%) had GaP consultation. No differences were observed regarding demographics and insertion status (emergent vs elective). Median (IQR) days to GaP consult for 2019, 2020 and 2021 were 6.5 (4.0-14.5), 5.0 (2.0-11.0) and 3.0 (2.0-5.0), respectively (P = .006). Median days from insertion to consult for 2019, 2020 and 2021 were 6.0 (4.0-20.0), 3.0 (1.0-6.0) and 2.0 (1.0-4.0) (P = .003). Among survivors, over the 3-year course, median LOS was not statistically different. Between expired patients, median (IQR) LOS for 2019, 2020, and 2021 was 28.5 (23.0-40.0), 12.0 (8.0-14.0), 11.0 (5.0-17.0) days (P = .013). For patients not seen by GaP, 8 (14.3%) GOC notes were documented, compared with 42 (65.6%) for patients seen. Mortality was similar (53.6% vs 53.1% [GaP]). For patient on VA-ECMO, early GaP consultation may improve hospital LOS and GOC rates. We suggest organizations consider early palliative integration when instituting mechanical circulatory support.

“We're Onto Something Here!”: Clinician Perspectives of a Pilot Program to Increase Palliative Care Access in an Urban Skilled Nursing Facility

Many adults cycle between the hospital and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) near the end of life. However, palliative care services, which can provide specialized support for patients with serious illness, are often limited at SNFs. The “3C's Palliative Care Program,” a 5-month pilot, aimed to improve palliative care access for patients admitted to subacute rehabilitation at an SNF affiliated with an urban academic medical center. This manuscript focuses on the pilot's feasibility, acceptability based on SNF clinician feedback from interviews, and lessons learned. The 3C's Program featured primary palliative care skill coaching, virtual palliative care consultations, and continuity via referrals to home-based palliative care at discharge. Ninety percent of SNF clinicians surveyed recommended the continuation of the pilot. SNF clinicians felt the program improved their ability to identify patients for PC consultation, to understand the role and value of palliative care, and to appreciate their patients' illness trajectories. Lessons learned from this pilot suggest SNF–Palliative Care clinician relationship building and simple patient identification mechanisms for palliative care are key to the success of palliative care at SNF integration.

Palliative Care Consultation And Outcomes Of Heart Failure Hospitalizations With Covid Infection During The 2020 Pandemic. Insight From The 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

Palliative Care Consultation And Outcomes Of Heart Failure Hospitalizations With Covid Infection During The 2020 Pandemic. Insight From The 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

End of life care in chronic limb threatening ischemia: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveChronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the end-stage of peripheral artery disease, defined as 2 or more weeks of rest pain and/or tissue loss from objectively proven obstructive arterial disease. Mortality is high, yet literature on end-of-life and palliative care in this setting is scarce. Palliative care is care that is aimed at alleviating the physiological and psychological symptoms and addresses the social and spiritual needs of patients and family/carers. End-of-life care is an umbrella term for palliative care given alongside disease-modifying care. The aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of end-of-life and palliative care and corresponding outcomes using surgical revascularization and amputation as surrogate markers for CLTI. MethodsThis was a retrospective single-center cohort study of people with CLTI who underwent either surgical revascularization (bypass) or amputation between January 2018 and December 2019. Palliative care input was defined as a dedicated palliative care consultation by a palliative care professional, medical doctor, surgeon, or advanced care practitioner. Data was collected on patient demographics, cause and place of death, and palliative and end-of-life care outcomes, which included documentation of preferred place of care/death and care priorities, family involvement in advance care planning discussions, key workers allocated to coordinate palliative care, use of community palliative care registers, hospice referral, time spent in hospital and the intensive care unit toward the end of life, and realization of documented care objectives. The data was analyzed to determine predictors of palliative care and tangible outcomes. ResultsOne-hundred and eighty-six patients were included (116 bypass and 70 amputation) with a median age of 67.5 years (interquartile range, 58-76 years) and most were male (73.7%) with a median survival of 46 months (interquartile range, 21-54 months) and a 2-year survival of 72% (95% confidence interval, 66%-79%). Palliative care consultations occurred for 10.8% of patients, with the median time from consultation to death of 5 days. Of the deceased, only a few had preferred place of care/death (8.1%), care priorities (18.3%), and family involvement during advance care planning (15.1%) documented in their notes. Cause of death was most commonly due to sepsis (n = 30), malignancy (n = 11), and myocardial infarction (n = 10). Mortality and in-hospital death were significantly higher in patients who underwent amputation in comparison to bypass surgery. There was an association of both cardiac and renal dysfunction with palliative care input. Patients with palliative care input were more likely to have documentation of preferred place of care/death, care priorities, and resuscitation decisions; and family involvement in advance care planning decisions. However, this did not translate into a reduction in hospital readmission or time spent in the hospital or intensive care unit towards the end of life. ConclusionsPatients with CLTI are not being offered palliative care in line with The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence or The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland guidance. There was an association between palliative care input and end-of-life care quality. However, input occurred too close to death to have a very significant effect. Further research, development of clinical pathways and services, and better integration between palliative and vascular services is needed to improve the end-of-life care of patients living with CLTI.

Navigating late-stage dementia: A perspective from the Alzheimer's Association.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, a general term for memory loss and decline in other cognitive abilities enough to interfere with daily life. AD accounts for 60% to 80% of dementia cases. The late stage of AD tends to be the shortest stage and, on average, lasts 1 to 2 years. As this stage of the condition progresses, it requires continuous intensive long-term care and around-the-clock intensive care. The Alzheimer's Association stands firm in its commitment to supporting individuals living with AD and other dementia, their care partners, and their health-care providers as they navigate treatment and care decisions across the continuum of the disease. This article is a direct response to recently published works that run counter to the Association's viewpoint. It outlines the Association's perspective on crucial factors for consideration during late-stage dementia care, including advanced directives, palliative care, nutrition, and legal considerations. It explores diverse perspectives from the field, differing from the Alzheimer's Association's stance. Last, it underscores resources available through the Alzheimer's Association, aiming to present a comprehensive perspective on late-stage care for support and assistance to all involved.

COVID-19 and End of Life in a Quaternary Australian Hospital: Referral for Palliative Care Consultation.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in complex physical and psychosocial symptom burden at end of life. The benefit of specialist palliative care input in other disease states has been established, however, there is little evidence on referral patterns to these services in patients dying from COVID-19. This retrospective audit investigated the referral patterns for patients who died from COVID-19 at a quaternary hospital in South Australia (the Royal Adelaide Hospital) over a six-month period in 2022, and whether demographic features or COVID-19 specific factors had an impact on whether these patients received specialist palliative care services (PCS). The second aim was to identify prescription patterns for patients in the last 24 hours of life, and whether this was impacted by referral. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and analyzed using binary logistic regressions for referral to PCS versus no referral based on various predictors. There was no significant difference comparing patient demographics or COVID-19 specific factors with referral to PCS. There was statistical significance between patients who received referral to PCS and those who had a higher oral morphine equivalent daily dose (OMEDD) in the 24 hours before death, as well as the presence of a continuous subcutaneous infusion. Although the cause of this relationship is undetermined, it may represent the prescription patterns of the palliative care physicians during consultation or potentially higher symptom burden prompting referral. There was also a higher proportion of patients who received hydromorphone compared with other opioids, though the OMEDD was consistent with other published literature.

Cardiogenic Shock Patients With High Readmission Risk Are More Likely To Undergo Palliative Care Consultation

Cardiogenic Shock Patients With High Readmission Risk Are More Likely To Undergo Palliative Care Consultation

Patient Outcomes of a Virtual Reality-Based Music Therapy Pilot in Palliative Care.

Hospitalized patients with palliative care needs often have high levels of physical and psychological symptom distress. Virtual reality (VR) with a music therapy intervention may improve physical and psychological symptoms. To assess symptom distress and quality of life (QOL) among hospitalized palliative care patients who participated in a virtual reality-based music therapy (VR-MT) intervention, and to explore VR-MT from the perspectives of health care professionals involved in their care. Single-arm pilot study of a two-day VR-MT intervention. Patients seen by an inpatient palliative care consultation service at a U.S. hospital could participate in the VR-MT intervention. Participants created a customized soundtrack with a music therapist and then listened to it while experiencing a 360-degree VR nature-based environment of their choice. Patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, revised version (ESAS-r) and McGill Quality of Life, revised version (MQOL-R) before and after VR-MT. Members of the participants' health care teams were interviewed. Seventeen patients completed VR-MT (range 20-79 years of age, 59% women). Moderate clinical improvements were observed for total ESAS-r score (Cohen's d effect size, 0.68), physical distress subscale (0.52), and psychological distress subscale (0.60); small improvements were observed in total MQOL-r score (0.26) and the existential subscale (0.27). Health care team members described the value of VR-MT as facilitating meaningful conversations. This pilot study of VR combined with a music therapy intervention for hospitalized patients with palliative care needs supports opportunities for future study of potential improvements in symptom distress and QOL.

A case study of palliative care consultation: narrative practice for addressing clinical bottleneck problems

A case study of palliative care consultation: narrative practice for addressing clinical bottleneck problems

Exploring patient perspectives on electronic patient-reported outcome measures in home-based cancer palliative care: A qualitative study.

Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROMs) enhance symptom management and patients' engagement in palliative cancer care. However, integrating them into this setting brings challenges, including patients' familiarity with technological devices and declining health status. Prioritizing the patient's acceptability and feasibility is crucial for their adoption. However, more knowledge is needed about patients' perspectives on the adoption of ePROMs in the community, especially for home-based palliative care. Explore patient viewpoints on utilizing ePROMs for symptom reporting in home-based oncology palliative care. A qualitative interpretative approach was used to evaluate patients' points of view on using ePROMs in this specific care setting. Semistructured interviews were carried out. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis. A total of 25 patients receiving oncological home palliative care from the advanced palliative care unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy, were invited to participate. Twenty interviews were conducted, as five patients declined due to deteriorating health. Four themes were identified: (1) strategic value of ePROMs and subjective appreciation; (2) enhancing patient centeredness through ePROMs; (3) exploring and addressing concerns about the use of ePROMs and (4) intersecting factors influencing the efficacy of ePROMs. Despite initial reticence, home palliative care patients consider ePROMs as potentially valuable allies monitoring symptoms, enhancing their quality of life, and amplifying their voices on less explored aspects of care. Continuous dialog between healthcare professionals and patients is crucial for addressing patient skepticism about ePROMs and their impact on the human aspect of care.

Effects of tertiary palliative care on the pattern of end-of-life care in patients with hematologic malignancies in Korea.

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) often face challenges in accessing palliative care (PC) and receiving quality end-of-life (EOL) care. We examined factors associated with referrals to tertiary PC and the effects of tertiary PC on EOL care in patients with HMs. We included patients with HMs who were admitted to a university-affiliated hospital and died during hospitalization between January 2018 and December 2021. We investigated the receipt of PC consultations, patient characteristics, and EOL care indicators. Overall, 487 patients were included in the analysis, with 156 (32%) undergoing PC consultation. Sex, residence, disease status, and admission purpose were factors associated with the likelihood of PC consultation, and there has been an increasing trend in the frequency of consultations in recent cases. A higher proportion of patients who received PC completed advance statements and life-sustaining treatment documents. Patients who received PC had lower rates of aggressive EOL care, including chemotherapy and intensive care unit admission, than those who did not receive PC. Notably, PC reduced the number of blood transfusions. Tertiary PC aims to reduce aggressive EOL care through patient-centered goal-of-care discussions. Therefore, there is an imperative need for concerted efforts toward seamless integration of PC.

Development and validation of multivariable predictive models for recurrence and mortality following nonoperative management of sigmoid volvulus.

Sigmoid volvulus is a challenging condition, and deciding between elective surgery or expectant management can be complex. The aim of this study was to develop a tool for predicting the risk of recurrent sigmoid volvulus and all-cause mortality within 1 year following initial nonoperative management. This is a retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims data from 2016 to 2018 of beneficiaries admitted urgently/emergently for volvulus, undergoing colonic decompression and discharged alive without surgery (excluding those discharged to hospice). The primary outcomes were recurrent sigmoid volvulus and all-cause mortality within 1 year. Proportional hazards models and logistic regression were employed to identify risk factors and develop prediction equations, which were subsequently validated. Among the 2078 patients managed nonoperatively, 36.1% experienced recurrent sigmoid volvulus and 28.6% died within 1 year. The prediction model for recurrence integrated age, sex, race, palliative care consultations and four comorbidities, achieving area under the curve values of 0.63 in both the training and testing samples. The model for mortality incorporated age, palliative care consultations and nine comorbidities, with area under the curve values of 0.76 in the training and 0.70 in the testing sample. This study provides a straightforward predictive tool that utilizes easily accessible data to estimate individualized risks of recurrent sigmoid volvulus and all-cause mortality for older adults initially managed nonoperatively. The tool can assist clinicians and patients in making informed decisions about such risks. While the accuracy of the calculator was validated, further confirmation through external validation and prospective studies would enhance its clinical utility.

The impact of a multidisciplinary goals-of-care program on unplanned readmission rates at a comprehensive cancer center.

This study examined the 30-day unplanned readmission rate in the medical oncology population before and after the implementation of an institution-wide multicomponent interdisciplinary goals of care (myGOC) program. This retrospective study compared the 30-day unplanned readmission rates in consecutive medical patients during the pre-implementation period (May 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019) and the post-implementation period (May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020). Secondary outcomes included 7-day unplanned readmission rates, inpatient do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, and palliative care consults. We randomly selected a hospitalization encounter for each unique patient during each study period for statistical analysis. A multivariate analysis model was used to examine the association between 30-day unplanned readmission rates and implementation of the myGOC program. There were 7028 and 5982 unique medical patients during the pre- and post-implementation period, respectively. The overall 30-day unplanned readmission rate decreased from 24.0 to 21.3% after implementation of the myGOC program. After adjusting for covariates, the myGOC program implementation remained significantly associated with a reduction in 30-day unplanned readmission rates (OR [95% CI] 0.85 [0.77, 0.95], p = 0.003). Other factors significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of a 30-day unplanned readmission were an inpatient DNR order, advanced care planning documentation, and an emergent admission type. We also observed a significant decrease in 7-day unplanned readmission rates (OR [95% CI] 0.75 [0.64, 0.89]) after implementation of the myGOC program. The 30-day and 7-day unplanned readmission rates decreased in our hospital after implementation of a system-wide multicomponent GOC intervention.

Palliative Care Consultation and Family-Centered Outcomes in Patients With Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Admissions.

Context: Hospitalized patients who experience unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions face significant challenges, and their family members have unique palliative care needs. Objectives: To identify predictors of palliative care consultation among hospitalized patients with unplanned ICU admissions and to examine the association between palliative care consultation and family outcomes. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with unplanned ICU admissions at two medical centers in Seattle, WA. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Washington (STUDY00008182). Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined associations between patient characteristics and palliative care consultation. Family members completed surveys assessing psychological distress within 90 days of patient discharge. Adjusted ordinal probit or binary logistic regression models were used to identify associations between palliative care consultation and family symptoms of psychological distress. Results: In our cohort (n = 413 patients and 272 family members), palliative care was consulted for 24% of patients during hospitalization (n = 100), with the majority (93%) of these consultations occurring after ICU admission. Factors associated with palliative care consultation after ICU transfer included enrollment site (OR, 2.29; 95% CI: 1.17-4.50), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at ICU admission (OR, 1.12; 95% CI: 1.05-1.19), and reason for hospital admission (kidney dysfunction [OR, 7.02; 95% CI: 1.08-45.69]). There was no significant difference in family symptoms of depression or posttraumatic stress based on palliative care consultation status. Conclusions: For patients experiencing unplanned ICU admission, palliative care consultation often happened after transfer and was associated with illness severity, comorbid illness, and hospital site. Patient death was associated with family symptoms of psychological distress.

Screening for Palliative Care Need in Oncology: Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

ContextLeading oncology societies recommend monitoring symptoms and support needs through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), but their use for assessing specialist palliative care (SPC) need has not yet been explored. Research on SPC integration has focused on staff-assessed screening tools, which are time-consuming. ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic validity of the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) and NCCN Distress Thermometer (NCCN DT) in identifying need for SPC in patients with incurable cancer. MethodsIn a cross-sectional study, patients with incurable cancer (prognosis <2 years) completed PROMs. In an independent process, the palliative care consultation service (PCCS) assessed the need for SPC in each patient through multiprofessional case review, and this was used as the reference standard. ROC analyses were employed to determine diagnostic validity. ResultsOf the 208 participants, 71 (34.1 %) were classified as having SPC need by the PCCS. Aiming for a minimum sensitivity of 80%, a cut-off of ≥2 items with high/very high burden in the IPOS resulted in a 90.2% sensitivity (specificity = 50; AUC = 0.791; CI 95%= 0.724–0.858). A cut-off of ≥5 resulted in a sensitivity of 80 % for NCCN DT (specificity = 49.5 %; AUC = 0.687; CI 95% = 0.596–0.777). ConclusionPROMs are useful for identifying SPC need in cancer patients. Their implementation might facilitate timely integration of SPC. Future research should focus on an integrated assessment approach with PROMs that combines the requirements of the different specialties to save patient and staff resources.

Trends in utilisation of palliative care services in COVID-19 patients and their impact on hospital resources in the USA: insights from the national inpatient sample

ObjectivesPoor prognosis and lack of effective therapeutic options have made palliative care an integral part of the management of severe COVID-19. However, clinical studies on the role of palliative care...

DO RELIGION, CULTURE, RACE, OR ETHNICITY PLAY A ROLE IN CHOOSING PEG TUBE AT THE END OF LIFE?

Abstract Although there is substantial evidence that Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) causes significant morbidity and does not change mortality for patients with advanced dementia it continues to be used. We describe a quality initiative of Palliative Care Consultation (PCC) in conjunction with any new PEG evaluation. EMR review and interview with patient (and/or proxy) being evaluated for first-time PEG in two community hospitals within large health system in demographically diverse major metropolitan area. PCC teams provided consistent, culturally/religiously, language-sensitive education regarding PEG, conducted interviews about subsequent decision. Post-initiative PEG placement dropped from &amp;gt;75% to 17.6%, 76 patients received PCC with PEG evaluation. Average age 83.5 (range: 56-108), 55% female. Religion: 54% Christian, 7% Muslim, 10% Jewish, 11% non-religious, 18% other; 46% White, 37% Black, 8% Asian, 8% Hispanic. Common evaluation reasons: difficulty swallowing (30%), low PO intake (30%). Majority of patients had dementia (71%), stroke (18%), Parkinson’s (8%). Most decision-makers (66%) hadn’t received prior counseling regarding alternate nutrition options. After PCC, 17.6% chose PEG, 79.7% careful hand feeding, 2.7% remained unsure. Those choosing PEG mostly desired “guaranteed” nutrition despite risks (10/13), and/or a trial seeking patient recovery (5/13). There were no apparent differences in race/ethnicity, age, sex, or religion that distinguished those electing PEG. PCC initiative to support patients and families “choosing wisely” around PEG placement for those with advanced illness has resulted in significant reduction. Decision-makers mostly cited wish to guarantee nutrition while some hoped for patient recovery. Religious affiliation and sex were not cited as reasons in this group.