Pacing Burden Research Articles

Feasibility of intraprocedural integration of cardiac CT to guide left ventricular lead implantation for CRT upgrades.

BackgroundOptimal positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead is an important determinant of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.ObjectiveEvaluate the feasibility of intraprocedural integration of cardiac computed tomography (CT) to guide LV lead implantation for CRT upgrades.MethodsPatients undergoing LV lead upgrade underwent ECG‐gated cardiac CT dyssynchrony and LV scar assessment. Target American Heart Association segment selection was determined using latest non‐scarred mechanically activating segments overlaid onto real‐time fluoroscopy with image co‐registration to guide optimal LV lead implantation. Hemodynamic validation was performed using a pressure wire in the LV cavity (dP/dtmax)).Results18 patients (male 94%, 55.6% ischemic cardiomyopathy) with RV pacing burden 60.0 ± 43.7% and mean QRS duration 154 ± 30 ms underwent cardiac CT. 10/10 ischemic patients had CT evidence of scar and these segments were excluded as targets. Seventeen out of 18 (94%) patients underwent successful LV lead implantation with delivery to the CT target segment in 15 out of 18 (83%) of patients. Acute hemodynamic response (dP/dtmax ≥ 10%) was superior with LV stimulation in CT target versus nontarget segments (83.3% vs. 25.0%; p = .012). Reverse remodeling at 6 months (LV end‐systolic volume improvement ≥15%) occurred in 60% of subjects (4/8 [50.0%] ischemic cardiomyopathy vs. 5/7 [71.4%] nonischemic cardiomyopathy, p = .608).ConclusionIntraprocedural integration of cardiac CT to guide optimal LV lead placement is feasible with superior hemodynamics when pacing in CT target segments and favorable volumetric response rates, despite a high proportion of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Multicentre, randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate whether intraprocedural integration of cardiac CT is superior to standard care.

Atrioventricular Block after Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

Tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is associated with a high risk of postoperative pacemaker requirement. We set out to identify the incidence of atrioventricular block (AVB) after TV surgery and determine whether atrioventricular conduction recovers within time.We investigated pre/intra- and postoperative predictors of AVB in patients who underwent tricuspid valve surgery (not only isolated TV surgery) at our institution between 2004 and 2017. Patients who had pacemakers prior to surgery were excluded.One year after surgery, 5.8% of the surviving cohort had received a pacemaker due to AVB. In the complete follow-up time, 33 out of 505 patients required pacemaker implantation because of AVB. Of the 37 patients who presented to the intensive care unit postoperatively with AVB III, 14 (38%) underwent pacemaker implantation for AVB, and 20 (54%) did not require a pacemaker. AVB III at ICU admission was identified as a predictor of pacemaker implantation (OR: 9.7, CI: 3.8-24.5, P < 0.001). TV endocarditis was also identified as a predictor (OR: 12.4, CI: 3.3-46.3, P < 0.001). Eleven out of 32 patients (34%) with tricuspid endocarditis required a pacemaker for AVB. The mean ventricular pacing burden within the first 5 years after pacemaker implantation was 79%.The issue of AVB after TV surgery is significant. Both the initial rhythm after surgery and etiology of the tricuspid disease can help predict pacemaker requirement. Within the first 5 years after surgery, the ventricular pacing burden remains high without relevant rhythm recovery.

The Prevalence and Short-Term Outcomes of Ventricular Dyssynchrony after Right Ventricular Pacing

Objective: Long-term right ventricular pacing has been associated with an increased risk of heart failure and cardiomyopathy. The pathophysiology of cardiomyopathy associated with right ventricular pacing remains unclear. We aim to evaluate the burden and short-term outcomes of ventricular dyssynchrony after immediate permanent pacemaker implantation. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study examined consecutive patients who had permanent pacemaker implantation at Vajira Hospital in 2019. Left ventricular systolic function, specifically left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and echocardiographic ventricular dyssynchrony parameters were assessed. The endpoints included the prevalence of ventricular dyssynchrony, new-onset cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and death. The correlation between QRS complex duration, the burden of ventricular pacing, and echocardiographic ventricular dyssynchrony was measured. Results: Thirty-six consecutive patients underwent pacemaker implantation. The prevalence of mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony was 22.2% using the interventricular conduction delay method, 41.7% using LV pre-ejection period method, and 11.1% using the septal posterior wall motion abnormality method. Electrical ventricular dyssynchrony was 86.1% and new-onset cardiomyopathy was 17.1% after 3 months of permanent pacemaker implantation. The right ventricular pacing of more than 20% was significantly associated with cardiomyopathy (p < 0.022) and heart failure (log-rank, p = 0.049) within 3 months. But heart failure was not associated with mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony parameters (log-rank, p = 0.610; hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 - 7.96; p = 0.613 for IVMD and log-rank, p = 0.398; HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 - 3316.7 for SPWMD). Conclusion: Mechanical and electrical ventricular dyssynchrony are common findings in right ventricular pacing. High-burden right ventricular pacing after 3 months of permanent pacemaker implantation is often associated with cardiomyopathy and heart failure, but mechanical and electrical ventricular dyssynchrony does not predict a short-term decline in left ventricular systolic function and heart failure.

BetaBlockade and the Reversal of Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) in Functional AV Block

High right ventricular pacing burden can lead to PICM due to ventricular dyssynchrony and adverse remodelling. In our patient with PICM, beta blockade reduced the native sinoatrial rate, paradoxically augmenting AV conduction, improving LV dysfunction and heart failure symptoms.

Novel left ventricular cardiac synchronization: left ventricular septal pacing or left bundle branch pacing?

It is well recognized that a high burden of right ventricular pacing results in deleterious clinical outcomes over the long term. His bundle pacing can achieve optimal ventricular synchronization; however, relatively high pacing thresholds, low R-wave amplitudes, and the long-term performance have been concerns. Recently, left ventricular (LV) septal endocardium pacing (LVSP) has demonstrated improved acute haemodynamics. Another novel technique of intraseptal left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) via transvenous approach has been adopted rapidly and has demonstrated its feasibility and effectiveness. This article reviews the clinical application and differences between LVSP and LBBP. Compared with LVSP, LBBP has strict criteria for left conduction system capture and lead location. In addition to LV septal capture it also stimulates the proximal left bundle branch, resulting in rapid and physiological LV activation. With a uniformity and standardization of the implant procedure and definitions, it may be possible to achieve widespread application of this form of physiological pacing.

European experience with a first totally leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker system.

AimsTotally leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be delivered with a combination of Micra and WiSE-CRT systems. We describe the technical feasibility and first insights into the safety and efficacy of this combination in European experience.Methods and resultsPatients enrolled had indication for both Micra and WiSE-CRT systems because of heart failure related to high burden of pacing by a Micra necessitating system upgrade or inability to implant a conventional CRT system because of infectious or anatomical conditions. The endpoints of the study were technical success of WiSE-CRT implantation with right ventricle-synchonized CRT delivery, acute QRS duration reduction, and freedom from procedure-related major adverse events. All eight WiSE-CRT devices were able to detect the Micra pacing output and to be trained to deliver synchronous LV endocardial pacing. Acute QRS reduction following WiSE-CRT implantation was observed in all eight patients (mean QRS 204.38 ± 30.26 vs. 137.5 ± 24.75 mS, P = 0.012). Seven patients reached 6 months of follow-up. At 6 months after WiSE-CRT implantation, there was a significant increase in LV ejection fraction (28.43 ± 8.01% vs. 39.71 ± 11.89%; P = 0.018) but no evidence of LV reverse remodelling or improvement in New York Heart Association class.ConclusionThe Micra and the WiSE-CRT systems can successfully operate together to deliver total leadless CRT to a patient. Moreover, the WiSE-CRT system provides the only means to upgrade the large population of Micra patients to CRT capability without replacing the Micra. The range of application of this combination could broaden in the future with the upcoming developments of leadless cardiac pacing.

Pacing-associated cardiomyopathy in adult congenital heart disease

ObjectivesLong-term single-site ventricular pacing may adversely affect ventricular function, due to dyssynchronous systemic ventricular contraction. We sought to determine the incidence, predictors and outcomes of pacing-associated cardiomyopathy (PACM) in an...

Abstract 17155: Is Aortic Annular Calcium Burden a Predictor of Post TAVR Right Ventricular Pacing?

Background: Preliminary reports have suggested the role of annular calcium in independently predicting pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data regarding role of calcium in the aortic-valvular complex on pacemaker dependency is lacking. Hypothesis: Calcium volume and score in the aortic annular region predicts RV (right ventricle) pacing burden. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study at our tertiary care center including patients who had new pacemaker implantation after TAVR procedure (n=47). Standard calcium scoring software was used to demarcate and quantify the calcium along the aortic cusps and subvalvular region and dichotomized into septal and non-septal based on proximity to the interventricular septum. Standard statistical tests were used for analysis with two-sided p-value &lt;0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean age was 78.6 ± 10.3 years and females were 42.6%. At baseline, 44.7% had narrow QRS complex, with 31.9% had right bundle branch block (RBBB), 8.5% had left bundle branch block (LBBB). Median Pre-TAVR QRS duration was 112 ms. Median septal and non-septal calcium score were 646 and 474 with a volume of 441 mm 3 and 327.2 mm 3 , respectively. Patients with progression to complete heart block (CHB) during index admission had significantly higher non-septal volume (650 mm 3 vs 344 mm 3 ;p=0.01) and score (892 vs 485;p=0.01) when compared to progression after discharge. Similarly, the high burden of RV pacing (&gt;40%) was associated with lower septal calcium score (989 vs 552, p= 0.03) and volume (717 mm 3 vs 385 mm 3 , p=0.03) within 3 months of TAVR. No septal or non-septal parameters were predictive of pacing burden for mid-term (3-12 months) and long-term (&gt;12 months) follow up. Septal calcium parameters were not predictive of RV pacing burden or progression to CHB. Conclusion: Quantitative calcium in the non-septal and septal regions were predictive of early progression to CHB and a higher burden of RV pacing, respectively. Larger scale studies on calcium distribution and the burden should be performed to validate our findings.

Abstract 12722: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Higher Right Ventricle Pacing Percentage Predicts Greater Improvement in Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade is indicated for improvement of cardiac function in patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing burden &gt;40% and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. It is uncertain whether the CRT response is different among patients with high (≥90%) versus intermediate (&lt;90%) burden of baseline RV pacing. Hypothesis: To assess the impact of baseline RV pacing percent on ECG and echocardiographic response after CRT upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all CRT upgrades for pacing induced cardiomyopathy at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. Cohorts were grouped by RV pacing burden ≥90% or &lt;90%. QRS duration, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular internal dimension systolic (LVIDs) were assessed at baseline and 3-12 months post CRT upgrade. Results: We included 82 patients (age 74 ± 12 yr., 71% male) who underwent CRT upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy. The RV pacing burden was ≥90% [median 99% (IQR 98-99%)] in 61 patients, and &lt;90% [median 79% (IQR 69-88%)] in 21 patients. There was a trend towards greater reduction in QRS duration in the ≥90% RV pacing group (28 ± 29 ms vs. 22 ± 38 ms, p=0.5). Improvement in LVEF was greater in ≥90% vs. &lt;90% RV pacing group (14.3 ± 10.1% vs. 6.3 ± 10.1%, p=0.003). The association persisted on multivariable adjustment for age, sex and baseline LVEF (p=0.004). There was a trend towards greater % reduction in LVIDs in the ≥90% vs. &lt;90% RV pacing group (6.4 ± 15.5 % vs. 3.9 ± 14.3 %, p=0.5) [Figure]. Conclusions: A higher baseline RV pacing burden predicts a greater improvement in LVEF after CRT upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy.

Abstract 16813: The Prevalence and Predictors of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) in Younger Patients

Background: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) has been increasingly recognized as a cause of heart failure in patients with pacemakers. Thus far, clinical trials and observational studies of PICM have largely included elderly patients with mean age &gt; 70 years. The prevalence and predictors of PICM in younger patients (age ≤ 59 years) after pacemaker implantation are not known. Methods: We retrospectively studied the prevalence and predictors of PICM in younger adults (18-59 years) who received single ventricular chamber or dual chamber pacemakers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 1986-2015. Patients without documented ventricular pacing burden, and patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt; 30% were excluded. PICM was defined as LVEF drop of ≥ 10% and LVEF &lt; 50% during follow up in the setting of significant right ventricular pacing (≥ 20%), without alternative explanations for cardiomyopathy. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized to study the factors associated with hazard of developing PICM. Results: A total of 325 patients were included in the study. 182 patients had high ventricular pacing (≥ 20%), which was associated with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced baseline LVEF in addition to atrioventricular block (AVB) in the multivariate analysis. During the median follow up duration of 11.5 (Interquartile range 7 - 17) years, 38 patients (11.7%) developed PICM (1.3 per 100 patient-year). The median time to the development of PICM was 5 (Interquartile range 2 - 10) years. Older age (HR 2.5 for age ≥ 50 years, P = 0.013), reduced baseline LVEF (HR 2.4, P = 0.022), and AVB (HR 2.7, P = 0.007) were associated with an increased risk of PICM in the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, pre-existing AF was associated with an increased risk of PICM in patients without pre-implant AVB (HR 8.8 compared to the absence of both AF and AVB, P = 0.039). Conclusion: The incidence of PICM in young patients was low in this cohort of younger patients. Older age, baseline reduced LVEF, and AVB were associated with an increased risk of PICM in the young patient cohort. AF was associated with an increased risk of PICM in a subset of patients without pre-existing AVB at implant.

Development of New-Onset or Progressive Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Permanent HIS Bundle Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing: Results From the RUSH HBP Registry.

BackgroundConventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) has been associated with an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to compare the occurrence of new‐onset AF and assessed AF disease progression during long‐term follow‐up between His bundle pacing (HBP) and RVP.Methods and ResultsWe included patients undergoing initial dual‐chamber pacemaker implants at Rush University Medical Center between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019. A total of 360 patients were evaluated, and 225 patients (HBP, n=105; RVP, n=120) were included in the study. Among the 148 patients (HBP, n=72; RVP, n=76) with no history of AF, HBP demonstrated a lower risk of new‐onset AF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28–0.99; P=0.046) compared with traditional RVP. This benefit was observed with His or RVP burden exceeding 20% (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13–0.64; P=0.002), ≥40% (HR, 0.31; P=0.007), ≥60% (HR, 0.35; P=0.015), and ≥80% (HR, 0.40; P=0.038). There was no difference with His or RV pacing burden <20% (HR, 0.613; 95% CI, 0.213–1.864; P=0.404). In patients with a prior history of AF, there was no difference in AF progression (P=0.715); however, in a subgroup of patients with a pacing burden ≥40%, HBP demonstrated a trend toward a lower risk of AF progression (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03–1.16; P=0.072).ConclusionsHBP demonstrated a lower risk of new‐onset AF compared with RVP, which was primarily observed at a higher pacing burden.

His bundle pacing preserves left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with conduction disease and high risk of development pacing induced cardiomyopathy

Abstract Background His bundle pacing (HBP), contrary to right ventricular myocardial pacing (RVP), offers the most physiological activation of both ventricles and may not lead to pacing induced cardiomyopathy. The change in myocardial structure in failing heart due to myocardial pacing should be reflected in plasmatic levels of collagen metabolism biomarkers and inflammation markers. Purpose To compare a difference in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and levels of selected biomarkers between two groups: HBP and RVP (preferably septal). Methods Eighty-six patients with conduction disease indicated to permanent cardiac pacing were randomized to HBP or RVP. Only high-risk patients for pacing induced cardiomyopathy development were included. Blood sampling and echocardiography were performed on the consequent day and 180 days after the pacemaker implantation. The measured biomarkers were: matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1), galectin-3 (GAL3), ST2/IL-33R (ST2/IL) and TGF-beta 1 (TGFβ1). Statistical analysis included Students t-test, Fishers exact test and Chi-squared test. The p&amp;lt;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results First group included 39 patients with HBP (selective or non-selective His bundle capture) and 47 patients with RVP. Both groups were similar with respect to gender, LVEF, QRS duration and the baseline levels of evaluated biomarkers. In both groups, there was a high burden of ventricular pacing after 6 months (above 90%) (p = NS). The ejection fraction of the left ventricle did not change in the HBPgroup (60 vs 60%, p=0,3), but it decreased significantly in the RVP group (59 vs 56%, p=0,004). The decline in the LVEF of at least 5% occurred in 12 patients (26%) from RVP group, compared to 3 patients (8%) in HBP group (p=0,03). The blood levels of dMMP-9 (p=0,02), TIMP-1 (p=0,003), ST2/IL (p=0,003) and TGFβ1 (p=0,021) declined significantly after 180 days in the HBP group, decline of Galectin 3 was nonsignificant. In the RVP group, there was a significant decline in blood levels of MMP-9 (p=0,014), TIMP-1 (p=0,001) and ST2/IL (p= 0,04), decline of Galectin 3 and TGFβ1 was nonsignificant. The biomarker level difference was not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion His bundle pacing, contrary to right ventricular myocardial pacing, preserves LVEF in patients with high risk of pacing induced cardiomyopathy development. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Charles University research programme. Q38. UNCE/MED/002

Effect of pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement on long- and mid-term mortality

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become quite common. Atrioventricular conduction defects remain a frequent complication resulting with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Past studies showed conflicting results regarding PPM effect on mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of PPM implantation on mid- and long-term mortality in a large cohort of patients who underwent TAVR. Patients undergoing TAVR between 2009 and 2019 were categorized into groups: no PPM implanted (no-PPM), PPM implanted before the procedure (pre-PPM), and PPM implanted postprocedure (post-PPM). All-cause mortality up to 6 years was compared. Subanalyses were performed according to pacing burden. Proportion of patients who had decreased left ventricular ejection fraction within 1 year of the procedure after TAVR was also recorded. A total of 1489 patients were followed. Unadjusted mortality was similar for patients regardless of PPM status within 12 months (P > .187), yet within 72 months, mortality was similar for the post-PPM (P = .257) and higher for pre-PPM (hazard ratio 1.53; P = .002) groups. Analysis adjusted by clinical characteristics did not show any independent long- or mid-term survival effects of PPM (P > .563). Analysis according to pacing burden showed no significant mortality difference (P > .8). Analysis of post-PPM patients with "high" or "near constant" (>40%) pacing burden vs no-PPM patients showed similar mortality for both mid- and long-term mortality (P = .055 and P = .513). Left ventricular ejection fraction decrease within 1 year was more common in both PPMgroups, with a higher proportion with higher pacing burden (P < .001). This cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TAVR showed that postprocedure PPM was not associated with increased long-term mortality. This conclusion was not altered by ventricular pacing burden.

Predictors of ventricular pacing burden after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BackgroundIn the era of an expanding use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), conduction disturbances and the requirement for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remains a clinical concern.HypothesisUsing a single‐center experience, we sought to identify predictors of ventricular pacing burden after TAVR in patients who required PPM implantation.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 359 consecutive patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis who underwent TAVR at our institution between September 2013 and July 2019. Thirty patients (8.4%) required a PPM within 30 days after TAVR. Pre and post‐TAVR electrocardiograms, pre‐TAVR echocardiograms and computed tomography (CT), TAVR procedural details and post‐TAVR device interrogation records at 1, 3, and 6 months were reviewed.ResultsMean percentage of ventricular pacing (VP%) at 1, 3, and 6 months was 58%, 59%, and 56% respectively. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, patients who had low VP% < 5% at 6 months were more likely to have a prosthesis/echocardiography‐derived left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter ratio < 1.3 (OR 7.00, P‐value .048), prosthesis/CT‐derived aortic annulus diameter ratio < 1.02 (OR 7.11, P‐value .047), post‐TAVR new‐onset LBBB (OR 16.80, P‐value .019), time to PPM implantation greater than 2 days post‐TAVR (OR 9.38, P‐value .026) and pre‐TAVR use of a beta blocker (OR 9.40, P‐value .026).ConclusionsIn patients who required a PPM implantation post‐TAVR, a lower TAVR prosthesis/LVOT or aortic annulus diameter ratio, post‐TAVR new‐onset LBBB and later time of PPM implantation showed a trend toward predicting a low VP% at 6 months.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Window Into the Evolution of Conduction Disease in CardiacAmyloidosis.

This study characterized the relationship between conduction disease and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) through longitudinal analysis of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) data. Bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias are commonly reported in CA and may precede a CA diagnosis, although the natural history of conduction disease in CA is not well-described. Patients with CA (transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy [ATTR-CM] and light-chain amyloidosis [AL-CA]) and a CIED were identified within the Duke University Health System. Patient characteristics at the time of implantation, including demographics and data relevant to CA diagnosis, cardiac imaging, and CIED were recorded. CIED interrogations were analyzed for pacing and atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, activity level, lead parameters, and ventricular arrhythmia incidence and/or therapy. Thirty-four patients with CA (7 with AL-CA, 27 with ATTR-CM [78% with wild-type]; 82% men) with median age of 75 years and a mean ejection fraction of 42 ± 13% had a CIED implanted for bradycardia (65%) or prevention of sudden cardiac death (35%). CIED implantation preceded CA diagnosis in 14 patients (41%). Over a mean follow-up of 3.1± 4.0 years, right ventricular sensing amplitudes decreased but did not result in device malfunction; lead impedances and capture thresholds remained stable. Between post-implantation years 1 and 5, mean ventricular pacing increased from 56 ± 9% to 96 ± 1% (p=0.003) and AF burden increased from 2 ± 1.3 to 17 ± 3 h/day (p=0.0002). Ventricular arrhythmias were common (mean episodes per patient per year: 6.7 ± 2.3 [ATTR-CM] and 5.1 ± 3.2 [AL-CA]) but predominately nonsustained; only 1 patient with AL-CA required implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Longitudinal analysis of CIED data in patients with CA revealed progressive conduction disease, with high AF burden and eventual dependence on ventricular pacing, although lead parameters remained stable. Ventricular arrhythmias were common but predominantly nonsustained, particularly in ATTR-CM.

842The effect of post TAVR pacemaker implantation on mid and long-term mortality

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is standard of care for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at high risk for surgery. Atrioventricular conduction defects remain a frequent complication of the procedure, and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation has been associated with increased long-term mortality in some studies. Purpose We evaluated the influence of PPM on mid and long-term mortality in a very large cohort of patients undergoing TAVR. Methods All patients undergoing TAVR in one tertiary cardiac catheterization center were included. Patients were categorized into three groups: 1) patients with a PPM implantation prior to the procedure, 2) patients with post procedural PPM implantation and 3) patients without PPM. Univariate and multivariate comparisons was preformed for all-cause mortality for up to 6 years. Sub-analyses were preformed according to ventricular pacing burden on outcome. Results A cohort of 1,306 post TAVR patients were followed for a median period of 38 [IQR 20-58] months. Risk factors associated with need for post procedural PPM implantation were male gender, dialysis treatment, NYHA ≥3 and pre procedural RBBB (p &amp;lt; 0.03 for all). Univariate mid-term (up to 12 months) and long-term (up to 72 months) mortality were similar for patients regardless of post procedural PPM (p = 0.361 and p = 0.287 accordingly), yet long term mortality was significantly higher in the pre-TAVR PPM group (OR 1.6, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis of mortality by PPM group and patients" clinical characteristics did not show any independent mid or long-term survival effects of PPM either prior to or after the procedure (p = 0.974 and p = 0.300 accordingly). Sub-analysis of the cohort according to average right ventricular pacing percent, showed no significant mid-term or long-term mortality difference between patients having high (&amp;gt;90%), moderate (40-90%), mild (mild 40-10%) and minimal (&amp;lt;10%) pacing burden (p &amp;gt; 0.320 for all comparisons). Analysis of patients with high pacing burden vs. non-paced patients showed similar mortality trends for both mid and long-term mortality (p = 0.537 and p = 0.127 accordingly). Conclusion This long-term cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TAVR showed that post procedure PPM was not associated with increased long-term mortality. This conclusion was not altered by ventricular pacing burden. Abstract Figure. Survival curves for the three PPM groups

Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Normal Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Atrioventricular Block

Patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection function (EF) and atrioventricular block (AVB) who are anticipated for high-burden of right ventricular (RV) pacing possess a risk to develop pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PIC) and adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, the aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of RV PIC in patients with preserved LVEF, AVB, and high-burden of RV pacing. One thousand and thirteen patients with second or third-degree AVB underwent first time pacemaker implantation between January 2002 and August 2016. A total of 203 patients with a newly implanted pacemaker, normal baseline LVEF, and high burden of RV pacing were included in the present study. Follow-up echocardiography was examined for a new decrease in LVEF of 10% or higher. Alternative causes for cardiomyopathy were ruled out. Patient characteristics, echocardiographic measurements, device clinic data, mortality, and hospitalizations for heart failure were collected and compared between the PIC and the non-PIC groups. Fifty-one patients (25%) developed LV dysfunction with 22 patients (11%), showing LVEF < 40%. During a mean follow-up of 49.2 months, the risk of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the PIC group versus non-PIC group (35.3% vs 19.1%, p = 0.009). In conclusion the incidence of PIC in patients with normal LVEF and AVB, who are anticipated for high-burden of RV pacing is high. PIC in patients with a previously normal LV function is associated with unfavorable long-term clinical outcomes, including higher rates of heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality.

His-bundle pacing is the best approach to physiological pacing.

His-bundle pacing is the best approach to physiological pacing.

REPROGRAMMING TO PREVENT PROGRESSIVE PACEMAKER-INDUCED REMODELLING

Pacemakers are safe and effective for bradycardia. Studies suggest left ventricular systolic (LV) dysfunction and heart failure are common in this population. Personalised pacemaker programming in an observational cohort has successfully reduced pacing burden improving LV function. No trial has

Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Morbidity in Adults After Fontan Repair

Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is a negative prognostic marker in patients with Fontan palliation; however, data delineating outcomes in adult patients with pacemaker requirements are lacking. We hypothesize that high ventricular pacing burden is associated with adverse outcomes in adult Fontan patients. We performed a retrospective review comprising adult patients with history of Fontan repair. A high burden of ventricular pacing was defined as ≥40% pacing. Major adverse clinical events (MACE) were defined as all-cause mortality or need for advanced cardiac therapies (ventricular assist device or heart transplant). A total of 145 adult patients with Fontan were studied for a median of 3.1 years. Twenty (14%) patients had implanted pacemakers with ≥40% ventricular pacing. Twelve events occurred in those with ≥40% ventricular pacing (incidence 60.0%) versus 11 in those without (incidence 8.8%). In multivariable analysis, ≥40% ventricular-pacing (odds ratio 12.51, confidence interval [CI] 3.56 to 43.83, p <0.001) was associated with MACE independent of initial Fontan type, New York Heart Association functional class at baseline, or history of atrial tachyarrythmia. In survival analysis, patients with ≥40% ventricular pacing had nearly 8 times the risk of MACE compared with those with a lower ventricular pacing burden (hazard ratio 7.79, 95% CI 2.56 to 23.66, p <0.001), whereas patients with atrial-only or <40% ventricular pacing burden had a trend toward higher hazard of MACE compared with those without permanent pacemaker (hazard ratio 3.38, 95% CI 0.92 to 12.47, p = 0.07) that did not meet statistical significance. These findings suggest that high ventricular pacing burden contributes to poor outcomes in the adult Fontan patients and bear consideration when determining optimal treatment of tachyarrhythmias in this population.