Outpatient Psychiatric Care Research Articles

Evaluating Implementation and Outcomes of the Achieving Depression and Anxiety Patient-Centered Treatment Collaborative Care Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care System: A Mixed Methods Observational Study Protocol.

Background Collaborative care is an evidence-based multidisciplinary model shown to improve patient depression and anxiety outcomes. Although there is robust literature showing the effectiveness of collaborative care on depression and anxiety symptoms, there is little published on outcomes of collaborative care implementation or the efficacy of collaborative care compared with psychiatric referrals. Reported here is a study protocol examining a novel depression and anxiety collaborative care program in a large, integrated health care system. Methods This is a mixed methods study of the Achieving Depression and Anxiety Patient-Centered Treatment (ADAPT) program as compared to outpatient psychiatric care at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large, integrated health care delivery system. The ADAPT program was designed using collaborative care principles, including measurement-based care, accurate diagnosis, and population management. Eligible participants will be ≥ 18 years old with mild to moderate-severe depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Exclusion criteria include acute suicide risk and serious mental health comorbidities. Implementation is examined using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and interviews with program stakeholders. Results Pending. Conclusion Study data will help inform future collaborative care efforts while expanding the literature base. The Achieving Depression and Anxiety Patient-Centered Treatment program may improve patient outcomes and access to quality depression and/or anxiety care.

Secondary psychiatric care patients’ experiences of internet CBT for insomnia – a qualitative study

BackgroundInsomnia is very common, especially among psychiatric patients in secondary care. It is experienced as a 24 h problem affecting several domains of life. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is widely regarded as the first-line treatment and often improves comorbid disorders. Despite this, many patients are not offered CBT-I. Internet based CBT for insomnia (iCBT-I) is just as effective as face-to-face treatments and could considerably increase availability. However, it is unclear whether iCBT-I is suitable for patients with more severe and comorbid psychiatric illnesses in secondary care.MethodsEleven Swedish participants (24–68 years old) in outpatient secondary psychiatric care who underwent iCBT-I treatment were interviewed. The semi-structured interviews were analysed using content analysis. The purpose was to map their experiences, motivation and suggestions for improvement.ResultsPrior to the treatment, most participants were highly motivated to take the opportunity to address their insomnia. The treatment was perceived as well-structured and interesting. The most difficult aspect was counteracting the fatigue. It was also hard to continue the treatment when faced with major life events. During this phase, contact with the therapist motivated them to continue the treatment. Several desired more face-to-face meetings. It was also motivating to gain insights into and a sense of control over sleep. Several described better sleep, improved daily routines, a more predictable everyday life and increased energy. Daytime well-being was improved in some, partly because they had more energy but also because they filled their days with more activities.ConclusionThe treatment has the potential to be very useful in secondary psychiatric care where insomnia is common and affects comorbid disorders. Psychiatric patients might have more difficulties continuing with iCBT-I treatment, but those who manage to complete the program have a good chance of obtaining benefit. Extensive psychological groundwork early in treatment is likely to pay off later when motivation is needed. Additional social support and other adjustments may also enhance treatment outcomes. Participants’ stories are particularly valuable, as therapists and treatment developers receive less feedback from patients in internet-based treatments compared to face-to-face treatments.

Racial/ethnic discrimination and suicide-related risk in a treatment-seeking group of ethnoracially minoritized adolescents.

Despite growing evidence demonstrating the negative mental health effects of racism-related experiences, racial/ethnic discrimination is seldom examined in youth suicide risk. The present study tested the association between racial/ethnic discrimination and well-supported correlates of suicide-related risk including emotion reactivity and dysregulation, and severity of psychiatric symptoms in a sample of ethnoracially minoritized adolescents receiving outpatient psychiatric services. Participants were adolescents (N = 46; 80.4% female; 65.2% Latinx) who ranged in age from 13-20 years old (M=15.42; SD=1.83) recruited from a child outpatient psychiatry clinic in a low-resourced community in Northeast US. Youth completed a clinical interview and a battery of surveys. Findings from separate linear regression models show that increases in frequency of racial/ethnic discrimination were associated with increases in severity of suicidal ideation (SI), independent of emotion reactivity and dysregulation, and symptoms of PTSD and depression. Discriminatory experiences involving personal insults, witnessing family being discriminated, and school-based contexts were uniquely associated with SI. Preliminary findings support the association between racial/ethnic discrimination and increased severity of suicide-related risk in ethnoracially minoritized adolescents. Accounting for racial/ethnic discrimination may improve the cultural responsiveness of youth suicide prevention strategies within outpatient psychiatric care.

A Rapid Review of "Low-Threshold" Psychiatric Medication Prescribing: Considerations for Street Medicine and Beyond.

No widely accepted clinical guidelines, and scant directly applicable pragmatic research, are available to guide the prescription of psychiatric medications in "low-threshold" outpatient settings, such as street outreach, urgent care, and crisis care, as well as walk-in, shelter, and bridge and transition clinics. Providers frequently prescribe medications in these settings without patients' having firm psychiatric diagnoses and without medical records to guide clinical decision making. Persons who receive medications in these settings often seek help voluntarily and intermittently for mental illness symptoms. However, because of structural and individual factors, such patients may not engage in longitudinal outpatient psychiatric care. The authors reviewed the literature on psychiatric medication prescribing in low-threshold settings and offer clinical considerations for such prescribing. The authors conducted a rapid literature review (N=2,215 abstracts), which was augmented with up-to-date clinical prescribing literature, the authors' collective clinical experience, and DSM-5 section II diagnostic criteria to provide considerations for prescribing medications in low-threshold settings. For individuals for whom diagnostic uncertainty is prominent, a symptom-based diagnostic and treatment approach may be best suited to weigh the risks and benefits of medication use in low-threshold settings. Practical considerations for treating patients with clinical presentations of psychosis and trauma, as well as mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders, in low-threshold settings are discussed. An urgent need exists to invest in pragmatic research and guideline development to delineate best-practice prescribing in low-threshold settings.

Mental health service areas in Switzerland.

Small area analysis is a health services research technique that facilitates geographical comparison of services supply and utilization rates between health service areas (HSAs). HSAs are functionally relevant regions around medical facilities within which most residents undergo treatment. We aimed to identify HSAs for psychiatric outpatient care (HSA-PSY) in Switzerland. We used HSAr, a new and automated methodological approach, and comprehensive psychiatric service use data from insurances to identify HSA-PSY based on travel patterns between patients' residences and service sites. Resulting HSA-PSY were compared geographically, demographically and regarding the use of inpatient and outpatient psychiatric services. We identified 68 HSA-PSY, which were reviewed and validated by local mental health services experts. The population-based rate of inpatient and outpatient service utilization varied considerably between HSA-PSY. Utilization of inpatient and outpatient services tended to be positively associated across HSA-PSY. Wide variation of service use between HSA-PSY can hardly be fully explained by underlying differences in the prevalence or incidence of disorders. Whether other factors such as the amount of services supply did add to the high variation should be addressed in further studies, for which our functional mapping on a small-scale regional level provides a good analytical framework.

Co-payment and adolescents' use of psychologist treatment: Spill over effects on mental health care and on suicide attempts.

The literature around co-payment shows evidence of increasing consumption following reduced co-payment. We apply difference-in-difference methods to assess the effect of abolishing the co-payment on psychologist treatment of anxiety and depression in 18 to 21-year olds. We apply nationwide individual level data with individuals close to this age interval as control group. The population amounts to approximately 1.2 million individuals and a total of 51 million patient months of observations. We show that after removing co-payment, the use of psychologist treatment almost doubles. We find that this increase involves moderately positive spill over effects on outpatient psychiatric care and on prescriptions of antidepressants. In the heterogeneity analysis we find evidence of higher effects on adolescents from families with lower income, indicating that reduced co-payments may increase equality in access. We also see that effects are higher for individuals listed with general practitioners (GPs) with a reluctant referral style; indicating that these GPs' behavior is affected by patient co-payment rates. Interestingly, we find evidence of significant reductions in suicide attempts - primarily among high-income women and low-income men. This indicates that better access to mental health care for adolescents may have a positive impact on their mental health and well-being.

Referral to aftercare following inpatient withdrawal treatment and readmission: retrospective chart review of patients with substance use disorders.

Aftercare following inpatient withdrawal treatment improves the prognosis and prevents future readmissions in patients with substance use disorders. According to the stepped care approach, the setting and intensity of aftercare should be adjusted to the patients' specific needs and resources. This study evaluated the real-life referral to different types of aftercare in Switzerland and the rate of inpatient readmission within a 1-year follow-up. All substance use disorder patients admitted for inpatient withdrawal treatment in a Swiss psychiatric hospital between January and December 2016 (n = 497) were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical records and their impact on the likelihood of being referred to a particular type of aftercare (general practitioner, psychiatric outpatient care, psychiatric day clinic, inpatient rehabilitation programme) was evaluated. For each type of referral, we determined the readmission rate within one year after discharge. In the sample of substance use disorder patients (mean age 41 years; 69% male), alcohol use disorder was by far the most frequent substance use disorder. Most patients were referred to psychiatric outpatient care (39.8%), followed by a general practitioner (31.0%), inpatient rehabilitation (19.3%) and psychiatric day clinic (9.9%). Patient characteristics that point to an unfavourable course of disease, including higher symptom severity, history of more than two previous admissions, compulsory admission and treatment discontinuation, were associated with a higher likelihood to be referred to lower-level aftercare (general practitioner, psychiatric outpatient care), whereas patients with lower symptom severity, fewer than two previous admissions, voluntary admission and regular discharge were more likely to be referred to high-intensity aftercare (psychiatric day clinic, inpatient rehabilitation). The readmission rate after one year did not differ between the different settings of aftercare (range 40.4-42.9%). The findings of this study suggest that patients suffering from severe substance use disorders and/or from an unfavourable course of disease who would benefit from a more intensive aftercare setting, such as psychiatric day clinics or inpatient rehabilitation programs, might be under-treated, whereas patients with a rather favourable prognosis might similarly benefit from a less intensive treatment setting, such as psychiatric outpatient care. Regarding the comparable readmission rates, we recommend considering more efficient resource management by promoting stepped care approaches for substance use disorders and establishing standardised placement criteria in Switzerland.

A patient perspective on non-attendance for psychotherapy in psychiatric outpatient care for patients with affective disorders

To explore the phenomenon of non-attendance for psychotherapy in psychiatric outpatient care for patients with affective disorders. Ten patients, seven women and three men, aged 25–51 years, agreed to participate in the study. The participants were recruited from a psychiatric outpatient clinic for patients with affective disorders at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. A semi-structured interview guide was used during the interviews, which were audiotaped, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. All informants expressed concern that they had been absent from booked appointments. The main reason given was that the mental illness that caused the need for treatment also caused the absence. They expressed ambiguity about the goals and method of treatment and showed ambivalence regarding the possibility of being helped and achieving change. The participants also highlighted shortcomings in communication with the psychologist regarding their non-attendance. Four themes were generated: A vicious circle, Processes without direction, Ambivalence and Inadequate communication. The study shows that missed appointments have a negative effect on the treatment process. If the patient and the psychologist jointly decide to start psychotherapy, it is thus important that the psychologist promptly addresses the problem of missed appointments and takes a professional responsibility for limiting the risk of another failed attempt at psychotherapy. In some cases, it is necessary to consider whether psychotherapy is an appropriate form of treatment or not. Practitioner points The study shows the importance of a careful assessment phase, where questions about motivation, goals and previous experiences of missed appointments are examined. The informants were not able to raise the issue of missed appointments in a larger perspective; their but focus was rather on the current symptom burden. It is therefore the responsibility of the psychologist to raise the issue and maintain a dialogue about goals, direction and evaluation of the psychotherapy. The psychologist bears a professional responsibility to limit the risk of another failed attempt to provide psychotherapy.

Detained Persons Incarcerated for the First Time and Needing Acute Psychiatric Care: Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics.

Among detained persons, those incarcerated for the first time (FTI: first time incarceration) are known to present long-standing psychological vulnerability but also suffer significant deterioration of their mental health during the first year following imprisonment. Whether the patterns of psychiatric morbidity differ in FTI cases compared to cases with repeated and long term incarceration (RLTI) is still a matter of debate. We examined the sociodemographic and clinical differences between a subgroup of FTI vs. one of RLTI in a series of 139 randomly selected detained persons admitted to an acute psychiatric ward located in the central prison of Geneva, Switzerland. Fisher exact, unpaired Student t and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to explore sociodemographic (age, gender, marital status, religion, knowledge of French, education) and clinical (psychiatric outpatient care, suicidal behavior, psychiatric diagnosis) differences between the two groups. Subsequently, univariate and multiple logistic regression models were used to detect the variables associated with FTI. The proportion of women was significantly higher in the FTI compared to the RLTI group. FTI cases were also more frequently separated or divorced, with less frequent religious affiliation. 16.9% of FTI cases but only 1.3% of RLTI cases had a clinical diagnosis of depression. In multiple regression models, female sex and lower religious affiliation rate were associated with FTI status. Among diagnostic categories, depression was strongly related to FTI status both in univariate and multivariable models. Importantly, this was not the case for adjustment disorders, previous history of psychiatric care and suicidal behavior. Our observations support the assumption that FTI cases with lower affective support, less religious investment and without psychiatric care prior to imprisonment are particularly vulnerable to depressive illness.

Patients’ online access to psychiatric records: Providers’ experiences

IntroductionPatients attending psychiatric specialist health services in Northern Norway have since 2015 had the opportunity to access their medical records online. Prior to implementation, there were some concerns in the professional field that patient accessible electronic health records might introduce some challenges.Objectives In this study, we asked psychiatric providers in outpatient psychiatric care about the impact of patients’ online access to documentation practices and whether they felt the access impacted the provider-patient relationship. We also examined whether the providers sought to deny patients’ access to any information.Methods16 qualitative in-depth interviews were performed with mental health providers working in the specialist services in North Norway. Participants had different professional backgrounds, and included doctors, nurses, psychologists and others. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were qualitatively analyzed by means of the framework method.ResultsThe providers varied in their encouragement of patients’ online access, but few expressed concerns. There had been little specific training on how to optimize the writing of notes to accomodate patients’ online acces, but several pointed out that there had been an increased focus on the importance of adapting the notes to promote understanding. Increased transparency was in general seen positively, but the service might not fit all patient categories. Very few patients were denied access. In most cases, the service could improve the patients’ understanding of the treatment and the provider-patient relationship.ConclusionsWhile some voiced caveats, patients’ online access was in general seen as beneficial to the treatment and the provider-patient relationship.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Outpatient Psychiatric Care Not for the Poor—What Is Our Obligation?

Outpatient Psychiatric Care Not for the Poor—What Is Our Obligation?

“Protect, test, vaccinate”: dealing with Covid-19 in outpatient psychiatric care

IntroductionCurbing the spread of the coronavirus and stabilizing the overall psychosocial situation requires compliance with preventive measures: “Protect, test, vaccinate”.ObjectivesPopulation groups with psychosocial problems which are difficult to reach and have a high risk of infection, morbidity and mortality as well as unfavorable help-seeking behavior and generally lower vaccination rates need support.MethodsIn the outpatient psychiatric facilities of the Psychosocial Services in Vienna (PSD-Wien), specific concepts to support “protect, test, vaccinate” were implemented to protect patients and employees. Information about the benefits and risks of vaccination, relieving fears and support in registering and attending vaccination appointments were of special significance.ResultsAnalyzes of selected data from 1,319 patients at PSD-Wien show (period: 1st half of 2021) that these measures made it possible to achieve a significantly higher vaccination willingness in people with severe mental illnesses (84 %) than in the general Austrian population (based on the date of examination, currently approximately 60 %). The same applies to vaccination rates: at least 47 % have received a partial vaccination, of which about half have already received both partial vaccinations.ConclusionsHigh vaccination willingness and rates as well as the necessary protection (wearing masks, keeping distance, complying with hygiene rules) and regular testing must not be a phenomenon of privileged population groups. Psychosocial support is needed so that the trilogy “Protect, test, vaccinate” becomes possible for everyone, including people with severe mental illnesses. Social psychiatry is not just about mental health, but also about physical health care and prevention.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Patient adherence to out-patient psychiatric care for neurotic and affective disorders (Should I stay, or should I go?)

IntroductionReferral is not a necessity for a patient who wants to get psychiatrist consultation in Latvia. The good thing about it is the availability and the possibility to consult with highest educated mental health specialist for any person in society without barriers. On the other hand, there is an overwhelming work load for psychiatrists.ObjectivesTo explore the prevalence of self-referred patients in out-patient care and the adherence to psychiatrist recommendations.Methods The medical documentation of all consecutive first-time out-patient center “Pardaugava” psychiatrist patients over the period of 01.01.2020. to 30.04.2020. with one year follow-up was analyzed.Results236 patients were included in the study, 31.2% of them were men. The average age was 49 (SD ± 22.65) years. Patients with Affective (F3X) and Neurotic (F4X) disorders were self-referred more often compared to Organic mental (F0X) disorder or other spectrum patients (83.3% and 77.5% vs 33.3% or 56.0%, p<0.001). Median appointment count was 4, higher in F4X (6) and lower in F3X patients (2). Majority of F4X patients (61,6%) did not follow the recommendations or stopped seeing psychiatrist, while only 13,7% were persistent. Сonversely, 48,4% of F3X patients followed the recommendations and only 43,5% stopped. In comparison, other spectrum patients followed recommendations in 32.0% of cases and ignored - in 56.6%.ConclusionsPatients were actively self-referring themselves to psychiatrist. Highest adherence to psychiatrist recommendations was found in patients with affective disorders compared to other spectrum patients. In contrast, adherence was the lowest in patients with neurotic disorders.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Provision of psychiatric community treatment in the context of a pandemic of a new coronavirus infection abroad (review article)

This review analyzes the foreign experience of providing community psychiatric care in the context of a pandemic of a new coronavirus infection. The situation that has arisen in the context of a pandemic of a new coronavirus infection has become unprecedented and has made adjustments in the provision of medical care, including psychiatric. Patients with mental illness are themselves more vulnerable to infection, spread and complications of coronavirus infection. They often violate the self-isolation regime, do not perform protective measures, and suffer from comorbid pathology (obesity, diabetes, hypertension). As it turned out, the coronavirus affects the concentration of some psychotropic drugs in the blood, and it also becomes difficult to prescribe others with the development of complications of COVID-19. The need to convert the hospital bed capacity into infectious diseases has led to a reduction in the number of places in round-the-clock psychiatric hospitals and the duration of treatment in them. All these aggravating factors contributed to the priority development of outpatient psychiatric care in comparison with inpatient in a pandemic. Assertive community treatment has undergone a number of changes: the number of home visits compared to visits to health facilities has increased, prescription durations or medication provision have been increased for stable patients, and there has been an increase in the switch from oral to long-acting injectables. Many researchers note that the pandemic has positively contributed to the rapid introduction and spread of telemedicine, but also emphasize that this should not be to the detriment of the patient. The experience of providing psychiatric care in a pandemic is gradually accumulating and systematizing, which is necessary in the future, since these realities are likely to be repeated.

Psychometric Properties of the Verbal and Social Interaction Questionnaire for Psychiatric Outpatient Care (VSI-OP), Staff and Patient Versions

The aim of this paper is to investigate the psychometric properties of the Verbal and Social Interaction questionnaire for psychiatric outpatient care (VSI-OP) by using a confirmatory factor analysis. A further aim is to present the patient and staff perceptions of the frequency of these interactions in this context. The factor structure of the VSI-OP could be explained by three factors for both the staff and the patient versions. The three factors are: ‘Inviting the patient to establish a relationship’, ‘Showing interest in the patients’ feelings, experiences and behaviour’ and ‘Helping the patients to establish structure and routines in their everyday life’. The two first factors were the most frequently occurring actions according to the staff and the patients.

Screening for ADHD in a general outpatient psychiatric sample of adults

Adults (n = 805) seeking outpatient psychiatric care completed the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) and measures of impairment and co-occurring psychopathology as part of a measurement-based care initiative. Diagnostic indicators of ADHD (i.e., formal diagnosis and/or medication treatment) were recorded from the electronic medical record (EMR). Agreement between screening positive for ADHD and EMR indicators for the diagnosis was explored, and clinical characteristics of adults identified with ADHD using these indicators were examined. Lastly, the contribution of ADHD to functional impairment was examined, controlling for the contribution of other demographic and psychiatric comorbidities. In the full sample, 54.78% of adults screened positive for ADHD based on the ASRS, and using EMR indicators, only 11.93% of adults were identified with ADHD. Agreement emerged between self-reported ADHD and ADHD EMR indicators, although adults screening positive for ADHD generally reported greater psychiatric complexity relative to adults identified with ADHD in the EMR. ADHD was associated with clinical impairment even when controlling for other psychiatric comorbidities. The considerable difference in prevalence of ADHD based on self-report screening versus EMR indicators suggests that ADHD may be overlooked in adult psychiatric care. Findings point to the importance of assessing adult ADHD in routine psychiatric care.

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of cognitive adaptation training in long-term inpatient facilities for people diagnosed with severe mental illness: A nursing perspective.

Accessible SummaryWhat is known on the subject? To date, the majority of the research regarding innovative psychosocial interventions in psychiatry focuses upon the development and effectiveness of the interventions. Despite the fact that these are important clinical and scientific contributions, only a small percentage of the evidence‐based interventions reach clinical practice.Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is an effective psychosocial intervention to increase daily functioning and cognitive functioning in people diagnosed with severe mental illness (SMI) in inpatient and outpatient psychiatric care.Despite knowledge on the intervention's effectiveness, systematic use of CAT in the daily routine of mental health nurses is insufficient. What the paper adds to existing knowledge? To date, no research is available that describes the factors associated to the implementation of CAT from a nursing perspective.This research also adds to the literature on rehabilitation in people diagnosed with SMI in an inpatient setting.The results contribute to the science of implementing interventions in long‐term psychiatric care and may help future interventions in their implementation process. What are the implications for practice? This study highlights that multiple factors need to be considered when implementing an intervention in routine care and that it is a complicated process.Future implementation initiatives require ongoing training and supervision of CAT specialists, appointment of local champions to increase commitment among nursing staff and inclusion and commitment of management to overcome organizational barriers.Without acknowledging the presence of barriers to implementation and considering strategies to overcome these barriers, sustainable implementation is likely to be unsuccessful. IntroductionEvidence‐based interventions in psychiatry often fail to reach clinical practice. Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is an evidence‐based psychosocial intervention that aims to improve daily functioning of people diagnosed with a severe mental illness. Implementation of CAT remains challenging, despite demonstrated effectiveness.AimIdentifying facilitators and barriers of CAT on the intervention, nursing, and organizational levels, and investigating relationships between capability, opportunity, motivation, and appraisal using the COM‐B model.MethodThe Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations and CAT‐specific questions were administered to 46 nurses. The relationship among capability, opportunity, motivation and appraisal was calculated using the Pearson's r correlation coefficient.ResultsNine barriers (mostly organizational level) and 13 facilitators (mostly intervention and nursing level) were identified. Significant moderate correlations were found between capability and opportunity, capability and motivation, capability and appraisal and a strong correlation between motivation and appraisal.DiscussionThe results suggest that barriers at the organizational level should be removed and facilitators at intervention and nursing levels may be exploited to improve implementation.Implications for practiceFuture implementation initiatives require ongoing training and supervision of CAT specialists, appointment of local champions to increase commitment among nursing staff and inclusion and commitment of management to overcome organizational barriers.

Prison inmates with court-ordered treatments: are they really different?

BackgroundBoth the frequency of court-ordered treatments (COT) for offenders and prevalence of mental disorders among regular prison inmates steadily increased in most western countries. Whether there are major sociodemographic and clinical differences between these two populations is still matter of debate.MethodsWe compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in a representative sample of 139 regular prison inmates versus 61 offenders with COT admitted during a 5-year period in an acute psychiatric care unit located in the central prison of the Geneva county. Fisher exact, unpaired Student’s t and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare demographic and clinical variables between COT patients and regular inmates. In addition, univariate and multivariable ordered logistic regression models were built to identify the sociodemographic and clinical determinants of COT.ResultsCOT patients were significantly older, less frequently married, with better education attainment, predominantly French-speaking, of the Christian religious group and with regular religious practice. History of psychiatric outpatient care was significantly more frequent in this group. Unlike the significantly higher occurrence of adjustment disorders in regular prisoners, psychosis was the main diagnosis in COT patients. When all diagnostic categories were taken into account in multivariable models, the presence of personality and psychotic disorders were the stronger predictors of COT status.ConclusionsOur data reveal that offenders with COT represent a clinically distinct group with an overrepresentation of personality and psychotic disorders. Moreover, they show that, at least in the Swiss penitentiary system, COT patients are less exposed to acculturation issues compared to regular inmates.

The effects of national mental health plans on mental health services development in Chile: retrospective interrupted time series analyses of national databases between 1990 and 2017

AimsTo describe changes in mental health services in Chile between 1990 and 2017, and to retrospectively assess the effects of national mental health plans (NMHPs) on mental health services development during this period.MethodsService data (beds in psychiatric hospitals, psychiatric beds in general hospitals, forensic psychiatric beds, beds in protected housing facilities, psychiatric day hospital places, and outpatient mental health care centers) were retrieved from government sources in Chile. Data were reported as rates per 100,000 population. We conducted interrupted time series analyses, using ordinary least-square regressions with Newey-West standard errors, to assess the effects of the 1993 and 2000 NMPHs on mental health services development.ResultsRates of short- and long-stay beds in psychiatric hospitals (per 100,000 population) were reduced from 4.3 to 3.2 and from 19.0 to 2.0 over the entire time span, respectively. The strongest reduction of short- and long-stay beds in psychiatric hospitals was seen between the 1993 and 2000 NMHPs (annual removal of − 0.14 and − 1.03, respectively). We observed increased rates of psychiatric beds in general hospitals from 1.8 to 4.0, beds in protected housing facilities from 0.4 to 10.2, psychiatric day hospital places from 0.4 to 5.0, outpatient mental health care centers from 0.1 to 0.8 and forensic psychiatric beds from 0.3 to 1.1 over the entire time span. The strongest annual increase of rates of psychiatric beds in general hospitals (0.09), beds in protected housing facilities (0.50), psychiatric day hospital places (0.16) and outpatient mental health care centers (0.04) were observed after the 2000 NMHP. Forensic psychiatric beds increased in the year 2007 (0.58) due to the opening of a new facility.ConclusionsThe majority of acute care psychiatric beds in Chile now are based in general hospitals. The strong removal of short- and long-stay beds from psychiatric hospitals after the 1993 NMHP preceded substantial expansion of more modern mental health services in general hospitals and in the community. Only after the 2000 NMHP, the implementation of new mental health services gained momentum. Reiterative policies are needed to readjust mental health services development.

Contact with psychiatric care prior to suicide: are there differences between migrants and the majority population in Sweden? A cohort study of 12 474 persons who died by suicide between 2006 and 2016

The aim of this study was to determine possible differences in psychiatric care contact and the type of contact in the year prior to suicide by migrant status and region of origin compared to Swedish persons. A population-based open cohort design, using linked national registers, to study all individuals aged 20-64 years who died by suicide between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016 in Sweden (N = 12 474). The primary exposure was migrant status compared to the Swedish majority population in the following categories: non-refugee migrants, refugee migrants and children of migrants. The secondary exposure was region of origin in seven regions: Sweden, other Nordic countries, Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, Asia, the Americas and Oceania. The four outcomes were psychiatric in- and outpatient care, prescribed and purchased psychotropic medication and a variable composing the other variables, all measured the year before death. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, income and marital status estimated the likelihood of psychiatric care utilisation by type of care within the year prior to death by migrant status and region of origin (individually and combined). Out of all who had died by suicide, 81% had had psychiatric care of any type in the year before death by suicide. Among refugees the prevalence of psychiatric care before death by suicide was 88%. Compared with the Swedish reference group, non-refugees and persons from Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa had a lower likelihood of utilising psychiatric care prior to suicide driven by a lower use of prescribed psychotropic medication. Persons from the Middle East and North Africa had a higher likelihood, driven by higher use of psychiatric outpatient care and prescribed psychotropic medication. Non-refugees' likelihood of utilising care before death by suicide was lower within the first 5 years of living in Sweden. A large share of those who die by suicide use psychiatric care the year before they die. Non-refugee migrants and persons from Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa have a lower likelihood of utilising psychiatric care prior to suicide compared to Swedish, whereas persons from the Middle East and North Africa have a higher likelihood. Health care and policy makers should consider both migrant status, region of origin and time in the new country for further suicide prevention efforts.