Outcomes Of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Articles

Does having prior rotator cuff repair affect outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A matched cohort study

BackgroundThis study compares outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with prior rotator cuff repair to matched control patients without prior surgery. Patients and methodsAll primary RTSAs with prior surgery were retrospectively identified from a prospective research database between 2000 and 2014. RTSA patients with prior open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and minimum 2-year follow-up, with age- and sex-matched controls, were identified. Active range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes were evaluated. Preoperative, postoperative, and improvement in outcomes were compared between groups. ResultsOne hundred fifty RTSA patients were included, with 75 patients in each group (42 female, 33 male). Mean age of the RTSA group with prior rotator cuff repair was 69.6years (average follow-up: 3.8years) compared to the RTSA group without prior surgery (control) aged 70.0years (average follow-up: 3.3years). Preoperatively and postoperatively, RTSA patients with prior cuff repair had slightly worse overhead ROM and outcome scores compared to controls but none were statistically different. The RTSA and control groups had similar and significant improvements in all postoperative ROM and outcome scores. Complications were similar between groups. DiscussionRTSA patients with prior rotator cuff repair had similar ROM, functional outcome scores, and complications compared to a matched control group without prior surgery. Level of evidenceIII, treatment study.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using the Alternate Scapular Line Baseplate Orientation for Glenoid Bone Loss

Glenoid sided bone loss poses a challenge when performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Achieving stable baseplate fixation is paramount in cases where glenoid bone is deficient. Placing the baseplate in an anteverted position along the alternate scapular line, in order to engage the dense pillar of bone where the scapular spine meets the scapular body, is an option when dealing with glenoid erosion or cavitary defects. Although this allows for stable initial baseplate fixation, questions remain about the effects of placing the baseplate in a more anteverted position relative to the standard glenoid center line. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using an alternate scapular line baseplate orientation in the setting of glenoid bone loss with a minimum of five years of follow up.

Midterm clinical and radiologic results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an eccentric glenosphere

An eccentric glenosphere (EG) has been proposed as a way of preventing scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Our aim was to report the midterm clinical and radiographic results of EG after RSA. A number of the patients described here were included in a previous study with short-term follow-up. The current retrospective study gave us the opportunity to follow many of these patients for a longer period of time. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. Statistical significance was set at P < .001. Forty-nine RSAs with an EG and at least 60 months of follow-up were included. Range of motion (ROM), Constant scores (CSs), and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) were assessed. Scapular notching was graded according to the Sirveaux classification. At the last follow-up, the mean improvement in active elevation (ROM) was 46° and the mean CS increased by nearly 31 points (both groups P < .001). The final SSV was 70%. Twenty-one patients (43%) had scapular notching, but in two-thirds of patients it was low-grade. The use of an EG provided excellent clinical outcomes that persisted with midterm follow-up. The rate of notching was lower than in other studies with EGs, but further studies are required to confirm this. An EG was safe and there were no issues with baseplate loosening or failure.

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a short stem through a superolateral approach

Reverse shoulder arthroplasties have progressed in recent decades to become the most popular type of arthroplasty. Short stems with metaphyseal fixation have been developed to preserve bone stock and facilitate possible revision. Accurate positioning of these implants can be challenging using the superolateral approach. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of reverse short-stem arthroplasties using a superolateral approach with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Between January 2015 and December 2016, a total of 76 patients underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgery (79 shoulders) using a short uncemented humeral stem for shoulder arthritis with irreparable rotator cuff tear. Arthroplasties for post-traumatic osteoarthritis were excluded. Functional outcomes were assessed using Constant Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), visual analog scale (VAS), and range of motion. Radiographic analysis was used to evaluate component loosening, implant position, and implant filling ratio. The mean age was 70.8 years. At a mean of 38.8-monthfollow-up, there were significant improvements in Constant score (44.2 to 87.9, P < .001), ASES score (36.2 to 84.3, P < .001), and VAS score (6.8 to 0.4, P < .001). Forward flexion improved from 89°to 131°(P < .001), and external rotation improved from 25° to 36°(P < .001). No evidence of periprosthetic loosening was visible. Mean varus of the humeral stem was 1°(±6°). The mean glenoidal inclination was 98°(±7°), which corresponds to a lower tilt of 8°. The average filling ratio was between 50% and 60% in both the metaphysis and the diaphysis. The clinical results obtained in this study were satisfying, with a significantly low complication rate. Hence, short-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a superolateral approach, while taking particular care to protect the deltoid, remains our method of choice.

Should the supraspinatus tendon be excised in the case of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture?

In the case of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) with tuberosity reconstruction, it is unclear whether the supraspinatus tendon continues to play a role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA for PHFs in a large cohort of elderly patients and compare the results in the case of supraspinatus excision or preservation. In this retrospective multicentre study, 150 patients (mean age 77years, 93% female) were reviewed and radiographed with a minimum follow-up of 24months. The same Grammont prosthetic design was used in all cases (inclination angle 155°, non-lateralised glenosphere). Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 117) underwent supraspinatus excision and Group B supraspinatus preservation (n = 33). Complications were recorded, and shoulder function, active mobility and subjective results were assessed. At a mean follow-up of 59months, there was no statistical difference in the complication rate (6% vs. 6.8%, p = 1), mean Constant score (61 points vs. 59 points, p = 0.52), simple shoulder value (74% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.9), active anterior elevation (125° vs. 128°, p = 0.45) and internal rotation (4.9 points vs. 4.1 points, p = 0.2). However, mean active external rotation was better in Group A (22° vs. 13°, p = 0.01). The greater tuberosity healing rate in satisfactory position did not differ statistically between the groups (68% vs. 55%, p = 0.14). In the case of RSA with tuberosity reconstruction for acute PHFs, there is no clear evidence that supraspinatus preservation is advantageous.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of 17 reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases performed after failed humeral head resurfacing

IntroductionDespite the good outcomes with shoulder resurfacing procedures reported by some authors, our team has documented several failures caused by glenoid erosion and rotator cuff rupture, likely due to implant overstuffing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) performed after failed humeral head resurfacing (HHR). Material and methodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study of 17 patients who underwent RSA after failed HHR between January 2011 and February 2016. The mean patient age was 69.4 years and the mean time between HHR and surgical revision was 41 months (14.7–73.5±18.8). Preoperative ultrasonography and CT were used to evaluate the condition of the rotator cuff, extent of glenoid erosion and to look for signs of humeral cup loosening. The clinical outcomes were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the simple shoulder test (SST), DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and the Constant-Murley score. Pain was estimated using a visual analog scale (VAS). The range of motion (ROM) was determined pre- and postoperatively. All patients had standard AP and lateral X-ray views of the shoulder taken as part of their postoperative follow-up protocol to look for implant loosening. ResultsThe mean follow-up was 35.9 months (24–59±10.7). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All the functional scores were improved after RSA. The median weighted Constant score preoperatively was 46% (36; 62) while it was 92% postoperatively (78; 100) (p<0.0001). The active ROM improved by 65° in forward flexion (p=0.0003) and by 30° in external rotation (p=0.002). On X-rays, we identified one patient with Sirveaux stage 4 glenoid notching and one patient with a humeral periprosthetic radiolucent line less than 2mm thick in zone 6, with no clinical consequences. ConclusionThe excellent outcomes after RSA for failed HHR in our study are similar to the ones reported when RSA is performed for cuff tear arthropathy.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for recent proximal humerus fractures: Outcomes in 422 cases

The ageing of the population is steadily increasing the frequency of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in elderly patients. The last decade has seen a shift from hemi-arthroplasty (HA) to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in these patients. The primary objective of this study was to assess short- and long-term outcomes of RSA in a large cohort of elderly patients with recent PHFs. The secondary objectives were to evaluate radiological outcomes and short- and long-term morbidity and mortality rates. Outcomes of RSA to treat PHFs in older patients are satisfactory, reliable, and sustained over time. This retrospective multi-centre study included 898 patients with a mean age of 79 years, among whom 422 underwent a standardised clinical and radiological evaluation at least 1 year after RSA. Some patients were re-evaluated twice. An evaluation within the first 5 years was available for 420 patients (≤5-Y group), whereas 119 patients were re-evaluated more than 5 years after RSA (>5-Y group). Some patients had one re-evaluation either within or after 5 years and others had both an early and a late re-evaluation; thus the total number of re-evaluation was greater than the number of patients. Mean active forward elevation was 115°±29°, mean external rotation with the elbow by the side was 17°±19°, mean internal rotation (hand-to-back) was 4.3±2.5 points, mean absolute Constant score was 57±15, and mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 70%±18%. Re-implantation of the tuberosities followed by healing in the anatomical position was associated with significantly better outcomes, notably regarding rotations. Even in the absence of healing in the anatomical position, tuberosity repair was associated with better clinical outcomes compared to tuberosity excision. Humeral loosening occurred in 3.5% of patients and was associated with tuberosity excision. Glenoid loosening was seen in 3.5% of patients and was associated with superior tilt of the glenoid component. The main complication was prosthesis instability, which occurred in 2.5% of patients, a proportion similar to that seen in the general population. Post-operative patient survival was not significantly different from that in the general population of the same age. Prosthesis survival was 91% after 20 years. Clinical outcomes of RSA for PHF in elderly patients were not only satisfactory but also reproducible and sustained over time. Tuberosity re-implantation around the prosthesis is the key step for optimising the functional outcomes, notably by restoring rotations and decreasing the risk of complications (prosthesis instability and humeral loosening). IV, retrospective observational study.

Is there a relationship between preoperative diagnosis and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? An experience in 699 shoulders

The influence of diagnosis on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not completely understood. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of different pathologies. A total of 699 RSAs were performed for the following diagnoses: (1) rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCA), (2) massive cuff tear (MCT) with osteoarthritis (OA), (3) MCT without OA, (4) OA, (5) acute proximal humeral fracture, (6) malunion, (7) nonunion, and (8) inflammatory arthropathy. All patients had minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean, 47 months; range, 24-155 months). Range of motion, Simple Shoulder Test scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeonsscores, visual analog scale scores for function, and health-related quality-of-life measures were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. The RCA, MCT-with-OA, MCT-without-OA, and OA groups all exhibited significant improvements in all outcome scores and in all planes of motion from preoperatively until a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The malunion, nonunion, and inflammatory arthropathy groups showed improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, forward flexion, and abduction. The average changes for all other outcomes and planes of motions were also positive but did not reach statistical significance. After adjustment for age and compared with RCA, female patients with malunion had significantly poorer forward flexion (P < .05), those with OA had significantly better abduction (P < .05), and those with fractures had significantly worse patient satisfaction (P < .05). Among male patients, those with MCTs without OA had significantly worse satisfaction (P < .05). RSA reliably provides improvement regardless of preoperative diagnosis. Although subtle differences exist between male and female patients, improvements in clinical outcome scores were apparent after RSA.

How common are acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?: A systematic review.

Acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have a wide range of incidences in reported case series. This study evaluates their incidence following RSA by systematically reviewing the current literature. A systematic review using the search terms "reverse shoulder", "reverse total shoulder", or "inverted shoulder" was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Studies were included if they reported on RSA outcomes and the incidence rate of acromial and/or scapular spine fractures. The rate of these fractures was evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, RSA indications, and RSA implant design. The review included 90 articles out of 686 identified after exclusions. The incidence rate of acromial and/or scapular spine fractures was 2.8% (253/9048 RSAs). The fracture rate was similar for primary and revision RSA (2.8% vs 2.1%; p = 0.4). Acromial fractures were most common after RSA for inflammatory arthritis (10.9%) and massive rotator cuff tears (3.8%). The incidence was lowest in RSA for post-traumatic arthritis (2.1%) and acute proximal humerus fractures (0%). Lateralized glenosphere design had a significantly higher rate of acromial fractures compared with medial glenosphere designs. Based on current English literature, acromial and/or scapular spine fractures occur at a rate of 2.8% after RSA. The incidence is slightly more common after primary compared with revision arthroplasty. Also, higher rates of acromial fractures are reported in RSA performed for inflammatory arthritis and in the lateralized glenoid design. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:627-634.

Paper #15 - Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary implants is associated with very low reoperation rates

Introduction: The early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were influenced to some extent by the use of first generation implants as well as surgeons' learning curves, resulting in relatively high reoperation rates. As experience has been gained with the procedure and new implants have been introduced, reasons for reoperation and complication rates may have changed. The purpose of this study was to quantify the burden and identify the indications for reoperation after primary RSA using contemporary implants and techniques.

Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary implants is associated with very low reoperation rates

The early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were influenced to some extent by the use of first-generation implants and surgeons' learning curves, resulting in relatively high reoperation rates. The purpose of this study was to quantify the burden of and identify the indications for reoperation after primary RSA using contemporary implants and techniques. A retrospective review of 1649 primary RSAs implanted consecutively between 2009 and 2015 at a single institution was conducted. All arthroplasties were performed by 5 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at a tertiary referral center. Demographic characteristics, indications for primary RSA, and reoperations were analyzed and categorized for trends associated with each type of reoperation performed. A total of 39 reoperations (2.37%) were performed for a variety of indications. Overall, only a few patients with infection or instability required reoperation (0.55%). The most common indications for reoperation were related to the humeral component (1.03%); the majority of humeral component complications were related to a specific design flaw of 1 implant system. RSAs performed for proximal humeral fracture sequelae more commonly underwent reoperation owing to instability or humeral component-related issues; all 4 cases of aseptic humeral stem loosening occurred in the setting of proximal humeral fracture sequela treatment. Only 0.36% of all primary RSAs required reoperation because of glenoid complications. Primary RSA performed with contemporary implants and surgical techniques seems to be associated with a very low rate of reoperation. The most common reasons for reoperation were humeral component fracture for 1 particular implant, humeral loosening, dislocation, infection, and glenoid failure, each occurring at a rate under 1%.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze and compare the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in proximal humeral fracture sequelae (PHFS) in fractures initially treated conservatively versus those initially treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). MethodsIt is a retrospective study that includes all PHFS treated with a RSA from September 2006 to December 2013. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 9 patients (7 females and 2 males; mean age: 79.11 years) treated with RSA due to a fracture sequelae following conservative treatment and 18 patients (15 females and 3 males; mean age: 76.83 years) treated with a RSA owing to a fracture sequelae after ORIF.The functional outcome was recorded with the aid of the pre-surgery Constant Score and at the latest follow-up (minimum of two years). All the patients included underwent an imaging study that included plain X-Rays and a CT scan prior to surgery and plain X-Rays after surgery. All complications and reoperations during follow-up were also recorded. ResultsBoth groups had significantly increased Constant Scores after surgery (p < 0.0001), but the patients in the conservative group had significantly better outcomes for the total Constant Score (p = 0.024), for forward elevation (p = 0.026) and for external rotation (p = 0.004).A total of 4 complications (14.8%) were present during the follow-up period. In the conservative group, 1 patient developed an infection and there were 2 dislocations and 1 infection in the ORIF group. ConclusionThe use of RSA in the treatment of PHFS results in a limited outcome improvement but with an acceptable complication rate. Patients developing PHFS after conservative treatment may expect better outcomes and fewer complications than those developing PHFS after ORIF. Level of evidenceLevel IV, Therapeutic Study.

Does indication matter in the functional outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty? - A comparative retrospective study

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty is done for Cuff Tear Arthropathy (CTA) and other indications. We hypothesize that CTA patients and patients with other indications will have differing functional outcome following RSA. We retrospectively studied 23 patients treated in our center between 2014 and 2017. The patients who were aged 60 and above with normal Deltoid function, normal cognition and a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. Of the 23 patients, 16 had CTA and 7 had either a complex fracture dislocation, arthritis with malunion, excision arthroplasty or a chronic dislocation. We compared the functional outcome using Constant Shoulder Score at a mean follow up of 24.6 months. The post-operative scores were significantly higher in the CTA group, but the magnitude of functional improvement from preoperative status following RSA was either comparable (absolute change) or even better (percentage change) in non-CTA patients compared to CTA patients. There were no significant differences in the complication rates between the two groups. We conclude that one should not be discouraged by the lower values of functional scores in RSA done for non-CTA indications and be aware that the functional improvement following RSA in such complex cases is encouragingly better than that following RSA in CTA.

The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundControversy exists in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in regard to variability in the center of rotation (COR), which modifies the superior-inferior position of the humerus to affect the acromiohumeral interval (AHI), and its effect on the deltoid lever arm (DLA), acromial index (AI), and critical shoulder angle (CSA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the variation in biomechanics and the association with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) measurements.MethodsRadiographs, ROM, and 2-year PRO scores were retrospectively reviewed for 108 patients.ResultsThere was large variability in preoperative and postoperative biomechanics. The COR was medialized 12.01 ± 4.8 mm. The CSA increased 2.64° ± 12.45°. The AHI increased 20.6 ± 9.80 mm. The DLA lengthened 21.21 ± 10.15 mm. The AI increased 0.009 ± 0.3. Postoperative AI positively correlated with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Penn Shoulder Score (P = .03). Specifically, a postoperative AI of 0.62 corresponded to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (72.5 ± 18.3 vs. 62.3 ± 24.7; P = .02) and Penn Shoulder Score (71.2 ± 21.4 vs. 61.8 ± 25.6; P = .05), an average 10 points higher than AI of <0.6. Also, a smaller postoperative CSA (<25°) correlated with improved forward elevation (P = .02).ConclusionsThis is the first study that evaluates the variability of biomechanical factors and their impact on postoperative ROM and PROs. An increased AI and decreased CSA are associated with improved PROs in this study, and a smaller CSA is associated with better forward elevation. Change in the COR, AHI, or DLA, however, did not affect patient outcomes or ROM. Further study is warranted to determine the optimal position.

Effect of humeral tray placement on impingement-free range of motion and muscle moment arms in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundIt has been suggested that onlay humeral tray placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty can affect impingement and muscle functionality. This study investigates biomechanical changes to the reversed shoulder using a variety of tray positional configurations. MethodsThe reconstructed scapula and humerus from 12 CT scans were used to customise a 3D biomechanical model of the shoulder. Each model underwent virtual RSA surgery using a commercially available prosthesis that was reconstructed from an explant. 17 tray positions were tested: the default location with no offset and 16 offset locations (2.5 and 5 mm radial offsets over 45° circumferential intervals). Impingement and muscle moment arms were measured during three standardised activities, and impingement was measured during an activity of daily living. FindingsOffset direction was found to have an effect (P < 0.05) on extra-articular impingement and muscle moment arms for all activities; whereas, offset distance did not (P > 0.05). Overall, impingement-free range of motion was maximised using a posterolateral tray offset and muscle moment arms were maximised using a medial tray offset. An antagonistic relationship between changes to impingement and muscle moment arms due to tray placement was identified and, consequently, the simultaneous maximisation of both outcome measures was not possible. InterpretationThe functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be improved by altering onlay humeral tray placement. Due to the antagonistic relationship between the impingement and muscle moment arms, placement of the tray should be guided by patient-specific characteristics.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Acute Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: Does Tuberosity Healing Improve Clinical Outcomes?

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures and assess the role of tuberosity healing on the outcome. Case series. Multicenter clinical study of Level-2 trauma centers. We included 81 patients with a mean age of 78.5 ± 6.5 years (range, 58.5-90.9 years) and a nonreconstructable proximal humeral fracture. Modular reverse fracture shoulder arthroplasty. We determined range of motion, constant score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score as clinical outcomes and evaluated tuberosity healing at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Tuberosities healed in most patients; 37 patients had completely healed tuberosities, and 33 patients had partially healed tuberosities, whereas 11 patients had unhealed tuberosities. However, no significant differences were found in the functional outcomes among the 3 groups (P > 0.05). Our results with a modular reverse prosthesis confirmed similar constant scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Scores, and tuberosity healing rates as reported in the current clinical evidence for RSA. We could not confirm that tuberosity healing improved functional outcomes; however, it should be noted that tuberosity healing was assessed using standard radiographs. Nevertheless, our study strengthens the consensus that RSA can be recommended for well-selected elderly patients with complex displaced proximal humeral fractures. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prognostic Radiological Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Korean Population.

BackgroundDespite the growing use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), it is associated with relatively frequent complications and uncertain clinical outcomes. We investigated radiological factors affecting clinical outcomes of RSA in the Korean population.MethodsWe evaluated physical findings, radiographic findings, visual analog scale scores for pain and satisfaction, and several functional scores in 179 consecutive patients who underwent RSA at two centers between 2008 and 2014.ResultsIn 146 included RSAs, pain and forward flexion improved with deltoid lengthening (average, 23.5 ± 9.1 mm; p = 0.039). External rotation decreased with medialization (average, 16.8 ± 6.0 mm, p = 0.025), whereas internal rotation showed no correlation with humeral retroversion. Scapular notching (n = 44, 30%) significantly decreased with greater inferior glenosphere overhang (average, 2.94 ± 3.0 mm; p = 0.001), greater prosthesis scapular neck angle (average, 104° ± 10.3°; p = 0.001), greater glenoid neck length (average, 9.8 ± 2.54 mm; p = 0.012), lower inferior baseplate tilt angle (average, 105.5° ± 9.2°; p = 0.009), and varus humeral neck-shaft angle (p = 0.046), and it did not affect ranges of motion and pain, satisfaction, and functional scores. At the final follow-up, medialization was related to improvement in pain and satisfaction, and inferior glenosphere overhang to functional scores.ConclusionsProper amount of deltoid lengthening (mean, 2.3 cm) and inferior glenosphere overhang (mean, 2.9 mm) should be chosen for the better outcomes, while the center of rotation should be individualized according to patient characteristics in the Korean population.

How the greater tuberosity affects clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures

Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures in a large cohort of elderly patients and compare the results in the case of tuberosity excision, failed fixation, or anatomic healing. In this retrospective multicenter study, 420 patients underwent review and radiography with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the status of the greater tuberosity (GT) on the last anteroposterior radiographs: anatomic GT healing (group A, n = 169); GT resorption, malunion, or nonunion (group B, n = 131); and GT excision (group C, n = 120). Complications were recorded; shoulder function, active mobility, and subjective results were assessed. At a mean follow-up of 28 months, the mean Simple Shoulder Value in group A (75%) outperformed the results found in groups B (69%, P < .001) and C (56%, P < .001). Overall, the mean adjusted Constant-Murley score was significantly higher in group A (93% ± 22%) than in group B (82% ± 22%) and group C (80% ± 24%) (P < .001), but there was no difference between groups B and C (P = .88). Anterior active elevation and external rotation were significantly better in group A than in groups B and C (P < .001). The instability rate was significantly higher in group C (n = 15 [12.5%], P < .001) than in group A (n = 2) or group B (n = 3). In elderly patients who have undergone a reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures, anatomic tuberosity healing improves objective and subjective outcomes. GT excision is associated with the worst functional results and increases the risk of postoperative shoulder instability.

The lateralization and distalization shoulder angles are important determinants of clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) designs vary in the lateralization and distalization geometry, which may affect functional outcomes. The purpose was to determine the effect of RSA lateralization and distalization on final functional outcomes by using the "lateralization shoulder angle" (LSA) and the "distalization shoulder angle" (DSA). Forty-six consecutive patients who underwent RSA for cuff tear arthropathy were retrospectively evaluated. Functional outcome and radiographs were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively and compared between implants with or without glenoid lateralization and with or without humeral-sided lateralization. Anteroposterior shoulder radiographs were used to evaluate the LSA and DSA. Both angles showed substantial to almost perfect intrarater and inter-rater agreement. Higher LSA values were found in more lateralized RSAs (P = .027), and values between 75° and 95° were correlated with better active external rotation (quadratic regression analysis R2 = 0.553, P < .001). Postoperative active anterior elevation (R2 = 0.2, P = .008), Constant (rs = 0.29, P = .05), and Activities of Daily Living Requiring External Rotation scores (rs = 0.4 P = .007) had a positive correlation with the LSA. The quadratic regression analysis also showed that a DSA between 40° and 65° resulted in better active anterior elevation (R2 = 0.4, P < .001) and abduction (R2 = 0.4, P < .001). The negative correlation between the LSA and DSA (rs = -0.7, P < .001) revealed that, according to the implant used, the more distally the RSA is placed the less lateralization is achieved. The LSA and the DSA are reproducible measurements that may be used to estimate "lateralization and distalization" after RSA. These measurements are correlated with postoperative clinical outcomes.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus.

The aim of this study was to analyze the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus in association with rotator cuff deficiency or severe stiffness of the shoulder. A total of 38 patients were included: 28 women and ten men. Their mean age at the time of arthroplasty was 73 years (54 to 91). Before the RSA, 18 patients had been treated with open reduction and internal fixation following a fracture. A total of 22 patients had a rotator cuff tear and 11 had severe stiffness of the shoulder with < 0° of external rotation. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years (1.5 to 10). The Constant score and the range of movement of the shoulder were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up. Preoperatively, radiographs in two planes were performed, as well as CT or arthro-CT scans; radiographs were also performed at final follow-up. The mean Constant score improved from 25 points (5 to 47) preoperatively to 57 points (15 to 81) postoperatively. The mean forward elevation of the shoulder increased from 73° (10° to 130°) preoperatively to 117° (15° to 170°) postoperatively. Previous surgery did not influence the outcome. Patients with rotator cuff tears had lower Constant scores than patients without (p = 0.037). Those with preoperative stiffness of the shoulder had lower postoperative external rotation compared with patients without stiffness (p = 0.046). There was no radiographic evidence of loosening. Three complications occurred, leading to revision surgery in two patients. In all, 17 patients rated their result as very good (45%), another 17 as good (45%), two as satisfactory (5%), and two as unsatisfactory (5%). RSA is an effective form of treatment for patients with type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus associated with rotator cuff deficiency or stiffness of the shoulder, with high rates of satisfaction. Rotator cuff tears and stiffness of the shoulder had an adverse effect on the clinical outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:318-23.