netics, Ghent, Belgium). ROC curve analyses were performed to assess diagnostic power. Added diagnostic value was explored by comparing the Ab isoforms performance to the performance of the core AD CSF biomarkers: Ab 1-42, T-tau and P-tau 181P. Results: The Ab isoforms levels correlated moderately with MMSE scores and disease duration in the dementia due to AD group, suggesting a correlation with disease progression. CSF Ab 1-42 levels were lower in e4 carriers as compared to non-carriers. The diagnostic value of the Ab 1-42/Ab 1-40 ratio was better than the diagnostic performance of Ab 1-42 in most differential situations. The best biomarkers to discriminate dementia due to AD from FTDwereAb 1-42/Ab 1-37 and the relative value of Ab 1-42 (AUC1⁄4 0.851 and 0.831 respectively). The best biomarkers to distinguish dementia due to AD and DLBwere Ab 1-42/Ab 1-38 and Ab 1-42/T-tau (AUC 1⁄4 0.843 and 0.838 respectively). Conclusions: In conclusion, Ab isoforms increase the diagnostic performance of Ab 1-42 and they are of help for differential dementia diagnosis, especially to differentiate FTD and DLB from AD and to diagnose AD in patients with normal Ab 1-42 levels. Furthermore, in contrast to Ab 1-42, Ab isoforms are correlated with disease severity in AD.
Read full abstract