Outside-in Technique Research Articles

Comparison of Sexual Functions in Transobturator Tape Surgeries Performed with Inside-Out Technique and Outside-In Technique

Comparison of Sexual Functions in Transobturator Tape Surgeries Performed with Inside-Out Technique and Outside-In Technique

Proximally positioned femoral grafts decrease passive anterior tibial subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a posterior trans-septal portal.

To compare the anterior and posterior trans-septal (TS) portal approaches in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) by evaluating femoral tunnel positioning and passive anterior tibial subluxation (PATS). A total of 205 patients who underwent primary ACLR using the outside-in technique between March 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups based on the viewing techniques: the anterior group was treated using anteromedial or anterolateral portals (n = 155), and the TS group was treated using posterior TS portal (n = 55). The relative locations of the femoral tunnel were evaluated using the deep-shallow planes (X-axis) and superior-inferior planes (Y-axis) with the quadrant method in the lateral femoral condyle on a 3-dimensional computed tomography image. Anterior tibial subluxation for the lateral and medial compartments relative to the femoral condyles was evaluated as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Knee laxity was assessed using the pivot-shift test and stress radiography. In the posterior TS group, the femoral tunnel was usually located deeper on the X-axis and more superior on the Y-axis, which corresponds to a more proximal position, than in the anterior group (deeper on the X-axis and superior on the Y-axis). Moreover, the femoral tunnel locations in this group were more compactly distributed than those in the anterior group. The TS group showed significantly better reduction of postoperative PATS in the lateral compartments than the anterior group (anterior group vs. TS group: lateral compartment, 3.2 ± 3.1 vs. 4.5 ± 3.2mm; p = .016). Significantly better results were found in the TS group for knee stability as assessed by the pivot-shift grade (p = .044); however, there were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to patient-reported outcome measures (p > .05) and other complications (p = .090). Our results suggest that positioning the femoral tunnel using the posterior TS portal approach may lead to better outcomes in terms of PATS and rotational stability compared to the anterior portal approach in ACLR.

Enhancing Transforaminal Full Endoscopic Discectomy: Efficacy of the Hand Down Outside-In (HDOI) Technique.

Endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ELD) is a key advancement in minimally invasive spinal surgery, particularly for lumbar disc herniation. Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) are the two major methods used for FED. TELD, while less familiar to spine surgeons inexperienced in endoscopic surgery, presents challenges in visualizing the dura mater, a crucial aspect for reducing surgical complications. The hand down outside-in (HDOI) technique introduced by Dezawa enhances this visualization by positioning the cannula tip dorsally on the intervertebral disc and maneuvering it between the dura mater and disc to the spinal canal's midpoint. The cannula is then flipped to directly visualize the dura mater, enabling safe removal of the prolapsed disc material. A comparative study involving 20 patients treated from April 2020 to April 2022 examined the efficacy of the HDOI technique against conventional TELD. Each group, comprising ten patients, underwent ELD for lumbar disc herniation. While both groups showed similar improvements in clinical outcomes, as assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the HDOI group exhibited a 100% success rate for dura mater visualization, and this rate is significantly higher than the 60% observed in the conventional TELD group. Additionally, the time required for dura mater visualization was notably shorter for the HDOI technique. These results indicate that the HDOI technique not only enhances the safety and efficacy of TELD but may also encourage its wider use in clinical settings.

Comparison of the Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction through the All-inside and Outside-in Techniques: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective To compare the functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft (HA) through the all-inside (AI) technique with adjustable-loop cortical Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Watford, Hertfordshire, England) on the sides of the femur and tibia and through the outside-in (OI) technique using an interference screw on the tibial side and a cortical Endobutton on the femoral side. Materials and Methods The present is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 44 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction from February 2019 to February 2022 in a tertiary care hospital. As per computer-based randomization, the patients were distributed into two groups: the AI and OI groups. Both groups were evaluated for 12 months using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and part I (pain score) and part II (function score) of the Knee Society Score (KSS). Results On postoperative day 2, the VAS score was significantly higher in the OI group ( p = 0.0001), but insignificant ( p = 0.807) at 6 weeks. At 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, the score on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was significantly higher ( p = 0.001) in the AI group. At 6 months, both parts of the KSS showed a significant difference, with the AI group presenting a better outcome ( p = 0.04). However, at 12 months, the AI group presented a better score on part I of the KSS, but no differences were observed regarding part II. Conclusion In a follow-up of 12 months, the patients submitted to the AI technique presented better outcome scores and pain relief than those submitted to the OI technique.

Fibrin Clot–Augmented Meniscal Repair

Background: Failure rate of meniscal repair can reach 25%. Multiple techniques have been used to increase meniscal healing, notably biological augmentation techniques. One of them is fibrin clot–augmented meniscal repair, which will be described in this video. Indications: This technique is indicated mainly for the lesions with a high failure rate. This includes large, horizontal, and radial tears and even for meniscal cysts, especially in a stable knee. This technique can also be used in revision meniscal suture when failure is no longer an option. Surgical Technique: Fibrin clot is prepared from sterile peripheral venous blood from the patient. A plastic syringe is used to stir the blood in a sterile glass container. The fibrin clot is then formed and washed rigorously with saline solution. Rolling the fibrin clot which is fixed to the syringe allows to give the fibrillar aspect of the clot. The formed fibrin clot is now solid enough to be manipulated and can be fixed to a vicryl suture thread allowing it to enter the knee and be fixed inside the meniscal lesion. The clot is wrapped inside the meniscal lesion with inside-out or outside-in suture technique. Results: We used this technique for multiple types of lesions, like bucket handle meniscal tear, horizontal meniscal cleavage, parrot beak tear, and even in lesions within white-white zone. The postoperative protocol is the same as standard inside-out meniscal repair. This technique has been used in the literature with promising results. Conclusion: The fibrin clot–augmented meniscal repair is a demanding but promising technique. We need further follow-up to confirm its effectiveness. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Repair of radial tears of the lateral meniscus on a stable knee: Results at a minimum follow-up of 2 years

IntroductionIn younger patients, meniscal repair is recommended for isolated lateral meniscus tears that are most often due to acute trauma. But there is little published data on the outcomes of repairing this specific type of lesion. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, report the failure rate of repairing radial tears of the lateral meniscus in stable knees and determine the risk factors for failure. Materials and methodsAll patients who had a stable knee and underwent arthroscopic repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear between April 2013 and December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Failure was defined as revision surgery for recurrence of symptoms (pain, locking) with intraoperative confirmation that the meniscus did not heal. The following data were collected: demographics (age, sex, BMI), time to surgery, clinical outcome scores (Tegner, Lysholm, IKDC), surgical details (repair technique, lesion zone, number of sutures). ResultsThirty patients were included having a mean age of 20.1years (14–31). The follow-up ranged from 24 to 110months (mean 66.8±25.2). An all-inside repair was done in 6 patients (20%); an outside-in technique was done in 17 patients (57%) and a combination of all-inside and outside-in was done in 7 patients (23%). Four patients (13%) had a recurrence of their symptoms later on, while participating in sports. All the recurrences were at the initial tear site. The time to revision surgery was 16, 19, 24 and 37months in these four patients (mean 24±9). All the other patients were able to resume sports at their pre-injury level. Significant improvement in the IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner functional scores were found between the preoperative and postoperative assessments. No statistically significant risk factors for failure were identified. DiscussionThe functional healing rate after repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear in a stable knee was 86% at a mean follow-up of 5years, with the surgical technique having no impact on the long-term result. Most of the failures occurred within 2years of the repair procedure. We recommend repairing these tears as they have considerable healing potential. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective observational cohort study.

Satisfactory 5-year functional outcomes following primary ACL reconstructions from the UK National Ligament Registry.

The aim of this study was to describe the 10-year findings from the UK National Ligament Registry (NLR). A retrospective review was performed for prospectively collected data on the NLR between January 2013 and December 2022. All patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) on the registry were included. Surgical characteristics were analysed, including surgeon grade and case volume, concomitant knee procedures, venous thromboembolic prophylaxis, graft characteristics, femoral and tibial tunnel drilling, and fixation methods. Clinical outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsand 5 years following the index procedure. During the study period, 17,492 unilateral ACLR procedures were recorded. Autograft was used in 98%, most commonly a combined semitendinosus and gracilis graft (77%) or patella tendon graft (31%). Allograft was used in only 1% of the patients. In 52% of cases, ACLR was associated with an additional procedure, with isolated medial meniscal surgery being the most common (21%). Femoral tunnel drilling was mostly performed through an anteromedial portal (73%) and tibial tunnel drilling using an outside-in technique (92%). The most common method of femoral graft fixation was with an Endobutton fixed loop suspensory device (77%), while interference screws predominated for tibial tunnel fixation (86%). Patients who underwent ACLR surgery showed significant improvement in their functional outcome scores at six months, 1 year, 2 yearsand 5 years postoperatively. Data from the NLR shows a detailed description of the current trends and evolution of ACLR in the United Kingdom over the last 10 years. Satisfactory functional outcomes were observed 5 years postoperatively. This study provides useful information on the prevalence of ACL-associated injuries and current surgical techniques with the aim of improving the quality of clinical care and patients' outcomes. Moreover, it provides surgeons with a benchmark against which to compare current practices and functional outcomes following ACLR across the United Kingdom. Level III.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 3-Incision Technique With Allograft Quad Tendon ACL Reconstruction

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are becoming more common in younger and older athletes. Approximately 250,000 ACL injuries occur each year, requiring the need for an effective and reproducible surgical technique. Indications: The 3-incision outside-in technique utilizes the donor quadriceps tendon, an extraordinarily strong graft, without damage from autogenous harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstrings. While some data suggest higher re-rupture risk with donor tissue, this is counterbalanced by avoiding secondary surgical site damage. Technique Description: The ruptured ACL is removed and the intercondylar notch is cleaned to visualize the anatomical ACL insertion site. Using the 3-tunnel technique a gaff is passed through the intercondylar notch, through a puncture hole (incision 1) and a rear entry guide hooked to its tip. The guide point is pulled into the knee and placed in posterior aspect of the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. Through incision 2, a guide pin is drilled to this point and overdrilled with a 10-mm drill. The edges of the hole in the intercodylar notch are smoothed with a currette. The tibial footprint is cleared, a tibial aiming guide placed. Through incision 3, a guide pin is placed and over drilled with a 10-mm drill followed by a Gore-Tex reamer to ensure no impingement would inhibit graft passage. The proximal bone of a quadriceps tendon graft is sized through a 10-mm sizer and compacted. Two holes are drilled to hold sutures for the proximal aspect of the femoral graft. The quadriceps tendon graft is sized to fit through a 9-mm tunnel and the free end whipped with a stitch before being passed from outside-in through the smoothed tunnels. The femoral bone block is tapped to have a press fit initially and then is fixed with a Milagro screw. The knee is cycled ten times to remove slack and the interference fit guide pin is placed on the anterior aspect of the graft, and fixed with the knee at 15° to 30° of flexion. Stability is tested with confirmation of no impingement, and then an extra-articular reconstruction with a semitendinosus allograft is performed. The extra articular reconstruction is placed at the point between Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head, passed under the skin and the iliotibial band, and then inserted just anterior and superior to the ACL femoral drill hole. Results: Patient outcomes in our initial experience are comparable to our autogenous bone-tendon-bone (BTB) procedures without anterior knee pain. Return to sport is similar with autogenous procedures, with a delay of 6 to 12 months. In addition, there is a possibility for acceleration of healing with the addition of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid between 1 and 3 months postsurgery. We have insufficient data so far to determine if the re-rupture rate will decline compared with reported outcomes. Conclusion: The 3-incision technique with allograft quadriceps tendon for ACL reconstruction is a reproducible surgical technique that avoids harvest from the patient's own body. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Inside-Out Anchor Placement: A Technique to Instrument Far Medial Anchors in Acetabular Labral Repair

Labral tears most commonly occur anteriorly between the 12- and 3-o’clock positions, with the 12-o’clock position denoted as superior and the 3-o’clock position denoted as anterior. When approaching the 3-o’clock position and beyond, suture anchor placement becomes difficult given the challenging arthroscopic trajectory and an overall thin anterior rim of cortical bone for anchor purchase, resulting in a narrow angle of safe drilling. The purpose of this technical note is to present a safe and reproducible method of suture anchor placement during acetabular labral repair approaching the 3- and 4-o’clock positions, with the 12-o’clock position representing the superior anatomic location and the 3-o’clock position representing the anterior anatomic location regardless of hip laterality. We use an inside-out anchor placement technique to place far medial anchors, which differs from the conventional techniques (e.g., outside-in technique) in which anchor placement is performed along the external margin of the acetabular labrum.

Meniscal Ramp Lesion Repair Without the Need for a Posteromedial Portal

Medial meniscal ramp injury has gained the attention of orthopaedic surgeons in recent years. It consists of a tear of the peripheral insertion of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Its prevalence in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction varies between 9% and 40% according to different studies. Ramp lesions cannot always be diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging scans. To identify ramp lesions, the arthroscope should be introduced into the posteromedial compartment of the knee during the routine examination of the knee (Gillquist maneuver). Not all authors advocate systematically repairing ramp injuries of the medial meniscus, especially when these injuries are small and stable. They have historically been repaired using an outside-in technique using a hook-type suture passed through a posteromedial portal. In this study, we present our all-inside suture technique without the use of a posteromedial portal.

Meniscus-Side-Knot-tying Technique Instead of Capsular-Side-Knot-Tying in Arthroscopic Outside-In Meniscal Repair: A Small but Meaningful Modification

Arthroscopic outside-in meniscal repair technique, which was first described by Warren in 1985, including all its later modifications, involved tying the final knot on the outer surface of the capsule. Capsular-side knot-tying has reported complications such as catching sensory nerves under the knot with resultant postoperative focal sensory loss and paresthesia, as well as pain under the skin because of irritation from the knot. Meniscus-side-knot-tying technique involves tying the knot on the outer surface of the meniscus. Advantages of the meniscus-side knot-tying technique include the following: avoiding catching nerves under the knot; avoiding pain under the skin because of irritation from the knot; the tension of the sliding knot and the subsequent half hitches, which can be monitored accurately under vision; no skin incisions needed; no possibility of cutting the suture limbs while performing the skin incision between the two needle holes; and, the ability to suture tears in mobile parts of the meniscus without fixing them to the capsule like tears in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus.

All-inside suture meniscal repair using suture passer.

In recent years, to save the meniscus and prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis, the indications for meniscus repair have been expanding instead of partial menisectomy. Accordingly, various repair techniques for meniscus tears have been developed. The conventional inside-out and outside-in meniscus repair techniques and all-inside repair technique with an implant/anchor can be classified as trans-capsular (TC) repair from the perspective of suture with penetrating capsule. Recently, new suture passers for all-inside meniscus repair have been developed. To distinguish from conventional all-inside repair with implant/anchors, all-inside repair with only suture using these suture passers was described as all-inside suture (AIS) repair. This AIS repair could achieve meniscus-to-meniscus suture across the tear without interposition of soft tissues including the capsule between suture and meniscus, leading direct gap closing of torn edges. In this respect, AIS repair is considered to be "anatomical meniscus repair". Actually, some reports showed biomechanical and clinical advantages of AIS repair. However, there is still limited evidence in clinical practice. Moreover, there are some disadvantages for AIS repair. Not only further studies but also development of new devices and surgical techniques for AIS should be required. This review describes the current status of AIS repair for each type of tear.

The Inside-Out Technique of Deep Medial Collateral Ligament Release Could Provide Good Visualization during Knee Arthroscopy

During knee arthroscopy, clear vision of the intra-articular structures is essential. Two techniques have been described to aid in visualization by releasing the medial collateral ligament (MCL). The outside-in technique remains the most widely used, but injury to the saphenous nerve is one of the potential risks when performing this technique. On the other hand, the inside-out techniques for releasing the deep MCL (dMCL) tend to be safer since the procedure was done under direct visualization through an anteromedial portal. This study was a retrospective case series of 22 patients who underwent the dMCL release using an inside-out technique. The outcomes reported are medial joint space opening, neurovascular injury, and residual morbidities such as pain and valgus knee instability after the procedure.

Retrospective Study of Minimal Three-Year Follow-Up of Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: 5000 Multicenter Cases.

Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PTELD) and clarify the differences between outside-in and inside-out techniques. Methodology This was a multicenter retrospective study with a chart review of questionnaires about patients' quality of life. Patients were recruited from three hospitals in China. Based on certain inclusion and exclusion criteria, we enrolled in the study 5000 patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation who received PTELD from September 2015 to September 2019. The outside-in technique (n=2039) was compared with the inside-out technique for PTELD (n=1890) on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) of the Health Survey Questionnaire (physical component)both pre-operatively and post-operatively. Results VAS, ODI, andSF-36 significantly improved just after surgery for both techniques compared with pre-operative status. Nevertheless, significant differences existed between the two techniques concerning VAS for leg pain, VAS for back pain, ODI, and SF-36 at 0.5 monthspost-operatively. The above indices steadily improved within six months after both techniques, after which they did not significantly improve. In detail, outside-in patients suffered more back pain and worse ODI and SF-36 (physical) but had more relief from leg pain 0.5 months after surgery in terms of VAS. As for recovery rate from symptoms, there were only significant differences in recovery rate for leg pain and back pain at the first 1.5 months post-operatively. As for satisfaction rates, the outside-in technique had better results than the inside-out technique at both 0.5 months and 12 months. Conclusion Both techniques could relieve the symptoms of lumbar disc herniation. However, patients in the outside-in group suffered more back pain and a bigger risk of nerve injury than those in the inside-out group.

Modification of Outside-In Technique In Preparing Femoral Tunnel During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction—“PL-Portal Outside-In Technique”

We propose modifying the outside-in technique by adopting a posterolateral (PL) portal as the working portal to introduce the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) aiming guide while keeping the anteromedial portal as the viewing portal, the “PL-portal outside-in technique.” This modification facilitates the preparation of an anatomical femoral tunnel, even when preserving a “big” ACL remnant or in small joint scenarios, such as pediatric ACLR. There is a minimal learning curve in adopting this technique because a standard 30° arthroscope is used, and the viewing portal is anterior.

A new arthroscopic repair technique for triangular fibrocartilage complex using an intracapsular suture: an outside-in transfer all-inside repair

BackgroundArthroscopic repair is a promising, minimally invasive surgical technique for patients with Palmer type 1B peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears. Although several arthroscopic techniques are effective for repairing Palmer type 1B TFCC tears, some shortcomings remain. So, we report an arthroscopic repair technique for the treatment of Palmer type 1B Atzei class 1 TFCC tears using an intracapsular suture: an outside-in transfer all-inside repair.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 38 Palmer type 1B TFCC injury patients admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups. The group A was sutured from the outside to the inside, with a total of 21 cases; the group B was sutured with the new arthroscopic repair technique, with a total of 17 cases. Observe and compare the VAS scores and modified Mayo wrist function scores of all patients before 3, and 6 months after the operation and evaluate the incidence of thread knots in patients with different treatment methods. The methodology was performed an arthroscopic intracapsular suture using an outside-in transfer, all-inside repair technique, which is a modified method of the outside-in and all-inside technique using the needle of a 10-mL sterile syringe, for Palmer type 1B TFCC tears. A No. 2 polydioxanone suture was threaded through the needle and entered the wrist joint. Next, the needle was withdrawn carefully along the suture to the proximal tear ulnar surface of the TFCC and penetrated the TFCC, exiting the articular cavity surface of the ulnar side of the torn TFCC. Finally, arthroscopic knotting was performed.ResultsThis new treatment was as effective as the previously arthroscopic techniques and had the advantages of no additional incision and decreased risk of operation-related complications. The incidence of thread knots in the group A (28.57%) was significantly higher than that in the group B (0%), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in VAS score and modified Mayo wrist function scores between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThe outside-in transfer, the all-inside repair technique is suitable for Palmer type 1B Atzei class 1 TFCC tears. We recommend this technique as a useful alternative to the conventional methods of repairing Palmer type 1B TFCC tears.

Modified Outside-In Plus Suture Technique for Repair of the Anterior and Middle Segments of the Meniscus: Technical Note

Traditionally, an outside-in suture technique is appropriate to repair longitudinal tears of the anterior and middle segments of the meniscus. However, it has a fundamental weakness of not creating a vertical mattress–type suture. To overcome this weakness, the modified outside-in technique was developed using a suture hook to create a vertical mattress–type suture in the inner fragment. However, it still has the disadvantage of requiring an open skin incision to prevent neurovascular damage during knot tying. Thus, we developed the modified outside-in plus technique to make a vertical mattress suture without an open skin incision in the knee joint. With this technique, the use of both vertical and horizontal mattress sutures is possible. Although this technique is similar to the modified outside-in technique, a suture knot is made inside the knee joint. Therefore, it compensates for the disadvantage of the outside-in technique. The modified outside-in plus technique is able to achieve good reduction and sufficient stability through a vertical mattress suture technique without additional skin incisions.

The clinical efficacy and safety of outside-in transobturator sling with additional paraurethral fixation – The prospective longitudinal study

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition that affect 30–40% of women in their lifetime. Midurethral slings (MUS) either suprapubic or transobturator can be safely used in the surgical treatment of SUI. The aim of this study was to collect clinical long-term data regarding safety and performance of transobturator sling with an additional tape fixation in women with urinary incontinence. This prospective longitudinal study was conducted on a group of 2086 female patients diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence. Follow up visits where scheduled 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after surgery followed by annual checking when possible. Patients underwent transobturator sling procedure from 01.01.2011 to 31.12.2021. All patients had a monofilament tape inserted at the mid-urethra using outside-in technique (TOT) with 2 absorbable sutures parallel to the urethra. Success of surgery was defined as lack of any leakage during cough stress test whereas the subjective cure rate was determined by Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF). 87% of patients who were operated at least 10 years before assessment reported ICIQ –SF < 6. Main postoperative complications were storage symptoms – de novo urgency and voiding difficulties. TOT is safe and highly effective surgical treatment for (SUI) in a long-term observation.

Meniscal Circumferential Fiber Augmentation: A Biomechanical Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair Technique

Radial tears of the human knee meniscus result in the loss of circumferential hoop stress and are highly correlated with knee degeneration. Although a variety of surgical techniques are available to repair radial meniscal tears, including inside-out, outside-in, and all-inside techniques, conventional repair techniques focus only on stabilizing the damaged portion. This Technical Note describes a biomechanical meniscus repair technique of meniscal circumferential fiber augmentation, concomitant with conventional repair, to promote meniscal healing from a biomechanical perspective.

Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Anatomic Double-Bundle 2-in-1 Guide System

Background: In double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, tunnel coalition may occur intraoperatively or during the postoperative course. Tibial tunnel coalition is more common compared with femoral tunnel coalition. Once tunnel coalition occurs on the tibial side, rotatory knee laxity may not be controlled as expected. We have developed a new device to avoid tibial tunnel coalition with consistency. The purpose of this video is to present the surgical technique for double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a new drill guide. Indications: The novel guide may be used in all cases with confirmed ACL tear in a physically active patient, identical to indications for current ACL reconstruction using the double-bundle technique. Technique Description: The hamstring tendon is harvested for the ACL grafts. Two guide pins for the anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle for the tibial tunnel are inserted through the Anatomic Double-Bundle 2-in-1 Guide System. Cannulated drills and dilators are used to create the tunnel to the final diameter. Next, femoral tunnels are created by the outside-in technique using the Anatomic Double-Bundle 2-in-1 Guide System. Grafts are inserted from the tibia and passed through the femur. The grafts are fixed with a post screw and/or interference screw. Results: Two weeks after surgery, no tibial or femoral coalition (0/20 cases) were confirmed and tibial bony bridge at the intraarticular surface was measured 2.7 ± 0.9 mm using computed tomography (CT). One year after surgery, tibial coalition was confirmed in 13.3% (2/15 cases), and femoral coalition in 6.7% (1/15 cases) on CT image mainly due to tunnel widening. The 2 cases with tibial coalition had tibial bony bridge of less than 2 mm on immediate postoperative CT. Discussion/Conclusion: Using the novel guide, 2 tibial tunnels were created easily and accurately compared with the conventional independent drilling technique. The 2 tunnels can also be created simultaneously with single placement of the guide. Two separate tunnels help maintain expected rotatory knee stability after double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.