Background: Infant pain liability has been assessed in several studies; nonetheless, diminutive is recognized about the relevance and effectiveness of using one type of pain scale affording to the type of painful stimulus and the infant’s age. Purpose: Our purpose was to conduct a metaanalysis to assess and report on the efficiency of using the procedural pain scale to measure pain in a child aged 0-1 year using non-pharmacological interventions. Methods: A systematic search was performed up to October 2021 in PubMed and Cochrane Library. The current review enrolled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) according to PRISMA guidelines. Cochrane's risk of bias assessment was performed to assess the studies' quality and risk of bias. Meta-analyses were completed by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) at a 95% confidence interval (CI) using Review Manager Software. The review variables are: neonatal, pain, RCT and assessment. Results: The literature search returned 50 trials, but only 8 were involved in this meta-analysis. In most studies related to procedural pain (heel lance and vaccination), three commonly validated pain scales were used in all trials (neonatal infant pain scale NIPS, premature infant pain profile PIPP and neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale NPASS. The 8 studies with 918 infant participants entered into analysis using effective pain scales (NIPS, PIPP and NPASS) to measure procedural pain effectively. Most studies used effective pain scales to measure procedural pain (NIPS, PIPP and NPASS). The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in pain using NIPS, PIPP and NPASS tools. The most used was NIPS at 62.5%, followed by PIPP (25%) and NPASS (12.5%). The various interventions in studies reflected the strength of the used pain scale when assessing pain severity and supported the effect of non-pharmacological interventions (swaddling, mother holding and sucrose) in pain reduction compared with the control group (SMD 1.2, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.52, P =0.0005), I` = 95%, P>0.00001. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, it has been reported that the pain scales used were an appropriate measure of the outcome of pain reduction. The type and accuracy of the validation of pain scales are also essential when selecting tools for a clinical trial. Implications for Nursing: The pain scales used in studies are appropriate to assess pain when measuring procedural pain (heel lance and needle-related procedures such as vaccination). Pediatric nurses should take care of selecting appropriate tools to assess pain in children before managing the pain. Further, pediatric nurses should be aware of that the inconsistency about the best tool for children is related to several factors. One is related to matching the pain tool to the age group and type of pain
Read full abstract