Outcomes Of Coronary Revascularization Research Articles

Abstract 4138721: Outcomes of Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Contemporaneous Abdominal Organ Transplant

Background: Clinical evaluation surrounding liver and kidney transplantation may reveal obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, little is known about outcomes after revascularization in this population. Our aim was to examine coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous intervention (PCI) in peri-transplant patients compared to the general CABG/PCI populations. Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study between 2014-2022 at a single academic center. Matching was done by optimal full matching of a logistic regression-based propensity score adjusting for age, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, tobacco use, chronic lung disease, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, and valvular disease. Covariate balance was assessed as standardized mean difference <0.2. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, stroke, and myocardial infarction, and a key secondary outcome was incident arrhythmia. Results: The study population comprised 2655 patients: 24 CABG/transplant (median age, 64 [IQR, 59-66]; 4 female [17%]), 1037 CABG/non-transplant (age, 66 [59-73]; 190 female [18%]), 27 PCI/transplant (age, 62 [IQR, 55-67]; 6 female [22%]), and 1567 PCI/non-transplant (age, 70 [IQR, 60-78]; 399 female [25%]). CABG/PCI preceded transplant by a median 321/324 days, respectively, and followed transplant by a median 461/36 days, respectively. For the primary outcome in CABG patients, there were no events in the transplant group and an estimated potential outcome in 6.5% of the matched non-transplant group (marginal RR, <0.001; p<0.001). For the primary outcome in PCI patients, there were no events in the transplant group and an estimated potential outcome in 2.4% of the matched non-transplant group (marginal RR, <0.001; p<0.001). For incident arrhythmia in CABG patients, the estimated potential outcome was 12% and 17.5% in the transplant and matched non-transplant groups, respectively (marginal RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.37-2.6; p=0.97). For incident arrhythmia in PCI patients, the estimated potential outcome was <0.001% and 3.6% in the transplant and matched non-transplant groups, respectively (marginal RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.12-6.5; p=0.91). Conclusions: Patients with contemporaneous abdominal organ transplant undergoing coronary revascularization suffered no in-hospital mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and were not at greater risk of incident arrhythmia than similar non-transplant patients.

Ten-year outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization at a single center.

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is a well-established technique for treating multi-vessel coronary disease. There remains a paucity of discussion assessing the efficacy of HCR with respect to the timing of the surgical component relative to that of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A retrospective review was undertaken of our prospectively collected database from January 2009 to December 2019. Of 395 HCR patients analyzed, we examined the outcomes of 109 pairs of propensity-matched patients who either underwent robotic-assisted minimally-invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) first, or who had PCI prior to surgery. Thirty-day mortality was 0.25% (1 death) for the entire cohort. Mid-term survival for the total 'MIDCAB-first' group was 94.1% (17 deaths), not significantly different to that for the 'PCI-first' cohort (8 deaths, 92.7%), and this was also statistically comparable after propensity matching. Perioperative morbidity was not different between patient groups. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and the incidence of repeat revascularization was similar between the two groups at up to 11-year follow-up. Elevated serum creatinine independently predicted increased MACCE for all patients, irrespective of the sequence of HCR revascularization employed. In appropriately selected patients with multi-vessel coronary disease, HCR is associated with excellent short and longer-term results, irrespective of whether the MIDCAB or PCI procedure is performed first.

Home-based transitional cardiac telerehabilitation in older adults post coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a 12-week home-based transitional cardiac telerehabilitation (Hb-T-CTR) program on health-related quality-of-life and therapeutic self-care in older adults’ post-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). The intervention group (n = 57) underwent Hb-T-CTR, incorporating preoperative counseling, postoperative education, a culturally adapted video, home visits, and telephone counseling, while the control group (n = 61) received standard care. Using the Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire and the Sidani Doran Therapeutic Self-Care Measure, data were collected at three time points. Results showed significant improvements in overall scores for both health-related quality of life (t1=3.386, P = 0.001; t2=4.224, P < 0.001) and therapeutic self-care (t1=7.104, P < 0.001; t2=4.242, P < 0.001) in the intervention group compared to controls. This telehealth approach provides convenient and accessible rehabilitation services for older adults’ post-CABG and highlights the importance of integrating Hb-T-CTR into routine care for personalized rehabilitation. This study underscores the potential of telehealth tools in overcoming barriers and enhancing patient-centered interventions.

Short-term outcomes of complete coronary revascularization compared to staged revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract Background Complete revascularization has been recently popularized for management of ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease scheduled for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI). We assessed the three months outcomes of Compete Revascularization (CR) compared to staged revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing PPCI. Materials and methods We conducted a randomized, open-label, comparative trial on STEMI patients with multivessel disease indicated for PPCI in the setting of STEMI. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo PCI revascularization of the non-culprit lesions during the index procedure, Complete Revascularization (CR) or within 30 days later after discharge, Staged Revascularization (SR). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, re-infarction, Heart Failure (HF), recurrence of angina symptoms, cerebrovascular stroke, and need for revascularization. Results A total of 100 patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio. The primary end point occurred in 24% of the patients in CR and 20% in SR group (p = 0.62). The incidence of HF (14% vs. 12%; p = 0.76), repeated revascularization (4% in each group), persistent angina (8% vs. 2%, p = 0.16), all-cause mortality (2% in each group), MI (4% in each group), stent thrombosis (0% vs. 4%; p = 0.15), and cerebrovascular accident (0% vs. 2%; p = 0.32). Conclusion Staged revascularization provided comparable short-term benefits to complete revascularization in STEMI patients with multivessel disease undergoing PPCI. The present trial demonstrated that complete revascularization was associated with a trend towards higher incidence of stent thrombosis and CVA than staged revascularization. Key words: ST-segment&amp;#x96;elevation myocardial infarction, Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, Revascularization, Multivessel disease. Abbreviations: CAD: Coronary Artery Disease; FFR: Fractional Flow Reserve; PCI: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; PPCI: Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; STEMI: ST-segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction; CVA: Cerebrovascular Accidents.

Issues and considerations in perioperative management of robotic coronary bypass grafting.

Minimally invasive approaches to address coronary artery disease, such as robotic coronary bypass grafting, are emerging in surgery and have been shown to be beneficial with a reduction in morbidity. The perioperative management of this subset of patients is crucial to the success of the operation as there are several preoperative and postoperative issues and considerations that need to be addressed. A meticulous preoperative workup with an extensive history, physical exam, and appropriate imaging are instrumental to ensure a successful operation. Protocolized postoperative care is also essential to garnish the most benefit from this minimally invasive approach. All of these factors, in conjunction with a heart team approach and surgeon experience, are imperative for the successful outcome of robotic coronary artery revascularization.

Effect of case management based on Omaha system on clinical symptoms and quality of life of coronary heart disease patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

To investigate the effect of case management (CM) based on the Omaha system on clinical symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of coronary heart disease patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with coronary heart disease after their first PCI in the People's Hospital of Longhua in Shenzhen were randomly divided into a control group (received CM based on the Omaha system) and an observation group (received routine nursing) using a random number table. Nursing problems and the knowledge-behavior-status (KBS) score of patients were evaluated on the day after surgery, on the day before discharge, at 5 weeks after discharge, and at 12 weeks after discharge. The QOL of patients was evaluated using the coronary intervention coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire (CROQ-PTCA-Post, Chinese version) score on the day after surgery and at 12 weeks after discharge. A total of 104 patients completed the study (51 in the control group, 53 in the observation group). There were no significant differences in baseline data between the 2 groups (P gr.05). The main nursing problems were circulation, mental health, and pain in both groups on the day after surgery, whereas they were circulation, sleep and rest, and mental health after nursing. There were no significant differences in the KBS scores of the co-existing nursing problems on the day after surgery (P Th.05). The KBS scores of the co-existing nursing problems were significantly increased between the 2 groups (P < .01) on the day before discharge and at 5 weeks and 12 weeks after discharge. The KBS scores of the most co-existing nursing problems in the observation group were significantly higher at 12 weeks after discharge than at the day before discharge and at 5 weeks after discharge. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the CROQ-PTCA-Post scores on the first day after surgery between the 2 groups (P gr.05). These scores were significantly increased between the 2 groups at 12 weeks after discharge (P < .01). CM based on the Omaha system for patients after PCI can effectively improve the KBS scores and QOL of PCI patients with postoperative nursing problems, making this approach worthy of clinical promotion.

Association of triglyceride glucose index with the risk of acute kidney injury in patients with coronary revascularization: a cohort study

BackgroundThe triglyceride glucose (TyG) index is a novel and reliable alternative marker for insulin resistance. Previous studies have shown that TyG index is closely associated with cardiovascular outcomes in cardiovascular diseases and coronary revascularization. However, the relationship between TyG index and renal outcomes of coronary revascularization is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between TyG index and the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with coronary revascularization.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to select eligible patients with coronary revascularization admitted to ICU in the medical information mart for intensive care IV (MIMIC-IV). According to the TyG index quartile, these patients were divided into four groups (Q1-Q4). The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI, and secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality and the rate of renal replacement therapy (RRT) use in the AKI population. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to analyze TyG index association with AKI risk. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess the incidence of endpoints in the four groups.ResultsIn this study, 790 patients who underwent coronary revascularization surgery were included, and the incidence of AKI was 30.13%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with a high TyG index had a significantly increased incidence of AKI (Log-rank P = 0.0045). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that whether TyG index was a continuous variable (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06–1.92, P = 0.018) or a categorical variable (Q4: HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.12–3.17, P = 0.017), and there was an independent association between TyG index and AKI in patients with coronary revascularization. The RCS curve showed a linear relationship between higher TyG index and AKI in this particular population (P = 0.078). In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly increased risk of RRT application in a subset of AKI patients based on quartiles of TyG index (P = 0.029).ConclusionTyG index was significantly associated with increased risk of AKI and adverse renal outcomes in patients with coronary revascularization. This finding suggests that the TyG index may be useful in identifying people at high risk for AKI and poor renal outcomes in patients with coronary revascularization.

Comparison of Post PCI TIMI Flow Between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Individuals

Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with diabetes significantly exacerbating the incidence and severity of coronary artery disease. Diabetic patients experience altered coronary blood flow dynamics, which can impact the efficacy of therapeutic interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective: This study aims to compare the post-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades between diabetic and non-diabetic patients to assess the impact of diabetes on the short-term outcomes of coronary revascularization. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Karachi, involving 3,000 patients who underwent primary PCI between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into diabetic (1,500) and non-diabetic (1,500) groups. Data collected included demographics, coronary artery risk factors, TIMI flow grades before and after PCI, and the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing chi-square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparative analysis, with a p-value of &lt;0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The study found significant differences in postoperative TIMI3 flow rates, with non-diabetic patients achieving a higher rate of TIMI3 (59.4%) compared to diabetic patients (58.1%). The use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors was higher in diabetic patients (34.7%) than in non-diabetic patients (1.8%). Additionally, diabetic patients showed a higher incidence of multi-vessel disease and more severe lesion profiles, including higher rates of triple branch lesions (45.9% vs. 39.9%) and left main lesions (53% vs. 43.9%). Conclusion: Diabetic patients exhibit worse post-PCI TIMI flow grades and more complex coronary lesions compared to non-diabetic patients, suggesting that diabetes adversely affects the outcomes of coronary revascularization. These findings underscore the need for tailored therapeutic approaches to improve PCI outcomes in diabetic patients.

Cardiovascular and renal outcomes of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists among patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

BackgroundMultiple cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) have shown the efficacy of GLP-1RAs in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) for high-risk patients. However, some CVOTs failed to demonstrate cardiovascular benefits. ObjectivesWe analyzed the impact of GLP-1RA on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with or without T2DM, with subgroup analysis based on sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body mass index (BMI), and history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). MethodsA comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled RCTs on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until April 2024. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with log odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsA total of 13 CVOTs comprising 83,258 patients were included. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced MACE (OR 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.80 to 0.94, p < 0.01) all-cause mortality OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.82 to 0.93, p < 0.001, CV mortality (OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.81 to 0.94, p < 0.001), stroke (fatal: OR 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.56 to 0.96, p = 0.03; non-fatal: OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.79 to 0.96, p = 0.005), coronary revascularization (OR 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.74 to 0.99, p = 0.023), and composite kidney outcome (OR 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.67 to 0.85, p < 0.001. GLP-1RA significantly reduced MACE in both sexes. Furthermore, GLP-1RA reduced MACE regardless of CVD history, BMI, and eGFR level. ConclusionSignificant reductions in MACE, overall and CV mortality, stroke, coronary revascularization, and composite kidney outcome with GLP-1RA treatment were noted across all subgroups.

National Trends and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BackgroundPrior studies have reported decreased use of an invasive approach for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine whether prior TAVR affects the use of subsequent coronary revascularization and outcomes of AMI in a contemporary national data set. MethodsConsecutive TAVR patients from 2016 to 2022 were identified from the U.S. Vizient Clinical Data Base who were hospitalized after the index TAVR hospitalization with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients with STEMI or NSTEMI with or without prior TAVR from the same time period were compared for the use of coronary angiography, revascularization, and in-hospital outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to account for imbalances in patient characteristics. ResultsAmong 206,229 patients who underwent TAVR, the incidence of STEMI was 25 events per 100,000 person-years of follow-up, and that of NSTEMI was 229 events per 100,000 person-years. After propensity matching, the use of coronary revascularization was similar in the prior TAVR and no TAVR cohorts in both the STEMI (65.3% vs 63.9%; P = 0.81) and NSTEMI (41.4% vs 41.7%; P = 0.88) subgroups. Compared with patients without prior TAVR, in-hospital mortality was higher in the prior TAVR cohort in patients with STEMI (27.1% vs 16.7%; P = 0.03) and lower in those with NSTEMI (5.8% vs 8.2%; P = 0.02). ConclusionsIn this large, national retrospective study, AMI events after TAVR were infrequent. There were no differences in the use of coronary revascularization for STEMI or NSTEMI in TAVR patients compared with the non-TAVR population. In-hospital mortality for STEMI is higher in TAVR patients compared with those without prior TAVR.

Comparing clinical outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization with open coronary artery bypass in patients with multi-vessels lesions.

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) involves the use of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to treat the left anterior descending artery (LAD), and percutaneous coronary intervention to treat non-LAD vessels. We reported the results of a comparative analysis between HCR and off-pump CABG via sternotomy (OPCABG). Data were retrospectively collated from patients who underwent HCR or OPCABG for multivessel coronary artery disease between 2011 and 2022. Propensity score-based matching was performed to reduce the selection bias. The Comparisons of cardiac-related death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and repeat revascularization were performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis or the Fine-Gray test. After matching, the baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups with 91 patients per group. There was no significant difference in operative mortality rate (1.1% for HCR vs2.2% for OPCABG, p = 1.000). However, patients undergoing HCR required a significantly lower rate of blood product transfusions (p < .001) and experienced significantly fewer pulmonary complications than OPCABG patients (p < .001). At 10 years, the incidences of cardiac-related death, MACCE and repeat revascularization did not differ significantly between the two groups (9.5% vs11.5%, p = .277; 4.7% vs12.3%, p = .361; 1.2% vs2.5%, p = .914, respectively). For patients with multi-vessel lesions, HCR was comparable to OPCABG in long-term outcomes such as cardiac-related death, MACCE, and the durability of grafts. Additionally, HCR was better than OPCABG in perioperative outcomes. HCR may be an alternative therapy for OPCABG in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Examining the Outcomes of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Acute STEMI Patients from 2015 to 2022.

The global rise of chronic diseases, especially cardiovascular disease (CVD), poses a significant public health challenge, being a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In Iran, the surge in CVD incidence and its risk factors, along with a decrease in the age of onset, has notably increased the reliance on coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as a life-saving intervention. Staged hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR), which combines percutaneous coronary intervention with delayed CABG, offers a novel approach for patients with complex coronary artery disease, potentially improving survival and reducing complications. Considering the newness of this treatment method and the limitations of previous studies, we investigated the results of staged HCR in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in this study. This observational study was performed on consecutive patients with acute STEMI who underwent staged HCR and were referred to Valiasr and Razi hospitals in Birjand from 2015 to 2022. The required information (demographic information, angiography result, and operation side effects) was collected in a checklist. If necessary, the patients were contacted by phone. After collecting the data, they were entered into SPSS version 16 software. This study was conducted on 33 patients with a mean age of 64.88 ± 9.24 years (69.7% male). The average hospital stay was 11.6 ± 8.9 days (3 to 72 days). The mean ejection fraction and syntax score were 36.5% ± 10.2% and 31.21 ± 6.7, respectively. Following surgery and during hospitalization, arrhythmias were observed, including 33.3% with premature ventricular contractions, 18.1% with atrial fibrillation, and 3.1% with ventricular tachycardia. The average number of pack cells (red blood cells that have been separated for blood transfusion) and creatinine changes before and after hybrid surgery were 640.9 ± 670.9 cc and 0.055 ± 0.07. In the follow-up, 9.09% of patients had late mortality, 6.1% of patients had urinary tract infections during hospitalization, 6.1% of patients had surgical site infections, 3.1% needed dialysis, and none of the studied patients had premature death or need for reintervention. The results of our study indicated that staged HCR performed early after an ACS is not associated with significant mortality or complications. Therefore, it is advisable to consider staged HCR as a surgical option in appropriate cases.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Reverse Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Single-Center Experience

Outcomes of robotic-assisted reverse hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) remain hindered. We aimed to analyze midterm clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted reverse HCR. All consecutive 285 patients who underwent reverse robotic-assisted HCR between September 2005 and July 2021 were included. Reverse HCR comprises percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in non-left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries was performed within 30 days before robotic-assisted left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting and LITA-to-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4-cm left minithoracotomy. Dual antiplatelet therapy was not interrupted in any patient. Preoperatively, mean age was 70.2 years (±11.2). Before surgery, 168 patients received 1 stent, 112 patients 2 stents, and 5 patients 3 stents. Intraoperatively, mean operating room time was 5.9 hours (±1); no case was converted to full sternotomy, whereas 9 patients (3.1%) received intraoperative blood product transfusions. Postoperatively, a small incidence of stroke, 1 (0.3%), reoperation for bleeding, 7 (2.4%), blood product transfusions, 48 (16.8%), and hospital stay (4.8 days) was observed. At 30-day follow-up, 1 patient (0.3%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent on a surgical LITA-LAD anastomosis owing to graft failure. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years. Reported midterm outcomes included all-cause death in 31 patients (10.9%), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in 102 of 285 (35.9%), nonfatal stroke in 2 of 285 (0.7%), myocardial infarction in 17 of 285 (5.9%), and repeat intervention in 50 of 285 patients (17.5%). This single-center study reports effective and safe clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up of reverse HCR procedures for treating multivessel coronary artery disease.

Effect of the Prognostic Nutrition Index on Long-Term Outcomes in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Revascularization

Effect of the Prognostic Nutrition Index on Long-Term Outcomes in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Revascularization

Clinical outcomes of physiology-guided coronary revascularization in patients undergoing TAVR

Abstract Background Coronary artery disease frequently coexists with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Although an fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in native coronary artery has been shown to be associated with better clinical outcomes as compared with an angiography-guided PCI, it is unknown whether this applies to severe AS patients. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of different revascularization strategies between FFR-guided and angiography-guided PCI in AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods In this retrospective analysis, we included 401 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR who had coexisting coronary artery disease at invasive coronary angiography. A total of 156 patients was considered to have significant coronary artery lesions (&amp;gt;50% of diameter stenosis) due to the visual estimation. Patients were divided into 2 groups: physiology-guided (n=96, PCI performed in case of FFR ≤0.80 or diameter stenosis ≥90%) and angiography-guided PCI (n=60, PCI performed based on angiographic evaluation). Patients were clinically followed up and evaluated for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE; defined as a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel failure, and cerebrovascular accident) and major bleeding event defined as ≥VARC-3 type 2. Results Most lesions (62/96; 65%) in the physiology-guided group had negative results and were deferred. During a median follow-up of 743 [from 400 to 1,186] days, physiology-guided group had a significantly lower rate of MACCE compared with the angiography-guided groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.83; P&amp;lt;0.01). In addition, physiology-guided group showed a lower major bleeding event rate compared with the angiography-guided group (adjusted HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.40; P&amp;lt;0.01). Conclusion Physiology-guided PCI resulted in better clinical outcomes and lower bleeding events than angiography-guided PCI in patients with AS undergoing TAVR.

Outcomes of coronary revascularization vs. optimal medical therapy alone for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Outcomes of coronary revascularization vs. optimal medical therapy alone for ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Interplay Between Zero CAC, Quantitative Plaque Analysis, and Adverse Events in a Diverse Patient Cohort.

Coronary artery calcium scoring (CAC) has garnered attention in the diagnostic approach to chest pain patients. However, little is known about the interplay between zero CAC, sex, race, ethnicity, and quantitative coronary plaque analysis. We conducted a retrospective analysis from our computed tomography registry of patients with stable angina without prior myocardial infarction or revascularization undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography at Montefiore Healthcare System. Follow-up end points collected included invasive angiography, type-1 myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular and all-cause death. A total of 2249 patients were included (66% female). The median follow-up was 5.5 years. The median age of those without CAC was 52 years (interquartile range, 44-59) and 60 years (interquartile range, 53-68) in those with CAC. Most patients were Hispanic (58%), and the rest were non-Hispanic Black (28%), non-Hispanic White (10%), and non-Hispanic Asian (5%). The majority had CAC=0 (55%). The negative predictive value of CAC=0 was 92.8%, 99.9%, and 99.9% for any plaque, obstructive coronary artery stenosis, and the composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization, respectively. Among patients without CAC (n=1237), 89 patients (7%) had evidence of plaque on their coronary computed tomography angiography with a median low-attenuation noncalcified plaque burden of 4% (2-7). There were no significant differences in the negative predictive value for CAC=0 by sex, race, or ethnicity. Patients with ≥2 risk factors had higher odds of having plaque with zero CAC. In summary, no sex, race, or ethnicity differences were demonstrated in the negative predictive value of a zero CAC; however, patients with ≥2 risk factors had a higher prevalence of plaque. A small percentage (7%) of symptomatic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography with zero CAC had noncalcified coronary plaque, with the implication that caution is needed for downscaling of preventive treatment in patients with zero CAC, chest pain, and multiple risk factors.

Evidence-Based Optimal Medical Therapy and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background The secondary prevention with pharmacologic therapy is essential for preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction. Guideline-based optimal medical therapy (OMT) for patients with acute myocardial infarction consists of antiplatelet therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, β-blockers, and statins. We aimed to determine the prescription rate of OMT use at discharge and to evaluate the impact of OMT on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era using nationwide cohort data. Methods and Results Using the National Health Insurance claims data in South Korea, patients with acute myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent between July 2013 and June 2017 were enrolled. A total of 35 972 patients were classified into the OMT and non-OMT groups according to the post-percutaneous coronary intervention discharge medication. The primary end point was all-cause death, and the 2 groups were compared using a propensity-score matching analysis. Fifty-seven percent of patients were prescribed OMT at discharge. During the follow-up period (median, 2.0 years [interquartile range, 1.1-3.2 years]), OMT was associated with a significant reduction in the all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.90]; P<0.001) and composite outcome of death or coronary revascularization (aHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.85-0.93]; P<0.001). Conclusions OMT was prescribed at suboptimal rates in South Korea. However, our nationwide cohort study showed that OMT has a benefit for long-term clinical outcomes on all-cause mortality and composite outcome of death or coronary revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era.

Impact of Allopurinol Pretreatment on Coronary Blood Flow and Revascularization Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute STEMI Patients: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial.

The generation of reactive oxygen species, which is induced by the activation of the xanthine oxidase (XO) enzymatic system, is one of the primary causes of ischemia-reperfusion injury for an ischemic heart. Allopurinol, as an XO inhibitor, plays an inhibitory role in free radical production in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of allopurinol pre-treatment on post-revascularization outcomes in patients admitted with STEMI. Ninety patients with acute STEMI were enrolled in this randomized double-blind clinical trial and divided into two equal groups. The allopurinol group received a 600 mg allopurinol loading dose before the emergency PCI, and the control group received a placebo medication of the same shape. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, ECG changes, troponin level, and the occurrence of major cardiac events (MACE) during a 1-month follow-up were assessed. In the end, 81 patients were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 59.52(11.31) and 61.3(9.25) in the allopurinol and control groups, respectively (p = 0.49). The troponin level 48 hours after the PCI and ST-elevation regression showed no significant difference between the groups [(p = 0.25) and (p = 0.21), respectively]. TIMI flow had improved in the allopurinol group compared to the placebo (p = 0.02). The PCI success rate was 78.6% and 61.5% in the case and control groups, respectively (p = 0.09). MACE and other clinical outcomes were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). This study revealed that allopurinol pre-treatment could improve TIMI flow in patients undergoing primary or rescue PCI in an acute STEMI setting.

Rationale and design of the Effects of intensive Systolic blood Pressure lowering treatment in reducing RIsk of vascular evenTs (ESPRIT): A multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial

Lowering blood pressure (BP) effectively reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in high CV risk individuals. The optimal target of BP lowering among high CV risk individuals remains unclear. The Effects of intensive Systolic blood Pressure lowering treatment in reducing RIsk of vascular evenTs (ESPRIT) trial is a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of intensive BP lowering strategy (Systolic BP target <120 mm Hg) and standard BP lowering strategy (Systolic BP target <140 mm Hg). Participants aged at least 50 years old with baseline systolic BP within 130 to 180 mm Hg at high CV risk, defined by established CV diseases or 2 major CV risk factors, were enrolled. The primary outcome is a composite CV outcome of myocardial infarction, coronary or non-coronary revascularization, hospitalization or emergency department visit from new-onset heart failure or acute decompensated heart failure, stroke, or death from CV diseases. Secondary outcomes include components of the primary composite outcome, all-cause death, a composite of the primary outcome or all-cause death, kidney outcomes, as well as cognitive outcomes. Despite of the interruption of COVID-19 outbreak, the ESPRIT trial successfully enrolled and randomized 11,255 participants from 116 hospitals or primary health care institutions. The mean age of the participants was 64.6 (standard deviation [SD], 7.1) years, 4,650 (41.3%) were women. Among them 28.9%, 26.9% and 38.7% had coronary heart disease, prior stroke and diabetes mellitus, respectively. COVID-19 outbreak affected the BP lowering titration process of the trial, and delayed the reach of BP target. The ESPRIT trial will address the important question on the optimal BP lowering target for individuals with high CV risk, and generate high quality evidence for treating millions of patients from East Asian countries.