Oxaliplatin-based Regimens Research Articles

835TiP - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction: Moonlight, a randomized phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO

835TiP - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction: Moonlight, a randomized phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO

608P - Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus mFOLFOX or FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): KEYNOTE-651 cohorts B and D

BackgroundPembro, a PD-1 inhibitor, confers durable benefit in many tumor types but has limited efficacy in non–microsatellite instability–high (MSI-high)/pMMR mCRC. Chemotherapies that include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and irinotecan, which are commonly used to treat mCRC, may modulate intrinsic tumor immunogenicity and sensitize tumors to immunotherapy agents. In the phase 1b KEYNOTE-651 study (NCT03374254), pembro + mFOLFOX7 (cohort B) or pembro + FOLFIRI (cohort D) was evaluated in patients with non–MSI-high/pMMR mCRC. MethodsPatients were ≥18 years with non–MSI-high/pMMR mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, and no prior systemic chemotherapy for stage IV mCRC (cohort B) or 1 prior therapy including a fluoropyrimidine + oxaliplatin-based regimen (cohort D). Patients received pembro 200mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) + mFOLFOX7 (oxaliplatin [85mg/m2]; leucovorin [400mg/m2]; 5-FU [2400mg/m2]) Q2W (cohort B) or pembro 200mg Q3W + FOLFIRI (irinotecan [180mg/m2]; leucovorin [400mg/m2]; 5-FU [2400mg/m2]) Q2W (cohort D). Primary objectives were safety/tolerability and establishment of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D); the secondary objective was objective response rate. ResultsAt data cutoff (Feb 18, 2019), 15 patients in cohort B and 16 in cohort D started treatment; median follow-up was 6.8 months (cohort B) and 5.7 months (cohort D). Treatment was discontinued in 4 patients (27%) in cohort B (adverse event [AE], n=1 [7%]; PD, n=3 [20%]) and 9 patients (56%) in cohort D (AEs, PD, patient withdrawal; n=3 [19%] each). There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity in cohort D: grade 3 small-intestinal obstruction. See RP2Ds for cohorts B and D in the Methods section. All patients had ≥1 treatment-related AE (TRAE). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 8 patients each in cohort B (53%) and cohort D (50%), most commonly anemia and neutropenia (13% each) in cohort B and neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, and leukopenia (13% each) in cohort D. There were no grade 4-5 TRAEs. Efficacy results will be presented. ConclusionsPembro in combination with mFOLFOX7 or FOLFIRI was safe and tolerable in patients with mCRC. Clinical trial identificationNCT03374254; Release date: December 15, 2017. Editorial acknowledgementJacqueline Kolston, PhD, of the ApotheCom pembrolizumab team (Yardley, PA, USA); Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Legal entity responsible for the studyMerck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and Array BioPharma. FundingMerck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, and Array BioPharma. DisclosureR. Kim: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. J. Kortmansky: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche. L. Wong: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc./Astellas US, Inc.; Research grant / Funding (institution): BeiGene, Ltd; Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis, Inc.; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): NovoCure, Inc.; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pierre Fabre Médicament; Research grant / Funding (institution): PledPharma AB; Research grant / Funding (institution): SynCore Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme, Inc.; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pharmacyclics, Inc.; Research grant / Funding (institution): TESARO; Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array. M. Tehfe: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Taisho. J.J. Li: Full / Part-time employment: Merck & Co., Inc. M. Lee: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Merck & Co., Inc. C. Mayo: Full / Part-time employment: Merck & Co., Inc. P. Marinello: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Merck & Co., Inc. E. Chiorean: Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Halozyme; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Five Prime; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Halozyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ignyta/Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Stemline; Research grant / Funding (institution): Macrogenetics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

620P - Bevacizumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC 1602): A single-arm, phase II study

BackgroundElderly patients often cannot tolerate the usual combination of two cytotoxic agents. Recently, bevacizumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) was shown to be a good candidate regimen for vulnerable patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus FTD/TPI in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. MethodsPatients aged 70 years or older, with previously untreated unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer, who were not deemed to be candidates for oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimens, were included in this trial. The treatment consisted of FTD/TPI (35mg/m2, twice daily on Days 1–5 and Days 8–12) with bevacizumab (5mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 and 15), administrated every 4 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Based on a previous report, we estimated the expected PFS as 9 months and the lower limit of interest as 5 months. As this research was designed to have a statistical power of 80% and one-sided type I error of 0.10, we calculated that 32 patients were required and planned enrolling 35 patients. The secondary endpoints were response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). ResultsBetween 2017 January and 2018 March, 39 patients (17 male; 22 female), with a median age of 77.5 years (range: 70–88), ECOG performance status 0 (79.5%) or 1 (20.5%), and RAS WT/MT/Unknown 23.1/41.0/35.9% were enrolled. The median PFS was 8.0 months (80% CI 6.7–11.2), and the median OS was not reached. The best response was 40.5% (15/37; 95% CI: 24.8–57.9), and the disease control rate was 86.5% (32/37; 95% CI: 71.2–95.5). The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 AEs were neutropenia (71.8%), leucopenia (48.7%), hypertension (20.5%), anemia (17.9%), anorexia (12.8%), febrile neutropenia (10.3%), and fatigue (10.3%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. ConclusionsIn this Phase 2 KSCC 1602 trial of bevacizumab plus FTD/TPI, the primary endpoint of PFS was achieved. This combination therapy showed favorable survival outcomes with an acceptable safety profile for elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Clinical trial identificationUMIN000025241. Legal entity responsible for the studyKyushu Study group of Clinical Cancer. FundingTaho Pharmaceutical. DisclosureA. Makiyama: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lily Pharmaceutical; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharmaceutical; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharmaceutical; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda Pharmaceutical. M. Kotaka: Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsya; Honoraria (self): Chugai pharmaceutical. H. Baba: Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai pharmaceutical. M. Mori: Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

602P - Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept + FOLFIRI for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OZONE secondary analyses

BackgroundFor patients with mCRC that have failed a first-line oxaliplatin-based regimen, the preferred treatment option is an irinotecan-based regimen. In these secondary analyses of the OZONE study, aflibercept + FOLFIRI safety and efficacy was evaluated for sub-populations of patients with mCRC. MethodsOZONE is a prospective, multicentre, observational, non-comparative study evaluating patients receiving aflibercept + FOLFIRI in the clinical setting, for 24 months from aflibercept initiation or until death. Patients were grouped according to: age (≥ 65 years vs<65 years); renal (CrCl ≤ 80mL/min) or hepatic (bilirubin > UNL or AST/ALT > 1.5 UNL) impairment; number and type of prior anti-cancer therapy. ResultsFrom the overall population (N=766), there were 370 patients aged ≥ 65 years. All grade asthenia (43.5% vs 35.9%) and decreased appetite (25.4% vs 20.2%) occurred more frequently (≥ 5%) in patients aged ≥ 65 vs<65 years. There were 256 patients with CrCl ≤ 80mL/min, of which 43 had CrCl < 50mL/min. Renal function did not influence treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 76.7%, 67.1% and 67.9% of patients with CrCl < 50mL/min, CrCl 50–80mL/min, and CrCl > 80mL/min, respectively. There were 129 patients with impaired liver function. All grade constipation and haemorrhage were more frequent in patients with impaired liver function vs those without (23.3% vs 14.2% and 37.2% vs 30.1%, respectively). There were 449 patients previously treated with bevacizumab. Only fatigue occurred more frequently in patients with prior bevacizumab vs those without (23.8% vs 17.0%). Efficacy multivariate analyses showed that treatment with aflibercept + FOLFIRI favoured patients without vs with hepatic impairment (median overall survival [OS] 13.7 vs 8.7 months; p<0.001) and without vs with prior use of bevacizumab (median OS 16.6 vs 10.6 months; p<0.001). ConclusionsSubgroup analyses of the OZONE study did not reveal major differences in the safety profile according to age, renal or hepatic status, or prior bevacizumab status. These results suggest that aflibercept may be a treatment option for these subgroups of patients. Funding: Sanofi. Clinical trial identificationENCEPP/SDPP/4836. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingSanofi. DisclosureI. Chau: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Eli-Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol Meyers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Five Prime Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Oncologie International; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Research grant / Funding (self): Janssen-Cilag; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi Oncology. P. García-Alfonso: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol Meyers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi Oncology; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. Z. Linke: Advisory / Consultancy, Advisory Board- Oncologic days in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2016, 2017, 2018 and Prague in 2018.: Sanofi; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Lecture- Prague Onco 2019: Merck; Non-remunerated activity/ies, ESMO 2017: Roche. A. Ruiz-Casado: Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (self): Servier; Research grant / Funding (self): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck; Research grant / Funding (self): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): Medtronic; Research grant / Funding (self): BTG. E. Polo Marques: Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck. T. Cartwright: Research grant / Funding (self): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (self): Taiho. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Prognosis of microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair deficiency stage III colon cancer patients after disease recurrence following adjuvant treatment: results of an ACCENT pooled analysis of seven studies

BackgroundMicrosatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancers have been reported to have a poor prognosis. Frequent co-occurrence of MSI/dMMR and BRAFV600E complicates the association. Patients and methodsPatients with resected stage III colon cancer (CC) from seven adjuvant studies with available data for disease recurrence and MMR and BRAFV600E status were analyzed. The primary end point was survival after recurrence (SAR). Associations of markers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, performance status, T stage, N stage, primary tumor location, grade, KRAS status, and timing of recurrence. ResultsAmong 2630 patients with cancer recurrence (1491 men [56.7%], mean age, 58.5 [19–85] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients with MSI/dMMR tumors had significantly longer SAR than did patients with microsatellite stable/proficient MMR tumors (MSS/pMMR) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.69–0.98; P = 0.029). This finding remained when looking at patients treated with standard oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens only (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58–1.00; P = 0.048). Same trends for SAR were observed when analyzing MSI/dMMR versus MSS/pMMR tumor subgroups lacking BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.84; P = 0.10) or those harboring BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.88; P = 0.43), without reaching statistical significance. Furthermore, SAR was significantly shorter in tumors with BRAFV600E versus those lacking this mutation (aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.73–2.46; P < 0.0001), even in the subgroup of MSI/dMMR tumors (aHR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.67–4.21; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with a shorter SAR were as follows: older age, male gender, T4/N2, proximal primary tumor location, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and early recurrence. ConclusionsIn stage III CC patients recurring after adjuvant chemotherapy, and before the era of immunotherapy, the MSI/dMMR phenotype was associated with a better SAR compared with MSS/pMMR. BRAFV600E mutation was a poor prognostic factor for both MSI/dMMR and MSS/pMMR patients. Trial identification numbersNCT00079274, NCT00265811, NCT00004931, NCT00004931, NCT00026273, NCT00096278, NCT00112918.

Metformin reduces c-Fos and ATF3 expression in the dorsal root ganglia and protects against oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy in mice

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum drug commonly used as the first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin-based anticancer regimens course with dose-limiting neurotoxicity. The pharmacological strategies used to manage such side effect are not totally effective. Metformin is an anti-diabetic drug that is described to negatively modulate painful diabetic neuropathy. Then, this study aimed to assess the effect of metformin in the oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy in mice. For that purpose, Swiss male mice were injected with oxaliplatin (1, 2 or 4 mg/kg, i.v., twice a week with a total of nine injections) alone or in combination with daily administration of metformin (250 mg/kg, p.o.). Thermal and mechanical nociceptive tests were performed once a week for five weeks. Then, the animals were euthanized on day 35 post-first injection of oxaliplatin and the dorsal root ganglia were harvested for the assessment of c-Fos and ATF3 expressions. Oxaliplatin caused a nociceptive response accompanied by the increased expression of c-Fos and ATF3 in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord. In addition, the oxaliplatin-associated nociception was significantly attenuated by metformin (P < 0.05), which also reduced the expression of c-Fos and ATF3 (P < 0.05). Therefore, metformin protected from the peripheral sensory neuropathy induced by oxaliplatin, which was confirmed by the reduction of c-Fos and ATF3 expression, two known neuronal activation and damage markers, respectively.

P-157 - Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/Aflibercept (FA) in an elderly population with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after the failure of an oxaliplatin-based regimen

P-157 - Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/Aflibercept (FA) in an elderly population with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after the failure of an oxaliplatin-based regimen

Effects of compound porcine cerebroside and ganglioside on neurotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin chemotherapy: preliminary results.

Oxaliplatin has shown good anti-tumour activity in the treatment of tumours involving the digestive system. However, its application is limited because of severe neurotoxicity in some patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether compound porcine cerebroside and ganglioside (CPCG) can reduce or prevent oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Patients with digestive system tumour who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were retrospectively divided into experimental and control groups according to the receipt of CPCG during chemotherapy. Adverse events at the end of each chemotherapy cycle were recorded. We compared the incidence of neurotoxicity between the two groups and graded the neurotoxicity symptoms using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The study included 115 patients (experimental group, 57; control group, 58). The number of chemotherapy cycles (6.65 vs. 6.41, p=0.540) and oxaliplatin dose (775.92 mg/m2 vs. 724.20 mg/m2, p=0.250) were comparable between the two groups. All patients developed grade 1 to 3 neurotoxicity; grade 4-5 neurotoxicity was not observed. The incidence of neurotoxicity and the probability of advanced neurotoxicity were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0.05). After a 6 to 18 months follow-up, the two groups showed no significant differences in the chemotherapy response and recurrence rate (p=0.846). CPCG reduces oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity without reducing the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based regimens; thus, it can be used for preventing oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity in patients with cancer.

Multicenter phase II study of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (JSWOG-C3 study)

BackgroundTriweekly capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) was not a replacement for fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) because of the potential for greater toxicity. Recently, it has reported that mCAPIRI is well tolerated and non-inferior to FOLFIRI. In this study, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC with reduced toxicity and preserved efficacy.MethodsPatients with mCRC who had received prior chemotherapy, including oxaliplatin-based regimens, were eligible for this study. The treatment protocol administered capecitabine at 1000 mg/m2 twice daily from the evening of day 1 to the morning of day 8, intravenous irinotecan at 150 mg/m2 on day 1, and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg on day 1 every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints for this study were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, response rate (RR), and disease control rate (DCR).ResultsFifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.23–7.40 months], and median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.57–20.23 months). The RR was 14.6% (95% CI 6.5–28.4%), and the DCR was 66.7% (95% CI 51.5–79.2%). Hypertension was the most common Grade 3 adverse event (27.5%), followed by neutropenia (17.6%). Only two patients suffered from grade 3 hand–foot syndrome.ConclusionsIn mCRC patients, biweekly CAPIRI + bevacizumab appears effective and feasible as a second-line chemotherapy with relatively low toxicities, and has potential as a useful substitute for FOLFIRI + bevacizumab.

Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction: Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.

TPS4144 Background: The majority of patients (pts) with gastroesophageal cancer present with inoperable or metastatic disease and there is a strong need for efficient and tolerable first-line (1L) treatment. Oxaliplatin-based regimens like FOLFOX have become one standard of care. However, median survival is still below 12 months. Results from trials using nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment of subjects with advanced/metastatic GC and GEJ cancers demonstrated clinical activity, in pts whose tumors did or did not express PD-L1; in addition, nivolumab alone and in combination with ipilimumab demonstrated clinical benefits in various other tumor types. Based on this clinical experience, the AIO-STO-0417 trial (Moonlight) has been designed to evaluate the combination of chemotherapy with two checkpoint inhibitors in first-line therapy of pts with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated phase II trial. Pts with Her2-negative, inoperable, advanced or metastatic gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer will be randomized 1:1 to 1L treatment with FOLFOX (Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; Leucovorin 400 mg/m²; 5FU 400 mg/m² on d1 of each treatment cycle and 5FU 1200 mg/m² continuous infusion over 24 hrs d1 and d2) every 2 weeks plus Nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and Ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks (Arm A) or FOLFOX alone (Arm B). Primary endpoint of the trial is progression-free survival based on the ITT population. Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, Safety and Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). 118 pts (59 per arm) will be enrolled to provide 80% power for detecting an average HR of 0.68 using the log rank test at a one-sided type I error of 10%. At the date of submission, (Feb 2019), 28 of planned 118 pts are randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03647969.

Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) in advanced well-differentiated digestive neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter national retrospective study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors (GTE).

4104 Background: Oxaliplatin-based regimens have shown promising antitumor activity in digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), however the available data are limited. Our aim was to assess the tumor response and survival in a large series of patients treated with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) for advanced digestive NETs.Oxaliplatin-based regimens have shown promising antitumor activity in digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), however the available data are limited. Our aim was to assess the tumor response and survival in a large series of patients treated with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) for advanced digestive NETs. Methods: All patients with advanced well-differentiated digestive NETs treated with at least 3 cycles of FOLFOX between 2004 and 2018 in 12 centers of the French GTE, were retrospectively included. Best response according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The prognostic factors for PFS were investigated by multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model including variables with a p value ⩽ 0.20 in univariate analysis. Results: One hundred and forty-nine patients were included. Primary tumor location was pancreas (n = 88), small intestine (n = 37), stomach (n = 7), rectum (n = 4) and unknown without lung tumor at CT scan (n = 13). Partial response rate was of 31% for pancreatic NETs, 13% for small intestine NETs, 14% for gastric NETs, 25% for rectal NETs and 38% for unknown primary NETs. Median PFS were, respectively, 9, 9, 14, 4 and 6 months, and median OS were 30, 28, 31, 25 and 15 months. Significant poor prognostic factors for PFS after FOLFOX in digestive NETs were: progressive disease (HR = 2.5, p = 0.018), hepatic involvement &gt; 50% (HR = 1.8, p = 0.009), prior targeted therapy (HR = 1.5, p = 0.048) and rectal primary tumor (HR = 4.2, p = 0.01). Among pancreatic NETs, the 9 insulinomas had a 22 months PFS versus 9 months for the others (p = 0.025), and serum glucose normalization was obtained in 8 out of 9 cases. Conclusions: FOLFOX has a promising clinical activity for gastroenteropancreatic NETs, especially in insulinomas.

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter, phase II clinical trial.

3548 Background: Elderly patients are often intolerable in combination of cytotoxic agents. Recently, Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab has been shown as good candidate for the vulnerable patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients aged 70 years and older with previously untreated, unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer, who were not deemed to be candidates for oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimens, were included in this trial. Treatment consisted of trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m2 orally a day on day 1-5 and day 8-12) with bevacizumab (5mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and day 15), given every 4 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were response rate (ORR), Overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Between 2017 January and 2018 March, 39 patients were enrolled in this study. The characteristics of patients were male/female : 17/22, median age : 77.5 (range: 70-88) and PS: 0/1 : 31/8. The ORR of 37 patients were assessed by the central review committee. The best response was 40.5(15/37) % (95% CI: 24.8-57.9), and the disease control rate was 86.5 (32/37) % (95% CI: 71.2–95.5). The AEs which were frequent as grade 3 or 4 were leucopenia (71.8 %), neutropenia (48.7 %), anorexia (12.8 %), febrile neutropenia (10.3 %) and fatigue (10.3 %). No treatment related death was reported. Conclusions: The combination of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Hematological adverse events were need for caution. The primary endpoint of PFS will be presented in the end of this year. Clinical trial information: UMIN000025241.

Aflibercept Plus FOLFIRI for Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Observations from the Global Aflibercept Safety and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Program (ASQoP)

BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety profile of aflibercept and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) provided with aflibercept access before marketing authorization. Patients and MethodsPatients received aflibercept followed by FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) on day 1 of a 2-week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or patient/investigator decision to discontinue. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated, and HRQL was assessed at baseline, cycle 3, and every other cycle using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-CR29, and EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels questionnaires (NCT01571284). ResultsOverall, 779 adult patients with mCRC, who received ≥ 1 prior oxaliplatin-based regimen and had disease progression during or following their last administration of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, were enrolled. At data cutoff, all patients had discontinued treatment, mainly owing to disease progression (51.7%). The most common TEAEs of any grade were diarrhea (61.6%), hypertension (48.4%), and nausea (43.3%). The most common grade 3/4 TEAEs were hypertension (24.1%), neutropenia (23.1%), and diarrhea (15.3%). Clinically meaningful changes in HRQL were reported for all measures. Most patients either had an improvement in their HRQL scores or remained stable during the treatment period based on patient-reported outcomes. ConclusionThe data from this study support the tolerability of the combination of aflibercept and FOLFIRI in a setting that more closely approximates real life in patients with mCRC who failed to respond to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and also suggest an improvement in HRQL.

Effects of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy on short-term survival of patients with colon cancer in Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been applied as standard treatment for high risk stages II and III colon cancer in many countries. There was no comprehensive report of oxaliplatin use in Indonesia. This research aimed to evaluate the short-term survival of patients with colon cancer treated with such strategy and the prognostic factors. Medical records of patients with colon cancer receiving oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Demography, clinicopathological, and treatment data were collected. Two-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and survival predictors were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Data of 81 patients had been included with a median follow-up of 25.2 months. The estimated OS and DFS at 2 years were 75.8% and 72.7%. In multivariate analyses, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2 performance status [hazard ratio (HR) =2.967; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.265 to 6.957; P=0.012], T4 stage (HR =2.669; 95% CI, 1.087 to 6.557; P=0.032), and less cycles of chemotherapy administration (HR =3.280; 95% CI, 1.333 to 8.070; P=0.010) were significant independent factors for an increased risk of death. Cases with moderately to poorly differentiated tumors had significantly worse DFS compared with those with well differentiated tumors (HR =3.503; 95% CI, 1.403 to 8.744; P=0.007). Colon cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant regimens in our clinical practice had 2-year OS rate of 75.8% and 2-year DFS rate of 72.7%. ECOG 2 performance status, T4 stage, and less cycles of chemotherapy administration significantly predicted a poor OS and moderately to poorly histological grade significantly predicted a poor DFS.

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: chemotherapy, molecular-targeting therapy and immunotherapy.

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) mainly consists of cytotoxic agents, aiming to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil have been considered standard treatment for several decades. Efforts to develop more effective treatment have led to clinical trials testing triplet, irinotecan-based, oxaliplatin-based and paclitaxel-based regimens. Molecular-targeting agents, mainly anti-EGFR inhibitors including gefitinib, panitumumab and nimotuzumab, have been investigated; however, no molecular-targeting agents demonstrate the clinical utility in Phase 3 trials so far. Negative results from Phase 3 trials testing gefitinib and panitumumab suggest the importance of identifying predictive biomarkers of responses to molecular-targeting agents. On the basis of results from Phase 3 trials testing PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are anticipated to be the standard treatment for patients with ESCC. Dual immune checkpoint inhibition and immunotherapy in combination with cytotoxic agents are under study. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies provide comprehensive catalogues of genetic alterations in ESCC which may lead to therapeutic breakthroughs in a personalized manner. Here, we review the existing clinical data and discuss future perspectives with a focus on the systemic treatment of advanced ESCC.

A randomized phase III trial of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) versus UFT/leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage III colon cancer: The ACTS-CC 02 trial.

484 Background: The ACTS-CC 02 trial was designed to verify the superiority of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) over UFT/leucovorin (LV), one of the standard oral fluoropyrimidine regimens in Japan, in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients (pts) with high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries). The results of the safety analysis have been reported previously (Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2018). We now present the 3-year DFS results as the primary endpoint. Methods: Pts who underwent curative resection for pathologically confirmed high-risk stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300–600 mg/day of UFT according to body surface area [BSA] and 75 mg/day of LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 courses) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80–120 mg/day of S-1 according to BSA on days 1-14, every 21 days, 8 courses). The primary endpoint was DFS. Results: From April 2010 through October 2014, a total of 966 pts were enrolled at 260 institutions. The full analysis set, excluding pts who withdrew informed consent before protocol treatment, comprised 478 and 477 pts in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively. The median age was 65.0 years. The ECOG PS was 0 in 94.0%, and the disease stage was IIIA/IIIB/IIIC in 1.3%/50.2%/48.6%. The 3-year DFS rate was 60.6% in the UFT/LV group and 62.7% in the SOX group (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.74-1.09; p = 0.28); the superiority of SOX was not demonstrated. In stage IIIB, the 3-year DFS rate was 69.3% and 68.5% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.74-1.37; p = 0.95). In Stage IIIC, the 3-year DFS rate was 50.6% and 55.8% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.63-1.06; p = 0.12). Notably, in the N2b subgroup, the 3-year DFS rate was 46.0% and 54.7% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.55-1.05; p = 0.10). Conclusions: SOX was not shown to be superior to UFT/LV in pts with high-risk stage III colon cancer. However, the oxaliplatin-based regimen was suggested to be more effective in advanced disease, such as stage IIIC and N2b. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-101073.

Impact of cardiac comorbidity on use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) for colorectal cancer (CRC): A real-world population-based study.

491 Background: Cardiac comorbidities such as myocardial infarction (MI) and congestive heart failure (CHF) may pose challenges in the treatment of CRC. As the population ages, cancer patients (pts) will be increasingly affected by cardiac comorbidities. We performed a population-based analysis of CRC to evaluate the prevalence of MI and CHF, use of ADJ, and survival outcomes. Methods: We evaluated 8601 pts diagnosed with resected stage 2 or 3 CRC from 2004 to 2015 in Alberta, Canada. Baseline patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared between those with and without MI or CHF. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models. Results: In total, 506 (5.9%) patients (pts) had MI and 440 (5.1%) had CHF. CRC patients with prior MI or CHF were older (median 76 and 79 years, respectively) and had worse Charlson Comorbidity Index (median CCI 2 for both) than those without cardiac comorbidities (median age 67 and CCI 0) (p &lt; 0.001). Only 24% and 15% of pts with a MI or CHF history, respectively, received ADJ when compared to their counterparts (52% and 53%, respectively, p &lt; 0.001). Among those who received ADJ (N = 3409), an oxaliplatin-based regimen was used in 26% of MI pts versus 42% of those without MI (p = 0.002), and in 31% of CHF pts versus 42% of those without CHF. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly worse overall survival (OS) in pts with prior MI (9.1 vs 4.3 years, p &lt; 0.001) or CHF (9.2 vs. 2.7 years, p &lt; 0.001) when compared to those without. However, cancer-specific survival (CSS) was not statistically different with or without MI (p = 0.348) and with or without CHF (p = 0.611). In Cox regression that adjusted for use of ADJ, MI was no longer a significant predictor of OS (HR = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.15), but CHF remained significant (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.57-0.74). Neither MI nor CHF were predictors of CSS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98-1.33, and HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77-1.15). Conclusions: CRC pts with MI or CHF experienced lower use of ADJ and worse OS, but no difference in CSS was observed. ADJ-treated pts with prior MI appeared to benefit while worse outcomes in pts with prior CHF appear to be driven by non-cancer related causes.

MACC1 expression as a candidate prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin-based therapy.

567 Background: MACC1, part of the HGF-MET pathway, drives proliferation and regulation of MET expression in vitro. In vivo, MACC1 is associated with tumor progression and studies suggest greater MACC1 expression is associated with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. We hypothesized that MACC1 may be a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: MACC1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on tumor microarrays (N = 428). Patients were stage I-III CRC who received an oxaliplatin-based regimen (either with 5-FU (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (XELOX)) within the HeCOG 6C/08 observational study. MACC1 expression was assessed by a blinded GI pathologist using a scale ranging from 0 (no staining) to 3+ (strong expression). Each patient had at least 3 samples and the strongest result was used for the final score. MACC1 positivity was defined as ≥2+ expression and 0-1+ as MACC1-. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for the association of MACC1 expression with patient characteristics, disease-free (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 400/428 CRC tumors were evaluable: 322 (80.5%) were MACC1+ and 78 (19.5%) MACC1-. Mucinous features were less likely in MACC1+ patients (24% vs. 38%, p = 0.02). Other unfavorable features including grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor mutational burden were not significantly different. There was no difference for stage, microsatellite instability, BRAF, KRAS, or NRASstatus between MACC1+/- cancers. There was a trend towards worse survival in MACC1+ patients regardless of treatment (DFS HR 1.55 [95% CI: 0.87, 2.76], OS HR 1.59 [95% CI 0.74, 3.4]). This difference was not statistically significant for OS (p = 0.26) or DFS (p = 0.08) even when stratified by clinicopathologic variables. Conclusions: Patients with MACC1+ CRC tumors who received adjuvant oxaliplatin-based therapy were less likely to have mucinous histology. They had a trend toward independently worse survival that was not significant when accounting for stage and clinicopathologic variables. Studies focused on the predictive role of MACC1 and oxaliplatin in stage III CRC are in progress.

TheraSphere Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma of the Liver: Protocol for the EPOCH Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

BackgroundColorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers and causes of cancer-related death. Up to approximately 70% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have metastases to the liver at initial diagnosis. Second-line systemic treatment in mCRC can prolong survival after development of disease progression during or after first-line treatment and in those who are intolerant to first-line treatment.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with TheraSphere yttrium-90 (90Y) glass microspheres combined with second-line therapy in patients with mCRC of the liver who had disease progression during or after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsEPOCH is an open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial being conducted at up to 100 sites in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Eligible patients have mCRC of the liver and disease progression after first-line chemotherapy with either an oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimen and are eligible for second-line chemotherapy with the alternate regimen. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the TARE group (chemotherapy with TARE in place of the second chemotherapy infusion and subsequent resumption of chemotherapy) or the control group (chemotherapy alone). The addition of targeted agents is permitted. The primary end points are progression-free survival and hepatic progression-free survival. The study objective will be considered achieved if at least one primary end point is statistically significant. Secondary end points are overall survival, time to symptomatic progression defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 2 or higher, objective response rate, disease control rate, quality-of-life assessment by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal Cancer questionnaire, and adverse events. The study is an adaptive trial, comprising a group sequential design with 2 interim analyses with a planned maximum of 420 patients. The study is designed to detect a 2.5-month increase in median progression-free survival, from 6 months in the control group to 8.5 months in the TARE group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71), and a 3.5-month increase in median hepatic progression-free survival time, from 6.5 months in the control group to 10 months in the TARE group (HR 0.65). On the basis of simulations, the power to detect the target difference in either progression-free survival or hepatic progression-free survival is >90%, and the power to detect the target difference in each end point alone is >80%.ResultsPatient enrollment ended in October 2018. The first interim analysis in June 2018 resulted in continuation of the study without any changes.ConclusionsThe EPOCH study may contribute toward the establishment of the role of combination therapy with TARE and oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of mCRC of the liver.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01483027; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01483027 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/734A6PAYW)International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR1-10.2196/11545

Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen is Superior to Cisplatin-Based Regimen in Tumour Remission as First-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: This study was initially designed to examine whether oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to cisplatin-based regimen in tumour remission as first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (GC).Methods: Literature in EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) was searched. Only phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness and safety between oxaliplatin-based and cisplatin-based regimens as first-line treatment for advanced GC were selected. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. The primary endpoints were complete remission rate (CRR), partial remission rate (PRR), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). The second endpoint was the toxicity response.Results: 2,140 patients from six phase II or III RCTs were included. Compared to cisplatin-based therapy, subjects who received oxaliplatin-based treatment had significantly higher PRR (OR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.05-1.48, P=0.01, I2=0%), ORR (OR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.44, P=0.03, I2=0%) and DCR (OR: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.31-2.38, P=0.0002, I2=25%), but not CRR (OR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.37-1.31, P=0.27, I2=0%). In addition, oxaliplatin-based therapy significantly decreased all grades of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, nausea, stomatitis, creatinine elevation and thromboembolism, as well as grades 3-4 of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia and febrile neutropenia than cisplatin-based regimen. However, oxaliplatin-based treatment strikingly increased the risk of thrombocytopenia, sensory neuropathy, diarrhea, fatigue and liver dysfunction.Conclusions: Oxaliplatin-based regimen is superior to cisplatin-based regimen in tumour remission as first-line chemotherapy for advanced GC, and is associated with less toxicity and better tolerability.