Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Articles

Tailored personas for self-management in home-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: A qualitative study.

Self-management is a key factor determining recovery outcomes in home-based cardiac rehabilitation. However, the impact of individual differences on self-management in patients with coronary heart disease is particularly significant, and standardised approaches often fail to fully meet the needs of this heterogeneous group. This study aimed to explore the heterogeneity of self-management among patients with coronary heart disease undergoing home-based cardiac rehabilitation and construct patient personas to address the unique challenges and needs of diverse patient groups. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted at a cardiac rehabilitation centre in mainland China from April to July 2024. Purposive sampling was used to select patients with coronary heart disease. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to capture their self-management experiences during home-based cardiac rehabilitation. Content analysis was used to extract factual labels and construct dimensional models. Patient personas were developed by categorising patients based on these dimensions, and their self-management personas were visualised using labelled personas. A total of 28 eligible patients with coronary heart disease participated in the study. Three key dimensions were identified to construct the personas: descriptions, characteristics, and needs. Five distinct personas were developed based on individual attributes, highlighting the varying self-management behaviours and needs of patients with coronary heart disease. The personas were categorised as follows: patients who actively seek cooperation in health management, patients with limited knowledge and poor management behaviour, patients with management deficiencies under high work demands, patients with prominent symptoms but strong awareness, and patients with impaired motivation for self-management. Precise interventions based on patient personas are essential for enhancing self-management behaviours during home-based cardiac rehabilitation among patients with coronary heart disease. This study developed five patient personas for self-management in home-based cardiac rehabilitation, providing a basis for precise interventions to address the heterogeneous needs of this patient group.

Evaluating for Health Equity in a Safety Net Hospital: Socioeconomic Status, Adherence, and Outcomes in Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Uncovering the racial/ethnic health disparities that exist within cardiovascular medicine offers potential to mitigate treatment gaps that might affect outcomes. Socioeconomic status (SES) may be a more appropriate underlying factor to assess these disparities. We aimed to evaluate whether adherence, attendance, and outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation are associated with SES in a safety net hospital. We analyzed 542 patients in a retrospective cohort study of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Program at Boston Medical Center from 2016 to 2019. Enrollees had a mean age of 59.4years, 34% were female, 42% Black, and 12% Hispanic. The zip codes of each enrollee were used to obtain their area deprivation index (ADI). The ADI reflects income, education, employment, and housing quality within a given zip code. Associations between ADI and adherence and attendance rate were evaluated while controlling for covariates. Secondary outcomes included associations of ADI with change in exercise capacity, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, weight, quality of life, nutrition, and depression scores. We applied logistic regression to examine the association between adherence and ADI with adjustment on the covariates. The attendance rate was analyzed with negative binomial regression with percent of sessions attended as prescribed as a dependent variable and adjusted on the same covariates. The primary outcome revealed no association for ADI with adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (OR=0.91: 95% CI, 0.74-1.12) or attendance rate (RR=0.91: 95% CI, 0.80-1.04). Utilizing multiple linear regression, secondary outcomes improved among patients regardless of ADI. We found equity in our cardiac rehabilitation program outcomes despite SES.

Efficacy of an Internet of Things-based system for cardiac rehabilitation monitoring: insights from the IntellIoT pivotal trial in heart failure patients

Abstract Aims Digital health solutions targeted to remote clinical monitoring are constantly gaining ground in cardiovascular care. However, evidence regarding their impact on cardiac rehabilitation efficiency in heart failure (HF) patients is relatively limited. In this study, conducted in the context of the IntellIoT project, we evaluated the effect of a purpose-designed Internet of Things (IoT)-based patient monitoring system on cardiac rehabilitation outcomes in a cohort of HF patients. Methods and results Nineteen clinically stable HF patients were enrolled in the study, which consisted of a 12-month standard-of-care run-in phase and a remote follow-up phase of equal duration, whereby an IoT-based e-health system was provided to study subjects. Device-derived data transmission was facilitated by a mobile phone application, coupled with a web-based platform accessible to study physicians. Study endpoints were (i) patient adherence rates to e-health system use and their associations to key clinical parameters, (ii) the degree of change in physical activity, and (iii) total time dedicated by physicians to enrolled patients’ care with and without the aid of the e-health system. Baseline-to-peak increase in daily step count was calculated at 23.34%. System use was associated with a decrease in time dedicated by physicians to enrolled patients’ care. A significant negative correlation was observed between age and progressive drop-in adherence rate to system use (r = −0.5722, P = 0.02). Conclusion Internet of Things-based healthcare constitutes a promising approach in HF patients’ rehabilitation, whereas elderly patients might constitute the population most likely to benefit. However, larger, randomized studies are required to confirm our findings.

Low-Intensity Resistance Exercise in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review of Mechanistic Evidence and Clinical Implications.

Cardiac rehabilitation, a multi-component intervention designed to mitigate the impact of cardiovascular disease, often underutilises low-intensity resistance exercise despite its potential benefits. This narrative review critically examines the mechanistic and clinical evidence supporting the incorporation of low-intensity resistance exercise into cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Research indicates that low-intensity resistance exercise induces hypertrophic adaptations by maximising muscle fibre activation through the size principle, effectively recruiting larger motor units as it approaches maximal effort. This activation promotes adaptation in both type I and II muscle fibres, resulting in comparable increases in myofibrillar protein synthesis and phosphorylation of key signalling proteins when compared to high-intensity resistance exercise. Low-intensity resistance exercise provides equivalent improvements in muscular strength and hypertrophy compared to high-intensity protocols while addressing barriers to participation, such as concerns about safety and logistical challenges. By facilitating engagement through a more accessible exercise modality, low-intensity resistance exercise might improve adherence rates and patient outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation. Additionally, the ability of low-intensity resistance exercise to address sarcopenia and frailty syndrome, significant determinants of cardiovascular disease progression, can enhance the recovery and overall quality of life for patients. This review establishes evidence-based recommendations for the inclusion of low-intensity resistance exercise in cardiac rehabilitation, offering a promising pathway to enhance the effectiveness of these programmes.

Effect of a patient health engagement (PHE) model on rehabilitation participation in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundParticipation in cardiac rehabilitation is low in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although existing rehabilitation methods have achieved certain results, patient participation in exercise rehabilitation is not ideal. The Patient Health Engagement (PHE) model is designed to ensure that patients improve their participation in cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and other aspects in all phases of exercise rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to confirm whether the rehabilitation method based on the PHE model improves the rate of patient participation and enhances the rehabilitation effect during cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared with the traditional rehabilitation model.Methods/designThis is a single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial that will enroll 128 patients. Patients with stable acute myocardial infarction after undergoing PCI who received cardiac rehabilitation and postoperative LVEF ≥ 40%, categorized into Killip class I ~ II and with age ≥ 18 years, will be included in the study. Exclusion criteria are mainly malignant arrhythmias, acute heart failure, congestive heart failure, and patients requiring intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention (1) and control (2) groups. Physicians, rehabilitation specialists, patients, and data collectors will be blinded during the study. A rehabilitator and a specialist nurse will conduct the cardiac rehabilitation. The specialist nurse will hand over the sealed bag containing patient information (group 1 or 2) to the physician. Group 1 will undergo cardiac rehabilitation through the PHE model, three times a week for 3 months. The rehabilitation program will be evaluated and adjusted in time from each period of the rehabilitation. Group 2 will be treated with routine cardiac rehabilitation. The rehabilitation participation rate of the two groups will be evaluated before and after 3 months of intervention. The primary outcome will be the level of patient participation in rehabilitation, and the secondary outcome will include general data of patients, postoperative rehabilitation indicators, cardiac rehabilitation knowledge–attitude–practice questionnaire, cardiovascular adverse events, and a brief mood scale.Expected outcomesWe expect improved cardiac rehabilitation participation rates and rehabilitation outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction after undergoing PCI using the PHE model.DiscussionThis approach may increase patient participation in rehabilitation, improve rehabilitation outcomes, and be widely implemented in hospitals and rehabilitation centers.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, ChiCTR2400085276 (Version 2.0 June 04, 2024), https://www.chictr.org.cn.Trial sponsorShandong Second Medical university, Weifang, Shandong. Contact name: Dechun Qin, Address: Shandong Second Medical university, Weifang Shandong. Email: 13562666589@163.com.

Impact of eccentric cycling in coronary rehabilitation program: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial versus conventional rehabilitation.

This randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility of adding eccentric exercise to a conventional cardiac rehabilitation program (CCRP) for coronary heart disease patients. Ninety-three patients were randomly assigned to either the MIX group (eccentric ergometer + CCRP) or the CON group (concentric ergometer + CCRP) for 7 weeks. Training effectiveness was assessed based on "good responders" showing improved functional capacities, such as 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance and maximal voluntary contraction of the plantar flexors (ankle MVC). Safety was monitored with a visual analog scale for muscle soreness, perceived exertion, and heart rate during training. The proportion of good responders was similar between groups (26% in MIX, 29% in CON, P=0.744). Both groups improved in 6MWT (CON: 12.6%, MIX: 16.14%) and ankle MVC (CON: 15.5%, MIX: 11.30%), with no significant differences. Exercise tolerance did not differ significantly between the groups, but perceived effort was significantly lower in the MIX group (P<0.0001) compared to the CON group. Integrating eccentric exercise into cardiac rehabilitation is safe and well-tolerated. Nevertheless, this study did not find significant advantages over conventional programs for coronary heart disease patients. Further research should explore specific patient groups or conditions where eccentric exercise may be more beneficial, emphasizing personalized prescriptions and gradual workload progression for better cardiac rehabilitation outcomes.

Cost effectiveness and functional outcomes of smartphone cardiac rehabilitation assisted self-management versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation among patients with coronary heart disease in Southern India: a multicentre randomized clinical trial protocol

Background: To attain the world specific indicators of quality on programs which brings rehabilitation for cardiac diseases and surgeries in India are to be brought to meet the international standards. Dearth of published research on cost effectiveness of smart phone application oriented CR assisted self-management (SCRAM) over centre based (CBCR) in Indian Population drives this study to be done. This study aims to analyze cost effectiveness of SCRAM versus CBCR in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Methods: In this multicentre randomized clinical trial, 100 subjects with uncomplicated CAD will be recruited through purposive sampling and divided into group A and B through block randomization. Group A will be treated with CBCR whereas group B with SCRAM. Outcome measures of 6 minutes’ walk test distance, talk test values and SF 36 scores, high density lipoprotein level and 3 months’ average blood glucose level were documented pre and post interventions and 3, 6, 12 months follow up for data analysis. This study will follow human study ethical consideration based on Declaration of Helsinki. Conclusions: Cost effectiveness of experimental group where SCRAM given as intervention may be better post intervention than control group where CBCR given. By this way this RCT protocol may bring the execution cost down with coronary heart disease patients which play a major role in participation of these patients in CR programs. Trial registration: The trial was registered with CTRI – Clinical Trial Registry of India (ICMR) - CTRI/2022/11/047143 (registered on: 09 November 2022) - trial registered prospectively.

Cardiac rehabilitation attendance and outcomes 3 years after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): Linked national data of the SNAPSHOT ACS audit

Abstract Background In international guidelines, cardiac rehabilitation is recommended to reduce readmissions, mortality and improve disease management. However, evidence from a long-term follow-up in a representative cohort is scarce. Purpose To compare 3-year outcomes among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors who attended cardiac rehabilitation programs and those who did not. Methods This was a follow-up of the SNAPSHOT ACS cohort in 1,920 Australians. Clinical data of those presenting with suspected ACS, hospitalised, discharged alive and followed for 18 months were linked to jurisdictional/national regulatory hospitalisation, mortality and pharmacotherapy records. Outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular readmissions. Cox regression was used to analyse all-cause mortality, and Fine and Gray competing risk model for cardiovascular mortality, MI and cardiovascular readmissions, where non-cardiovascular mortality or all-cause mortality were competing events. The models were adjusted for age, sex, discharge diagnosis and coronary revascularisation. Results The cohort was aged 66±13.5 years; 60% were male, 31% had a discharge diagnosis of MI, and 490 (26%) attended cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiac rehabilitation attendees more frequently received coronary revascularisation and had a discharge diagnosis of MI during index admission. Attendees were more likely to be men (70% vs 57%, p&amp;lt;0.001) with a family history of coronary disease (43% vs 36%, p=0.008). The prescription of ≥3 guideline-indicated medications was higher in cardiac rehabilitation attendees. Compared to those who did not attend cardiac rehabilitation, the hazard of all-cause mortality was lower for the attendees (4.3% vs 8.6%, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.91), but the hazard of MI and cardiovascular readmissions significantly greater in the attendees (17% vs 8.5%, HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.41-2.82; 42% vs 33%, HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63; respectively) (Figure). There was insufficient cardiovascular mortality between groups to fit a statistical model (n=7 (1.4%) vs n=24 (1.7%), p=0.705). Conclusions Survivors of ACS attending cardiac rehabilitation were associated with reduced all-cause mortality and increased readmissions related to MI and cardiovascular disease at 3 years follow-up. These findings support secondary prevention strategies to mitigate mortality risk after ACS.

Associations between cardiac rehabilitation and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and cognitive frailty

Abstract Introduction Patients with heart failure (HF) often contend with various comorbidities, including cognitive impairment. Cognitive impairment has been increasingly recognised as cognitive frailty, which is reportedly associated with poor outcomes. On the other hand, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for HF contributes to improved clinical outcomes. However, very few reports have examined whether CR is effective in patients with HF who have cognitive frailty. Purpose The present study aimed to investigate whether CR is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with HF, even in the presence of cognitive frailty. Methods This observational study analysed 1404 consecutive patients who admitted to a university hospital for the treatment of HF and received CR during hospitalisation. Patients who had dementia, did not perform the cognitive function evaluation, or died during hospitalisation were excluded from this study. All patients were encouraged to continue outpatient CR after hospital discharge. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Cog© and a score ≤2 points was defined as the cognitive frailty. As physical function, quadriceps isometric strength (QIS) and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) were measured at the discharge and at the end of outpatient CR. The primary outcome was composite events, comprising all-cause death and re-admission due to HF. The secondary outcome was the change in physical function (ΔQIS and Δ6MWD) following outpatient CR. The association between participation in outpatient CR and composite events was assessed using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. We also compared the physical function changes between the presence or absence of cognitive frailty using analysis of covariance. Results The median age of the patients was 75 (interquartile range [IQR]: 66–81) years and 62.3% were males. Among them, 23.4% were identified as cognitive frailty. While 45.1% of overall population participated in outpatient CR, the cognitive frailty was relevant to a lower participation rate (P &amp;lt;0.001). Over a median follow-up period of 1.0 years (IQR: 0.3–2.4 years), a total of 544 composite events occurred. Participation in outpatient CR was associated with a reduced incidence of composite events in both the cognitive frailty and non-cognitive frailty, as well as in the overall patient population (Figure 1). Additionally, ΔQIS and Δ6MWD did not significantly differ between the cognitive frailty status (P = 0.655 and 0.573, respectively). Conclusions Participating in outpatient CR was linked to reduced rates of composite events and improved physical function in patients with HF, regardless of the presence or absence of cognitive frailty. Encouraging active participation in outpatient CR, even among patients with cognitive frailty, is essential as it is associated with favourable clinical outcomes.Survival analysisANCOVA

Gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation participation and outcomes: an 18-year retrospective study in Iran

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) is crucial for addressing cardiovascular diseases globally, with a specific emphasis on gender differences. Despite its demonstrated benefits for women, there's limited acceptance globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The program aims to optimize risk factors and improve overall patient well-being.MethodsA cohort study was performed on those who were candidates for CR programs during 2001–2019. Assessments were performed within one week before and one week after the 8-week CR program. Age, sex, smoking status, clinical data, resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively), echocardiography and laboratory data were obtained. Functional capacity was evaluated using the international physical activity questionnaire, and a treadmill exercise test. Anxiety, depression, general quality of life (QoL), and health-related QoL were selected for psychological status. Then statistical analysis was performed on data.ResultIn this study, the number of male patients was 1526 (73.69%). The average age of patients in the female group was higher than that of males (58.66 ± 9.08 vs. 56.18 ± 9.94), according to the crude model results, the changes in emotional, social and physical scores were significant (P-value:0.028, 0.018, 0.030), as well as the differences in Mets and smoking were significant (P-value for both < 0.001) in the adjusted model, the emotional variables and Mets changes were significant in two groups, so that the emotional score in the female group was higher than that of the male group, and the female Mets score was significantly lower than that of the male group.ConclusionThe CR program can improve cardiovascular outcomes, but the greatest impact was on the quality of life, patient METs and smoking behavers. Also the number of female participants in the CR program was less than the number of males.

Subjective fitness relates to performance and can be improved by exercise in children and young adults with heart disease.

The Duke Activity Status Index is used to assess an individual patient's perception of their fitness abilities. It has been validated and shown to predict actual fitness in adults but has been studied less in the paediatric population, specifically those with heart disease. This study aims to assess if the Duke Activity Status Index is associated with measured markers of physical fitness in adolescents and young adults with heart disease. This retrospective single-centre cohort study includes patients who completed a minimum of 12 weeks of cardiac rehabilitation between 2016 and 2022. Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes included physical, performance, and psychosocial measures. A comparison between serial testing was performed using a paired t-test. Univariable and multivariable analyses for Duke Activity Status Index were performed. Data are reported as median [interquartile range]. Of the 118 participants (20 years-old [13.9-22.5], 53% male), 33 (28%) completed at least 12 weeks of cardiac rehabilitation. Median peak oxygen consumption was 60.1% predicted [49-72.8%], and Duke Activity Status Index was 32.6 [21.5-48.8]. On Pearson's correlation assessing the Duke Activity Status Index, there were significant associations with % predicted peak oxygen consumption (r = 0.49, p < 0.0001), 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.45, p < 0.0001), Duke Activity Status Index metabolic equivalents (r = 0.45, p < 0.0001), and dominant hand grip (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, the % predicted peak oxygen consumption (r = 0.40, p = 0.005) and dominant hand grip (r = 0.37, p = 0.005) remained statistically significant. Duke Activity Status Index is associated with measures of physical fitness in paediatric and young adults with heart disease who complete a cardiac rehabilitation program.

Characteristics of longitudinal changes in quality of life and associated factors in patients post cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery: insights from a prospective cohort study

BackgroundAlthough quality of life (QOL) is an outcome of postoperative cardiac rehabilitation (CR), its course and related factors from postoperative hospitalization to the post-discharge period have not been adequately investigated. Additionally, the EuroQol-5Dimension-5Level (EQ-5D-5L) index score has not been characterized over the same period. We aimed to characterize QOL changes assessed by the EQ-5D-5L, over the period from hospitalization to 1 year post-discharge, in patients post-cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery, and investigate the factors associated with these temporal changes.MethodologyThis prospective, single-center study included 117 patients who underwent open cardiovascular surgery (median age, 72 years; men, 69%). Patients were assessed for QOL status when transferred to the general ward; at discharge; and at 6 and 12 months after discharge, using the EQ-5D-5L index score and a generalized linear mixed model with random intercepts. Patients were classified into two groups based on score changes post-discharge. Logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with QOL decrease post-discharge.ResultsThe EQ-5D-5L index score significantly increased over time, except between 6 and 12 months post-discharge; “Common activities” was the most common dimension showing score improvement. In 25 patients (21%), the EQ-5D-5L index scores were lower after discharge compared to their scores at discharge. In the logistic regression analysis, Barthel Index pre-admission, preoperative hemoglobin level, and Mini-Mental State Examination-Japanese scores pre-discharge were significantly associated with QOL decline after adjusting for the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score.ConclusionsMost patients post-cardiac or thoracic aortic surgery experienced improved QOL from postoperative hospital stay to 1 year post-discharge. However, in patients with pre-operative basic activities of daily living, hemoglobin and post-operative cognitive decline may require ongoing comprehensive CR because of reduced QOL. Given the potential selection bias introduced by the relatively small sample size in this study, future research involving larger populations is necessary.

Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes in Young Patients With CABG and STEMI

Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes in Young Patients With CABG and STEMI

Management and outcomes of heart failure hospitalization among older adults in the United States and Japan.

Despite advances in therapies, the disease burden of heart failure (HF) has been rising globally. International comparisons of HF management and outcomes may reveal care patterns that improve outcomes. Accordingly, we examined clinical management and patient outcomes in older adults hospitalized for acute HF in the United States (US) and Japan. We identified patients aged >65 who were hospitalized for HF in 2013 using US Medicare data and the Japanese Registry of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (JROADHF). We described patient characteristics, management, and healthcare utilization and compared outcomes using multivariable Cox regression during and after HF hospitalization. Among 11193 Japanese and 120289 US patients, age and sex distributions were similar, but US patients had higher comorbidity rates. The length of stay was longer in Japan (median 18 vs. 5days). While Medicare patients had higher use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy during hospitalization (1.32% vs. 0.6%), Japanese patients were more likely to receive cardiovascular medications at discharge and to undergo cardiac rehabilitation within 3months of HF admission (31% vs. 1.6%). Physician follow-up within 30days was higher in Japan (77% vs. 57%). Cardiovascular readmission, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality were 2.1-3.7 times higher in the US patients. The per-day cost of hospitalization was lower in Japan ($516 vs. $1323). We observed notable differences in the management, outcomes and costs of HF hospitalization between the USand Japan. Large differences in length of hospitalization, cardiac rehabilitation rate and outcomes warrant further research to determine the optimal length of stay and assess the benefits of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation to reduce rehospitalization and mortality.

The effect of audit and feedback and implementation support on guideline adherence and patient outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation: a study protocol for an open-label cluster-randomized effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial

Background Providing secondary prevention through structured and comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programmes to patients after a myocardial infarction (MI) reduces mortality and morbidity and improves health-related quality of life. Cardiac rehabilitation has the highest recommendation in current guidelines. While treatment target attainment rates at Swedish cardiac rehabilitation centres is among the highest in Europe, there are considerable differences in service delivery and variations in patient-level outcomes between centres. In this trial, we aim to study whether centre-level guideline adherence and patient-level outcomes across Swedish cardiac rehabilitation centres can be improved through a) regular audit and feedback of cardiac rehabilitation structure and processes through a national quality registry and b) supporting cardiac rehabilitation centres in implementing guidelines on secondary prevention. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate the implementation process and costs.MethodsThe study is an open-label cluster-randomized effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial including all 78 cardiac rehabilitation centres (attending to approximately 10 000 MI patients/year) that report to the SWEDEHEART registry. The centres will be randomized 1:1:1 to three clusters: 1) reporting cardiac rehabilitation structure and process variables to SWEDEHEART every six months (audit intervention) and being offered implementation support to implement guidelines on secondary prevention (implementation support intervention); 2) audit intervention only; or 3) no intervention offered. Baseline cardiac rehabilitation structure and process variables will be collected. The primary outcome is an adherence score measuring centre-level adherence to secondary prevention guidelines. Secondary outcomes include patient-level secondary prevention risk factor goal attainment at one-year after MI and major adverse coronary outcomes for up to five-years post-MI. Implementation outcomes include barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence evaluated using semi-structured focus-group interviews and relevant questionnaires, as well as costs and cost-effectiveness assessed by a comparative health economic evaluation.DiscussionOptimizing cardiac rehabilitation centres’ delivery of services to meet standards set in guidelines may lead to improvement in cardiovascular risk factors, including lifestyle factors, and ultimately a decrease in morbidity and mortality after MI.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05889416. Registered 2023-03-23.

The Clinical Outcome of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Regard to the Presence of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.

Background: Despite the use of advanced treatment techniques, coronary artery disease (CAD) still remains the main cause of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs can lead to a number of beneficial effects, but some patients do not demonstrate the expected improvement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of CR on changes in exercise capacity with regard to the presence of LV dysfunction. Methods: A group of 428 patients with CAD were consecutively admitted to an outpatient comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program comprising 24 exercise sessions of interval training on cycle ergometers, three times a week for 45 min, and a health education. The patients were compared in two subgroups, i.e., with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%, n = 175) and LVEF ≥ 50% (n = 253). Results: In the LVEF < 50% group, the exercise capacity improved by 1 ± 0.78 MET (median 1.15 MET), and 0.86 ± 0.77 MET (median 1.08 MET) in the LVEF ≥ 50% group. Women with LVEF < 50% demonstrated a significant increase in exercise capacity by 1.2 MET, while those with LVEF ≥ 50% did not display any such increase. All men, regardless of LVEF, exhibited a similar improvement in exercise capacity greater than 1 MET. Conclusions: An outpatient eight-week cardiac rehabilitation program based on 45 min aerobic interval training sessions three times a week appears less effective for women with CAD and EF ≥ 50%. In this group, the proposed training intervention is insufficient in improving exercise capacity to an extent that could indicate a reduction in mortality risk.

Impact of Prior COVID-19 Infections on Cardiac Rehabilitation Completion Rates and Outcomes.

This is a retrospective cohort study designed to evaluate the impact of having a prior COVID-19 infection on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) completion rates and outcomes. Participants enrolled into the CR program from June 1, 2020, to March 30, 2022. They completed both physical and mental health assessments prior to enrollment and upon completion of the program. The cohort was divided into (-) COVID and (+) COVID based on whether they self-reported a prior COVID-19 infection. Outcome measures included General Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Mental Composite Score (Short Form Health Survey-36), Physical Composite Score (Short Form Health Survey-36), and exercise capacity (reported in METs). Program completion rates and outcome measures were compared between (-) COVID and (+) COVID cohorts. A total of 806 participants were enrolled in the study. Program completion rates were 58.7% in the (-) COVID group and 67.2% in the (+) COVID group ( P = .072). African Americans ( P = .017), diabetics ( P = .017), and current smokers ( P = .003) were less likely to complete the program. Both (-) COVID and (+) COVID groups showed significant improvement in all outcome measures after completing the CR program. However, there was no difference in outcomes between groups. Having a prior COVID-19 infection did not negatively impact the mental and physical health benefits obtained by completing the CR program, regardless of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation risk category.

Goal setting among older adults starting mobile health cardiac rehabilitation in the RESILIENT trial.

There is growing recognition that healthcare should align with individuals' health priorities; however, these priorities remain undefined, especially among older adults. The Rehabilitation Using Mobile Health for Older Adults with Ischemic Heart Disease in the Home Setting (RESILIENT) trial, designed to test the efficacy of mobile health cardiac rehabilitation (mHealth-CR) in an older cohort, also measures the attainment of participant-defined health outcome goals as a prespecified secondary endpoint. This study aimed to characterize the health priorities of older adults with ischemic heart disease (IHD) using goal attainment scaling-a technique for measuring individualized goal achievement-in a sample of 100 RESILIENT participants. The ongoing RESILIENT trial randomizes patients aged ≥65 years with IHD (defined as hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary revascularization), to receive mHealth-CR or usual care. For the current study, we qualitatively coded baseline goal attainment scales from randomly selected batches of 20 participants to identify participants' cardiac rehabilitation outcome goals and their perceptions of barriers and action plans for goal attainment. We used a deductive framework (i.e., 4 value categories from Patient Priorities Care) and inductive approaches to code and analyze interviews until thematic saturation. This sample of 100 older adults set diverse health outcome goals. Most (54.6%) prioritized physical activity, fewer (17.1%) identified symptom management, fewer still (13.7%) prioritized health metrics, mostly comprised of weight loss goals (10.3%), and the fewest (<4%) were related to clinical metrics such as reducing cholesterol or preventing hospital readmission. Participants anticipated extrinsic (access to places to exercise, time) and intrinsic (non-cardiac pain, motivation) barriers. Action plans detailed strategies for exercise, motivation, accountability, and overcoming time constraints. Using goal attainment scaling, we elicited specific and measurable goals among older adults with IHD beginning cardiac rehabilitation. Priorities were predominantly functional, diverging from clinical metrics emphasized by clinicians and healthcare systems.

Anxiety Predicts Worse Cardiorespiratory Fitness Outcomes in Cardiac Rehabilitation for Lower Socioeconomic Status Patients.

The purpose of this study was to show that patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have worse clinical profiles and higher rates of psychiatric difficulties and they have lower cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) improvements from CR than their counterparts with higher SES. Improvement in CRF during CR predicts better long-term health outcomes. Research suggests that higher anxiety impairs CRF in structured exercise regimes and is overrepresented among patients with lower SES. However, no study has determined whether this relationship holds true in CR. This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial to improve CR attendance among patients with lower SES. Anxiety (ASEBA ASR; Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, Adult Self Report) and CRF measures (metabolic equivalent tasks [METs peak ]) were collected prior to CR enrollment and 4 mo later. Regression was used to examine the association of anxiety with CRF at 4 mo while controlling for other demographic and clinical characteristics. Eight-eight participants were included in the analyses, 31% of whom had clinically significant levels of anxiety ( T ≥ 63). Higher anxiety significantly predicted lower exit CRF when controlling for baseline CRF, age, sex, qualifying diagnosis, and number of CR sessions attended ( β =-.05, P = .04). Patients with clinically significant levels of anxiety could be expected to lose >0.65 METs peak in improvement. The results from this study suggest that anxiety, which is overrepresented in populations with lower SES, is associated with less CRF improvement across the duration of CR. The effect size was clinically meaningful and calls for future research on addressing psychological factor in CR.

ARE CHANGE IN METS DURING CARDIAC REHAB RELATED TO CHANGE IN PEAK VO2 AND 6MWD?

https://youtu.be/x7wTd1TmxrA BACKGROUND Change in metabolic equivalents of task (METs) during exercise training is often used as a program outcome in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The purpose of this study is to assess the correlation between the change in estimated exercise training METs during a CR program and the change in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2). METHODS This is a secondary analysis of data from the iATTEND trial- a randomized controlled trial that compared facility based CR versus hybrid CR. Subjects included in this analysis had a history of myocardial infraction, coronary revascularization, heart failure, or valve surgery and completed ≥12 sessions of CR. METs during exercise training were estimated using ACSM treadmill equations from the average of the second, third and fourth sessions of CR and the final three sessions of CR. 6MWD and peak VO2 was derived from a symptom limited graded exercise treadmill test with gas exchange were collected at baseline before starting CR and within 14 days of completing CR. Pearson correlation coefficient was determined between change in estimated exercise training METs and both change in 6MWD and in peak VO2. RESULTS The final cohort was n=237 (age=59±12 years; 35% women; 57% non-white race). The correlation between change in estimated exercise training METs and 6MWD was r=0.257, r=0.245, and r=0.235 among patients who completed ≥12 sessions of CR, ≥24 sessions of CR, and 36 sessions of CR, respectively. The correlation between change in estimated exercise training METs and peak VO2 was r=0.121, r=0.100, and r=0.136 among patients who completed ≥12 sessions of CR, ≥24 sessions of CR, and 36 sessions of CR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although change in estimated exercise training METs during a CR program, change in 6MWD, and change in peak VO2 have each been used to describe change in exercise tolerance for program outcomes, the association between these variables is low (r= &amp;lt;0.3). This finding was independent regardless of the number of sessions completed. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between the various methods of assessing change in exercise tolerance and program outcomes in CR.