Price and yield risk are among the most important factors influencing the production and marketing actions of agricultural producers. Price risk is especially important to agricultural producers. In the survey which is the focus of this study, 67 percent of Kansas crop farmers indicated that output and/or input price uncertainty was the major source of risk faced by their farm operation. Price risk management is of continuing interest to producers as well as to academic researchers and extension educators. Methods for managing price risk include forward pricing, hedging, options trading, and commodity storage. Marketing practices of agricultural producers have received considerable attention in recent years. Much of this research has focused on producers' adoption of forward and futures pricing methods. Hill; Asplund, Forster, and Stout; Makus et al.; Shapiro and Brorsen; and Goodwin and Schroeder evaluated producers' adoption of forward pricing techniques. Through this research a better understanding of the characteristics of producers associated with one dimension of agricultural marketing, forward pricing, has emerged. In general, these studies have revealed that the adoption of forward pricing techniques increases with farm size, producer education, and financial leverage. Although recent research has enhanced understanding of forward pricing adoption, almost no information exists about the frequency of marketing (the total number of times in a crop year that a portion of the crop is sold). While state-wide crop marketing percentages are readily available by month, little is known about individual producer behavior, and in particular marketing frequency. Marketing and risk management plans have become increasingly complex and in many cases involve more frequent marketings. Knowledge about the relationships between producers' chara teristics and their marketings frequencies will add to the current understanding of producer marke ing practices. This research should be of interest to those providing marketing advisory serv ces, helping them to better target their clientele. F r example, a marketing advisory firm whose comparative advantage lies in multiplemarketings strategies should be especially interes ed in understanding factors that may be associated with marketing frequency. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the frequency of crop marketings for a sample of 572 Kansas wheat, corn, milo (grain sorghum), and soybean producers.' Characteristics of the producers and farm operations will be evaluated for their effects on the frequency of marketing.