Over-the-scope Clip Research Articles

Over-the-Scope Clips vs Standard Endoscopic Interventions for First-line Treatment of NVUGI Bleeding: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Background and Aims: Recently, over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have been extensively studied for hemostasis of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Our goal was to compare the efficacy of OTSCs with standard endoscopic interventions (SEIs) as first-line treatments. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed to identify Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) comparing OTSCs with SEIs as first-line therapy for NVUGIB. This search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Out of 819 reviewed studies, 5 RCTs comprising a total of 555 patients (277 OTSCs vs. 278 SEIs) were included. The OTSC group had a lower 30-day rebleeding rate (Risk Ratio [RR]: 0.43; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.24, 0.77; I²: 0%; p = 0.004) and a higher clinical success rate (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.28; I²: 0%; p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in technical success (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.14; I² = 73%; p = 0.13), 30-day all-cause mortality (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.14; I²: 0%; p = 0.10), need for further intervention (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.43, 3.47; I²: 0%; p = 0.71), or length of hospital stay (Mean Difference: 0.31; 95% CI: -1.08, 1.70; I²: 0%; p = 0.66). The risk of bias, which was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, indicated some concerns of bias. Conclusion: OTSCs are more efficient than SEIs as a first-line treatment in terms of rebleeding within 30 days and clinical success rates.

Over-the-scope clips for Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition. Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have emerged as a promising endoscopic treatment option for NVUGIB. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of OTSCs compared to standard endoscopic treatments (ST) in patients with NVUGIB. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OTSCs with ST for NVUGIB. The primary outcomes were initial hemostasis and persistent bleeding. Secondary outcomes included rebleeding rates, mortality, hospital stays and others. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random/fixed-effects models. Six RCTs involving 621 patients were included in the meta-analysis. OTSCs demonstrated significantly higher initial hemostasis (OR 4.80, 95% CI 1.78-12.96; P = 0.002) and lower persistent bleeding rates (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.56; P = 0.003) compared to ST group. The rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the OTSC group 7-days re-bleeding (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.53; P = 0.001); 30-days rebleeding (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.22, 0.70; P = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in mortality (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.31-1.33; P = 0.38) and hospital stay (mean difference 0.79days 95%CI -0.57, 2.15) between the two groups. OTSCs are more effective than ST for achieving hemostasis and preventing rebleeding in patients with NVUGIB, without increasing mortality. Key message What is Already Known Previous studies have shown that nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a serious medical condition that needs effective endoscopic interventions. The success rates of standard treatments for achieving hemostasis and preventing rebleeding are not consistent. What This Study Adds According to this study, over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have the same mortality rate as standard endoscopic treatments, but they significantly improve initial hemostasis and lower rebleeding rates. Impact on Research, Practice, or Policy The findings support the use of OTSCs as a preferred intervention for NVUGIB, which could affect clinical guidelines and encourage additional research focused on improving endoscopic techniques and patient outcomes in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Adverse Events of the Over The Scope Endoscopic Clips and Cutters: A MAUDE Database Analysis

The OVESCO® clip system, including the Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) and Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD), has demonstrated efficacy in managing various gastrointestinal pathologies. However, real-world data on device malfunctions and patient complications are limited. This study aimed to analyze adverse events associated with OVESCO® clips and cutters reported to the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. The MAUDE database was searched for reports related to OVESCO® clips and cutters from January 1, 2007, to August 30, 2024. Event date, device type and model, manufacturer, event type, device problem, and patient complications were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. Forty-two reports were identified, with 41 involving OVESCO® clips and one involving an OVESCO® cutter. The most common device problem for OVESCO® clips was failure to deploy (61.0%), followed by unintended deployment or misfiring (17.1%). Gastrointestinal perforation was the most frequently reported patient complication (60%). The OVESCO® cutter report described device component breakage and foreign body retention. No clear trends in adverse event reporting were observed over the study period. OVESCO® clips and cutters are associated with potential device malfunctions and patient complications, particularly gastrointestinal perforation. The findings highlight the need for careful patient selection, meticulous technique, and close post-procedural monitoring. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are essential to optimize device safety and efficacy. Continued post-marketing surveillance and real-world data analysis are crucial for monitoring the performance of endoscopic devices and improving patient outcomes.

S4030 Duodenal Ulcer and Gastrointestinal Bleeding as a Late Adverse Event of Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) Placement

S4030 Duodenal Ulcer and Gastrointestinal Bleeding as a Late Adverse Event of Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) Placement

S4115 Unusual Occurrence of Significant Bleeding After Fine-Needle Biopsy of a Subepithelioid Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Successfully Managed with an Over-the-Scope-Clip (OTSC)

S4115 Unusual Occurrence of Significant Bleeding After Fine-Needle Biopsy of a Subepithelioid Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Successfully Managed with an Over-the-Scope-Clip (OTSC)

Additional over-the-scope-clip closure can shorten endoscopic vacuum therapy for postoperative upper gastrointestinal leakage.

Background and study aims Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has become the most effective therapeutic option for upper gastrointestinal leakage. Despite its efficiency, this treatment can necessitate a long hospitalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether additional use of an over-the-scope-clips (OTSC) closure after successful EVT can shorten leakage therapy. Patients and methods All patients treated with EVT for leakages in the upper gastrointestinal tract at our center from 2012 to 2022 were divided into two propensity matched cohorts (EVT+OTSC vs. EVT only). The EVT+OTSC patients received OSTC application at the end of successful EVT directly after removal of the last sponge. The primary endpoint was the time interval from leakage diagnosis until discharge. Secondary endpoints included EVT efficacy, complications, and nutritional status at discharge. Results A total of 84 matched patients were analyzed. EVT efficacy was 100% in both groups. The time interval from leakage until discharge was significantly shorter in the EVT+OTSC vs. EVT group (33 [19-48] vs. 46 days [29-77] P = 0.004). No patient in the EVT+OTSC group required additional procedures for leakage management, whereas five (12%) in the EVT group needed additional stent placement ( P = 0.021). More patients could be discharged on sufficient oral nutrition in the EVT+OTSC group (98% vs. 60%; P < 0.001). Conclusions The addition of OTSCs after successful EVT is safe and has the potential to shorten leakage therapy, enabling earlier discharge along with better functional outcomes.

Over-the-scope clip for closure of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula after gastrostomy tube removal: a multicenter pediatric experience

BackgroundPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is commonly used for enteral nutritional access, but gastrocutaneous fistulae (GCF) may persist after tube removal, posing clinical challenges. The use of endoscopic closure devices, including over-the-scope clips (OTSC), has shown promise in managing non-healing fistulae, although data in the pediatric population are limited.MethodsA retrospective multicenter study analyzed pediatric patients who underwent GCF closure following gastrostomy tube removal. Data from seven centers across multiple countries were collected, including patient demographics, procedural details, complications, and outcomes. Closure techniques were compared between OTSC and surgical closure.ResultsOf 67 pediatric patients included, 21 underwent OTSC closure and 46 had surgical closure. Surgical closure demonstrated a higher success rate (100%) compared to OTSC closure (61.9%, P < 0.001). While procedural duration was shorter for OTSC closure (25 vs. 40 min, P = 0.002), complications, and scar quality were comparable between techniques. A subsequent sub-analysis did not reveal differences based on center experience.ConclusionOTSC closure is feasible and safe in pediatric patients, but surgical closure remains superior in achieving sustained GCF closure, although OTSC offers benefits, such as shorter procedural duration, potentially reducing the duration of general anesthesia exposure. Non-operative approaches, including OTSC, may be a valuable alternative to surgical closure.Graphical abstract

Evaluating no fixation, endoscopic suture fixation, and an over-the-scope clip for anchoring fully covered self-expanding metal stents in benign upper gastrointestinal conditions: a comparative multicenter international study (With Video)

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) are widely used in benign upper gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, but stent migration remains a limitation. An over-the-scope clip (OTSC) device (Stentfix {SF], Ovesco Endoscopy) for stent anchoring has recently been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of OTSC fixation on FCSEMS migration rate. In this retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent FCSEMS placement for benign upper GI conditions from January 2011 to October 2022 at 16 centers, the primary outcome was rate of stent migration. The secondary outcomes were clinical success and adverse events. A total of 311 (no fixation [NF] 122, SF 94, endoscopic suturing [ES] 95) patients underwent 316 stenting procedures. Compared with the NF group (n= 49, 39%), the rates of stent migration were significantly lower in the SF (n= 16, 17%, P= .001) and ES (n= 23, 24%, P= .01) groups. The rates of stent migration were not different between the SF and ES groups (P= .2). On multivariate analysis, SF (odds ratio [OR], 0.34, 95% CI, 0.17-0.70, P< .01) and ES (OR, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.23-0.91; P= .02) were independently associated with decreased risk of stent migration. Compared with the NF group (n= 64; 52%), there were higher rates of clinical success in the SF (n= 64; 68%; P= .03) and ES (n= 66; 69%; P= .02) groups. There was no significant difference in the rates of adverse events among the 3 groups. Stent fixation using OTSCs is safe and effective at preventing stent migration and may also result in improved clinical response.

Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope-clips in the therapy of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Meta-analysis.

Acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) is a frequent life-threatening acute condition in gastroenterology associated with high morbidity and mortality. Over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) is a new endoscopic hemostasis technique, which is being used in ANVUGIB and is more effective. To summarize and analyze the effects of the OTSC in prevention of recurrent bleeding, clinical success rate, procedure time, hospital stay, and adverse events in the treatment of ANVUGIB, to evaluate whether OTSC can replace standard endoscopic therapy as a new generation of treatment for ANVUGIB. The literature related to OTSC and standard therapy for ANVUGIB published before January 2023 was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google, and CNKI databases. Changes in recurrent bleeding (7 or 30 days), clinical results (clinical success rate, conversion rate to surgery, mortality), therapy time (procedure time, hospital stay), and adverse events in the OTSC intervention group were summarized and analyzed, and the MD or OR of 95%CI is calculated by Review Manager 5.3. This meta-analysis involved 11 studies with 1266 patients. Total risk of bias was moderate-to-high. For patients in the OTSC group, 7- and 30-days recurrent bleeding rates, as well as procedure time, hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay, were greatly inhibited. OTSC could significantly improve the clinical success rate of ANVUGIB. OTSC therapy did not cause serious adverse and was effective in reducing patient mortality. OTSC may provide more rapid and sustained hemostasis, and thus, promote recovery and reduce mortality in patients with ANVUGIB. In addition, the safety of OTSC is assured.

Retrospective study of 189 cases of acute perforated peptic ulcer: safety and efficacy of over-the-scope-clip based endoscopic closure.

To compare the clinical outcomes in patients with acute perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treated with over-the-scope clip (OTSC), non-surgical, and surgical interventions, and to explore the effectiveness and safety of OTSC closure. Hospital stay, antibiotic use, diet resumption time, and mortality rate were analyzed retrospectively. Binary Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors influencing PPU complicated with sepsis. Patients were divided into three treatment groups: OTSC (n = 62), non-surgical (n = 72), and surgical (n = 55) groups. The median time (IQR) from symptom onset to admission was 9.0 (4-23) h. 88.71% (55/62) of the patients in In the OTSC group underwent OTSC closure within 24h (median [IQR] time: 14.5 [7.00-30.25] h). The perforation diameters in the OTSC and surgical groups were 9.87mm ± 5.97mm and 8.55mm ± 6.17mm, respectively. The median (IQR) hospital stays in the OTSC (9.50 [7.00-12.25] days) and non-surgical group (9.00[7.00-13.00]days) were similar (p > 0.05), but shorter than that in surgical group (12.00[10.00-16.00]days), (p < 0.05). The median duration of antibiotic use was shorter in the OTSC group (7.00[3.00-10.00]) than in the non-surgical group (9.00[7.00-11.00]) and surgical group (11.00[9.00-13.00]) ( p < 0.05); and the time to resume oral feeding was shorter in the OTSC group (4.00[2.00-5.25]) than in the non-surgical group (7.00[6.13-9.00]) and surgical group (8.00[6.53-10.00]), respectively ( p < 0.05). No mortality difference among groups (p = 0.109) was found. Lower albumin level at admission, older age, and elevated creatinine levels were associated with increased sepsis risk, with OR(95%CI) of 0.826 (0.687-0.993), 1.077 (1.005-1.154), and 1.025 (1.006-1.043), respectively (all p < 0.05). OTSC closure improves clinical outcomes of acute PPU patients without sepsis. Age, hypoalbuminemia, and baseline renal dysfunction increase the risk of sepsis, while mortality was associated with sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction.

Meta-analysis: Over-the-scope clips in patients at high risk of re-bleeding following upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is challenging in patients at high risk of re-bleeding in whom standard endoscopic treatment (ST) has limited effectiveness. Over-the-scope clips (OTSC) have shown promise in these patients although their precise role remains uncertain. To confirm the role of OTSC in patients with UGIB at high risk of re-bleeding. We systematically searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase from January 1st, 1970 to April 24, 2024 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OTSC and ST in acute non-variceal UGIB with high re-bleeding risk. The GRADE framework assessed evidence certainty, while trial sequential analysis (TSA) controlled random errors and evaluated conclusion validity. We analysed four RCTs (319 patients); pooled risk ratio (RR) for clinical success at initial endoscopy favoured OTSC (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.08-1.56, p = 0.006, I2 = 58%, moderate certainty of evidence). TSA showed the desired sample size was 410 and the cumulative Z curve crossing the trial sequential monitoring boundary. The pooled RR for re-bleeding within 30 days favoured OTSC (RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.30-0.94, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty of evidence). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality, or length of hospital or ICU stay. Moderate certainty evidence supports OTSC as a superior initial treatment for acute non-variceal UGIB with high re-bleeding risk. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm OTSCs' role by exploring other prognostic outcomes and assessing cost-effectiveness and potential complications.

Over-the-scope clip as first-line treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TOP Study).

First-line over-the-scope (OTS) clip treatment has shown higher efficacy than standard endoscopic therapy in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) from different causes. We compared OTS clips with through-the-scope (TTS) clips as first-line mechanical treatment in the specific setting of peptic ulcer bleeding. We conducted an international, multicenter randomized controlled trial on consecutive patients with suspected NVUGIB. Patients with Forrest Ia-IIb gastroduodenal peptic ulcer were randomized 1:1 to OTS clip or TTS clip treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of 30-day rebleeding after successful initial hemostasis. Secondary outcomes included the rates of successful initial hemostasis and overall clinical success, defined as the composite of successful initial hemostasis and no evidence of 30-day rebleeding. 251 patients were screened and 112 patients were randomized to OTS (n = 61) or TTS (n = 51) clip treatment. The 30-day rebleeding rates were 1.6% (1/61) and 3.9% (2/51) in patients treated with OTS clips and TTS clips, respectively (Kaplan-Meier log-rank, P = 0.46). Successful initial hemostasis rates were 98.4% (60/61) in the OTS clip group and 78.4% (40/51) in the TTS clip group (P = 0.001). Overall clinical success rates were 96.7% (59/61) with OTS clips and 74.5% (38/51) with TTS clips (P = 0.001). Low rates of 30-day rebleeding were observed after first-line endoscopic treatment of acute peptic ulcer bleeding with either OTS or TTS clips. However, OTS clips showed higher efficacy than TTS clips in achieving successful initial hemostasis and overall clinical success.

Endoscopic closure techniques of bariatric surgery complications: a meta-analysis.

Leaks following bariatric surgery, while rare, are potentially fatal due to risk of peritonitis and sepsis. Anastomotic leaks and gastro-gastric fistulae following Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as well as staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy have historically been treated multimodally with surgical drainage, aggressive antibiotic therapy, and more recently, endoscopically. Endoscopic clipping using over-the-scope clips and endoscopic suturing are two of the most common approaches used to achieve full thickness closure. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed to identify articles on the use of endoscopic clipping or suturing for the treatment of leaks and fistulae following bariatric surgery. Studies focusing on stents, and those that incorporated multiple closure techniques simultaneously, were excluded. Literature review and meta-analysis were performed with the PRISMA guidelines. Five studies with 61 patients that underwent over-the-scope clip (OTSC) closure were included. The pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was 81.1% (95% CI 67.3 to 91.7). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (I2 = 39%, p = 0.15). Three studies with 92 patients that underwent endoscopic suturing were included. The weighted pooled proportion of successful closure across the studies was shown to be 22.4% (95% CI 14.6 to 31.3). The successful closure rates were homogeneous (I2 = 0%, p = 0.44). Three of the studies, totaling 34 patients, examining OTSC deployment reported data for reintervention rate. The weighted pooled proportion of reintervention across the studies was 35.0% (95% CI 11.7 to 64.7). We noticed statistically significant heterogeneity (I2 = 68%, p = 0.04). One study, with 20 patients examining endoscopic suturing, reported rate of repeat intervention 60%. Observational reports show that patients managed with OTSC were more likely to experience healing of their defect than those managed with endoscopic suturing. Larger controlled studies comparing different closure devices for bariatric leaks should be carried out to better understand the ideal endoscopic approach to these complications.

Review article: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding - review of current evidence and implications for management.

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency requiring hospital-based care. Advances in care across pre-endoscopic, endoscopic and post-endoscopic phases have led to improvements in clinical outcomes. To provide a detailed, evidence-based update on major aspects of care across pre-endoscopic, endoscopic and post-endoscopic phases. We performed a structured bibliographic database search for each topic. If a recent high-quality meta-analysis was not available, we performed a meta-analysis with random effects methods and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Pre-endoscopic management of UGIB includes risk stratification, a restrictive red blood cell transfusion policy unless the patient has cardiovascular disease, and pharmacologic therapy with erythromycin and a proton pump inhibitor. Patients with cirrhosis should be treated with prophylactic antibiotics and vasoactive medications. Tranexamic acid should not be used. Endoscopic management of UGIB depends on the aetiology. For peptic ulcer disease (PUD) with high-risk stigmata, endoscopic therapy, including over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) and TC-325 powder spray, should be performed. For variceal bleeding, treatment should be customised by severity and anatomic location. Post-endoscopic management includes early enteral feeding for all UGIB patients. For high-risk PUD, PPI should be continued for 72 h, and rebleeding should initially be evaluated with a repeat endoscopy. For variceal bleeding, high-risk patients or those with further bleeding, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt can be considered. Management of acute UGIB should include treatment plans for pre-endoscopic, endoscopic and post-endoscopic phases of care, and customise treatment decisions based on aetiology and severity of bleeding.

Banding on the Run: Use of Over-the-Scope Clips (OTSC) for Treatment of Post Banding Ulcer Bleeding (PBUB).

Banding on the Run: Use of Over-the-Scope Clips (OTSC) for Treatment of Post Banding Ulcer Bleeding (PBUB).

Persistent Ostomy Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Removal: Treatment Strategies.

The purpose of this article is to review available literature on management of persistent ostomy following PEG tube removal. We will discuss the incidence of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula (GCF) following PEG tube removal, risk factors for their development, and management strategies that have been proposed and their efficacy. The use of over the scope clips (OTSC) have evolved recently in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, and fistula closures. OTSC has become more readily available and proven to be effective and safe. Suturing devices have shown promising results. Persistent gastrocutaneous fistula following PEG removal is a rare yet serious complication that can lead to continuous skin irritation and leakage of gastric contents and acid. There are several postulated risk factors but the most important of these is duration of placement. Management can include medical therapy which has recently been shown to be somewhat effective, endoscopic therapy and surgery as a last resort. Overall, the data on GCFs is limited and further study with larger sample size is needed.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Intervention Using Over-the-Scope Clips for Anastomotic Leakage Involving Secondary Fistula after Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Japanese Multicenter Case Series.

The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) is a highly effective clipping device for refractory gastrointestinal disease. However, Japanese data from multicenter studies for anastomotic leakage (AL) involving a secondary fistula after gastrointestinal surgery are lacking. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of OTSC placement in Japanese patients with such conditions. We retrospectively collected data from 28 consecutive patients from five institutions who underwent OTSC-mediated closure for AL between July 2017 and July 2020. The AL and fistula were located in the esophagus (3.6%, n = 1), stomach (10.7%, n = 3), small intestine (7.1%, n = 2), colon (25.0%, n = 7), and rectum (53.6%, n = 15). The technical success, clinical success, and complication rates were 92.9% (26/28), 71.4% (20/28), and 0% (0/28), respectively. An age of <65 years (85.7%), small intestinal AL (100%) and colonic AL (100%), defect size of <10 mm (82.4%), time to OTSC placement > 7 days (84.2%), and the use of simple suction (78.9%) and anchor forceps (80.0%) were associated with higher clinical success rates. OTSC placement is a useful therapeutic option for AL after gastrointestinal surgery.

Success rates of fixation techniques on prevention of esophageal stent migration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Esophageal stenting is an important intervention for managing malignant and benign dysphagia, with stent migration representing a common drawback. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to assess the benefit of stent fixation over nonfixation. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases until January 2023 for comparative studies evaluating the migration rates of esophageal stents with versus without (control) fixation. The primary outcome was migration rate. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rate. A subgroup analysis stratified the results based on different fixation techniques: suturing, over-the-scope (OTS) clipping, and through-the-scope (TTS) clipping. Meta-analysis was based on a random effects model and the results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 %CIs. 10 studies (1014 patients) were included. The rate of stent migration was significantly lower after fixation (OR 0.20, 95 %CI 0.11-0.37; I2 = 59 %, P = 0.01). The adverse event rate was similar between fixation and control groups (OR 0.65, 95 %CI 0.28-1.52; I2 = 55 %, P = 0.06). In the subgroup analysis, all fixation techniques remained superior to nonfixation of stents (suturing OR 0.23, 95 %CI 0.10-0.53; OTS clips OR 0.31, 95 %CI 0.17-0.58; TTS clips OR 0.10, 95 %CI 0.03-0.38); however, only the OTS and TTS clip groups achieved nonsignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 0 %, P = 0.67 and P = 0.73, respectively). No difference between techniques was recorded for migration rates. Esophageal stent fixation was associated with significantly lower migration rates compared with nonfixation of stents, regardless of fixation technique and stenting indication.

Efficacy of Over-the-Scope Clips Compared to Standard Therapy for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

AbstractThe current standard of treatment for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) includes endoscopic hemostasis with either through-the-scope clips or thermal therapy. However, they may be associated with rebleeding, especially in high-risk ulcers. Over-the-scope clips (OTSC) have been demonstrated in multiple recent studies to be an effective measure for NVUGIB. We aimed to analyze the current literature on standard therapy with OTSC to manage NVUGIB. A meta-analysis was performed by pooling the data from randomized studies obtained from a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and Scopus from inception to February 2023. The outcomes analyzed included rates of persistent bleeding, rebleeding, mortality, and duration of hospitalization. A total of five studies were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in the risk of persistent bleeding between the groups, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07–1.27). The use of OTSC was associated with a significantly lower risk of 7-day and 30-day rebleeding compared with standard therapy with RR of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16–0.59) and 0.42 (95% CI: 0.24–0.72), respectively. There was no difference in the risk of 30-day mortality or the duration of hospitalization. There was no change in the effect on subgroup analysis of studies using OTSC as first-line therapy. The use of OTSC can reduce the rebleeding rates after endoscopic hemostasis. However, they may not reduce the risk of persistent bleeding or mortality. Future studies are required on the cost-efficacy of this modality.

Endoscopic Resection with One-Port Placement: A Newly Developed Technique for the Safe Management of Advanced Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Introduction: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance (pure EFTR) is an emerging, less invasive treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the technique has seldom been performed outside China because of concerns regarding pneumoperitoneum, maintenance of endoscopic view, and endoscopic suturing. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection with one-port placement (EROPP) for gastric GISTs. Methods: This retrospective study included 17 patients with gastric GISTs originating from the muscularis propria who underwent EROPP between 2019 and 2022. One camera port was inserted in the umbilicus before initiating the endoscopic procedure to maintain intra-abdominal pressure, which was monitored and adjusted via this port. While allowing for conversion to laparoscopic surgery if needed, EFTR was performed as follows: (1) circumferential incision of the mucosal and submucosal layers around the lesion was performed by typical endoscopic submucosal dissection; (2) an intentional perforation and subsequent seromuscular resection was made using dental floss and an endo-clip for traction; and (3) closure of the gastric full-thickness defect was performed with an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) after peroral retrieval of the specimen. We retrospectively assessed the short-term outcomes and safety. Results: All procedures were completed successfully without conversion to laparoscopic surgery. The median size of the resected tumors was 23 mm (range, 8–35 mm), the median resection time was 36 min (range, 22–95 min), and closure time was 18 min (range, 10–45 min). The rates of en bloc and complete resection were 100% and 88%, respectively. In 2 cases, another port was added to aspirate the leaking fluid or check the condition of the endoscopic closure. All gastric defects were endoscopically closed, mainly using OTSCs. The recovery course for all patients was uneventful, and no adverse events were reported. Conclusions: EROPP is a safe and minimally invasive treatment for gastric GISTs and appears to be suitable for introducing EFTR procedures.