Outcomes Of Stenting Research Articles

Clinical characteristics and imaging patterns of cerebral infarction with outcomes of carotid artery stenting in symptomatic carotid stenosis: An eight-year journey

Objectives: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS) has emerged as an attractive option in recent times. CAS and topographical patterns of stroke in symptomatic stenosis have been inadequately addressed. With this objective, we conducted a study to analyze infarct patterns and complications of carotid stenting and determine outcome predictors after stenting. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective study from January 01, 2015, to December 31, 2022, on patients with SCS, who underwent carotid stenting with at least six months of follow-up was conducted. Infarct patterns, angiographic findings, procedural complications, and outcomes (favorable [modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2] or unfavorable [mRS >2]) were recorded. Chi-square, analysis of variance for qualitative and quantitative variables was employed. Significant variables on univariate analysis were entered into regression and outcome predictors were determined. Results: Ninety-six records were included in the study. Forty-six (47.91%), 12 (12.50%), and 38 (39.58%) patients had territorial infarcts (TIs), border-zone infarcts (BZIs), and mixed infarcts (MIs). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) <5 and transient ischemic attack (TIA) were significant (P < 0.05) while the circle of Willis anomalies were comparable in TI versus BZI versus MI. Bradycardia (54.16%) and vessel spasm (19.79%) were noted during stenting. Successful revascularization (residual stenosis <20%) was achieved in 97.87%. Procedural complications were comparable in TI versus BZI versus MI. Minor cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) with headache (9.57%), seizure (2.12%) peaking between 6 and 12 h, and severe with basal ganglia hemorrhage and death occurred. There were no major strokes. 64.13% and 75.28% achieved a favorable mRS at one and six months, respectively. NIHSS ≤10, early intervention (≤ 2 weeks), absence of diabetes, hypertension, or ischemic heart disease were significant (P < 0.05) for a favorable outcome. NIHSS ≤10, absence of hypertension at one month and NIHSS ≤10, absence of diabetes at six months were predictors of a favorable outcome. Conclusion: Severe carotid disease predisposed to CHS. Overall, CAS was a safe and effective procedure with 74.15% achieving favorable outcomes at six months.

Pulsatile Tinnitus: Differential Diagnosis and Approach to Management.

The purpose of this review is to provide an updated approach to the evaluation and management of pulsatile tinnitus (PT), an uncommon but often treatable subtype of tinnitus. Secondary PT can be due to either vascular or non-vascular etiologies, including, but not limited to: neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation or fistula, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, dural venous sinus stenosis, otoacoustic etiologies (e.g., otosclerosis, patulous eustachian tube) and bony defects (e.g., superior semicircular canal dehiscence). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging have comparable diagnostic yield, though each may be more sensitive to specific etiologies. If initial vascular imaging is negative and a vascular etiology is strongly suspected, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may further aid in the diagnosis. Many vascular etiologies of PT can be managed endovascularly, often leading to PT improvement or resolution. Notably, venous sinus stenting is an emerging therapy for PT secondary to idiopathic intracranial hypertension with venous sinus stenosis. Careful history and physical exam can help establish the differential diagnosis for PT and guide subsequent evaluation and management. Additional studies on the efficacy and long-term outcome of venous sinus stenting for venous stenosis are warranted.

TOKYO criteria 2024 for the assessment of clinical outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage.

The consensus-based TOKYO criteria were proposed as a standardized reporting system for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage. The primary objective was to address issues arising from the inconsistent reporting of stent outcomes across studies, which has complicated the comparability and interpretation of study results. However, the original TOKYO criteria were not readily applicable to recent modalities of endoscopic biliary drainage such as biliary drainage based on endoscopic ultrasound or device-assisted endoscopy. There are increasing opportunities for managing hilar biliary obstruction and benign biliary strictures through endoscopic drainage. Biliary ablation has been introduced to manage benign and malignant biliary strictures. In addition, the prolonged survival times of cancer patients have increased the importance of evaluating overall outcomes during the period requiring endoscopic biliary drainage rather than solely focusing on the patency of the initial stent. Recognizing these unmet needs, a committee has been established within the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society to revise the TOKYO criteria for current clinical practice. The revised criteria propose not only common reporting items for endoscopic biliary drainage overall, but also items specific to various conditions and interventions. The term "stent-demanding time" has been defined to encompass the entire duration of endoscopic biliary drainage, during which the overall stent-related outcomes are evaluated. The revised TOKYO criteria 2024 are expected to facilitate the design and reporting of clinical studies, providing a goal-oriented approach to the evaluation of endoscopic biliary drainage.

Clinical and safety outcomes of acute stenting plus thrombectomy for carotid tandem lesions with large ischemic core

BackgroundWe evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) among patients with anterior tandem lesion (TL) and large ischemic core (LIC).MethodsThis retrospective...

Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting Based on Aortic Arch Type and Degree of Atherosclerosis

Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting Based on Aortic Arch Type and Degree of Atherosclerosis

A Comparative Analysis of Bridging Stent Outcomes in Advanced EVAR

A Comparative Analysis of Bridging Stent Outcomes in Advanced EVAR

Association between hospital ownership and patient selection, management, and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting

BackgroundThis study analyses the association between hospital ownership and patient selection, treatment, and outcome of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS).MethodsThe analysis is based on the Bavarian subset of the nationwide German statutory quality assurance database. All patients receiving CEA or CAS for carotid artery stenosis between 2014 and 2018 were included. Hospitals were subdivided into four groups: university hospitals, public hospitals, hospitals owned by charitable organizations, and private hospitals. The primary outcome was any stroke or death until discharge from hospital. Research was funded by Germany’s Federal Joint Committee Innovation Fund (01VSF19016 ISAR-IQ).ResultsIn total, 22,446 patients were included. The majority of patients were treated in public hospitals (62%), followed by private hospitals (17%), university hospitals (16%), and hospitals under charitable ownership (6%). Two thirds of patients were male (68%), and the median age was 72 years. CAS was most often applied in university hospitals (25%) and most rarely used in private hospitals (9%). Compared to university hospitals, patients in private hospitals were more likely asymptomatic (65% vs. 49%). In asymptomatic patients, the risk of stroke or death was 1.3% in university hospitals, 1.5% in public hospitals, 1.0% in hospitals of charitable owners, and 1.2% in private hospitals. In symptomatic patients, these figures were 3.0%, 2.5%, 3.4%, and 1.2% respectively. Univariate analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between hospital groups. In the multivariable analysis, compared to university hospitals, the odds ratio of stroke or death in asymptomatic patients treated by CEA was significantly lower in charitable hospitals (OR 0.19 [95%-CI 0.07–0.56, p = 0.002]) and private hospitals (OR 0.47 [95%-CI 0.23–0.98, p = 0.043]). In symptomatic patients (elective treatment, CEA), patients treated in private or public hospitals showed a significantly lower odds ratio compared to university hospitals (0.36 [95%-CI 0.17–0.72, p = 0.004] and 0.65 [95%-CI 0.42-1.00, p = 0.048], respectively).ConclusionsHospital ownership was related to patient selection and treatment, but not generally to outcomes. The lower risk of stroke or death in the subgroup of electively treated patients in private hospitals might be due to the right timing, the choice of treatment modality or actually to better structural and process quality.

One-Year Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Patient-Level Pooled Analysis from Two Indian Registries

Introduction: This pooled analysis was conducted to assess the clinical safety and performance of the Supra family (Sahajanand Medical Technologies Ltd., Surat, India) of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from two real-world all-comers Indian registries at 1 year. Methods: We evaluated 1,824 patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with the Supra family of SES from two real-world Indian registries (891 patients from T-Flex registry and 933 patients from Tetriflex real-world registry). The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1-year follow-up. The safety endpoint was stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. Results: Among a total of 1,824 patients with ACS, 689 (37.8%) patients presented with STEMI. In ACS and STEMI groups, 47.6% and 41.8% patients had multivessel disease, respectively. Of 2,128 lesions in ACS group, 76.7% lesions were type B2/C and 16.2% lesions were totally occluded. In the STEMI group, out of 784 treated lesions, 76.7% were type B2/C lesions and 21.9% were totally occluded. At 1-year follow-up, incidence of TLF was 5.3% (cardiac death: 0.9%, TV-MI: 2.5%, TLR: 1.9%) in patients with ACS and 6.2% (cardiac death: 1.4%, TV-MI: 2.1%, TLR: 2.7%) in patients with STEMI. The 1-year rate of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 0.3% and 0.7% in patients with ACS and STEMI, respectively. Conclusion: This patient-level pooled analysis provides evidence for the safe and effective use of the Supra family of SES in complex patient populations such as ACS and even in STEMI with favorable rates of TLF and stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up.

One-Year Outcomes of Long Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents (≥40 MM) in Patients With Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease: Findings From a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India.

Background and objective Diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with extensive involvement of coronary arteries, necessitating the useof long (≥40 mm) drug-elutingstents (DES) based on the lesion length. However, these long DES can lead to complications such as in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis. This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and one-year clinical outcomes of using long DESin patients with diffuse CAD undergoing PCI at a tertiary care hospital in north India. Methodology Patients with diffuse CAD undergoingPCI with longDESbetween January 2017 and June 2022 were included in the study. Baseline characteristics were recorded, and patients were followed up telephonically or in the outpatient department (OPD) at one, three, six, and 12 months following the PCI. The primary endpointwas the target lesion failure (TLF) rate, with secondary endpoints constituting all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), subacute stent thrombosis, and ISR. Results A total of 200 patients were recruited and followed up for one year. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range: 48.25-63 years), and 82% were men. The most frequently stented artery was the left anterior descending (LAD, 48%), followed by the right coronary artery (RCA, 36%). A total of 388 stents (mean: 1.94 ±0.79) were implanted, including both long and short stents. The mean length and diameter of long stents were 43.64 ±3.58 mm and 3 ±0.37 mm, respectively. At the one-year follow-up, patients undergoing PCI with long DES ≥40 mm had an overall TLF rate of 5%, all-cause mortality of 6% (12 patients), MACE of 6% (12 patients), subacute stent thrombosis of 4% (eight patients), and ISR of 1% (two patients).A large proportion of patients (90%) had an uneventful follow-up of up to a year. At the one-year follow-up, all 10 (5%)patients with a primary outcomehad a smallerstent diameterthan those without a primary outcome (2.5 ±0.25 mm vs. 3.03 ±0.35 mm, p=0.015). Conclusions Our results suggest that using extremely long stents (>40 mm) for diffuse coronary lesions is safe, efficacious, and associated with relatively low event rates. In addition, the stent diameter has a substantial correlation with the primary outcome. Further studies with larger sample sizes as well as longer follow-up periods are required to validate our findings.

Ductal Stenting in Low-Resource Environments.

Duct-dependent pulmonary circulation has traditionally been addressed by the Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunts (BTTS). Recently, catheter-based alternatives such as ductal stenting have emerged as a particularly advantageous option, especially in resource-constrained settings. This article delves into the nuances of ductal stenting within low-resource environments, highlighting its relative ease of application, reduced morbidity, and cost-effectiveness as key factors in its favor. Comparisons in mortality between the two procedures are however likely to be confounded by selection biases. Ductal stenting appears to be particularly beneficial for palliating older infants and children with cyanotic congenital heart disease and diminished pulmonary blood flow who present late. Additionally, it serves as a valuable tool for left ventricular training in late-presenting transposition with an intact ventricular septum. A meticulous pre-procedure echocardiographic assessment of anatomy plays a pivotal role in planning access and hardware, with additional imaging seldom required for this purpose. The adaptation of adult coronary hardware has significantly enhanced the technical feasibility of ductal stenting. However, challenges such as low birth weight and sepsis specifically impact the performance of ductal stenting and patient recovery in low-resource environments. There is potential for systematic application of quality improvement processes to optimize immediate and long-term outcomes of ductal stenting. There is also a need to prospectively examine the application of ductal stenting in low-resource environments through multi-center registries.

Drug-Coated Balloons in the Management of Coronary Artery Disease.

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are specialized coronary devices comprised of a semicompliant balloon catheter with an engineered coating that allows the delivery of antiproliferative agents locally to the vessel wall during percutaneous coronary intervention. Although DCBs were initially developed more than a decade ago, their potential in coronary interventions has recently sparked renewed interest, especially in the United States. Originally designed to overcome the limitations of conventional balloon angioplasty and stenting, they aim to match or even improve upon the outcomes of drug-eluting stents without leaving a permanent implant. Presently, in-stent restenosis is the condition with the most robust evidence supporting the use of DCBs. DCBs provide improved long-term vessel patency compared with conventional balloon angioplasty and may be comparable to drug-eluting stents without the need for an additional stent layer, supporting their use as a first-line therapy for in-stent restenosis. Beyond the treatment of in-stent restenosis, DCBs provide an additional tool for de novo lesions for a strategy that avoids a permanent metal scaffold, which may be especially useful for the management of technically challenging anatomies such as small vessels and bifurcations. DCBs might also be advantageous for patients with high bleeding risk due to the decreased necessity for extended antiplatelet therapy, and in patients with diabetes and patients with diffuse disease to minimize long-stented segments. Further studies are crucial to confirm these broader applications for DCBs and to further validate safety and efficacy.

Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stents in comparison to Bare Metal Stents in Cancer Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Studies have demonstrated poor prognosis in cancer patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD). Cancer patients receiving PCI are at increased risk of in-stent thrombosis, bleeding, hospital readmissions, and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality when compared to patients without cancer. It is unclear if the poor outcomes in cancer patients are related to the stent type utilized for PCI. This meta-analysis attempts to identify differences in efficacy and safety outcomes when comparing drug-eluting stents (DESs) with bare metal stents (BMSs) in cancer patients. Methods. This meta-analysis is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcomes of interest were in-stent thrombosis, bleeding, and mortality. Results. Four studies comprising of 54,414 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no difference in in-stent thrombosis (odds ratio (OR): 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58–1.07), bleeding events (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.77–2.49), or in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 0.83–4.43) when comparing cancer patients who underwent PCI with DES vs BMS. Conclusions. This meta-analysis demonstrates no difference in mortality, bleeding, or in-stent thrombosis between revascularization with BMS vs DES in patients with cancer and CAD. Cancer patients included in this meta-analysis experienced higher rates of mortality, bleeding, and in-stent thrombosis after PCI compared to all-comers described in the literature.

Outcomes of endovascular intervention for atherosclerotic lesions confined to the popliteal artery

ObjectiveMost surgeons employ an endovascular-first approach to the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but controversy remains regarding the ideal interventions for the management of isolated popliteal artery disease (IPAD). Indeed, there are a paucity of data that compare outcomes of popliteal stents vs other peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of PVIs in IPAD. MethodsThe Vascular Study Group of New England database was queried for all IPAD PVIs performed for atherosclerotic occlusive disease from 2010 to 2021. Those with at least 1 year of follow-up data available were included for analysis. The primary endpoint was 1-year freedom from a composite target lesion (TL) treatment failure that included restenosis >50% on duplex, reintervention, or ipsilateral major amputation. ResultsWe included 689 procedures performed on 634 patients. Of these, 250 (36.3%) were treated with plain balloons (POBA), 215 (31.2%) had stents, 170 (24.7%) had special balloons (drug-coated, cutting, or lithotripsy), and 54 (7.8%) atherectomies were performed. Stent placement was associated with lower freedom from TL treatment failure (72.6%) than special balloon (81.2%; P = .048) and atherectomy (88.9%; P = .012), but not POBA (76.8%; P = .293). On multivariable logistic regression, stents (odds ratio, 0.637; P = .021) and preoperative P2Y12 inhibitor therapy (odds ratio, 0.683; P = .048) were both associated with lower freedom from intervention failure. ConclusionsPopliteal stent placement is associated with a higher rate of TL treatment failure at 1 year when compared with other PVIs including special balloon angioplasty and atherectomy, but not POBA, and should therefore be avoided in favor of special balloons or atherectomy whenever feasible.

Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Expandable Metallic Stents as a Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive and Symptomatic Primary Tumors of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Analysis.

Background: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) was introduced for the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) a few decades ago. However, its long-term outcomes remain controversial, especially for stage IV CRC. The aim of this study was to clarify the outcomes of SEMS as a "bridge to surgery" (BTS) for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in stage IV CRC by one-to-one propensity-score matching. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center from January 2007 to December 2017. Patients with obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors of stage IV CRC underwent primary resection (PR) or placement of a SEMS as a BTS. They were divided into SEMS and PR groups, and their short- and long-term outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 52 patients were reviewed (SEMS group, 21; PR group, 31). Sixteen patients in both groups were matched using propensity scores. Patients in the SEMS group more frequently underwent laparoscopic surgery than those in the PR group (75% versus 19%, P = .004). The two groups showed no significant differences in perioperative and pathological outcomes. The 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between groups (29% versus 20%, P = .53). Conclusions: As a BTS, the use of SEMS for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in CRC stage IV can be a comparable option to PR in terms of short- and long-term outcomes, and would be less invasive with respect to surgical procedures.

416 Redefining Treatment Expectations: Exploring Long-Term Outcomes of Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by various symptoms such as pulsatile tinnitus, chronic headaches, and papilledema. Venous sinus stenosis has been associated with IIH, and venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a potential treatment option. However, there is a lack of standardized outcome definitions and limited long-term data on the effectiveness of VSS in current literature. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed the long-term outcomes of 178 patients with medically-refractory IIH who underwent VSS by the senior author. Demographic information, pressure gradients, symptom improvement, recurrence, and persistence were recorded. Quality of life and symptom severity scores were assessed using standardized HIT-6, WHO-BREF, and pulsatile tinnitus surveys. Follow-up duration and patient-reported outcomes were also considered. RESULTS: Among the VSS cohort, 52.8% reported initial symptom relief followed by recurrence, and 13.5% experienced persistent symptoms without improvement. Overall failure rate of VSS was found to be 66.3%. Repeat procedures, such as lumbar puncture or additional stenting occurred in many patients. Survey data showed varying degrees of improvement in symptom severity and quality of life, and these changes were found to be statistically insignificant long-term. CONCLUSIONS: Our study challenges the prevailing notion of favorable outcomes in VSS suggests a need for reevaluation of the procedure as a long-term treatment option for severe IIH. High rates of symptom recurrence, persistence, and the need for repeat interventions indicate limitations in the efficacy of VSS. Improved understanding of the underlying factors contributing to poor outcomes and the development of alternative interventions are essential for better management of this debilitating condition.

Thirty-day outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Technological and surgical approaches to carotid artery stenting (CAS) have evolved. Modern randomised controlled trials comparing CAS and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are limited, and information about updated post-intervention outcomes are mostly from retrospective, small studies. This study aims to compare the 30-day outcomes of stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death with propensity-matched groups of CEA and CAS in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients over a recent study period of new CAS technologies and approaches. A retrospective, observational, multicentre analysis was conducted including consecutive symptomatic and asymptomatic patients treated with either primary CEA or CAS for internal carotid artery stenosis, between 2015 and 2022. Patients were propensity score-matched based on comorbidities and assessed according to symptom status. Primary endpoints include composite ipsilateral stroke, TIA, AMI and death within 30 days. Secondary endpoints include technical success and length of hospital stay. From a cohort of 1,110 patients, propensity matching produced 269 distinct treatment pairs (n=538). Most patients were asymptomatic (n=456, 85%). All 6 strokes were minor (CEA=2; CAS=4) and registered among asymptomatic patients. One AMI (CEA) and 1 patient death (CAS) were reported among symptomatic patients. Composite stroke/AMI/death were not significantly different between both types of symptom status and both revascularisation techniques (p=0.44 and p=1, respectively). Technical success was 100%. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in asymptomatic patients treated with CAS compared to those treated with CEA (p=0.05), but no difference was registered among symptomatic patients (p=0.32). Propensity-matched analysis suggests that CAS has similar postprocedural outcomes for stroke, AMI and death at 30 days compared to CEA.

Long-term outcome of percutaneous endovascular stenting in external iliac artery endofibrosis.

External iliac artery endofibrosis (EIAE) is a rare vascular disease which has been traditionally seen in avid cyclists. The conventional approach has been surgery, although no high-quality evidence suggests superiority of surgery over percutaneous endovascular intervention. There are limited data on the efficacy of stenting in EIAE. Over a 14-year period, we treated 10 patients (13 limbs) with EIAE with stents. These patients had declined surgery. The mean follow up was 8.4 ± 3.3 years. There were eight women. Five patients were competitive runners, three were cyclists, and two were triathletes. The mean age was 40.7 ± 2.9 years and body mass index was 19.46 ± 1.6. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used in eight limbs. Procedural success was achieved in all. The recurrence of symptoms occurred in three patients at a mean of 9.3 ± 2.1 months postindex intervention. The other seven patients remained symptom free. IVUS revealed a pathognomonic finding which we termed 'perfect circle appearance'. It results from symmetric or asymmetric hypertrophy of one or more layers of the arterial wall leading to negative remodeling, which creates a distinct echo dense structure contrasting itself from the luminal blood's echoluscent appearance. It is identical to IVUS images of diffuse venous stenosis with important implications in the treatment technique. We conclude that stenting in EIAE is safe and effective with a good long-term outcome. It can be an alternative to surgery, particularly in those patients who refuse a surgical approach. The IVUS image is pathognomonic and 'sine qua non' of EIAE.

Redefining treatment expectations: exploring mid- and long-term outcomes of venous sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

BackgroundVenous sinus stenting (VSS) is recognized as a safe and effective intervention for medically-refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). However, its long-term efficacy remains uncertain.MethodsThis retrospective review analyzed a single-center database...

Endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: focusing on comparison of endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy.

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a condition characterized by blockage or narrowing where the stomach empties its contents into the small intestine due to primary malignant tumors or metastatic diseases. This condition leads to various symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and weight loss. To manage malignant GOO, different treatment options have been employed, including surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ), gastroduodenal stenting (GDS) using self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ). This review focuses on comparing the clinical outcomes of endoscopic stenting (GDS and EUS-GJ) with SGJ for malignant GOO. Studies have shown that GDS with SEMS provides comparable clinical outcomes and safety for the palliation of obstructive symptoms. The choice between covered and uncovered SEMS remains controversial, as different studies have reported varying results. EUS-GJ, performed via endoscopic ultrasound guidance, has shown promising efficacy and safety in managing malignant GOO, but further studies are needed to establish it as the primary treatment option. Comparative analyses suggest that GDS has higher recurrence and reintervention rates compared to EUS-GJ and SGJ, with similar overall procedural complications. However, bleeding rates were lower with GDS than with SGJ. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine the optimal treatment approach for malignant GOO.

One-Year Outcomes of CGuard Double Mesh Stent in Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Prospective single and multicenter studies have shown improved outcomes of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting with the novel CGuard dual-layer mesh stent at 1 year. Objectives: The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies to assess 1-year efficacy and outcomes of CGuard in patients with carotid stenting. Methods: A systematic search was performed. All studies enrolling at least 20 patients were included in our analysis. The primary endpoints were death (all-cause, cardiovascular and ipsilateral stroke-related death) and stroke rate at 1 year. The secondary endpoint was in-stent restenosis at 1 year. Results: The final analysis included 1709 patients. The one-year all-cause mortality rate was 2.97% (39/1699, 95% CI: 1.26-6.86%, I2 = 67%, t2 = 0.3442, p < 0.01), cardiovascular-related death was 0.92% (10/1616, 95% CI: 0.35-2.39%, I2 = 34%, t2 = 0.2302, p = 0.18), and ipsilateral stroke-related death was 0.3% (1/1649, 95% CI: 0.1-0.87%, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0, p = 0.69). The one-year ipsilateral stroke rate was 1.21% (16/1649, 95% CI: 0.58-2.5%, I2 = 28%, t2 = 0.1433, p = 0.23), transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) rate was 1.78% (19/1149, 95% CI: 1.11-2.84%, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0, p = 0.69), and total composite 1-year stroke/TIA rate was 2.97% (32/1149, 95% CI: 1.84-4.77%, I2 = 0%, t2 = 0, p = 0.41). The in-stent restenosis rate at 1 year was 1.06% (13/1653, 95% CI: 0.48-2.34%, I2 = 28%, t2 = 0.2308, p = 0.22). Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that CAS with CGuard is safe with minimal neurological adverse events and in-stent restenosis rate at 1 year.