Outcomes Of Cochlear Implantation Research Articles

Surgical Outcomes of Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation and Intracochlear Schwannoma Removal.

Intracochlear schwannoma is very rare, and complete loss of hearing is inevitable after the removal of this tumor. Here, we discuss cochlear implantation (CI) performed simultaneously with the removal of an intracochlear schwannoma. Retrospective single-center study. Tertiary medical institute. Simultaneous CI and intracochlear schwannoma removal were performed in 4 subjects. After subtotal cochleostomy, the tumors were removed meticulously, with preservation of the modiolus. A new slim modiolar electrode (Nucleus CI632) was placed in a manner that hugged the modiolus. The surgical outcomes of functional gain, word recognition score (WRS), sound localization, and hearing in noise and speech intelligibility tests were investigated. Intracochlear schwannomas were removed successfully from the 4 patients, with no remnant tumor. The mean aided hearing threshold 6 months after surgery was 25.0 ± 1.8 dB, and the mean-aided WRS with a 60 dB stimulus was 36.0 ± 18.8% (range 16%-60%). The Categorical Auditory Performance (CAP) score of the 3 single-sided deafness patients under contralateral ear masking was 7. The CAP score of the patient with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was 6, which improved from a preoperative score of 0. When an intracochlear schwannoma does not completely invade the modiolus, CI with simultaneous tumor removal can be performed successfully, resulting in good hearing performance. A slim modiolar electrode can be placed stably at the modiolus after schwannoma removal.

Clinical and Social Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Older Prelinguals.

Cochlear implantation in late implanted prelinguals necessitates a complex decision-making process for clinicians and patients due to the uncertainty of achieving adequate benefit in auditory and speech perception. This study longitudinally evaluated clinical and social outcomes of prelingually deaf children with implantation in their late childhood. Subjects and. A total of 113 (49 females and 64 males) participants, with an age range of 5-15 years, were assessed for the pre-implant parameters such as hearing loss etiology, aided responses, anatomical aspects, and psychological evaluation. The Category of Auditory Performance, Speech Awareness Threshold, Speech Reception Threshold, and Speech Discrimination Score were administered to assess the patient's auditory skills. Further, the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale was administered to evaluate the patient's speech intelligibility at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post-surgery. Subjectively perceived benefits were evaluated using the satisfaction rating scale and a questionnaire. The statistical results showed a significant impact of cochlear implantation in all domains. Positive impact and improvement post-implantation were noted in all the spheres, including auditory, linguistic, social, and educational. The study highlighted that the outcomes of a cochlear implant at a later age might not parallel with the implantation at a younger age. However, this still provides measurable benefits even after a longer period of auditory deprivation.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

To assess spatial hearing, tinnitus, and quality-of-life outcomes in adults with single-sided deafness (SSD) who underwent cochlear implantation. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched from January 2008 to September 2021 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting spatial hearing, tinnitus, and quality-of-life outcomes in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients (≥18 yr old) with SSD were evaluated. Study characteristics, demographic data, spatial hearing (speech recognition in noise, sound source localization), tinnitus (severity, loudness), and quality-of-life outcomes were collected. From an initial search of 1,147 articles, 36 studies that evaluated CI use in 796 unique adults with SSD (51.3 ± 12.4 yr of age at time of implantation) were included. The mean duration of deafness was 6.2 ± 9.6 years. There was evidence of improvement for speech recognition in noise using different target-to-masker spatial configurations, with the largest benefit observed for target-to-masker configurations assessing head shadow (mean, 1.87-6.2 dB signal-to-noise ratio). Sound source localization, quantified as root-mean-squared error, improved with CI use (mean difference [MD], -25.3 degrees; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -35.9 to -14.6 degrees; p < 0.001). Also, CI users reported a significant reduction in tinnitus severity as measured with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (MD, -29.97; 95% CI, -43.9 to -16.1; p < 0.001) and an improvement in spatial hearing abilities as measured with the Spatial, Speech, and Qualities of Hearing questionnaire (MD, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 2.8; p < 0.001). Cochlear implantation and CI use consistently offer improvements in speech recognition in noise, sound source localization, tinnitus, and perceived quality of life in adults with SSD.

Long-term outcome of cochlear implantation on speech perception and quality of life

BackgroundCochlear implantation (CI) is currently a well-established method for restoring hearing to people with profound hearing loss (Blamey and Artieres, Audiol Neurotol 18:36-47, 2013; Holden and Finley, Ear Hear 34:342-360, 2013).Cochlear implantation not only affects hearing abilities, speech perception, and production, but also has an outstanding impact on the social life, activities, and self-esteem of each patient. The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and Parents’ Views and Experiences with pediatric Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (PVECIQ) have been developed to assess the quality of life in such patients (Damen and Beynon, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:597-604, 2007; Hirschfelder and Gräbel, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:357-362, 2008).The long-term outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) in Egypt and its influence on patients’ lives have not been investigated. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term effect of CI on speech perception and to assess the quality of life (QoL) and get insight about major problems encountered by these patients over years.MethodsForty adults and children CI users of least 5 years of CI experience were subjected to full history taking and CI outcome measures: CI questionnaires, aided sound field pure tone audiometry, and speech perception tests.ResultsThrough QoL questionnaires, the highest scores were obtained in the physical functioning domain than in the psychological and social domains in adults, while for children, the highest scores were obtained in the general domain than in the communication and self-reliance domains. No statistically significant correlation was found between QOL questionnaires and speech tests.ConclusionAudiological evaluation including speech perception tests is not enough to reflect the true performance of CI subjects in everyday listening situations. The Arabic versions of QoL questionnaires were complementary to other outcome CI measures. Long-term evaluation for CI users is crucial.

Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry and Auditory Outcomes in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.

To evaluate the relationship between intraoperative neural response telemetry (NRT) and postoperative auditory testing outcomes in children. Retrospective study. Tertiary-care academic center. Children who underwent cochlear implantation using the Cochlear Corporation device between 2010 and 2019 were included. Associations of average NRT and the slope of amplitude with postoperative auditory outcomes including functional auditory measure Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS), and speech perception testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant [CNC], Pediatric AzBio [BABY BIO], Hearing In Noise Test [HINT], and Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech [NU-CHIPS]), measured between 6 and 57 months after implantation, were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation (ρ). Thirty-eight patients (19 female, 19 male) and 54 ears were included. The median age of implantation was 20.6 months (range 9.6 months to 10.6 years). Eight (21%) children had neurologic disorders such as stroke, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, and other causes. Thirteen (34%) children had connexin mutations. Average NRT was not significantly correlated with postoperative auditory outcomes (IT-MAIS [ρ = -0.08, p = .74], CNC [ρ = 0.19, p = .32], BABY BIO [ρ = 0.21, p = .29], HINT [ρ = 0.05, p = .83])and NU-CHIPS (ρ = 0.21, p = .28). The average slopes of amplitude and comfort level were not strongly correlated with any auditory outcomes (p > .05). Intraoperative NRT was not correlated with any postoperative functional auditory outcomes. Patient counseling should include discussions that a subpar intraoperative cochlear response does not preclude favorable speech and auditory outcomes.

Auditory Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Cochlear Implantation Before 12 Months of Age: A Systematic Review.

To systematically review the literature to determine auditory outcomes of cochlear implantation in children ≤12 months old. PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 9/1/2021 using PRISMA guidelines. Studies analyzing auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in children ≤12 months of age were included. Non-English studies and case reports were excluded. Outcome measures included functional and objective auditory results. Two independent reviewers evaluated each abstract and article. Heterogeneity and bias across studies were evaluated. Of 305 articles identified, 17 met inclusion criteria. There were 642 children ages 2 to 12 months at CI. The most common etiologies of hearing loss were congenital CMV, meningitis, idiopathic hearing loss, and GJB2 mutations and other genetic causes. All studies concluded that early CI was safe. Overall, outcomes improved following early CI: IT-MAIS (9 studies), LittlEARS (4 studies), PTA (3 studies), CAP (3 studies), GASP (3 studies), and LNT (3 studies). Nine studies compared outcomes to an older implantation group (>12 months); of these (n = 450 early CI, n = 1189 late CI), 8 studies showed earlier CI achieved comparable or better auditory outcomes than later implantation, whereas 1 study (n = 120) concluded no differences in speech perception improvement. Auditory outcomes were overall improved in children ≤12 months old undergoing CI. Studies that compared early to late CI demonstrated similar or better auditory outcomes in early implantation group. Given the comparable safety profile and critical time period of speech and language acquisition, earlier CI should be considered for infants with hearing loss.

Approach to Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts.

To evaluate the safety and outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts to inform clinical practice. Historical cohort study. Tertiary referral centers. A multi-institutional historical cohort of patients with VP shunts and CI was identified and analyzed. A total of 46 patients (median age 8 years [interquratile range, IQR: 2-46]) with VP shunts and CI were identified. Of these, 41 (89%) patients had a VP shunt prior to CI. Based on institutional preference and individual patient factors, CI was performed contralateral to a pre-existing VP shunt in 24 of these 41 cases (59%) and ipsilateral in 17 (41%). Furthermore, pre-CI relocation of the VP shunt was performed in 3 cases (7%), and 2 patients (5%) underwent planned revision of their VP shunt concurrent with CI. In total, 2 of 27 pediatric patients (7%) required unanticipated revision shunt surgery, both contralateral to CI device placement, given VP shunt malfunction. One of 19 adult patients (5%) required shunt revision during CI due to shunt damage noted intraoperatively. Among 43 patients with available follow-up, 38 (88%) are regular CI users, with a median consonant-nucleus vowel-consonant word: score of 58% (IQR: 28-72). CI can be performed at low risk, either contralateral or ipsilateral, to a VP shunt, and does not mandate shunt revision in most cases. Additional considerations regarding CI receiver-stimulator placement are necessary with programmable shunts to mitigate device interaction. Preoperative planning, including coordination of care with neurosurgery, is important to achieving optimal outcomes.

Anatomical and clinical aspects and outcomes of bilateral cochlear implantation in cochlear hypoplasia type IV - a case report

Cochlear hypoplasia is a congenital inner ear malformation (IEM) characterized by a reduced external cochlear dimension, usually accompanied by an abnormal internal architecture. Type IV cochlear hypoplasia is a cochlea with hypoplastic middle and apical turns. It may occur along with dislocation of the facial nerve, associated with semicircular abnormalities, less clearly marked promontory, or stapedial fixation. Such patients can present a broad spectrum of audiological test results, from sensorineural or mixed mild or profound hearing loss. The above anatomical changes may be responsible for intraoperative difficulties during cochlear implantation. In the studied case, a 6-month-old patient was diagnosed with an inner ear malformation - cochlear hypoplasia type IV on both sides. Computed tomography with multiplanar and 3D reconstruction was performed to analyze the middle and inner ear anatomy in detail. Both types of imaging reconstruction helped decide which cochlear implant electrode to choose. Perimodiolar-positioned cochlear implant electrode was found to be the most suitable choice. The patient underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implantation with expected incomplete electrode array insertion on both sides. First repeatable auditory responses were observed two months after the second implant activation. Good parental cooperation with therapists and adequately defined developmental goals in the presented patient allowed the multidisciplinary team to take advantage of the child's intellectual abilities and choose the suitable communication method; however, the patient's auditory responses were obtained slowly. The final auditory results cannot be predicted in inner ear malformations due to abnormal anatomical structure and, thus, heterogeneous innervation within the deformed cochlea. The programming of the sound processor must be individual in each case, based on the child's behavior observation and, if possible, objective test results. Patients with cochlear malformations usually require higher stimulation intensities to obtain sound sensations than patients with a typical cochlear structure.

Effects of Age at Implantation on Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Short Durations of Single-Sided Deafness.

Children with single-sided deafness (SSD) show reduced language and academic development and report hearing challenges. We aim to improve outcomes in children with SSD by providing bilateral hearing through cochlear implantation of the deaf ear with minimal delay. Prospective cohort study of 57 children with SSD provided with cochlear implant (CI) between May 13, 2013, and June 25, 2021. Tertiary children's hospital. Children with early onset (n = 40) or later onset of SSD (n = 17) received CIs at ages 2.47 ± 1.58 years (early onset group) and 11.67 ± 3.91 years (late onset group) (mean ± SD). Duration of unilateral deafness was limited (mean ± SD = 1.93 ± 1.56 yr). Cochlear implantation of the deaf ear. Evaluations of device use (data logging) and hearing (speech perception, effects of spatial release from masking on speech detection, localization of stationary and moving sound, self-reported hearing questionnaires). Results indicated that daily device use is variable (mean ± SD = 5.60 ± 2.97, range = 0.0-14.7 h/d) with particular challenges during extended COVID-19 lockdowns, including school closures (daily use reduced by mean 1.73 h). Speech perception with the CI alone improved (mean ± SD = 65.7 ± 26.4 RAU) but, in the late onset group, remained poorer than in the normal hearing ear. Measures of spatial release from masking also showed asymmetric hearing in the late onset group ( t13 = 5.14, p = 0.001). Localization of both stationary and moving sound was poor (mean ± SD error = 34.6° ± 16.7°) but slightly improved on the deaf side with CI use ( F1,36 = 3.95, p = 0.05). Decreased sound localization significantly correlated with poorer self-reported hearing. Benefits of CI in children with limited durations of SSD may be more restricted for older children/adolescents. Spatial hearing challenges remain. Efforts to increase CI acceptance and consistent use are needed.

Association of Genetic Diagnoses for Childhood-Onset Hearing Loss With Cochlear Implant Outcomes

In the US, most childhood-onset bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is genetic, with more than 120 genes and thousands of different alleles known. Primary treatments are hearing aids and cochlear implants. Genetic diagnosis can inform progression of hearing loss, indicate potential syndromic features, and suggest best timing for individualized treatment. To identify the genetic causes of childhood-onset hearing loss and characterize severity, progression, and cochlear implant success associated with genotype in a single large clinical cohort. This cross-sectional analysis (genomics) and retrospective cohort analysis (audiological measures) were conducted from 2019 to 2022 at the otolaryngology and audiology clinics of Seattle Children's Hospital and the University of Washington and included 449 children from 406 families with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with an onset younger than 18 years. Data were analyzed between January and June 2022. Genetic diagnoses based on genomic sequencing and structural variant analysis of the DNA of participants; severity and progression of hearing loss as measured by audiologic testing; and cochlear implant success as measured by pediatric and adult speech perception tests. Hearing thresholds and speech perception scores were evaluated with respect to age at implant, months since implant, and genotype using a multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. Of 406 participants, 208 (51%) were female, 17 (4%) were African/African American, 32 (8%) were East Asian, 219 (54%) were European, 53 (13%) were Latino/Admixed American, and 16 (4%) were South Asian. Genomic analysis yielded genetic diagnoses for 210 of 406 families (52%), including 55 of 82 multiplex families (67%) and 155 of 324 singleton families (48%). Rates of genetic diagnosis were similar for children of all ancestries. Causal variants occurred in 43 different genes, with each child (with 1 exception) having causative variant(s) in only 1 gene. Hearing loss severity, affected frequencies, and progression varied by gene and, for some genes, by genotype within gene. For children with causative mutations in MYO6, OTOA, SLC26A4, TMPRSS3, or severe loss-of-function variants in GJB2, hearing loss was progressive, with losses of more than 10 dB per decade. For all children with cochlear implants, outcomes of adult speech perception tests were greater than preimplanted levels. Yet the degree of success varied substantially by genotype. Adjusting for age at implant and interval since implant, speech perception was highest for children with hearing loss due to MITF or TMPRSS3. The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that genetic diagnosis is now sufficiently advanced to enable its integration into precision medical care for childhood-onset hearing loss.

A modified form of the St Thomas' Hospital (STH) classification to improve cochlear implantation outcomes.

re-evaluation and modification of the St Thomas' Hospital (STH) classification to improve cochlear implantation outcomes. STUDY DEIGN: a prospective cohort study. children (n=20) between 2 to 8 years old who received a unilateral cochlear implant, all had difficult round window visibility and/or accessibility for electrode insertion. 10 had a round window insertion through the endoscopic assisted cochlear implantation and the remaining 10 had the same insertion using the retro-facial approach. THE SURGERY: two alternative techniques were used to overcome the difficult cases of round window electrode insertion: 1Endoscopic assisted cochlear implantation 2Transmastoid retro-facial approach RESULTS: both techniques proved to be effective and practical to overcome cases with difficult round window visibility and/or accessibility for electrode insertion. Round window insertion is associated with superior cochlear implantation outcomes, so we recommend a new modification to the STH classification to bypass the cochleostomy insertion.

Exploring Effects of Service Model and the Age of Intervention on Cochlear Implant Outcomes

Abstract Introduction: The outcomes of cochlear implantation depend on multiple factors. Several studies have investigated the impact of intervention age, communication mode, and socioeconomic status on intervention outcomes. Nonetheless, there is limited research on how different service models influence parental perception of the implantation process. The present study attempts to explore the effects of intervention age and eligibility criteria-based service on parental perspectives. Method: The Parents’ perspective questionnaire was adapted and modified to suit the social and cultural context of the Indian population. The translated versions of the questionnaire comprising items under the domains of communication, education, and service of the implant center were posed to 102 eligible parents. The effects of the age of surgical and therapeutic intervention were studied on the communication and education outcomes, respectively, whereas the effect of scheme type was studied on the domain of service of the implant center. Subjective responses were also recorded. Results: A comparison of parental ratings suggests no significant differences in the improvement of spoken language or academic competence between the groups. However, significant differences were found in parental concerns regarding their child’s pronunciation. Parents who had self-financed the implantation and habilitation had the least positive responses to questions regarding the services of the implant center. Concerns reported by parents included costs of repair and maintenance, as well as access to counseling services. Conclusion: The insights gained from the study can contribute to the enhancement of service quality. This can be realized through efforts to address parental concerns and facilitate improved access to information and counseling services.

Audiological characteristics and cochlear implant outcome in children with cochlear nerve deficiency.

This study aimed to examine the audiological characteristics and validity of predicting outcomes of cochlear implants (CIs) in children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) based on the internal auditory meatus (IAM) nerve grading system. The audiological characteristics of 188 ears in 105 children diagnosed with CND were analyzed based on the IAM nerve grading system. In addition, 42 children with CND who underwent CI were also divided into four groups based on the system, and their auditory and speech performance at baseline (preoperative) and 6, 12, and 24 months after CI were analyzed and compared with those of the control group (n = 24) with a normal cochlear nerve (CN) and CI. The audiological test results showed no significant differences among the four CND groups in terms of elicited rates of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) (p = 1.000), auditory brainstem response (ABR) (p = 0.611), and cochlear microphonic (CM) (p = 0.167). Hearing in the CND IV group was significantly better than that in the CND I group (p < 0.05). In children with CI, the auditory and speech performance of the control group was significantly higher than all CND groups from 6 to 24 months (p < 0.05) and 12 to 24 months (p < 0.05), respectively. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences between each pair group in the four CND groups (p > 0.05). Children with CND, including those in whom the CN was not visualized by MRI, can benefit from CI. Additionally, the IAM nerve grading system could not predict the outcomes of CI in children with CND.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Pediatrics with Inner Ear Malformations in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahvaz.

Cochlear implantation (CI) has been successful in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) over the last few years. This study assessed the auditory and speech performance results of pediatrics with inner ear malformations (IEMs) following cochlear implantation at the Ahvaz cochlear implantation center and compared the outcomes of various malformations. All pediatrics with IEMs undergoing CI were included in the study. This retrospective study was performed on pediatrics with congenital IEMs who underwent cochlear implantation in Ahvaz cochlear implantation center between 2014 and 2019. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores are two of the most frequently administered tests. The CAP with ranging from 0 (displays no awareness of environmental sounds) to 7 (can use the telephone with a familiar talker), was used to measure the speech perception performance of the implanted children. Furthermore, SIR consists of five performance categories ranging from "prerecognizable words in spoken language" to "connected speech is intelligible to all listeners". Finally, the study included 22 patients. The evaluation of the CT-Scan revealed three types of inner ear malformation: Incomplete Partition (IP)-I in 2 (9.1%), IP-II in 12 (54.5%), and common cavity in 8 (36.4%) individuals. The results were shown that the median CAP score preoperative was 0.5 (interquartile range (IQR): 0-2) and postoperative was 3.5 (IQR: 3-7). There were statistically significant differences in CAP scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.036). The results were shown that the median SIR score preoperative was 1 (IQR: 1-5) and postoperative was 2 (IQR: 1-5). There were statistically significant differences in SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.001). Following a thorough preoperative screening, patients with specific IEMs can be candidates for CI and not a contraindication. There were statistically significant differences in CAP and SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative in the common cavity and IP-II groups.

Long-Term Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Cochlear Nerve Aplasia.

In this study, we aimed to (1) review the long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve aplasia and (2) compare the development of their auditory and speech abilities to children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. This is a retrospective case-control study. Patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant (CI) surgery in a tertiary referral center from September 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed. The study group included 55 children with cochlear nerve aplasia diagnosed using preoperative images. The control group included 35 children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. The control group did not differ from the study group in terms of age at implantation, pre-implantation auditory and speech abilities, or the electrode array type. Cochlear implantation outcomes were assessed using a test battery, including the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) score, the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) score, behavioral audiometry, and closed- or open-set speech recognition tests. The development of auditory and speech abilities was compared between the two groups using Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models. The mean duration of CI usage was 4.5 years (SD = 1.5, range = 2.0 to 9.5) in the study group. The CAP scores, SIR scores, and aided hearing thresholds improved significantly post-implantation in the study group, but were significantly poorer than those in the control group. Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models showed that the development of CAP and SIR scores was significantly slower in the study group than in the control group. Overall, 27 (49%) children with cochlear nerve aplasia had some degree of open-set speech perception skills, but the monosyllabic and bisyllabic word recognition rates were significantly lower than those in the control group. For children with cochlear nerve aplasia, auditory perception and speech intelligibility continued to improve in the long-term follow-up, but this progress was significantly slower than in children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. Most children with cochlear nerve aplasia could obtain the ability of common phrase perception and understanding simple spoken language with consistent CI usage and auditory rehabilitation.

Crossmodal benefits to vocal emotion perception in cochlear implant users.

Speech comprehension counts as a benchmark outcome of cochlear implants (CIs)-disregarding the communicative importance of efficient integration of audiovisual (AV) socio-emotional information. We investigated effects of time-synchronized facial information on vocal emotion recognition (VER). In Experiment 1, 26 CI users and normal-hearing (NH) individuals classified emotions for auditory-only, AV congruent, or AV incongruent utterances. In Experiment 2, we compared crossmodal effects between groups with adaptive testing, calibrating auditory difficulty via voice morphs from emotional caricatures to anti-caricatures. CI users performed lower than NH individuals, and VER was correlated with life quality. Importantly, they showed larger benefits to VER with congruent facial emotional information even at equal auditory-only performance levels, suggesting that their larger crossmodal benefits result from deafness-related compensation rather than degraded acoustic representations. Crucially, vocal caricatures enhanced CI users' VER. Findings advocate AV stimuli during CI rehabilitation and suggest perspectives of caricaturing for both perceptual trainings and sound processor technology.

Preoperative Reading Efficiency as a Predictor of Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

1) Scores of reading efficiency (the Test of Word Reading Efficiency, second edition) obtained in adults before cochlear implant surgery will be predictive of speech recognition outcomes 6 months after surgery; and 2) Cochlear implantation will lead to improvements in language processing as measured through reading efficiency from preimplantation to postimplantation. Adult cochlear implant (CI) users display remarkable variability in speech recognition outcomes. "Top-down" processing-the use of cognitive resources to make sense of degraded speech-contributes to speech recognition abilities in CI users. One area that has received little attention is the efficiency of lexical and phonological processing. In this study, a visual measure of word and nonword reading efficiency-relying on lexical and phonological processing, respectively-was investigated for its ability to predict CI speech recognition outcomes, as well as to identify any improvements after implantation. Twenty-four postlingually deaf adult CI candidates were tested on the Test of Word Reading Efficiency, Second Edition preoperatively and again 6 months post-CI. Six-month post-CI speech recognition measures were also assessed across a battery of word and sentence recognition. Preoperative nonword reading scores were moderately predictive of sentence recognition outcomes, but real word reading scores were not; word recognition scores were not predicted by either. No 6-month post-CI improvement was demonstrated in either word or nonword reading efficiency. Phonological processing as measured by the Test of Word Reading Efficiency, Second Edition nonword reading predicts to a moderate degree 6-month sentence recognition outcomes in adult CI users. Reading efficiency did not improve after implantation, although this could be because of the relatively short duration of CI use.

Institutional Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Deprived Population.

Cochlear implantation (CI) surgeries are safe and performed successfully in many patients; however, postoperative complications still occur, which may be influenced by socioeconomic and demographic variables. Methodology: This is a retrospective observational study of 146 adults and children with hearing loss, who had CI surgery between 2017 and 2022. This study aims to assess the frequency and nature of surgical complications in patients from a low socioeconomic background who underwent CIsurgery in different geographic areas. For the analysis of data, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used. A total of 146 candidates were evaluated, out of which 82 were male (56.16%) and 64 (43.84%) were female. The age of patients at the time of surgery ranged from 1-50 years. All of the patients underwent unilateral CI. Eighteen implanted patients developed minor complications with an incidence rate of 12.31%. There were no major complications observed. Further, we did not observe any post-operative meningitis as our study group was vaccinated against pneumococcal and meningococcal diseases and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib). CI is an effective and safe surgical procedure for the treatment and rehabilitation of people who are deaf. It is possible to avoid complications by using meticulous surgical methods and regular post-operative monitoring to identify and treat any issues as soon as possible, regardless of socioeconomic status.

A 3-Year Follow-Up and Radiological Analysis of Cochlear Implantation Patients with Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Modiolar Deficiency-Type Malformations.

Cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) is often combined with modiolar deficiency-type inner ear malformations, which cause variable cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes. We aimed to assess the postoperative development of auditory and speech perception in CND patients with modiolar deficiency-type malformations after 3 years of follow-up to determine the factors correlated with CI outcomes. Sixty-seven CND patients with modiolar deficiency-type malformations who underwent CI surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Modiolar deficiency-type malformations included common cavity (CC), cochlear hypoplasia (CH) (including CH-I and CH-II) and incomplete partition-I (IP-I). Categorical auditory performance (CAP) and the infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale (MAIS) were used to assess auditory ability. The speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and meaningful use of speech scale (MUSS) were used to assess the speech intelligibility of these CI patients. The CI outcomes were evaluated at 0, 12, 24 and 36 months after implant activation. All patients demonstrated improvements in auditory ability and speech intelligibility after CI. There were no significant differences in CI outcomes at any time point according to the malformation type. The number of nerve bundles within the internal auditory canal (IAC) showed significant differences at 12, 24 and 36 months after CI ( p < 0.05). Patients with one nerve bundle had relatively poor CI outcomes. CND patients with modiolar deficiency-type malformations showed continuous improvement in auditory and speech abilities after CI. Compared with malformations, the number of nerve bundles should be given more attention when selecting the side for CI.

Comparison of treatment modalities for single-sided deafness in paediatric patients.

Children with single-sided deafness often receive inconsistent clinical recommendations because there is currently no clear best practice in paediatric single-sided deafness. This systematic review of the literature aimed to compare commonly used treatments and attempted to support the use of a particular treatment modality. This was a comprehensive literature review from 1 January 2000 to 22 February 2022; the study compared the outcomes of bone conduction devices and cochlear implantation in paediatric patients with single-sided deafness. Fifteen studies consisting of 202 patients were examined. Variables including speech reception in quiet and noise, as well as quality of life measures were compared. Both cochlear implantation and bone-anchored hearing aids demonstrated benefits in sound perception. Quality of life measures improved with both modalities. Although both bone-anchored hearing aids and cochlear implantation appear to provide significant improvements, additional research with more direct comparisons is needed to provide more decisive results.