It is a curious feature of Dowland's Second Booke of Songs (1600oo) that 'Flow my teares', his texting of the Lachrimae Pavan, is placed second. One might expect that a work already admired, emulated and bowdlerized would more naturally have headed the collection whose melancholy tone it so perfectly encapsulates.1 Wonderful as the preceding song, 'I saw my Lady weepe', may be, is it so special as to deserve pride of place? And why is this song, and not 'Flow my teares', dedicated 'To the most famous, Anthony Holborne', given that it was the Lachrimae Pavan that Holborne had emulated in his own Pavana Ploravit, published the previous year? What has 'I saw my Lady weepe' to do with 'Flow my teares'? An answer bringing with it several more questions lies, barely concealed, in the music. 'I saw my Lady weepe', uniquely among the songs of the Second Booke, ends a 5th away from its tonal focus (on E, in relation to the focal A).' Although at first glance this relationship might seem easily explicable in traditional modal terms, the harmonic language of the song cannot sensibly be read as mode 4 (a-a', but with the final on e). The concluding E-chord needs resolution through a return to A, not just because of Dowland's use of sharpward chord changes (at 'in those faire eies' and 'hir face was full of woe') which destabilize the A-focus of the song, but crucially because the cantus line ends on g' sharp, which is modally indefensible as a full close. Whether read modally or tonally, the piece is incomplete. Both in theory and in terms of the listener's experience of the song, 'I saw my Lady weepe' not only ends 'in the wrong place' relative to the final (or tonic), but that final has itself been disrupted: a need remains for its confirmation and firm re-establishment if the song is not to seem to some degree incomplete. When the first two songs are performed in sequence, 'Flow my teares' provides the essential resolution. The need for such resolution is intensified by Dowland's making similar play with metrical instability. The last phrase of 'I saw my Lady weepe' ('then mirth can doe, with hir intysing parts') disrupts the listener's grasp of both large and small scale rhythm by introducing syncopation across the semibreve beat, followed by two 'extra' notes requiring text repetition, all of which can be heard in relation to the underlying beat in conflicting ways. The whole phrase totals seven semibreve beats, following two regular phrases of six each. For both reasons further music is required in order to settle the metre; and 'Flow my teares' duly provides a comforting series of fo r-beat phrases to restore the listener's equilibrium. Similarly, the melodic ascent which closes 'I saw my Lady weepe', e' f g' a', pausing on the neighbour-note g' sharp as a pivot between the two songs, is answered at the start of 'Flow my teares' by the complementary descent a' g' f e', which is itself both anticipated in augmentation in the bass at the end of 'I saw my Lady weepe' (a relationship evident in the unusual duet form in which the first eight songs are published) and echoed immediately at the beginning of 'Flow my teares' in the lowest line of the lute (ex.1). The model for this symmetrical join was perhaps that between the second and third sections of 'Flow my teares'. There the melodic material is c b' a' g' sharp (pause) g' sharp a' b' c, the constituents of the second limb ('fall from your springs') of the opening phrase (ex.2). It is these two melodic gestures (designated 'a' and 'b' in the musical examples) that provide much of the material of both songs.