Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes after Additional Dynamic Renal® Stent Implantation for Stent Recoil in Ostial Coronary Lesions.

Background: Interventional treatment of aorto-ostial coronary stenoses is limited by stent recoil and suboptimal angiographic results, leading to restenosis and frequent re-interventions. As a potential bail-out strategy for stent recoil, implantation of an additional stent to increase radial force has been reported. Thus, we sought to investigate clinical outcomes after additional implantation of a Dynamic Renal® stent (DRS), a non-coronary; bare-metal stent with very high radial force, in aorto-ostial coronary stenoses. Methods: Patients treated by implantation of DRSs for stent recoil in the ostial right coronary artery or the left main stem were identified from the hospital database. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were compared to patients who underwent re-intervention for in-stent-restenosis in similar segments by either implantation of conventional drug-eluting stents (DES) or paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB). Clinical follow-ups were performed up to three years following re-intervention with the assessment of death, target lesion reintervention (TLR), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as a combination death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed for event-free survival between the three groups. Results: Between 05/2013 and 07/2019, 28 patients underwent DRS implantation of aorto-ostial coronary lesions. In comparison with 49 patients with DES implantation and 29 patients undergoing PCB treatment, no relevant differences in baseline parameters were identified. Median follow-up was 714 days, with an available follow-up of >1 year after intervention in 82.1% of patients. In the entire study cohort at two years after re-intervention, the TLR rate was 16% (17 patients), the MACE rate 37% (39 patients), and all-cause mortality 9% (10 patients), with no significant differences between the three groups. Conclusions: DRS implantation for treating stent recoil of aorto-ostial coronary lesions resulted in a high rate of TLR, and was associated with similar risk for death and MACE compared to treatment of in-stent-restenosis with DES or PCB. Randomized, larger comparisons of contemporary DES in patients exclusively presenting with stent recoil are necessary to further define the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence for market access and surveillance of high-risk products—The example of paclitaxel

AbstractIn 2018 and 2020, two meta-analyses using summary-level data from randomized controlled trials reported worse mortality following the application of paclitaxel-coated stents and balloons in femoropopliteal and crural arteries. These results initiated a heated global discussion concerning the validity of this association, while various observational studies using clinical and administrative registries proved the safety of coated devices. This article aimed to summarize the development and adoption of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents for the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in clinical practice, research, and practice guidelines. It especially focusses on the European Unionʼs medical device regulation, which has far-reaching implications for the market approval and monitoring of high-risk medical devices.

Randomized Controlled Trial for Paclitaxel-coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Vascular Access: 12-month Outcome from a Nonsponsored Trial

Plain balloon angioplasty is regarded as the mainstay of treatment for failing vascular access with high success rate, but the poor treatment durability creates significant workload and increases patient morbidity. The study aims to compare target lesion primary patency rate at 12 months between paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for treatment of dysfunctional vascular access. This nonsponsored-randomized trial enrolled 40 patients with dysfunctional dialysis access at a single center. Patients were randomized into In.Pact Admiral Paclitaxel DCB or POBA after lesion crossing regardless of lesion type. Patients are followed up under surveillance protocol. Patients, hemodialysis staff, and sonographer are blinded to the treatment arms. Twelve-month primary patency rate in both arms are evaluated. 40 patients were recruited since June 2016 and were allocated to the DCB or POBA group. The mean age is 58 and 57 years with comparable demographic parameters. The locations of target lesion were comparable in both groups (juxta and arteriovenous anastomosis, cannulation site, and fistula/graft), with similar mean target lesion stenosis 69.8 +/- 15.8% for DCB and 69.5 +/- 13.6% for POBA (P=0.95), and the lesion length for DCB is 45.8 +/- 38.4mm and 50.2 +/- 33.5mm for POBA (P=0.70). Patients in DCB performed significantly better in terms of primary patency at 6 months 85% versus 55% (P=0.007). The superiority in primary patency in DCB group exists at 12 months 65% versus 30% (P=0.007). Paclitaxel balloon angioplasty approach provides significant better primary patency in dysfunctional arteriovenous access at 12months in our nonsponsored-randomized trial.

Safety and efficacy of the treatment of in-stent restenosis and de novo complex lesions with the novel paclitaxel-coated scoring balloon (Angiosculpt X)

Abstract Background The AngioSculpt X (Spectranetics) is a novel paclitaxel-coated scoring balloon with encouraging preliminary data for the treatment of in-stent restenosis or de novo complex lesions. Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of real-world patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) or de novo complex lesions (vessels <2.5 mm, calcified lesions, bifurcation lesions...) treated with the novel paclitaxel-coated scoring balloon. Methods A “real-world”, prospective registry from two centers was performed including consecutive patients presenting with ISR or de novo complex lesions and treated with AngioSculpt X. Their clinical data were prospectively registered. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results Overall, 87 real-world patients and 93 lesions (73% male, 68±10 years, 46% smoker, 83% hypertensive, 62% diabetic, 71% hyperlipidemic, 35% LVEF <60% impairment) were enrolled in the study. Clinical presentation was stable angina in 19%, unstable angina in 33%, NSTEMI in 29% and STEMI in 5%. Radial access account 84%. The median fluoroscopy time was 17 (IQ range 10,0 - 37.5) min. De novo complex lesions were treated in 35% (n=32) while ISR in 63% (n=57), (Prior BMS 19%; Sirolimus DES 9%; Everolimus DES 26%; Biolimus/Anfilimus DES 20%; Zotarolimus DES 26%) with a median time to ISR of 3.6 (IQ range 1.1 - 10.7) years. Total stent length was 28±18 mm, with an overlap spot affected in 18%, and 27% had >1 treatment for ISR. The most frequent artery treated was left anterior descending (41%) followed by left circumflex (35%) and right coronary artery (17%). Quantitative coronary angiography reference diameter of lesions was 2.7±0.5 mm and length 9.0±4.8 mm, with a % stenosis of 75±20. Predilatation/postdilatation was performed in 60/24% respectively. Device diameter was 2.9±0.4 mm and length 13.6±3.9 mm, deployed at 16±3 atmospheres, with an inflation time of 33±16 seconds. The balloon/artery ratio was 0.99±0.03. Crossover was decided on 18 cases (19%) due to remaining intimal flap, but the success rate (residual stenosis <30%) was 100%. Intracoronary imaging technique was performed in 12% (OCT=7, IVUS=4). At 7±6 month follow-up, there were 10 MACE (cardiac death=1, nonfatal myocardial infarction =4, TLR=4 and TVR=1). Conclusions Paclitaxel-coated scoring balloon offers a safe and valuable treatment option for ISR and de novo complex lesions. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Juan Ramόn Jiménez University Hospital

Evaluation of mortality following paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty of femoropopliteal lesions in patients with ulcerations and gangrene - a single center experience.

Background: A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials suggested an increased long-term mortality risk following femoropopliteal angioplasty using paclitaxel coated devices. To assess the long-term mortality after paclitaxel drug-coated (DCB) and uncoated balloon angioplasty (POBA) of femoropopliteal lesions in patients with ulcerations and gangrene in real world practice. Patients and methods: A retrospective mortality analysis of patients with at least 3-year follow-up who underwent balloon based endovascular therapy of femoropopliteal lesions was performed. Results: Overall 624 patients with femoropopliteal lesions were included in this study. Of those, 197 patients were treated with POBA without crossover to a paclitaxel coated device during follow-up and 427 patients with DCB angioplasty. Mean follow-up time was 33.3±25.4 months. Mortality incidence was 81.7% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 76.1-86.8) after POBA and 59.0% (95% CI: 54.6-63.9) after DCB (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed type of treatment (POBA vs. DCB, (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.332, 95% CI: 0.215-0.514, p<0.001), age per year (HR: 1.065, 95% CI: 1.046-1.087, p<0.001), coronary heart disease (HR: 1.969, 95% CI: 1.323-2.930, p=0.001), renal insufficiency (HR: 1.583, 95% CI: 1.079-2.323, p=0.019), stroke (HR: 2.505, 95% CI: 1.431-4.384, p=0.001) as predictors for all-cause mortality. In the subgroup excluding octogenarians, mortality predictors were type of treatment (HR: 0.463, 95% CI: 0.269-0.796, p=0.005), age per year (HR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.002-1.069, p=0.038), coronary heart disease (HR: 2.082, 95% CI: 1.274-3.400, p=0.003), stroke (HR: 2.203, 95% CI: 1.156-4.197, p=0.016) and renal insufficiency (HR: 2.201, 95% CI: 1.357-3.571, p<0.001). Conclusions: This monocentric retrospective analysis showed no survival disadvantage for patients in Rutherford-Becker stage 5 after treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloons.

A Single-Center Study on Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Disease—Efficacy and Mortality

A Single-Center Study on Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Disease—Efficacy and Mortality

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Patients Treated With Paclitaxel-Coated Versus Uncoated Balloons

Paclitaxel (PTX)-coated balloons have been shown to decrease restenosis rates, but their use has been linked to a potential increase in late mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine 4-year outcomes after angioplasty with PTX compared with a matched control group treated without PTX. We retrospectively reviewed 1424 consecutive patients who underwent femoropopliteal artery intervention by angioplasty, atherectomy, stent placement, or combination between 2011 and 2019. Primary outcome measures were survival, amputation-free survival, freedom from major amputation, and freedom from target vessel revascularization (FF-TVR). Groups were divided into patients who received PTX and those who did not. Patients were propensity score matched 1:1 with respect to comorbidities and Rutherford class using a caliper width of 0.001 without replacement. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with log-rank P < .05 considered significant. Multivariable analyses used Cox proportional hazards. There were 1424 patients (PTX, n = 830; non-PTX, n = 594) who were propensity score matched, yielding 529 PTX and 529 non-PTX patients. After matching, all comorbidities were similar (P > .20), including presence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI; 70.3% vs 67.1%; P = .29), diabetes (59.2% vs 58.2%; P = .80), chronic kidney disease (CKD; 36.3% vs 34.6%; P = .61), and smoking (72.4% vs 72.0%; P = .95). Through 4-year follow-up, patients in the PTX group demonstrated superior survival (Fig 1; 62.1% vs 51.8%; P = .04), amputation-free survival (Fig 2; 59.3% vs 46.4%; P = .0003), and freedom from major amputation (Fig 2; 91.3% vs 85.5%; P = .001). FF-TVR showed a benefit for PTX out to 3 years (year 1, 87.0% vs 80.2% [P = .003]; year 2, 81.4% vs 76.4% [P = .01]; year 3, 76.5% vs 74.8% [P = .047]). FF-TVR rates were similar at 4 years (73.6% vs 71.0%; P = .052). Multivariable Cox regression found that age, CLTI, CKD, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were associated with mortality and that age, CLTI, CKD, and smoking history were associated with amputation. In a propensity score-matched analysis, patients treated with PTX achieved greater survival, amputation-free survival, and freedom from major amputation through 4-year follow-up than matched non-PTX patients. In addition, FF-TVR was higher in PTX patients until year 3 and became similar to that of non-PTX patients at year 4.Fig 2Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of freedom from major amputation (FF-Amp, gray lines) and amputation-free survival (AFS, black lines) based on the use of paclitaxel (PTX). SE, Standard error.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Infrainguinal Arteries: 24-Month Outcomes in the Full Cohort of BIOLUX P-III Global Registry

PurposeAfter promising small randomized trials, the aim of BIOLUX P-III was to further investigate the safety and performance of the Passeo-18 lx drug-coated balloon in infrainguinal arteries under real-world conditions.MethodsBIOLUX P-III is a global prospective single-arm study with follow-up at 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAE) within 6 months. The primary performance endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 12 months.Results877 patients/1084 lesions were enrolled. Diabetes mellitus was present in 47.7%, and 42.1% had critical limb ischemia (CLI). The mean lesion length was 89.0 mm with 76.1% of calcified lesions, and 24.9% occluded. At 24 months, freedom from MAE was 83.1% in the full cohort; 84.9% in the femoropopliteal population (592 patients, 691 lesions); 77.7% for long lesions (187 subjects/192 lesions); and 72.5% in the in-stent restenosis (ISR) subgroup (103 subjects/116 lesions). Twenty-four-month freedom from clinically driven TLR was 88.1% in the full cohort; 88.9% in the femoropopliteal population; 80.3% for the long lesions; and 78.4% for ISR. Twenty-four-month all-cause mortality was 12.0% in the full cohort, 10.2% in the femoropopliteal population, 14.8% for the long lesions and 12.0% for ISR. There was no device- or procedure-related death up to 24-month follow-up.ConclusionThe BIOLUX P-III 24-month outcomes confirm the safety and performance of Passeo-18 lx in infrainguinal arteries in a large population treated under real-world conditions with low complication rates and good clinical outcomes (NCT02276313).

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of the MagicTouch Sirolimus-Coated Balloon in Small Vessels: Rationale and Design of the TRANSFORM I Trial

AimsThe objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel Magic Touch sirolimus coated-balloon (SCB) when compared to the SeQuent Please Neo paclitaxel coated balloon (PCB) for the treatment of de-novo small vessel coronary artery diseases (SVD). Study designThe TRANSFORM I study is a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority trial with the intent to enroll a total of 114 patients with a de-novo SVD (≤2.5 mm). Vessel size will be pre-screened by on-line QCA. After successful pre-dilatation without major coronary dissections (type C-F) nor Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial [TIMI] grade flow ≤2, patients will be enrolled in a 1:1 randomization to receive treatment with either the novel SCB balloon or the comparative PCB balloon. The balloon sizing will be selected according to the lumen-based approach derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT). The primary endpoint is 6-month mean net lumen diameter gain (6-month minimum lumen diameter [MLD] minus baseline MLD) assessed by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) with non-inferiority margin of 0.3 mm in per-protocol analysis. The clinical follow-up will be conducted up to 1 year. The enrollment started in September 2020 and will complete in April 2021. ConclusionsThe TRANSFORM I trial will assess the efficacy of novel SCB in terms of non-inferiority to conventional PCB with a novel OCT measurement approach in patients with a de-novo SVD.Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov.Unique identifier: NCT03913832.

Real-World Experience With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Critical Limb Ischemia: 24-Month Subgroup Outcomes of BIOLUX P-III.

The aim of the BIOLUX P-III (A Prospective, International, Multi-Centre, Post-Market All-Comers Registry to Assess the Clinical Performance of the Passeo-18 Lux Paclitaxel Releasing Balloon Catheter in Infrainguinal Arteries - III) registry was to collect real-world data on the Passeo-18 Lux paclitaxel-coated balloon. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a severe condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Prospective data are needed to provide further insights on drug-eluting devices. BIOLUX P-III is a prospective, post-market, all-comers registry assessing the safety and performance of the Passeo-18 Lux. Clinical information was collected at 6, 12, and 24months. The authors report 24-month outcomes of the CLI subgroup with patients in Rutherford classes 4 to6. The CLI subgroup included 328 patients with 422 lesions. Patients were 71.1 ± 10.5 years of age, and 61.0% had diabetes. Femoropopliteal lesions were present in 53.8% (n=227), below-the-knee lesions were present in 27.0% (n=114), and lesions were moderate or heavily calcified in 45.0% (n=190). Major adverse events, defined as 30-day device- or procedure-related mortality, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization, occurred in 9.8% of patients through 6months, in 14.9% through 12months, and in 19.4% through 24months. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization occurred in 4.4%, 8.5%, and 12.1%, major amputation in 4.9%, 5.2%, and 6.1%, and mortality in 8.1%, 11.1%, and 20.1%, respectively. Predictors of mortality were age≥75 years and higher Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease class, and higher Rutherford class was associated with increased mortality and amputation rates. In a large, multimorbid patient population with complex lesions and CLI, the safety and performance of the Passeo-18 Lux paclitaxel-coated balloon has been confirmed, with low rates of major amputation and target lesion revascularization.

Clinical Outcomes Differ After Femoropopliteal Artery Treatment Between Individual Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Clinical Outcomes Differ After Femoropopliteal Artery Treatment Between Individual Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Post-dilatation of an interwoven nitinol stent using a paclitaxel-coated balloon for revascularization of complex femoro-popliteal lesions.

To evaluate technical success, safety and efficacy of post-dilatation of an interwoven nitinol stent using a paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) for revascularization of complex femoro-popliteal lesions. Thirty patients (26 male, mean age 70 ± 7years) suffering from peripheral artery disease (PAD) (Rutherford category II-III) underwent revascularization of chronic total occlusions (n = 22, 73%) or severe stenosis (n = 8, 27%) of the femoro-popliteal segment. Mean lesion length was 251 ± 85mm. Lesions were treated by pre-dilatation (POBA), implantation of a helical interwoven stent and post-dilatation with a PCB. Technical success was defined as residual stenosis < 30%. Follow-up included clinical visits, duplex ultrasound and ABI at 6 and 12months. Endpoints were patency (re-stenosis < 50%), complications, improvement of Rutherford category and ABI. Regarding patency two sub-groups were compared: long-("LL"; < 25cm, n = 12, mean 175 ± 38mm) and ultra-long lesions ("ULL"; ≥ 25cm, n = 13, mean 322 ± 43mm). Technical success was 100%. In 1/30 patients (3.3%), a minor complication occurred (embolism). The overall primary and secondary patency rates at 12months were 80.0% (95% CI 72.5-96.9%) and 92.0% (95% CI 84.7-100%). In the LL-sub-group, primary patency was 100%, and in the ULL-sub-group, primary patency was 61.5% (95% CI 51.8-92.3%) (p = 0.056), and secondary patency 84.6% (95% CI 71.3-100%), respectively. Rutherford category increased by at least one category in 92% of patients, ABI increased from 0.52 ± 0.13 (baseline) to 0.9 ± 0.14 (12months) (p = 0.001). Five patients underwent target lesion revascularization during follow-up (bypass: n = 1, endovascular: n = 4). No death was observed during follow-up. Post-dilatation of an interwoven nitinol stent using a paclitaxel-coated-balloon proved to be safe and effective with promising outcomes in long- and ultra-long lesions up to 12months of follow-up.

Feasibility and Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Intracranial Symptomatic In-Stent Restenosis.

Objective: Symptomatic in-stent restenosis (sISR) is the major cause of medium- or long-term cerebral infarctions in patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for the treatment of intracranial sISR.Methods: We report 11 cases of PCB angioplasty for intracranial sISR. Lesion locations and number were as follows: intracranial internal carotid artery (n = 4), M1 segment of middle cerebral artery (MCA) (n = 1), V4 segment of vertebral artery (n = 6). The technical success rate, periprocedural complications, and short-term outcome were retrospectively analyzed.Results: All procedures were successfully performed without periprocedural complication. Asymptomatic vessel dissection after PCB inflation occurred in one case. Postprocedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) showed new asymptomatic ipsilateral infarction in one case. All 11 cases did not experience ipsilateral stroke or death within 30 days or ischemic stroke in the territory of the target artery between 31 and 90 days after procedure.Conclusion: This preliminary study indicates that PCB angioplasty is feasible and safe for the treatment of intracranial sISR. Further studies are needed to clarify its efficiency and long-term outcome.

Differences in clinical outcomes between pre- and post-marketing clinical study following paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis: from the Japanese regulatory viewpoint.

In 2013, a drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) (SeQuent Please) for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) was approved in Japan. The pre-marketing Japan domestic NP001 study demonstrated better outcomes of the DCB (n = 138) compared to plain balloon angioplasty (n = 72). After the introduction to marketing, a post-marketing surveillance (PMS) (n = 396) was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DCB in Japanese routine clinical practice. The aim of this paper was to assess differences between the pre-marketing NP001 study and the PMS. Compared to the NP001 study, more complex lesions were treated in the PMS (type B2/C: 69.0% vs 20.4%, total occlusion: 11.2% vs 0%, p < 0.001, respectively) and target lesion was more frequently ISR related to drug-eluting stent (DES) (79.5% vs 39.4%, p < 0.001). Regarding clinical outcomes, the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was higher in the PMS than in the NP001 study (TLR: 12.9% at 7months and 17.6% at 12months vs 2.8% at 6months, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that DES-ISR was a risk factor of TLR after DCB treatment for ISR (odds ratio: 5.77, 95% CI 1.75-18.95, p = 0.004). Among representative published trials using DCB for ISR, clinical outcomes are often worse in DES-ISR trials than those in bare metal stent-ISR trials. The rates of TLR in previous DES-ISR trials are similar to that in the current PMS (TLR at 12months: 22.1% for ISAR-DESIRE 3, 15.3% for PEPCAD-DES, and 13.0% for RIBS IV). The effectiveness and safety of DCB for coronary ISR have been confirmed in the Japanese real-world survey. PMS would be useful to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical products throughout their total life cycles.

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents for Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease Interventions: A Regulatory Perspective for the Practicing Clinician

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents for Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease Interventions: A Regulatory Perspective for the Practicing Clinician

10-Year Paclitaxel Dose-Related Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stents Treated Below the Knee in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (The PADI Trial)

PurposeRecently, two meta-analyses concluded that there appears to be an increased risk of long-term mortality of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in the superficial femoral and popliteal artery, and paclitaxel-coated balloons below the knee. In this post hoc study of the PADI Trial, we investigated the long-term safety of first-generation paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting stents (DES) below the knee and the dose–mortality relationships of paclitaxel in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLI).Materials and MethodsThe PADI Trial compared paclitaxel-coated DES with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with bail-out bare-metal stents (PTA ± BMS) in patients with CLI treated below the knee. Follow-up was extended to 10 years after the first inclusion, and survival analyses were performed. In addition, dose-related mortality and dose per patient weight-related mortality relations were examined.ResultsA total of 140 limbs in 137 patients were included in the PADI Trial. Ten years after the first inclusion, 109/137 (79.6%) patients had died. There was no significant difference between mortality in the DES group compared with the PTA ± BMS group (Log-rank p value = 0.12). No specific dose-related mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.00, p = 0.99) or dose per weight mortality (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.93–1.18, p = 0.46) relationships were identified in the Cox-proportional Hazard models or by Kaplan–Meier survival analyses.ConclusionsThere is a poor 10-year survival in both paclitaxel-coated DES and PTA ± BMS in patients with CLI treated below the knee. No dose-related adverse effects of paclitaxel-coated DES were observed in our study of patients with CLI treated below the knee.Level of EvidenceThe PADI Trial: level 1, randomized clinical trial

A drug-coated balloon treatment for urethral stricture disease: Two-year results from the ROBUST I study.

Mechanical balloon dilation and direct visualization internal urethrotomy (DVIU) are the most widely used treatments for urethral stricture disease in the U.S., but recurrence rates are high, especially after re-treatment. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of the Optilume™ paclitaxel-coated balloon for the treatment of recurrent strictures. Men with recurrent bulbar strictures ≤2 cm with 1-4 prior endoscopic treatments were treated with the Optilume™ drug-coated balloon. Patients were evaluated within 14 days, three, six, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The primary safety endpoint was serious urinary adverse events. The primary efficacy endpoint was ≥50% improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, erectile function, flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume. A total of 53 subjects were enrolled and treated; 46 completed the 24-month followup. Forty-three percent of men had undergone >1 previous dilations, with a mean of 1.7 prior dilations. There were no serious adverse events related to treatment at two years. Success was achieved in 32/46 (70%), and baseline IPSS improved from a mean of 25.2 to 6.9 at 24 months (p<0.0001). Quality of life, flow rate, and post-void residual urine volumes improved significantly from baseline. There was no impact on erectile function. Two-year data indicates the Optilume™ paclitaxel-coated balloon is safe for the treatment of recurrent bulbar urethral strictures. Early efficacy results are encouraging and support further followup of these men through five years, as well as further investigation with a randomized trial.

Mortality in patients undergoing revascularization with paclitaxel eluting devices for infrainguinal peripheral artery disease: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

We aimed to evaluate whether paclitaxel eluting devices increased the risk of death in patients undergoing revascularization for infrainguinal peripheral artery disease using network meta-analyses. PUBMED and EMBASE were searched through April 2020 for randomized trials in patients with infrainguinal peripheral artery disease who underwent revascularization with or without a paclitaxel eluting device (balloon/stent). Short-term mortality defined as death at 6-12 months, and long-term mortality defined as death at >12 months after revascularization. Our search identified 57 eligible randomized controlled studies enrolling a total of 9,362 patients comparing seven revascularization strategies (balloon angioplasty vs. bare metal stent vs. covered stent vs. paclitaxel eluting stent vs. other drug eluting stent vs. paclitaxel-coated balloon vs. bypass surgery). Overall, paclitaxel eluting stent and paclitaxel-coated balloons did not increase short-term mortality (eg, vs. balloon angioplasty: paclitaxel-coated balloon OR [95% CI] 1.21 [0.88-1.66], p = .24; paclitaxel eluting stent OR [95%CI] 1.01 [0.63-1.63], p = .97, respectively). In addition, paclitaxel eluting stent did not show significant increase in long-term mortality (eg, vs. balloon angioplasty: OR [95%CI] 1.06 [0.70-1.59], p = .79). However, paclitaxel-coated balloon showed significant increase in long-term mortality compared to balloon angioplasty and bypass (vs. balloon angioplasty: OR [95% CI] 1.48 [1.06-2.07], p = .021; vs. bypass: OR [95%CI] 1.73 [1.05-2.84], p = .031, respectively). In this meta-analysis of randomized trials, there was no significant increase in mortality with paclitaxel eluting stent, but there was increased risk of long-term mortality in paclitaxel-coated balloon for the treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease.

Influencia de la neoateroesclerosis en el pronóstico y la respuesta al tratamiento de los pacientes con reestenosis en el stent

Introduction and objectivesNeoatherosclerosis is one of the causes of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Our objective was to evaluate the influence of neoatherosclerosis on prognosis and treatment response in patients with ISR. MethodsThis is a pooled analysis of the optical coherence tomography (OCT)-substudies of 2 multicenter, randomized clinical trials, RIBS IV and V, comparing treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon vs everolimus-eluting stent in patients with ISR. OCT evaluation was performed at baseline and at 6 to 9 months. Neoatherosclerosis was defined in baseline OCT as neointima with calcified or lipid content. We evaluated the angiographic and OCT results at 6 to 9 months and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years of follow-up in patients with and without neoatherosclerosis treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon or everolimus-eluting stents. ResultsSixty-four patients underwent OCT at the time of the index procedure. Neoatherosclerosis was documented in 23 (36%) lesions. Angiographic follow-up at 6 to 9 months showed no differences in restenosis [5 (24%) vs 6 (15%) P=.49], minimum lumen diameter (1.79±0.7 vs 1.94±0.6mm; P=.41) or late loss (0.33±0.7 vs 0.15±0.5; P=.34) in patients with and without neoatherosclerosis, respectively. Follow-up OCT confirmed the absence of differences in quantitative parameters and the characteristics of tissue coverage between the 2 groups. At 3 years of follow-up, the major adverse cardiovascular events rate was 3 (13%) vs 5 (12%) in the neoatherosclerosis and nonneoatherosclerosis groups (HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.22-3.93; P=.93). ConclusionsIn this limited study population, OCT-defined neoatherosclerosis did not seem to influence acute and long-term outcomes in patients randomized to paclitaxel-coated balloon or everolimus-eluting stents for ISR.

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Access Maintenance: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-analysis

The comparison between paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty and plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) for hemodialysis (HD) access stenosis or occlusion has not been well investigated. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare the all-cause mortality, HD access primary patency, and circuit primary patency after endovascular maintenance procedures using PCB vs PBA.