Outcomes Of Hip Arthroscopy Research Articles

Short-term Outcomes of Concomitant Femoral Derotation Osteotomy and Hip Arthroscopy.

The goal of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of concomitant hip arthroscopy and femoral derotational osteotomy (FRO) to treat femoral malrotation and intra-articular pathology. Data were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing concomitant hip arthroscopy and FRO between March 2013 and January 2017. Patients were included if they had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up for modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) score, 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical component and Mental component (SF-12 P and SF-12 M, respectively) scores, Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey Physical and Mental (VR-12 P and VR-12 M, respectively) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, and patient satisfaction ratings. Rates for meeting the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also recorded. Nine hips were included, and mean follow-up was 36.9 months. Mean preoperative femoral version was 33.0°. Patients underwent 1 or more concomitant procedures, such as labral treatment, capsular plication, acetabuloplasty, or femoroplasty. At latest follow-up, significant improvement was seen for mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, and VAS score. Additionally, rates of meeting the PASS for mHHS, iHOT-12 score, and HOS-SSS were 100%, 88.9%, and 55.6%, respectively. Rates of achieving MCID for mHHS and HOS-SSS were 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively. One hip required revision derotational osteotomy to treat overcorrection, and 3 hips underwent secondary surgery for hardware removal. Concomitant hip arthroscopy and FRO may yield improved outcomes for patients with concurrent intra-articular pathology and excessive femoral anteversion. Considering that no major complications were diagnosed, this procedure is also relatively safe. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):e739-e746.].

Revision Hip Arthroscopy in High-Level Athletes: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes Comparison to a Propensity-Matched Primary Hip Arthroscopy Control Group

Background: Outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy in the athletic population have not been well established. Purpose: (1) To report clinical outcomes for high-level athletes undergoing revision hip arthroscopy in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) or labral tears and (2) to compare these outcomes against a propensity-matched group of high-level athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data for professional, college, and high school athletes were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed between January 2012 and October 2018. Patients were included if they underwent revision or primary hip arthroscopy and had preoperative and minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores for modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The findings and outcomes of revision athletes were compared with a propensity-matched control group of high-level athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. Results: A total of 32 hips (29 patients) undergoing revision hip arthroscopy and 92 hips (88 patients) undergoing primary hip arthroscopy were included in our final analysis with a median follow-up time of 29.5 months (95% CI, 27.2-32.1 months) and 36.5 months (95% CI, 33.5-37.7 months), respectively. Athletes undergoing revision surgery showed significant improvement in all recorded PRO measurements and achieved patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for mHHS at high rates (80.6% and 83.9%, respectively). When compared with a propensity-matched primary control group, patients undergoing revision surgery demonstrated lower preoperative and postoperative scores for mHHS, NAHS, and HOS-SSS, but the magnitude of improvement in functional scores was similar between groups. Athletes undergoing revision surgery achieved PASS for HOS-SSS at lower rates than the control group (P = .005), and they were less likely to attempt to return to sport compared with the control group (62.5% vs 87.0%; P < .01). Conclusion: Revision hip arthroscopy is a viable treatment option to improve PROs in high-level athletes at minimum 2-year follow-up. The study group showed significant improvement in functional scores and a high rate of successful outcomes. They experienced similar magnitude of improvement as that of a propensity-matched control group; however, they achieved lower postoperative PRO scores and attempted to return to sport at lower rates.

Utility of Ultrasound-Guided Anesthetic Intra-articular Injection to Estimate the Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound (US) guided intra‐hip joint injection to estimate the outcome of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome.MethodsPatients with FAI syndrome (n = 60) were prospectively enrolled in our study. Before hip arthroscopy, a mix of 4 mL 2% lidocaine and 4 mL 1% ropivacaine were injected into the hip joint under the guidance of US. The clinical efficacy of the intra‐articular injection was evaluated by comparing the visual analog scale (VAS) and international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT‐12) results before and after the injection. The outcome of hip arthroscopy was evaluated by iHOT‐12, the modified Harris hip score (MHHS), and the patient's satisfaction 12 months after the operation. The outcome of intra‐articular injection and hip arthroscopy were compared. Factors related to the outcomes of hip arthroscopy were evaluated. The correlation between the efficacy of intra‐hip joint injection and arthroscopy was evaluated.ResultsThe VAS of patients decreased from 11.3 ± 7.7 to 3.3 ± 4.5, and the iHOT‐12 increased from 52.1 ± 23.2 to 84.1 ± 18.1 after intra‐articular injection (all P < 0.001). The iHOT‐12 score increased from 52.1 ± 23.2 to 78.9 ± 19.2, and the MHHS increased from 66.5 ± 6.8 to 81.6 ± 8.1 after hip arthroscopy (all P < 0.001). The satisfaction rate of arthroscopy, including very satisfied and effective patients, was 93.3%. Multi‐variable logistic regression showed that only iHOT‐12 improved value after injection was included in the regression formula of satisfaction, with the β of −0.154, standard error of 0.071, Wald value of 4.720, and OR of 0.857 (95%CI 0.746–0.985) (P = 0.03). Significant correlation was detected between iHOT‐12 scores after intra‐articular anesthesia and at 12 months after arthroscopy (r = 0.784, P < 0.001). So was the iHOT‐12 improved value (r = 0.781, P < 0.001) and the iHOT‐12 improved ratio (r = 0.848, P < 0.001). If we had performed arthroscopy only on patients with post‐injection iHOT‐12 score improvement ≥10, the satisfaction rate of arthroscopy would have increased to 96.6%.ConclusionsUS‐guided intra‐hip joint injection may provide a feasible way to estimate the outcome of hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI syndrome, and could be used as a method for indication selection of hip arthroscopy.

Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes in NFL and Collegiate American Football Players: Single Surgeon Experience with Return to Play, Sustained Return to Play, and Attrition Analysis

Objectives:There has been substantial literature regarding return to play after hip arthroscopy for professional athletes. There is less data with regards to both NFL and Collegiate football players and differences in outcomes between these athletic populations. Our hypothesis was that an arthroscopic FAI corrective procedure in NFL and Collegiate football players would result in improved PROM’s, predictable return to play rates, with higher return to play rates in NFL players vs Collegiate players.Methods:Between 2011 – 2019, 76 hips (65 players) in NFL and Collegiate American football players underwent hip arthroscopy and FAI correction by a single surgeon. An arthroscopic FAI correction procedure was performed for all athletes as previously described by the senior author. All athletes were prospectively followed preoperatively and postoperatively with HOS ADL, HOS Sports, modified Harris Hip, SF-12, VR-12 Physical, VR-12 Mental, and VAS patient related outcomes measures (PROMs). Plain radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with regards to Pincer-type FAI (LCE angle, Cross-over sign (COS), Cam-type FAI (alpha angle on AP and 45 degree modified Dunn radiographs), and Tonnis arthritis grade. Return to play on the roster, return to a game, number of seasons played, and number of games played were retrospectively evaluated via internet search of their respective teams, discussions with team ATC’s, Team Physicians, and Players themselves. Reasons for not returning or no longer playing were also searched and inquired. Players were followed until retirement from the NFL, graduation from collegiate football, or until they no longer were able to play because of injury, by choice, or were cut / released by the club.Results:There were 12 hips in NFL football players and 64 hips in Collegiate American football players. Of the Collegiate players, 31 hips played Division 1, 16 hips played Division 2, and 18 hips played Division 3 level football. The most common positions in this cohort were Linemen (27.7%) and Defensive backs (33.8%). The mean follow-up for all players was 33.4 months. There was a significant improvement for all players for PROMs (Pre to Post, mHHS 70.3 to 95, HOS Sports 52.6 to 92.8, HOS ADL 74.8 to 98.4, SF-12 83.2 to 91.4, VAS 5.2 to 0.9) at mean latest F/U (p<0.01 for each). The rate of return to football for all players was 77.6%. The rate of Return for NFL players was 90%, as compared to 75% for collegiate players (72% D1, 83% D2, 73% D3) (p=.062). The mean number of seasons played after arthroscopy was 2.1 for NFL players (range, 1-5) and 1.74 (range, 1-3) for collegiate athletes. The mean number of games played after arthroscopy was 34.7 games (range, 17-100) for NFL and 17.1 games (range, 0-33) for collegiate players. Six of 12 (50%) NFL players remain active in the NFL and of the 5 not active, 1 was drafted in the 4th round, and 4 were undrafted free agents. All 4 NFL players drafted in the first round remain active in the NFL although one is currently a free agent. An additional 4 collegiate players (5 hips, All D1 athletes) went on to play in the NFL. Only 9.2% (6 players, 7 hips) of players cited continued hip pain as a reason for attrition and all were collegiate players. No NFL players cited persistent hip issues as a reason for attrition. Other reasons for attrition included graduation from college (4 hips, 5.3%), other non-hip related injuries (1 hip, 1.3%), being cut or waived by the club (4 hips, 5.3%), and choosing not return to football (non-injury related) (6 hips, 7.9%).Conclusions:Hip arthroscopy led to a predictable improvement in patient related outcomes measures at a mean 33 months follow-up for NFL and collegiate American football players. NFL players were more likely to return to play than collegiate athletes (90% vs 75%, although non-significant with the numbers available), and higher round draft picks had greater sustained return to play compared to lower round / undrafted free agents. Attrition was rarely the result of persistent hip related pain and was multifactorial in nature in particular for collegiate athletes.

Introducing the Impingement Index: A study of the combined effect of alpha angle and femoral version on outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoral acetabular impingement

Objectives:Many studies within the recent literature have sought to identify the effect of femoral version and other morphologic characteristics on outcomes after primary hip arthroscopy for femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). In addition to femoral version and combined version, our group has recently begun to use the impingement index to stratify patients undergoing this procedure. We define the impingement index as the alpha angle minus the femoral version. The purpose of the current study is to determine the impact of femoral version, combined version and impingement index on patient reported outcomes after primary hip arthroscopy for FAI.Methods:A retrospective chart review of a prospectively collected data was conducted from 2010-2016 to identify consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI. Inclusion criteria are pre-operative CT scan,Results:A total of 456 hips (200 males, 256 females) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at time of surgery was 28.2 (+/- 10). Average follow-up was 2.6 years (range 23-59 months). The cohort experienced clinical improvement (p<0.001) in all patient-reported outcome measures. The mean improvement was 21.4 points for HHS, 17.4 for HOS ADL, 29.5 for HOS Sport, and 34.3 for QOL. There was no significant difference in outcomes scores when stratified by femoral version (<5°, 5-20°, >20°), including at the extremes of femoral version (<-5°, >30°). There was also no significant difference in outcomes scores when patients were stratified by Mckibbin Index (<25°, 25-40, >40°). The net change in mean HOS Sport for impingement index >75 was significantly lower than any other category (14.5 (>75°) vs. 28.1 (45°-75°) vs. 25.7 (<45°).Conclusions:Clinically significant improvements can be expected for all femoral version values when a thoughtful algorithm is employed for indicating patients for hip arthroscopy with version abnormalities. However, patients with significant femoral retroversion and large cam lesions may experience less overall improvement compared with normal or increased version. The impingement index may be a valuable tool for predicting outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy for FAI. An elevated impingement index in the setting of femoral retroversion may portend less improvement in patient reported outcomes. This finding warrants further investigation and informs the preoperative decision-making process when indicating a patient for hip arthroscopy for FAI.

Diabetes Mellitus Is Not a Negative Prognostic Factor for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes and comorbidities in general. The authors sought to compare the outcomes of hip arthroscopy at minimum 2-year follow-up for patients with DM with those of patients without DM. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and December 2014. The inclusion criteria were patients with DM who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears and had preoperative patient- reported outcomes. The exclusion criteria were preoperative Tönnis grade greater than 1, previous ipsilateral hip surgery, and/or previous conditions. All patients with DM were matched in a 1:2 ratio to control patients without DM. The matching criteria were age at surgery, sex, body mass index, workers' compensation, capsular treatment, and acetabular Outerbridge grade 0 or 1 vs 2, 3, or 4. Of 29 eligible patients with DM, 26 (89.7%) had minimum 2-year follow-up. Twenty-six patients with DM were matched and compared with 52 patients without DM. Acetabuloplasty was performed more frequently in the control group (P=.01). There were no other statistically significant differences detected in terms of demographics, preoperative radiographic imaging, intraoperative findings, procedures, preoperative scores, follow-up scores, revision rates, rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty, or complication rates. Patients with DM demonstrated favorable improvements at 2 or more years after arthroscopic labral treatment when compared with a matched control group without DM. The DM group demonstrated a non-statistically significant trend toward inferior outcomes in all patient-reported outcomes, visual analog scale score, and satisfaction. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):241-248.].

Hip arthroscopy has good clinical outcomes in the treatment of osteoid osteoma of the acetabulum

BackgroundOsteoid osteoma (OO) of the acetabulum is a relatively rare disease. However, the the clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy for treatment of OO of the acetabulum are still uncertain.MethodsWe evaluated consecutive patients who were diagnosed with OO of the acetabulum and who underwent hip arthroscopy at our hospital between January 2013 and March 2020. All patients underwent a preoperative physical examination. Preoperative supine anteroposterior hip radiography, cross-table lateral radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in all patients. The alpha angle and lateral center-edge angle were measured before surgery. Supine anteroposterior hip radiography and CT were performed in all patients postoperatively. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and PROs at final follow-up were evaluated.ResultsA total of 6 patients (mean age, 18.7 years; age range, 6–31 years; 5 males and 1 females) were included in this study. The average follow-up period after surgery was 28.3 months (range, 6–90 months). Before surgery, the mean mHHS was 45.2 ± 10.5 (range, 33–56), the mean iHOT-12 was 33.3 ± 14.5 (range, 13–49), and mean VAS was 8.2 ± 1.0 (range, 7–9). At one month after surgery, mean mHHS was 78.7 ± 1.9 (range, 77–81), iHOT-12 was 71.0 ± 4.5 (range, 68–80), and mean VAS was 0. At the final post-operative follow-up, mean mHHS was 89.2 ± 2.1 (range, 86–91), iHOT-12 was 93.5 ± 5.0 (range, 88–98), and mean VAS was 0. All results, except VAS between one month after surgery and at final follow-up, demonstrated statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05). One patient underwent revision surgery.ConclusionsHip arthroscopy has good clinical outcomes in the treatment of OO of the acetabulum. Further study on the mechanism of secondary femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) caused by OO of the acetabulum is needed. More cases of arthroscopic excision and longer follow-up are also needed to better prove the clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy for OO of the acetabulum.

Minimum 5-Year Outcomes for Revision Hip Arthroscopy With a Prospective Subanalysis Against a Propensity-Matched Control Primary Group

Background: There is a paucity of midterm outcome data on hip revision arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: (1) To report minimum 5-year patient-reported outcome measurement scores (PROMSs) in patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy, (2) to compare minimum 5-year PROMSs with a propensity-matched control group that underwent primary hip arthroscopy, and (3) to compare the rate of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at minimum 5-year follow-up between the revision group and the propensity-matched control primary group. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were prospectively collected between June 2008 and April 2014. Patients were included who underwent revision hip arthroscopy with preoperative and minimum 5-year follow-up scores for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Patients with Tönnis grade >1 or with hip conditions such as avascular necrosis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and pigmented villonodular synovitis were excluded. A subanalysis was performed against a propensity-matched control group that underwent primary surgery. Groups were propensity matched in a 1:2 ratio for sex, age, body mass index, and follow-up time. Results: A total of 127 revision arthroscopies (113 patients) were included, and the mean ± SD follow-up time was 72.8 ± 23.3 months. The revision group was 74.0% female, and the average age and body mass index were 34.9 ± 12.4 years and 24.8 ± 4.2, respectively. The revision group demonstrated improvement for all PROMSs and reached the MCID for the mHHS (66.1%), HOS-SSS (68.4%), NAHS (66.9%), and VAS (80.0%). All revision cases were propensity matched to 254 primary arthroscopy cases. PROMSs in the revision group were lower than those of the control group before and after surgery. Delta values were similar between groups for all PROMSs. There were no differences in rates of achieving the MCID. The relative risk of arthroplasty conversion was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5-4.6) for the revision group as compared with the primary group. Conclusion: Significant improvement in all PROMSs, including the VAS, and high patient satisfaction at minimum 5-year follow-up were reported after revision hip arthroscopy. A high proportion of patients in the revision cohort reached the MCID for the mHHS, HOS-SSS, NAHS, and VAS, with similar rates and magnitudes of improvement relative to the control group. As expected, these data indicate that patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy have higher PROMSs before and after surgery and lower rates of conversion to arthroplasty.

Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Hip Labrum Calcification in Young and Middle-Aged Patients.

ObjectiveTo investigate the methods and outcomes of hip arthroscopy for hip labrum calcification, and to discuss the clinical, imaging, and intraoperative findings of hip labrum calcification.MethodsThis is a therapeutic case series study. From January 2015 to June 2018, 15 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed up for at least 2 years for an analysis on the outcomes of arthroscopy in the treatment of hip labrum calcification and the clinical, imaging, and intraoperative findings of the patients. There were eight males and seven females, with an average age of 38.9 ± 8.8 years (range, 23–50 years). The visual analog scale (VAS), the modified Harris hip score (mHSS), and the international hip outcome tool (iHOT‐12) were used to evaluate the outcomes of surgery.ResultsA total of 15 patients were followed up for at least 2 years (28.1 ± 2.9 months). The average calcified volume was 118.0 mm3 (range, 19.4–609.2 mm3) and calcified volume was related to the preoperative hip function score. Thirteen patients had pain in the groin area (86.7%). Labrum calcifications were located (according to the clock distribution) as follows: 14 patients were anterior and superior (11:00–3:00); 12 cases of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were observed during operation, including five cases of pincer type, two cases of cam type, and five cases of mixed type. VAS pain score means were 7.73 ± 1.28 before surgery, decreasing to 2.0 ± 0.89 and 1.73 ± 0.79 at 1 and 2 years post‐surgery, respectively. mHSS scores were 57.40 ± 6.23 before surgery and 82.10 ± 4.76 and 83.18 ± 4.07, 1 and 2 years post‐surgery, respectively; iHOT‐12 mean score pre‐surgery was 37.67 ± 4.85, increasing to 67.64 ± 5.30 and 72.18 ± 4.49, 1 and 2 years post‐surgery, respectively. Compared with preoperative values, postoperative VAS, mHSS, and iHOT‐12 scores were significantly improved (P < 0.01); iHOT‐12 scores also significantly decreased from 1 to 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.034). No patient had complications.ConclusionHip arthroscopy is an effective method for the treatment of hip labrum calcification. The size of calcification influenced preoperative symptoms and function. Long‐term irritation from FAI may be one important cause of labrum calcification.

Does Capsular Closure Affect Clinical Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background:There is increasing concern of iatrogenic hip instability after capsulotomy during surgery. Greater emphasis is now being placed on capsular closure during surgery. There are no prospective studies that address whether capsular closure has any effect on outcomes.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes after interportal capsulotomy repair compared with no repair. We hypothesized that restoration of normal capsular anatomy with interportal repair will achieve clinical outcomes similar to those for no repair.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:Adult patients with femoral acetabular impingement indicated for hip arthroscopy were randomized into either the capsular repair (CR) or the no repair (NR) groups. All patients underwent standard hip arthroscopy with labral repair with or without CAM/pincer lesion resection. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog scale for pain, International Hip Outcome Tool, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12).Results:A total of 54 patients (56 hips) were included (26 men and 30 women) with a mean age of 33 years. The HOS-ADL score significantly improved at 2 years in both the NR group (from 68.1 ± 20.5 to 88.6 ± 20.0; P < .001) and the CR group (from 59.2 ± 18.8 to 91.7 ± 12.3; P < .001). The HOS-SS score also significantly improved in both the NR group (from 41.1 ± 25.8 to 84.1 ± 21.9; P < .001) and the CR group (from 32.7 ± 23.7 to 77.7 ± 23.0; P < .001). Improvement was noted for all secondary outcome measures; however, there was no significant difference between the groups at any time point. Between 1 and 2 years, the NR group showed significant worsening on the HOS-ADL (–1.21 ± 5.09 vs 4.28 ± 7.91; P = .044), mHHS (1.08 ± 10.04 vs 10.12 ± 11.76; P = .042), and VR-12 Physical (–2.15 ± 5.52 vs 4.49 ± 7.30; P = .014) subsets compared with the CR group.Conclusion:There was significant improvement in the VR-12 Physical subscale at 2 years postoperatively in the capsular CR group compared with the NR group. Capsular closure appears to have no detrimental effect on functional outcome scores after hip arthroscopy. We recommend restoration of native anatomy if possible when performing hip arthroscopy.

Hip Arthroscopy for Sequelae of Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease: A Systematic Review.

There is no clear evidence on indications and outcomes of hip arthroscopy in sequelae of Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (LCPD). The aim of the current study was to evaluate current literature on the role and outcome of hip arthroscopy in LCPD. A literature search using four databases was conducted in April 2020, focusing on the role of hip arthroscopy in sequelae of LCPD. A systematic search was carried out in confirmation with the Cochrane Collaboration, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of nine studies were included in the systematic review. The total number of hip arthroscopies performed for LCPD was 109. The mean age of included patients was 34.8±7.88 years (7–58 years). Recalcitrant hip pain was the main indication for surgery, followed by pain and stiffness. The most common finding in arthroscopy was labral tears, followed by osteochondral lesions of femoral head or acetabulum and intra-articular loose bodies. Consequently, debridement of labrum tears chondroplasty for cartilage defects and osteoplasty for impingement from deformed femoral head (hinged abduction) were commonly performed. A significant improvement in hip function was seen in all studies. Pooled data of Harris hip score showed significant improvement after surgery was conducted. Hip arthroscopy may be beneficial in patients having symptoms of impingement secondary to changes in labrum, femoral head or acetabulum. Limited evidence shows improved function and range of motion after surgery. This treatment has been found to be safe in terms of complication rates and improvement may persist for years.

Preoperative Psychosocial Factors and Short-term Pain and Functional Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Low mental health scores, depression, and anxiety are associated with worse pain and functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Preoperative screening of psychosocial factors such as self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing may further aid in identifying patients at risk for poorer outcomes. To compare preoperative function and psychosocial factors between patients with and those without elevated postoperative pain 3 months after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Prospective cohort study. University health center. Fifty-one individuals with FAIS (41 women, 10 men; age = 37.6 ± 12.3 years, body mass index = 27.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2). Preoperatively, participants completed the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) for hip pain at rest and during activity. Three months postoperatively, they completed the PSEQ, TSK, PCS, iHOT-12, and VAS. Preoperative scores were compared between those with (VAS ≥ 3) and those without (VAS < 3) elevated postoperative pain using Mann-Whitney U tests, and odds ratios were calculated to determine the odds of having elevated postoperative pain and lower postoperative function. Participants with elevated postoperative pain at rest and during activity had worse preoperative psychosocial health (P ≤ .04). Those with elevated postoperative pain at rest had worse preoperative function (P < .001). The odds of having elevated postoperative pain at rest were 45 times and 4.5 times higher for those with low self-efficacy and high pain catastrophizing, respectively (P values ≤ .03). The odds of having elevated postoperative pain during activity were 7.1, 6.2, and 3.5 times higher for those with low self-efficacy, high kinesiophobia, and high pain catastrophizing, respectively (P values ≤ .04). The odds of having lower postoperative iHOT-12 scores were 7.5 and 14.0 times higher for those with high kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing, respectively (P values ≤ .03). Poor preoperative psychosocial health increased the odds of elevated pain and worse function 3 months after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. This is a first step in identifying the psychosocial factors that may contribute to poorer long-term hip arthroscopy outcomes.

Obesity is associated with less favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature comparing the postoperative outcomes after following hip arthroscopy in obese and non-obese patients. Studies comparing the outcomes following hip arthroscopy of obese and non-obese patients were systematically identified via a computer-assisted literature search of Pubmed (Medline), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing the outcome of hip arthroscopy in different body mass index (BMI) groups were included. Data including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), revision arthroscopy rate, conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and complications were collected. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the quality of each study quality. The effect of heterogeneity was quantified by calculating the I2 value. A total of eight studies were finally included in the qualitative analysis, and three studies of high quality involving 373 hips were included in the quantitative assessment. All the studies defined obesity as a BMI of ≥ 30kg/m2. The modified Harris Hip Score and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score were 5.1 (95% CI 1.1-9.1) and 9.0 (95% CI 5.0-13.1) points lower, respectively, in the obese group than in the non-obese group. The pooled odds ratios were 1.2 (95% CI 0.5-2.7) for revision arthroscopy, 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.6) for conversion to THA, and 3.2 (95% CI 1.2-8.6 for complications in favor of the non-obese group. The heterogeneity was low in all outcome assessments (I2 0-18%). Obese patients had significantly lower PROMs than non-obese patients following hip arthroscopic surgery, and the THA conversion and complication rates were 2.4 times and 3.2 times higher, respectively. Understanding the effect of obesity on hip arthroscopy will allow appropriate surgical indications for surgery to be further refined and help obese patients to understand their individual risk profile. Systematic review of Level III-IV studies, Level IV.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement and Concomitant Tönnis Grade II Osteoarthritis or Greater: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Introduction:Outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and concomitant moderate- to advanced hip osteoarthritis (Tönnis Grade II or greater) is still a matter of debate as findings in the literature are controversial. This study aims to investigate whether hip arthroscopy is effective in treating patients with femoroacetabular impingement and Tönnis hip osteoarthritis Grade II or greater.Methods and Analysis:The protocol follows the PRISMA-P guidelines. The systematic review is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42020210936. The search will include multiple databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane library. The screening and selection process will be performed by two independent researchers based on predefined criteria. All studies published in English or German from inception to 1st of December 2020 that investigated outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients with Tönnis grade II or greater of hip osteoarthritis will be considered eligible. The risk of bias and quality of articles will be assessed using the MINORS tool. Methodological inconsistency and heterogeneity will be explored using the I2 test. This assessment will be used to provide recommendations using the GRADE system.Ethics and Dissemination:Separate ethical approval is not required. This study will be a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review on all published articles reporting on outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and concomitant hip osteoarthritis Tönnis Grade II or greater. It will explore patient reported outcomes as well as radiological outcomes, complications, rates of revision surgery and rates of conversion to total hip replacement (THR). Results of the current review will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and disseminated on research platforms according to copyright rules and rights.Highlights:Hip arthroscopy is used to treat femoroacetabular impingement and is effective in patients that have concomitant hip osteoarthritis Tönnis Grade 0 or 1.Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and in moderate to advanced osteoarthritis – Tönnis Grade 2 or greater, is a matter of debate.The purpose of the current systematic review is to elucidate, stratify and critical appraise the current evidence on outcomes in this patient subpopulation.

10-12 Year Long Term Outcomes and Survivorship of Hip Arthroscopy for Symptomatic FAI

Hip arthroscopy is being used with increasing frequency to address labral pathology and associated femoral-acetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome, yet little is known about the degree of functional recovery and long term outcomes following this procedure. The purpose of this study was to prospectively collect long term, 10-12 year follow up hip outcome scores and survivorship data from a previously IRB approved cohort of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for Symptomatic FAI. All patients underwent a preoperative and postoperative strength test evaluation by a single physical therapist following arthroscopic hip surgery done by a single surgeon for labral pathology and associated FAI. Inclusion criteria for this follow up study included patients that attempted failed conservative treatment with history and exam findings consistent with FAI, an MRI confirming a labral tear and an X-ray and/or CT scan confirming femoroacetabular impingement. This resulted in a final group of 26 patients (16 female, 10 male) with ages ranging from 24 to 61 years (mean ± SD, 37.0 ± 11.9 years). This cohort of patients was contacted 10-12 years following their initial surgery date to obtain their long term Total Hip Outcome Score (HOS), HOS Activity of Daily Living, HOS Sports Scale (Total HOS, HOS ADL, HOS Sport) and modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS). Completed questionnaires were obtained in April 2019 from 10 patients ranging from 9 to 12 years (mean 10.6 years) post operatively from their arthroscopic hip surgery. The mean mHHS score was 88.55 (70.4 to 100.1). The mean HOS ADL was 90.1 and mean HOS Sport was 78.5, with a mean Total HOS Score of 87 ± 10.9 (mean ± SD). Patients rated their current level of function in daily living to be 91% and their current level of function during sports related activity to be 82% on a 0% to 100% scale, with 0 being the inability to perform. It was also shown that Hip Outcome Scores improved significantly from pre-operative to 2 year post-operative assessment (67±15 to 82±13, P = 0.036, n=13). Hip Outcome Scores further improved significantly from 2 years post op to the 10 year post op follow up (82 ± 13 to 86 ± 10.8, P < 0.05, n=7). This study demonstrated that hip arthroscopy for labral pathology and FAI leads to both short and long term return improved function using patient reported outcomes, as well as showed a successful return to daily activity and sport. There are only a few reports showing any long term FAI outcome and only one study showing outcomes post arthroscopic management of labral repair and femoral osteoplasty, but that includes labral debridement, making this the first of its kind to demonstrating 10 year outcomes of this procedure.

Age and Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comparison Across 3 Age Groups

Background: Limited evidence exists concerning the effect of age on hip arthroscopy outcomes for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical failure rates across various age groups in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. We hypothesized that older patients would experience lower improvements in PROs and higher clinical failure rates. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 109 of 130 eligible consecutive patients underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into 3 groups for comparison (ages 15-34, 35-50, and 51-75 years). Clinical survival rates to revision surgery or total hip arthroplasty (THA) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and PROs were assessed using analysis of variance. Regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with clinical failure and ΔPROs from baseline to 5 years. Results: The 5-year survival-to-revision rate was 71% (survival time, 69.2 months; 95% CI, 62.8 to 75.5 months). A significant difference in survival to THA was found between groups (P = .030). Being in the older group versus the young and middle-aged groups predicted increased risk of THA conversion (hazard ratio, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 28.6; P = .035). Overall modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) improved from baseline to 5 years (mHHS, P < .001; NAHS, P < .001). Body mass index (mHHS: beta, −1.2; 95% CI, −2.2 to −0.3; P = .013; NAHS: beta, −1.6; 95% CI, −2.6 to −0.5; P = .005) and baseline PROs (mHHS: beta, −0.8; 95% CI, −1.1 to −0.4; P < .001; NAHS: beta, −0.7; 95% CI, −1.1 to −0.4; P < .001) were predictive of 5-year ΔPROs. A decrease was seen in minimal clinically important difference rates in middle-aged (P = .011) and old (P = .030) groups from 6-month to 5-year outcomes. Conclusion: Although hip arthroscopy for FAI yielded improvements in PROs regardless of age, middle-aged and older patients experienced greater declines in clinical outcomes over time than younger patients. Older patients remain good candidates for arthroscopy despite a greater risk for conversion to THA.

No Correlation Between Depth of Acetabuloplasty or Postoperative Lateral Center-Edge Angle on Midterm Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy With Acetabuloplasty and Labral Repair

Background: The treatment of pincer deformity in hip arthroscopy remains controversial, with some authors advocating that over resection may risk early joint deterioration. The role of acetabular resection depth and postoperative acetabular morphology on postoperative outcomes has yet to be defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study measures the influence of acetabular resection depth and postoperative lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) on minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs), revision rates, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty using a single surgeon’s prospective database. We hypothesized that patients with acetabular resections >10°, as measured by LCEA, or patients with postoperative LCEA outside the normal range of 25° to 35° would have lower PROs, higher revision rates, and higher conversion to total hip arthroplasty at midterm follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 192 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with acetabuloplasty and labral repair by a single surgeon with a minimum 5-year follow-up met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and postoperative LCEAs were measured on supine anteroposterior radiographs, and patients were divided into cohorts based on LCEA and acetabular resection depth. Cohorts for postoperative LCEA were <20° (dysplasia), 20° to 25° (borderline dysplasia), 25° to 35° (normal), and >35° (borderline overcoverage). Cohorts for acetabular resection depth were <5°, 5° to 10°, and >10° difference from preoperative to postoperative LCEA. Outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, satisfaction scores, revision rates, and conversion to arthroplasty rates. Results: Patients significantly improved in all outcome score measures at final follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in PRO scores or conversion to total hip arthroplasty between any cohorts in the postoperative LCEA group. There were more revisions in the 25° to 35° cohort than the other cohorts (P = .02). The 5-10° resection depth cohort demonstrated a higher postoperative WOMAC score (P = .03), but otherwise no statistically significant differences were seen between resection depth cohorts in the remaining postoperative outcomes scores, revision rates, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty rates. Conclusion: Patients with postoperative LCEA values outside the normal reference range and with large resections perform similar to those with normal postoperative LCEA values and smaller resections at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy Versus Physical Therapy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background:Both physical therapy (PT) and surgery are effective in treating femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), but their relative efficacy has not been well established until recently. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the early clinical outcomes of these treatments have been published, with contradictory results.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs that compared early patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of hip arthroscopy versus PT in patients with symptomatic FAI. The hypothesis was that surgical treatment of FAI leads to better short-term outcomes than PT.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:In March 2019, a systematic review was performed to identify RCTs comparing hip arthroscopy and PT in patients with symptomatic FAI. A total of 819 studies were found among 6 databases; of these, 3 RCTs met eligibility (Griffin et al, 2018; Mansell et al, 2018; and Palmer et al, 2019). All 3 RCTs reported international Hip Outcome Tool--33 (iHOT-33) scores, and 2 reported Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and HOS-Sport results. In a random-effects meta-analysis, between-group differences in postintervention scores were assessed according to intention-to-treat and as-treated approaches. Quality was assessed with CONSORT, CERT, TiDieR, and the Cochrane Collaboration tool.Results:The 3 RCTs included 650 patients with FAI; the mean follow-up ranged from 8 to 24 months. All studies reported PRO improvement from baseline to follow-up for both PT and surgery. The quality of the Griffin and Palmer studies was good, with minimal bias. In the Mansell study, a 70% crossover rate from PT to surgery increased the risk of bias. The meta-analysis demonstrated improved iHOT-33 outcomes with surgery compared with PT for intention-to-treat (mean difference [MD], 11.3; P = .046) and as-treated (MD, 12.6; P = .007) analyses. The as-treated meta-analysis of HOS-ADL scores favored surgery (MD, 12.0; P < .001), whereas the intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated no significant difference between groups for HOS-ADL (MD, 3.9; P = .571).Conclusion:In patients with FAI, the combined results of 3 RCTs demonstrated superior short-term outcomes for surgery versus PT. However, PT did result in improved outcomes and did not appear to compromise the surgical outcomes of patients for whom therapy failed and who progressed to surgery.

Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae Predict Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy

Background: While the association between spinal disease and hip arthroplasty outcomes has been well studied, there is less known about the effect of spinal pathology in hip arthroscopy (HA) outcomes. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are anatomic variations where caudal vertebrae articulate or fuse with the sacrum or ilium. Hypothesis: LSTV can lead to inferior outcomes after HA for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected Hip Arthroscopy Database at our institution for patients with LSTV who underwent HA between 2010 and 2017. A total of 62 patients with LSTV were identified and then matched to controls. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected, including the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sports, and the 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool. They were collected at 4 time points: preoperatively and 5 to 11 months, 12 to 23 months, and 24 to 35 months postoperatively. Longitudinal analysis of the PROMs was done using generalized estimating equation modeling. Additionally, alpha angles were measured from preoperative radiographic data. Results: Preoperatively, there was no significant difference between patients with and without LSTV on 3 of the 4 PROMs; however, patients with LSTV did have significantly lower preoperative scores than controls for the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (P = .029). Patients with LSTV reported significantly lower scores on all 4 PROMs at each postoperative time point. Radiographic data showed no significant difference in alpha angles across cohorts. When LSTV were compared by Castellvi type, types 3 and 4 tended to have lower scores than types 1 and 2; however, these comparisons were not significant. Conclusion: The data support our hypothesis that HA has less benefit in patients with LSTV as compared with patients without LSTV. In patients with LSTV, careful evaluation of the anomaly is recommended to help guide surgical counseling and manage expectations.

Age-Associated Pathology and Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Female Patients: Analysis With 2-Year Follow-up

Background: Previous research has demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between hip arthroscopy outcomes and age. Purpose: To investigate the link, if any, between hip arthroscopy outcomes and intraoperative pathology as well as with patient age and sex. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Of 272 female patients aged ≥14 years undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement between August 2010 and September 2017, and with 2-year patient-reported outcome scores, a total of 194 (71.3%) were included for final analysis. These patients were separated into 3 age-based cohorts: <30 years (n = 44), 30 to 45 years (n = 74), and >45 years (n = 76). Their data were then analyzed and compared with respect to patient characteristic information, intraoperative pathology, and functional outcome scores for statistical significance, which was set at P < .05. Results: When an analysis of variance was conducted for the 3 age groups at 2-year follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference for modified Hip Harris Score (P = .0003; <30 years, 88.26 ± 13.1 [mean ± SD]; 30-45 years, 82.68 ± 18.0; >45 years, 75.03 ± 19.5). The results of an analysis of variance comparing 2-year Non-arthritic Hip Score were also statistically significant (P = .0002; <30 years, 89.9 ± 13.7; 30-45 years, 85.8 ± 15.8; >45 years, 78.1 ± 17.2). Results of logistic regression demonstrated that the odds of a cam-type lesion decreased by 0.971 for every additional year in age among female patients. The odds of achieving the patient-acceptable symptomatic state decreased by a factor of 0.96 for each additional year in age (P < .0004). Conclusion: Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in females led to improved functional outcomes at 2 years of follow-up, although older female patients did worse after hip arthroscopy as compared with their younger counterparts. There may be an age-dependent decrease in incidence of cam-type lesions in female patients.