Hip Osteoarthritis Pain Research Articles

Low prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis and its discordance with hip pain: A nationwide study in Korea.

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) in the Korean community-dwelling population. This study included 11 814 individuals (5025 men and 6789 women) ≥50 years of age from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Radiographic hip OA was defined as having a Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale score ≥2. Painful hip OA was defined as radiographic hip OA with the presence of hip pain. The prevalence of radiographic hip OA was evaluated with respect to age group, sex and presence of hip pain. The associations of sociodemographic and clinical variables with hip OA and hip pain were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. The weighted prevalence of radiographic hip OA and painful hip OA was 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively, in Korea. Older age (≥75 years) and male sex were independently associated with radiographic hip OA and painless hip OA. Comorbid musculoskeletal pain (knee pain) was independently associated with painful hip OA. The difference between painful and painless hip OA was the presence of comorbid musculoskeletal pain (knee pain and low back pain). Although hip pain was more common in women than in men, it was associated with the severity of hip OA only in men. Radiographic hip OA is rare in Korean middle-aged and elderly people. Furthermore, hip pain is infrequent in radiographic hip OA. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 20-26.

Patients use fewer analgesics following supervised exercise therapy and patient education: an observational study of 16 499 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis

ObjectivesTo investigate changes in analgesic use before and after supervised exercise therapy and patient education in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsWe recruited 16 499 of 25 933 eligible...

Risk factors for pain and functional impairment in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo identify risk factors for pain and functional deterioration in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) to form the basis of a future ‘stratification tool’ for OA development or...

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Osteoarthritic Hip Pain: a Comprehensive Review.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent cause of chronic hip pain, affecting 27% of adults aged over 45years and 42% of adults aged over 75years. Though OA has traditionally been described as a disorder of "wear-and-tear," recent studies have expanded on this understanding to include a possible inflammatory etiology as well, damage to articular cartilage produces debris in the joint that is phagocytosed by synovial cells which leads to inflammation. Patients with OA of the hip frequently have decreased quality of life due to pain and limited mobility though additional comorbidities of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, poor sleep quality, and obesity have been correlated. Initial treatment with conservative medical management can provide effective symptomatic relief. Physical therapy and exercise are important components of a multimodal approach to osteoarthritic hip pain. Patients with persistent pain may benefit from minimally invasive therapeutic approaches prior to consideration of undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The objective of this review is to provide an update of current minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of pain stemming from hip osteoarthritis; these include intra-articular injection of medication, regenerative therapies, and radiofrequency ablation.

O04 Clinical and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intra-articular corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection for hip OA: a randomised controlled trial (HIT)

Abstract Background Evidence of the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injection for hip osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. The HIT trial compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip injection (USGI) of 40mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4ml 1% lidocaine hydrochloride combined with best current treatment (BCT) with (i) BCT alone (primary objective) and (ii) an USGI of 5ml 1% lidocaine only combined with BCT (EudraCT:2014-003412-37). Methods This was a pragmatic, three-parallel arm, single-blind, randomised controlled trial in adults with moderate-severe painful hip OA recruited from community musculoskeletal services and primary care. Participants were randomised equally to: (1) BCT alone, (2) BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine, or (3) BCT plus USGI lidocaine only. Outcomes were collected postally at 2 weeks, 2, 4 and 6 months. The primary outcome was self-reported current hip pain intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)) over 6 months (repeated measures analysis). Secondary outcomes included function (WOMAC), and, for cost-utility analysis, general health (EQ-5D-5L) and healthcare utilisation. 204 participants were required to detect a minimum difference of 1 point in mean pain NRS score between arms (1) and (2) with 80% power (5% two-tailed significance level, 15% loss to follow-up). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results 199 participants were recruited (43% male, mean age 63 years), 67 to arm (1) and 66 each to arms (2) and (3). Primary outcome completion rates were 95% at 2 weeks, 94% at 2 months, 90% at 4 months, and 89% at 6 months. Greater mean improvement in hip pain intensity (0-10 NRS) over 6 months was seen with BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT alone: -1.43 (95%CI -2.15,-0.72). Greater mean improvement in pain intensity was seen at 2 weeks (-3.17; -4.06,-2.28) and 2 months (-1.81;-2.71,-0.92), but not at 4 (-0.86;-1.78,0.05) or 6 months (0.12; -0.80,1.04). Participants treated with BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT alone had greater mean improvement in function (WOMAC-F -5.47;(-9.41,-1.53)) over 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in hip pain intensity over 6 months between BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT plus USGI lidocaine (-0.52;-1.21,0.18). There was one possible treatment-related serious adverse event: a participant with no signs of infection at randomisation died from endocarditis four months after USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine. BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine was less costly (mean cost difference per participant £-161.59) and associated with significantly higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than BCT only over 6 months (mean difference 0.0477 (0.0257,0.0699). Conclusion USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine plus BCT leads to greater improvements in pain and function over 6 months in adults with hip OA than BCT alone, and was highly cost-effective. There was no significant difference in hip pain intensity between the groups receiving USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine and USGI lidocaine only, raising the possibility of a degree of placebo effect. Disclosures Z. Paskins None. K. Bromley None. M. Lewis None. G. Hughes None. E. Hughes None. A. Cherrington None. A. Hall None. M. Holden None. R. Oppong None. J. Kigozi None. K. Stevenson None. A. Menon None. P. Roberts None. G. Peat None. C. Jinks None. N.E. Foster None. C.D. Mallen None. E. Roddy None.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intra-articular corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection for hip osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial (HIT)

Purpose: Evidence of the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injection for hip osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. The HIT trial compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip injection (USGI) of 40mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4ml 1% lidocaine hydrochloride combined with best current treatment (BCT) with (i) BCT alone (primary objective) and (ii) an USGI of 5ml 1% lidocaine only combined with BCT (EudraCT: 2014-003412-37). Methods: This was a pragmatic, three-parallel group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial in adults with moderate to severe painful hip OA recruited from community musculoskeletal services and primary care. Participants were randomised equally to: (1) BCT alone, (2) BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine, or (3) BCT plus USGI lidocaine only. BCT comprised written information and individualised advice regarding weight loss, exercise, footwear, walking aids and analgesia. Outcomes were collected postally at 2 weeks, 2, 4 and 6 months. The primary outcome was self-reported current hip pain intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)) over 6 months (repeated measures analysis). A wide range of secondary outcomes were measured at each follow-up point including pain and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index, WOMAC), pain self-efficacy, participant’s global impression of change, general health (EQ-5D-5L) and healthcare utilisation. Participants and clinicians were not blind to allocation to BCT alone or injection, however participants randomised to either injection arm were blind to the nature of injection. The research nurse involved in data collection and study statistician were blind to treatment allocation. 204 participants were required to detect a minimum difference of 1 point in mean pain NRS score between arms (1) and (2) with 80% power (5% two-tailed significance level, 15% loss to follow-up). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. To determine the cost-effectiveness of BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT alone, a cost-utility analysis was conducted, adopting an NHS perspective. QALYs were calculated over a period of 6 months using the area under the curve approach. Results: 199 participants were recruited (43% male, mean age 63 years), 67 to arm (1) and 66 each to arms (2) and (3). Primary outcome completion rates were 95% at 2 weeks, 94% at 2 months, 90% at 4 months, and 89% at 6 months. Greater mean improvement in hip pain intensity (0-10 NRS) over 6 months was seen with BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT alone: -1.43 (95% CI -2.15, -0.72). Greater mean improvement in pain intensity was seen at 2 weeks (-3.17; -4.06, -2.28,) and 2 months (-1.81; -2.71, -0.92,), but not at 4 months (-0.86; -1.78, 0.05) or 6 months (0.12; -0.80, 1.04). Participants treated with BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT alone had greater mean improvement in function (WOMAC-F -5.47; (-9.41, -1.53)) and pain self-efficacy (5.87; 2.30, 9.45) over 6 months. More participants reported being completely recovered/much better at 2 months with BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine than with BCT alone (45.4% v 6.9%; relative risk=6.7; 2.5, 17.9). There was no statistically significant difference in hip pain intensity over 6 months between BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT plus USGI lidocaine only (-0.52; -1.21, 0.18). However, a statistically significant difference was seen in favour of the group receiving USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine in comparison to USGI lidocaine alone for a range of secondary outcome measures, over 6 months (e.g. pain self-efficacy, function, and work presenteeism). There was one possible treatment-related serious adverse event: a participant with no signs of infection at randomisation died from endocarditis four months after USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine. BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine was less costly (mean cost difference per participant £-161.59) and associated with significantly higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than BCT only over 6 months (mean difference 0.0477 (0.0257, 0.0699). Increased number of visits to NHS consultants and hip-related surgery in the BCT only group accounted for the majority of cost difference. Conclusions: USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine combined with BCT leads to greater improvements in pain and function over 6 months in adults with hip OA than BCT alone, and was highly cost-effective. There was no significant difference in hip pain intensity over 6 months between the groups receiving USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine and USGI/lidocaine only raising the possibility of a degree of placebo effect.

Therapeutic exercise and radiofrequency in the rehabilitation project for hip osteoarthritis pain.

Severe hip osteoarthritis is responsible for disabling pain and functional impairment of the joint. Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment, some patients have multiple comorbidities that represent contraindications for THA. Conventional drug therapies are often ineffective or responsible for numerous side effects. For these patients, it is difficult to draw up an acceptable rehabilitation path, as the main limitation is intense pain. New rehabilitation strategies that relieve pain and improve articular function need to be developed. The combination of traditional treatments such as education and therapeutic exercise with innovative, minimally-invasive therapies such as continuous radiofrequency (CRF) appears to reduce hip pain by determining the neurolysis of the joint. The aim of our study was to describe the reduction in pain and improvements in joint function when CRF is combined with the therapeutic exercise in rehabilitation of patients with severe hip osteoarthritis. Case series study. Rehabilitation service outpatients. Twenty-five patients with severe hip osteoarthritis causing disabling pain and with contraindications to THA, and for whom conventional drug therapies were ineffective or responsible for numerous side effects. The study design included: initial clinical-functional assessment using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); a pre-lesion anaesthetic block; hip neuroablation with CRF; a three-week kinesitherapy protocol (3 sessions per week); two further assessments using the same scales one month (T1) and six months (T2) after CRF. Improvements at T1 and T2 follow-ups, after CRF (P=0.000) were recorded for articular pain and function. However, results at T2 were worse than those at T1 (P=0.000). CRF combined with therapeutic exercise in rehabilitation of severe hip osteoarthritis is an attractive option for significant pain relief as it allows patients to carry out kinesitherapy more easily. CRF could represent a valid alternative in the rehabilitation of patients with severe hip osteoarthritis especially when other therapeutic approaches are unworkable.

Successful total hip arthroplasty for autosomal dominant osteopetrosis complicated by hip osteoarthritis: A case report and review of the literature.

Osteopetrosis is a rare congenital bone disorder, characterized by systemic osteosclerosis due to a deficiency of or functional defect in osteoclasts. Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (ADOP) is the most common form with a late onset, a stable condition, relatively few symptoms and a good prognosis. Few studies to date have reported successful total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with ADOP and its operative difficulties. We herein describe a case of left hip osteoarthritis in a patient with OP via THA in order to share our experience during the treatment process. The patient was a 52-years-old female with osteopetrosis who was referred to our department due to a history of left hip pain with activity limitation for 20 years. The patient reported no history of fracture or family history. The patient underwent THA in the left hip. At the 6-month, 1- and 2-year follow-up, the components were in a good position and the patient remained asymptomatic and pain-free. Therefore, THA may be a feasible treatment option when patients with ADOP suffer from painful hip osteoarthritis.

Tapentadol Prolonged Release for Severe Chronic Osteoarthritis Pain in the Elderly: Improvements in Daily Functioning and Quality of Life

Background: Chronic osteoarthritis (OA) pain leads to severe impairments in physical functioning and quality of life. Patients & methods: Data of patients with severe chronic knee and/or hip OA pain were extracted from the database of a prospective, noninterventional trial to assess the benefits of tapentadol prolonged release (PR) in elderly patients (>65years of age; n=1162) compared with younger patients (≤65years of age; n=498). Results: Tapentadol PR treatment (up to 3months) significantly reduced pain intensity and pain-related restrictions on daily functioning and significantly improved physical and mental quality of life in both patient groups. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was low. Conclusion: Tapentadol PR is a useful strong analgesic to improve pain intensity, physical functioning and quality of life in elderly OA patients.

The Differences in Imaging Findings Between Painless and Painful Osteoarthritis of the Hip.

Purpose:In osteoarthritis of the hip, the pain may be strong even if the deformity is mild, but the pain may be mild even if the deformity is severe. If the factors related to the pain can be identified on imaging, reducing such factors can alleviate the pain, and effective measures can be taken for cases where surgery cannot be performed. In addition, imaging findings related to the pain are also important information for determining the procedures and the timing of surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify the differences in features of osteoarthritis seen on imaging between painless and painful osteoarthritis of the hip.Methods:The subjects were the patients with hip osteoarthritis who visited our department in 2015 and who underwent x-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a total of 29 patients (54 hip joints; mean age 63 years; 8 males and 21 females). The degree of osteoarthritis was determined using the Tönnis grade from the x-ray image. The cartilage morphology, intensity changes of bone marrow on MRI (subchondral bone marrow lesions [BMLs]), osteophytes, joint effusions, and paralabral cysts were scored based on the Hip Osteoarthritis MRI Scoring System (HOAMS). The cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle at the level of the iliac crest was measured on CT, and the psoas index (PI; the cross-sectional area ratio of the psoas major muscle to the lumbar 4/5 intervertebral disc) was calculated to correct for the difference in physique. Then, the relationships between these and visual analog scale (VAS) scores of pains were evaluated.Results:The average VAS was 55.4 ± 39 mm. The PI and all items of HOAMS correlated with the VAS. The average VAS of Tönnis grade 3 osteoarthritis was 75.8 ± 26 mm. When investigating only Tönnis grade 3 osteoarthritis, the differences between cases with less than average pain and those with above average pain were the BML score in the central-inferior femoral head (P = .0213), the osteophyte score of the inferomedial femoral head (P = .0325), and the PI (P = .0292).Conclusion:Investigation of the differences between painless and painful osteoarthritis of the hip showed that the cases with more pain have BMLs of the femoral head on MRI that extend not only to the loading area, but also to the central-inferior area. Even with the same x-ray findings, the pain was stronger in patients with severe psoas atrophy. Thus, the instability due to muscle atrophy may also play a role in the pain of hip osteoarthritis.

Hip Joint Osteoarthritis Pain Sources and Control

Hip joint osteoarthritis, a widespread disabling disease with no known cause, produces considerable bouts of intractable pain as a result of multiple disease associated problems. This paper examines some sources of osteoarthritic hip joint pain, a poorly understood topic at best. Presented in three parts are data retrieved from several sources, including animal models. It is concluded that to improve the effectiveness of treatments designed to minimize hip osteoarthritis pain, a better understanding of the diverse origins of hip joint pain, and hip joint neurology, may permit the development of more precise as well as targeted pain strategies.

Chronic hip pain in adults: Current knowledge and future prospective.

Chronic hip pain is distressing to the patient as it not only impairs the daily activities of life but also affects the quality of life. Chronic hip pain is difficult to diagnose as patients often present with associated chronic lumbar spine and/or knee joint pain. Moreover, nonorthopaedic causes may also present as chronic hip pain. The accurate diagnosis of chronic hip pain starts with a detailed history of the patient and thorough knowledge of anatomy of the hip joint. Various physical tests are performed to look for the causes of hip pain and investigations to confirm the diagnosis. Management of chronic hip pain should be mechanistic-based multimodal therapy targeting the pain pathway. This narrative review will describe relevant anatomy, causes, assessment, investigation, and management of chronic hip pain. The focus will be on current evidence-based management of hip osteoarthritis, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, meralgia paresthetica, and piriformis syndrome. Recently, there is emphasis on the role of ultrasound in interventional pain procedures. The use of fluoroscopic-guided radiofrequency in periarticular branches of hip joint has reported to provide pain relief of up to 36 months. However, the current evidence for use of platelet-rich plasma in chronic hip osteoarthritis pain is inconclusive. Further research is required in the management of chronic hip pain regarding comparison of fluoroscopic- and ultrasound-guided procedures, role of platelet-rich plasma, and radiofrequency procedures with long-term follow-up of patients.

81. Nature of neurological deficits influences the treatment order preference for hip-spine syndrome

BACKGROUND CONTEXT With the aging of society, patients with concurrent degenerative lumbar disorders and hip osteoarthritis, also referred to as the syndrome, are frequently evaluated by both and arthroplasty surgeons. The decision-making can be straightforward in many but in others, the optimal treatment order—spine surgery or total hip arthroplasty (THA) first—remains unclear and complicated, especially when neurological deficits are involved. PURPOSE To compare, in and arthroplasty surgeons respectively, the treatment order preference among four typical scenarios of hip-spine syndrome with different neurological symptoms. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Prospective survey at a professional society level. PATIENT SAMPLE Eighty-eight experienced (37) and total hip arthroplasty (51) surgeons from the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and The Hip Society, respectively. OUTCOME MEASURES Percentage of surgeons, in each specialty, choosing spine first in each scenario. METHODS Four fictional patients were devised to have concurrent degenerative lumbar disorders and painful hip osteoarthritis, with the primary neurological symptom in each scenario being (a) radicular leg pain, (b) neurogenic claudication, (c) leg and (d) respectively. A survey with history, physical examination, and radiographs was formulated and sent to clinical members of SRS and The Hip Society soliciting their treatment order preference—spine surgery or THA first—and their rationale. Surgeons' choices, as measured by the percentage choosing spine surgery first, were compared among the four scenarios and between the two specialties. Text-mining was used to summarize the rationale for decision-making by identifying the most frequently used words in surgeons' comments. RESULTS Responses were received from 37 (37/100, 37%) surgeons and 51 (51/101, 50%) arthroplasty surgeons across North America. In both specialties, the percentage choosing spine first varied in the same fashion among the four scenarios. Myelopathy, leg neurogenic claudication, and radicular pain, in that order, drove the decision-making toward spine first (97%, 73%, 46% and 8% of the surgeons and 86%, 45%, 33%, and 18% of the arthroplasty surgeons chose spine first). Only in the scenario of leg weakness did a significant disparity noted between the two specialties: surgeons were more sensitive to weakness than arthroplasty surgeons (73% vs 45% choosing spine first, P=0.017). In both specialties, text-mining showed that the words that describe the symptoms or pathologies of the neurological deficits, such as stenosis, weakness, and myelopathy, were most frequently used in surgeons' comments in most scenarios except for that of radicular pain. CONCLUSIONS The nature of neurological deficits influences the treatment order preference for hip-spine syndrome in both and arthroplasty surgeons, with neurogenic claudication, and radicular pain, in this order, driving the decision-making toward performing surgery first. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Association of weather to the risk of hip osteoarthritis pain exacerbations

Association of weather to the risk of hip osteoarthritis pain exacerbations

Treatment of chronic osteoarthritic hip pain with phenol neurolysis of the obturator nerve Quadfen 1

The conservative treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is essentially symptomatic, seeking to relieve pain and optimize function. Despite presenting great clinical effect, hip arthroplasty may have restrictions, and in these situations, the neurolytic blockade of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve can be a therapeutic alternative, since it stops the afferent pain from the hip joint. Objective: To describe the results of treating patients with severe OA of the hip by applying phenol to the obturator nerve. Method: Twelve consecutive patients with OA of the hip, refractory to conservative treatment, were recruited to have the obturator nerve localized through electrostimulation and blocked with phenol. They were evaluated in terms of pain intensity via the visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure dolorimetry in the medial and lateral gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, and piriformis, and quality of life by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at baseline (BL) after 1 (M1), 2 (M2), and 6 months (M6). Results: The patients were between 30 and 72 years old with an avarege of 47.5 ± 1.7 years old, 5 of them were women. Three patients were excluded for not being able to come for follow up evaluations. VAS values vaieded from 8.2 ±.0.9 at BL to 6.6 ± 1.7 at M1, 6.5 ± 1.7 at M2, and 7.3 ± 1 in M6 (p=0.0094). As to the HHS, the values were BL:33.27 ± 2.9; M1:39.2 ± 6.4; M2:40.2 ± 8.1, and M6: 38.8 ± 9.7 in the final evaluation (p=0,040). For dolorimetry, non significant variation was BL: 11±5.7, M1: 7.9±2.2; M2: 10.9±5.6; M6: 8.1 ± 1.6 (p 0.69). Conclusion: The application of phenol to the anterior branch of the obturator nerve can be an alternative in the treatment of severe OA of the hip in patients with restrictions to Total Hip Replacement (THR), since it reduces pain and improves quality of life.

When is indicated viscosupplementation in hip osteoarthritis?

Background and aim: The incidence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is increasing in parallel with the aging of the population. The aim of this study is to report the efficacy of an ultrasound-guided intra-articular (IA) hip injection of a single dose of high-weight hyaluronic acid (HA) (2500 kDa) at a follow-up of 12 months. Materials and Methods: 226 patients older than 40 years of age affected by painful hip OA (Kellgren-Lawrence stage 1-2-3) were treated from January 2012 to December 2015 with viscosupplementation. Patients were clinically evaluated before injection (T0) and after 3 months (T3), 6 months (T6) and 1 year (T3) through the WOMAC scale and Harris Hip Score (HHS). Results: During the follow-up period no patients underwent to hip surgery or need adjunctive IA injection of HA. No adverse effects were registered. An improvement in WOMAC and HHS was observed in all patients after treatment. Results showed that patients with grade 2 of osteoarthritis had the higher delta of change in the scores. Discussion: Ultrasound-guided with high weight IA HA injection could be a possibility of treatment in the symptomatic osteoarthritic hip. Subjects with a moderate grade of osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence stage 2) represent the group that could report the maximum benefits from viscosupplementation. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Evaluating the use of intra-articular injections as a treatment for painful hip osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study comparing a single 6-mL injection of hylan G-F 20 with saline

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is difficult to treat. Steroid injections reduce pain with short duration. With widespread adoption of office-based, image-guided injections, hyaluronic acid is a potentially relevant therapy. In the largest clinical trial to-date, we compared safety/efficacy of a single, 6-mL image-guided injection of hylan G-F 20 to saline in painful hip OA. 357 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized saline placebo- controlled trial. Subjects were ≥35 years of age, with painful (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]-A1:5.0-8.0; numeric rating scale [NRS]: 0-10) mild-to-moderate hip OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II/III) and minimal contralateral hip pain (WOMAC-A1<4). Outcome measures included "pain on walking" (WOMAC-A1 and -A), Patient Global Self-Assessment (PTGA), WOMAC-A1 responder rate (+≥2 points on NRS), and adverse events (AEs) over 26 weeks. 357 patients (hylan G-F 20 single:182; saline:175) were enrolled. Both groups demonstrated significant pain improvement from baseline over 26 weeks (P<0.0001); saline-induced pain reduction was a remarkable 35%. WOMAC-A and PTGA scores also significantly improved (P<0.0001). No statistically significant difference was observed between groups in WOMAC-A1 scores (hylan G-F 20 single:-2.19±0.16; saline:-2.26±0.17) or WOMAC-A1 responders (41-52%). Treatment-related AE rates at target hip were similar (hylan G-F 20 single:23 patients [12.8%]; saline:12 [7.0%]). Posthoc analysis found, despite protocol requirements, many patients had psychological (31%) or potential neuropathic pain (27.5%) conditions. A single 6-mL hylan G-F 20 injection or saline for painful hip OA resulted in similar, statistically significant/clinically relevant pain and function improvements up to 6 months following injection; no differences between hylan G-F 20 and saline placebo were observed.

Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis.

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of pain and functional limitation. Few hip OA treatments have been evaluated for safety and effectiveness. Acupuncture is a traditional Chinese medical therapy which aims to treat disease by inserting very thin needles at specific points on the body. To assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture in patients with hip OA. We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase all through March 2018. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture, another active treatment, or no specific treatment; and RCTs that evaluated acupuncture as an addition to another treatment. Major outcomes were pain and function at the short term (i.e. < 3 months after randomization) and adverse events. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Six RCTs with 413 participants were included. Four RCTs included only people with OA of the hip, and two included a mix of people with OA of the hip and knee. All RCTs included primarily older participants, with a mean age range from 61 to 67 years, and a mean duration of hip OA pain from two to eight years. Approximately two-thirds of participants were women. Two RCTs compared acupuncture versus sham acupuncture; the other four RCTs were not blinded. All results were evaluated at short term (i.e. four to nine weeks after randomization).In the two RCTs that compared acupuncture to sham acupuncture, the sham acupuncture control interventions were judged believable, but each sham acupuncture intervention was also judged to have a risk of weak acupuncture-specific effects, due to placement of non-penetrating needles at the correct acupuncture points in one RCT, and the use of penetrating needles not inserted at the correct points in the other RCT. For these two sham-controlled RCTs, the risk of bias was low for all outcomes.The combined analysis of two sham-controlled RCTs gave moderate quality evidence of little or no effect in reduction in pain for acupuncture relative to sham acupuncture. Due to the small sample sizes in the studies, the confidence interval includes both the possibility of moderate benefit and the possibility of no effect of acupuncture (120 participants; Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) -0.13, (95% Confidence Interval (CI) -0.49 to 0.22); 2.1 points greater improvement with acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture on 100 point scale (i.e., absolute percent change -2.1% (95% CI -7.9% to 3.6%)); relative percent change -4.1% (95% CI -15.6% to 7.0%)). Estimates of effect were similar for function (120 participants; SMD -0.15, (95% CI -0.51 to 0.21)). No pooled estimate, representative of the two sham-controlled RCTs, could be calculated or reported for the quality of life outcome.The four other RCTs were unblinded comparative effectiveness RCTs, which compared (additional) acupuncture to four different active control treatments.There was low quality evidence that addition of acupuncture to the routine primary care that RCT participants were receiving from their physicians was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant benefits, compared to the routine primary physician care alone, in pain (1 RCT; 137 participants; mean percent difference -22.9% (95% CI -29.2% to -16.6%); relative percent difference -46.5% (95% CI -59.3% to -33.7%)) and function (mean percent difference -19.0% (95% CI -24.41 to -13.59); relative percent difference -38.6% (95% CI -49.6% to -27.6%)). There was no statistically significant difference for mental quality of life and acupuncture showed a small, significant benefit for physical quality of life.The effects of acupuncture compared with either advice plus exercise or NSAIDs are uncertain.We are also uncertain whether acupuncture plus patient education improves pain, function, and quality of life, when compared to patient education alone.In general, the overall quality of the evidence for the four comparative effectiveness RCTs was low to very low, mainly due to the potential for biased reporting of patient-assessed outcomes due to lack of blinding and sparse data.Information on safety was reported in four RCTs. Two RCTs reported minor side effects of acupuncture, which were primarily minor bruising, bleeding, or pain at needle insertion sites. Four RCTs reported on adverse events, and none reported any serious adverse events attributed to acupuncture. Acupuncture probably has little or no effect in reducing pain or improving function relative to sham acupuncture in people with hip osteoarthritis. Due to the small sample size in the studies, the confidence intervals include both the possibility of moderate benefits and the possibility of no effect of acupuncture. One unblinded trial found that acupuncture as an addition to routine primary physician care was associated with benefits on pain and function. However, these reported benefits are likely due at least partially to RCT participants' greater expectations of benefit from acupuncture. Possible side effects associated with acupuncture treatment were minor.

Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: a 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesGuidelines recommend intra-articular glucocorticoid injection in patients with painful hip osteoarthritis. However, intra-articular hip injection is an invasive procedure. The efficacy of systemic glucocorticoid treatment for pain reduction in hip...

Serum and synovial fluid cytokine profiling in hip osteoarthritis: distinct from knee osteoarthritis and correlated with pain

BackgroundInflammation is associated with the onset and progression of osteoarthritis in multiple joints. It is well known that mechanical properties differ between different joints, however, it remains unknown if the inflammatory process is similar/distinct in patients with hip vs. knee OA. Without complete understanding of the role of any specific cytokine in the inflammatory process, understanding the ‘profile’ of inflammation in a given patient population is an essential starting point. The aim of this study was to identify serum cytokine profiles in hip Osteoarthritis (OA), and investigate the association between cytokine concentrations and clinical measurements within this patient population and compare these findings to knee OA and healthy control cohorts.MethodsIn total, 250 serum samples (100 knee OA, 50 hip OA and 100 control) and 37 synovial fluid samples (8 knee OA, 14 hip OA and 15 control) were analyzed using a multiplex ELISA based approach. Synovial biopsies were also obtained and examined for specific cytokines. Pain, physical function and activity within the hip OA cohort were examined using the HOOS, SF-36, HHS and UCLA outcome measures.ResultsThe three cohorts showed distinct serum cytokine profiles. EGF, FGF2, MCP3, MIP1α, and IL8 were differentially expressed between hip and knee OA cohorts; while FGF2, GRO, IL8, MCP1, and VEGF were differentially expressed between hip OA and control cohorts. Eotaxin, GRO, MCP1, MIP1β, VEGF were differentially expressed between knee OA and control cohorts. EGF, IL8, MCP1, MIP1β were differentially expressed in synovial fluid from a sub-set of patients from each cohort. Specifically within the hip OA cohort, IL-6, MDC and IP10 were associated with pain and were also found to be present in synovial fluid and synovial membrane (except IL-6) of patients with hip OA.ConclusionOA may include different inflammatory subtypes according to affected joints and distinct inflammatory processes may drive OA in these joints. IL6, MDC and IP10 are associated with hip OA pain and these proteins may be able to provide additional information regarding pain in hip OA patients.