Outcomes Of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Articles

Prognostic Value of the Favard Classification for Patients Before and After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy

BackgroundAlthough the Favard classification is commonly utilized by surgeons to describe the supero-inferior morphology of the glenoid when treating rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA), its utility in prognosticating patients’ clinical state before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains unproven. We assessed the prognostic value of the Favard glenoid classification on preoperative clinical state and postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes in RSA. MethodsA prospectively-collected, multi-center database for a single-platform shoulder arthroplasty system was queried for patients with RCA who underwent RSA with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Differences in patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) [SST, ASES, SPADI, VAS Pain, Shoulder Function score], combined patient-reported and clinical-input scores (Constant, UCLA, SAS), active range of motion (ROM) values (forward elevation [FE], abduction, external rotation [ER], internal rotation [IR], radiographic outcomes (humeral radiolucency line rates, scapular notching rate), and the incidence of postoperative complications and revision surgery were compared by glenoid deformity type per the Favard classification. Comparisons were performed to assess the ability of the Favard classification to prognosticate the preoperative, postoperative, and improved state after RSA. Results400 RSAs performed for RCA were included. Comparison of outcomes between Favard glenoid types resulted in 6 pairwise comparisons of 12 clinical outcome metrics, yielding 72 total Favard glenoid pairwise comparisons for each clinical state (preoperative, postoperative, improvement). Of the 216 possible pairwise Favard glenoid type / metric comparisons, statistical significance was only reached for 3% of the combinations (7/216). Among E0, E1, and E2 glenoids, the only statistically significant pairwise comparison identified amongst all three clinical states was a more favorable preoperative ASES score for E0 versus E2 glenoids. Preoperatively, E3 glenoids had poorer ER, IR, and SAS scores compared to E0 glenoids and poorer ER compared to E2 glenoids. Postoperatively, E3 glenoids had a poorer IR score compared to E0 glenoids and poorer ER compared to E1 glenoids. No pairwise differences in pre- to postoperative improvement were found. There were no statistically significant pairwise differences in humeral lucency rate, scapular notching rate, complication rates, or revision rates between Favard glenoid types. ConclusionAlthough useful for describing degenerative changes to the glenohumeral joint, the Favard classification offers little prognostic information regarding patient outcomes before and after RSA aside from poorer pre- and postoperative axial rotation in E3 glenoids. Alternative glenoid classification systems or predictive models should be considered for more precise prognoses of patients undergoing RSA for RCA.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty or Nothing for Patients with Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty or Nothing for Patients with Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Satisfactory Short-Term Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Three- and Four-Part Fractures of the Humeral Head in Octogenarians.

Proximal humeral fractures with severe comminution and poor bone quality are among the most common injuries in the elderly population. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been widely used to manage complex three- and four-part humeral head fractures. The purpose of the present study was to report the result of this technique in the demanding population of octogenarians. Twenty-six patients above the age of 80 years were included in the study andfollowed for a minimum of one-year follow-up. To assess the functional outcomes the postoperative range of motion (ROM), the Constant score, the visual analog scale for pain, and the disability of the arm and shoulder score (DASH) were measured at 6 and 12 months. Radiological assessment and potential complications were also recorded. The mean age of the study population was 81.9 years (81-86) at the time of surgery. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcomes over the follow-up intervals. Shoulder ROM was 125.7o for flexion, 98.2o for abduction, 42.2o for internal rotation, and 43.2o for external rotation at 12 months. The mean Constant, DASH, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were 61.3, 31.9, and 0.5, respectively. Reported complications include one superficial surgical site infection. RSA is a safe and reliable surgical option with satisfactory outcomes to manage complex three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head as it can provide prompt pain relief and function in octogenarians.

Great tuberosity fixation does not affect healing and clinical outcomes in RSA performed in proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Aims of our study were to define whether the great tuberosity (GT) positioning fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after proximal humeral fracture (PHF) could predict tuberosity healing and its impact on clinical outcomes. We enrolled 59 patients treated with cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty after PHF in our institute between 2012 and 2018. The mean follow-up was 57months (± 23.4). We divided patients into two groups according to GT positioning after fixation: Group 1 GT in contact and Group 2 GT detached at least 1mm from humeral diaphysis. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at last follow-up. Overall GT healing rate was 64.4%, (Group 1 70.7%-Group 2 50%). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.047) was found in cortical thickness narrowing at one-third of stem length. We found a correlation between lateral cortical narrowing and GT fixation in non-anatomical position, but we observed no statistically significant differences about GT healing according to GT anatomical or non-anatomical fixation. No differences were found in shoulder function in patients whose tuberosity was healed or failed to heal. GT reduction is not a predictive factor for GT healing; external stress shielding, instead, seems to be decreased in patients with postoperative anatomically reduced GT. In our study, GT healing did not affect clinical outcomes or patient's satisfaction in elderly low-demanding patients.

Effect of subscapularis repair on joint contact forces based on degree of posterior-superior rotator cuff tear severity in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) affect the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, the effects of subscapularis repair on the outcomes of RSA, based on the degree of posterior-superior RCTs, are unclear. This study aimed to examine the effect of subscapularis repair on three-dimensional joint contact forces (JCFs) based on the degree of posterior-superior RCT severity in RSA. Ten human in vivo experimental data were used as input to the musculoskeletal model. A six-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) anatomical shoulder model was developed and validated against three-dimensional JCFs. The 6-DOF musculoskeletal shoulder model of RSA was then developed by importing the reverse shoulder implant into the validated anatomical shoulder model. Based on the various types of posterior-superior RCT severity, inverse dynamic simulations of subscapularis-torn and subscapularis-repaired models of RSA were performed: from isolated supraspinatus tears to partial or massive tears of the infraspinatus and teres minor. The intact rotator cuff model of RSA was also simulated for comparison with the different types of models. Our results showed that the more posterior-superior RCTs progressed in RSA, the more superior JCFs were observed at 90°, 105°, and 120° abduction in the subscapularis-torn model. However, subscapularis repair decreased the superior JCF at those angles sufficiently. In addition, the teres minor muscle-tendon force increased as infraspinatus bundle tears progressed in both the subscapularis-torn and -repaired models, in order to compensate for the reduced force during abduction. However, the teres minor muscle-tendon force was not as high as that of the infraspinatus muscle-tendon, which could result in muscle force imbalance between repaired subscapularis and teres minor. Therefore, our results suggest that repairing the subscapularis and the repairable infraspinatus during RSA can improve glenohumeral joint stability in the superior-inferior direction by restoring muscle force balance between the anterior cuff (i.e., subscapularis) and posterior cuff (i.e., infraspinatus and teres minor). The findings of this study can help clinician decide whether to repair the rotator cuff during RSA to enhance joint stability.

Relationship between the preoperative grip strength and postoperative shoulder strength of patients treated via reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Systemic disorders including diabetes mellitus, obesity, and depression affect the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Sarcopenia (a general skeletal muscle disorder) is common in elderly people, but its effect on patients after RSA is not clear. We hypothesized that the preoperative sarcopenia indices of grip strength and general skeletal muscle mass would correlate with the clinical outcomes of RSA. Grip strength and general skeletal muscle mass were measured in patients scheduled (between 2016 and 2021) for primary RSA to treat cuff tear arthropathy, an unrepairable cuff tear, or osteoarthritis with a large cuff tear. Before surgery, grip strength was measured using a hydraulic dynamometer and general skeletal muscle mass was calculated from the appendicular relative skeletal muscle mass index (aRSMI) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In all, 58 patients were included; the minimal follow-up duration was 12months. The postoperative clinical results (pain, active range of motion, shoulder strength, and functional scores) were evaluated during scheduled outpatient visits. We calculated correlations between the preoperative sarcopenia indices, and the clinical results at the final follow-up. The mean preoperative grip strength and aRSMI were 21.6±4.0kg and 5.98±0.84kg/m2 in females and 30.6±7.5kg and 7.21±0.94kg/m2 in males, respectively; the grip strength and aRSMI were not associated with each other (P=.083). Ten females (25%) and 10 males (56%) met the criteria for sarcopenia. The postoperative abduction shoulder strength and Constant-Murley shoulder score increased significantly with higher preoperative grip strength (R=0.420 and P=.001; and R=0.497 and P<.001, respectively) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was related to the preoperative aRSMI (R=0.320, P=.039). The shoulder strength and functional score after RSA correlated positively with the preoperative grip strength. Measuring grip strength before RSA allows the surgeon to predict shoulder strength after RSA.

Does forearm referencing using a retroversion guide achieve the targeted retroversion of the humeral component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Component positioning affects clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, which necessitates an implantation technique that is reproducible, consistent, and reliable. This study aims to assess the accuracy and precision of positioning the humeral component in planned retroversion using a forearm referencing guide. Computed Tomography (CT) scans of 54 patients (27 males and 27 females) who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy were evaluated. A standardized surgical technique was used to place the humeral stem in 15° of retroversion. Version was assessed intraoperatively visualizing the retroversion guide from above and referencing the forearm axis. Metal subtraction techniques from postoperative CT images allowed for the generation of 3D models of the humerus and for evaluation of the humeral component position. Anatomical humeral plane and implant planes were defined and the retroversion 3D angle between identified planes was recorded for each patient. Accuracy and precision were assessed. A subgroup analysis evaluated differences between male and female patients. The humeral retroversion angle ranged from 0.9° to 22.8°. The majority (81%) of the measurements were less than 15°. Mean retroversion angle (± SD) was 9.9° ± 5.8° (95% CI 8.4°-11.5°) with a mean percent error with respect to 15° of -34% ± 38 (95% CI -23, -44). In the male subgroup (n=27, range 3.8° to 22.5°), the mean retroversion angle was 11.9° ± 5.4° (95% CI 9.8°-14.1°) with a mean percent error with respect to 15° of -21% ± 36 (95% CI -6, -35). In the female subgroup (n=27, range 0.9° to 22.8°), mean retroversion angle was 8.0° ± 5.5° (95% CI 5.8°-10.1°) and the mean percent error with respect to 15° was -47% ± 36 (95% CI -32, -61). The differences between the two gender groups were statistically significant (p=0.006). Referencing the forearm using an extramedullary forearm referencing system to position the humeral stem in a desired retroversion is neither accurate nor precise. There is a non-negligible tendency to achieve a lower retroversion than planned, and the error is more marked in females.

Clinical outcomes are unchanged after a mean of 12 years after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a long-term re-evaluation

BackgroundThe medium-term results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) that has been performed by a single surgeon have been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the minimum 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of these patients. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, 27 patients were evaluated after RSA for massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT) with or without eccentric osteoarthritis (OA) or concentric OA with the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), range of motion (ROM), and a radiologic assessment. ResultsAt a mean 12-year follow-up, the CMS and ROM were significantly improved when compared with the baseline values (all p<0.001). Once stratified by diagnosis, no difference in the ROM or total CMS was found between patients with MRCT with/without eccentric OA and those with concentric OA. The ROM nor CMS decreased when compared to the mid-term values of the previous study, for both the overall population and the diagnosis-stratified groups. Scapular notching was reported in 66.7% of cases that was similar to the data reported at mid-term follow-up. The calcification rate was 59.3% at the long-term evaluation, and there were no differences between the same case-series population (51.9%; p=0.785) and the whole population at mid-term follow-up (47%; p=0.358). ConclusionsRSA led to excellent clinical and functional outcomes for patients up to 17 years postoperatively, and there was no decrease in the CMS over time. No loosening of implants was noted, and the rate of scapular notching was 66%, mostly grade 1 or 2.

Effect of using a small baseplate on the radiological and clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Asian patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using small and standard baseplates in Asian patients, and to investigate the impact of a mismatch in the sizes of the glenoid and the baseplate on the outcomes. This was retrospective analysis of 50 and 33 RSAs using a standard (33.8 mm, ST group) and a small (29.5 mm, SM group) baseplate of the Equinoxe reverse shoulder system, which were undertaken between January 2017 and March 2021. Radiological evaluations included the size of the glenoid, the β-angle, the inclination of the glenoid component, inferior overhang, scapular notching, the location of the central cage in the baseplate within the vault and the mismatch in size between the glenoid and baseplate. Clinical evaluations included the range of motion (ROM) and functional scores. In subgroup analysis, comparisons were performed between those in whom the vault of the glenoid was perforated (VP group) and those in whom it was not perforated (VNP group). Perforation of the vault of the glenoid (p = 0.018) and size mismatch in height (p < 0.001) and width (p = 0.013) were significantly more frequent in the ST group than in the SM group. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and ROM in the two groups, two years postoperatively (all p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis, the VP group had significantly less inferior overhang (p = 0.009), more scapular notching (p = 0.018), and more size mismatch in height (p < 0.001) and width (p = 0.025) than the VNP group. In Asian patients with a small glenoid, using a 29.5 mm small baseplate at the time of RSA was more effective in reducing size mismatch between the glenoid and the baseplate, decreasing the incidence of perforation of the glenoid vault, and achieving optimal positioning of the baseplate compared with the use of a 33.8 mm standard baseplate. However, longer follow-up is required to assess the impact of these findings on the clinical outcomes.

Functional and radiographic outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 10 years

The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, few studies have been published reporting the long-term outcomes of RSA. This study aims to report the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of the Delta Xtend reverse shoulder prosthesis, performed by a single surgeon and with a minimum follow-up of 10years. All RSA procedures performed between 2005 and 2012 were identified. Patients were contacted and invited for a follow-up visit including clinical assessment, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures. Patients with a follow-up of less than 10years were excluded. The revision-free implant survival was calculated at 10years. Between 2005 and 2012, 119 procedures in 116 patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Of these patients, 35 were deceased before reaching the 10-year follow-up and 23 could not be reached. In total, 63 RSAs could be included in 61 patients (response rate: 75%). The median follow-up was 11.7years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.5-13.2). Of the 61 patients, 7 patients underwent a revision after a median of 3years (IQR: 0.2-9.8) during the total follow-up period. The 10-year implant survival was 94% (95% confidence interval: 84-98). At final follow-up, the median anterior elevation was 135° (IQR: 130°-160°), the median abduction was 120° (IQR: 100°-135°), and the median level reached with internal rotation was L5 (IQR: sacrum-L5). The median Auto-Constant score was 68 (IQR: 53-78), the median Subjective Shoulder Value was 80 (IQR: 70-93), and the median pain score was 0.2/10 (IQR: 0-2). In total, radiographs could be obtained in 25 patients (40%). Scapular notching occurred in 10 patients (40%), which was classified as Sirveaux-Nerot grade IV in 3 patients (12%). Ossification occurred in 10 patients (40%), and stress shielding in 2 patients (8%). Radiolucencies were observed around the humeral component in 24 patients (96%) and around the glenoid component in 13 patients (52%). The long-term results of RSA with a Delta Xtend prosthesis are favorable, with long-term improvement in range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures, and a satisfactory implant survival rate. Interestingly, the radiographical analysis showed high prevalence of signs associated with loosening, which did not seem to translate to high complication rates or inferior results.

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study.

This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus arthroscopic supe- rior capsular reconstruction in the treatment of patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and Hamada grade 1-2 glenohumeral arthritis. It is a retrospective case-control study comparing the prospective results of 2 different treatment methods. This retrospective comparison of groups was conducted between May 2016 and May 2020. The study included 40 people with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy who had arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft or reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment. Clinical outcome measures included shoulder range of motion, pain, and functional scores (Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons). The mean age was 61.85 ± 7.56 and 71.10 ± 6.42 years, respectively, for group I [superior capsular reconstruction (n=20)] and group II [superior capsular reconstruction (n=20)]. The mean follow-up was 22.30 ± 8.4 and 32.50 ± 8.11 months, respectively. In the postoperative data, flexion degrees and Constant scores were significantly higher in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P=.007, P = .043). No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in all parameters (P > .05) except abduction. The increase in abduction value in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group was significantly higher than in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P = .003). In addition, postoperative data in all parameters in both groups showed significant changes compared to preoperatively. This study has shown that superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft can provide clinical and func- tional improvement similar to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedure in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy. Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: significantly different characteristics and outcomes in shoulders with intact vs. torn rotator cuff

To compare outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with and without rotator cuff (RC) tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears. We reviewed records of all patients who received RSA for primary OA or secondary OA. All patients had preoperative radiographs, computed tomographic arthrography (CTA), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their shoulders to assess their etiology, glenoid morphology, and fatty infiltration. Pre- and postoperative (at minimum follow-up of 2 years) Constant scores and range of motion were compared between patients who had RSA for primary OA with and without RC tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears. Of the initial cohort of 605 shoulders (583 patients), 153 were lost to follow-up (25.3%), 25 required revision with implant removal (4.1%), and 13 died of causes unrelated to the surgery (2.1%), and left a final cohort of 414 patients. Of the final cohort, 97 had primary OA with intact RC, 62 had primary OA with RC tears, and 255 had secondary OA. Postoperative Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC (73.8±14.3), compared with both primary OA with RC tears (66.1±14.6, P<.001) and secondary OA (64.1±14.8, P<.001). There were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores between primary OA with RC tears and secondary OA. At 2 or more years following RSA, Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC, compared to either primary OA with RC tears or secondary OA, whereas there were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores of shoulders that had primary OA with RC tears vs. secondary OA. The authors recommend distinguishing primary OA with intact RC from primary OA with RC tears, as the two have considerably different characteristics and prognosis following RSA.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty following failed rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an established operative treatment for failed rotator cuff repair (RCR) that may not be amenable to revision repair. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing RSA following prior failed RCR compared with patients without prior RCR undergoing primary RSA. Methods A systematic search of articles in Pubmed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. Comparative studies assessing outcomes of RSA after failed RCR versus primary RSA were included. Results Seven studies with 2149 total patients were included; 760 patients had a prior RCR and 1389 patients did not have a prior RCR. Prior failed RCR resulted in significantly lower postoperative ASES scores (mean difference [MD], −8.31 95% confidence interval [CI] −10.96, −5.66), less forward flexion (MD, −6.71 95%CI −11.75, −1.67), and higher VAS pain scores (MD; 0.85, 95% CI 0.47, 1.22) when compared to primary RSA. There were no significant differences in external rotation, complications rate, or rate of revision. Conclusion This study found that failed RCR prior to RSA was associated with lower functional outcomes scores, higher pain scores, and worse range of motion compared to primary RSA without prior RCR.

Short term Functional Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Following Three-Dimensional Planning is Similar Whether Placed with a Standard Guide or Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI).

Preoperative assessment of the glenoid and surgical placement of the initial guide wire are important in implant positioning during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and patient specific instrumentation (PSI) have improved the placement of the glenoid component, but the impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare short term clinical outcomes after rTSA based on intraoperative technique for central guidewire placement in a cohort of patients that had preoperative 3D planning. A retrospective matched analysis was performed from a multicenter prospective cohort of patients who underwent rTSA with preoperative 3D planning and a minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the technique utilized for glenoid guide pin placement: 1) Standard manufacture guide (SG) that was not customized or 2) PSI. Patient reported outcomes (PROs), active range of motion (ROM), and strength measures were compared between the groups. The ASES score was used to assess the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS). One hundred seventy patients met the study criteria, including 56 performed with SGs and 122 with PSI. There was no difference in PROs between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the percentage of patients that achieved an ASES MCID, SCB, or PASS. Improvement in internal rotation to the nearest spinal level (p < .001) and at 90° (p = .002) were higher in the SG group and, but likely explained by differences in glenoid lateralization utilized. Improvement in abduction strength (p < .001) and external rotation strength (p = .010) were higher in the PSI group. rTSA performed following preoperative 3D planning leads to similar improvement in PROs regardless of whether a SG or PSI are utilized intraoperatively for central glenoid wire placement. Greater improvement in postoperative strength was observed with the use of PSI, but the clinical significance of this finding is unclear.

Narrative review of influence of prosthesis lateralization on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: glenoid vs. humerus vs. combined.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become a common orthopaedic procedure, with a growing number of cases annually for multiple indications, such as rotator cuff arthropathy, osteoarthritis, or fractures of the proximal humerus, to reduce pain and restore shoulder mobility. Prosthesis design and various recent improvements aim to enhance range of motion (ROM) and stability and to limit component loosening and other potential complications. Many of these well-known issues could theoretically be improved by glenoid, humeral, or combined component lateralization. The objective of this article is to provide an up-to-date literature overview, present available options, and discuss the rationale behind lateralization of certain components, as well as their combined impact on outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. PubMed and Scopus databases from 2003 to 2023 were searched and screened for studies, including systematic reviews, on the influence of glenoid, humeral, and combined component lateralization that served for narrative review of rationale behind such design. Currently, a number of computer simulations, anatomic studies, and limited clinical references aim to support the rationale behind glenoid augmentation, variable humeral neck-shaft angle (NSA), or humeral tray design. The utility of lateralization has not yet been clinically established. Randomized, long-term clinical outcome studies are still needed to reach a verdict going beyond surgeon preference and case-specific indications.

Lateralization and distalization shoulder angles do not predict outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy

In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), there is a plethora of measurements regarding implant lateralization and distalization to optimize the center of rotation. Two specific measurements known as the lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA) have been the recent focus of studies to assess their association with RSA and postoperative function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic clinical value of the LSA and DSA in a large cohort of patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) who were treated with different RSA systems. Two local shoulder arthroplasty registries were reviewed for all RSA patients documented with a radiological assessment and complete 2-year follow-up examination. The main inclusion criterion was primary RSA for patients with CTA. Any patients with either a complete teres minor tear, os acromiale or acromial stress fractures reported between the time of surgery and the 24-month follow-up were excluded. Five different RSA implant systems with four different neck-shaft angles were assessed. The Constant Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and range of motion (ROM) at two years were correlated with both LSA and DSA assessed on 6-month anteroposterior radiographs. Linear and parabolic univariable regressions were calculated for both shoulder angles, for each prosthesis system and for the entire patient cohort. Between May 2006 and November 2019, there were a total of 630 CTA patients who had undergone primary RSA. Of this large cohort, 270 were treated with the Promos Reverse (neck-shaft angle [NSA], 155°), 44 with the Aequalis Reversed II (NSA, 155°), 62 with the Lima SMR Reverse (150°), 25 with the Aequalis Ascend Flex (145°) and 229 with the Univers Revers (135°) prosthesis systems. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) LSA was 78° (10; range, 6-107) and the mean DSA was 51° (10; range, 7-91). The average CS at 24 months follow-up was 68.1 (SD: 13; 13-96) points. Neither the linear nor parabolic regression calculations for LSA or DSA revealed significant associations with any of the clinical outcomes. Different patients may achieve different clinical outcomes despite having identical LSA and DSA values. There is no association between angular radiographic measurements and 2-year functional outcome.

The use of a large diameter glenosphere in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients undergoing tuberosity removal.

Prosthetic replacement with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly indicated for complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in elderly patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA performed for comminuted PHFs, without periprosthetic reconstruction of the tuberosities. Our hypothesis was that a large diameter glenosphere could ensure satisfactory RSA mobility and stability, regardless of tuberosity removal. We selected 32 patients (4 men, 28 women) with comminuted PHFs who underwent RSA with tuberosity excision and implantation of a 44-mm glenosphere between 2009 and 2015. Active range of motion (ROM), stability, Constant-Murley Score (CMS) (1) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) (2) were assessed one year and four years after surgery. Clinical and radiological information were collected for 23 patients (72%). At one-year follow-up, active anterior elevation (AE) was 96±28 degrees, external rotation with adducted arm (ER1) 9±7 degrees, external rotation with abducted arm (ER2) 14±10 degrees, internal rotation (IR) to L4; CMS was 56±10 and SSV 65±22. Clinical assessment at 4-year follow up showed a decrease in active ROM (AE was 88±20 degrees, ER1 8±2 degrees, ER2 12±10 degrees, IR to L4), CMS (52±9) and SSV (62±8). No RSA dislocation occurred during the study. In 4 patients, grade I glenoid notching without any sign of component loosening was observed 4 years after surgery. A large diameter glenosphere does not ensure results comparable to those achieved after RSA with tuberosity reconstruction. However, the 44-mm glenosphere was effective in preventing RSA instability.

Anterior deltoid muscle reflection using a deltopectoral approach is safe and does not influence outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

The deltopectoral approach is well accepted for shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The extended deltopectoral approach with detachment of the anterior deltoid from the clavicle allows increased joint exposure and can protect the anterior deltoid from traction injury. The efficacy of this extended approach has been demonstrated in anatomical total shoulder replacement surgery. However, this has not been shown in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the extended deltopectoral approach in RSA. The secondary aim was to evaluate the performance of the deltoid reflection approach in terms of complications, surgical, functional and radiological outcomes up to 24 months post-surgery. A prospective non-randomized comparative study was performed between January 2012 and October 2020 including 77 patients in the deltoid reflection group and 73 patients in the comparative group. Decision for inclusion was based on patient and surgeon factors. Complications were recorded. Patients were followed up for at least 24 months to evaluate their shoulder function and ultrasound evaluation. Functional outcome measures included the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), pain intensity (VAS 0-100), range of motion (forward flexion (FF), abduction (AD), and external rotation (ER)). A regression analysis was performed to evaluate any factors of influence on the VAS. There were no significant differences in the rate of complications between the two groups (14.5% in the deltoid reflection group and 13.8% in the comparative group, p=0.915). Ultrasound evaluation was available in 64 (83.1%) patients, and no proximal detachment was observed. In addition, there were no significant differences in functional outcome measures both preoperatively and at 24 months post-surgery between the groups on Mean VAS pain, OSS, DASH, ASES, FF, ABD, and ER. Adjustment for possible confounders in a regression model indicated that only prior surgery significantly influenced the VAS pain (p=0.031, 95%CI 0.574 - 11.67) after surgery. Deltoid reflection (p=0.068), age (p=0.466), sex (p=0.936), glenoid graft (p=0.091), prosthesis manufacturer (p=0.382) and preop VAS score (p=0.362) were not of influence. Results of this study show an extended deltopectoral approach for RSA is safe. Selected reflection of the anterior deltoid muscle improved exposure and prevents anterior deltoid muscle injury followed by re-attachment. Patients had similar functional scores preop and at 24 months compared to a comparative group. Furthermore, ultrasound evaluation showed intact re-attachments.

Optimizing Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Rehabilitation, Expected Outcomes, and Maximizing Return to Activities.

Given the touted clinical and patient-reported outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in improving pain and restoring function, shoulder surgeons are rapidly expanding the indications and utilization of RTSA. Despite its increasing use, the ideal post-operative management ensuring the best patient outcomes is still debated. This review synthesizes the current literature regarding the impact of post-operative immobilization and rehabilitation on clinical outcomes following RTSA including return to sport. Literature regarding the various facets of post-operative rehabilitation is heterogeneous in both methodology and quality. While most surgeons recommend 4-6weeks of immobilization post-operatively, two recent prospective studies have shown that early motion following RTSA is both safe and effective with low complication rates and significant improvements in patient-reported outcome scores. Furthermore, no studies currently exist assessing the use of home-based therapy following RTSA. However, there is an ongoing prospective, randomized control trial assessing patient-reported and clinical outcomes which will help shed light on the clinical and economic value of home therapy. Finally, surgeons have varying opinions regarding return to higher level activities following RTSA. Despite no clear consensus, there is growing evidence that elderly patients are able to return to sport (e.g., golf, tennis) safely, though caution must be taken with younger or more high-functioning patients. While post-operative rehabilitation is believed to be essential to maximize outcomes following RTSA, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence that guides current rehabilitation protocols. There is no consensus regarding type of immobilization, timing of rehabilitation, or need for formal therapist-directed rehabilitation versus physician-guided home exercise. Additionally, surgeons have varied opinions regarding return to higher level activities and sports following RTSA. There is burgeoning evidence that elderly patients can return to sport safely, though caution must be taken with younger patients. Further research is needed to clarify the optimal rehabilitation protocols and return to sport guidelines.

Comparison of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with inflammatory arthritis.

End-stage glenohumeral joint arthritis is common in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are both indicated in this setting. RSA is often considered based on the impacts of long-standing inflammatory arthritis including glenoid and humeral bone erosion and rotator cuff insufficiency. However, acromial and scapular spine fractures following RSA have been reported more commonly in these patients, which can have a significant impact on outcomes. Currently, no study has directly compared the efficacy and complication rates of RSA vs. TSA in patients with inflammatory arthritis. This study aimed to investigate differences in clinical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing RSA vs. TSA with glenohumeral inflammatory arthritis. We performed a retrospective review of 86 patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with primary RSA (n=43) or TSA (n=43) with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, visual analog scale scores for pain and function, active range of motion, and patient self-ratings of upper-extremity normality (Subjective Assessment of Normal Evaluation [SANE]) were collected preoperatively and at minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic classification of preoperative glenoid and humeral bone loss was performed, and postoperative complications were observed. Revision and complication details were compared. The study cohort had an average age of 72.1 years (range, 31-92 years) and average follow-up period of 51.6 months (range, 22-159 months). Both the RSA and TSA cohorts demonstrated improvements in patient-reported outcome measures and ranges of motion; however, patients treated with TSA showed a greater postoperative final Simple Shoulder Test score (P<.001), visual analog scale score for function (P=.0347), active elevation (P=.0331), active external rotation (P<.001), active internal rotation (P=.005), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score (P=.0161). Analysis of complication rates demonstrated no statistically significant difference between cohorts. Four acromial fractures occurred in the RSA group. When RSA patients who sustainedacromial fractures were removed from the analysis, there were minimal differences in outcomes between the RSA and TSA cohorts. TSA in patients with inflammatory arthritis leads to improved clinical outcomes but higher early revision rates when compared with RSA. RSA outcomes are negatively impacted by a high rate of postoperative acromial fractures.