Overall Survival Benefit Research Articles

Length of treatment after partial or complete remission in immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma: An EUMelaReg real world study.

9531 Background: A significant proportion of patients (pts) with non-resectable melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) achieve durable remissions, but there is limited data on the optimal duration of ICI therapy in these pts. Therefore, the influence of the duration and maintenance of ICI therapy in pts with a partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) on further outcome was investigated. Methods: Primary objectives was the survival outcome after achieving PR or CR in non-resectable stage III/IV melanoma in relation to baseline prognostic variables and duration of maintenance treatment with ICIs in 1st line. This retrospective study evaluated melanoma cases from the EUMelaReg treatment registry, who achieved a best overall response (BOR) of PR or CR with either single agent anti-PD1 or combined anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 in 1st line. Cases were stratified according to treatment duration after achieving a PR or CR: < 6 months (M), 6-12 M, > 12 M. To address immortal time bias, cases with early progression were cloned into all respectively compatible strata. These synthetical strata were further analyzed and compared by propensity score weighting, and robust confidence intervals were retrieved by bootstrapping techniques. Results: A total of 1,291 pts were included in the analysis. After cloning, 2,144 cases could be stratified to the synthetical arms of <6 M (26.5%), 6-12 M (31.4%) or >12 M (42.1%) treatment continuation after achieving PR or CR. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that treatment until progressive disease (PD) or > 12 M after remission resulted in prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the < 6 M arm (hazard ratio (HR): 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.6-0.9] and HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.5-0.9], respectively).This effect was more pronounced in PR (HR 0.66 for OS) than in (HR 0.84 for OS). Treatment for 6-12 M compared to < 6 M also showed a trend towards prolonged PFS and OS (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.7-1.1] and HR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.6-1.1], respectively). Conclusions: This study showed PFS and OS benefit for pts continuing on treatment for > 12 M or until progression after achieving PR or CR compared to pts treated for < 6 M. [Table: see text]

A randomised phase 2 study of liposomal irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxalipalatin versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

4141 Background: FOLFIRINOX remained as first-line standard of care. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery. Liposomal irinotecan (HE072) is a liposomal formulation that encapsulates irinotecan in a lipid bilayer vesicle, as a generic drug, had been approved for marketing in China on September 15, 2022, and was used in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who progressed after receiving gemcitabine treatment. This study aims to compare with nab-paclitaxel+gemcitabine (AG), which is another first-line stand of care, through substitute HE072 for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective delivery. Methods: HE072-CSP-004 was a randomised, open-label, multi-center, phase 2 study. Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive NALIRIFOX (HE072 50 mg/m², oxaliplatin 60 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m², administered sequentially as a continuous intravenous infusion over 46 h) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m²), administered intravenously, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Other key eligibility criteria include ECOG performance status of 0 to 1, untreated with systematic anti-tumor regimens; Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and duration of response (DOR). Results: As of Dec 12, 2023, 117 patients were randomly assigned (NALIRIFOX, 78; AG, 39). The two groups were comparable on baseline characteristics. The median PFS differences was statistically significant as 7.6 months (95%CI 5.49-9.17) with NALIRIFOX versus 3.7 months (95%CI 3.15-5.06) with AG (hazard ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.34-0.87; p=0.0104). Median OS was 13.4 months (95%CI 9.89-NE) with NALIRIFOX versus 8.8 months (95%CI 6.87-12.16) with AG (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.39-1.11; p=0.1125). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 52 (66.7%) of 78 patients receiving NALIRIFOX and 30 (76.9%) of 39 patients receiving AG. No new safety signal was observed. Conclusions: The study met the primary endpoint of PFS demonstrating statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and with a trend of OS benefit for NALIRIFOX over AG. The safety profile was consistent with the known risks of the individual toxicity. This study is consistent with the existing NAPOLI 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT05047991 .

A plasma-based proteomic platform for predicting clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in multiple cancers.

2568 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies are preferred treatment options for multiple cancer types. However, there is an unmet need for predictive tests that can identify patients likely to benefit. PROphet-NSCLC is a commercially available pretreatment plasma proteomic test that predicts clinical benefit from first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitor-based therapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), guiding the choice between ICI monotherapy versus ICI-chemotherapy. Here, we evaluate the broader clinical utility of PROphet-NSCLC by testing its predictive capabilities across diverse cancer types. Methods: Pre-treatment plasma samples and clinical data were collected for an observational study from patients with metastatic melanoma (n=68) and HPV-related cancers (n=43; NCT03427411) treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitor-based therapies. HPV-related cancers included anogenital squamous cell carcinoma (n=16), cervical carcinoma (n=18), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n=9). Patients were assigned a PROphet-positive or -negative result based on computational analysis of SomaScan-derived proteomic profiles in pre-treatment plasma samples. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in PROphet-positive- and -negative groups was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated from univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results: In the melanoma cohort, PROphet-positive patients (n=51) displayed a significant OS benefit in comparison to PROphet-negative patients (n=17; median OS 92.8 months vs. 9.5 months, HR=0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.34, p<0.0001), consistent with the clinically validated predictive performance of the test in patients with NSCLC. OS results remained significant after correcting for sex, age, histology, ECOG performance status, and treatment type (HR=0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.25, p<0.001). In PROphet-positive patients, PD-1+CTLA-4 inhibitor combination therapy (n=27) was superior to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (n=24; OS: median 118.4 vs. 48.3 months, HR=0.58, p=0.24; PFS: median not reached vs. 10.8 months, HR=0.48, p=0.04). PROphet-negative patients displayed similarly poor outcomes with either treatment, providing a rationale to consider alternative therapies for such patients. In the HPV-related cohort, the median OS in PROphet-positive (n=10) vs PROphet-negative (n=33) groups was 43.6 vs 4.4 months (HR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, p=0.001), with similar trends per sub-cohort. Conclusions: Our findings show that the PROphet-NSCLC test can be applied to PD-(L)1 inhibitor-treated melanoma and HPV-related cancers, suggesting applicability to cancers beyond NSCLC. Analysis of additional patient samples is needed to explore the potential utility of PROphet-NSCLC for informing treatment decisions for a broad range of cancer types.

The efficacy and safety study of thymosin α1 combined with PD-1 antibodies as adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk recurrence factors after radical resection.

e16226 Background: Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy has revolutionized unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. The efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy (PAT) using anti-PD-1 in treating HCC is currently the subject of extensive research. This study explored the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with thymosin alpha-1 (Tα1) for patients with HCC and high-risk recurrent factors (HRRFs) post-hepatectomy. Methods: Data from 273 patients with HCC and HRRFs who underwent hepatectomy at Tongji Hospital (January 2019 to July 2022) were prospectively collected. Patients were nonrandomly divided into Tα1+ anti-PD-1 antibodies (65, 23.8%), anti-PD-1 antibodies (84, 30.8%), and control (no adjuvant therapy, 124, 45.4%) groups based on finances and willingness. After propensity score matching (PSM), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Cox regression analysis identified the RFS- and OS-related prognostic factors, followed by subgroup analysis. Results: After PSM, 65 patients were matched. The anti-PD-1 antibodies + Tα1 group exhibited longer RFS than the anti-PD-1 antibodies (P = 0.014) and control (P < 0.0001) groups. The anti-PD-1 antibodies group had longer RFS than the control group (P < 0.0001). The anti-PD-1 antibodies + Tα1 (P = 0.00049) and anti-PD-1 antibodies groups (P = 0.0041) demonstrated longer OS than the control group. The 1- and 2-year RFS rates in the Tα1 + anti-PD-1 antibodies, anti-PD-1 antibodies, and control groups were 98.4%, 86.2%, and 49.2% (P < 0.001), and 80.2%, 65.8%, and 24.6% (P < 0.001), respectively. The corresponding 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 100.0%, 100.0%, and 84.6% (P < 0.001), 98.0%, 91.4%, and 69.0% (P < 0.001), and 91.3%, 86.8%, and 57.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariable analyses suggested that the Tα1 + anti-PD-1 antibodies treatment improved the RFS and OS more than the non-anti-PD-1 antibodies + Tα1 treatment (hazard ratio (HR): 0.174, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.089–0.340, P < 0.001 and HR: 0.240, 95% CI: 0.084–0.683, P = 0.008, respectively). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant RFS and OS benefits for patients with HCC and vascular invasion treated with Tα1 + anti-PD-1 antibodies. Grade 1 and 2 toxicities included rash/pruritus (21.5%), diarrhea (18.5%), and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP)(15.4%). Grade 3 toxicities included RCCEP (1.5%), diarrhea (1.5%), rash/pruritus (0.8%), edema (0.8%), hepatitis (0.8%), nausea/vomiting (0.8%), and hypothyroidism (0.8%). No grade 4/5 toxicities or severe adverse events were detected. Conclusions: Combining anti-PD-1 antibodies with Tα1 as adjuvant therapy is safe, improving postoperative prognosis in patients with HCC and HRRFs after hepatectomy, proving more effective than anti-PD-1 antibodies alone.

Long-term follow up for adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma: Final results of the COMBI-AD study.

9500 Background: Dabrafenib plus trametinib, a standard-of care adjuvant treatment for patients with BRAF-mutated AJCC-stage III melanoma, has significantly improved the primary endpoint, relapse-free survival (RFS). Further to published interim assessments, we present updated and final results for RFS, distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: In the COMBI-AD phase 3 study, patients received dabrafenib (150 mg BD) plus trametinib (2 mg OD; n=438) or matching placebos (n=432). Treatment continued for up to 12 months or until disease relapse, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. OS, RFS, and DMFS were summarized using Kaplan–Meier estimates. OS was compared between study arms using stratified log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using Pike estimator. Safety data were summarized descriptively. Results: At final analysis, median duration of follow up was 100.0 months in the treatment arm and 82.5 months in the placebo arm. Median OS was not attained in the two arms (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.01; P=0.063). Consistent OS benefits were seen across most prespecified subgroups including patients with BRAFV600E mutation (n=397; HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.96). Estimated RFS (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.63) and DMFS (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.71) favored the dabrafenib plus trametinib arm. In both arms, patients received salvage immunotherapies (29% each) and targeted therapy (21% vs. 37% for treatment and placebo arms, respectively). Safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Conclusions: COMBI-AD presents the longest follow-up data (over 10 years) in adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma in the modern era. OS was improved with dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with a 20% risk reduction for death. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Consistent with published results at 3 and 5 years, RFS and DMFS were more favorable in the treatment vs. placebo arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083 . [Table: see text]

Seasonal patterns in immunotherapy outcomes.

e14684 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) allow the immune system to target cancer cells. The immune system is affected by seasonal factors e.g. viruses, allergens, vaccines and ultraviolet exposure. There is evidence that some immune-related adverse events are more common in winter and that higher vitamin D (VD) levels and VD supplementation are associated with longer overall survival (OS). This study aimed to determine if season of ICI initiation was associated with OS. Methods: We evaluated patients who received ICI treatment at The Christie Hospital, UK, between 2017 and 2022. Season of ICI initiation was categorised as: (i) Nov-Apr vs May-Oct and (ii) Dec-Feb vs Jun-Aug (i.e. winter vs summer). For each category, median OS (mOS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals for associations of season of ICI initiation with OS and to test for interactions with ICI and diagnosis. Where data were available, associations of baseline VD levels and VD supplements with OS were estimated along with the association between season of ICI initiation and OS in patients with normal VD and/or receiving VD supplements. Results: 3010 patients were included and 1804 OS events occurred during 36.4 months [m] median follow-up. ICI indications included pembrolizumab or atezolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 1st line n 304, median OS [mOS] 17.0 m; 2nd line n 197, mOS 10.7 m), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC (n 288, mOS 16.3 m), pembrolizumab or nivolumab for melanoma (advanced n 211, mOS 25.2 m; adjuvant n 226, mOS not reached), and ipilimumab + nivolumab for melanoma (n 203, mOS 45.4 m) or renal cancer (n 129, mOS 38.6 m). Confounders were balanced across seasons of ICI initiation, including sex (48% Nov-Apr vs 52% May-Oct), age (median 66.7 vs 67.2 years), PS 0/1 (83% vs 84%), body mass index (median 26.0 vs 25.7 kg/m2) and setting (adjuvant 13.0% vs advanced 12.4%). Season of ICI initiation was not associated with OS (Nov to Apr vs May to Oct mOS 20.8 vs 20.5 m, HR 1.01, 0.92-1.11; Dec-Feb vs Jun-Aug mOS 20.0 vs 21.3 m, HR 0.97, 0.85-1.10). Interactions with ICI and diagnosis were not significant. 214 patients had baseline VD levels and 96 received VD supplements before ICI initiation. VD deficiency was highest in February (23.6%) and lowest in August (1.1%). Among 209 patients with normal VD levels or receiving VD supplements, season of initiation was not associated with OS (Nov to Apr vs May to Oct mOS 45.4 vs 43.4 m; HR 0.98, 0.63-1.53). However, VD deficiency (n 37) was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.06, 1.21-3.52) and VD supplementation with longer OS (HR 0.69, 0.52-0.92). Conclusions: While VD deficiency and VD supplementation were associated with OS, season of ICI initiation was not. These results provide reassurance the OS benefits of ICIs remain similar irrespective of time of year of initiation despite seasonal factors that may influence the immune system.

Current management practices of de novo oligometastatic breast cancer: Real-world data from a physician survey.

1104 Background: De novo oligometastatic breast cancer (oligo-mBC) is generally defined as < 5 lesions at the time of diagnosis and represent a steadily increasing subset of metastatic cancers. Several retrospective studies demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) for select patients with oligo-mBC when treated with multimodality therapy (chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation). However, randomized trials that tested surgical resection of the primary tumor, or radiation of oligometastases (including recurrent and de novo disease) showed no OS benefit. No randomized trials to date have tested all 3 treatment modalities combined (as used with curative intent in early-stage disease). Current NCCN guidelines do not include specific recommendations for de novo oligo-mBC, the St Gallen International guidelines allow multimodality therapy for carefully selected patients. We surveyed practicing medical oncologists through the ASCO survey pool regarding their use of multimodality therapy in de novo oligo-mBC. Methods: An online survey was sent to the ASCO Research survey pool (N=999) between 11/14/23 – 12/29/23, 193 ASCO members completed the survey. Data was confidential and anonymous. Results: The majority (76-79%) of respondents recommend starting with palliative systemic chemotherapy. If patients have a response to initial chemotherapy, 42-54% recommend ablative radiation to all residual lesions, and 38-52% recommended surgical resection of the primary tumor. Overall, multimodality therapy is recommended sometimes by 29-36%, often by 19-29%, almost never by 32-41%, and never by 2-7% of respondents. Recommendations varied by disease subtype (Table). Conclusions: These survey data indicate varied practices in the treatment of de novo oligo-mBC. This highlights the need for future randomized clinical trials to investigate whether there may be survival benefit by receptor subtype in de novo oligo-mBC treated with curative intent multimodality therapy as used in locally advanced cancers. [Table: see text]

Avelumab first-line maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma: Complete screening for prognostic and predictive factors using machine learning in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial.

Avelumab first-line (1 L) maintenance is a standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) based on the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, which showed that avelumab 1 L maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs BSC alone in patients who were progression free after receiving 1 L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Here, we comprehensively screened JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial datasets to identify prognostic factors that define subpopulations of patients with longer or shorter OS irrespective of treatment, and predictive factors that select patients who could obtain a greater OS benefit from avelumab 1 L maintenance treatment. We performed machine learning analyses to screen a large set of baseline covariates, including patient demographics, disease characteristics, laboratory values, molecular biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes. Covariates were identified from previously reported analyses and established prognostic and predictive markers. Variables selected from random survival forest models were processed further in univariate Cox models with treatment interaction and visually inspected using correlation analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results were summarized in a multivariable Cox model. Prognostic baseline covariates associated with OS included in the final model were assignment to avelumab 1 L maintenance treatment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, site of metastasis, sum of longest target lesion diameters, levels of C-reactive protein and alkaline phosphatase in blood, lymphocyte proportion in intratumoral stroma, tumor mutational burden, and tumor CD8+ T-cell infiltration. Potential predictive factors included site of metastasis, tumor mutation burden, and tumor CD8+ T-cell infiltration. An analysis in patients with PD-L1+ tumors had similar findings to those in the overall population. Machine learning analyses of data from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial identified potential prognostic and predictive factors for avelumab 1 L maintenance treatment in patients with aUC, which warrant further evaluation in other clinical datasets.

Long-term survival outcomes of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) treated with brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) in ZUMA-3.

6531 Background: Brexu-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for pts ≥18 y with R/R B-ALL in the US (≥26 y in the EU). In the 3-y follow-up of ZUMA-3, median overall survival (OS) was 25.6 mo (N=78). Survival benefit was seen regardless of age, prior treatment, or subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant (sub alloSCT) status (Shah et al. ASCO 2023. #7023). Here we report 4-y survival outcomes for ZUMA-3. Methods: Eligible pts (≥18 y) had R/R B-ALL and received brexu-cel (1×106 CAR T cells/kg) after leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate per independent review with OS as a key secondary endpoint. Descriptive statistics are reported for post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses. Results: As of July 23, 2023, median follow-up time in Phase 1 and 2 pts who received the pivotal dose of brexu-cel (N=78) was 53.6 mo (range 44.7-82.3). Median OS (95% CI) was 25.6 mo (16.2-60.4) in all treated pts and 47.0 mo (23.2-not estimable [NE]) in pts with CR/CRi (n=57). In pts <26 y (n=15), median OS (95% CI) was 23.2 mo (9.0-NE) and was 26.0 mo (15.9-NE) in pts ≥26 y (n=63). Median OS (95% CI) in pts with 1 prior therapy (n=15) was 60.4 mo (7.6-NE) and was 25.4 mo (15.9-47.0) in pts with ≥2 prior therapies (n=63). Medians for OS (95% CI) in pts with (n=38) and without (n=40) prior blinatumomab (blina) were 15.9 (8.3-26.0) and 60.4 mo (18.6-NE), respectively. Median OS (95% CI) was 36.3 mo (10.2-NE) in responders who went on to sub alloSCT (n=14) and 60.4 mo (23.2-NE) in those who did not (n=43). The 48-mo OS rate was 40% (95% CI, 28-52) in all pts but appeared lower in pts with prior blina (24%; Table). No new adverse events or deaths occurred since the prior analysis. Grade ≥3 infection rates since the start of study appeared higher in pts <26 y and in pts with prior blina (Table). Rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse-related mortality (95% CI) at 48 mo were 25% (15-37) and 34% (24-45; N=78), respectively. Of note, 6/17 NRM events (35%) occurred in pts with sub alloSCT. Conclusions: After >4 y follow-up, pts in ZUMA-3 continued to experience OS benefit regardless of age, prior therapy, or sub alloSCT status, though pts with prior blina had a numerically lower 48-mo OS rate. Small subgroups and unbalanced pt characteristics limit interpretation of these results. No new safety signals were observed. Further studies are needed to fully assess the impact of age, prior therapies, and sub alloSCT on outcomes after brexu-cel. Clinical trial information: NCT02614066 . [Table: see text]

Response to first-line therapies in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with low PD-L1 expression: A multi-center retrospective study.

e20574 Background: For metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with low PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score:1-49%), chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IC), with bevacizumab (BC), or with both (IBC) have been established as standard first-line options. However, the optimal scheme is still undetermined. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 125 metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients with low PD-L1 expression from four cancer centers. All the patients received IC, BC, or IBC as the first-line therapies. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a ratio of 1:1:1 was used to balance the inter-group clinical characteristics. Efficacy, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as safety were evaluated. Results: 35 of the 125 patients received IBC, 37 received BC, and 53 received IC. After PSM, a total of 35 pairs of patients were enrolled in the analysis. Patients receiving IBC (ORR: 57.1%, DCR:100%) or IC (ORR: 57.1%, DCR: 91.4%) obtained superior ORR and DCR in relative to those receiving BC (ORR: 45.7%, DCR: 82.9%). However, only IBC (median PFS: 20.47m; median OS: not research) rather than IC (median PFS: 10.0m; median OS: 21.36m) treatment generated significantly prolonged PFS and OS compared with BC (median PFS: 9.43m, P = 0.007; median OS: 23.2m, P = 0.048). We further analyzed the survival benefit based on different clinical and molecular features. We found patients with female gender had more significant OS benefit from IBC treatment over IC or BC treatment. In addition, non-smokers benefit more from IBC compared with IC. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was more frequent in IBC (74.3%) and IC (85.7%) group in relative to BC group (42.8%). Meanwhile, ≥ grade 3 AEs (22.9%) was markedly higher in IBC group compared with that in BC group (5.7%). However, leukopenia and neutropenia represent the most common ≥ grade 3 AEs, which are easy to be clinically managed. Conclusions: For metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients with low PD-L1 expression, IBC is the preferred first-line therapy in terms of survival. However, the AEs should be carefully concerned.

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) or ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): 45-month (mo) follow-up from CheckMate 648.

4034 Background: NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI are approved for the treatment of advanced ESCC in the US, EU, Japan, and many other countries based on the results from CheckMate 648 (NCT03143153). Here, we report 45-mo follow-up results. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC were randomized to NIVO (240 mg Q2W) + chemo (fluorouracil + cisplatin Q4W), NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W) or chemo. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients (pts) with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 1%. Results: In total, 970 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo, NIVO + IPI, or chemo. With 45-mo minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI demonstrated continued OS benefit and higher 45-mo OS rates vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% and all randomized pts (Table). Duration of response (DOR) was longer (Table) and the proportion of responders with DOR ≥ 45 mo was greater with NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with tumor cell PD-L1 ≥ 1% (7% and 23% vs 0%, respectively) and all randomized pts (14% and 18% vs 6%). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 96% of pts with NIVO + chemo, 80% with NIVO + IPI, and 90% with chemo; grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 49%, 33%, and 37% of pts, respectively. No additional TRAEs leading to discontinuation and no new treatment-related deaths were reported with longer follow-up. Conclusions: After 45 mo of follow-up, NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival benefit and more durable responses vs chemo, with no new safety signals. These results further support NIVO + chemo and NIVO + IPI as 1L treatment options for advanced ESCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03143153 . [Table: see text]

Quadruplet therapy for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TENDMM): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e19534 Background: Immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors plus dexamethasone are the standard triplet induction regimen for TENDMM. We analyzed the efficacy of adding either anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or anti-SLAMF7 antibody to the triplet therapy. Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and published abstracts were systematically searched from each database’s inception through 01-31-2024 to identify II/III trials assessing quadruplet therapy versus triplet therapy in TENDMM patients. Hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), odds ratios (OR) for overall response rates (ORR), measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate (with sensitivity of 10 -5) and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (G≥3 TRAE) were summarized using random effects meta-analysis via inverse variance approach. Additional subgroup analyses based on the cytogenetic risk were performed. P-value of interaction (Pint ) < 0.1 was pre-specified as statistically significant for the difference between the two groups. Results: 3806 studies were screened and seven trials were included with a total of 3546 patients. Four trials (2303 patients) assessed the addition of anti-CD-38 mAbs and three (1243 patients) assessed anti-SLAMF7 mAb, elotuzumab to the triplet regimen. Quadruplet therapy significantly improved PFS as compared to triplet (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.92), and the PFS benefit was also observed in standard risk group (HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.2-0.9); however, results were insignificant for high-risk group (HR 0.8; 95% CI 0.62-1.93). No significant OS benefit was observed (HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.49–1.26); however, data for three trials (CASSIOPEIA, DSMM XVII, PERSEUS) is immature, with longer-term follow-up ongoing. Quadruplet therapy showed significant results for very good partial response or better (OR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.36), stringent complete response (OR: 1.74; 95% CI 1.27-2.07) and complete response or better (OR: 1.91; 95% CI 1.19-3.06). MRD rate shows benefit with quadruplet therapy (OR: 2.59; 95% CI 2.22-3.01). Improved MRD rate was also observed for high-risk (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.4-3.2) and standard-risk group (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.68-3.94). Secondary analysis for efficacy of anti-CD38 mAbs showed benefit for PFS (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.35-0.56), ORR (OR: 1.77;95% CI: 1.02-3.06), and MRD (OR: 2.98; 95% CI 1.8-4.8). G ≥3 TRAE did not significantly differ between the groups (OR: 1.05; 95% CI 0.97-1.12). However, quadruplet therapy showed significant risk of infection (OR: 1.2; 95% 1.05-1.35) and thrombocytopenia (OR: 1.41; 95% CI 1.24-1.59). Conclusions: Quadruplet therapy improved PFS, ORR, and MRD rates compared to triplet regimen and has demonstrated promising benefits to be considered the new standard of care for TENDMM patients.

Real-world outcomes of patients with resected stage III melanoma treated with adjuvant therapies.

Both immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) are used as adjuvant (adj) treatment for stage III melanoma, however, data describing real-world outcomes are limited. In addition, a significant proportion of patients relapse, for whom best management is unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, and safety of adj anti-PD1 IO and TT in a real-world cohort of patients with resected stage III melanoma, and further delineate patterns of recurrence and treatment strategies. We retrospectively analyzed 130 patients who received adj therapy (100 anti-PD1 IO and 30 TT). At a median follow-up of 30 months, median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 24.6 (95% CI, 17-not reached [NR]) versus 64 (95% CI, 29.5-NR) months for the TT and IO groups, respectively (p = 0.26). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for either subgroup. At data cutoff, 77% and 82% of patients in TT and IO arms were alive. A higher number of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were noted in the IO group (11% vs. 3%), however, a higher proportion of patients permanently discontinued adj therapy in the TT group (43% vs. 11%) due to toxicity. Strategies at relapse and outcomes were variable based on location and timing of recurrence. A significant number of patients who relapsed after adj IO received a second round of IO. Among them, patients who were off adj IO at relapse had superior second median RFS (mRFS2), compared to those who relapsed while on adj IO; mRFS2 was NR versus 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.5-NR), respectively, p = 0.02. In summary, both TT and IO yielded prolonged RFS in a real-world setting, however, longer follow-up is needed to determine any potential OS benefit. Adj therapy, particularly TT, may not be as well tolerated as suggested in clinical trials, with lower completion rates (59% vs. 74%) in a real-life setting. Overall, patients who relapse during adj therapy have poor outcomes, while patients who relapse after discontinuation of adj IO therapy appear to benefit from IO re-treatment.

Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III EVOKE-01 Study.

The open-label, phase III EVOKE-01 study evaluated sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus standard-of-care docetaxel in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with progression on/after platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1, and targeted treatment for actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Primary analysis is reported. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by histology, best response to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen, and AGA treatment received or not) to SG (one 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8) or docetaxel (one 75 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on day 1) in 21-day cycles. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, patient-reported symptom assessment, and safety. In the intention-to-treat population (SG, n = 299; docetaxel, n = 304), 55.4% had one previous line of therapy. Median follow-up was 12.7 months (range, 6.0-24.0). The primary end point was not met. There was a numerical OS improvement for SG versus docetaxel (median, 11.1 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.04]; one-sided P = .0534), consistent across squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Median PFS was 4.1 versus 3.9 months (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.11]). An OS benefit was observed for SG (n = 192) versus docetaxel (n = 191) in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen (3.5-month median OS increase; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97]); this was consistent across histologies. Among patients receiving SG and docetaxel, 6.8% and 14.2% discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively; 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, had TRAEs leading to death. Although statistical significance was not met, OS numerically improved with SG versus docetaxel, which was consistent across histologies. Clinically meaningful improvement in OS was noted in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen. SG was better tolerated than docetaxel and consistent with its known safety profile, with no new safety signals.

Molecular classification and biomarkers of outcome with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: analyses of the CASPIAN phase 3 study

BackgroundWe explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial.Methods805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry.ResultsIn 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.

The road to tailored adjuvant chemotherapy for all four non-pancreatic periampullary cancers: An international multimethod cohort study.

Despite differences in tumour behaviour and characteristics between duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC), the intestinal (AmpIT) and pancreatobiliary (AmpPB) subtype of ampullary adenocarcinoma and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on these cancers, as well as the optimal ACT regimen, has not been comprehensively assessed. This study aims to assess the influence of tailored ACT on DAC, dCCA, AmpIT, and AmpPB. Patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma were identified and collected from 36 tertiary centres between 2010 - 2021. Per non-pancreatic periampullary tumour type, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and the main relevant regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy were compared. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The study included a total of 2866 patients with DAC (n = 330), AmpIT (n = 765), AmpPB (n = 819), and dCCA (n = 952). Among them, 1329 received ACT, and 1537 did not. ACT was associated with significant improvement in OS for AmpPB (P = 0.004) and dCCA (P < 0.001). Moreover, for patients with dCCA, capecitabine mono ACT provided the greatest OS benefit compared to gemcitabine (P = 0.004) and gemcitabine - cisplatin (P = 0.001). For patients with AmpPB, no superior ACT regime was found (P > 0.226). ACT was not associated with improved OS for DAC and AmpIT (P = 0.113 and P = 0.445, respectively). Patients with resected AmpPB and dCCA appear to benefit from ACT. While the optimal ACT for AmpPB remains undetermined, it appears that dCCA shows the most favourable response to capecitabine monotherapy. Tailored adjuvant treatments are essential for enhancing prognosis across all four non-pancreatic periampullary adenocarcinomas.

Efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drug monotherapy and combination therapy for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

As the development of novel anti-angiogenic drugs and the continuous evolution of guideline recommendations, the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic agents in ovarian cancer (OC) remains unclear. Consequently, a meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drug monotherapy and combination therapy for OC. An exhaustive literature review was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, encompassing all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up until 6 April 2024. The evaluation of efficacy outcomes incorporated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). Safety was assessed through the occurrence of any grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs. Synthesis of the data involved the calculation of hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks (RRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs). Trial sequential analysis was executed employing TSA v0.9.5.10 Beta software, STATA 12.0, and R software 4.3.1. In this meta-analysis, 35 RCTs were included, encompassing 16,199 subjects in total. The overall analysis indicated that anti-angiogenic drug combination therapy significantly improved PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.678 [0.606-0.759], 95% PI: 0.415-1.108), OS (HR [95% CI] = 0.917 [0.870-0.966], 95% PI: 0.851-0.984), and ORR (RR [95% CI] = 1.441 [1.287-1.614], 95% PI: 1.032-2.014), but also increased the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.137 [1.099-1.177], 95% PI: 1.011-1.252). The analysis did not corroborate any benefit of anti-angiogenic monotherapy over placebo concerning PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.956 [0.709-1.288], 95% PI: 0.345-2.645) and OS (HR [95% CI] = 1.039 [0.921-1.173], 95% PI: 0.824-1.331). However, it was observed that monotherapy with anti-angiogenic drugs did increase the incidence of any grade AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.072 [1.036-1.109], 95% PI: 0.709-1.592). Our study confirmed the PFS, OS, and ORR benefits of anti-angiogenic drug combination therapy for OC patients. The efficacy results of anti-angiogenic monotherapy necessitates further evaluation as more RCTs become available. Clinicians should be vigilant of AEs when administering anti-angiogenic agents in a clinical setting.

Frequency of HLA-A*02:01 in the Brazilian population and its impact on uveal melanoma systemic treatment.

Uveal melanoma is a rare malignancy originating from extracutaneous melanocytes on the uveal layer of the eyes. The incidence varies depending on the ethnic and racial global distribution, as uveal melanoma is more frequently diagnosed in non-Hispanic White subjects when compared with Hispanic, Asian, or Black individuals. Despite all the local effective management of uveal melanoma, roughly 50% of the cases will develop distant metastases. For these cases, the historical median overall survival is around 12 months. Recently, tebentafusp became the first therapy to receive Food and Drug Administration approval following a phase 3 trial demonstrating a continued long-term benefit for overall survival among adult HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma. Since 2021, high-resolution sequence-based HLA typing has been considered the gold standard for determining HLA alleles and haplotypes for the Brazilian Bone Marrow Donor Registry (REDOME) donors. To depict the HLA-A*02:01-positivity in Brazilian individuals, the REDOME database was queried out for the donors included from 2021 to 2023 and tested for HLA in high-resolution platforms. A total of 203, 44 donors were included and the frequency of the HLA-A*02:01 was 21.01%, much lower compared to the frequency in North Americans and Europeans (around 45%). Despite tebentafusp has demonstrated promising results in the treatment of uveal melanoma, the number of patients to benefit from this new approach can strongly vary by ethnic and racial issues. New strategies for the systemic treatment of advanced uveal melanoma have to be developed and tested as this disease still represents an unmet medical need.

Prognostic significance of pan-immune-inflammation value in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by curative radiofrequency ablation: potential role for individualized adjuvant systemic treatment

Background This study aimed to explore the prognostic role of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and develop a new risk model to guide individualized adjuvant systemic treatment following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and methods Patients with early-stage HCC treated by RFA were randomly divided into training cohort A (n = 65) and testing cohort B (n = 68). Another 265 counterparts were enrolled into external validating cohort C. Various immune-inflammatory biomarkers (IIBs) were screened in cohort A. Prognostic role of PIV was evaluated and validated in cohort B and C, respectively. A nomogram risk model was built in cohort C and validated in pooled cohort D. Clinical benefits of adjuvant anti-angiogenesis therapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (AA-ICI) following RFA was assessed in low- and high-risk groups. Results The cutoff point of PIV was 120. High PIV was an independent predictor of unfavorable recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RFS and OS rates of patients with high PIV were significantly lower than those with low PIV both in cohort B (P RFS=0.016, P OS=0.011) and C (P RFS<0.001, P OS<0.001). The nomogram model based on PIV, tumor number and BCLC staging performed well in risk stratification in external validating cohort C. Adjuvant AA-ICI treatment showed an added benefit in OS (p = 0.011) for high-risk patients. Conclusions PIV is a feasible independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in early-stage HCC patients who received curative RFA. The proposed PIV-based nomogram risk model could help clinicians identify high-risk patients and tailor adjuvant systemic treatment and disease follow-up scheme.

Abstract B010: Tumor B8T expression stratifies overall survival in high risk muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma

Abstract Background and Objective: Determining novel biomarkers to identify patients that benefit and do not benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is critical to avoid overtreatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a biomarker that associates with overall survival (OS) benefit to ICI in patients with muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC). However, few studies have examined whether existing immune based biomarkers stratify OS within the high risk, ctDNA(+) population. Methods: To address this, we interrogated ctDNA and RNA sequencing data from the IMvigor010 dataset of patients with high risk MIUC after cystectomy who were randomized to adjuvant atezolizumab versus observation. We correlated OS with ctDNA positivity and expression of a B cell and CD8 T cell gene signature (B8T). Key Findings: In patients who were ctDNA(+), high tumor expression of a B cell gene signature (BCGS) associated with significantly higher OS when compared with patients with low tumor BCGS, regardless of whether patients were treated with atezolizumab. In ctDNA(+) patients with high tumor expression of both BCGS and CD8 T cell gene signature (CD8TGS), e.g. B8T high/high, atezolizumab did not associate with OS benefit. Conversely, in patients with B8T high/low tumors, receipt of adjuvant atezolizumab associated with significantly increased OS (p &amp;lt; 0.001), and this benefit remained significant in multivariable analyses (p = 0.047). Notably, benefit with atezolizumab occurred in patients with B8T high/low tumors who were either ctDNA(+) (p = 0.057) or ctDNA(-) (p = 0.034). Conclusions and Clinical Implications: While tumor B8T high/high expression is a prognostic biomarker for OS in ctDNA(+) patients with high risk MIUC, these results suggest B8T high/low is a predictive biomarker for benefit from ICI. Moreover, in a small subset of patients who are ctDNA(-), tumor B8T high/low associates with benefit to ICI. This supports the utility of the B8T biomarker as a prognostic identifier in high risk MIUC, its ability to identify patients who will benefit from ICI regardless of ctDNA status, and for the first time ascertains a potential cohort of patients who are ctDNA(-) yet benefit from ICI. Citation Format: Roy Elias, Adam K. Aragaki, Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Noah M. Hahn, David J. McConkey, Burles A. Johnson III. Tumor B8T expression stratifies overall survival in high risk muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2024 May 17-20; Charlotte, NC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(10_Suppl):Abstract nr B010.