Outcomes Of Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Articles

Scapular coronal inclination in total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundImplant position is critical in the outcomes of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSA and ATSA). Studies to date focused on glenoid orientation but the literature on scapular position is lacking. This study aims to assess scapular coronal inclination (SCI) on erect shoulder X-rays compared with that on shoulder planning software. In addition, we compare SCI on erect shoulder X-rays before and after RTSA and ATSA. MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective review of erect X-rays of patients who had ATSA and RTSA performed by a single surgeon (J.T.) between January 2013 and May 2021. SCI was measured using the Scapular Coronal Axis (SCA) and the Scapular Spine Line–Medial Border (SSL-MB) relative to the horizontal axis. To achieve our primary aim, the SCA was measured on preoperative X-rays and compared to those in shoulder planning software. The difference in SSL-MB angles preoperatively and postoperatively was our secondary outcome. X-rays were screened to ensure acceptable rotation in the sagittal and axial planes, using coracoclavicular distance and coracoacromial angle, respectively, to enable reliable comparison. A repeat measurement was performed 1 month apart to determine intraobserver reliability. Three investigators performed measurements separately to determine interobserver reliability. ResultsThere were 177 total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) identified during the study period but only 24 ATSA and 29 RTSA fulfilled the selection criteria. The SCA had an inferior tilt of mean −16.3° (95% confidence interval [CI] −18.38 to −14.13) compared to horizontal (0°) in planning software. Using the SSL-MB, the mean difference for ATSA was 0.5° (95% CI −1.59° to 2.56°) and the mean difference for RTSA was −0.2° (95% CI −2.73° to 2.37°). The SSL-MB differences were not statistically significant. All interobserver and intraobserver Intraclass Correlation Coefficients measurements were ≥ 0.85 except 0.73 for intraobserver coracoclavicular distance. ConclusionIn conclusion, the native SCA was tilted inferiorly at a mean of −16.3° and not perfectly horizontal like portrayed in shoulder planning software. Surgeons need to be aware of this to accurately place the glenoid component in TSA. There was no change in SCI after TSA. Correlation with clinical outcomes is needed.

Functional outcomes of oncologic reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after tumor resection

BackgroundReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has progressively been utilized for reconstruction following wide resection of proximal humerus neoplasms. The purpose of the study is to evaluate complications, reoperation rates, range of motion (ROM), patient-reported outcomes, and postoperative radiographic data to better understand patient outcomes following oncologic associated RTSA. MethodsTwenty patients who underwent RTSA reconstruction for the treatment of an oncologic process from 2011 to 2019 were identified. Demographic, pathology, technical, categorical, and physical examination data were collected from the electronic medical record. The Henderson classification was used to categorize complications. Acromion to proximal humerus cut distance (resection length), stem tip to ulnohumeral joint distance, and working stem length were measured on most recent radiographs. Patients were contacted via phone to obtain the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and the Simple Shoulder Test score. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic data, tumor and disease characteristics, adjuvant treatment, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Radiographic data, ROM, and reoperation were further analyzed with Spearman rank correlation and Mann-Whitney U testing. ResultsThe overall complication rate was 35%, including 4/20 with dislocations (Henderson I), 3/20 with aseptic loosening (Henderson II), 1/20 with a periprosthetic fracture (Henderson III), 1/20 with a periprosthetic joint infection (Henderson IV), and 1/20 with a radial nerve injury. There were no cases of tumor progression (Henderson V). All patients with complications required reoperation. Measured radiographically, the mean distance from stem tip to ulnohumeral joint was 13.4 cm. A shorter stem tip to ulnohumeral joint distance was significantly associated with reoperation (10.0 ± 5.0 cm vs. 14.9 ± 5.0 cm, P = .04). At final follow-up, mean flexion and abduction were 90.4 degrees and 83.6 degrees, respectively. Of note, larger resections were negatively associated with flexion (Spearman R = −0.896, P = .003) and abduction (Spearman R = −0.761, P = .028) at final follow-up. Mean PROMs were Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score 12/30, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score 58/100, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score 26/100, and Simple Shoulder Test score 3/12. ConclusionsThis study corroborates previously published data on complication rates and ROM following oncologic RTSA, while PROMs were lower. Resection length and deltoid release correlate with functional outcomes and the risk of reoperation. The RTSA remains a viable treatment option for oncologic processes about the glenohumeral joint in appropriate patients.

Good clinical and radiological outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a novel convertible all polyethylene glenoid with hybrid fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up

BackgroundThe ideal glenoid implant for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is one that provides sound fixation and allows ease of conversion to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty should the clinical need arise. This study is the first to report a consecutive series of patients treated with a novel convertible all polyethylene glenoid with hybrid fixation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of aTSA, for treatment of primary glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis using the SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid. MethodsThis is a prospective study including consecutive patients from two centers in New Zealand and Sweden. Between August 29, 2017 and April 22, 2020, 103 patients received an aTSA for osteoarthritis with the SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid implant (LimaCorporate, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy). Ninety-seven patients had a minimum follow-up of 24 months and were therefore included in this study. There were 45 female and 52 male patients. The average age at the time of surgery was 68.2 years (range 49-81 years). Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations were performed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Oxford Shoulder Score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion measures were conducted using a goniometer. Standardized Grashey and axillary lateral radiographs were utilized to assess for evidence of glenoid and humeral component failure and loosening. ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 2.3 years (range 2.0-4.6 years). The mean preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 29.0 ± 12.4 and 90.3 ± 14.5, respectively (P < .001). The mean preoperative and postoperative Oxford Shoulder Scores were 21.0 ± 6.7 and 45.3 ± 4.4, respectively (P < .001). We found significant improvements in the range of motion, with mean forward flexion increasing from 87° to 155° and abduction 73° to 149°, respectively. Radiologically, there was no evidence of glenoid or humeral component failure or loosening. Six patients had evidence of reduced bone density around the humeral component. Two patients had repair of traumatic rupture of subscapularis tendon in the early postoperative period. None of the patients had revision of the glenoid or humeral components. ConclusionsPatients treated with an aTSA with the SMR TT Hybrid Glenoid, a novel glenoid implant that has the potential to simplify the process of revision, achieved promising clinical and radiologic results at a minimum of two years.

Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Aged Over 70 Without a Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the revision rates, complications, and outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) performed for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients aged over 70 years without a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. We performed a systematic literature search identifying comparative studies meeting the above patient criteria and published from January 2010 to May 2022 from 3 databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. We performed the systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and the study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. From the 1798 studies identified from the initial literature search, 4 met our inclusion criteria. Two thousand seven hundred thirty-one shoulder arthroplasties (1472 aTSA and 1259 rTSA) were evaluated with a minimum follow up of 2 years. A statistically significant lower revision rate was observed in rTSA compared to aTSA (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.84, p < .05). No significant difference was noted between aTSA and rTSA in overall complication rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.34, 2.86, p = .97) while aTSA displayed a statistically significant improved postoperative Constant-Murley score [aTSA: 80(75; 82), rTSA: 68(66; 76.5), p < .001]. Higher revision rates were identified following aTSA in our study population, although admittedly this is within retrospective studies. aTSA displayed equal functional results and postoperative complications compared to rTSA in patients over 70 without a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Given these similar results a shoulder surgeon must carefully consider each patient individually prior to deciding the optimal form of arthroplasty to offer.

Two cases of bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Bilateral shoulder joint disorders caused by rheumatoid arthritis significantly impair daily functioning owing to a lack of contralateral compensation. In Japan, reverse shoulder joint prostheses were approved in 2014. This was expected to improve the surgical outcomes of rheumatoid shoulder arthroplasty. We report two patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to evaluate their postoperative clinical outcomes and activities of daily living. The patients were women in their 70s with stage III class 2 rheumatoid arthritis. Their treatment and postoperative activities of daily living were retrospectively reviewed. The first patient underwent the inlay type and experienced a residual limitation of external rotation postoperatively; therefore, she was restricted to dress with front-open clothes. However, she was able to undress after the lining of the garment was changed to a slippery material. The second patient underwent the onlay type and showed almost no limitations in postoperative activities of daily living. She was able to undress with an external rotation of 40-50°. Bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty improved range of motion, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder score, and functional outcomes. Only a few difficulties were encountered in the activities of daily living.

Spontaneous Deltoid Tear in Cuff Tear Arthropathy and Its Effect on the Outcome of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Comparison Using Propensity Score Matching.

Deltoid function critically influences the results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), and spontaneous deltoid attrition tears are frequently detected in cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) patients; however, the clinical impacts of these tears on RTSA outcomes are undetermined. Our aim was to determine the effect of spontaneous deltoid attrition tears on postoperative outcomes after RTSA without an additional deltoid procedure. Seventy-two patients who underwent RTSA for CTA with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a minimum clinical follow-up of 1 year (mean, 32 months) were retrospectively reviewed in the study. Patients with a history of previous shoulder surgery or injury were excluded. The presence and location of deltoid attrition tears were determined in preoperative MRI. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to construct tear and no-tear groups. Finally, 21 patients, matched with respect to age, sex, hand dominance, symptom duration, medical comorbidity (obesity, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease), Hamada grade, and implant type, were assigned to each group. Clinical outcomes (functional scores, isometric power, and range of motion) in the two groups were compared. Deltoid attrition tears were detected in 21 of the 72 enrolled cases (29.1%). Anterolateral deltoid was the most frequent location and no tear was detected in the posterior deltoid. The tear rate increased with disease severity (Hamada G2, 4.8%; G3, 23.8%; > G4, 71.4%). No pre- or postoperative clinical variables differed significantly between the tear and no tear groups. Deltoid attrition tears were detected in 29% of CTA patients who underwent RTSA. The most common site was the anterolateral region and tear prevalence tended to increase with CTA progression. However, RTSA was found to provide satisfactory outcomes regardless of the presence of a deltoid attrition tear.

Clinico-radiological correlation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty outcomes

&lt;p&gt;Positioning of prosthetic components is essential for the success and longevity of the prosthesis. Judging prosthetic implantation radiologically is always beneficial; plain radiographs and computed tomography can provide information regards inclination and version of glenoid component, besides, lateralization of prosthetic components.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims at postoperative radiological evaluation of component positioning of reverse shoulder prosthesis and correlating measured radiological parameters with clinical outcome.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;Radiological assessment was carried on by radiographs taking advantage of true anteroposterior projection, and midaxial two-dimensional computed tomography cut. Radiographs evaluated glenoid inclination in coronal plane (superior-inferior tilt) via global inclination angle, and critical shoulder angle. Center of rotation was evaluated by calculating acromion index. Additionally, acromiohumeral interval, and deltoid lever arm distance were documented. Midaxial CT cuts evaluated glenoid version. Each parameter was correlated to postoperative clinical outcome represented in range of motion and total functional scores.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;the mean acromion index revealed significant change to 63.82±9.06%, total medialization surged significantly with average 1.51 cm with a mean postoperative calibrated center of rotation-distance of 3.72±0.78 cm. The mean increase in acro-mio-humeral interval was 1.57 cm with a new postoperative value of 2.49±0.9 cm. The mean glenoid version declined to 5.7º±5º, however, this change was not significant.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;In conclusion, accurate positioning of shoulder prosthesis components with proper tensioning of soft tissue envelope within acceptable measurement parameters is considered crucial for stability and longevity of implant with the best clinical outcomes.&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

Prior Acromioplasty Provides Similar Outcomes and Rate of Postoperative Complications Including Acromial Fracture After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis

To compare outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with prior arthroscopic acromioplasty versus a control group of patients with no history of acromioplasty. We performed a retrospective matched-cohort study of patients from a single institution who underwent RTSA with a history of acromioplasty from 2009 to 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. Patients' clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score and Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation surveys. Postoperative radiographs and patient charts were reviewed to determine whether patients sustained a postoperative acromial fracture. Charts were reviewed to determine range of motion and postoperative complications. Patients were matched on a 1:1 basis to a cohort of patients who underwent RTSA without a history of acromioplasty, and comparisons were performed using t and χ2 tests. Forty-five patients who underwent RTSA with a history of acromioplasty met the inclusion criteria and completed the outcome surveys. There were no significant differences between cases and controls in post-RTSA American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, Simple Shoulder Test, or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation outcome scores. There was no difference in the postoperative acromial fracture rate between cases and controls (P= .577). Overall, more complications occurred in the study group (n= 6, 13.3%) compared with the control group (n= 4, 8.9%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P= .737). After RTSA, patients who have undergone a prior acromioplasty have similar functional outcomes without a significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications compared with patients with no history of acromioplasty. Furthermore, previous acromioplasty does not increase the risk of acromial fracture after RTSA. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are being increasingly performed. In the event of a complication necessitating revision, RTSA is more commonly performed in both scenarios. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between patients undergoing revision RTSA for failed primary anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. We performed a retrospective review of a prospective single-institution shoulder arthroplasty database. All revision RTSAs performed between 2007 and 2019 with a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were initially included. After excluding patients with a preoperative diagnosis of infection, an oncologic indication, or incomplete outcomes assessment, we included 45 revision RTSAs performed for failed primary aTSA and 15 for failed primary RTSA. Demographics, surgical characteristics, active range of motion (external rotation [ER], internal rotation, forward elevation [FE], abduction), outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant Score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California, Los Angeles score), and the incidence of postoperative complications was compared between groups. Primary aTSA was most often indicated for degenerative joint disease (82%), whereas primary RTSA was more often indicated for rotator cuff arthropathy (60%). On bivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences in any range of motion or clinical outcome measure were found between revision RTSA performed for failed aTSA vs. RTSA. On multivariate linear regression analysis, revision RTSA performed for failed aTSA vs. RTSA was not found to significantly influence any outcome measure. Humeral loosening as an indication for revision surgery was associated with more favorable outcomes for all four range of motion measures and all five outcome scores assessed. In contrast, an indication for revision of peri-prosthetic fracture was associated with poorer outcomes for three of four range of motion measures (ER, FE, abduction) and four of five outcome scores (Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, University of California, Los Angeles). A preoperative diagnosis of fracture was associated with a poorer postoperative range of motion in ER, FE, and abduction, but was not found to significantly influence any outcome score. However, only two patients in our cohort had this indication. Complication and re-revision rates after revision RTSA for failed primary aTSA and RTSA were 27% and 9% vs. 20% and 14% (P=.487 and P=.515), respectively. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revision RTSA for failed primary shoulder arthroplasty did not significantly differ based on whether aTSA or RTSA was initially performed. However, larger studies are needed to definitively ascertain the influence of the primary construct on the outcomes of revision RTSA.

Anterosuperior approach versus deltopectoral approach for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical approach is an important factor that may affect the outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The most common approaches for RTSA are anterosuperior (AS) and deltopectoral (DP). However, controversy exists on which surgical approach is better. This meta-analysis aimed to compare both approaches in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes and complications. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that compared the postoperative outcomes of the AS and DP approaches for RTSA. After screening and quality assessment of the articles, we obtained two randomized controlled trials and four retrospective comparative studies. We analyzed the radiologic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications between the two approaches. The standardized mean difference and odds ratio were used to analyze the differences in outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The incidence rate of glenoid implant loosening was significantly (P = 0.04) lower in the AS group than that in the DP group. In terms of forward flexion after surgery, the DP approach produced significantly (P = 0.03) better outcomes compared with the AS approach. There were no significant differences in radiological outcomes or other complication rates between the two approaches. As a result of this meta-analysis, one of the two approaches did not bring a better result than the other. One has strength for better forward flexion and the other for a lower glenoid loosening rate. With this in mind, it is recommended to use the approach that the surgeon is most familiar with.

Effect of tuberosity repair on functional outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures

PurposeUnsatisfactory results of hemiarthroplasty in Neer's 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly, have led to the shift towards reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The objective of our study was to repair the tuberosities that are generally overlooked during RSA and observe its impact on the functional outcome and shoulder scores. MethodsWe include elderly patients with acutely displaced or dislocated 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures from July 2013 to November 2019 who were treated with RSA along with tuberosity repair by non-absorbable sutures and bone grafting harvested from the humeral head. Open injuries and cases with neuro-muscular involvement of the deltoid muscle were excluded. According to the tuberosity healing on radiographs of the shoulder at 9th postoperative month, the patients were divided into 2 groups, as the group with successful tuberosity repair and the other with failed tuberosity repair. Statistical analysis of the functional outcome and shoulder scores between the 2 groups were done by independent t-test for normally distributed parameters and Mann-Whitney test for the parameters, where data was not normally distributed. ResultsOf 41 patients, tuberosity healing was achieved in 28 (68.3%) and failed in 13 (31.7%) cases. Lysis of the tuberosity occurred in 5 patients, tuberosity displacement in 2, and nonunion in 2. Mean age was 70.4 years (range 65 – 79 years) and mean follow-up was 58.7 months (range 18 – 93 months). There were no major complications. Group with successful tuberosity repair showed improvement in mean active range of movements, like anterior elevation (165.1° ± 4.9° vs. 144.6° ± 9.4°, p < 0.000), lateral elevation (158.9° ± 7.2° vs. 138.4° ± 9.6°, p < 0.000), external rotation (30.5° ± 6.9° vs. 35.0° ± 6.3°, p = 0.367), internal rotation (33.7° ± 7.5° vs. 32.6° ± 6.9°, p = 0.671) and in mean shoulder scores including Constant score (70.7 ± 4.1 vs. 55.5 ± 5.7, p < 0.000), American shoulder and elbow surgeons score (90.3 ± 2.4 vs. 69.0 ± 5.7, p < 0.000), disability of arm shoulder and hand score (22.1 ± 2.3 vs. 37.6 ± 2.6, p < 0.000). ConclusionSuccessful repair and tuberosity healing around the RSA prosthesis is associated with statistically significant improvement in postoperative range of motion, strength and shoulder scores. Standardized repair technique and interposition of cancellous bone grafts, harvested from the humeral head can improve the rate of tuberosity healing.

Influence of humeral lengthening on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundDeltoid tensioning secondary to humeral lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly theorized to be crucial to improving range of motion (ROM) but may predispose patients to acromial/scapular spine fractures and neurologic injury. Clinical evidence linking patient outcomes to humeral lengthening is limited. This study assesses the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after RSA. MethodsA single institution review of 284 RSAs performed in 265 patients was performed. Humeral lengthening was defined as the difference in the subacromial height preoperatively to postoperatively as measured on Grashey radiographs. The subacromial height was measured as the vertical difference between the most inferolateral aspect of the acromion and the most superior aspect of the greater tuberosity. The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was assessed on a continuous basis. Secondarily, clinical outcomes were assessed using a dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening (≤25 vs. >25mm) based on prior clinical and biomechanical work purporting a correlation with clinical outcomes. Improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for ROM and outcome scores after RSA were also compared. ResultsHumeral lengthening demonstrated a nonlinear relationship with postoperative ROM, clinical outcome scores, and shoulder strength and their improvement preoperatively to postoperatively. Furthermore, there were minimal differences in ROM measures, outcome scores, and shoulder strength when stratified using the dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening. No difference in the proportion of patients exceeding the MCID or SCB when stratified by humeral lengthening ≤25 vs. >25mm was found. There was no difference in humeral lengthening in patients with versus without complications. ConclusionNo clear relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was identified. The previously purported 25mm threshold for humeral lengthening did not predict improved patient outcomes. Outcomes after RSA are multifactorial; the relationship between humeral lengthening and outcomes is likely confounded by other patient and surgical factors. Level of EvidenceIV; Case Series.

Safety and short-term outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in an ambulatory surgery center.

A scarcity of literature exists comparing outcomes of outpatient anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). This study was performed to compare early outcomes between the 2 procedures in a freestanding ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and to determine if the addition of preoperative interscalene nerve block (ISNB) with periarticular liposomal bupivacaine injection (PAI) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) would improve outcomes over PAI alone. Medical charts of all patients undergoing outpatient primary aTSA or rTSA at 2 ASCs from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed. Atotal of 198 patients were ultimately identified (117 aTSA and 81 rTSA) to make up this retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, PACU outcomes, complications, readmissions, reoperations, calls to the office, and unplanned clinic visit rates were compared between procedures. PACU outcomes were compared between those receiving ISNB with PAI and those receiving PAI alone. Patients undergoing rTSA were older (61.1 vs. 55.7 years, P<.001) and more likely to have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 (51.9% vs. 41.0%, P=.050) compared to patients having aTSA. No patient required an overnight stay. Time in the PACU before discharge (89.1 vs. 95.6 minutes, P=.231) and pain scores at discharge (3.0 vs. 3.0, P=.815) were similar for aTSA and rTSA, respectively. One intraoperative complication occurred in the aTSA group (posterior humeral circumflex artery injury) and 1 in the rTSA group (calcar fracture) (P=.793). Ninety-day postoperative total complication (7.7% vs. 7.4%), shoulder-related complication (6.0% vs. 6.2%), medical-related complication (1.7% vs. 1.2%), admission (0.8% vs. 2.5%), reoperation (2.6% vs. 1.2%), and unplanned clinic visit (6.0% vs. 6.1%) rates were similar between aTSA and rTSA, respectively (P≥.361 for all comparisons). At 1 year, there were 8 reoperations and 15 complications in the aTSA group compared with 1 reoperation and 8 complications in the rTSA group (P=.091 and P=.818, respectively). Patients who had ISNB spent less time in PACU (75 vs. 97 minutes, P<.001), had less pain at discharge (0.2 vs. 3.9, P<.001), and consumed less oral morphine equivalents in the PACU (1.2 vs. 16.6 mg, P<.001). Early postoperative outcomes and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups, and all patients were successfully discharged home the day of surgery. The addition of preoperative ISNB led to more efficient discharge from the ASC with less pain in the PACU.

Best practice in shoulder arthroplasty-a reflective personal review

IntroductionShoulder arthroplasty is uncommon but increasing in number when compared to hip and knee arthroplasty. The average UK shoulder surgeon performs less than 10 a year and revision surgery is even more rare. The surgeon should be familiar with surgical approaches, implant designs and preferably be fellowship trained to produce good outcomes. MethodsNarrative review was undertaken and senior author's personal practice was discussed. ResultsThe need for a clear understanding of indications and contraindications for both anatomic shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, good preoperative planning, protocol-based peri-operative management and good rehabilitation protocol in the post operative period cannot be overemphasized. ConclusionWe are still learning best practice and prosthesis designs have changed over the past years with extensive choices especially in Reverse arthroplasty. Each of these designs has unique biomechanical properties and require a deep understanding of indications. Good surgical training and the use of multi-disciplinary team meetings for complex cases should improve the safety and quality of surgery for patients and ultimately long-term outcome of shoulder arthroplasty.

Mid- to long-term clinical outcomes after press-fit short stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty

To date, a limited number of studies report mid- to long-term outcomes of press-fit short stem shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to report and analyze mid- to long-term outcomes in a series of patients that received press-fit short stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The hypothesis was that press-fit short stem RSA would be a safe and effective treatment with satisfactory mid- to long-term outcomes. The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 60 patients that received RSA using press-fit uncemented short humeral stems by two surgeons between March 2014 and December 2015. The absolute Constant Score (CS), age-/sex-adjusted CS, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimum follow-up of 6 years. The proportions of patients that achieved a satisfactory outcome after RSA were based on the substantial clinical benefit, as proposed for the absolute CS (net improvement ≥19.1). Of the initial cohort of 60 patients, 9 (15%) died of causes unrelated to RSA, 5 (8%) were revised with partial implant removal, and 4 (7%) were lost to follow-up. This left a final cohort of 42 patients (70%) with complete postoperative CS (absolute and age-/sex-adjusted) and ASES scores at a mean follow-up of 6.7±0.5 years (range, 6.1-7.8). Of the final cohort, 11 (18%) had complications, of which 9 (15%) were treated conservatively, and 2 (3%) required reoperations without implant removal. Net improvements in functional outcomes were 34.7±21.2 for the absolute CS, 54%±32% for the age-/sex-adjusted CS, and postoperative ASES scores were 87.9±13.7. Of the 29 patients who had complete records for absolute CS, 22 (76%) received a substantial clinical benefit (net improvement ≥19.1). Mean net improvements of absolute CS exceeded the substantial clinical benefit after press-fit short stem RSA at a follow-up of 6.1 to 8.6 years. While 5 patients (8%) experienced postoperative instability, none had fracture sequelae, which indicates that offset or angular adjustments may be required even in patients with normal bony anatomy. Press-fit short stem RSA is a safe and effective treatment with satisfactory mid- to long-term outcomes, with no stem revisions for aseptic reasons, which compares favorably to the literature that reports high rates of osteolysis and subsequent stem loosening.

Impact of prior anterior instability on shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review

Anterior shoulder instability (ASI) is a frequently encountered pathology. Patients with a history of ASI have an increased rate of developing glenohumeral osteoarthritis and becoming candidates for shoulder arthroplasty. This systematic review aims to synthesize outcomes for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with a history of ASI. A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating the impact of prior ASI on total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse TSA, and/or hemiarthroplasty outcomes, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Studies were graded by level of evidence and data concerning patient demographics and outcomes were extracted. Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria, including 596 patients (413 male, 181 female). The average age of the control and prior ASI groups were 57.5 and 57.0 years, respectively. Overall, 251 patients were treated operatively, 132 nonoperatively, and 213 were controls without a history of prior ASI. Shoulder arthroplasty techniques included TSA (436 shoulders), reverse TSA (130 shoulders), and hemiarthroplasty (14 shoulders). Prior anterior stabilization management included soft tissue repair, bony augmentation, and nonoperative treatment. Almost all studies reported no significant difference in subjective and functional arthroplasty outcomes between control and prior ASI groups, or between patients with prior ASI treated nonoperatively vs. surgically. Shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of prior ASI results in improved subjective and functional outcome scores that are comparable to patients without a history of instability.

Clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair in patients with massive rotator cuff tears without osteoarthritis: comparison using propensity score matching.

The optimal management for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) without osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) vs. rotator cuff repair (RCR) in patients with MRCTs without OA. We conducted a retrospective data analysis of 68 patients treated for MRCTs via RSA and 215 patients treated for MRCTs via arthroscopic RCR between January 2014 and April 2019. Through propensity score matching, patients were matched for sex, age, tear size, and global fatty degeneration index. Thirty-nine patients in each group were included, and all patients had completed minimal 2-year follow-up. Postoperative radiologic evaluations of healing failure were performed. The visual analog scale score for pain, range of motion, and functional outcome measures including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) score, Simple Shoulder Test score, and Constant score were assessed and compared between the 2 groups. Healing failure was observed in 10 patients in the RCR group (32.3%). No statistically significant differences in preoperative range of motion and functional scores were found between the RCR and RSA groups. Both groups showed significant pain relief and functional improvement at final follow-up. Patients in the RCR group showed significantly greater forward elevation (156.4°±23.8° vs. 139.7°±22.4°, P<.001) and internal rotation (thoracic vertebra, T8.2±1.2 vs. T9.7±2.6, P=.001). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 88.3±12.2 in the RCR group and 81.8±16.1 in the RSA group (P=.045). The QuickDASH score was significantly higher in the RCR group (P=.019). A significantly higher Simple Shoulder Test score (9.7±2.8 vs. 8.1±3.0, P=.01) and a significantly higher Constant score (67.2±6.5 vs. 63.2±7.1, P=.011) were seen in the RCR group. Both RSA and RCR are effective and reliable treatment options for MRCTs without OA. However, the RCR group showed better shoulder function improvement than the RSA group. Considering the possible implications of RSA, RCR should be referred to as a first-line treatment option for patients with MRCTs without OA with proper indications.

Comparison of Reverse and Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With an Intact Rotator Cuff and No Previous Surgery.

This study's purpose is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and an intact rotator cuff with no previous history of shoulder surgery using a single platform TSA system at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A total of 370 aTSA patients and 370 rTSA patients matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up from an international multi-institutional Western Institutional Review Board approved registry with a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed for this study. All patients had a diagnosis of OA, an intact rotator cuff, and no previous shoulder surgery. All patients were evaluated and scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using six outcome scoring metrics and four active range of motion measurements. Mean follow-up was 41 months, and the mean age was 73 years. Preoperatively, the rTSA patients had lower outcome metrics and less motion. Postoperatively, aTSA and rTSA patients had similar clinical outcomes, motion, and function, with the only exception being greater external rotation in aTSA exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. Pain relief was excellent, and patient satisfaction was high in both groups. Humeral radiolucent lines were similar in both groups (8%). Complications were significantly higher with aTSA (aTSA = 4.9%; rTSA = 2.2%; P = 0.045), but revisions were similar (aTSA = 3.2%; rTSA = 1.4%; P = 0.086). At a mean of 41 month follow-up, primary aTSA and rTSA patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff with no previous history of shoulder surgery had similar clinical and radiographic outcomes. Greater external rotation was noted in aTSA patients at follow-up. However, aTSA patients had a significantly greater rate of complications compared with rTSA patients. rTSA is a viable treatment option in patients with an intact rotator cuff and no previous shoulder surgery, offering similar clinical outcomes with a lower complication rate. Level III.

Does reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composite (APC) have surgical benefits over hemiarthroplasty with APC in patients with tumors of the proximal humerus?

The research on surgical outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using allograft-prosthesis composites for the proximal humeral oncologic condition is still scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of shoulder joint reconstruction with hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using allograft-prosthesis composites for tumors of the proximal humerus. Eleven patients underwent hemiarthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using allograft-prosthesis composites for tumors of the proximal humerus between July 2011 and April 2018 were reviewed. Radiographic analysis for bone union of allograft-host bone junction, implant loosening, stress shielding and shoulder dislocation or subluxation was performed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scales for pain, range of motion, Simple Shoulder Test score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Furthermore, oncologic outcome and complications were also assessed, respectively. There were five patients with hemiarthroplasty (mean age, 23.2years) and six patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (mean age, 46.8years, P=0.05). Radiographically, there were no events associated with implant loosening, stress shielding and shoulder dislocation or subluxation in the two groups. There were no differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. There was no local recurrence in entire cohort. In the hemiarthroplasty group, one patient was required revision surgery to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at postoperative 6years due to rotator cuff dysfunction. In the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty group, one patient showed the fracture occurred at allograft-host bone junction at postoperative 6months. Surgical outcomes of hemiarthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composites were not inferior to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty when applied in properly selected patients. The authors recommended that hemiarthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composites could be used for young age patients without glenoid metastasis involvement, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composites could be used for patients with old age or metastatic bone tumors.

Clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty for post-instability arthropathy after open anterior bone block stabilization

BackgroundPost-instability glenohumeral arthropathy can occur after nonanatomic instability repairs. With advanced secondary arthritis, subsequent shoulder arthroplasty may be complicated by altered surgical anatomy, poor range of motion, subscapularis deficiency, unique glenoid wear patterns, and/or aberrant neurovascular anatomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty after previous open nonanatomic anterior shoulder stabilization, particularly glenoid bone block procedures. MethodsBetween 2008 and 2014, all patients with shoulder arthroplasty for symptomatic post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy after prior open stabilizations were identified from surgical case logs of two senior shoulder surgeons. Demographic variables were extracted from electronic medical records, operative reports, and preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and a minimum 24-month follow-up with completion of patient-reported questionnaires was required. Postoperative active forward elevation and active external rotation were recorded. The primary outcome measures were the visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score, and the Simple Shoulder Test. Perioperative complications and rates of secondary reoperation were extracted. ResultsA total of 12 patients were identified with an average age of 63 ± 12 years (range, 46-83), including 7 males and 5 females, and index surgery included open Bristow (n = 7), open Latarjet (n = 2), iliac crest bone graft (n = 1), and Putti-Platt procedure (n = 2). Seven patients underwent anatomic TSA, 4 reverse TSA, and 1 hemiarthroplasty. At an average of 44 ± 21 months follow-up, average active forward elevation and active external rotation improved from 100 ± 36 preoperatively to 132 ± 41 (P = .12) postoperatively and 19 ± 15 to 49 ± 11 (P < .01), respectively. The average visual analog scale decreased from 5 ± 3 to 1 ± 2 (P < .01) and mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons improved from 44 ± 23 to 79 ± 17 (P < .01); and the average Simple Shoulder Test improved from 4 ± 2 to 9 ± 3 (P < .01). No perioperative complications or secondary reoperations were required, and only one patient experienced subsequent instability due to subsequent shoulder trauma. ConclusionDespite the surgical complexity and unique challenges associated with post-instability arthropathy, shoulder arthroplasty after prior open anterior bone block procedure or nonanatomic reconstruction is a safe procedure with low risk of perioperative complication, subsequent shoulder instability, or secondary revision surgery. All patients experienced significant improvements in pain, range of motion, and self-reported function at short- to mid-term follow-up.