In this study, two metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), zirconium (IV)-based MOF-808 and chromium (III)-based MIL-101 were investigated for the selective adsorption of nickel (Ni2+) over cobalt (Co2+) and the role of the nitrogen (N)-containing functional groups was evaluated using pyrazole (PyC) and amine (–NH2). Selective adsorption and adsorption rates were quantified using batch adsorption experiments. The post-reaction MOFs after Co2+ and Ni2+ adsorption were characterized with attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron (XPS) spectroscopies to identify the active adsorption sites and to infer the adsorption mechanism. The overall adsorption of Co2+ and Ni2+ by MOF-808 and MIL-101 increased after their surface functionalization with PyC and –NH2. However, selective Ni2+ adsorption was only observed with MOF-808-PyC. The pseudo-second-order model fit to the kinetic adsorption data suggests chemically driven adsorption of Co2+ and Ni2+ onto all examined MOFs. The ATR-FTIR and XPS analyses of MOFs with adsorbed Co2+ and Ni2+ indicate that the N sites in PyC and –NH2 are the reactive sites. ATR-FTIR analyses of aqueous PyC solutions with metal cations show a greater shift in the N–H vibrational band of PyC when interacting with Ni2+ compared to Co2+, which is linked to a stronger interaction between Ni2+ and PyC, resulting in the Ni2+ selectivity by PyC-functionalized MOF-808. We propose that PyC, as a π-acceptor ligand, exhibits greater affinity for Ni2+ compared to Co2+ due to i) the greater electronegativity of Ni2+ and ii) the greater stability of Ni2+complex with PyC ligand based on the Irving-Williams series and ligand field stabilization energy based on the electron configuration differences between Co2+ (3d7) and Ni2+ (3d8).
Read full abstract