Outcomes Of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Articles

Humeral stem alignment of curved short stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Varus/Valgus alignment is not a determinant for clinical outcomes

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the influence of curved short stem alignment within the proximal humerus on the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the varus/valgus alignment would yield clinical outcomes comparable to those of a neutral alignment. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 167 patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Aequalis Ascend Flex implant between January 2017 and December 2021. The study categorized the patients into three groups based on the angle difference between the humeral axis and the stem axis: neutral group (GN, defined as within ±5 degrees), valgus group (GL), and varus group (GR). Functional outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale pain score, subjective shoulder value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder score, and active range of motion. Routine radiographic evaluations were also conducted to assess the filling ratio and bone resorption. ResultsAmong 138 patients, 89 were in the GN group, 37 (27%) in the GL group, and 12 (9%) in the GR group. The average degree of varus alignment was 6 (range from 5 to 7 degrees), while the average degree of valgus alignment was -7 (range from -8 to -5 degrees). According to our findings, the clinical outcomes did not exhibit significant differences between the three groups. Furthermore, the radiological outcomes showed no significant differences among the three groups. ConclusionsCompared to neutral alignment, varus or valgus alignment of the humeral stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a curved short stem does not significantly affect clinical outcomes.

Mid-term Clinical Outcomes after Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty are Comparable between Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and those with Osteoarthritis

Background: To investigate the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, and compare the finding to those in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods: The study included 24 patients (11 with RA and 13 with OA) who underwent primary RSA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Clinical data, including range of motion (ROM; flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) and PRO measures (Shoulder36 questionnaire and disability/symptom scale in Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QuickDASH-DS]), were assessed. Results: ROM, Shoulder36 scores (except sports ability scores), and QuickDASH-DS in the RA group, and ROM (expect internal rotation), Shoulder36 scores (except general health scores), and QuickDASH-DS scores in the OA group were significantly improved at follow-up than the preoperative state. At follow-up, there was no significant difference found in any of the variables between the RA and OA groups (flexion: 116.4° vs. 133.1°, P = 0.102; abduction: 100.5° vs. 120.8°, P = 0.159; pain score in Shoulder36: 1.8 vs. 2.1, P = 0.397; ROM score in Shoulder36: 2.1 vs. 2.1, P = 0.578; muscle strength in Shoulder36: 1.8 vs. 1.9, P = 0.680; QuickDASH-DS score: 48.1 vs. 32.7, P = 0.059). Conclusion: The mid-term clinical results after RSA were comparable between patients with RA and those with OA. RSA can be considered the surgical treatment of shoulder in both patients with RA and those with OA.

Assessing the Efficacy: Mid-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the Comprehensive Short Stem System in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

BackgroundFor degenerative shoulder disease, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has proven successful; however, problems such as scapular notching and instability still exist. These difficulties are intended to be addressed by recently improved prosthesis designs with reduced neck-shaft angles (NSA). Still, there are issues with complications, particularly with the humerus. In an effort to avoid these problems and maintain bone stock, a recently designed straight-short-stem humeral component was used; however, yet its clinical and radiological outcomes in RSA remain largely unexplored. Material and MethodsUsing a 55mm straight short stem (Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System; Zimmer Biomet), a retrospective analysis of 93 patients undergoing primary RSA was carried out. Clinical assessments, including scores and range of motion, were conducted both before and after surgery. Complications, bone adaptation, and stem alignment were all evaluated radiographically. Significant correlations between postoperative shoulder movements and function were linked with angles of prosthesis lateralization and distalization. ResultsPatients demonstrated significant improvements in clinical scores at 35-month follow-up on average: Constant-Murley (76.4 ± 13.4), ASES (84.8 ± 16.5), DASH (17.1 ± 15.8), and UCLA (7.1 ± 1.5). Radiographic assessments showed no stem loosening and stable implant attachment. There was no scapular notching, and there were noticeable improvements in shoulder range of motion and function. Discussion and ConclusionThis study validates the efficacy of a straight short stem for acceptable clinical outcomes and implant stability in RSA. Notably, it demonstrates specific angle ranges crucial for optimal post-surgical shoulder function. The findings suggest this stem design presents potential benefits in RSA, highlighting its safety and effectiveness while providing insights for future clinical strategies. The study contributes valuable data toward understanding and enhancing patient outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty procedures.

Treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears by different surgical technigues: comparative analysis of early outcomes

Background. Massive rotator cuff tears are up to 40% and can progress to the stage of irreparable ones. Nowadays, there are many treatment options available for irreparable rotator cuff injuries, from conservative treatment and arthroscopic reconstructions to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Currently, the comparative effectiveness of various treatment methods remains uncertain, and therefore there is no clear algorithm for choosing treatment tactics of such orthopedic shoulder pathologies. The aim of the study is to compare short-term treatment outcomes of patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears using arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair, latissimus dorsi tendon transfer, pectoralis major tendon transfer and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Methods. The study enrolled 75 patients who underwent the following types of surgical interventions: partial arthroscopic repair, posterior and anterior arthroscopically assisted latissimus dorsi tendon transfer, pectoralis major tendon transfer and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Treatment results were assessed using measurements of the range of active movements in the shoulder joint, the ASES and Constant-Murley Score (CMS) questionnaires, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), assessment of radiographs and MRI. The assessments were performed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results. In all groups, there was a statistically significant improvement by all indicators (p0.05). Clinical and functional results at the short-term follow-up after partial rotator cuff repair and various options of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer are largely comparable, while at the same time superior to the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and pectoralis major tendon transfer. Conclusions. The use of partial rotator cuff repair and musculotendinous transfers at the short-term follow-up gives comparable and better results in comparison with the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, which allows to consider “joint-preserving” interventions as an option in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Operative treatment of acromial and scapular spine fracture nonunions complicating reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundFractures of the acromion and spine can have a major impact on the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with respect to pain, motion, and function. Reports on internal fixation for these fractures are isolated to small series or case reports with variable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acromion or spine fractures encountered before or after RSA and describe our evolution of fixation techniques. MethodsBetween 2011 and 2023, 22 fractures or nonunions of the acromion or spine of the scapula underwent ORIF at a single institution and were followed for a minimum of 1 year. In 16 shoulders, fractures occurred after RSA, whereas 5 shoulders underwent ORIF prior to RSA. One shoulder had undergone prior failed ORIF elsewhere and revision ORIF was performed at our institution. There were 10 males and 12 females with a mean age of 67 (SD=15.1) years. Fixation strategies included single (n=11) and double plate fixation (n=11). Kruskal-Wallis one-way analyses of variance were used to analyze continuous variables and Chi-square tests employed for categorical variables. ResultsOf the 5 fractures treated with ORIF pre-RSA, 1 shoulder suffered an additional fracture medial to the hardware and 1 required additional bone grafting for incomplete union at the time of RSA. These 5 shoulders all underwent RSA uneventfully, but one fracture experienced late displacement of the scapular spine nonunion, leading to plate removal. Of the 16 post-RSA ORIF shoulders, radiographic union was confirmed in 14 and substantial residual inferior angulation identified in 3. New fractures occurred after ORIF in 5 shoulders. For patients who underwent ORIF after RSA, pain scores improved from a mean of 8 to 1.9 points, with more modest elevation gains (58.2° to 91.3° pre- and postoperatively, respectively). ConclusionsORIF of acromion and scapular spine fractures or nonunions in the setting of RSA have the potential to lead to union. When these fractures and nonunions are encountered prior to RSA, ORIF allows for uneventful RSA implantation, but secondary displacement may occur. ORIF seems to lead to improvements in pain, but more modest improvements in motion and function. Our fixation strategy has evolved to (1) dual plating, (2) spanning the whole length of the spine with one of the plates, (3) use of hook features under the acromion or os trigonum if possible, and (4) liberal use of bone graft.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for patients with cuff tear arthropathy: do clinical outcomes differ by inlay vs. onlay design?

The influence of position of the humeral tray (inlay or onlay) on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with cuff tear arthropathy treated with RSA systems with inlay or onlay humeral tray design, similar neck-shaft angles, and lateralized glenospheres. This was a retrospective study of prospectively obtained data from 1 tertiary care center. We identified all patients who underwent primary RSA between 2009 and 2017 (N=511). We included 102 patients with diagnosed cuff tear arthropathy treated with RSA prostheses with a lateralized glenosphere and 135° neck-shaft angle (with either an inlay or onlay humeral tray design) who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (mean, 44months; range, 24-125months). Sixty-three patients (62%) had an inlay humeral tray (inlay group) and 39 (38%) had an onlay tray (onlay group). All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative evaluations, including measures of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), shoulder range of motion (ROM) testing, and radiographic imaging. Clinical relevance of changes in PROs and ROM was evaluated using published values for minimal clinically important differences. The 2 groups did not differ by demographic characteristics except for a higher proportion of women in the inlay group (75%) than in the onlay group (56%) (P=.04). Preoperative PROs and ROM were not significantly different between groups. At final follow-up, PROs and ROM were not different between groups in terms of statistical significance or clinical relevance. We found no significant differences in the rate of baseplate loosening (inlay, 3.2% vs. onlay, 5.1%, P=.63), revision surgery (inlay, 0% vs. onlay 5.1%, P=.07), acromial stress fracture (inlay, 3.2% vs. onlay, 5.1%, P=.63), prosthesis dislocation (inlay, 0% vs. onlay, 2.6%, P=.20), or scapular notching (inlay, 21% vs. onlay, 7.7%, P=.08). At 2-year minimum follow-up, the position of the humeral tray in RSA prostheses (either inlay or onlay) for cuff tear arthropathy was not associated with PROs, shoulder ROM, or rates of complications, including baseplate loosening, acromial stress fracture, and scapular notching.

Prognostic value of the Favard classification for patients before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty performed for rotator cuff tear arthropathy

BackgroundAlthough the Favard classification is commonly utilized by surgeons to describe the supero-inferior morphology of the glenoid when treating rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA), its utility in prognosticating patients’ clinical state before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains unproven. We assessed the prognostic value of the Favard glenoid classification on preoperative clinical state and postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes in RSA. MethodsA prospectively collected, multicenter database for a single-platform shoulder arthroplasty system was queried for patients with RCA who underwent RSA with a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Differences in patient reported outcome scores (PROMs) (Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, visual analog scale pain, Shoulder Function score), combined patient-reported and clinical-input scores (Constant, University of California Los Angeles, Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart), active range of motion values (forward elevation, abduction, external rotation [ER], internal rotation [IR]), radiographic outcomes (humeral radiolucency line rates, scapular notching rate), and the incidence of postoperative complications and revision surgery were compared by glenoid deformity type per the Favard classification. Comparisons were performed to assess the ability of the Favard classification to prognosticate the preoperative, postoperative, and improved state after RSA. Results400 RSAs performed for RCA were included. Comparison of outcomes between Favard glenoid types resulted in 6 pairwise comparisons of 12 clinical outcome metrics, yielding 72 total Favard glenoid pairwise comparisons for each clinical state (preoperative, postoperative, improvement). Of the 216 possible pairwise Favard glenoid type/metric comparisons, statistical significance was only reached for 3% of the combinations (7/216). Among E0, E1, and E2 glenoids, the only statistically significant pairwise comparison identified among all three clinical states was a more favorable preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score for E0 vs. E2 glenoids. Preoperatively, E3 glenoids had poorer ER, IR, and Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart scores compared to E0 glenoids and poorer ER compared to E2 glenoids. Postoperatively, E3 glenoids had a poorer IR score compared to E0 glenoids and poorer ER compared to E1 glenoids. No pairwise differences in preoperative to postoperative improvement were found. There were no statistically significant pairwise differences in humeral lucency rate, scapular notching rate, complication rates, or revision rates between Favard glenoid types. ConclusionAlthough useful for describing degenerative changes to the glenohumeral joint, the Favard classification offers little prognostic information regarding patient outcomes before and after RSA aside from poorer preoperative and postoperative axial rotation in E3 glenoids. Alternative glenoid classification systems or predictive models should be considered for more precise prognoses of patients undergoing RSA for RCA.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty or nothing for patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial

The benefits of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to nonoperative treatment for patients presenting with complex proximal fractures have been rarely explored. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the functional results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of nonsurgical treatment in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. A multicentric prospective randomized control trial of patients older than 70years who sustained an acute proximal humeral fracture (3 or 4 parts), with less than 3weeks of evolution, and had no previous condition or surgery on the affected shoulder was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (implantation of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty and tuberosities reattachment) or the control group (nonoperative treatment). Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at the 1-year follow-up. Complications and reinterventions were considered secondary outcomes. The power of the study relied on the inclusion of 81 patients to recognize a statistically significant difference of 10 points between CMS scores in the groups. Analysis was performed based on the intention to treat principle. Eighty-one patients were randomized to surgical treatment or nonoperative treatment, while 66 patients completed the 1-year follow-up evaluation. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age (76.1 yo vs. 77.43 yo, P=.43), sex (81.08% women in the surgical group vs. 84.09% in the nonoperative group, P=.72), or type of fracture according to Neer's classification system (P=.06). At the 1-year follow-up, the group assigned to undergo the intervention had better functional outcomes than the nonoperative treatment group (mean CMS; 61.24, SD: 13.33 vs. mean CMS: 52.44, SD: 16.22, P: .02), with a mean difference of 8.84 points, 95% CI (1.57, 16.11). Two patients in the intervention group (6.5%) suffered major complications (periprosthetic joint infection and axillary nerve palsy). No major complications were observed in the nonoperative group. One patient in the intervention group underwent secondary surgery for a periprosthetic joint infection. Treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides superior functional outcomes compared with conservative treatment for patients presenting with an acute proximal humeral fracture. The difference in CMS is close to the clinically significant thresholds, and some harms are associated with the operative treatment.

Satisfactory Short-Term Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Three- and Four-Part Fractures of the Humeral Head in Octogenarians.

Proximal humeral fractures with severe comminution and poor bone quality are among the most common injuries in the elderly population. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been widely used to manage complex three- and four-part humeral head fractures. The purpose of the present study was to report the result of this technique in the demanding population of octogenarians. Twenty-six patients above the age of 80 years were included in the study andfollowed for a minimum of one-year follow-up. To assess the functional outcomes the postoperative range of motion (ROM), the Constant score, the visual analog scale for pain, and the disability of the arm and shoulder score (DASH) were measured at 6 and 12 months. Radiological assessment and potential complications were also recorded. The mean age of the study population was 81.9 years (81-86) at the time of surgery. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcomes over the follow-up intervals. Shoulder ROM was 125.7o for flexion, 98.2o for abduction, 42.2o for internal rotation, and 43.2o for external rotation at 12 months. The mean Constant, DASH, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were 61.3, 31.9, and 0.5, respectively. Reported complications include one superficial surgical site infection. RSA is a safe and reliable surgical option with satisfactory outcomes to manage complex three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head as it can provide prompt pain relief and function in octogenarians.

Great tuberosity fixation does not affect healing and clinical outcomes in RSA performed in proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Aims of our study were to define whether the great tuberosity (GT) positioning fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after proximal humeral fracture (PHF) could predict tuberosity healing and its impact on clinical outcomes. We enrolled 59 patients treated with cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty after PHF in our institute between 2012 and 2018. The mean follow-up was 57months (± 23.4). We divided patients into two groups according to GT positioning after fixation: Group 1 GT in contact and Group 2 GT detached at least 1mm from humeral diaphysis. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at last follow-up. Overall GT healing rate was 64.4%, (Group 1 70.7%-Group 2 50%). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.047) was found in cortical thickness narrowing at one-third of stem length. We found a correlation between lateral cortical narrowing and GT fixation in non-anatomical position, but we observed no statistically significant differences about GT healing according to GT anatomical or non-anatomical fixation. No differences were found in shoulder function in patients whose tuberosity was healed or failed to heal. GT reduction is not a predictive factor for GT healing; external stress shielding, instead, seems to be decreased in patients with postoperative anatomically reduced GT. In our study, GT healing did not affect clinical outcomes or patient's satisfaction in elderly low-demanding patients.

Locked Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiological Short-Term Results.

To evaluate both the short-term clinical and radiological results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with uncemented locked stem in the management of a proximal humerus fracture (PHFs) in the elderly. Retrospective study including 40 consecutive 3-4 part proximal humerus fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a minimum of 24 months follow-up. In all the cases, the greater tuberosity (GT) was reattached with a standardized suture technique and a local horseshoe bone graft. All the patients were assessed at the 24-month follow-up with Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Visual Analog Score (VAS). Radiographic healing of the greater tuberosity was noted in addition to stem locking screws radiographic changes. Complications and revision rates were reported. Mean final CMS for this cohort was 80 points. The greater tuberosity healed in the anatomic position in 90% of the cases (N = 36), obtaining an average CMS of 80 in these patients. Healing of the greater tuberosity did not occur in 10% of the cases (N = 4), obtaining an average CMS of 60. All patients scored above 100° in forward elevation with a mean of 140°. Mean active external rotation was 30°. Low-grade scapular notching was reported in <1% of the cases. Major complications were reported in one patient with an acromial fracture. No complications or loosening of stem locking screws were noted. There were no reoperations. In the elderly population, reverse shoulder arthroplasty utilizing a fracture-specific locking stem, low-profile metaphysis, suture-friendly groove, meticulous suture technique, and local bone grafting allows adequate fixation, variable prosthesis height adjustment, and enhances greater tuberosity healing. This approach yields positive short-term clinical outcomes without complications related to the stem's locking screws. Level IV Retrospective Case Series.

Effect of subscapularis repair on joint contact forces based on degree of posterior-superior rotator cuff tear severity in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) affect the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, the effects of subscapularis repair on the outcomes of RSA, based on the degree of posterior-superior RCTs, are unclear. This study aimed to examine the effect of subscapularis repair on three-dimensional joint contact forces (JCFs) based on the degree of posterior-superior RCT severity in RSA. Ten human in vivo experimental data were used as input to the musculoskeletal model. A six-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) anatomical shoulder model was developed and validated against three-dimensional JCFs. The 6-DOF musculoskeletal shoulder model of RSA was then developed by importing the reverse shoulder implant into the validated anatomical shoulder model. Based on the various types of posterior-superior RCT severity, inverse dynamic simulations of subscapularis-torn and subscapularis-repaired models of RSA were performed: from isolated supraspinatus tears to partial or massive tears of the infraspinatus and teres minor. The intact rotator cuff model of RSA was also simulated for comparison with the different types of models. Our results showed that the more posterior-superior RCTs progressed in RSA, the more superior JCFs were observed at 90°, 105°, and 120° abduction in the subscapularis-torn model. However, subscapularis repair decreased the superior JCF at those angles sufficiently. In addition, the teres minor muscle-tendon force increased as infraspinatus bundle tears progressed in both the subscapularis-torn and -repaired models, in order to compensate for the reduced force during abduction. However, the teres minor muscle-tendon force was not as high as that of the infraspinatus muscle-tendon, which could result in muscle force imbalance between repaired subscapularis and teres minor. Therefore, our results suggest that repairing the subscapularis and the repairable infraspinatus during RSA can improve glenohumeral joint stability in the superior-inferior direction by restoring muscle force balance between the anterior cuff (i.e., subscapularis) and posterior cuff (i.e., infraspinatus and teres minor). The findings of this study can help clinician decide whether to repair the rotator cuff during RSA to enhance joint stability.

Relationship between the preoperative grip strength and postoperative shoulder strength of patients treated via reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Systemic disorders including diabetes mellitus, obesity, and depression affect the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Sarcopenia (a general skeletal muscle disorder) is common in elderly people, but its effect on patients after RSA is not clear. We hypothesized that the preoperative sarcopenia indices of grip strength and general skeletal muscle mass would correlate with the clinical outcomes of RSA. Grip strength and general skeletal muscle mass were measured in patients scheduled (between 2016 and 2021) for primary RSA to treat cuff tear arthropathy, an unrepairable cuff tear, or osteoarthritis with a large cuff tear. Before surgery, grip strength was measured using a hydraulic dynamometer and general skeletal muscle mass was calculated from the appendicular relative skeletal muscle mass index (aRSMI) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In all, 58 patients were included; the minimal follow-up duration was 12months. The postoperative clinical results (pain, active range of motion, shoulder strength, and functional scores) were evaluated during scheduled outpatient visits. We calculated correlations between the preoperative sarcopenia indices, and the clinical results at the final follow-up. The mean preoperative grip strength and aRSMI were 21.6±4.0kg and 5.98±0.84kg/m2 in females and 30.6±7.5kg and 7.21±0.94kg/m2 in males, respectively; the grip strength and aRSMI were not associated with each other (P=.083). Ten females (25%) and 10 males (56%) met the criteria for sarcopenia. The postoperative abduction shoulder strength and Constant-Murley shoulder score increased significantly with higher preoperative grip strength (R=0.420 and P=.001; and R=0.497 and P<.001, respectively) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was related to the preoperative aRSMI (R=0.320, P=.039). The shoulder strength and functional score after RSA correlated positively with the preoperative grip strength. Measuring grip strength before RSA allows the surgeon to predict shoulder strength after RSA.

Does forearm referencing using a retroversion guide achieve the targeted retroversion of the humeral component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Component positioning affects clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, which necessitates an implantation technique that is reproducible, consistent, and reliable. This study aims to assess the accuracy and precision of positioning the humeral component in planned retroversion using a forearm referencing guide. Computed tomography scans of 54 patients (27 males and 27 females) who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy were evaluated. A standardized surgical technique was used to place the humeral stem in 15° of retroversion. Version was assessed intraoperatively visualizing the retroversion guide from above and referencing the forearm axis. Metal subtraction techniques from postoperative computed tomography images allowed for the generation of 3D models of the humerus and for evaluation of the humeral component position. Anatomical humeral plane and implant planes were defined and the retroversion 3D angle between identified planes was recorded for each patient. Accuracy and precision were assessed. A subgroup analysis evaluated differences between male and female patients. The humeral retroversion angle ranged from 0.9° to 22.8°. The majority (81%) of the measurements were less than 15°. Mean retroversion angle (±SD) was 9.9°±5.8° (95% CI 8.4°-11.5°) with a mean percent error with respect to 15° of -34%±38 (95% CI -23 to -44). In the male subgroup (n=27, range 3.8°-22.5°), the mean retroversion angle was 11.9°±5.4° (95% CI 9.8°-14.1°) with a mean percent error with respect to 15° of -21%±36 (95% CI -6 to -35). In the female subgroup (n=27, range 0.9°-22.8°), mean retroversion angle was 8.0°±5.5° (95% CI 5.8°-10.1°) and the mean percent error with respect to 15° was -47%±36 (95% CI -32 to -61). The differences between the 2 gender groups were statistically significant (P=.006). Referencing the forearm using an extramedullary forearm referencing system to position the humeral stem in a desired retroversion is neither accurate nor precise. There is a nonnegligible tendency to achieve a lower retroversion than planned, and the error is more marked in females.

Clinical outcomes are unchanged after a mean of 12 years after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a long-term re-evaluation

BackgroundThe medium-term results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) that has been performed by a single surgeon have been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the minimum 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of these patients. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, 27 patients were evaluated after RSA for massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT) with or without eccentric osteoarthritis (OA) or concentric OA with the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), range of motion (ROM), and a radiologic assessment. ResultsAt a mean 12-year follow-up, the CMS and ROM were significantly improved when compared with the baseline values (all p<0.001). Once stratified by diagnosis, no difference in the ROM or total CMS was found between patients with MRCT with/without eccentric OA and those with concentric OA. The ROM nor CMS decreased when compared to the mid-term values of the previous study, for both the overall population and the diagnosis-stratified groups. Scapular notching was reported in 66.7% of cases that was similar to the data reported at mid-term follow-up. The calcification rate was 59.3% at the long-term evaluation, and there were no differences between the same case-series population (51.9%; p=0.785) and the whole population at mid-term follow-up (47%; p=0.358). ConclusionsRSA led to excellent clinical and functional outcomes for patients up to 17 years postoperatively, and there was no decrease in the CMS over time. No loosening of implants was noted, and the rate of scapular notching was 66%, mostly grade 1 or 2.

Effect of using a small baseplate on the radiological and clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Asian patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) using small and standard baseplates in Asian patients, and to investigate the impact of a mismatch in the sizes of the glenoid and the baseplate on the outcomes. This was retrospective analysis of 50 and 33 RSAs using a standard (33.8 mm, ST group) and a small (29.5 mm, SM group) baseplate of the Equinoxe reverse shoulder system, which were undertaken between January 2017 and March 2021. Radiological evaluations included the size of the glenoid, the β-angle, the inclination of the glenoid component, inferior overhang, scapular notching, the location of the central cage in the baseplate within the vault and the mismatch in size between the glenoid and baseplate. Clinical evaluations included the range of motion (ROM) and functional scores. In subgroup analysis, comparisons were performed between those in whom the vault of the glenoid was perforated (VP group) and those in whom it was not perforated (VNP group). Perforation of the vault of the glenoid (p = 0.018) and size mismatch in height (p < 0.001) and width (p = 0.013) were significantly more frequent in the ST group than in the SM group. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and ROM in the two groups, two years postoperatively (all p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis, the VP group had significantly less inferior overhang (p = 0.009), more scapular notching (p = 0.018), and more size mismatch in height (p < 0.001) and width (p = 0.025) than the VNP group. In Asian patients with a small glenoid, using a 29.5 mm small baseplate at the time of RSA was more effective in reducing size mismatch between the glenoid and the baseplate, decreasing the incidence of perforation of the glenoid vault, and achieving optimal positioning of the baseplate compared with the use of a 33.8 mm standard baseplate. However, longer follow-up is required to assess the impact of these findings on the clinical outcomes.

Functional and radiographic outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 10 years

The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, few studies have been published reporting the long-term outcomes of RSA. This study aims to report the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of the Delta Xtend reverse shoulder prosthesis, performed by a single surgeon and with a minimum follow-up of 10years. All RSA procedures performed between 2005 and 2012 were identified. Patients were contacted and invited for a follow-up visit including clinical assessment, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures. Patients with a follow-up of less than 10years were excluded. The revision-free implant survival was calculated at 10years. Between 2005 and 2012, 119 procedures in 116 patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Of these patients, 35 were deceased before reaching the 10-year follow-up and 23 could not be reached. In total, 63 RSAs could be included in 61 patients (response rate: 75%). The median follow-up was 11.7years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.5-13.2). Of the 61 patients, 7 patients underwent a revision after a median of 3years (IQR: 0.2-9.8) during the total follow-up period. The 10-year implant survival was 94% (95% confidence interval: 84-98). At final follow-up, the median anterior elevation was 135° (IQR: 130°-160°), the median abduction was 120° (IQR: 100°-135°), and the median level reached with internal rotation was L5 (IQR: sacrum-L5). The median Auto-Constant score was 68 (IQR: 53-78), the median Subjective Shoulder Value was 80 (IQR: 70-93), and the median pain score was 0.2/10 (IQR: 0-2). In total, radiographs could be obtained in 25 patients (40%). Scapular notching occurred in 10 patients (40%), which was classified as Sirveaux-Nerot grade IV in 3 patients (12%). Ossification occurred in 10 patients (40%), and stress shielding in 2 patients (8%). Radiolucencies were observed around the humeral component in 24 patients (96%) and around the glenoid component in 13 patients (52%). The long-term results of RSA with a Delta Xtend prosthesis are favorable, with long-term improvement in range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures, and a satisfactory implant survival rate. Interestingly, the radiographical analysis showed high prevalence of signs associated with loosening, which did not seem to translate to high complication rates or inferior results.

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study.

This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus arthroscopic supe- rior capsular reconstruction in the treatment of patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and Hamada grade 1-2 glenohumeral arthritis. It is a retrospective case-control study comparing the prospective results of 2 different treatment methods. This retrospective comparison of groups was conducted between May 2016 and May 2020. The study included 40 people with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy who had arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft or reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment. Clinical outcome measures included shoulder range of motion, pain, and functional scores (Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons). The mean age was 61.85 ± 7.56 and 71.10 ± 6.42 years, respectively, for group I [superior capsular reconstruction (n=20)] and group II [superior capsular reconstruction (n=20)]. The mean follow-up was 22.30 ± 8.4 and 32.50 ± 8.11 months, respectively. In the postoperative data, flexion degrees and Constant scores were significantly higher in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P=.007, P = .043). No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in all parameters (P > .05) except abduction. The increase in abduction value in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group was significantly higher than in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P = .003). In addition, postoperative data in all parameters in both groups showed significant changes compared to preoperatively. This study has shown that superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft can provide clinical and func- tional improvement similar to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedure in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy. Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: significantly different characteristics and outcomes in shoulders with intact vs. torn rotator cuff

To compare outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with and without rotator cuff (RC) tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears. We reviewed records of all patients who received RSA for primary OA or secondary OA. All patients had preoperative radiographs, computed tomographic arthrography (CTA), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their shoulders to assess their etiology, glenoid morphology, and fatty infiltration. Pre- and postoperative (at minimum follow-up of 2 years) Constant scores and range of motion were compared between patients who had RSA for primary OA with and without RC tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears. Of the initial cohort of 605 shoulders (583 patients), 153 were lost to follow-up (25.3%), 25 required revision with implant removal (4.1%), and 13 died of causes unrelated to the surgery (2.1%), and left a final cohort of 414 patients. Of the final cohort, 97 had primary OA with intact RC, 62 had primary OA with RC tears, and 255 had secondary OA. Postoperative Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC (73.8±14.3), compared with both primary OA with RC tears (66.1±14.6, P<.001) and secondary OA (64.1±14.8, P<.001). There were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores between primary OA with RC tears and secondary OA. At 2 or more years following RSA, Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC, compared to either primary OA with RC tears or secondary OA, whereas there were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores of shoulders that had primary OA with RC tears vs. secondary OA. The authors recommend distinguishing primary OA with intact RC from primary OA with RC tears, as the two have considerably different characteristics and prognosis following RSA.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty following failed rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an established operative treatment for failed rotator cuff repair (RCR) that may not be amenable to revision repair. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing RSA following prior failed RCR compared with patients without prior RCR undergoing primary RSA. A systematic search of articles in Pubmed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. Comparative studies assessing outcomes of RSA after failed RCR versus primary RSA were included. Seven studies with 2149 total patients were included; 760 patients had a prior RCR and 1389 patients did not have a prior RCR. Prior failed RCR resulted in significantly lower postoperative ASES scores (mean difference [MD], -8.31 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.96, -5.66), less forward flexion (MD, -6.71 95%CI -11.75, -1.67), and higher VAS pain scores (MD; 0.85, 95% CI 0.47, 1.22) when compared to primary RSA. There were no significant differences in external rotation, complications rate, or rate of revision. This study found that failed RCR prior to RSA was associated with lower functional outcomes scores, higher pain scores, and worse range of motion compared to primary RSA without prior RCR.