Outcomes In Spine Surgery Research Articles

Thoracolumbar Sagittal Morphology and Segmental Inclination: A Cross-sectional Cohort Study of Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers.

A cross-sectional cohort study. To present a normative value reference of spinal segmental inclination stratified by age and pelvic incidence (PI), and to clarify the impact of segmental inclination on spinal sagittal morphology. Thoracolumbar segmental inclination has been shown to correlate with the clinical outcomes of adult spinal deformity surgery. However, there currently exists no normative value reference in a large sample of asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic adult volunteers were enrolled from the community. All volunteers underwent a standing full-spine anteroposterior and lateral radiograph. Lumbar tilt (LT) and thoracic tilt (TT) were measured to quantify the segmental inclination of the lumbar and thoracic spine. Regional curvature, global balance and thoracolumbar apex were analyzed across different age and PI groups. The correlation between sagittal parameters and age was analyzed using Pearson correlation tests. A total of 618 volunteers were included with a mean age of 38.7 ± 17.1 years (range 18 to 82y). As age increased, the LT and TT significantly increased (P<0.001). The LT was significantly correlated with PI (r=0.410, P<0.001), with the low PI group exhibiting a greater negative LT. The TT remained constant across different PI groups. Compared to the young and middle-age groups, the thoracic apex and lumbar apex were located more caudally in the elderly group (P<0.001). Subjects with a more caudal lumbar apex exhibited a greater negative LT, and those with a more caudal thoracic apex exhibited a greater positive TT. The thoracic spine naturally adapts to a relatively neutral position, yet it tends to tilt forward with aging. The physiological lumbar inclination is predominantly determined by the PI value with a slight backward tilt, and tends to counteract the anterior truncal inclination with advanced age. Physiological segmental inclination should be considered in spinal surgical planning.

Container Plasty in Advanced Painful Osteolytic Vertebral Metastases With Posterior Wall Defect

Study Design: Review of mesh-container plasty (MCP) in osteolytic vertebral metastases. Objective: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of MCP in treating advanced vertebral metastases with posterior wall defects. Background: Diagnosis of vertebral metastases typically relies on the patient’s tumor history, bone scans, or vertebral MRI. Surgical intervention often involves sampling vertebral body tissue for pathologic diagnosis. The revised Tokuhashi score is commonly used to predict survival time in patients with bone metastases. Outcome evaluation frequently employs the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) in assessing spinal surgery outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis included 111 patients treated between January 2014 and January 2018 in our hospital. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: MCP group (n=51) and PVP group (n=60). Grades based on the percentage of posterior wall defect area were established: grade I (≤25%), grade II (26% to 50%), grade III (51% to 75%), and grade IV (76% to 100%). Efficacy was assessed using VAS and ODI. Results: Both MCP and PVP groups exhibited significant pain relief and improved motor function. No significant differences were observed in VAS and ODI scores at any follow-up point (P&gt;0.05). In the MCP group, bone cement leakage occurred in 13 cases, with a leakage rate of 25.49%. However, none of the patients experienced clinical or neurological symptoms. In the PVP group, bone cement leakage occurred in 50% of patients, with 6 patients developing neurological symptoms. Significant differences between the groups were observed in major complications related to bone cement leakage (P=0.03). Conclusion: MCP demonstrates efficacy in pain relief and safety in treating vertebral metastases with deficient posterior walls. It represents a promising option for spinal surgeons managing vertebral metastases with posterior wall deficiencies.

Semaglutide exposure and its association with adverse outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Semaglutide, a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has transformed the therapeutic landscape for type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its effect on osteoclast activity and its potential to induce weight-related muscle loss raises concerns about its impact on spine surgery outcomes. As such, evaluating semaglutide's influence on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is imperative, given the procedure's reliance on successful bony fusion to prevent postoperative instability and further interventions. Using an all-payer database (MARINER), the authors analyzed data from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were 18-74 years of age and who underwent short-segment fusion (≤ 3-level) TLIFs between January 2018 and October 2022. Patients were either exposed to semaglutide or not. A comprehensive 1:3 (exposure vs no exposure) matching was performed based on age, sex, obesity, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, smoking status, osteoporosis, levels of surgery, and basal-bolus insulin dependence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank testing were performed to study the probability of additional lumbar fusion surgery within 1 year. After the 1:3 matching, 1781 patients were identified, with 447 in the semaglutide-exposed cohort and 1334 in the nonexposed cohort. Most patients in both groups were 55-69 years old, and 59.3% were female. Analysis showed that the likelihood of undergoing additional lumbar fusion surgery within 1 year post-TLIF was significantly higher in the semaglutide-exposed group than in the nonexposed group (OR 11.79, 95% CI 8.17-17.33). Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing further confirmed a statistically significant divergent probability in the need for additional surgery within 1 year between the cohorts (log-rank, p < 0.001). Semaglutide exposure appears to be associated with a higher likelihood of additional lumbar fusion surgeries within 1 year post-TLIF, especially in patients receiving the medication for longer durations. Although the mechanisms remain speculative, potential impacts on bone turnover and the onset of muscle loss may be contributory factors. Further research is needed to elucidate the exact mechanisms and to develop strategies for optimizing surgical outcomes in these patients.

Overcoming the Learning Curve in Robot-Assisted Spinal Surgery—How Does It Compare to O-Arm Navigation?

Background: Robotic systems have the potential to significantly enhance the accuracy and outcomes of spinal surgery. Adopting this new technology requires an examination of its learning curve and influencing factors. This study analyzes the learning curve associated with using the Mazor X Stealth Edition system for pedicle screw placement and performs a matched-pair analysis to compare operative durations between robot-assisted and navigation-based surgeries, evaluating the efficiency of the robotic system. Methods: We collected retrospective operative data from patients who underwent robot-assisted pedicle screw placements between December 2020 and June 2024 and conducted a cumulative sum (CuSUM) analysis to assess the learning curve, focusing on the robotic system’s setup duration. Additionally, we compared a group of patients who underwent robot-assisted pedicle screw placements with a pair-matched group who underwent O-arm-based navigation-assisted pedicle screw placements. Results: There was a notable decrease in the robotic setup duration, with a significant shift in trend observed after the first 20 cases. While the initial setup time was 24 minutes, it reduced to 17 minutes in later cases, reflecting a marked improvement in efficiency as the surgeon gained more experience with the robot. Conclusion: Our findings indicate there were no added difficulties using the robotic system compared to the navigation system. Moreover, the learning curve for the robotic system can be quickly surmounted, and it offers clear advantages over previous systems, making it a valuable tool for pedicle screw application.

Assessing a revised-risk analysis index for morbidity and mortality after spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors.

Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has been increasingly used to assess surgical frailty in various procedures, but its effectiveness in predicting mortality or in-patient hospital outcomes for spine surgery in metastatic disease remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive values of the revised RAI (RAI-rev), the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5), and advanced age for extended length of stay, 30-day readmission, complications, and mortality among patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012-2022 ACS NSQIP database to identify adult patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and multivariable analyses, we compared the discriminative thresholds and independent associations of RAI-rev, mFI-5, and greater patient age with extended length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, hospital readmission, and mortality. A total of 1,796 patients were identified, of which 1,116 (62.1%) were male and 1,008 (70.7%) were non-Hispanic White. RAI-rev identified 1,291 (71.9%) frail and 208 (11.6%) very frail patients, while mFI-5 identified 272 (15.1%) frail and 49 (2.7%) very frail patients. In the ROC analysis for extended LOS, both RAI-rev and mFI-5 showed modest predictive capabilities with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.5477 and 0.5329, respectively, and no significant difference in their predictive abilities (p = 0.446). When compared to age, RAI-rev demonstrated superior prediction (p = 0.015). With respect to predicting 30-day readmission, no significant difference was observed between RAI-rev and mFI-5 (AUC 0.5394 l respectively, p = 0.354). However, RAI-rev outperformed age (p = 0.001). When assessing the risk of 30-day complications, RAI-rev significantly outperformed mFI-5 (AUC: 0.6016 and 0.5542 respectively, p = 0.022) but not age. Notably, RAI-rev demonstrated superior ability for predicting 30-day mortality compared to mFI-5 and age (AUC: 0.6541, 0.5652, and 0.5515 respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed RAI-rev as a significant predictor of extended LOS [aOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.13-3.38, p = 0.016] and 30-day mortality [aOR: 5.27, 95% CI: 1.73-16.06, p = 0.003] for very frail patients. Similarly, the RAI-rev significantly predicted 30-day complications for frail [aOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.21-5.72, p = 0.015] and very frail [aOR: 3.69, 95% CI: 1.60-8.51, p = 0.002] patients. However, the RAI did not significantly predict 30-day readmission [Very Frail aOR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.75-3.07, p = 0.245; Frail aOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.79-2.68, p = 0.225]. Our study demonstrates the utility of RAI-rev in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Particularly, the superiority that RAI-rev has in predicting 30-day mortality may have significant implications in multidisciplinary decision making.

Diabetes and heart disease do not affect short-term lumbar fusion outcomes accounting for other risk factors in a matched cohort analysis

ObjectivesComprehensive preoperative management involves the identification and optimization of medical comorbidities while avoiding excessive healthcare utilization. While diabetes and heart disease are major causes of morbidity that can worsen surgical outcomes, further study is needed to evaluate how well current perioperative strategies mitigate their risks. This study employs an exact matching protocol to isolate the effects of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease on spine surgery outcomes. Methods4680 consecutive patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion were retrospectively enrolled. Univariate logistic regression was performed on comorbidity subgroups, then coarsened exact matching (CEM) was employed for patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Patients were matched 1:1 on ten patient and procedural characteristics known to affect neurosurgical outcomes. Separate pairs of exact-matched cohorts were generated to isolate both cardiovascular disease (matched n = 192), and diabetes (matched n = 380). Primary outcomes were surgical complications; length of stay; discharge disposition (home vs. non-home); and 30- and 90-day Emergency Department (ED) visits, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality. ResultsCardiovascular disease and diabetes subgroups were not associated with short term outcomes after matching to control for confounders. Compared to univariate statistics, this method demonstrates that confounding control variables may drive outcomes more than these comorbidities themselves. ConclusionBetween otherwise exactly matched patients undergoing lumbar fusion, diabetes and cardiovascular disease posed no greater risk of short-term adverse outcomes. This suggests proper selection criteria for surgical candidates and effective current perioperative strategies to mitigate these common comorbidities. Further studies are warranted to assess and optimize the cost-effectiveness of preoperative management for patients with common comorbidities.

Spinal deformity surgery in Scheuermann's kyphosis versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: meta-analysis of complications and clinical outcomes.

Surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) may be associated with several complications including extended length of stay and unplanned reoperations. Several studies have previously compared postoperative complications and functional outcomes for AIS and SK patients with mixed results. However, a meta-analysis compiling the literature on this topic is lacking. Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were accessed and explored until April 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications (overall and surgical-site infections [SSI]), readmissions, reoperations, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) score. Mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used for continuous data and odds ratio (OR) was utilized for dichotomous data were calculated across studies. Seven retrospective articles were included in the meta-analysis, including 4866 patients, with 399 in the SK group and 4467 in the AIS group. SK patients were found to have statistically significantly higher rates of overall complications (OR = 5.41; 95% CI 3.69-7.93, p < .001), SSI (OR = 11.30; 95% CI 6.14-20.82, p < .001), readmissions (OR = 2.81; 95% CI 1.21-6.53, p = 0.02), and reoperations (OR = 7.40; 95% CI 4.76-11.51, p < .001) than AIS patients. However, they had similar SRS-22 scores postoperatively (MD = -0.06; 95% CI -0.16 to 0.04, p = 0.26) despite the SK group having lower SRS-22 scores preoperatively (MD = -0.30; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.18, p < .001). In this meta-analysis of studies comparing spinal deformity surgery outcomes in AIS and SK patients, SK was associated with more complications, readmissions, and reoperations. SK did have equivalent SRS-22 scores postoperatively to AIS patients, highlighting the benefit of surgical treatment despite higher complication rates. This data may help inform healthcare institutions, payors, and quality monitoring organizations who examine outcomes of pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery.

Challenges in Contemporary Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Technological, and Patient-Specific Issues.

Spine surgery has significantly progressed due to innovations in surgical techniques, technology, and a deeper understanding of spinal pathology. However, numerous challenges persist, complicating successful outcomes. Anatomical intricacies at transitional junctions demand precise surgical expertise to avoid complications. Technical challenges, such as underestimation of the density of fixed vertebrae, individual vertebral characteristics, and the angle of pedicle inclination, pose additional risks during surgery. Patient anatomical variability and prior surgeries add layers of difficulty, often necessitating thorough pre- and intraoperative planning. Technological challenges involve the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced visualization systems. AI offers predictive capabilities but is limited by the need for large, high-quality datasets and the "black box" nature of machine learning models, which complicates clinical decision making. Visualization technologies like augmented reality and robotic surgery enhance precision but come with operational and cost-related hurdles. Patient-specific challenges include managing postoperative complications such as adjacent segment disease, hardware failure, and neurological deficits. Effective patient outcome measurement is critical, yet existing metrics often fail to capture the full scope of patient experiences. Proper patient selection for procedures is essential to minimize risks and improve outcomes, but criteria can be inconsistent and complex. There is the need for continued technological innovation, improved patient-specific outcome measures, and enhanced surgical education through simulation-based training. Integrating AI in preoperative planning and developing comprehensive databases for spinal pathologies can aid in creating more accurate, generalizable models. A holistic approach that combines technological advancements with personalized patient care and ongoing education is essential for addressing these challenges and improving spine surgery outcomes.

Beyond the Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Navigation Spine Surgery: Refinement of Outcomes With Extended Experience.

Objective This study assessed whether robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) spine surgery outcomes, including operative time and pedicle screw accuracy, continue to improve with extended experience beyond 200 cases. Methods This is a retrospective review of 60 patients who underwent lumbosacral transforaminal interbody fusion using RAN. Patients were segmented into three groups of 20 consecutive cases each. The first group represented a surgical performance baseline leading up to the investigating surgeon's 200th RAN case. The subsequent two groups were selected beyond the 200th case with an average of 15 cases between groups. Pedicle screw accuracy and intraoperative outcomes were assessed. Statistical results were significant if p<0.05. Results Measures of surgical efficiency significantly improved beyond the investigating surgeon's 200th RAN case. As case number increased, the following parameters significantly decreased: registration time (group 1: 16.9±6.5, group 2: 12.9±3.0, group 3: 8.7±1.6 minutes; p<0.05), screw insertion time (group 1: 14.9±3.5, group 2: 10.9±2.0, group 3: 8.4±2.7 minutes; p<0.05), and total operative time significantly decreased from group 1 (175.9±58.2 minutes) to group 2 (135.8±23.9 minutes) (p=0.013) with a non-significant decrease to group 3 (121.5±32.3 minutes). Accuracy (Grade = A) significantly increased across groups (group 1: 87%, group 2: 94%, group 3: 98%; p=0.024). Group 1 had the highest misplacement rate of 3.7% (4/108 screws). The overall misplacement rate was 1.4% (4/290 screws) (Grade C-E). There was a higher rate of lateral screw misplacement compared to medial misplacement. Conclusion Even with a small number of initial cases, RAN spine surgery can consistently be performed with high accuracy and acceptable intraoperative outcomes. However, this study demonstrated refined outcomes with extended robotic experience.

Letter to the Editor. Evidence for ultra-early outcome of full endoscopic spine surgery

Letter to the Editor. Evidence for ultra-early outcome of full endoscopic spine surgery

The impact of sarcopenia on the incidence of postoperative outcomes following spine surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarcopenia is considered to be an important predictor of adverse outcomes following spinal surgery, but the specific relationship between the two is not clear. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to systematically review all relevant studies to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on spinal surgery outcomes. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles published on or before January 9, 2023. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated in a random effects meta-analysis. The main outcome was the risk of adverse outcomes after spinal surgery, including adverse events and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on spinal surgery outcomes. In addition, we also conducted a subgroup analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses to explore the main sources of heterogeneity and the stability of the results. Twenty-four cohort studies, with a total of 243,453 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that sarcopenia was significantly associated with adverse events (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17-2.27, P < 0.001) but was no significantly associated with mortality (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.46, P = 0.180), infection (OR 2.24, 95% CI 0.95-5.26, P < 0.001), 30-day reoperation (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.92-2.36, P = 0.413), deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.69-4.61, P = 0.234), postoperative home discharge (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.26-1.37, P = 0.002) and blood transfusion (OR 3.28, 95% CI 0.74-14.64, P = 0.015). The current meta-analysis showed that patients with sarcopenia have an increased risk of adverse events and mortality after spinal surgery. However, these results must be carefully interpreted because the number of studies included is small and the studies are significantly different. These findings may help to increase the clinicians' awareness of the risks concerning patients with sarcopenia to improve their prognosis.

Advanced Visualization in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: The Ergonomics, Economics, and Evolution of Camera-Based Tubes and Retractors.

Tubular spine surgery has emerged as a hallmark of minimally invasive spine (MIS) procedures. In recent years, thanks to technological advances, tubular dilators and retractors have been integrated with digital cameras to allow for ergonomic, high-definition visualization of the surgical field. To detail the evolution, ergonomics, economics, and outcomes of camera-based tubular spine surgery, spanning the origins of MIS tubular techniques to the current use of operative microscopes and tube-mounted digital cameras (TMDCs). This is a narrative review of studies examining the evolution of tubular spine surgery as well as its most recent advances, with a particular emphasis on advances in visualization of the surgical field. Despite early resistance to tubular techniques due to a steep learning curve, minimally invasive tubular approaches are being increasingly adopted by the mainstream spine surgical community, which has resulted in an expansion of both indications and procedural modalities. This can largely be attributed to the increased quality of visualization, as evidenced by improvements in microscopes as well as emerging technologies like exoscopes and TMDCs. Tubular MIS procedures have also achieved superior efficacy compared with open surgical approaches for the treatment of several spinal pathologies while allowing for improved ergonomics, which may have lasting consequences on surgeon longevity. Advances in visualization technologies have allowed tubular surgery to become an effective, ergonomic, and muscle-sparing alternative to open spine surgery. Further research is necessary to quantify the true costs and outcomes associated with nascent TMDC technology. This work elucidates developments in visualization for tubular spine surgery.

The strategic use of Big Data - A study protocol for a multicenter clinical trial testing if the use of the Swespine Dialogue Support alter outcomes in degenerative spine surgery

BackgroundPatients surgically treated for lumbar spinal stenosis or cervical radiculopathy report improvement in approximately two out of three cases. Advancements in Machine Learning and the utility of large datasets have enabled the development of prognostic prediction models within spine surgery. This trial investigates if the use of the postoperative outcome prediction model, the Dialogue Support, can alter patient-reported outcome and satisfaction compared to current practice.MethodsThis is a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Patients referred to a spine clinic with cervical radiculopathy or lumbar spinal stenosis will be screened for eligibility. Participants will be assessed at baseline upon recruitment and at 12 months follow-up. The Dialogue Support will be used on all participants, and they will thereafter be placed into either a surgical or a non-surgical treatment arm, depending on the decision made between patient and surgeon. The surgical treatment group will be studied separately based on diagnosis of either cervical radiculopathy or lumbar spinal stenosis. Both the surgical and the non-surgical group will be compared to a retrospective matched control group retrieved from the Swespine register, on which the Dialogue Support has not been used. The primary outcome measure is global assessment regarding leg/arm pain in the surgical treatment group. Secondary outcome measures include patient satisfaction, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for pain. In the non-surgical treatment group primary outcome measures are EQ-5D and mortality, as part of a selection bias analysis.DiscussionThe findings of this study may provide evidence on whether the use of an advanced digital decision tool can alter patient-reported outcomes after surgery.Trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on April 17th, 2023, NCT05817747.Protocol version1.Trial designClinical multicenter trial.

P25. Rate and prediction of outcomes of lumbar spine surgery after neuromonitoring signal changes in somatosensory evoked potentials: a 10-year experience

P25. Rate and prediction of outcomes of lumbar spine surgery after neuromonitoring signal changes in somatosensory evoked potentials: a 10-year experience

P143. Impact of cephalad vs caudal lumbar lordosis correction on spinal shape and outcomes of complex deformity spine surgery

P143. Impact of cephalad vs caudal lumbar lordosis correction on spinal shape and outcomes of complex deformity spine surgery

76. Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery with 10-Year Follow-Up

76. Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery with 10-Year Follow-Up

P132. Alignment schematic impact on complications and outcomes in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery

P132. Alignment schematic impact on complications and outcomes in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery

39. Impact of serum albumin levels on lumbar spine surgery outcomes: a Michigan State Surgery Improvement Collaborative study

39. Impact of serum albumin levels on lumbar spine surgery outcomes: a Michigan State Surgery Improvement Collaborative study

The Impact of Navigation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Study of Historical Aspects, Current Techniques and Future Directions.

Background/Objectives: We sought to improve accuracy while minimizing radiation hazards, improving surgical outcomes, and preventing potential complications. Despite the increasing popularity of these systems, a limited number of papers have been published addressing the historical evolution, detailing the areas of use, and discussing the advantages and disadvantages, of this increasingly popular system in lumbar spine surgery. Our objective was to offer readers a concise overview of navigation system history in lumbar spine surgeries, the techniques involved, the advantages and disadvantages, and suggestions for future enhancements to the system. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the development and implementation of navigation systems in lumbar spine surgeries. Our sources include PubMed-indexed peer-reviewed journals, clinical trial data, and case studies involving technologies such as computer-assisted surgery (CAS), image-guided surgery (IGS), and robotic-assisted systems. Results: To develop more practical, effective, and accurate navigation techniques for spine surgery, consistent advancements have been made over the past four decades. This technological progress began in the late 20th century and has since encompassed image-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, advanced navigation combined with robotic assistance, and artificial intelligence. These technological advancements have significantly improved the accuracy of implant placement, reducing the risk of misplacement and related complications. Navigation has also been found to be particularly useful in tumor resection and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), where conventional anatomic landmarks are lacking or, in the case of MIS, not visible. Additionally, these innovations have led to shorter operative times, decreased radiation exposure for patients and surgical teams, and lower rates of reoperation. As navigation technology continues to evolve, future innovations are anticipated to further enhance the capabilities and accessibility of these systems, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. Conclusions: The initial limited utilization of navigation system in spine surgery has further expanded to encompass almost all fields of lumbar spine surgeries. As the cost-effectiveness and number of trained surgeons improve, a wider use of the system will be ensured so that the navigation system will be an indispensable tool in lumbar spine surgery. However, continued research and development, along with training programs for surgeons, are essential to fully realize the potential of these technologies in clinical practice.

Adverse complications of cervical spinal fusion in patients with different types of diabetes mellitus: A retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database cross-sectional study.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent chronic condition that influences spine surgery outcomes. The impact of type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ DM on adverse postoperative outcomes, mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and increased in-hospital costs following cervical fusion surgery remains unclear in the past decade. This study aims to determine the specific effect of different classifications of DM on postoperative complications in patients experiencing cervical fusion surgery. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was acquired between 2010 and 2019. Patients experiencing cervical fusion were included and classified as having type I DM, type II DM, or neither. Patient demographics, hospital characteristics, operative variables, comorbidities, complications, and other postoperative outcomes were assessed. Propensity score matching analysis was used to balance baseline differences. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were employed to determine the risk of postoperative outcomes in patients with different classifications of DM. A total of 267,174 cervical spinal fusions were identified (224,255 were patients without DM, 670 patients had type I DM, and 42,249 patients had type II DM). After propensity score matching, the multivariate analysis of non-DM and type I DM patients shows significant difference in pneumonia (P=0.020). However, type Ⅱ DM served as an independent predictor of an increased risk of acute cerebrovascular disease (P=0.001), acute myocardial infarction (P=0.014), pneumonia (P=0.045), continuous trauma ventilation (P=0.016), chest pain (P<0.001), urinary tract infection (P<0.001), transfusion (P=0.005) and dysphagia (P=0.013), prolonged LOS (P<0.001) and increased costs (P=0.008). Using non-DM patients as a reference, type II DM group demonstrated a higher risk of postoperative complications than type I DM group among patients receiving cervical fusion surgery. This vital distinction could enhance risk stratification and guidance for patients diagnosed with DM before cervical fusion surgery.