Pediatric Preparedness Research Articles

Pediatric emergency department readiness among US trauma hospitals

Pediatric readiness among US emergency departments is not universal. Trauma hospitals adhere to standards that may support day-to-day readiness for children. In 2013 4,146 emergency departments participated in the NPRP to assess compliance with the 2009 Guidelines to Care for Children in the Emergency Department. Probabilistic linkage (90%) to the 2009 American Hospital Association survey found 1,247 self-identified trauma hospitals (levels 1, 2, 3, 4). Relationship between trauma hospital level and weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) on a 100-point scale was performed; significance was assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis test and pediatric readiness elements using χ. Adjusted relative risks were calculated using modified Poisson regression, controlling for pediatric volume, hospital configuration, and geography. The overall WPRS among all trauma hospitals (1,247) was 71.8. Among those not self-identified as a children's hospital or emergency department approved for pediatrics (EDAP) (1088), Level 1 and 2 trauma hospitals had higher WPRS than level 3 and 4 trauma hospitals, 83.5 and 71.8, respectively versus 64.9 and 62.6. Yet, compared with EDAP trauma hospitals (median 90.5), level 1 general trauma hospitals were less likely to have critical pediatric-specific elements. Common gaps among general trauma hospitals included presence of interfacility transfer agreements for children, measurement of pediatric weights solely in kilograms, quality improvement processes with pediatric-specific metrics, and disaster plans that include pediatric-specific needs. Self-identified trauma hospital level may not translate to pediatric readiness in emergency departments. Across all levels of general non-EDAP, nonchildren's trauma hospitals, gaps in pediatric readiness exist. Nonchildren's hospital EDs (i.e., EDAPs) can be prepared to meet the emergency needs of all children and trauma hospital designation should incorporate these core elements of pediatric readiness. Care management, level III.

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist Does Impact Pediatric Disaster Planning and Preparedness in Chicago: A Comparison of 2012 and 2016 EMSC Facility Recognition Surveys

Introduction:The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Facility Recognition Program was implemented in 1998. The objective was to identify the capability of a hospital to provide optimal pediatric emergency and critical care. Beginning in 2004, steps were taken to integrate pediatric disaster preparedness into the facility recognition process.Aim:The goal of this study was to identify the impact of the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist across time in Chicago hospitals undergoing Pediatric Facility Recognition.Methods:Chicago hospitals were evaluated during the 2012 and 2016 Pediatric Facility Recognition Program. The following components were surveyed as they relate to pediatrics: Overall Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Surge Capacity, Decontamination, Reunification/Patient Tracking, Security, Evacuation, Mass Casualty Triage/JumpSTART, Children with Special Health Care Needs/Children with Functional Access Needs, Pharmaceutical Preparedness, Recovery, Exercise/Drills/Trainings. Data from 2012 and 2014 checklist categories were compared and p-values were computed utilizing Fisher’s Exact Test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Stockpiling of staging areas or having ready access to resuscitation supplies increased 46% (p < 0.05), testing of pediatric surge capacity in previous 24 months decreased 43% (p < 0.05), maintaining warmed water source for decontamination decreased 43% (p < 0.05), and having familiarity of evacuation procedures in ED, pediatric, and nursery personnel decreased 42% (p < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, the training of pediatric staff with JumpSTART triage increased 59%, EOP containing a pediatric reunification process increased by 36%, the presence of specific staff plans to allow care of dependents increased for children (29%), elderly (32%) and pets (35%), integration of a pediatric component into hospital EOP increased by 29%, and identification of an alternate treatment site for children decreased by 25%.Discussion:Integrating the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist surveys into the facility recognition process impacts pediatric disaster preparedness and planning, and identifies areas of improvement in hospitals.

Pediatric Outpatient/Urgent-Care Emergency and Disaster Planning

Introduction:Children are frequently victims of disasters, however important gaps remain in pediatric disaster planning. This includes a lack of resources for pediatric preparedness planning for patients in outpatient/urgent-care facilities. The New York City Pediatric Disaster Coalition (NYCPDC) is funded by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to improve NYC’s pediatric disaster preparedness and response.Aim:After creating planning resources in Pediatric Long-Term Care Facilities, Hospital Pediatric Departments, Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units and Obstetric/Newborn Services within NYC hospitals, the NYCPDC partnered with leaders and experts from outpatient/urgent-care facilities caring for pediatric patients and created the Pediatric Outpatient Disaster Planning Committee (PODPC). PODPC’s goal was to create guidelines and templates for use in disaster planning for pediatric patients at outpatient/urgent-care facilities.Methods:The PODPC includes physicians, nurses, administrators, and emergency planning experts who have experience working with outpatient facilities. There were 21 committee members from eight organizations (the NYCPDC, DOHMH, Community Healthcare Association of NY State, NY State DOH, NYC Health and Hospitals, Maimonides Medical Center and Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center). The committee met six times over a four-month period and shared information to create disaster planning tools that meet the specific pediatric challenges in the outpatient setting.Results:Utilizing an iterative process including literature review, participant presentations, discussions review, and improvement of working documents, the final guidelines and templates for surge and evacuation of pediatric patients in outpatient/urgent care facilities were created in February 2018. Subsequently, model plans were completed and implemented at five NYC outpatient/urgent-care facilities.Discussion:An expert committee utilizing an iterative process successfully created disaster guidelines and templates for pediatric outpatient/urgent care facilities. They addressed the importance of matching the special needs of children to available space, staff, and equipment needs and created model plans for site-specific use.

The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist - An Innovative Approach to Improving Pediatric Disaster Planning and Preparedness in Chicago

Introduction:The Illinois EMSC Pediatric Facility Recognition Program was implemented in 1998. The objective was to identify the capability of a hospital to provide optimal pediatric emergency and critical care. Beginning in 2004, steps were taken to integrate pediatric disaster preparedness into the facility recognition process.Aim:The goal of this study was to identify strengths and areas for improvement in pediatric disaster preparedness in participating Chicago hospitals.Methods:The impact of the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist was assessed during the 2016 Pediatric Facility Recognition hospital site surveys. The following components were surveyed as they relate to pediatrics: Overall Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Surge Capacity, Decontamination, Reunification/Patient Tracking, Security, Evacuation, Mass Casualty Triage/JumpSTART, Children with Special Health Care Needs/Children with Functional Access Needs, Pharmaceutical Preparedness, Recovery, Exercise/Drills/Trainings. All survey items were extracted, collated, and reviewed.Results:Fourteen Chicago hospitals participated in the survey. Almost all hospitals (93%) surveyed indicated that they consult staff with pediatric expertise when updating their EOP, incorporate pediatric trained mental health professionals into their disaster call lists (93%), and integrate staff with pediatric focus into their incident command system/emergency operation center during a disaster (79%). Almost all of the hospitals (93%) had an infant/child abduction plan and all hospitals (100%) were testing the process at least once per year. Finally, almost all of the hospitals (93%) had incorporated a patient connection program into their tracking and reunification plan. However, not all hospitals included drills for pediatric surge, decontamination, and evacuation. Less than one-third of the hospitals had pediatric components in their alternate treatment site plans. Half of the hospitals did not have pediatric components incorporated into their decontamination plans.Discussion:Integrating the EMSC Pediatric Preparedness Checklist surveys into the recognition process is an innovative approach to improve pediatric disaster planning and preparedness in hospitals.

3455 Association between Transfer of Children from the Emergency Department and Pediatric Readiness of the Hospital

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: As pediatric care becomes more concentrated in large urban hospitals, smaller rural hospitals with reduced pediatric care capacity may opt to transfer pediatric patients to higher levels of care even if the patient has a condition that is manageable in a general ED. Up to 20-40% of pediatric transfers are considered avoidable, placing a burden on the patient, their family and the health care system. The aim of this study is to determine the association between pediatric readiness (as measured by the National Pediatric Readiness Project score) and risk of interfacility transfer. We hypothesized that emergency departments with higher measures of pediatric readiness would be less likely to transfer pediatric patients to another facility. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The most recent and complete National Pediatric Readiness Project data were from 300 California hospitals in 2012. These data include the overall pediatric readiness score, presence of inter-facility guidelines (written protocols on patients needing care not available at the hospital), presence of interfacility agreements (written agreements with other hospitals regarding transfer patients), and other variables on the facility’s capacity to care for pediatric patients. We linked these hospital data with patient encounter data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Emergency Department (ED) Database (OSHPD) using hospital name and zip code. To be eligible for the study, the patient must have a documented ED encounter and be less than 18 years old during the encounter. A patient was considered a transfer patient if they were transferred to a separate general hospital, children’s hospital, federal health care facility, rehabilitation facility, Critical Access Hospital or psychiatric hospital. Chi-square tests and t-tests were used for descriptive statistics. For non-normal data, we used the non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis test. We also used logistic regression to compare the odds of transfer between comparison groups. Statistical analyses were conducted in the R environment version 3.4.4. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 2012, there were 2,604,723 pediatric ED encounters, of which 10,966 resulted in a transfer (0.4%). Transferred patients on average were older (15 vs. 5 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be female (58.6% vs 46.6%, p < 0.001). The transfer group originated from hospitals with a lower median pediatric readiness score (76.0 vs 78.3, p < 0.001). Patients were less likely to be transferred if they were seen at a hospital with written guidelines with transfer protocols (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83—0.95, p < 0.001). Patients were more likely to be transferred if they were seen at a hospital with written interfacility agreements with other hospitals (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.10—1.25, p < 0.001). We anticipate, that even with more sophisticated multilevel statistical models, pediatric readiness scores will remain associated with odds of transfer. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These preliminary data suggest that hospitals with higher levels of pediatric readiness and written guidelines with transfer protocols are less likely to transfer pediatric patients. There may be actionable policy and procedural items that a hospital could enact to lower the rate of transfer patients. Future analyses will include more complex statistical modeling to adjust for confounders, will include inpatient data, and will compare the risk of potentially avoidable transfers between hospitals with varying levels of pediatric readiness.

Remick K, Gausche-Hill M, Joseph MM, Brown K, Snow SK, Wright JL; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency medicine and Section on Surgery; American College of Emergency Physicians Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee; Emergency Nurses Association Pediatric Committee. Pediatric Preparedness in the Emergency Department. Pediatrics. 2018;142(5):e20182459.

Remick K, Gausche-Hill M, Joseph MM, Brown K, Snow SK, Wright JL; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency medicine and Section on Surgery; American College of Emergency Physicians Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee; Emergency Nurses Association Pediatric Committee. Pediatric Preparedness in the Emergency Department. Pediatrics. 2018;142(5):e20182459.

Consensus Statement on Urgent Care Centers and Retail Clinics in Acute Care of Children.

This article provides recommendations for pediatric readiness, scope of services, competencies, staffing, emergency preparedness, and transfer of care coordination for urgent care centers (UCCs) and retail clinics that provide pediatric care. It also provides general recommendations for the use of telemedicine in these establishments. With continuing increases in wait times and overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments and the mounting challenges in obtaining timely access to primary care providers, a new trend is gaining momentum for the treatment of minor illness and injuries in the form of UCCs and retail clinics. As pediatric visits to these establishments increase, considerations should be made for the type of injury or illnesses that can be safely treated, the required level training and credentials of personnel needed, the proper equipment and resources to specifically care for children, and procedures for safe transfer to a higher level of care, when needed. When used appropriately, UCCs and retail clinics can be valuable and convenient patient care resources.

Pediatric Readiness in the Emergency Department.

This is a revision of the previous joint Policy Statement titled "Guidelines for Care of Children in the Emergency Department." Children have unique physical and psychosocial needs that are heightened in the setting of serious or life-threatening emergencies. The majority of children who are ill and injured are brought to community hospital emergency departments (EDs) by virtue of proximity. It is therefore imperative that all EDs have the appropriate resources (medications, equipment, policies, and education) and capable staff to provide effective emergency care for children. In this Policy Statement, we outline the resources necessary for EDs to stand ready to care for children of all ages. These recommendations are consistent with the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (now called the National Academy of Medicine) in its report "The Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System." Although resources within emergency and trauma care systems vary locally, regionally, and nationally, it is essential that ED staff, administrators, and medical directors seek to meet or exceed these recommendations to ensure that high-quality emergency care is available for all children. These updated recommendations are intended to serve as a resource for clinical and administrative leadership in EDs as they strive to improve their readiness for children of all ages.

Adherence to Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Guidelines Across a Spectrum of Fifty Emergency Departments: A Prospective, In Situ, Simulation-based Study.

Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival outcomes are dismal (<10%). Care that is provided in adherence to established guidelines has been associated with improved survival. Lower mortality rates have been reported in higher-volume hospitals, teaching hospitals, and trauma centers. The primary objective of this article was to explore the relationship of hospital characteristics, such as annual pediatric patient volume, to adherence to pediatric cardiac arrest guidelines during an insitu simulation. Secondary objectives included comparing adherence to other team, provider, and system factors. This prospective, multicenter, observational study evaluated interprofessional teams in their native emergency department (ED) resuscitation bays caring for a simulated 5-year-old child presenting in cardiac arrest. The primary outcome, adherence to the American Heart Association pediatric guidelines, was assessed using a 14-item tool including three component domains: basic life support (BLS), pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and ventricular fibrillation (VF). Provider, team, and hospital-level data were collected as independent data. EDs were evaluated in four pediatric volume groups (low<1,800/year; medium 1,800-4,999; medium-high 5,000-9,999; high>10,000). Cardiac arrest adherence and domains were evaluated by pediatric patient volume and other team and hospital-level characteristics, and path analyses were performed to evaluate the contribution of patient volume, systems readiness, and teamwork on BLS, PEA, and VF adherence. A total of 101 teams from a spectrum of 50 EDs participated including nine low pediatric volume (<1,800/year), 36 medium volume (1,800-4,999/year), 24 medium-high (5,000-9,999/year), and 32 high volume (≥10000/year). The median total adherence score was 57.1 (interquartile range= 50.0-78.6). This was not significantly different across the four volume groups. The highest level of adherence for BLS and PEA domains was noted in the medium-high-volume sites, while no difference was noted for the VF domain. The lowest level of BLS adherence was noted in the lowest-volume EDs. Improved adherence was not directly associated with higher pediatric readiness survey (PRS) score provider experience, simulation teamwork performance, or more providers with Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) training. EDs in teaching hospitals with a trauma center designation that served only children demonstrated higher adherence compared to nonteaching hospitals (64.3 vs 57.1), nontrauma centers (64.3 vs. 57.1), and mixed pediatric and adult departments (67.9 vs. 57.1), respectively. The overall effect sizes for total cardiac adherence score are ED type γ=0.47 and pediatric volume (low and medium vs. medium-high and high) γ=0.41. A series of path analyses models was conducted that indicated that overall pediatric ED volume predicted significantly better guideline adherence, but the effect of volume on performance was only mediated by the PRS for the VF domain. This study demonstrated variable adherence to pediatric cardiac arrest guidelines across a spectrum of EDs. Overall adherence was not associated with ED pediatric volume. Medium-high-volume EDs demonstrated the highest levels of adherence for BLS and PEA. Lower-volume EDs were noted to have lower adherence to BLS guidelines. Improved adherence was not directly associated with higher PRS score provider experience, simulation teamwork performance, or more providers with PALS training. This study demonstrates that current approaches optimizing the care of children in cardiac arrest in the ED (provider training, teamwork training, environmental preparation) are insufficient.

National Pediatric Readiness Project: Making a Difference Through Collaboration, Simulation, and Measurement of the Quality of Pediatric Emergency Care

The National Pediatric Readiness Project is a national quality initiative sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Emergency Nurses Association. Multiple efforts across numerous states are in process to optimize pediatric readiness of emergency departments. This article describes past, current, and future efforts to ensure pediatric readiness of our nations' emergency departments and to understand the relationship between pediatric readiness and quality of pediatric emergency care.

Nurses Are Integral to the Success of EMS for Children

Nurses, particularly emergency nurses, have long been involved with Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) at the local, state, and national level. Partnerships with several professional nursing associations, including the Emergency Nurses Association, have championed the mission of EMSC. These partnerships have been essential to ensuring pediatric emergency readiness, disaster preparedness, and education across the Health Resources and Services EMSC program. Emergency nurses are actively engaged in quality improvement work with the Facility Recognition Collaborative and the Pediatric Readiness Quality Collaborative with their EMSC partners, as well as research through the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. In the future, continuing to leverage and expand partnerships with professional nurses and nursing organizations is an important component to the success and growth of EMSC.

The Current State of the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Workforce and Innovations to Improve Pediatric Care

Many hospitals and emergency departments lack resources to optimally care for ill and injured children, perpetuating risks of receiving fragmented and “uneven” care. In this article, we describe the present state of our pediatric emergency medicine workforce as well as the impact that different innovations could have on the future of pediatric emergency care. Many innovative initiatives, including physician and advanced practice provider education and training, pediatric readiness recognition programs, telemedicine and in-situ simulation outreach, and community paramedicine are being utilized to help bridge access gaps and augment the reach of the pediatric emergency medicine workforce. Advocacy for reimbursement for novel care delivery models, such as community paramedicine and telemedicine, and funding for outreach education is essential. Also, better understanding of our current training models for and utilization of advanced practice practitioners in pediatric emergency medicine is crucial to understanding the diversity of workforce growth and opportunity.

Pediatric Readiness in Critical Access Hospital Emergency Departments.

Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs), often the first point of access for emergency care, see few children and are challenged to remain proficient in caring for pediatric patients. Our analysis provides guidance to facilitate increasing CAHs staffs' ability to provide effective pediatric emergency care. The National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) assessment of 4,146 emergency departments (EDs) was linked with the CAHs list from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS). A WPRS of 100 indicates that the ED meets essential guidelines for pediatric readiness. Using descriptive statistics, we also compared low (fewer than 5 children a day) and medium patient volume (5-14 children a day) EDs in 6 core areas of readiness. Eighty-six percent (1,140) of CAHs were linked to the NPRP. In the study, 80% were low and 20% medium volume. The median WPRS was 59.0 for low and 67.3 for medium volume. While some differences were found by patient volume, overall 63% of CAHs had a pediatric emergency care coordinator, 34% had a pediatric patient care review process, 62% had interfacility transfer guidelines, and 45% weighed children only in kilograms. CAHs participating in a facility recognition program had significantly higher median WPRS scores (84.3) compared to those not participating (59.5). CAHs have challenges in being ready to care for children in the areas of pediatric emergency care coordinators, policies, procedures, and patient safety. Minimal cost interventions are available to increase the readiness of CAHs to care for children.

A Simulation-Based Quality Improvement Initiative Improves Pediatric Readiness in Community Hospitals.

The National Pediatric Readiness Project Pediatric Readiness Survey (PRS) measured pediatric readiness in 4149 US emergency departments (EDs) and noted an average score of 69 on a 100-point scale. This readiness score consists of 6 domains: coordination of pediatric patient care (19/100), physician/nurse staffing and training (10/100), quality improvement activities (7/100), patient safety initiatives (14/100), policies and procedures (17/100), and availability of pediatric equipment (33/100). We aimed to assess and improve pediatric emergency readiness scores across Connecticut's hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the National Pediatric Readiness Project readiness score before and after an in situ simulation-based assessment and quality improvement program in Connecticut hospitals. We leveraged in situ simulations to measure the quality of resuscitative care provided by interprofessional teams to 3 simulated patients (infant septic shock, infant seizure, and child cardiac arrest) presenting to their ED resuscitation bay. Assessments of EDs were made based on a composite quality score that was measured as the sum of 4 distinct domains: (1) adherence to sepsis guidelines, (2) adherence to cardiac arrest guidelines, (3) performance on seizure resuscitation, and (4) teamwork. After the simulation, a detailed report with scores, comparisons to other EDs, and a gap analysis were provided to sites. Based on this report, a regional children's hospital team worked collaboratively with each ED to develop action items and a timeline for improvements. The National Pediatric Readiness Project PRS scores, the primary outcome of this study, were measured before and after participation. Twelve community EDs in Connecticut participated in this project. The PRS scores were assessed before and after the intervention (simulation-based assessment and gap analysis/report-out). The average time between PRS assessments was 21 months. The PRS scores significantly improved 12.9% from the first assessment (mean ± SEM = 64 ± 4.4) to the second assessment (77 ± 4.0, P = 0.022). The PRS score domains also showed improvements in coordination of pediatric patient care (median improvement, 50%), quality improvement activities (median improvement, 79%), patient safety initiatives (mean improvement, 7%), policies and procedures (mean improvement, 17%), and availability of pediatric equipment (mean improvement, 7%). Participation in a simulation-based quality improvement collaborative was associated with improvements in pediatric readiness.

Preparing paediatric public health services for disability sector reform: linking across services and sectors to translate policy into practice

Introduction: The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a transformational reform of Australia’s disability sector, bringing complete disruption to long established relationships, pathways and processes that link the disability sector with mainstream services. Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (CHQHHS) and the Queensland Child and Youth Clinical Network (QCYCN) have partnered to lead an integrated approach to preparing for disability sector reform to enable paediatric health service and workforce readiness. Description of Policy Context: The NDIS roll-out is occurring in a complex and dynamic environment where the implications of policy decisions are fully understood only as the change occurs. Health and other services need to make informed yet flexible decisions to ensure that service models, systems and practices fit with the new context. Targeted population: Stakeholders active in the paediatric health-disability interface Highlights: Partnerships that enable translation and communication of the implications of disability sector reform, including the differentiated roles and responsibilities of health and disability Collaborations that support clinical and health information systems prepare for cross-sector reform and mitigate associated risk Robust linkages across Health Services, mainstream providers and the emerging disability sector to improve access and outcomes for children with a disability and their families. Conclusion: The NDIS continues to be a catalyst for partnerships to enhance care for children with complex and chronic conditions and to understand and operationalise the differentiated business of the health and disability sectors. Proactive collaboration along the continuum of care and across service sectors has proved to be an efficient and effective way of building capacity ahead of the NDIS.

Not all emergency departments are alike

A medical emergency requires timely, immediate care. With that in mind, the notion that certain conditions require special expertise is not new, nor the concept that outcomes are improved when emergent care is provided in specified centers rather than in the closest available emergency department (ED). The result is the creation of trauma centers, stroke centers, and the like. The same could be said for the ability to render appropriate care to children. A prior project, the National Pediatric Readiness Project, surveyed EDs nationwide for availability of pediatric-specific equipment, personnel, and processes, and created a weighted score for pediatric readiness. A score of 100 indicates that essential requirements are met for pediatric readiness. A prior study showed that the median score nationally is 68.9 (JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:527-34). In this volume of The Journal, Ray et al address the issue of geographic accessibility to emergency care for children. The authors examined the percentage of children living within 30 minutes of a pediatric-ready ED as defined by the National Pediatric Readiness Project. The results are striking—while 93.7% live within 30 minutes of any ED, only one-third live within 30 minutes of an ED scoring 100, and a little over one-half live within 30 minutes of those scoring in the 90th percentile of readiness; 70% live within an ED scoring within the 75th percentile. The policy implications are clear—the gaps were not in availability of an ED, but in lack of EDs with high pediatric readiness. This means that children presenting to those EDs may not have access to age-appropriate equipment, personnel, or processes, a concern for both families and providers. Fortunately there are already programs aimed at improving pediatric readiness, such as the quality improvement efforts of the Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) program (https://emscimprovement.center/). When considering the well-being of our children, this sort of geographical analysis may permit focused, effective investment, and improved outcomes. Article page 225 ▶ Access to High Pediatric-Readiness Emergency Care in the United StatesThe Journal of PediatricsVol. 194PreviewTo determine the geographic accessibility of emergency departments (EDs) with high pediatric readiness by assessing the percentage of US children living within a 30-minute drive time of an ED with high pediatric readiness, as defined by collaboratively developed published guidelines. Full-Text PDF

Novel Approach to Emergency Departments' Pediatric Readiness Across a Health System.

A gap analysis of emergency departments' (EDs') pediatric readiness across a health system was performed after the appointment of a service line health system pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) quality director. A 55-question survey was completed by each eligible ED to generate a weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS). The survey included questions regarding volume, ED configuration, presence of a pediatric emergency care coordinator (PECC), quality initiatives, policies and procedures, and equipment. Surveys were completed from June 1 to November 12, 2016.Analysis of variance was used to compare the 4 groups of EDs based upon their annual pediatric volume as a continuous measure (low, <1800 visits; medium, 1800-4999 visits; medium-high, 5000-9999 visits; high, >10,000 visits). The Fisher exact test was used to compare the 4 groups for the remaining categorical variables represented as frequencies and percentages. A result was considered statistically significant at the P < 0.05 level of significance. There were a total of 16 hospitals (after the exclusion of the children's hospital, the hub for pediatric care in the health system, and 1 adult-only hospital) with the following pediatric capability: 7 basic (no inpatient pediatrics), 7 general (inpatient pediatrics, with/without a neonatal intensive care unit), and 2 comprehensive (inpatient pediatrics, pediatric intensive care unit, and a neonatal intensive care unit). In 12 EDs, adults and children are treated in the same space. These EDs see a total of 800,000 annual visits including 120,000 pediatric visits. Two low pediatric volume EDs had a median WPRS of 69, range of 62 to 76 (national median, 61.4); 6 medium pediatric volume EDs had a median WPRS of 51, range of 42 to 81 (national median, 69.3); 4 medium-high pediatric volume EDs had a median WPRS of 69.3, range of 45 to 98 (national medium, 74.8); 4 high pediatric volume EDs had a WPRS score of 84.5, range of 58 to 100 (national medium, 89.8). There were 4 sites with PECCs: 1 medium-high volume and 3 high volume, with a median WPRS of 98.5, range of 81 to 100 (national medium, 89.8). Two low-volume EDs have Neonatal Resuscitation Program training for nurses (P < 0.0083). One medium-high volume ED requires specific pediatric competency evaluations for advanced level practitioners staffing the ED. Pediatric-specific quality programs are present in the 2 low volume EDs, 3 of the 6 EDs in the medium group, 3 of 4 EDs in the medium-high group, and all 4 high volume hospitals. After the implementation of the health system PEM quality director, all EDs have a doctor and nurse PECC with a median WPRS of 81. In additiona, a committee was formed with the following key stakeholders: PECCs, pediatric nursing educators, pediatric quality, pharmacy, obstetrics, behavioral health, and neonatology. The committee is part of the health system quality program within both pediatrics and emergency medicine and is spearheading the standardization of code carts and medications, dissemination of pediatric clinical guidelines, and the development of a pediatric quality program across the health system. Pediatric emergency care coordinators play an important role in ED readiness to care for pediatric patients. In a large health system, a service line PEM quality director with the support of emergency medicine and pediatrics, a committee with solid frontline ED base, and a diverse array of stakeholders can foster the engagement of all EDs and improve compliance with published guidelines.

Addressing Children's Needs in Disasters: A Regional Pediatric Tabletop Exercise.

Preparing and responding to the needs of children during public health emergencies continues to be challenging. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of a tabletop exercise in initiating pediatric preparedness strategies and assessing the impact of the exercise on participants' understanding of and confidence in their roles during pediatric public health emergencies. A tabletop exercise was developed to simulate a public health emergency scenario involving smallpox in a child, with subsequent spread to multiple states. During the exercise, participants discussed and developed communication, collaboration, and medical countermeasure strategies to enhance pediatric public health preparedness. Exercise evaluation was designed to assess participants' knowledge gained and level of confidence surrounding pediatric public health emergencies. In total, 22 participants identified over 100 communication and collaboration strategies to promote pediatric public health preparedness during the exercise and found that the most beneficial aspect during the exercise was the partnership between pediatricians and public health officials. Participants' knowledge and level of confidence surrounding a pediatric public health emergency increased after the exercise. The tabletop exercise was effective in identifying strategies to improve pediatric public health preparedness as well as enhancing participants' knowledge and confidence surrounding a potential pediatric public health emergency. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:582-586).

Access to High Pediatric-Readiness Emergency Care in the United States

To determine the geographic accessibility of emergency departments (EDs) with high pediatric readiness by assessing the percentage of US children living within a 30-minute drive time of an ED with high pediatric readiness, as defined by collaboratively developed published guidelines. In this cross-sectional analysis, we examined geographic access to an ED with high pediatric readiness among US children. Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) of US hospitals based on the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) survey. A WPRS of 100 indicates that the ED meets the essential guidelines for pediatric readiness. Using estimated drive time from ZIP code centroids, we determined the proportions of US children living within a 30-minute drive time of an ED with a WPRS of 100 (maximum), 94.3 (90th percentile), and 83.6 (75th percentile). Although 93.7% of children could travel to any ED within 30 minutes, only 33.7% of children could travel to an ED with a WPRS of 100, 55.3% could travel to an ED with a WPRS at or above the 90th percentile, and 70.2% could travel to an ED with a WPRS at or above the 75th percentile. Among children within a 30-minute drive of an ED with the maximum WPRS, 90.9% lived closer to at least 1 alternative ED with a WPRS below the maximum. Access varied across census divisions, ranging from 14.9% of children in the East South Center to 56.2% in the Mid-Atlantic for EDs scoring a maximum WPRS. A significant proportion of US children do not have timely access to EDs with high pediatric readiness.

Improving Pediatric Preparedness in Critical Access Hospital Emergency Departments: Impact of a Longitudinal In Situ Simulation Program.

Critical access hospitals (CAH) see few pediatric patients. Many of these hospitals do not have access to physicians with pediatric training. We sought to evaluate the impact of an in situ pediatric simulation program in the CAH emergency department setting on care team performance during resuscitation scenarios. Five CAHs conducted 6 high-fidelity pediatric simulations over a 12-month period. Team performance was evaluated using a validated 35-item checklist representing commonly expected resuscitation team interventions. Checklists were scored by assigning zero point for "yes" and 1 point for "no". A lower final score meant more items on the list had been completed. The Kruskal-Wallis rank test was used to assess for differences in average scores among institutions. A linear mixed effects model with a random institution intercept was used to examine trends in average scores over time. P < 0.05 was considered significant. The Kruskal-Wallis rank test showed no difference in average scores among institutions. (P = 0.90). Checklist scores showed a significant downward trend over time, with a scenario-to-scenario decrease of 0.022 (P < 0.01). One hundred percent of providers surveyed in the last month stated they would benefit from ongoing scenarios. Regularly scheduled pediatric simulations in the CAH emergency department setting improved team performance over time on expected resuscitation tasks. The program was accepted by providers. Implementation of simulation-based training programs can help address concerns regarding pediatric preparedness in the CAH setting. A future project will look at the impact of the program on patient care and safety.