AbstractAnimal populations can present different mating tactics according to the number of mates males or females obtain. The limiting factors for copulation in symbiont crustaceans are the size, structural complexity, and density of refuge, in addition to predation risk outside their shelters. In this study, we aimed to investigate, comparatively, if the occupation of the same refuge leads to the same reproductive tactic in two symbiont species of alpheid shrimps. For this purpose, we described the population distribution of Alpheus estuariensis, a burrowing shrimp, and Salmoneus carvachoi, a tenant species, in an intertidal mudflat in Pernambuco, northeastern Brazil. Alpheus estuariensis experiences sexual dimorphism relative to body and cheliped size, where males present larger body sizes and allocate more resources to cheliped growth than females. However, both males and females presented positive allometric growth in chelipeds. In S. carvachoi, male‐phase individuals reach smaller body sizes than hermaphrodites. Male‐phase shrimps experience positive allometry in cheliped size, while hermaphrodites do not. Both species were found inhabiting burrows as sexual pairs more frequently than expected by chance. Paired females of A. estuariensis were found carrying embryos more frequently than solitary ones. We did not find a statistical difference between the frequency of single and paired ovigerous hermaphrodites in S. carvachoi. Our results indicate that A. estuariensis is social monogamous, while S. carvachoi is promiscuous. We argue that different biological and ecological aspects of these species could explain the distinct tactics adopted by them. Alpheus estuariensis digs its own refuge and is a much larger species, bearing a more robust cheliped than S. carvachoi. Thus, we argue that the burrowing species (A. estuariensis) should monopolize and defend their refuge, and S. carvachoi only takes advantage of this resource.