Outcomes Of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Research Articles

Comprehensive analysis of stereotactic Radiosurgery outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The influence of immunotherapy and prognostic factors

IntroductionBreast cancer stands as the second most common solid tumors with a propensity for brain metastasis. Among metastatic breast cancer cases, the brain metastasis incidence ranges from 10 % to 30 %, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displaying a heightened risk and poorer prognosis. SRS has emerged as an effective local treatment modality for brain metastases; however, data on its outcomes specifically in pure triple-negative subtype remain scarce. MethodWe retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all brain metastasis (BM) TNBC patients treated with SRS. Patient, tumour characteristics and treatment details data were collected. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate local control (LC), distant brain metastasis free survival (DBMFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in TNBC patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases while identifying potential prognostic factors. ResultForty-three patients with TNBC and brain metastases treated with SRS between January 2017 and 2023 were included. The study found rates of LC (99 % at 1 year) and DBMFS (76 % at 1 year) after SRS, with brain metastasis count (p = 0,003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0,001) being significant predictors of DBMFS. The median OS following SRS was 19.5 months, with neurological deficit (p = 0.003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0.019) identified as significant predictors of OS. ConclusionSRS demonstrates favourable outcomes in terms of local control and distant brain metastasis-free survival in TNBC. Neurological deficit and systemic treatment significantly influence overall survival, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches and (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI surveillance based on these factors.

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Radiosurgery in Treating Benign Meningiomas: A Dose Comparison Study from a Single-Center Analysis.

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of radiation dose on the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign meningiomas and determine an optimal dosing strategy for balancing tumor control and treatment-related toxicity. Clinical data of 147 patients with 164 lesions treated between 2014 and 2022 were reviewed. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local control rate (LCR), and radiation-induced toxicity, with secondary outcomes focusing on LCR and radiation-induced peritumoral edema (PTE) in two dose groups (≥14 Gy and <14 Gy). The results revealed a median follow-up duration of 47 months, with 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year PFS rates of 99.3%, 96.7%, and 93.8%, respectively, and an overall LCR of 95.1%. Radiation-induced toxicity was observed in 24.5% of patients, primarily presenting mild symptoms. Notably, no significant difference in LCR was found between the two dose groups (p = 0.628), while Group 2 (<14 Gy) exhibited significantly lower PTE (p = 0.039). This study concludes that SRS with a radiation dose < 14 Gy demonstrates comparable tumor control with reduced toxicity, advocating consideration of such dosing to achieve a balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Association of the combined stereotactic radiosurgery and embolization strategy and long-term outcomes in brain arteriovenous malformations with a volume ≤10 mL: a nationwide multicenter observational prospective cohort study

BackgroundTo compare the long-term outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without prior embolization in brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (volume ≤10 mL) for which SRS is indicated.MethodsPatients were recruited from...

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a prospective study using the NeuroPoint Alliance Stereotactic Radiosurgery Registry.

The literature on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs) managed using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relies mainly on single-institution studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There is a literature gap on clinical and radiological outcomes of SRS for NSCLC metastases in real-world practice. The objective of this study was to benchmark mortality and progression outcomes in patients undergoing SRS for NSCLC BMs and identify risk factors for these outcomes using a national quality registry. The SRS Registry of the NeuroPoint Alliance was used for this study. This registry included patients from 16 enrolling sites who underwent SRS from 2017 to 2022. Data are prospectively collected without a prespecified research purpose. The main outcomes of this analysis were overall survival (OS), out-of-field recurrence, local progression, and intracranial progression. All time-to-event investigations included Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regressions. Two hundred sixty-four patients were identified, with a mean age of 66.7 years and a female proportion of 48.5%. Most patients (84.5%) had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80-100, and the mean baseline EQ-5D score was 0.539 quality-adjusted life years. A single lesion was present in 53.4% of the patients, and 29.1% of patients had 3 or more lesions. The median OS was 28.1 months, and independent predictors of mortality included no control of primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1), KPS of 80 (HR 2.4) or lower (HR 2.4), coronary artery disease (HR 2.8), and 5 or more lesions present at the time of SRS treatment (HR 2.3). The median out-of-field progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.8 months, and the median local PFS was unreached. Intralesional hemorrhage was an independent risk factor of local progression, with an HR of 6.0. The median intracranial PFS was 14.0 months and was predicted by the number of lesions at the time of SRS (3-4 lesions, HR 2.2; 5-14 lesions, HR 2.5). In this real-world prospective study, the authors used a national quality registry and found favorable OS in patients with NSCLC BMs undergoing SRS compared with results from previously published RCTs. The intracranial PFS was mainly driven by the emergence of new lesions rather than local progression. A greater number of lesions at baseline was associated with out-of-field progression, while intralesional hemorrhage at baseline was associated with local progression.

Short-term predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery outcome for untreated single non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a restrospective cohort study.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option for brain metastases (BM) not eligible for surgical resection, however, predictors of SRS outcomes are poorly known. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of SRS outcome in patients with BM secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The secondary objective is to analyze the value of volumetric criteria in identifying BM progression. This retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years of age with a single untreated BM secondary to NSCLC. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were assessed. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a BM volumetric increase 12 months after SRS. The unidimensional measurement of the BM at follow-up was also assessed. One hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a median BM volume at baseline of 1.1 cm3 (IQR 0.4-2.3). Fifty-two (38.5%) patients had SRS failure at follow-up. Only right BM laterality was associated with SRS failure (p=0.039). Using the volumetric definition of SRS failure, the unidimensional criteria demonstrated a sensibility of 60.78% (46.11%-74.16%), specificity of 89.02% (80.18%-94.86%), positive LR of 5.54 (2.88-10.66) and negative LR of 0.44 (0.31-0.63). SRS demonstrated a 61.5% local control rate 12 months after treatment. Among the potential predictors of treatment outcome analyzed, only the right BM laterality had a significant association with SRS failure. The volumetric criteria were able to identify more subtle signs of BM increase than the unidimensional criteria, which may allow earlier diagnosis of disease progression and use of appropriate therapies.

Prognosis versus Actual Outcomes in Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases: Reliability of Common Prognostic Parameters and Indices.

This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery as the sole treatment for brain metastases and to assess prognostic factors influencing survival. A total of 108 consecutive patients with 213 metastases were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment was determined with close-meshed MRI follow-up. Various prognostic factors were assessed, and several prognostic indices were compared regarding their reliability to estimate overall survival. Median overall survival was 15 months; one-year overall survival was 50.5%. Both one- and two-year local controls were 90.9%. The rate of new metastases after SRS was 49.1%. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that the presence of extracranial metastases, male sex, lower KPI, and progressive extracranial disease were significant risk factors for decreased survival. Of all evaluated prognostic indices, the Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BSBMs) showed the best correlation with overall survival. A substantial survival advantage was found for female patients after SRS when compared to male patients (18 versus 9 months, p = 0.003). SRS of brain metastasis is a safe and effective treatment option when frequent monitoring for new metastases with MRI is performed. Common prognostic scores lack reliable estimation of survival times. Female sex should be considered as an additional independent positive prognostic factor influencing survival.

Long-term radiographic and endocrinological outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent or residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used for the treatment of residual/recurrent nonfunctional pituitary adenoma (NFPA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors related to long-term tumor control and delayed endocrinopathies following SRS. This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with recurrent/residual NFPA treated with single-fraction SRS; they were then divided into two arms. The first arm included patients with at least 5 years of radiographic follow-up and all patients with local tumor progression. The second arm included patients with at least 5 years of endocrinological follow-up and all patients who developed endocrinopathy. Study endpoints were tumor control and new or worsening hypopituitarism after SRS and were analyzed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methodology. There were 360 patients in the tumor control arm (median age 52.7 [IQR 42.9-61] years, 193 [53.6%] males) and 351 patients in the hypopituitarism arm (median age 52.5 [IQR 43-61] years, 186 [53.0%] males). The median follow-up in the tumor control evaluation group was 7.95 (IQR 5.7-10.5) years. Tumor control rates at 5, 8, 10, and 15 years were 93% (95% CI 90%-95%), 87% (95% CI 83%-91%), 86% (95% CI 82%-90%), and 69% (95% CI 59%-81%), respectively. The median follow-up in the endocrinopathy evaluation group was 8 (IQR 5.9-10.7) years. Pituitary function preservation rates at 5, 8, 10, and 15 years were 83% (95% CI 80%-87%), 81% (95% CI 77%-85%), 78% (95% CI 74%-83%), and 71% (95% CI 63%-79%), respectively. A margin dose > 15 Gy (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9; p < 0.001) and a delay from last resection to SRS > 1 year (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-0.9; p = 0.04) were significant factors related to tumor control in multivariable analysis. A maximum dose to the pituitary stalk ≤ 10 Gy (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.09-1.2; p < 0.001) was associated with pituitary function preservation. New visual deficits after SRS occurred in 7 (1.94%) patients in the tumor control group and 8 (2.3%) patients in the endocrinopathy group. Other new cranial nerve deficits post-SRS occurred in 4 of 160 patients with data in the tumor control group and 3 of 140 patients with data in the endocrinopathy group. SRS affords favorable and durable tumor control for the vast majority of NFPAs. Post-SRS hypopituitarism occurs in a minority of patients, but this risk increases with time and warrants long-term follow-up.

Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia

BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for TN in terms of treatment efficacy and toxicity. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for idiopathic or classic TN between January 2013 and February 2022. Questionnaires regarding pain relief, treatment toxicity, and post-SRS treatment were sent between late 2022 and early 2023, and the responses received were analyzed. The Faces Pain Scale (FPS, 0: best, 5: worst) was used for quantitative evaluation. ResultsResponses were received from 51 patients (76%). The mean pre-SRS FPS score was 4.1 (standard deviation (SD) 1.1). Forty-three patients (83%) reported initial pain relief and the best post-SRS FPS score was 1.1 (SD 1.5) (p < .001). At a median follow-up of 50 months, the FPS score was still 1.1 (SD 1.6) (p < .001). Analysis of factors contributing to durable pain relief showed neurovascular compression to be associated with FPS score improvement (Odds ratio 5.7, 95% CI 1.1–29.7, p = 0.038). Facial dysesthesia had a mean pre-SRS FPS score of 1.7 (SD 2.0) and a mean score of 1.4 (SD 1.7) at the last follow-up (p = 0.32). Eight patients (15%) received post-SRS interventions and 21 (40%) no longer required pharmacotherapy without post-SRS intervention. Forty-four patients (85%) reported being satisfied with SRS. ConclusionsWe analyzed PROs of SRS for TN using the FPS and showed SRS to be a safe and effective treatment modality achieving long lasting pain relief.

Long-term outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial schwannoma in neurofibromatosis type 2: a genetic analysis perspective.

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is intractable because of multiple tumors involving the nervous system and is clinically diverse and genotype-dependent. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for NF2-associated schwannomas remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between radiosurgical outcomes and mutation types in NF2-associated schwannomas. This single-institute retrospective study included consecutive NF2 patients with intracranial schwannomas treated with SRS. The patients' types of germline mutations ("Truncating," "Large deletion," "Splice site," "Missense," and "Mosaic") and Halliday's genetic severity scores were examined, and the associations with progression-free rate (PFR) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The study enrolled 14 patients with NF2 with 22 associated intracranial schwannomas (median follow-up, 102 months). The PFRs in the entire cohort were 95% at 5 years and 90% at 10-20 years. The PFRs tended to be worse in patients with truncating mutation exons 2-13 than in those with other mutation types (91% at 5 years and 82% at 10-20 years vs. 100% at 10-20 years, P = 0.140). The OSs were 89% for patients aged 40 years and 74% for those aged 60 years in the entire cohort and significantly lower in genetic severity group 3 than in the other groups (100% vs. 50% for those aged 35 years; P = 0.016). SRS achieved excellent PFR for NF2-associated intracranial schwannomas in the mild (group 2A) and moderate (group 2B) groups. SRS necessitates careful consideration for the severe group (group 3), especially in cases with NF2 truncating mutation exons 2-13.

Effect of cerebral arteriovenous malformation location on outcomes of repeat, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: a matched-cohort analysis.

Patients with deep-seated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have a higher rate of unfavorable outcome and lower rate of nidus obliteration after primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the effect of AVM location on repeat SRS outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study involved 505 AVM patients managed with repeat, single-session SRS. The endpoints were nidus obliteration, hemorrhage in the latency period, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and favorable outcome. Patients were split on the basis of AVM location into the deep (brainstem, basal ganglia, thalamus, deep cerebellum, and corpus callosum) and superficial cohorts. The cohorts were matched 1:1 on the basis of the covariate balancing score for volume, eloquence of location, and prescription dose. After matching, 149 patients remained in each cohort. The 5-year cumulative probability rates for favorable outcome (probability difference -18%, 95% CI -30.9 to -5.8%, p = 0.004) and AVM obliteration (probability difference -18%, 95% CI -30.1% to -6.4%, p = 0.007) were significantly lower in the deep AVM cohort. No significant differences were observed in the 5-year cumulative probability rates for hemorrhage (probability difference 3%, 95% CI -2.4% to 8.5%, p = 0.28) or RICs (probability difference 1%, 95% CI -10.6% to 11.7%, p = 0.92). The median time to delayed cyst formation was longer with deep-seated AVMs (deep 62 months vs superficial 12 months, p = 0.047). AVMs located in deep regions had significantly lower favorable outcomes and obliteration rates compared with superficial lesions after repeat SRS. Although the rates of hemorrhage in the latency period and RICs in the two cohorts were comparable, delayed cyst formation occurred later in patients with deep-seated AVMs.

Predicting stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes with multi-observer qualitative appearance labelling versus MRI radiomics

Qualitative observer-based and quantitative radiomics-based analyses of T1w contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1w-CE MRI) have both been shown to predict the outcomes of brain metastasis (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Comparison of these methods and interpretation of radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models remains limited. To address this need, we collected a dataset of n = 123 BMs from 99 patients including 12 clinical features, 107 pre-treatment T1w-CE MRI radiomic features, and BM post-SRS progression scores. A previously published outcome model using SRS dose prescription and five-way BM qualitative appearance scoring was evaluated. We found high qualitative scoring interobserver variability across five observers that negatively impacted the model’s risk stratification. Radiomics-based ML models trained to replicate the qualitative scoring did so with high accuracy (bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.84–0.94), but risk stratification using these replicated qualitative scores remained poor. Radiomics-based ML models trained to directly predict post-SRS progression offered enhanced risk stratification (Kaplan–Meier rank-sum p = 0.0003) compared to using qualitative appearance. The qualitative appearance scoring enabled interpretation of the progression radiomics-based ML model, with necrotic BMs and a subset of heterogeneous BMs predicted as being at high-risk of post-SRS progression, in agreement with current radiobiological understanding. Our study’s results show that while radiomics-based SRS outcome models out-perform qualitative appearance analysis, qualitative appearance still provides critical insight into ML model operation.

Results of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of radioresistant brain metastases

Results of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of radioresistant brain metastases

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Results in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases in the Era of Modern Systemic Treatment Agents.

This study reports the results of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery treatment for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with modern systemic treatment methods (immunotherapy, targeted agents, and current chemotherapy agents). This study retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metasta- ses who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery in the Radiation Oncology Clinic of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between February 21, 2019, and August 15, 2022. The study's primary endpoint was accepted as the lesions' response sta- tus after stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery.The secondary endpoint was accepted as the patients' intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival. This study included 85 patients treated for 174 lesions. Their median follow-up was 6.6 (range: 1-42) months.Their median intracranial progression-free survival after radiotherapy was 5.3 (range: 1-33) months, and their median overall survival was 6.6 (range: 1-42) months. Concurrent immunotherapy was administered to 10 (11%) patients and targeted therapy to 8 (9%). Magnetic resonance imaging indicated that 14 (6%) patients had a complete response, 62 (35.6%) had a partial response, 10 (5.7%) had stable disease, and 23 (13.2%) had progressive disease. The complete response rate was significantly higher in patients receiving targeted therapy (P < .001; odds ratio = 0.0025, 95% CI = 0.006-0.109). Intracranial recurrence was observed in 28 (32.9%) patients after stereotactic radiosurgery/ fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery: 7 (8.2%) were inside the radiotherapy field, 13 (15.3%) were outside the radiotherapy field, and 8 (9.4%) overlapped the radiotherapy field. Intracranial progression-free survival was higher in patients receiving concomitant immu- notherapy (P = .028; hazard ratio = 0.107, 95% CI = 0.015-0.783). However, overall survival was higher in patients receiving targeted therapy (P = .035; hazard ratio = 0.217, 95% CI = 0.053-0.897). Using current systemic agents with radiotherapy for brain metastasis significantly affected post-radiotherapy intracranial progression-free survival.

Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis.

The frameless linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been evolving with a reduction in patient discomfort. However, there was limited evidence comparing frame-based and frameless SRS for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between frame-based and frameless LINAC SRS. This retrospective cohort compared the outcomes of frame-based LINAC SRS (1998-2009) with frameless LINAC SRS (2010-2020). The primary outcome was the obliteration rate. The other outcomes included the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes after SRS. A matched cohort was identified by propensity scores for further comparisons. A total of 65 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 13.2years (158.5months). There were 40 patients in the frame-based group and 25 patients in the frameless group. The overall obliteration rate was comparable (Frame-based 82.5% vs Frameless 80.0%, p=0.310) and not significantly different over time (log-rank p=0.536). The crude post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 1.5% and the incidence was 0.3 per 100 person-years. There were 67.7% of patients with AVM obliteration without new persistent neurological deficits at the last visit and 56.9% of patients with AVM obliteration without any deficits (transient or persistent) during the entire follow-up period. Four patients (8.0%) developed late onset persistent adverse radiation effects (more than 96months after SRS) among 50 patients with more than 8-year surveillance. In the propensity-matched cohort of 42 patients, there was no significant difference in AVM obliteration (Frame-based vs Frameless, log-rank p=0.984). Frameless and frame-based LINAC SRS have comparable efficacy in intracranial AVM obliteration. A longer follow-up duration may further characterize the rate of late adverse radiation effects in frameless SRS.

Stereotactic radiosurgery outcome for deep-seated cerebral arteriovenous malformations in the brainstem and thalamus/basal ganglia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Deep-seated unruptured AVMs located in the thalamus, basal ganglia, or brainstem have a higher risk of hemorrhage compared to superficial AVMs and surgical resection is more challenging. Our systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive summary of the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes for deep-seated AVMs. This study follows the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement. We conducted a systematic search in December 2022 for all reports of deep-seated arteriovenous malformations treated with SRS. Thirty-four studies (2508 patients) were included. The mean obliteration rate in brainstem AVM was 67% (95% CI: 0.60-0.73), with significant inter-study heterogeneity (tau2 = 0.0113, I2 = 67%, chi2 = 55.33, df = 16, p-value < 0.01). The mean obliteration rate in basal ganglia/thalamus AVM was 65% (95% CI: 0.58-0.72) with significant inter-study heterogeneity (tau2 = 0.0150, I2 = 78%, chi2 = 81.79, df = 15, p-value < 0.01). The presence of deep draining veins (p-value: 0.02) and marginal radiation dose (p-value: 0.04) were positively correlated with obliteration rate in brainstem AVMs. The mean incidence of hemorrhage after treatment was 7% for the brainstem and 9% for basal ganglia/thalamus AVMs (95% CI: 0.05-0.09 and 95% CI: 0.05-0.12, respectively). The meta-regression analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation (p-value < 0.001) between post-operative hemorrhagic events and several factors, including ruptured lesion, previous surgery, and Ponce C classification in basal ganglia/thalamus AVMs. The present study found that radiosurgery appears to be a safe and effective modality in treating brainstem, thalamus, and basal ganglia AVMs, as evidenced by satisfactory rates of lesion obliteration and post-surgical hemorrhage.

XRT-04. THE ROLE OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR MENINGIOMAS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Abstract Despite the generally benign and slow-growing nature, meningiomas in pediatric populations often exhibit more aggressive behavior. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive modality that is widely used as an upfront or adjuvant treatment for patients with meningiomas. Due to the rarity of meningiomas in pediatric patients, the outcomes of SRS for childhood meningiomas have never been described. From 1987 to 2022, a total of 2,030 patients with meningiomas underwent SRS at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Nine patients (2 female; incidence rate = 0.44%) with a median age of 14.5 years (range, 9—17 years) at SRS were identified. Three patients (33.3%) had a history of total body irradiation. Seven patients (77.8%) were asymptomatic at the time of SRS presentation. Seven patients (77.8%) had a pre-SRS craniotomy; two patients (22.2%) had pre-SRS fractionated radiotherapy. The median cumulative tumor volume was 3.65 cc (range, 0.01—11.84 cc). The median margin dose prescribed was 14 Gy (range, 11—25 Gy). The median follow-up time was 107 months (range, 24—194 months). Five patients (55.6%) experienced tumor progression at a median of 25 months (range, 13—161 months). Local tumor control at 1-, 5-, and 10 years was 100%, 55.56%, and 55.56%, respectively. After local tumor progression, 2 patients received repeat SRS, 2 patients had surgical resection and 1 was placed on hydroxyurea for an unresectable tumor. At the date of the last clinical follow-up, 5 patients (55.6%) were still alive while 4 patients (44.4%) expired due to the progression of intracranial disease. 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 100%, 88.89%, and 64.81%, respectively. Childhood meningioma is a rare tumor that exhibits aggressive behaviors. SRS should be considered as an upfront or adjuvant treatment option in the multi-modal management of childhood meningiomas for optimal tumor control and maximal quality of life preservation.

Risk Factors for Progression and Toxic Effects After Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Resected Brain Metastases

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been demonstrated as a feasible alternative to postoperative SRS for resectable brain metastases (BMs) with potential benefits in adverse radiation effects (AREs) and meningeal disease (MD). However, mature large-cohort multicenter data are lacking. To evaluate preoperative SRS outcomes and prognostic factors from a large international multicenter cohort (Preoperative Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases-PROPS-BM). This multicenter cohort study included patients with BMs from solid cancers, of which at least 1 lesion received preoperative SRS and a planned resection, from 8 institutions. Radiosurgery to synchronous intact BMs was allowed. Exclusion criteria included prior or planned whole-brain radiotherapy and no cranial imaging follow-up. Patients were treated between 2005 and 2021, with most treated between 2017 and 2021. Preoperative SRS to a median dose to 15 Gy in 1 fraction or 24 Gy in 3 fractions delivered at a median (IQR) of 2 (1-4) days before resection. The primary end points were cavity local recurrence (LR), MD, ARE, overall survival (OS), and multivariable analysis of prognostic factors associated with these outcomes. The study cohort included 404 patients (214 women [53%]; median [IQR] age, 60.6 [54.0-69.6] years) with 416 resected index lesions. The 2-year cavity LR rate was 13.7%. Systemic disease status, extent of resection, SRS fractionation, type of surgery (piecemeal vs en bloc), and primary tumor type were associated with cavity LR risk. The 2-year MD rate was 5.8%, with extent of resection, primary tumor type, and posterior fossa location being associated with MD risk. The 2-year any-grade ARE rate was 7.4%, with target margin expansion greater than 1 mm and melanoma primary being associated with ARE risk. Median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI, 14.1-21.3 months), with systemic disease status, extent of resection, and primary tumor type being the strongest prognostic factors associated with OS. In this cohort study, the rates of cavity LR, ARE, and MD after preoperative SRS were found to be notably low. Several tumor and treatment factors were identified that are associated with risk of cavity LR, ARE, MD, and OS after treatment with preoperative SRS. A phase 3 randomized clinical trial of preoperative vs postoperative SRS (NRG BN012) has began enrolling (NCT05438212).

Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative World Health Organization Grade I Skull Base Meningioma: Utility of Ki-67 Labeling Index as a Prognostic Indicator.

Gross total resection, without causing neurological deficits, is challenging in skull base meningioma (SBM). Therefore, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important approach for SBMs; however, it is difficult to predict the long-term prognosis. To identify the predictive factors for tumor progression after SRS for World Health Organization (WHO) grade I SBMs, focusing on the Ki-67 labeling index (LI). In this single-center retrospective study, factors affecting progression-free survival rates (PFSs) and neurological outcomes in patients undergoing SRS for postoperative SBMs were evaluated. Based on the Ki-67 LI, patients were classified into 3 groups: low (<4%), intermediate (4%-6%), and high LI (>6%). In the 112 patients enrolled, the cumulative 5- and 10-year PFSs were 93% and 83%, respectively. The PFSs were significantly higher in the low LI group (95% at 10 years) compared with the other groups (intermediate LI, 60% at 10 years, P = .007; high LI, 20% at 10 years, P = .001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that the Ki-67 LI was significantly associated with the PFSs (low vs intermediate LI; hazard ratio, 6.00; 95% CI, 1.41-25.54; P = .015; low vs high LI; hazard ratio, 31.90; 95% CI, 5.59-181.77; P = .001). Ki-67 LI may be a useful predictor of long-term prognosis in SRS for postoperative WHO grade I SBM. SRS provides excellent long- and mid-term PFSs in SBMs with Ki-67 LIs <4% or 4% to 6%, with a low risk of radiation-induced adverse events.

Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery in central nervous system lymphoma: A single institution experience.

e14061 Background: Primary or systemic high-grade B-cell lymphoma with secondary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL or SCNSL) are currently treated with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTx) based chemo-immunotherapy regimens with/without whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). CNS relapse can occur in up to 50% of patients with PCNSL or SCNSL. WBRT has been used as a salvage therapy for those patients. However, long-term neurological toxicities significantly reduce its clinical benefit. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the administration of a localized, high dose of ionizing radiation. Limited studies exist exploring SRS as a treatment modality in relapsed/refractory (r/r) PCNSL/SCNSL. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study evaluating the clinical efficacy of SRS in r/r PCNSL/SCNSL. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and treatment characteristics were collected in 29 r/r PCNSL (N=17)/SCNSL (N=12) patients, age ≥ 18 years, who received SRS between 01/2000 and 01/2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and reported using Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests. Results: Baseline characteristics are summarized (Table). The median Karnofsky performance status and Charlson comorbidity index were 70 and 5 respectively. For patients with PCNSL (N=17), the most common prior chemotherapy regimen administered was rituximab (R) in combination with the DeAngelis regimen (N=12), followed by the MATRIX regimen (N=3). In patients with SCNSL, the most common systemic chemotherapy regimen used was R + CHOP (N=9). Few patients received temozolomide (N=2). 5/29 (17%) of patients received WBRT before SRS. The overall response rate (ORR) to SRS in r/r PCNSL was 60% (7 CR and 2 PR). The ORR in r/r SCNSL was 83% (7 CR and 3 PR). The median OS of the overall cohort was 7.0 months (95% CI 5.1-8.9), while the median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI 1.2-8.7). For patients with PCNSL, the median OS was 10.0 months (95% CI 2.2-17.7), and only 7 months (95% CI 1.8-12.1) for patients with SCNSL. Prior WBRT was associated with worse survival outcomes. Of interest, WBRT was avoided in 24/24 patients (100%). Conclusions: Our data support that CNSL patients can benefit from SRS therapy, with acceptable OS and PFS. In addition, the disease control spared patients from WBRT and therefore, mitigated neurological complications associated with that modality. [Table: see text]

PD-0646 Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal cancer brain metastases

PD-0646 Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal cancer brain metastases