Laboratory evidence has indicated that at least part of the biological action of ionizing radiations is due to inhibition of sulfhydryl obligate intracellular enzyme systems by oxidation of the sulfhydryl radical, e.g., cysteine to cystine (1, 2). The protective action against lethal total-body irradiation offered by sulfhydryl donors such as cysteine and glutathione is further evidence of the importance of this mechanism (3, 4). Similarly, substances which temporarily inhibit oxidation of sulfhydryl (—SH) provide significant protection against lethal irradiation. Cyanide, azide, and malononitrile (5), and anoxic anoxia (6) are examples. Cortisone and ACTH have recently been shown also to inhibit the sulfhydryl obligate systems as part of their fundamental biological action (7, 8). Therefore, some synergistic action of these drugs and irradiation could logically be expected. On the other hand, attempts have been made to demonstrate their value as protective agents against whole-body irradiation— one being reported as successful (9) and another as unsuccessful (10). The present report concerns an investigation into what seemed to us to be a more logical possibility, namely, a synergistic action between cortisone and whole-body irradiation. Method As test animals white male mice of a single inbred strain were used. To provide further uniformity they were fed and observed for ten days, reaching a fairly uniform weight of 25 gm. They were then divided at random into four groups of 12 mice each for the initial experiment. One group received a single dose of 220-kv. roentgen irradiation amounting to 750 r, including back-scatter, estimated to be at least and probably more than an LD 50 dose. A second group was irradiated in the same way after being given 1 mg. of cortisone subcutaneously twenty-four and twelve hours previously. The third group also received 750 r, but the cortisone was given in daily injections of 1.0 mg. following the irradiation. The animals of the fourth group served as controls, given cortisone daily only as long as there were survivors in the third group. This initial experiment was more or less exploratory, to determine gross effects and investigate protection or synergism with different timing. The results are summarized in Figure 2. On the basis of these observations, discussed below, another experiment was set up with dosages and timing selected with a view to proving more conclusively the apparent synergism initially observed. For the second experiment the same kind of mice and the same treatment conditions were used. Three groups of 12, 13, and 13 mice, respectively, were again selected at random after an initial period of feeding and observation.