Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are known to have a high rate of occurrence among athletes. The growing prevalence of these injuries demands research in this field to determine clinically reliable diagnostic techniques. Aims: The goal of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the lever sign test with other frequently used manual tests, such as the anterior drawer and Lachman test, and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the lever sign test in the diagnosis of ACL injuries. Study Design: The study was conducted for a period of 1 year, from November 2021 to November 2022, among 100 patients presenting to orthopedic outpatient department in a tertiary care center with complaints of acute knee pain after a trauma to the knee. Materials and Methods: A thorough history, physical examination, and three manual tests for diagnosing an ACL tear were performed by an intern, orthopedic resident, and consultant after obtaining consent. Arthroscopy of the injured knee was taken as the reference standard. Results: Of 100 patients, 53 were surgical and 67 were nonsurgical; the mean patient age was 33 years (range, 16 + 6.38 years). The overall accuracy of the lever sign test was 83% (85% sensitivity and 81% specificity); the accuracy was almost similar at arrival and under anesthesia (at arrival 86%, under anesthesia 80%), when performed by interns, postgraduates, and consultants. Conclusion: The lever sign test is easier to perform, equally efficacious, and reliable in diagnosing ACL injuries when compared to the other conventionally used manual tests.
Read full abstract