Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Articles

Delphi Process for Validation of Fluid Treatment Algorithm for Critically Ill Pediatric Trauma Patients

IntroductionWhile intravenous fluid therapy is essential to re-establishing volume status in children who have experienced trauma, aggressive resuscitation can lead to various complications. There remains a lack of consensus on whether pediatric trauma patients will benefit from a liberal or restrictive crystalloid resuscitation approach and how to optimally identify and transition between fluid phases. MethodsA panel was comprised of physicians with expertise in pediatric trauma, critical care, and emergency medicine. A three-round Delphi process was conducted via an online survey, with each round being followed by a live video conference. Experts agreed or disagreed with each aspect of the proposed fluid management algorithm on a five-level Likert scale. The group opinion level defined an algorithm parameter's acceptance or rejection with greater than 75% agreement resulting in acceptance and greater than 50% disagreement resulting in rejection. The remaining were discussed and re-presented in the next round. ResultsFourteen experts from five Level 1 pediatric trauma centers representing three subspecialties were included. Responses were received from 13/14 participants (93%). In round 1, 64% of the parameters were accepted, while the remaining 36% were discussed and re-presented. In round 2, 90% of the parameters were accepted. Following round 3, there was 100% acceptance by all the experts on the revised and final version of the algorithm. ConclusionsWe present a validated algorithm for intavenous fluid management in pediatric trauma patients that focuses on the de-escalation of fluids. Focusing on this time point of fluid therapy will help minimize iatrogenic complications of crystalloid fluids within this patient population.

Review of pediatric emergency care and the COVID-19 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed new challenges in health care delivery for patients of all ages. These included inadequate personal protective equipment, workforce shortages, and unknowns related to a novel virus. Children have been uniquely impacted by COVID-19, both from the system of care and socially. In the initial surges of COVID-19, a decrease in pediatric emergency department (ED) volume and a concomitant increase in critically ill adult patients resulted in re-deployment of pediatric workforce to care for adult patients. Later in the pandemic, a surge in the number of critically ill children was attributed to multisystem inflammatory syndromein children. This was an unexpected complication of COVID-19 and further challenged the health care system. This article reviews the impact of COVID-19 on the entire pediatric emergency care continuum, factors affecting ED care of children with COVID-19 infection, including availability of vaccines and therapeutics approved for children, and pediatric emergency medicine workforce innovations and/or strategies. Furthermore, it provides guidance to emergency preparedness for optimal delivery of care in future health-related crises.

Gaps in pediatric emergency medicine education of emergency medicine residents: A needs assessment of recent graduates.

More than 90% of pediatric patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the United States are evaluated and treated in community-based EDs. Recent evidence suggests that mortality outcomes may be worse for critically ill pediatric patients treated at community EDs. The disparate mortality outcomes may be due to inconsistency in pediatric-specific education provided to emergency medicine (EM) trainees during residency training. There are few studies surveying recently graduated EM physicians assessing perceived gaps in the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) education they received during residency. This was a prospective, survey-based, descriptive cohort study of EM residency graduates from 10 institutions across the United States who were <5 years out from residency training. Deidentified surveys were distributed via email. A total of 222 responses were obtained from 570 eligible participants (39.1%). Non-ED pediatric rotations during residency training included pediatric intensive care (60%), pediatric anesthesia (32.4%), neonatal intensive care unit (26.1%), and pediatric wards (17.1%). A large percentage (42.8%) of respondents felt uncomfortable managing neonates and performing tube thoracostomy on pediatric patients (56.3%). The EM graduate's satisfaction with pediatric simulation-based training during residency was positively associated with comfort caring for neonates and infants (p < 0.0070 and p < 0.0002) and performing endotracheal intubation (p < 0.0027), lumbar puncture (p < 0.0004), and Pediatric Advanced Life Support resuscitation (p < 0.0001). This survey-based cohort study found considerable variation in pediatric-specific experiences during EM residency training and in perceived comfort managing pediatric patients. In general, participants were more comfortable managing older children. This study suggests that the greatest perceived knowledge gaps in PEM were neonatal medicine/resuscitation and pediatric cardiac arrest. Future research will continue to address larger cohorts, representative of the PEM education provided to EM physicians in the United States to promote future educational initiatives.

Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease and Clinicians on Improving Transition Readiness and a Videogame Intervention

Background Adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease (AYA-SCD) have higher rates of mortality and the highest rates of healthcare utilization compared with older and younger SCD patients. The transition period between pediatric and adult care for AYA-SCD is well recognized as a critical window because it represents the intersection of normal adolescent development, change in healthcare access and increased clinical manifestations of disease. Interventions that support AYA-SCD during this time are crucial to improving outcomes. Hallmarks of transition readiness amongst AYA-SCD include self-efficacy (i.e., patients' ability to manage their disease), active participation in shared decision-making (SDM), and adequate disease specific knowledge. Although videogames have been shown to positively affect adolescents' behavior and health outcomes, there has been no study evaluating this technology for improving transition readiness in AYA-SCD. Our objective was to learn AYA-SCD patients' and clinicians' experiences with AYA-SCD managing their disease at home and making medical decisions as they transition from pediatric to adult care, including whether a videogame intervention can positively impact these skills. Methods We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled patients (AYA-SCD ages 15 to 26 with any genotype of SCD) and clinicians who provide care or support to AYA-SCD (pediatric and adult hematology providers, pediatric and general emergency medicine physicians and nurses, child life specialists) at an urban, quaternary care hospital. Interviews elicited patients' and clinicians' experiences with AYA-SCD in the clinic, emergency department, and/or hospital, including the transition from pediatric to adult care, barriers and facilitators to successful home management, and their perspectives on SDM and a videogame intervention. To identify themes related to patients' and clinicians' experiences with AYA-SCD managing their disease at home and making medical decisions, we conducted an inductive analysis following the principles of grounded theory until data saturation was reached for both groups. For patients' and clinicians' perspectives on a videogame intervention, we used a deductive analysis. Three investigators independently coded all transcripts to identify themes, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Results We interviewed 16 patients and 21 clinicians. Participants identified two main themes: 1) self-efficacy to manage their disease successfully as they transition from pediatric to adult care, and 2) the importance of patient engagement in making medical decisions (Table 1; representative quotations). Sub-themes were environmental, clinician, and patient factors that served as barriers and facilitators to achieving self-efficacy and patient engagement in decision-making. Facilitators including having social support, the importance of education about SCD and SDM before adolescence, clinicians having good communication, building trust, listening, and involving patients in medical decisions, and patient self-advocacy by voicing their needs and being empowered to actively participate in medical decisions. Barriers included lack of support and resources, adolescent behaviors/traits, co-dependency on a parent/caregiver, pediatric vs. adult culture, and stigma/implicit bias/provider judgement (Figure 1; conceptual model). Participants were supportive of a videogame intervention to improve self-efficacy and engagement in decision-making (Table 1), with the primary goal being education and insight into SCD, and the secondary goal being distraction during pain crises. Conclusions AYA-SCD patients and their clinicians identified self-efficacy in successful disease management and patient engagement in medical decision-making as two primary areas of importance in the transition from pediatric to adult care. Several barriers and facilitators to achieving self-efficacy and patient engagement are potential targets for interventions to improve these skills in AYA-SCD. Overall, patients and clinicians supported the concept of a videogame to support self-efficacy and patient engagement to improve transition readiness. Future studies will focus on the design, development, and implementation of a videogame intervention which centers the key themes identified in this study.

Brain Point of Care Ultrasound in Young Children Receiving Computed Tomography in the Emergency Department: A Proof of Concept Study

Background: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is an important tool in pediatric emergency medicine. In neonatal intensive care medicine ultrasound is often used to evaluate the brains of sick neonates. In theory, POCUS could be used in the ED in young children to evaluate the brain for abnormal pathology. Objectives: To examine the ability of PEM faculty to use brain POCUS to identify clinically significant brain injuries in children with head injuries and/or abnormal neurological exams, and generate sensitivity and specificity of brain POCUS in assessing such findings. Methods: This study used a convenience sample of patients seen in a tertiary care pediatric centre who required a CT head. A team of physicians who were trained at a workshop for brain POCUS were on call to perform the POCUS while being blinded to the results of the CT. Results: 21 children were enrolled in the study. Five (24%) of the patients had a CT that was positive for intracranial bleeds. Of the 5 patients with a positive CT, 3 had a brain POCUS scan that was also positive. The two false negative brain POCUS scans were on patients with small bleeds (no surgical intervention required) on CT, as reported by radiology. The sensitivity of brain POCUS was 60% (CI 15% - 95%) with a specificity of 94% (CI 70%-100%). The diagnostic accuracy of brain POCUS was 86% (CI 64% - 97%). Conclusion: This small proof of concept study shows that brain POCUS is an imaging modality with reasonable sensitivity and specificity in identifying intracranial pathologies that are present on CT. Its use may be most beneficial to expedite definitive imaging and subspeciality involvement.

Exploring cultural sensitivity during distance simulations in pediatric emergency medicine.

Cultural sensitivity (CS) training is vital to pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) curricula. This study aimed to explore CS in Yale PEM fellows and emergency medicine (EM) residents at Indus Hospital and Health Network (IHHN) in Pakistan through distance simulation activities. This mixed-methods analysis of an educational intervention was conducted at Yale University in collaboration with IHHN. We approached seven U.S. PEM fellows and 22 Pakistani EM residents. We performed a baseline CS assessment using the Clinical Cultural Competency Questionnaire (CCCQ). Afterward, the U.S. PEM fellows facilitated the Pakistani EM residents through six distance simulation sessions. Qualitative data were collected through online focus groups. The CCCQ was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and content analysis was used to analyze the data from the focus groups. Seven U.S. PEM fellows and 18 of 22 Pakistani EM residents responded to the CCCQ at the beginning of the module. The mean (±SD) CCCQ domain scores for the U.S. PEM fellows versus the Pakistani EM residents were 2.56 (±0.37) versus 2.87 (±0.72) for knowledge, 3.02 (±0.41) versus 3.33 (±0.71) for skill, 2.86 (±0.32) versus 3.17 (±0.73) for encounter/situation, and 3.80 (±0.30) versus 3.47 (±0.47) for attitude (each out of 5 points). Our qualitative data analysis showed that intercultural interactions were valuable. There is a common language of medicine among the U.S. PEM fellows and Pakistani EM residents. The data also highlighted a power distance between the facilitators and learners, as the United States was seen as the standard of "how to practice PEM." The challenges identified were time differences, cultural practices such as prayer times, the internet, and technology. The use of local language during debriefing was perceived to enhance engagement. The distance simulation involving U.S. PEM fellows and Pakistani EM residents was an effective approach in assessing various aspects of intercultural education, such as language barriers, technical challenges, and religious considerations.

Race, Ethnicity, Language, and the Treatment of Low-Risk Febrile Infants

Febrile infants at low risk of invasive bacterial infections are unlikely to benefit from lumbar puncture, antibiotics, or hospitalization, yet these are commonly performed. It is not known if there are differences in management by race, ethnicity, or language. To investigate associations between race, ethnicity, and language and additional interventions (lumbar puncture, empirical antibiotics, and hospitalization) in well-appearing febrile infants at low risk of invasive bacterial infection. This was a multicenter retrospective cross-sectional analysis of infants receiving emergency department care between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to July 2023. Pediatric emergency departments were determined through the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee. Well-appearing febrile infants aged 29 to 60 days at low risk of invasive bacterial infection based on blood and urine testing were included. Data were available for 9847 infants, and 4042 were included following exclusions for ill appearance, medical history, and diagnosis of a focal infectious source. Infant race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, and other race or ethnicity) and language used for medical care (English and language other than English). The primary outcome was receipt of at least 1 of lumbar puncture, empirical antibiotics, or hospitalization. We performed bivariate and multivariable logistic regression with sum contrasts for comparisons. Individual components were assessed as secondary outcomes. Across 34 sites, 4042 infants (median [IQR] age, 45 [38-53] days; 1561 [44.4% of the 3516 without missing sex] female; 612 [15.1%] non-Hispanic Black, 1054 [26.1%] Hispanic, 1741 [43.1%] non-Hispanic White, and 352 [9.1%] other race or ethnicity; 3555 [88.0%] English and 463 [12.0%] language other than English) met inclusion criteria. The primary outcome occurred in 969 infants (24%). Race and ethnicity were not associated with the primary composite outcome. Compared to the grand mean, infants of families that use a language other than English had higher odds of the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). In secondary analyses, Hispanic infants, compared to the grand mean, had lower odds of hospital admission (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93). Compared to the grand mean, infants of families that use a language other than English had higher odds of hospital admission (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.08-1.46). Among low-risk febrile infants, language used for medical care was associated with the use of at least 1 nonindicated intervention, but race and ethnicity were not. Secondary analyses highlight the complex intersectionality of race, ethnicity, language, and health inequity. As inequitable care may be influenced by communication barriers, new guidelines that emphasize patient-centered communication may create disparities if not implemented with specific attention to equity.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Training for Bedside Teaching: A National Survey of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows and Program Directors

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Training for Bedside Teaching: A National Survey of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows and Program Directors

A22The use of simulation in paediatric emergency medicine: a scoping review

The use of simulation in healthcare has increased in recent years. It is frequently used for replicating clinical scenarios and allows for the acquisition of skills in a safe environment. Whilst enabling candidates to make mistakes and learn from them without fear of harming patients is used across many specialities including paediatric emergency medicine for a range of teaching across all professional groups, Lateef [1] identifies that in order for it to reach its maximum potential, it needs to be integrated in traditional training programmes. This is becoming more commonplace. In order to know how to fully integrate it into practice, an understanding of how it is currently being used is essential. This scoping view aims to explore how simulation training is being used and what it is used for within paediatric emergency medicine (PEM), as reported by the literature. This review followed a five-step scoping review framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley [2]. Literature searches were conducted in Medline and CINAHL with no limitation applied. Sixty-six studies were screened. Reference lists were also screened. Of the screened studies, 25 were subject to full test review and 19 were included in the final review. Articles were screened at all levels by one reviewer. Data extraction was also carried out by one reviewer. No papers focused on the delivery of simulation within paediatric emergency medicine in the UK, with the majority of papers originating from the USA. There was also no paper that outlined the varied uses of simulation in PEM. Many of the papers described and evaluated single scenarios that were used in varying settings or simulation courses that were not specific to PEM. Both high and low fidelity simulations were reported with much of the focus on high-fidelity simulation. Delivered through either simulation suite-based learning or This scoping review reveals that the extent to which simulation is used within PEM is largely unknown and requires further investigation. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

Characteristics of children hospitalized through the pediatric emergency department and effects of pediatric emergency ward hospitalization

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of the pediatric emergency ward (PEW) through the outcomes of children hospitalized to the ward by the department of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM).Methods: A chart review was completed for children (&lt; 15 years) who were hospitalized to the PEW via the pediatric emergency center from March through May 2021. We compared the general characteristics and details regarding the outcomes depending on the departments they were hospitalized to, namely PEM, pediatrics (PED), and others.Results: We analyzed a total of 606 hospitalized children: PEM, 91; PED, 456; and others, 59. In the order listed above, their median ages were 2 years (interquartile range, 1-6), 1 year (0-4), and 9 years (7-14) (P &lt; 0.001). The numbers of children with Korean Triage and Acuity Scale of 1-3 were 71 (78.0%), 400 (87.7%), and 33 (55.9%) (P &lt; 0.001). Median length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department (ED) and hospital tended to be shorter in PEM (ED LOS: PEM, 4.3 hours vs. PED and others, 4.0-6.3 hours; hospital LOS: PEM, 19.0 hours vs. PED and others, 58.5-63.8 hours; all Ps &lt; 0.001). The differences in the LOS were prominent between others and PEM (ED LOS, 1.538 [95% confidence interval, 1.353-1.749]; hospital LOS, 3.375 [2.741-4.157]). Transfers to other departments occurred only in PEM (4.4%) and PED (3.9%) whereas intensive care was performed only in others (27.1%). Return visits showed no difference among the 3 departments. Top 5 chief complaints and primary diagnoses of the children hospitalized to PEM were vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, head injury, and poisoning, and gastroenteritis, concussion, syncope, poisoning, and upper respiratory infection, respectively.Conclusion: Hospitalization to PEWs for short-term treatment or observation may relieve overcrowding in EDs or in hospitals, with comparable frequency of return visits.

Intranasal drug delivery in pediatric emergency departments: brief review and future outlook

This review aims to provide an overview and update of current literature on the use of intranasal (IN) drug delivery in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM), in terms of the anatomy, physiology, pharmacokinetics, limitations, drug delivery methods, necessary training, safety, contraindications, effectiveness, current indications and trends, and implications for clinical practice and future developments in IN drug administration. We evaluate how IN medication use in PEM has recently evolved, what recent research has revealed about the utility of IN drug delivery in PEM, and what the future of IN drug delivery might look like.

Gender Differences in Work-Life Integration, Career Satisfaction, and Burnout in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Women physicians report worse work-life integration, career satisfaction, and burnout than men. No studies have evaluated work-life integration and career satisfaction in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) or explored gender differences for these outcomes. This study aims to (1) compare work-life integration, career satisfaction, and burnout in women and men PEM physicians and (2) compare associated individual and occupational factors to distinguish modifiable factors. We distributed an electronic survey to assess well-being parameters in PEM physicians. We assessed career satisfaction and work-life integration with single-item measures. We used a 2-item screen to measure burnout. We performed descriptive analyses, univariate analysis to compare gender differences, and multivariate logistic regression analysis for each outcome. Two hundred thirty-nine PEM physicians participated, yielding a response rate of 50% (57% women; age range, 30-80 years). Overall satisfaction with work-life integration was 42.9%, with 34.3% of women reporting appropriate work-life integration, compared with 55.4% of men ( P = 0.001). Career satisfaction rate was 77.8%, with 71.6% of women reporting career satisfaction, compared with 86.1% of men ( P = 0.008). Burnout rate was 44.5%, with 53.7% of women reporting burnout compared with 33.7% of men ( P = 0.002). Modifiable factors identified include perception of unfair compensation, inadequate physical and mental health support provided by organization, feeling unappreciated, inadequate provider staffing, inadequate resources for patient care, lack of advance notice or control of work schedule, and inadequate sleep. Of PEM physicians, women have worse work-life integration, less career satisfaction, and more burnout than men. The PEM community should devote resources to modifiable occupational factors to improve gender disparities in well-being parameters.

Emergency departments: An underutilized resource to address pediatric influenza vaccine coverage

BackgroundEmergency department (ED) based influenza vaccine (IV) programs have been successful in adults; however, little is known about pediatric ED IV programs in terms of prevalence, feasibility, or successful implementation. AimsTo describe the reach and effectiveness of IV practices in pediatric EDs, and identify IV facilitators and barriers. MethodsWe assessed, via cross-sectional survey of pediatric ED physicians, number of EDs offering IV to children, vaccines administered annually, and perceived facilitators/barriers to vaccination. The proportion of EDs offering IV is reported. Chi-square tests compared facilitators and barriers among high performers (≥50 IV/year), low performers (<50 IV/yr), and non-vaccinators. We calculated an area of missed effect for the number of children who could be vaccinated if non-vaccinating EDs offered IV. ResultsAmong 492 physicians from 166 EDs, 142 responded (representing 61 (37.3 %) EDs). Most EDs were in large, urban, academic, freestanding children’s hospitals (Table 1). Only twenty-six EDs (44.3 %) offer ≥ 1 IV/yr. Seventeen (65.4 %) were low performers, five (19.2 %) high performers, and four (15.4 %) were model programs. High/model performers used establish workflows more commonly than lower performers (78 % vs. 33 %), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.077). Common facilitators included: strong provider and administration buy-in, electronic health record facilitation, storage/accessibility, and having a leadership team/champion (Fig. 1). Non-vaccinators commonly perceived lack of these factors as barriers. Many (24/61, 39.3 %) EDs expressed interested in establishing or growing IV programs. Up to 18,250 unvaccinated children could receive IV annually if non-vaccinating EDs offered IV during influenza season. ConclusionsOver half of EDs participating in the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee do not currently offer pediatric IV. Addressing identified barriers/facilitators to develop IV programs in EDs has potential to improve vaccination rates, especially among minority and underserved children.

SIMPEDVR: using VR in teaching pediatric emergencies to undergraduate students—a pilot study

The objective of this work was to provide pilot data on feasibility of using virtual reality (VR) to train undergraduate students in pediatric emergency scenarios. We staged VR sessions for a total of 45 medical and nursing students; in every session, each student managed two pediatric emergency virtual scenarios. At the end of the sessions, students completed a Technology Assessment Questionnaire to evaluate the perceived usefulness and perceived ease-of-use of their VR training experience and rated their perceived level of competence in managing the two clinical scenarios. The median perceived usefulness was 91.7/100 (interquartile range (IQR) 80.6–100), while the median perceived ease-of-use was 77.8/100 (IQR 63.9–88.9). The perceived level of competence increased from 2 (IQR 1–3) to 4 (IQR 3–4) on a 5-point Likert scale, for both scenarios (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test for paired samples). Conclusions: The staged VR sessions had a good perceived usefulness and resulted in an increase in the perceived level of competence. The results on the ease-of-use, however, show that an assumption that millennials and younger students can navigate with confidence VR hardware in a healthcare training setting should not be made; further work is required to ease the integration of VR into curricula.What is Known:• Virtual reality (VR) is a rising simulation training methodology in Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM), however little experience is reported about its use for undergraduate studentsWhat is New:• VR PEM trainiing was found useful by undergraduate students and its use increased their perceived level of competence, although ease-of-use received lower ratings.• Despite the young age, an assumption that millennials and younger students can navigate with confidence VR hardware in a healthcare training setting should not be made

Delays in treatment and disposition attributable to undertriage of pediatric emergency medicine patients

BackgroundTriage, the initial assessment and sorting of patients in the Emergency Department (ED), determines priority of evaluation and treatment. Little is known about the impact of undertriage, the underestimation of disease severity at triage, on clinical care in pediatric ED patients. We evaluate the impact of undertriage on time to disposition and treatment decisions in pediatric ED patients. MethodsThis was a case control study of ED visits for patients <22 years of age, with an assigned Emergency Severity Index (ESI) score of 4 or 5, and associated hospital admission, nebulized treatment, supplemental oxygen, and/or intravenous (IV) line placement, between January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022. Controls were sampled from a pool of patient visits with an ESI score of 3, matched by intervention, disposition, and date and hour of arrival.Primary outcome measures were time to order of intervention (nebulized treatment, oxygen administration, or IV placement) and time to disposition decision. A secondary outcome measure was return visits requiring admission or emergency intervention within 14 days of the index visit. Continuous variables (time to orders) were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test and dichotomous outcomes (return visits) were compared using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Analysis was performed with Python v3.10. ResultsThe final analysis included 7245 undertriaged patients. Undertriaged patients had longer times to orders for nebulized treatments, (p < 0.001) IV placement, (p < 0.001) and admission (p < 0.001) when compared to controls. There were no significant differences in time to supplemental oxygen delivery and time to discharge compared to controls. Undertriaged patients were more likely to experience a return visit requiring admission or emergency intervention (OR 3.74, 95% CI 3.32,4.22). ConclusionsUndertriage in the pediatric ED is associated with delays in care and disposition decisions and increases likelihood of return visits.

Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.

Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.

Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Use for Detection of Multiple Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Case Report.

Point-of-care ultrasound, pediatric emergency medicine, foreign body ingestion.

Test Characteristics of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Children With Preexisting Cardiac Conditions.

The aim of the study is to assess diagnostic performance of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians in children with preexisting cardiac disease. We evaluated the use of cardiac POCUS performed by PEM physicians among a convenience sample of children with preexisting cardiac disease presenting to a tertiary care pediatric ED. We assessed patient characteristics and the indication for POCUS. The test characteristics of the sonologist interpretation for the assessment of both pericardial effusion as well as left ventricular systolic dysfunction were compared with expert POCUS review by PEM physicians with POCUS fellowship training. A total of 104 children with preexisting cardiac disease underwent cardiac POCUS examinations between July 2015 and December 2017. Among children with preexisting cardiac disease, structural defects were present in 72%, acquired conditions in 22%, and arrhythmias in 13% of patients. Cardiac POCUS was most frequently obtained because of chest pain (55%), dyspnea (18%), tachycardia (17%), and syncope (10%). Cardiac POCUS interpretation compared with expert review had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.7-100) for pericardial effusion and 100% (95% CI, 71.5-100) for left ventricular systolic dysfunction; specificity was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.3.1-99.7) for pericardial effusion and 98.9% (95% CI, 93.8-99.8) for left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Cardiac POCUS demonstrates good sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing pericardial effusion and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in children with preexisting cardiac conditions when technically adequate studies are obtained. These findings support future studies of cardiac POCUS in children with preexisting cardiac conditions presenting to the ED.

Virtual Coaching and the Reduction of Radial Head Subluxation: A Case Series.

After the establishment of the virtual pediatric emergency medicine clinic at our institution, we noted that several physicians independently began to instruct caregivers virtually on reducing a radial head subluxation. We thus conducted a case series to investigate the number, success, and follow-ups for the virtual reduction of radial head subluxation. The electronic medical records at our institution were searched from the inception of the virtual clinic in May 2020 until August 2022 (inclusive), for visits and discharge diagnosis containing the word "elbow" or "arm." Fourteen charts were retrieved; however, 2 were excluded because they were not a suspected radial head subluxation. A virtual reduction was attempted for eight (66.7%) of the 12 patients. In 6 of 8 patients (75.0%), the reduction was deemed successful, and for 2 patients (25.0%), it was deemed unsuccessful. Of the latter, one was found to have a nondisplaced radial neck fracture. All 4 patients (33.3%) for whom a virtual reduction was not attempted were referred to the emergency department. Virtual video coaching of pulled elbow reduction was completed at our institution with overall good success rate. All the physicians involved noted the essential need and benefits of video conferencing for successfully reducing radial head subluxation. We note that a pediatric population may be more amenable to video-based appointments than other populations due to their caregivers' familiarity with digital technology. Finally, as nonphysician models of healthcare delivery for virtual urgent care visits expand, we propose a checklist based on our experience to ensure patient safety.

Impact of Using a Precompleted Consent Form for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

This study aimed to compare elements discussed during the consent process for procedural sedation in the pediatric emergency department to documentation and parental recall before and after implementation of a standardized consent form. This is a mixed-methods study combining retrospective electronic record review and cross-sectional surveys of providers and parents after consent for procedural sedation. Surveys were obtained before and after implementation of a precompleted consent form. Providers' survey responses were compared with consent documentation. Recall of consent elements discussed by linked parent-provider dyads were compared. Six hundred fifty-five encounters were reviewed. Pediatric emergency medicine fellows and pediatric emergency department-based pediatricians were more likely to document any benefit (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.4) or alternative (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.8-3.9) compared with PEM attendings. Providers were more likely to report discussion of failure to complete the procedure (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.3-23.3) and parents were more likely to recall discussion of this risk (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.0-27.8) in the postintervention group. Based on provider recall, using the precompleted consent form was associated with providers discussing at least 2 of the 3 benefits (84.0% vs 97.2%, P < 0.01), 5 of the 5 risks (31% vs 67.7%, P < 0.01), and improved parental recall of risks (5.7% vs 22.9%, P = 0.03). More providers reported taking less than 1 minute to complete the form in the postimplementation group (12.0% vs 43.7%, P < 0.01). Implementing a precompleted consent form for procedural sedation was associated with providers reporting decreased time spent completing the consent form and better alignment of key consent elements between reported provider discussion and parental recall.