Outcomes Of Dexamethasone Research Articles

Use and Outcomes of Dexamethasone in the Management of Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction.

To describe rates of dexamethasone use in the nonoperative management of malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) and their outcomes. mSBO is common in patients with advanced abdominal-pelvic cancers. Management includes prioritizing quality of life and avoiding surgical intervention when possible. The use of dexamethasone to restore bowel function is recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for mSBO. Yet, it is unknown how often dexamethasone is used for mSBO and whether results from nonresearch settings support its use. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study including unique admissions for mSBO from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Dexamethasone use and management outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression. Among 571 admissions (68% female, mean age 63 years, 85% history of abdominal surgery) that were eligible and initially nonoperative, 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23%-30%] received dexamethasone treatment (69% female, mean age 62 years, 87% history of abdominal surgery). Dexamethasone use by site ranged from 13% to 52%. Among dexamethasone recipients, 13% (95% CI = 9%-20%) subsequently required nonelective surgery during the same admission and 4 dexamethasone-related safety-events were reported. Amongst 421 eligible admissions where dexamethasone was not used, 17% (95% CI = 14%-21%) required nonelective surgery. Overall, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for nonelective surgery with dexamethasone use compared to without its use was 0.7 (95% CI = 0.4-1.3). Using multiple logistic regression, OR after adjusting for site, age, sex, history of abdominal surgery, nasogastric tube, and Gastrografin use was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3-1.1). Dexamethasone was used in about 1 in 4 eligible mSBO admissions with high variability of use between tertiary academic centers. This multicenter retrospective cohort study suggested an association between dexamethasone use and lower rates of nonelective surgery, representing a potential opportunity for quality improvement.

Impact of prior treatment on selinexor, bortezomib, dexamethasone outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended follow-up subgroup analysis of the BOSTON trial.

To analyze the impact of prior therapies on outcomes with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (SVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in 402 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the phase 3 BOSTON trial. Post hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, and one prior line of therapy (1LOT) patient subgroups. At a median follow-up of over 28 months, clinically meaningful improvements in PFS were noted across all groups with SVd. The median SVd PFS was longer in all subgroups (lenalidomide-refractory: 10.2 vs. 7.1 months, PI-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; bortezomib-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; 1LOT: 21.0 vs. 10.7; p < .05). The lenalidomide-refractory subgroup had longer OS with SVd (26.7 vs. 18.6 months; HR 0.53; p = .015). In all subgroups, overall response and ≥very good partial response rates were higher with SVd. The manageable safety profile of SVd was similar to the overall patient population. With over 2 years of follow-up, these clinically meaningful outcomes further support the use of SVd in patients who are lenalidomide-refractory, PI-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, or who received 1LOT (including a monoclonal antibody) and underscore the observed synergy between selinexor and bortezomib.

Dexamethasone in Patients with Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Glioblastomas are the most common primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Although modern management strategies have modestly improved overall survival, the prognosis remains dismal, with treatment side effects often impinging on the clinical course. Glioblastomas cause neurological dysfunction by infiltrating CNS tissue and via perifocal oedema formation. The administration of steroids such as dexamethasone is thought to alleviate symptoms by reducing oedema. However, despite its widespread use, the evidence for the administration of dexamethasone is limited and conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to review the current evidence concerning the use and outcomes of dexamethasone in patients with glioblastoma. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA-P guidelines. We performed a restricted search using the keywords "Dexamethasone" and "Glioblastoma" on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Academic Search Premier. We included studies reporting on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma patients receiving higher or lower dexamethasone doses. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model for OS and PFS. Twenty-two retrospective studies were included. Higher doses of dexamethasone were associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio 1.62, confidence interval 1.40-1.88) and PFS (1.49, 1.23-1.81). OS remained worse even when studies corrected for clinical status (1.52, 1.38-1.67). Despite the widespread use of dexamethasone in glioblastoma patients, its use is correlated with worse long-term outcomes. Consequently, Dexamethasone administration should be restricted to selected symptomatic patients. Future prospective studies are crucial to confirm these findings.

Outcomes of dexamethasone implant treatment in patients with diabetic macula edema anatomically unresponsive to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment: early switch to dexamethasone study

Outcomes of dexamethasone implant treatment in patients with diabetic macula edema anatomically unresponsive to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment: early switch to dexamethasone study

Dexamethasone Does Not Inhibit Treadmill Training-Induced Angiogenesis in Myocardium: Role of MicroRNA-126 Pathway.

Dexamethasone (DEX) has important anti-inflammatory activities; however, it induces hypertension and skeletal muscle microcirculation rarefaction. Nevertheless, nothing is known about DEX outcomes on cardiac microcirculation. By contrast, exercise training prevents skeletal and cardiac microvessel loss because of microRNA expression and a better balance between their related angiogenic and apoptotic proteins in spontaneously hypertensive rats. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether DEX and/or exercise training could induce microRNA alterations leading to cardiac angiogenesis or microvascular rarefaction. Animals performed 8 weeks of exercise training and were treated with DEX (50 μg/kg per day, subcutaneously) for 14 days. Cardiovascular parameters were measured, and the left ventricle muscle was collected for analyses. DEX treatment increased arterial pressure and did not cause cardiac microcirculation rarefaction. Treadmill training prevented the DEX-induced increase in arterial pressure. In addition, training, regardless of DEX treatment, increased microRNA-126 expression, phospho-protein kinase B/protein kinase B, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase levels associated with cardiac angiogenesis. In conclusion, this study suggests, for the first time, that treadmill training induces myocardial angiogenesis because of angiogenic pathway improvement associated with an increase in microRNA-126. Furthermore, DEX, per se, did not cause capillary density alterations and did not attenuate cardiac angiogenesis induced by training.

Glucocorticoid-mediated anti-inflammatory effect through NFκB is preserved in the absence of Dexras1

ABSTRACTGlucocorticoids effectively mediate the resolution of inflammation, but long-term use of glucocorticoids inevitably causes metabolic side effects. However, it is unknown if metabolic effectors such as Dexras1, a dexamethasone-stimulated protein, play a role in the anti-inflammatory outcome of dexamethasone. Here, we demonstrate that Dexras1 is required for the dexamethasone-induced upregulation of annexin A1 expression, but is not involved in the reduction of inflammation as evidenced by decreased pro-inflammatory parameters. In the absence of Dexras1, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced interleukin-6 expression was suppressed when murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells were treated with dexamethasone. Similar observations were made in the blood of Dexras1 knockout mice. Furthermore, dexamethasone suppressed the LPS-stimulated increase of NFκB-p65 in both control and Dexras1-absent RAW264.7 cells. Interestingly, depletion of Dexras1 resulted in the loss of pERK production. These results suggest that Dexras1 is involved primarily in the metabolic side effects and its inhibition preserves the anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids. Thus, the inhibition of Dexras1 will be an excellent target for reducing steroid-induced side effects.