Results Of Decompression Research Articles

Effect on Osteogenic Differentiation of Genetically Modified IL4 or PDGF-BB Over-Expressing and IL4-PDGF-BB Co-Over-Expressing Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells In Vitro.

The use of genetically modified (GM) mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and preconditioned MSCs (pMSCs) may provide further opportunities to improve the outcome of core decompression (CD) for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). GM interleukin-4 (IL4) over-expressing MSCs (IL4-MSCs), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB over-expressing MSCs (PDGF-BB-MSCs), and IL4-PDGF-BB co-over-expressing MSCs (IL4-PDGF-BB-MSCs) and their respective pMSCs were used in this in vitro study and compared with respect to cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. IL4-MSCs, PDGF-BB-MSCs, IL4-PDGF-BB-MSCs, and each pMSC treatment significantly increased cell proliferation compared to the MSC group alone. The percentage of Alizarin red-stained area in the IL4-MSC and IL4-pMSC groups was significantly lower than in the MSC group. However, the percentage of Alizarin red-stained area in the PDGF-BB-MSC group was significantly higher than in the MSC and PDGF-BB-pMSC groups. The percentage of Alizarin red-stained area in the IL4-PDGF-BB-pMSC was significantly higher than in the IL4-PDGF-BB-MSC group. There were no significant differences in the percentage of Alizarin red-stained area between the MSC and IL4-PDGF-BB-pMSC groups. The use of PDGF-BB-MSCs or IL4-PDGF-BB-pMSCs increased cell proliferation. Furthermore, PDGF-BB-MSCs promoted osteogenic differentiation. The addition of GM MSCs may provide a useful supplementary cell-based therapy to CD for treatment of ONFH.

Influence of Intervertebral Level of Stenosis on Neurological Recovery and Reduction of Neck Pain After Posterior Decompression Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study with Propensity Scoring.

Retrospective multicenter study. To identify the impact of the intervertebral level of stenosis on surgical outcomes of posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). As the upper affected cervical levels in elderly patients result from degenerative changes in the lower cervical levels with aging, it is usually difficult to determine the influence of the upper affected cervical levels on surgical outcomes after posterior decompression for CSM in older age. This study involved 636 patients with CSM who underwent posterior decompression. According to the most stenotic intervertebral level, patients were divided into upper (n = 343, the most stenotic intervertebral level was C2/3, C3/4, or C4/5) and lower (n = 293, the most stenotic intervertebral level was C5/6, C6/7, or C7/T1) cervical stenosis groups. Propensity score matching of the baseline factors (characteristics, comorbidities, and neurological function) was performed to compare surgical outcomes, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain between the upper (n = 135) and lower (n = 135) cervical stenosis groups. Before propensity score matching, age at surgery was older and pre- and postoperative JOA scores were lower in the upper cervical stenosis group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Following matching, baseline factors were comparable between the groups. Postoperative JOA scores, preoperative-to-postoperative changes in the JOA scores, and the JOA score recovery rate were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.866, P = 0.825, and P = 0.753, respectively). No differences existed in postoperative VAS for neck pain and preoperative-to-postoperative changes in VAS for neck pain between the groups (P = 0.092 and P = 0.242, respectively). The intervertebral level of stenosis did not affect surgical outcomes after posterior decompression for CSM.Level of Evidence: 3.

Outcomes of Microvascular Decompression in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralagia

Objective: To determine the treatment outcomes of microvascular decompression in patients with trigeminal neuralagia. Study Design: Prospective/Observational Place and Duration: The study was conducted at Neurosurgery department Bacha Khan Medical College/ Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan and Al Nafees Medical College, Islamabad for duration of six months i.e from July 2020 December 2020. Methods: Thirty four patients of both genders presented with trigeminal neuralagia were enrolled in this study. Patient’s detailed demographics were recorded after taking written consent. All patients underwent microvascular decompression. Outcomes were assessed by using Borrow Neurological Institute Pain score (BNIP). Follow-up was taken at 5th post-operative day. Data was analyzed by SPSS 24.0. Results: Mean age of patients was 54.26±9.78 years. There were 20 (58.82%) were females while 14 (41.17%) were males. Postoperatively 17 (50%) patients had BNIP score 1-2 with no medication required, 12 (35.29%) patients had partial recovery with BNIP score 3 and 5 (14.71%) patients showed no recovery with BNIP score 4. Conclusion: Microvascular decompression is safe and effective treatment procedure for trigeminal neuralagia with fewer rate of complications. Keywords: Trigeminal Neuralagia, Microvascular Decompression (MVD), Effectiveness

Core Decompression and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in the Treatment of Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Can We Improve Natural History?

Femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) affects between 10% and 41% of children with sickle cell disease (SCD), resulting in the development of proximal femoral deformity and residual hip pain in the majority of patients without treatment. There have been multiple adult studies published on the outcomes of core decompression with and without the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injection both in idiopathic and SCD-related AVN with promising results, however, few studies have reported on outcomes in skeletally immature patients. This study sought to report on a single surgeon's outcomes for core decompression with BMAC injection in pediatric patients with AVN of the femoral head secondary to underlying SCD. A single-center, retrospective review was performed for pediatric patients undergoing core decompression with BMAC injection for femoral head AVN in patients with SCD with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. Demographic, radiographic, and clinical variable were collected. Patients were subdivided based upon presence of open femoral physes at the time of surgery. Successful treatment was defined as the ability to return to activities without limitations. A total of 13 patients (average age 14.1±2.8 y, 84.6% male, 6 skeletally immature and 7 skeletally mature) with 18 affected extremities were identified. Open physes were present in 50% of operative extremities. Skeletally immature patient demonstrated reconstitution of the femoral head in 78% of cases and 89% demonstrated regression of at least 1 Steinberg grade and none had progression. Skeletally immature patients were significantly more likely to return to activities (100% vs. 55.6%, P=0.023) and achieve a final Tonnis grade <2 (89% vs. 44%, P=0.046). Core decompression appears to alter the natural history of AVN in skeletally immature patients with SCD. Skeletal immaturity was a positive prognostic factor for the ability to return to activities without pain and achieve a lower Tonnis grade at final follow-up.

The Top 100 Cited Articles in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Background The number of articles of clinical and basic research for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is increasing, yet, to our knowledge, there is still a lack of bibliometric analysis on ONFH articles. The purpose of this study was to identify the top 100 cited (T100) articles related to ONFH research and to analyze the characteristics and qualities of these articles. Methods The T100 articles on ONFH were retrieved from the Web of Science database. The information about each article including citations, titles, authors, journals, countries, institutions, and keywords was recorded for bibliometric analysis. Results The T100 articles related to ONFH were mainly published from 1991 to 2010 (n = 70) and were originated from 24 countries. The USA, China, and Japan were the most productive countries in this regard. The most prolific institution was the University of Pennsylvania from the USA with 6 publications and 742 citations. The most cited article was published in 1995 by Professor Steinberg ME. The five most frequently occurring keywords were “femoral head,” “osteonecrosis,” “core decompression,” “total hip arthroplasty,” and “follow up.” The keywords like “bone tissue engineering” and “extracorporeal shock wave” have emerged in recent years. Conclusions The USA, China, and Japan contributed greatly in terms of the T100 articles. The outcomes of core decompression and total hip arthroplasty gathered the most research interests. In recent years, bone tissue engineering and extracorporeal shock wave have become new trends. However, the mechanism of ONFH is still unclear.

Contemporary Outcomes of Supraclavicular Decompression for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

The optimal approach to decompression in patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is controversial due to a paucity of safety and effectiveness data. We sought to report outcomes of a comprehensive approach to supraclavicular TOS decompression with first rib resection in a contemporary cohort of patients with TOS.

Roles of preoperative anxiety and depression in the outcomes of microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm for adolescent patients.

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) has been recognized as the frequently occurring disease of cranial nerve. At the same time, several articles indicate that, dystonia results in certain psychological disorders. Consequently, this study aimed to examine the association of preoperative depression and anxiety with HFS severity; meanwhile, the role in microvascular decompression (MVD) outcomes after surgery among adolescent patients was also examined.All cases had been classified as two groups based on MVD outcomes among HFS cases; in addition, the preoperative Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HARS) and the Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) scores were compared between patients not and still suffering from spasm. Moreover, the multiple logistic regression model was employed in assessing the relationship between preoperative HARS as well as HDRS scores and outcomes of adolescent cases undergoing MVD.The preoperative HARS and HDRS scores showed positive correlation with Cohen spasm grades in HFS patients. Meanwhile, compared with spasm-free group, patients of persistent spams group had apparently higher preoperative HARS and HDRS scores.Our results suggest that, preoperative anxiety and depression status show close association with HFS severity, and they could also impact the MVD outcomes for adolescent cases.

23. Outcomes of direct vs indirect decompression for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A propensity matched cohort analysis

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Debate persists regarding the optimal surgical strategy to treat lumbar spondylolisthesis. The recent development of novel anterior approaches (direct lateral and oblique lumbar interbody fusion) has led to a rise in the utilization of anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedural codes. These new techniques rely on indirect decompression to treat the patient's neural compression, which is criticized by proponents of direct decompressive techniques. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To compare 3- and 12-month outcomes between patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with direct decompression (DD) vs indirect decompression (ID) and interbody fusion. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Lumbar module of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), a national, multicenter prospective spine registry. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> A total of 4,163 patients underwent DD (posterior lumbar laminectomy with interbody fusion) and 86 patients underwent ID (anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation/fusion without laminectomy). <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), NRS-back pain, NRS-leg pain, EQ5D, satisfaction, major complication, minor complication, readmission, and return to work at 3- and 12-months postsurgery, return to OR within 30 days. <h3>METHODS</h3> Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression with surgical procedure as the dependent variable. Independent variables included the baseline covariates that are potentially associated with outcomes. Based on the logit of estimated propensity score, DD patients were one-to-one matched to ID patients using a greedy matching strategy without replacement. Binary outcomes between ID and DD propensity score matched patients were compared using McNemar's test. The estimates of risk difference and relative risk were determined as well as 95% confidence intervals using asymptotic score methods. Continuous outcomes were compared using two sample paired t-test. <h3>RESULTS</h3> In the propensity-matched analysis, the DD and ID cohorts did not differ with respect to their 12 month postoperative improvement in ODI (p=0.262), back pain (p=0.715), leg pain (p=0.144), EQ5D (0.384), satisfaction (0.423), readmission (p=1.00), return to OR within 30 days (p=0.317), return to work (p=0.366), or minor (p=1.00) / major (p=0.480) complication rates. The ID group did demonstrate a statistically-significant lower level of improvement in achieving a 30-percent reduction in leg pain at 3-months vs the DD cohort (p=0.05, RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.7091-0.9996). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> DD and ID strategies to treat lumbar spondylolisthesis were similar in terms of 12-month PRO improvement, readmission, complications, return to work and satisfaction. The ID cohort did demonstrate a statistically-significant lower reduction in leg pain at 3 months, which was not maintained at 12 months. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Post-Operative Outcome of Surgical Decompression for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Post-Operative Outcome of Surgical Decompression for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical and radiological outcomes of endoscopic foraminoplasty and decompression assisted with preoperative planning software for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of using endoscopic foraminoplasty and decompression assisted with a preoperative planning software in the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. This retrospective study included 43 patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis (Jan 2018 and June 2019). These patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the conventional group (group A) underwent endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and decompression. Patients in the experimental group (group B) underwent the same surgery assisted with a preoperative software. The total operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up). The modified MacNab criteria were used to assess the global outcome at 12-month follow-up. Patients in group B had shorter operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and less number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken, as compared with group A. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly lower than pre-operation for both groups at all follow-ups. No significant difference was observed between these two groups. Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent-to-good rate was 86.4% in group A and 90.5% in group B, respectively. After the operation, no patients had residual osteophytes in group B, while two patients still had residual osteophytes and foraminal stenosis in group A. For endoscopic surgery treating lumbar foraminal stenosis, using preoperative planning software could reduce the puncture-channel establishment time, operation time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken without affecting the clinical outcomes.

A study of clinical outcomes of only decompression versus decompression with instrumented fusion for surgical management of lumbar canal stenosis in tertiary health care center in south Gujarat

Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common conditions seen in elderly. It is a degenerative progressive disorder which leads to considerable disability. Patients not responding to conservative management requires surgical intervention. Different modalities for surgical interventions available. Decompression by laminectomy discectomy or micro lumbar discectomy or micro endoscopic discectomy can be done. Decompression with addition of instrumented fusion with help of pedicle screws and rods with or without TLIF/PLIF. Hence to compare the clinical outcomes of decompression and decompression with instrumented fusion this study is done. In most patients, conservative management is considered for relieving pain and functionally improving walking and standing time. The patients not improving with conservative management for at least 6 weeks and having clinically and radiologically lumbar canal stenosis requires surgical intervention. Apart from Minimal invasive surgery Decompression with or without fusion has been traditional definitive therapy offered. In this study we found that surgical treatment was influenced by presenting complaint of the patient. Patients with predominant back pain were more often operated with decompression with fusion whereas patients having radiculopathy or claudication were more often operated with decompression only. In this study clinical outcomes of decompression only and decompression with fusion were found similar. However, blood loss during surgery, duration of surgery and duration for return to work/occupation were more in decompression with fusion surgery which was found statistically significant.

The Influence of Preoperative Narcotic Consumption on Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lumbar Decompression.

Study DesignRetrospective cohort.PurposeThis study aimed to assess the relationship between preoperative narcotic consumption and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar decompression (LD).Overview of LiteraturePrevious studies report negative effects of narcotic consumption on perioperative outcomes and recovery; however, its impact on quality of life and surgical outcomes is not fully understood.MethodsA surgical database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS LD from 2013 to 2020. Patients lacking preoperative narcotic consumption data were excluded. Demographics, spinal pathologies, and operative characteristics were collected. Patients were grouped based on preoperative narcotic consumption. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Physical Component Summary, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Preestablished values were used to calculate achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Differences in mean PROs and MCID achievement between groups were evaluated.ResultsThe cohort was 453 patients; 184 used preoperative narcotics and 269 did not. Significant differences were found in American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, ethnicity, insurance type, and estimated blood loss between groups. Significant differences were also found in preoperative PHQ-9, VAS leg, ODI, and PROMIS-PF between groups (all p<0.05). Mean postoperative PROs did not differ by group (p>0.05). A higher rate of MCID achievement was associated with the narcotic group for PHQ-9 and PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks (both p≤0.050), VAS leg at 1 year (p=0.009), and overall for ODI and PHQ-9 (both p≤0.050).ConclusionsPreoperative narcotic consumption was associated with worse preoperative depression, leg pain, disability, and physical function. In patients consuming preoperative narcotics, a higher proportion achieved an overall MCID for disability and depressive symptoms. Patients taking preoperative narcotic medications may report significantly worse preoperative PROs but demonstrate greater improvements in postoperative disability and mental health.

Microvascular Decompression using muscle graft for interposition: A retrospective study

Objective: This studies aims to evaluate the outcome of Microvascular Decompression (MVD) using a muscle graft for interposition in Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN), Hemifacial Spasm (HFS) and Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia (GPN). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (G.R.S).&#x0D; Methods: In total, 26 patients with TN, HFS and GPN underwent MVD from September 2007 to April 2019. All the patients were either medically refractory or poor symptom tolerance. The mean follow-up period was 72 months. &#x0D; Results: Each MVD was performed using an autologous muscle graft with interposition of vessels. One patient (3.84%) had reoccurrence after MVD with muscle graft and two patients (7.69%) had partial relief.&#x0D; Conclusion: Various types of prosthesis are used for transposition and interposition of vessels in MVD surgeries. Although in our case series we didn't use any prosthesis for the comparative outcome, the use of muscle graft showed minimal reoccurrence rate with benefit of being cost effective. Therefore, we need randomized controlled trials to prove the superiority of muscle graft from other prosthesis material.

Surgical outcomes of decompression alone versus transpedicular screw fixation for upper lumbar disc herniation

BackgroundSurgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations (ULDHs) including T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3 levels are characteristically less favorable and more unpredictable.ObjectivesThis study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes of decompression alone versus decompression combined with transpedicular screw fixation in treating upper lumbar disc herniation.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was carried out at Neurosurgery Departments, Tanta University. The study included 46 patients with a symptomatic high lumbar herniated disc at T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3 levels. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they were operated on via decompression and partial medial facetectomy (group 1, 22 patients) or via the previous maneuver plus transpedicular screw fixation (group 2, 24 patients). All patients were medically evaluated immediately after the operation; then, they were followed up at the 3rd and the 6th months following surgery. Patients’ outcomes were assessed by visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.ResultsMedian VAS scores in each group revealed significant reduction immediately following surgery and at each of 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months in comparison with the preoperative VAS score (p<0.001). Furthermore, each group showed significant stepwise reduction in the median ODI score at the 3rd and the 6th months postoperative compared to the preoperative ODI score (group 1 = 68.0, 19.0, 15.0; p< 0.001 and group 2 = 66.5, 20.0, 15.0; p< 0.001), with no significant differences between both groups (p> 0.05).ConclusionsBoth standalone decompression and decompression combined with transpedicular screw fixation revealed comparable favorable outcomes in patients with ULDH.

Comparative Analysis of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Sole Arterial and Venous Compression: Clinical Features and Surgical Outcomes From 222 Cases.

Background: Compared with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) caused by arterial neurovascular conflict (NVC), the clinical characteristics and managements for TN with venous NVC are not well-established. This study aims to comparatively summarize the clinical features and surgical outcomes of microvascular decompression (MVD) for patients with TN caused by sole arterial and venous compression, with a particular focus on the morphological features of posterior cranial fossa (PCF).Methods: A total of 222 patients with TN caused by sole arterial NVC (188/84.7%) and venous NVC (34/15.3%) underwent MVD in our department from January 2014 to December 2018. The patient data were analyzed retrospectively. Particularly, we focused on the potential impact of PCF on surgical outcomes.Results: Compared with arterial NVC, V3 branch of the trigeminal nerve was more frequently involved in venous NVC (p = 0.009). The most common compression site was root entry zone for arterial NVC (68.6%) and midcisternal segment for venous NVC (76.5%) (p < 0.001). No serious post-operative complication was observed in the two groups. Both short- and long-term outcomes were relatively worse in venous NVC cases compared with arterial NVC cases (p = 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively); and a dominantly higher rate of delayed cure was demonstrated in venous NVC cases (p < 0.001). TN patients with venous NVC revealed a more flat-shaped PCF than those with arterial NVC. Moreover, flat-shaped PCF morphometry was negatively correlated with surgical outcomes of TN patients with arterial NVC, but not with those of venous NVC cases.Conclusions: MVD is an effective and safe treatment for patients with TN caused by either arterial or venous NVC. Patients with a more flat-shaped PCF might be vulnerable to venous compression. Our study demonstrated that PCF morphometry only affected the surgical outcomes of patients with TN caused by arterial NVC, but not the outcomes of those with venous NVC.

Clinical Outcome of Single-Stage Decompression and Posterior Stabilization in Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Abstract Background Thoracolumbar spine constitutes the most common site for spinal tuberculosis. Though the treatment of spinal tuberculosis is antitubercular drugs initially, the patient with neurologic weakness warrants definitive surgical procedure of decompression and stabilization. Even though many investigators have reported favorable results with anterior decompression and stabilization surgery, due to the increased morbidity and complications, the posterior-only approach with decompression and stabilization has evolved as the operation of choice in recent time. Methods All patients aged between 18 and 70 years with clinically and radiologically proven symptomatic thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis who failed with conservative treatment for 4 weeks or developed neurologic weakness between the treatments are included in this study. All patients were offered decompression and posterior stabilization with transpedicular screws and rods after explaining the above procedure. Clinical outcome was measured by modified Frankel grading; AIS (American Spinal Injury Association impairment score) grade impairment score; and pain assessment done with visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperatively and at 3, 6, and 9 months of interval. Results The postoperative pain relief, neurologic improvement as per modified Frankel grade, AIS grade, and improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were significant as compared with the preoperative status. The surgical interventions thus prove to have adequate relief to the patient and arresting the disease progression. The surgical outcome has very minimal intra- and postoperative complications. Conclusion Single-stage decompression and posterior stabilization in thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis is safe, effective, and results in good clinical outcome. The advantages of surgery include thorough debridement, decompression, and achievement of spinal stabilization.

A minimum 8-year follow-up comparative study of decompression and coflex stabilization with decompression and fusion

The current study aimed to compare the outcomes of decompression and interlaminar stabilisation with those of decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) at a minimum 8-year follow-up. The current study also aimed to analyse the risk factors of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A total of 82 consecutive patients with LDD who underwent surgery between June 2007 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 39 underwent decompression and Coflex interspinous stabilisation (Coflex group) and 43 underwent decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (PLIF group). All patients had a minimum of 8-years of follow-up data. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups, and the risk factors of developing radiographic ASD were also evaluated. The Oswestry disability index and visual analogue scale leg and back pain scores of both groups significantly improved compared with the baseline (all P<0.05), and no difference were indicated between the two groups at each follow-up time point (P>0.05). The Coflex group exhibited preserved mobility (P<0.001), which was associated with a decreased amount of blood loss (P<0.001), shorter duration of surgery (P=0.001), shorter duration of hospital stay and a lower incidence of ASD (12.8 vs. 32.56%; P=0.040) compared with the fusion group. The current study indicated that coflex and fusion technologies are safe and effective for the treatment of LDD, based on long-term follow-up data. However, Coflex interspinous stabilisation was revealed to reduce ASD incidence. Under strict indications, Coflex interspinous stabilisation is an effective and safe treatment method.

Outcomes of decompression without fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and substantial back pain

OBJECTIVE The predominant symptom of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is neurogenic claudication or radicular pain. Some surgeons believe that the presence of substantial back pain is an indication for fusion, and that decompression alone may lead to worsening of back pain from destabilization associated with facet resection. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with LSS and clinically significant back pain could obtain substantial improvements in back pain after a decompression alone without fusion. METHODS The DaneSpine database was used to identify 2737 patients with LSS without segmental instability and a baseline back pain visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 50 who underwent a decompression procedure alone without fusion. Standard demographic and surgical variables and patient outcomes, including back and leg pain VAS score (0–100), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D at baseline and at 12 months postoperatively, were collected. RESULTS A total of 1891 patients (69%) had 12-month follow-up data available for analysis; the mean age was 66.4 years, 860 (46%) were male, the mean BMI was 27.8 kg/m2, and 508 (27%) were current smokers. At 12 months postoperatively, there were statistically significant improvements (p &lt; 0.001) from baseline for back pain (72.1 to 42.1), leg pain (71.2 to 41.3), EQ-5D (0.35 to 0.61), and ODI (44.1 to 27.8). CONCLUSIONS Patients with LSS, clinically substantial back pain, and no structural instability obtain improvement in back pain after decompression-only surgery and do not need a concomitant fusion.

A study of clinical presentations of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis & functional outcome of surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis

Background and Objective: The management of lumbar spinal stenosis by surgery has increased rapidly in the past two decades, however, the results are not uniform as reported by different users. Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of surgery in the management of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.Materials and Methods: It is a prospective study which was carried out from August 2015 to January 2017 in MVJ Medical College and Research Hospital, Bengaluru. In this study period 30 patients of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis managed surgically (laminotomy, laminectomy and discectomy) were included after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. JOA scoring system was used to assess the patient’s pre operatively and post operatively at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.Recovery rate was calculated as described by Hirabayashi et al. (1981). Surgical outcomes was assessed based on the recovery rate and was classified using a four grade scale. Excellent, improvement of >90%; good, 75 – 89% improvement; fair, 50 – 74% improvement; poor, below 49% improvement.Results: In our study, majority of the patients were males, at 6 months follow up 27% (n=8) patients showed excellent outcome, 57% (n=17) showed good outcome and 17% (n=5) showed fair outcome.Conclusion: Operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis yields excellent results as observed on basis of JOA scoring system.

The Impact of Neuronavigation on the Surgical Outcome of Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is considered the only etiological treatment for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Nonetheless, despite the recent technological advances, the risks associated with MVD remain non-negligible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of using neuronavigation on the surgical outcomes of patients with TN submitted for MVD. We analyzed 30 consecutive patients (11 men, 19 women) who underwent MVD for TN between January 2019 and December 2019. Patients were divided in 2 groups according to the use of neuronavigation (group A: MVD with neuronavigation; group B: MVD without neuronavigation). The impact of neuronavigation was assessed on the following parameters: craniotomy size, surgical duration, mastoid air cell opening, postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and other complications occurrence, and length of hospitalization. The acute pain relief and the Barrow Neurological Institute score at follow-up were used to evaluate the functional outcome. The craniotomy size, the surgical duration, and the CSF leak incidence were significantly reduced in group A compared with group B (P= 0.0009, P= 0.0369, and P= 0.0406, respectively). The incidence of mastoid air cell opening, and the length of hospitalization were reduced in group A compared with group B, although these differences were not statistically significant. We obtained an acute pain relief in all cases, and the Barrow Neurological Institute score at follow-up was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). Neuronavigation is a useful tool that significantly reduced craniotomy size, surgical duration, and CSF leak incidence in patients with TN submitted for MVD. We advise to routinely implement neuronavigation in this type of surgery.