Reviewed by: Greed and Grievance: Ex-Militants’ Perspectives on the Conflict in Solomon Islands 1998–2003 by Matthew G Allen Gordon Leua Nanau Greed and Grievance: Ex-Militants’ Perspectives on the Conflict in Solomon Islands 1998–2003, by Matthew G Allen. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2013. isbn 978-0-8248-3854-6; 243 pages, maps, tables, illustrations, photographs, notes, appendixes. Cloth, us$55.00. Reading Greed and Grievance: ExMilitants’ Perspectives on the Conflict in Solomon Islands 1998–2003 by Matthew G Allen reminded me of several things. First, it reminded me of the civil uprising since 1998; the militant rule and activities then in towns and rural villages; the various attempts to attain peace, particularly through the Townsville Peace Agreement in 2000 that resulted in the cessation of overt fighting; and people’s reception of the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (ramsi) in 2003. These observed behaviors and events persuaded me to learn more about the perceptions of ex-militants in the conflict. I also wondered what these ex-militants could relay to an expatriate scholar like Allen who is attempting to make sense of the country’s social uprising. More important, I was also eager to learn from the book how this complex Melanesian conflict is perceived under the auspices of greed and grievance. My very first impression was that the book is very well arranged, rendering the lines of arguments easy to follow. The book is divided into seven chapters with detailed assessments of historical developments and background information to assist readers who might have limited knowledge pertaining to the “tensions” specifically and to Solomon Islands more generally. The author skillfully weaves the overall and often contradictory accounts by members of the two former conflicting groups into a story of failed coexistence. According to his research, Guadalcanal ex-militants subscribed to the notion of Guadal-canal as the motherland that must be saved, while the Malaita ex-militants advocated for the security of other Solomon Islanders from the threat of Guadalcanal militants. The author capably knits these distinct and contrary positions into one national story under the title “Continuities and Symmetries.” The book captures very powerful personal stories by individuals who contributed physically during the conflict. The stories of events and emotions that led these individuals to [End Page 207] commit to a process of hate, atrocities, and pillage are well captured and described by the author. For instance, the account of how one Malaita militant decided to join the fight after witnessing the humiliating and inhumane treatment of a girl and her father is sensitively expressed in the book. Similarly, the book vividly illustrates the case of a Guadalcanal youth who was convinced that the only way to free his island from exploitation by others was to join the fight. These personal revelations demonstrate the fragility of people’s intentions to remain neutral and coexist when faced with immense insecurity. Allen has done an excellent job of uncovering and rediscovering historical evidence that may have been forgotten over time. The wealth of historical detail and information he provides is reinforced in the appendixes and notes. These aid the reader’s appreciation of the sorts of arguments disclosed by ex-militants, despite obvious levels of exaggeration in some of their accounts. The author spent productive time listening to youths on both sides of the conflict and has efficaciously retold their stories in the pages of this book. Such is the hallmark of a great researcher and scholar. Gaining the trust of ex-militants in order to gather and then convey their accounts to a regional and global audience is a remarkable skill, not easily replicated. The author must be commended for an approach that successfully balanced viewpoints from former members of opposing groups. It may also be useful to highlight certain “soft spots” in the book. First is the risk that ex-militants may have misconstrued or indeed deliberately misrepresented certain matters. These could be ideas or stories that were never heard of before and may have been orchestrated to impress the expatriate researcher. A case in point is the brief history provided by two Guadalcanal ex-militants as explicated in appendix 2. For instance...
Read full abstract