The Cardiostim team and Prof. Aladar Ronaszeki organised an educational meeting in Budapest from April 6 to 8 entitled “Pacing and Haemodynamics: Art of Timing”. This European congress has been an opportunity to discuss the haemodynamic effects of the various modes of pacing available, and more specifically Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) for heart failure patients. The reader will find below the 101 abstracts selected among the 156 received, printed in three different sections: conventional pacing, CRT, and a small set of abstracts on ablation techniques, which will not receive comment. Many investigations have demonstrated the deleterious effects of right ventricular (RV) apical pacing. Padeletti et al. (for the WHERE study) elegantly show the benefit of preserving spontaneous AV conduction in comparison with RV apical pacing, in DDD paced patients, via PEA measurements. PEA, which has been demonstrated to be closely correlated with LV d P /d t , significantly increases when patients are not RV paced, and decreases when they are RV paced. PEA variations parallel clinical outcomes and echo parameter values. When pacing is necessary, there is still controversy about the optimal RV pacing site. Direct His bundle pacing is feasible and safe (Catanzariti et al.), but requires normal function of the bundle branches and Purkinje system. Implantation is also difficult to perform. Long term reliability of His pacing is unknown. For Kutarski et al., RV outflow tract (RVOT) pacing is preferable to RV apical pacing. But for van Gelder, RV apical pacing is preferred for CRT patients. In our experience, RVOT and RV apical pacing provide similar haemodynamic results on average, but may induce significant individual differences. To help to understand individual requirements, one of the main targets for manufacturers is to propose haemodynamic sensors that could evaluate and guide the benefits of various pacing sites, such as …
Read full abstract