Outcomes Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Articles

Imaging Outcomes of MRI After CT in Pediatric Spinal Trauma: A Single-center Experience

Background: Imaging has an essential role in the diagnostic workup of suspected pediatric spinal trauma. The most suitable imaging method is still being debated and needs to be considered regarding the patient, injury, and local resources. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often performed after computed tomography (CT) in case of neurological symptoms or suspected ligamentous disruption. However, it is unclear if the MRI yields significant additional value after CT if the spinal cord injury is not suspected and if the MRI could be used as the sole imaging modality in an emergency department. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of emergency MRI after CT in suspected spinal trauma in children and adolescents. Methods: The imaging data and medical records of patients 17 years of age and younger with emergency spinal CT and MRI over 8 years were retrospectively reviewed. The primary study outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the 2 imaging modalities in detecting surgically treated spinal injuries. Results: The study population consisted of 100 patients. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated all 7 surgically treated injuries, although one of the injuries was initially missed with CT. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed more injuries, but none of the injuries visible on CT required surgical fixation. Magnetic resonance imaging was able to exclude unstable injuries in patients who had highly suspicious or unequivocal findings on CT. Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography were both highly accurate in detecting unstable pediatric spinal injuries requiring surgical treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging seems not to reveal additional unstable injuries after adequately interpreted spinal CT. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective observational study.

Imaging Outcomes of MRI After CT in Pediatric Spinal Trauma: A Single-center Experience

Background: Imaging has an essential role in the diagnostic workup of suspected pediatric spinal trauma. The most suitable imaging method is still being debated and needs to be considered regarding the patient, injury, and local resources. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often performed after computed tomography (CT) in case of neurological symptoms or suspected ligamentous disruption. However, it is unclear if the MRI yields significant additional value after CT if the spinal cord injury is not suspected and if the MRI could be used as the sole imaging modality in an emergency department. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of emergency MRI after CT in suspected spinal trauma in children and adolescents. Methods: The imaging data and medical records of patients 17 years of age and younger with emergency spinal CT and MRI over 8 years were retrospectively reviewed. The primary study outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the 2 imaging modalities in detecting surgically treated spinal injuries. Results: The study population consisted of 100 patients. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated all 7 surgically treated injuries, although one of the injuries was initially missed with CT. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed more injuries, but none of the injuries visible on CT required surgical fixation. Magnetic resonance imaging was able to exclude unstable injuries in patients who had highly suspicious or unequivocal findings on CT. Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography were both highly accurate in detecting unstable pediatric spinal injuries requiring surgical treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging seems not to reveal additional unstable injuries after adequately interpreted spinal CT. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective observational study.

Imaging Outcomes of Emergency MRI in Patients with Suspected Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare neurological emergency condition with non-specific symptoms. Imaging options to rule out CVST are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to determine the imaging outcomes of emergency MRI as a first-line imaging method in patients with suspected CVST. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed emergency brain MRI referrals from a five-year period in a tertiary hospital for suspicion of CVST. We recorded patient characteristics, risk factors mentioned in the referrals, and imaging outcomes. Altogether 327 patients underwent emergency MRI on the grounds of suspected CVST. MRI showed evidence of CVST among five patients (1.5%). Imaging showed other clinically significant pathology in 15% of the patients and incidental findings in 5% of the patients. Despite clinical suspicion, the diagnostic yield of emergency MRI for CVST is low and similar to that previously reported for CT. MRI is an alternative imaging method devoid of ionizing radiation in patients with suspected CVST.

Effects of preoperative magnetic resonance image on survival rates and surgical planning in breast cancer conservative surgery: randomized controlled trial (BREAST-MRI trial)

BackgroundBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity in detecting invasive neoplasms. Controversy remains about its impact on the preoperative staging of breast cancer surgery. This study evaluated survival and surgical outcomes of preoperative MRI in conservative breast cancer surgery.MethodsA phase III, randomized, open-label, single-center trial including female breast cancer participants, stage 0–III disease, and eligible for breast-conserving surgery. We compared the role of including MRI in preoperative evaluation versus radiologic exam routine with mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer conservative candidates. The primary outcome was local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), mastectomy rate, and reoperation rate.Results524 were randomized to preoperative MRI group (n = 257) or control group (n = 267). The survival analysis showed a 5.9-years LRFS of 99.2% in MRI group versus 98.9% in control group (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.12—4.28; p = 0.7) and an OS of 95.3% in the MRI group versus 96.3% in the control group (HR = 1.37 95% CI 0.59–3.19; p = 0.8). Surgical management changed in 21 ipsilateral breasts in the MRI group; 21 (8.3%) had mastectomies versus one in the control group. No difference was found in reoperation rates, 22 (8.7%) in the MRI group versus 23 (8.7%) in the control group (RR = 1.002; 95% CI 0.57–1.75; p = 0.85).ConclusionPreoperative MRI increased the mastectomy rates by 8%. The use of preoperative MRI did not influence local relapse-free survival, overall survival, or reoperation rates.

Can ‘SOVAC’- a set of brain magnetic resonance imaging findings- detect idiopathic intracranial hypertension?

Objective
 To determine diagnostic ability of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
 Method
 This descriptive observational study was conducted in radiology department from Jan. 2018 to Jan. 2021, evaluating MR imaging data of all adult patients (n=107) with clinical presentations of headaches. Patients with space occupying lesions, obstructive hydrocephalus and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis were excluded. Presence of all three brain MRI findings of (i) an empty sella (with or without sellar enlargement), (ii) tortuosity of optic nerves (with or without perioptic CSF prominence) and (iii) non-dilated (or slit-like) ventricles was considered positive for IIH. Imaging was reviewed by two neuroradiologists and consensus reporting was made. Findings of IIH were confirmed by presence of high lumbar opening cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure or symptomatic response towards specific medical treatment. Outcomes of brain MRIs were presented on a 2x2 contingency table.
 Results
 Sensitivity, and specificity of routine brain MRI findings in detection of IIH were calculated as 76.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 64.62-85.91%], and 84.6% (95% CI, 69.47-94.14%) respectively. 
 Conclusion:
 IIH is a known cause of headache. Detection of all three findings of empty sella, tortuosity of optic nerves and non-dilated ventricles on routine brain MRI can predict IIH with greater sensitivity and specificity.

Geographic Variability, Time Trends and Association of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Surgical Outcomes for Elderly United States Men with Prostate Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Analysis.

Our goal was to assess patterns of adoption and population-level outcomes of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and association with surgical outcomes across a sample of U.S. elderly. This population-based retrospective study used Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data from 2003-2016 to identify men receiving prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We characterized the proportion of men receiving preoperative MRI in each year and in each hospital referral region (HRR). A 2-stage instrumental variable analysis was performed to assess the association of preoperative MRI with margin status, surgical complications and further cancer-directed therapies. A total of 19,369 men received prostatectomy in 72 HRRs; the mean age was 70.2 years (SD 3.2). The proportion of men receiving a preoperative MRI increased from 2.9% to 28.2% over the study period and ranged from 0.0% to 28.8% in the different HRRs. In our instrumental variable analysis, preoperative MRI was associated with lower odds of positive surgical margin (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97, p=0.01) lower odds of blood transfusions at 30 and 90 days (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83, p=0.003 and OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.84, p=0.004) but higher odds of further treatments (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.32-1.70, p <0.001). Given that a minority of men receive presurgical MRIs with marked geographic variability, the association of MRI with lower odds of positive surgical margin suggests that efforts to support the dissemination of prostate MRI may improve surgical outcomes-but may come with a tendency for more resource-intensive cancer care overall.

Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Review.

Despite the high sensitivity and widespread use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the American Cancer Society and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not recommend the routine use of preoperative MRI owing to the conflicting results and lack of clear benefit to the surgical outcome (reoperation and mastectomy) and long-term clinical outcomes (local recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer). Preoperative MRI detects additional cancers that are occult at mammography and ultrasound but increases the rate of mastectomy. Concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of preoperative MRI might be mitigated by adjusting the confounding factors when conducting studies, using the state-of-the-art image-guided biopsy technique, applying the radiologists’ cumulative experiences in interpreting MRI findings, and performing multiple lumpectomies in patients with multicentric cancer. Among the various imaging methods, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI has the highest accuracy in predicting pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective trials aimed at applying the MRI information to the de-escalation of surgical or radiation treatments are underway. In this review, current studies on the clinical outcomes of preoperative breast MRI are updated, and circumstances in which MRI may be useful for surgical planning are discussed.

SC269 - Outcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients managed with Active Surveillance for prostate cancer

SC269 - Outcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients managed with Active Surveillance for prostate cancer

Clinical implementation of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging pathways for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

ObjectiveTo assess the outcomes of pre‐biopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pathways, as a tool in biopsy‐naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer, in routine clinical practice. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of transrectal MRI‐directed biopsy (TR‐MRDB) and transperineal (TP)‐MRDB in men with suspicious MRI.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively assessed a two‐centre cohort of consecutive biopsy‐naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent a Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI‐RADS v2) compliant pre‐biopsy MRI in a single, high‐volume centre between 2015 and 2019 (Centre 1). Men with suspicious MRI scans underwent TR‐MRDB in Centre 1 and TP‐MRDB with additional random biopsies (RB) in Centre 2. The MRI and histopathology were assessed in the same institution (Centre 1). Outcomes included: (i) overall detection rates of Grade Group (GG) 1, GG ≥2, and GG ≥3 cancer in men with suspicious MRI; (ii) Biopsy‐avoidance due to non‐suspicious MRI; and (iii) Cancer detection rates and biopsy‐related complications between TR‐ and TP‐MRDB. To reduce confounding bias for MRDB comparisons, inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed for age, digital rectal examination, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, and PI‐RADS category.ResultsOf the 2597 men included, the overall GG 1, GG ≥2, and GG ≥3 prevalence was 8% (210/2597), 27% (697/2597), and 15% (396/2597), respectively. Biopsy was avoided in 57% (1488/2597) of men. After IPW, the GG 1, GG ≥2 and GG ≥3 detection rates after TR‐ and TP‐MRDB were comparable at 24%, 57%, and 32%; and 18%, 64%, and 38%, respectively; with mean differences of −5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] −13% to 1.4%), 6.1% (95% CI −2.1% to 14%), and 5.7% (95% CI −1.7% to 13%). Complications were similar in TR‐MRDB (0.50%) and TP‐MRDB with RB (0.62%; mean difference 0.11%, 95% CI −0.87% to 1.1%).ConclusionThis high‐volume, two‐centre study shows pre‐biopsy MRI as a decision tool is implementable in daily clinical practice. Compared to recent trials, a substantially higher biopsy avoidance rate was achieved without compromising GG ≥2/GG ≥3 detection and coinciding with lower over detection rates of GG 1 cancer. Prostate cancer detection and complication rates were comparable for TR‐ and TP‐MRDB.

Magnetic resonance imaging /ultrasonography fusion transperineal prostate biopsy for prostate cancer: Initial experience at a Middle Eastern tertiary medical centre

ABSTRACT Objective: To report on the outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasonography (US)-fusion transperineal prostate (TP) biopsy at a tertiary medical centre in the Middle East including detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), complications, and tolerability of the procedure. Patients and methods: Between May 2019 and June 2020, 98 MRI/US-fusion TP biopsies were performed in the US suite using light sedation. All patients had pre-biopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI. Data on patient characteristics, PCa detection rate and complication rates were collected retrospectively. A Gleason score ≥3 + 4 was defined as csPCa. Results There were 98 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 65 (9.1) years, and a median (SD) prostate-specific antigen level prior to biopsy of 7.53 (12.97) ng/mL and prostate volume of 51 (31.1) mL. PCa was detected in 54 (55%) patients, with csPCa detected in 43 (44%). A total of 124 Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3–5 lesions were targeted. Grade Group ≥2 PCa was found in 35.5% of the targeted lesions. Random biopsies detected one csPCa Gleason score 3 + 4 in one patient with a negative target. None of the patients had post-biopsy haematuria or retention. Only one patient developed acute prostatitis requiring in-patient intravenous antibiotics. Conclusions MRI/US-fusion TP biopsy has an adequate detection rate of csPCa with minimal complications and low infection rates after biopsy. This is one of the first TP biopsy series in the Middle East paving the way for wider adoption in the region. Abbreviations AS: active surveillance; AUR: acute urinary retention; GG: Grade Group; IQR: interquartile range; mpMRI: multiparametric MRI; (cs)PCa: (clinically significant) prostate cancer; PI-RADS: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; TP: transperineal; US: ultrasonography; TRUS: transrectal Ultrasound guided.

Outcomes of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in people living with HIV

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background/Introduction People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, PLWH) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). HIV infection and accelerated traditional risk factors due to highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) are proposed mechanisms for increased rate of heart failure (HF). The pathophysiological drivers of myocardial dysfunction and worse cardiovascular outcome in HIV remain poorly understood. Purpose To examine prognostic relationships of cardiac imaging measures with cardiovascular outcome in PLWH on HAART. Methods This is a prospective observational longitudinal study using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in consecutive PLHWH on long-term HAART who were screened for underlying CVD and followed up clinically for adjudicated adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome, an appropriate device discharge, or a documented HF hospitalization). Imaging protocol included routine assessment of cardiac volumes and function, scar by late gadolinium enhancement, myocardial perfusion and native T1 /T2 mapping. Time-to-event analysis was performed from the index CMR exam to the first single event per patient Systematic risk scores for CVD (Framingham risk score (FRS), Data Collection on Adverse effects of anti-HIV Drugs score, D:A:D and MAGGIC integer score) were calculated using original online calculators. Results 156 participants (males 62%, 50 [42-57] years of age) were included. 24 events were observed (4 HF deaths, 1 sudden cardiac death, 2 non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, 1 appropriate device discharge and 16 HF hospitalizations) during a median follow-up of 13 [9-19] months. Patients with events had higher native T1 (ms, 1149 [1115-1163] ms vs. 1110 [1075-1138] ms), native T2 (ms, 40 [38-41] vs. 37 [36-39]), LV mass index (g/m², 65 [49-77] vs. 57 [49-64]) p &amp;lt; 0.05 for all). In multivariable analyses, native T1 was independently predictive of adverse events (ChiSq 15.9, p &amp;lt; 0.001, native T1 (10 ms) hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.20 (1.08-1.33), p = 0.001), followed by a model that also included LV mass (ChiSq 17.1, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Traditional cardiovascular risk scores were not predictive of the adverse events. Conclusions Native myocardial T1 and LV mass by CMR, as opposed to traditional cardiovascular risk scores, predict cardiovascular outcome in PLWH, together reflecting the pathological myocardial remodeling of myocardial fibrosis and inflammation that potentially explain higher rates of HF in PLWH as compared to the non-infected population. These findings may inform personalized approaches to screening and early intervention to reduce the burden of HF.

P1043 - Outcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients managed with active surveillance for prostate cancer

P1043 - Outcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients managed with active surveillance for prostate cancer

Reply by Authors.

Reply by Authors.

Salvage Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Localized Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: 12-Month Functional and Oncological Results

BackgroundUp to half of all men who undergo primary radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) experience local recurrence. ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and early functional and oncological outcomes of salvage magnetic resonance imaging–guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (sTULSA) for men with localized radiorecurrent PCa. Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective, single-center phase 1 study (NCT03350529) enrolled men with biopsy-proven localized PCa recurrence after radiotherapy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and 18F prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 (18F PSMA-1007) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) were used to confirm organ-confined disease localization. Patients underwent either whole-gland or partial sTULSA, depending on their individual tumor characteristics. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisPatients were followed at 3-mo intervals. Adverse events (AEs, Clavien-Dindo scale), functional status questionnaires (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index [EPIC]-26, International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function-5), uroflowmetry, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were assessed at every visit. Disease control was assessed at 1 yr using mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT, followed by prostate biopsies. Results and limitationsEleven patients (median age 69 yr, interquartile range [IQR] 68–74) underwent sTULSA (3 whole-gland, 8 partial sTULSA) and have completed 12-mo follow-up. Median PSA was 7.6ng/ml (IQR 4.9–10) and the median time from initial PCa diagnosis to sTULSA was 11 yr (IQR 9.5–13). One grade 3 and three grade 2 AEs were reported, related to urinary retention and infection. Patients reported a modest degradation in functional status, most significantly a 20% decline in the EPIC-26 irritative/obstructive domain at 12 mo. A decline in maximum flow rate (24%) was also observed. At 1 yr, 10/11 patients were free of any PCa in the targeted ablation zone, with two out-of-field recurrences. Limitations include the nonrandomized design, limited sample size, and short-term oncological outcomes. ConclusionssTULSA appears to be safe and feasible for ablation of radiorecurrent PCa, offering encouraging preliminary oncological control. Patient summaryWe present safety and 1-yr functional and oncological outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging–guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a salvage treatment for local prostate cancer recurrence after primary radiation. Salvage TULSA is safe and shows the ability to effectively ablate prostate cancer recurrence, with acceptable toxicity.

Abstract 12916: Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Pacemakers/ICDs and Fractured or Abandoned Leads

Introduction: Current guidelines exclude patients with fractured or abandoned leads from MRI scanning due to possible safety concerns. In vitro, the configuration of fractured or abandoned leads impacts lead tip heating during MRI. This study examined the clinical impact of lead length, lead location, and lead shape on patient outcomes in patients with pacemakers/ICDs and fractured or abandoned leads undergoing MRI. Methods: Single center retrospective review of patients with pacemakers/ICDs and fractured or abandoned leads undergoing clinically indicated MRI from 7/2016 through 3/2020. Results: 58 patients with 68 abandoned/fractured leads underwent 112 MRI scans at 1.5T. The average age was 71.8 +/- 13.7 years with 22 (37%) female. Average MRI duration was 32.6 +/- 17 min. There were no significant changes in function of the intact leads or generator battery life after MRI. 58 leads were abandoned and 10 leads were fractured, including 52 pacemaker leads, 12 ICD leads, and 4 epicardial leads. Patients with abandoned leads had significantly longer lead length compared to those with fractured leads (58cm vs 6.8cm, p&lt;0.01), more often had a "c" shape lead configuration on chest xray (p&lt;0.01), and were more likely to terminate in the right ventricle (p&lt;0.01). Patients with fractured leads more often had a vertical (p&lt;0.01), horizontal (p&lt;0.01), or "r" shaped (p=0.05) configuration on chest xray, and lead fragments more often terminated in the left chest wall (p&lt;0.01). There were no adverse clinical events during MRI in any patient. Conclusions: In this study of patients with 68 abandoned/fractured leads undergoing 112 MRIs, neither lead length, lead location, nor lead shape was associated with adverse outcomes. In vitro studies suggesting that the configuration of abandoned/fractured leads can cause patient harm during MRI does not translate to clinical events. Future studies should further assess the safety of MRI scanning in patients with abandoned/fractured leads.

The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early-stage breast cancer survivors-An institutional experience and literature review.

The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the screening of breast cancer survivors with remaining breast tissue is not well studied. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of screening breast MRI in a cohort of breast cancer survivors. A population of patients with history of stage I-IIIa breast cancer and ≥1 MRI a year or later from diagnosis between 2006-2008 were identified using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network data base from two large Boston-area cancer centers. Patient and disease characteristics were obtained from the data base, and medical records were reviewed to identify the index MRI (first eligible), indications, and two-year outcomes. Overall, 647 patients had breast MRI scans during the study period including 342 eligible patients whose index MRIs were done for breast screening purposes. 47/342 (13.7%) were abnormal, and 3.8% (13/342) underwent biopsy, resulting in the detection of 3 cases of locoregional recurrence or new primary breast cancer (0.9%, 95% CI=0.2%-2.5%). Of 295 patients with a normal index screening MRI, 12 had a breast cancer recurrence diagnosed within 2years (4.1% 95%CI=2.1%-7.0%), and 5 of these recurrences were limited to MRI-screened breast tissue. No statistically significant difference in the rate of 2-year locoregional or distant recurrence was observed between patients with an abnormal screening MRI and those with a normal scan. Adjunct single breast MRI surveillance in a general population of breast cancer survivors one year after diagnosis detected few recurrences, and its effect on short-term outcomes was unclear.

Transperineal freehand multiparametric MRI fusion targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicentre prospective study of 1014 cases.

To assess the outcomes of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) transperineal targeted fusion biopsy (TPFBx) under local anaesthesia. We prospectively screened 1327 patients with a positive mpMRI undergoing TPFBx (targeted cores and systematic cores) under local anaesthesia, at two tertiary referral institutions, between September 2016 and May 2019, for inclusion in the present study. Primary outcomes were detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as (1) International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade >1 or ISUP grade 1 with >50% involvement of prostate cancer (PCa) in a single core or in >2 cores (D1) and (2) ISUP grade >1 PCa (D2). Secondary outcomes were: assessment of peri-procedural pain (numerical rating scale [NRS]) and procedure timings; erectile (International Index of Erectile Function) and urinary (International Prostate Symptom Score) function changes; and complications. We also investigated the value of systematic sampling and concordance with radical prostatectomy (RP). A total of 1014 patients were included, of whom csPCa was diagnosed in 39.4% (n = 400). The procedure was tolerable (NRS pain score 3.1 ± 2.3), with no impact on erectile (P=0.45) or urinary (P = 0.58) function, and a low rate of complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 or 2, n = 8; grade >2, n = 0). No post-biopsy sepsis was recorded. Twenty-two men (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-29) needed to undergo additional systematic biopsy to diagnose one csPCa missed by targeted biopsies (D1). ISUP grade concordance of biopsies with RP was as follows: k = 0.40 (95% CI 0.31-0.49) for targeted cores alone and k = 0.65 (95% CI 0.57-0.72; P < 0.05) overall. The use of TPFBx under local anaesthesia yielded good csPCa detection and was feasible, quick, well tolerated and safe. Infectious risk was negligible. Addition of systematic to targeted cores may not be needed in all men, although it improves csPCa detection and concordance with RP.

Five-year Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–based Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Large Cohort Study

BackgroundAlthough the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer is of increasing interest, existing data are derived from small cohorts. ObjectiveWe describe clinical, histological, and radiological outcomes from an established AS programme, where protocol-based biopsies were omitted in favour of MRI-led monitoring. Design, setting, and participantsData on 672 men enrolled in AS between August 2004 and November 2017 (inclusion criteria: Gleason 3 + 3 or 3 + 4 localised prostate cancer, presenting prostate-specific antigen <20 ng/ml, and baseline mpMRI) were collected from the University College London Hospital (UCLH) database. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisPrimary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS; event defined as prostate cancer treatment, transition to watchful waiting, or death) and treatment-free survival (TFS). Secondary outcomes included rates of all-cause or prostate cancer–related mortality, metastasis, and upgrading to Gleason ≥4 + 3. Data on radiological and histological progression were also collected. Results and limitationsMore than 3800 person-years (py) of follow-up were accrued (median: 58 mo; interquartile range 37–82 mo). Approximately 84.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.0–87.6) and 71.8% (95% CI: 68.2–75.6) of patients remained on AS at 3 and 5 yr, respectively. EFS and TFS were lower in those with MRI-visible (Likert 4–5) disease or secondary Gleason pattern 4 at baseline (log-rank test; p < 0.001). In total, 216 men were treated. There were 24 deaths, none of which was prostate cancer related (6.3/1000 py; 95% CI: 4.1–9.5). Metastases developed in eight men (2.1 events/1000 py; 95% CI: 1.0–4.3), whereas 27 men upgraded to Gleason ≥4 + 3 on follow-up biopsy (7.7 events/1000 py; 95% CI: 5.2–11.3). ConclusionsThe rates of discontinuation, mortality, and metastasis in MRI-led surveillance are comparable with those of standard AS. MRI-visible disease and/or secondary Gleason grade 4 at baseline are associated with a greater likelihood of moving to active treatment at 5 yr. Further research will concentrate on optimising imaging intervals according to baseline risk. Patient summaryIn this report, we looked at the outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based surveillance for prostate cancer in a UK cohort. We found that this strategy could allow routine biopsies to be avoided. Secondary Gleason pattern 4 and MRI visibility are associated with increased rates of treatment. We conclude that MRI-based surveillance should be considered for the monitoring of small prostate tumours.

Role of Breast MRI in the Evaluation and Detection of DCIS: Opportunities and Challenges.

Historically, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not considered an effective modality in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Over the past decade this has changed, with studies demonstrating that MRI is the most sensitive imaging tool for detection of all grades of DCIS. It has been suggested that not only is breast MRI the most sensitive imaging tool for detection but it may also detect the most clinically relevant DCIS lesions. The role and outcomes of MRI in the preoperative setting for patients with DCIS remains controversial; however, several studies have shown benefit in the preoperative evaluation of extent of disease as well as predicting an underlying invasive component. The most common presentation of DCIS on MRI is nonmass enhancement (NME) in a linear or segmental distribution pattern. Maximizing breast MRI spatial resolution is therefore beneficial, given the frequent presentation of DCIS as NME on MRI. Emerging MRI techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), have shown promising potential to discriminate DCIS from benign and invasive lesions. Future opportunities including advanced imaging visual techniques, radiomics/radiogenomics, and machine learning / artificial intelligence may also be applicable to the detection and treatment of DCIS. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:697-709.

Outcomes of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Subsequent Biopsy in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance

BackgroundOutcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and subsequent biopsy in monitoring prostate cancer (PCa) in men on active surveillance (AS) have not been defined clearly. ObjectiveTo determine whether changes in serial mpMRI can predict pathological upgrade among men with grade group (GG) 1 PCa managed with AS. Design, setting, and participantsRetrospective analysis of men with GG1 on AS with at least two consecutive mpMRI examinations during 2012–2018 who underwent mpMRI/ultrasound fusion or systematic biopsies. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisProgression on serial mpMRI was evaluated as a predictor of pathological upgrading to GG≥2 on a follow-up biopsy using clinical, pathological, and imaging factors in binary logistic regression. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were determined. Results and limitationsOf 122 patients, 29 men (23.8%) experienced pathological upgrade on the follow-up biopsy. Progression on mpMRI was not associated with pathological upgrade. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mpMRI progression for predicting pathological upgrade were 41.3%, 54.8%, 22.2%, and 75%, respectively. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, p=0.006), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score on initial mpMRI (4–5 vs ≤3, OR 7.48, p=0.01), number of positive systematic cores (OR 1.84, p=0.03), number of positive targeted cores (OR 0.44, p=0.04), and maximum percent of targeted core tumor involvement (OR 1.04, p=0.01) were significantly associated with pathological upgrade. ConclusionsWe did not observe an association between mpMRI progression and pathological upgrade; however, a PI-RADS score of 4–5 on initial mpMRI was predictive of subsequent pathological progression. The continued use of systematic and fusion biopsies appears necessary due to risks of reclassification over time. Patient summaryProgression on serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging during active surveillance (AS) is not associated with progression on the follow-up biopsy. Both systematic and fusion biopsies are necessary to sufficiently capture progression during AS.