Abstract 4138721: Outcomes of Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Contemporaneous Abdominal Organ Transplant

Abstract

Background: Clinical evaluation surrounding liver and kidney transplantation may reveal obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, little is known about outcomes after revascularization in this population. Our aim was to examine coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous intervention (PCI) in peri-transplant patients compared to the general CABG/PCI populations. Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study between 2014-2022 at a single academic center. Matching was done by optimal full matching of a logistic regression-based propensity score adjusting for age, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, tobacco use, chronic lung disease, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, and valvular disease. Covariate balance was assessed as standardized mean difference <0.2. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, stroke, and myocardial infarction, and a key secondary outcome was incident arrhythmia. Results: The study population comprised 2655 patients: 24 CABG/transplant (median age, 64 [IQR, 59-66]; 4 female [17%]), 1037 CABG/non-transplant (age, 66 [59-73]; 190 female [18%]), 27 PCI/transplant (age, 62 [IQR, 55-67]; 6 female [22%]), and 1567 PCI/non-transplant (age, 70 [IQR, 60-78]; 399 female [25%]). CABG/PCI preceded transplant by a median 321/324 days, respectively, and followed transplant by a median 461/36 days, respectively. For the primary outcome in CABG patients, there were no events in the transplant group and an estimated potential outcome in 6.5% of the matched non-transplant group (marginal RR, <0.001; p<0.001). For the primary outcome in PCI patients, there were no events in the transplant group and an estimated potential outcome in 2.4% of the matched non-transplant group (marginal RR, <0.001; p<0.001). For incident arrhythmia in CABG patients, the estimated potential outcome was 12% and 17.5% in the transplant and matched non-transplant groups, respectively (marginal RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.37-2.6; p=0.97). For incident arrhythmia in PCI patients, the estimated potential outcome was <0.001% and 3.6% in the transplant and matched non-transplant groups, respectively (marginal RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.12-6.5; p=0.91). Conclusions: Patients with contemporaneous abdominal organ transplant undergoing coronary revascularization suffered no in-hospital mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and were not at greater risk of incident arrhythmia than similar non-transplant patients.