Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with fracture risk and deconditioning. Exercise training can attenuate functional declines, but the safety of exercise in this population remains unclear. PURPOSE: This case series explores the clinical history, considerations for triage, program adaptations, and functional changes in patients with MM taking part in the Alberta Cancer Exercise (ACE) study. METHODS: An exercise physiologist screened cases using a cancer-specific intake and the PAR-Q+. Due to MM diagnosis, physician approval was required for entry into the ACE study. ACE involved 60 mins of community or clinic-based exercise 2x/wk for 12 weeks. Pre/post measures included the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), 30s sit-to-stand, sit and reach, and optional max bench press (1RM) and plank tests. RESULTS: CASE 1: 54-year old male on chemotherapy with a history of lytic lesions throughout the thoracic cage and pelvis, and radiation therapy (RT) to large lytic lesions in the pelvis and left clavicle. Goal: improve fitness for upcoming stem cell transplantation (SCT). Physician recommendation: controlled low loading due to fracture risk. Approved for community (1x/wk) and clinic-based (1x/wk) exercise. CASE 2: 37-year old female diagnosed with MM without bone involvement, receiving chemo and targeted therapy. She had undergone surgery and was recovering from a SCT. Goal: reduce fatigue and improve fitness. Approved for clinic-based exercise with transition to community after 12 wks. CASE 3: 54-year old female on maintenance chemo with multiple lytic lesions, history of cervicothoracic decompression, reduction and instrumentation C5-T3, and prior RT to spine and pelvis. Goal: improve fitness, strength and health. Approved for clinic-based exercise. Physician recommendation: low intensity exercise due to fracture risk and pain. No adverse events occurred and increases were seen across cases in 6MWT (8.2%, 5.6%, 9.5%), sit-to-stand (0%, 18.8%, 5.9%), sit and reach (18.6%, 56.7%, 42.2%), 1RM (4.1%, 21.4%, N/A), and plank (36.8%, 50%, N/A). CONCLUSIONS: The cases presented with unique complications and apprehension towards exercise. Presence and location of lytic lesions, fracture history and risk, surgical history, and treatment stage were key considerations for exercise triage and adaptations within the ACE program.