Outcomes Of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Research Articles

Principles for optimizing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes in elite athletes: a review of current techniques.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common sport-related injuries and occur in greater than 3% of athletes in a four-year window of sports participation. Non-contact injuries are the most common mechanism for ACL injury in elite-level athletes, especially with increased valgus and external rotation of the knee when loading eccentrically in flexion. Because of the immense toll these injuries and their recovery take on athletes especially, optimal treatment has been a subject of great interest for some time. Many ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and repair techniques have been implemented and improved in the last two decades, leading to many surgical options for this type of injury. The surgical approach to high-level athletes in particular requires additional attention that may not be necessary in the general population. Important considerations for optimizing ACL treatment in high-level athletes include choosing repair vs. reconstruction, surgical techniques, choice of auto- or allograft, and associated concomitant procedures including other injuries or reinforcing techniques as well as attention to rehabilitation. Here, we discuss a range of surgical techniques from repair to reconstruction, and compare and contrast various reconstructive and reinforcing techniques as well as associated surgical pearls and pitfalls. Good outcomes for athletes suffering from ACL injury are attainable with proper treatment including the principles discussed herein.

Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in comparison to hamstring tendon autografts

Purpose One of the pillars of successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the choice of the ideal graft substitute. The central one-third of the quadriceps tendon is apparently a good autograft option, representing a modular reconstructive option with minimal donor site morbidity. The aim of this research is to compare the functional outcome of primary ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autografts in comparison to the hamstring tendon autograft. Patients and methods This prospective, randomized clinical study included 60 patients with torn ACL randomly divided into group I (the control group), whereby ACL reconstruction was performed using the hamstring tendon autograft or group II (the study group), whereby ACL reconstruction was done using the central part of quadriceps tendon pure soft tissue autograft. The study was performed in our hospital between January 2016 and March 2018. The mean follow-up period was 2.2 ± 0.4 years. Assessment was done clinically using the IKDC 2000 subjective and objective scoring system. Objective laxity measurements were performed using the KT-1000 at the end of follow-up. Results Clinical assessment of the patients in the 6th month postoperatively and at the end of follow-up averaged 2.2 ± 0.4 years according to the IKDC 2000 Subjective and Objective Scoring System and revealed significantly better results for group II in early postoperative after 6 months, with comparable results at the end of follow-up. Objective laxity measurements at the end of follow-up revealed that the side-to-side difference is a little bit better in the quad group with no statistically significant results. Conclusion The central part of the quadriceps tendon is a viable autograft option for primary ACL reconstruction with good mid-term functional results, and minimal donor site morbidity as compared with the standard most commonly used hamstring tendon autograft; however, a longer term and multicenter studies are still needed to validate its routine use.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis through the Modified Lemaire Technique versus Isolated ACLR: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Objective Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been proposed to resolve rotatory instability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ACLR and ACLR with LET using the modified Lemaire technique. Materials and Methods We performed a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) staement. The literature search was performed on the PubMed, EBSCOHost, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and WileyOnline databases. The data extracted from the studies included were the study characteristics, the failure rate (graft or clinical failure) as the primary outcome, and the functional score as the secondary outcome. Comparisons were made between the patients who underwent isolated ACLR (ACLR group) and those submitted to ACLR and LET through the modified Lemaire technique (ACLR + LET group). Results A total of 5 studies including 797 patients were evaluated. The ACLR + LET group presented a lower risk of failure and lower rate of rerupture than the ACLR group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.26 to 0.75; I 2 = 9%; p = 0.003). The ACLR + LET group presented higher scores on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) regarding the following outcomes: pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sports, and quality of life (QOL), with mean differences of 0.20 (95%CI: 0.10 to 0.30; I 2 = 0%; p < 0.0001), -0.20 (95%CI: -0.26 to -0.13; I 2 = 0%; p < 0.00001), 0.20 (95%CI: 0.02 to 0.38; I 2 = 0%; p = 0.03), and 0.50 (95%CI: 0.29 to 0.71; I 2 = 0%; p < 0.00001) respectively when compared with the ACLR group. Conclusion Adding LET through the modified Lemaire technique to ACLR may improve knee stability because of the lower rate of graft rerupture and the superiority in terms of clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence I.

Nonoperative Treatment as an Option for Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a risk factor for early osteoarthritis (OA) onset. Generally, ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is associated with better outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effect of operative versus nonoperative treatment for preventing premature knee OA in isolated ACL tears while achieving good functional outcomes. The purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of ACLR to primarily nonoperative management of isolated ACL tears. It was hypothesized that the outcomes between treatment types would be similar. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. This systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration No. CRD42021285901) and was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook guidelines. We systematically searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies that compared ACLR with nonoperative treatments in isolated ACL tears in 3 databases until October 25, 2021. The risk of bias and quality of evidence of the included studies was assessed in accordance with the Cochrane guidelines. The primary outcome was radiologic signs of OA, and the secondary outcomes were functional parameters. Using the common effects model, we calculated pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Five studies-2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 retrospective non-RCTs-were included. There was a moderate risk of bias in 2 studies and a serious risk of bias in 1 study. The quality of evidence was rated low because of the higher risk of bias and inconsistency. Nonoperatively treated knees showed a trend toward lower odds of developing radiological signs of OA (OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 0.90 to 3.75]); however, surgically reconstructed knees had significantly better stability (MD, -2.44 [95% CI, -3.21 to -1.66 ]) and a trend toward better but clinically not meaningful Lysholm scores (MD, 2.88 [95% CI, -1.09 to 6.85]). The qualitative synthesis showed that surgical reconstruction was protective against subsequent injuries but not superior when returning to previous activity levels or various functional tests. Findings indicated that there is no certain evidence that ACLR for an isolated ACL tear is superior to nonoperative treatment. Clinicians should consider nonoperative treatments with a well-designed rehabilitative program as a primary option. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution because of low study quality and high risk of bias.

Functional Outcome of ACL Reconstruction Following Pre-reconstruction Rehabilitation vs. None Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective The aim of this study is to analyse the needs for pre-operative rehabilitation in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Methods The database reports were searched within 2018 to 2023, using PubMed, Cochrane library database, Medline, and other published trials. A statistical analysis was made from Review Manager. Results Pre-operative rehabilitation group shows significantly higher 2 years post-operative KOOS score in all subscore and the total mean of the score, pain (p < 0. 0001), symptoms (p < 0. 0001), ADL (p < 0. 0001), sports and recreations (p < 0. 0001), QoL (p < 0. 0001), and the total mean of the KOOS score (p < 0.0001). In contrary, pre-operative rehabilitation group shows insignificantly higher score on 3 months post-operative Lysholm score (p = 0.12). Conclusion This meta-analysis conclude pre-operative rehabilitation may provide better long-term post-operative outcome, however it may not provide much of a short-term outcome. It is recommended to add pre-operative rehabilitation as a guideline for ACL injury management to improve long-term outcome of patients with ACL injury undergoing ACL reconstruction procedure.

Impacts of Segond Fractures on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.

Segond fractures, characterized by avulsion injuries at the lateral tibial condyle's anterolateral structure (ALS) attachment, often coincide with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, potentially leading to knee instability. However, the influence of Segond fractures on knee stability after ACL reconstruction remains uncertain. Despite documented ALS reconstructions, there is a lack of consensus regarding the assessment of ALS failure and the criteria for surgical interventions. This study aimed to determine if Segond fracture presence impacts ACL reconstruction outcomes, utilizing patient-reported subjective assessments and healthcare providers' objective evaluations. This retrospective study encompassed 639 patients (328 males, 311 females; mean age 26.9 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction, with a follow-up of at least one year. Subjects were divided into two groups: Segond fractures diagnosed through radiographic findings (Group S+, n = 17) and no Segond fractures (Group S-, n = 622). Clinical evaluation included the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36), Lysholm score, visual analog scale (VAS) for knee pain, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and knee instability assessment via Telos SE (Telos Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Statistical comparisons were performed between the two groups. At the final follow-up, all SF-36 subscales improved in all eight subscales compared to before surgery, reaching national standard scores; no significant inter-group differences were evident. Lysholm scores were 93.0 ± 12.1 (Group S+) and 91.7 ± 10.9 (Group S-) (P = 0.62), VAS for knee pain was 10.0 ± 18.0 (Group S+) and 11.9 ± 16.9 (Group S-) (P = 0.62), total KOOS was 89.0 ± 17.4 (Group S+) and 90.7 ± 9.9 (Group S-) (P = 0.39), and anterior tibial translation differences were 2.8 ± 3.0 mm (Group S+) and 2.7 ± 2.9 mm (Group S-) (P = 0.73). All these values represent postoperative measurements. No significant discrepancies existed between groups across evaluation methods. This study's results suggest that Segond fractures have minimal impact on clinical ACL reconstruction outcomes, as assessed through both patient-reported subjective evaluations and objective healthcare provider evaluations. Segond fractures' significance in postoperative outcomes questions the necessity of ALS reconstruction.

Delayed Meniscus Repair Lowers the Functional Outcome of Primary ACL Reconstruction.

Our purpose was to evaluate whether the time of intervention and the type of meniscus surgery (repair vs. partial meniscectomy) play a role in managing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with concurrent meniscus pathologies. We performed a prospective cohort study which differentiated between early and late ACL reconstructions with a cut-off at 3 months. Patients were re-evaluated after 2 years. Thirty-nine patients received an operation between 2-12 weeks after the injury, and thirty patients received the surgery between 13-28 weeks after trauma. The strongest negative predictive factor of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form in a hierarchical regression model was older age (ß = -0.49 per year; 95% CI [-0.91; -0.07]; p = 0.022; partial R2 = 0.08)). The strongest positive predictive factor was a higher preoperative Tegner score (ß = 3.6; 95% CI [0.13; 7.1]; p = 0.042; partial R2 = 0.07) and an interaction between meniscus repair surgery and the time of intervention (ß = 27; 95% CI [1.6; 52]; p = 0.037; partial R2 = 0.07), revealing a clinical meaningful difference as to whether meniscus repairs were performed within 12 weeks after trauma or were delayed. There was no difference whether partial meniscectomy was performed early or delayed. Surgical timing plays a crucial role when surgeons opt for a meniscus repair rather than for a meniscectomy.

The Psychology of ACL Injury, Treatment, and Recovery: Current Concepts and Future Directions.

Interest in the relationship between psychology and the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) continues to grow as variable rates of return to preinjury level of activity continue to be observed. Articles were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on PubMed using a combination of search terms, including psychology, resilience, mental health, recovery, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Further evaluation of the included bibliographies were used to expand the evidence. Clinical review. Level 4. General mental health and wellbeing, in addition to a host of unique psychological traits (self-efficacy, resilience, psychological readiness and distress, pain catastrophizing, locus of control, and kinesiophobia) have been demonstrated convincingly to affect treatment outcomes. Moreover, compelling evidence suggests that a number of these traits may be modifiable. Although the effect of resilience on outcomes of orthopaedic surgical procedures has been studied extensively, there is very limited information linking this unique psychological trait to the outcomes of ACLR. Similarly, the available information related to other parameters, such as pain catastrophizing, is limited with respect to the existence of adequately sized cohorts capable of accommodating more rigorous and compelling analyses. A better understanding of the specific mechanisms through which psychological traits influence outcomes can inform future interventions intended to improve rates of return to preinjury level of activity after ACLR. The impact of psychology on patients' responses to ACL injury and treatment represents a promising avenue for improving low rates of return to preinjury activity levels among certain cohorts. Future research into these areas should focus on specific effects of targeted interventions on known, modifiable risk factors that commonly contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes. B.

Functional Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Nine-Month Follow-up Study Using Lysholm Score in a Rural Tertiary Care Center in India.

Introduction The knee joint, an extraordinary feat of biomechanics, is prone to injuries, with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) often being a common victim. The intricate coordination of joint movements relies heavily on the ACL's screw-home mechanism, a crucial element for synchronizing knee movement with neighboring joints. Despite its indispensable role, the ACL is susceptible to injury, necessitating surgical intervention. While many patients experience positive outcomes following ACL reconstruction surgeries, a significant proportion face the challenge of procedure failure. The key to success lies in the healing process within the tibial and femoral bone tunnels. The post-ACL reconstruction phase introduces its own set of challenges, particularly in the context of returning to sports (RTS), underscoring the importance of reinstating neuromuscular and motor function. The trajectory of rehabilitation is influenced by factors such as graft healing, patient age, gender, pain levels, and concurrent injuries. Materials and methods This prospective observational study spanned 2.5 years, enrolling 71 patients with diagnosed ACL injuries. Arthroscopic reconstruction utilized hamstring autografts and peroneus longus autografts. A nine-month post-surgery follow-up employed the Lysholm scoring system for comprehensive evaluations. Results Over 2.5 years, 87.3% of male and 12.6% of female participants underwent arthroscopic reconstruction. Lysholm scores revealed 28.1% excellent, 45.0% good, and 26.7% fair outcomes, with no participants in the unsatisfactory range. Lysholm scores demonstrated positive outcomes, indicating the efficacy of arthroscopic reconstruction in enhancing knee function. Findings align with existing literature, emphasizing positive results from ACL reconstruction techniques and specific implants. Comparisons with related studies highlight challenges in standardized return-to-sport guidelines and underscore the need for outcome measure standardization. Conclusion The study contributes nuanced insights into ACL reconstruction outcomes, emphasizing positive functional recovery trends at the nine-month follow-up. Lysholm scores indicate favorable outcomes, supporting the procedure's effectiveness. Consideration of specific implants adds practical value. Despite limitations, this study enriches ACL reconstruction research, promoting advancements in patient care and outcomes. Ongoing research with extended follow-ups and larger cohorts will enhance understanding and refine ACL reconstruction strategies.

The Influence of Psychosocial Factors on Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries greatly impact patients in terms of future performance, reduced physical activity and athletic participation, and overall economic burden. Decades of research have investigated how to improve ACL reconstruction (ACLR) outcomes. Recently, there has been growing interest to understand the effects of psychosocial factors on patient outcomes. Clinical review. A search of the PubMed database was performed in March 2023. Articles were reviewed by at least 2 authors to determine relevance. We highlighted publications of the past 5 years while incorporating previous pertinent studies. Level 5. There is no standardization of psychosocial factors regarding ACLR. As such, there is a lack of consensus regarding which psychosocial measures to use and when. There is a need for clarification of the complex relationship between psychosocial factors and physical function. Despite this, psychosocial factors have the potential to help predict patients who are more likely to return to sport: (1) desire/motivation to return; (2) lower levels of kinesiophobia; (3) higher levels of self-efficacy, confidence, and subjective knee function; (4) risk acceptance; and (5) social support. However, there are no standardized interventions to improve psychosocial factors after ACLR. Psychosocial factors affect outcomes after ACLR. However, the interplay between psychosocial factors and physical function is complex. There is emerging evidence that testing and interventions may improve ACLR outcomes. There is a lack of standardized interventions to determine or improve psychosocial factors after ACLR. Further research is needed to identify psychosocial factors and to develop standardized interventions for clinicians to implement to improve clinical outcomes.

A Lateral Extra-articular Procedure Reduces the Failure Rate of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Without Increasing Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Lateral extra-articular procedures are becoming increasingly popular in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, especially in patients with persistent rotatory instability and in a high-risk population. However, few studies have investigated the outcomes of the lateral extra-articular procedure as an associated procedure in an ACL revision (R-ACLR) setting and its benefit with respect to isolated intra-articular reconstruction. Hypothesis: Lateral extra-articular procedures reduce the failure rate of revision ACL reconstruction (R-ACLR). Purpose: To compare subjective outcomes, knee stability, and failure and complication rates between patients who underwent ACL revision with and without an associated lateral extra-articular procedure. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and OVID databases was performed on September 2022 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies were trials directly comparing patients who had isolated ACL revision with patients who had ACL revision associated with lateral extra-articular procedures at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A meta-analysis was performed, and bias and the quality of the evidence were rated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Eight studies were included: a total of 334 patients were treated with isolated revision (isolated (R-ACLR)) and 342 treated with combined revision and a lateral extra-articular procedure (combined (R-ACLR)). For the failure rate, the meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased relative risk reduction of 54% (P = .004) in patients with combined (R-ACLR) with respect to isolated R-ACL, whereas no difference in complication rate was observed. The combined (R-ACLR) group demonstrated a decreased risk ratio of 50% (P = .002) for having a positive pivot-shift test result and a relative risk reduction of 68% (P = .003) for having a grade 2-3 pivot shift when compared with the isolated (R-ACLR) group. Finally, no significant differences were observed among the lateral extra-articular procedures. Conclusion: The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure to revision ACL significantly reduced the failure rate and postoperative pivot shift without increasing the complication rate. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction and a lateral extra-articular procedure with iliotibial band were effective in improving the outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction. Further high-level studies could help to clarify which subgroup of patients could particularly benefit from an anterolateral procedure in the context of ACL revision.

Remnant-Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Results in Similar Clinical, Functional, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes to Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

To compare a large cohort of patients who underwent remnant-sparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) with a matched group of patients who underwent anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with respect to clinical laxity, patient-reported outcomes, and functional testing. Patients who underwent rACLR between January 2010 and December 2015 were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, and graft type to patients who underwent ACLR. The primary outcome measure was the ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) score at final follow-up of 24 months. Secondary outcomes included functional tests and clinical laxity measurements at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Concurrent intra-articular pathology at the time of surgery and postoperative complications were also recorded. Statistical analyses included the dependent t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A total of 210 rACLR patients were successfully matched to a corresponding cohort of 210 ACLR patients. There were no statistically significant differences in ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) or functional testing results between the groups; however, scores in both groups showed a steady and statistically significant improvement over time. A statistically significant difference was noted with respect to the Lachman test findings, favoring the rACLR cohort (Z= -2.79, P= .005); no between-group difference was seen for the pivot-shift test (Z= -0.36, P= .72). The rACLR group had a significantly lower rate of concurrent meniscal and chondral injury. There was no difference in complications between the groups (Z= -0.49, P= .63). There was no difference in patient-reported or functional testing outcomes in patients undergoing remnant-sparing compared with anatomic single-bundle ACLR. There was, however, a significantly lower rate of positive Lachman test findings after rACLR. Furthermore, the rate of concurrent meniscal and chondral pathology was lower in the rACLR group. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Evaluation of Long-term Outcome of Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury by Hamstring quadrupled Auto graft fixed by Bio Screws in a tertiary level hospital

Background: Hamstring tendon auto grafts in the form of quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis (STG) has become an increasingly used alternative for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Bio screw avoids complications by decreasing possibility of graft damage. Current study was designed to evaluate arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus auto graft and fixation of the graft by two biodegradable screws in both femur and tibia.&#x0D; Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction by semitendinosus tendon autograft using biodegradable screws for both tibia and femur. Methods: 300 patients with ACL injury admitted from January 2010 to December 2015 in the then Apollo Hospitals Dhaka (Evercare Hospital Dhaka now) were enrolled. All patients underwent ACL reconstruction surgery by quadrupled semitendinosus or gracilis auto graft fixed by Bio Screws. After discharge, these patients were followed up for 3 weeks, 3 months and final outcome was recorded after 6 years.&#x0D; Results: 270 patients (90%) had an uneventful post-operative period. 200 patients (66.67%) complained of postoperative pain after 3 weeks, 10 patients (3.33%) complained of knee swelling, 10 (3.33%) patients had infections &amp; 20 patients (6.65%) had knee stiffness after 6 months. Postoperatively, Lachman test improved significantly, grade 0 in 93.33% cases (280 patients) and grade I was in 6.67% cases (20 patients). Anterior drawer test was also markedly improved. Grade 0 was in 93.33% cases (280 patients) and grade I was in 6.67% cases (20 patients). According to the Lysholm Knee Scoring, the final long-term outcome was excellent in 76.67% cases (230 patients), good in 20% cases (60 patients) and fair in 3.33% cases (10 patients).&#x0D; Conclusion: Arthroscopic reconstruction of ACL by quadrupled hamstring autograft fixed by biodegradable screws for both tibia and femur, leads good to excellent results in the majority of the cases.&#x0D; Pulse Vol.15, 2023 P: 9-15

THE COURSE OF SEPTIC ARTHRITIS FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: INFECTIOUS AGENTS, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, AND TREATMENT: A CASE SERIES OF 158 PATIENTS

Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a rare and serious complication. Previous studies have shown that septic arthritis is associated with inferior outcome of ACLR. Despite that, there is no standardized treatment protocol, and the course of the disease has mainly been studied within single institutions with a small number of patients.The aim of the present study is to describe the course of septic arthritis following ACLR in a large nationwide cohort. The hypothesis was that the clinical presentation of septic arthritis following ACLR varies according to the infectious agent.The present cohort represents patients with septic arthritis identified in a previous study that analyzed compensation claims reported to the Swedish national insurance company (Löf) in 2005–2014 (1). The diagnosis was confirmed by medical experts at Löf after review of medical records. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the medical records as well as data available from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry (SNKLR) for the study group.The study involved 158 patients who received compensation due to developing septic arhtirits. 94 (59.9%) patients were infected with Coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS), and 25 patients by Staphyolococcus Aureus (S.Aureus) (15.9%). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding Maximum CRP (p&lt;0.001), and duration between ACLR and first washout operation (p&lt;0.005). S.aureus group had the higest maximum CRP (281) and the shortest duration between ACLR and first washout operation (12 days).The Clinical presentation of septic arthritis following ACLR can vary according to the agent causing the infection, and low virulent agents are responsible for the majority of the infections. Clinicians need to be aware of these differences and consider them when making diagnosis or treatment decisions.

Outcomes of combined ACL reconstruction and open wedge HTO: a systematic review

The deterioration of knee structures is enhanced by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, which also can lead to osteoarthritis following a series of events. Additionally, untreated ACL insufficiency can lead to varus malalignment. ACL reconstruction can achieve the stability of the knee and restrict the osteoarthritis progression. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an intervention for the correction of varus malalignment in the lower extremity. HTO efficacy has been extended for the management of ACL-deficient varus knees. The combination of ACL reconstruction with HTO may result in better outcomes. The present review aimed at assessing the outcomes of ACL reconstruction and open wedge HTO combination. Scientific databases were explored for related studies published after 2015 and using a set of keywords for the searching process. Eligible criteria of the included studies were original articles written in the English language, reporting a combination of ACL reconstruction and open wedge HTO available for full text. A total of eight articles were included as they met the determined criteria. The total number of patients was 163 cases with an age range of 18 years and less than 70 years. The follow-up period was between 12 months and 10 years. The combination of ACL reconstruction and open wedge HTO resulted in favorable outcomes. However, there were few complications and a low rate of failure.

Functional outcome and single hop test results of ACL reconstruction in athletes at a follow-up of 6 and 12 months: modified all-inside versus conventional hamstring autograft

reconstruction (ACLR) is a surgical treatment orthopedists perform. This study aims to compare the 6 and 12 months post-op results of single leg hop tests (SLHT) performed in multidirectional conventional semitendinosus/gracilis (ST/G) and modified all inside (MAI) ACLR techniques on both sides and the limb symmetry indexes (LSI) of both techniques. This study evaluated a retrospective cohort of 50 male athletes who applied MAI (n = 23) and traditional ACLR ST/G (n = 27) techniques. Functional knee strength of the participants on both sides was measured with different SLHTs at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The SLHT included medial side (MSTH), triple hop (TH), medial rotation (90◦) (MRH), crossover triple (CH) ve the single hop (SH) hop for distance. Both ACLR techniques showed significant improvement in mean Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (p &lt; 0.05). For MAI and ST/G techniques, there was no significant difference in the results of SLHTs at 6 and 12 months for both the operated and non-operated sides (p &lt; 0.05). Significance was found only in the MRH test of the non-operated side (p &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in SLHT scores between the operated and non-operated sides at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (p &gt; 0.05). There was no difference in LSI scores between techniques (p &lt; 0.05). Our study revealed similar LSI rates in ST/G and MAI techniques at 6 and 12 months, suggesting that MAI technique can be used as a functional ACLR technique for athletes.

Short-term results of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction using a novel hamstrings graft construct in obese patients: a pilot study

Abstract Background Elevated body mass index (BMI) was associated with increased complication rates including failures in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. We present our short-term results of our technique used for ACL reconstruction in obese patients with the aim to reduce chances for graft failure and improve outcomes. Patients and methods We present our case series of obese patients (BMI &gt; 30) operated for ACL reconstruction during the period from January 2017 to January 2022 using a dedicated technique for ACL reconstruction. We are using hamstring tendons prepared in a single construct to reconstruct both the intra-articular ACL and the anterolateral ligament. All patients received the same surgical technique and associated injuries were operated on according to their indications and guidelines. All patients completed the subjective knee evaluation form of the International Knee Documentation Committee at the time of the procedure and at the last follow-up visit and assessment of knee laxity was performed using a KT-1000 arthrometer before the surgery and at the last follow-up. Results Twenty patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using this technique during the study period, with average follow-up period of 1 year. All cases were males, mean BMI was 32.2 (30.4–36.2), 18 cases were operated on using ipsilateral Semitendinosus and Gracilis grafts, 2 cases were operated on using contralateral knee hamstrings. All cases were instructed nonweight bearing for 6 weeks after surgery and received the same standard accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Two cases developed postoperative superficial wound infection at the graft harvest site that resolved with conservative treatment of oral antibiotics and wound care. The mean postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score improved from 45.195 to 79.245 (P&lt;0.001), and the mean KT-1000 arthrometer differential improved from 11.8 to 2.77 (P&lt;0.001) and pivot shift tests were negative in the postoperative exam for all the cases. Conclusion ACLR in obese patients should be approached with care, our technique can offer a feasible solution to obtain an acceptable outcome, Further work is required to provide insight on the long-term outcome of ACLR in obese patients.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Bone-Tendon-Bone Allograft: Surgical Technique Using Augmentation with Bio-Composite Scaffold

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture rates remain high; the incidence of isolated ACL ruptures is 68.6 per 100,000. This Technical Note introduces a technique for ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-tendon-bone (BTB) allograft augmented with BioBrace, a biocomposite scaffold. The BioBrace scaffold is sutured onto the BTB allograft to reinforce the ligament and accelerate healing. Graft preparation with BioBrace, ACLR, and graft passage is described. This technique aims to reduce re-rupture risk, enhance graft healing, and improve patient-reported outcomes. BioBrace offers advantages over other augmentation approaches and synthetic materials, providing improved remodeling, biologic integration, and increased mechanical strength. Feasibility and efficacy have been demonstrated in animal models and human applications. This technique presents a promising approach to enhance ACLR outcomes.

THE ALL-INSIDE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH FIBER-LOOP AUGMENTATION

Objectives: To evaluate the functional outcomes in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with fiber-loop augmented to reinforce the ligament, acting as a secondary stabilizer. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 25 patients who underwent the all-inside ACL reconstruction with the addition of fiber-loop inside the ACL graft in the Department of Joint Surgery, Military Hospital 103, from August 2022 to August 2023. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and finally post-operatively via the Lachman test, Pivot shift test, and Lysholm score. Results: The mean follow-up was 9.84 months; the mean age was 33.04 ± 9.95 years. 24 patients (96%) were post-operatively Lachman negative. The pivot-shift test showed 96% of patients absent or glide after surgery. The Lysholm knee score at the last visit was good and very good in 96% of the patients; the mean score was 92.56 ± 4,53. Conclusion: This study showed good functional outcomes of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with fiber-loop augmentation to reinforce the ligamental graft. There is a need for more comparative studies with longer follow-ups and large sample sizes.

A comparative analysis of suture-augmented and standard hamstring autograft single-bundle ACL reconstruction outcomes: short-term functional benefits without long-term impact

BackgroundAugmentation of the biologic graft with nonabsorbable suture material during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a relatively new technique to enhance its biomechanical properties and add additional support to the critical process of healing. We aimed to compare the short-term functional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication rates of patients treated with either standard single-bundle four-strand hamstring ACLR or added suture augmentation (SA).MethodsPatients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR between February 2015-January 2017 and in the standard ACLR group, and between February 2017-September 2019 in the SA-ACLR group operated by adding a no.5 FiberWire® (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) braided suture to the hamstring autograft, were retrospectively reviewed and the PROMs were compared. Patients were followed up for a 24-month period and PROMs were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and Tegner-Lysholm knee score. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, and postoperative complications including graft retear requiring revision surgery, deep vein thrombois, and surgical site infection were recorded and analyzed.ResultsWe included 79 patients with mean age of 31.6 ± 8.3 years in the standard ACLR group, and 90 patients with mean oge of 30.5 ± 7.6 in the SA-ACLR group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and medical comorbidities. The values of the IKDC scores increased to 75.8 ± 18.9 in the standard ACLR group, and 85.6 ± 12.6 in the SA-ACLR group, 24 months after the operation (P < 0.05). The 24-month postoperative Tegner-Lysholm scores escalated to 79.3 ± 21.0 in the standard ACLR group and 91.0 ± 13.7 in the SA-ACLR group (P < 0.05). Four (5.1%) patients in the standard ACLR group and 4 (4.4%) in the SA-ACLR group experienced graft retear requiring revision surgery (P > 0.05). Incidence of surgical site infection and deep vein thrombosis showed no significant differences between the two groups, 24 months after ACLR.ConclusionSA-ACLR is associated with improved short-term functional PROMs compared to the standard hamstring ACLR. Although SA did not reduce the retear rate, and infection and DVT rates did not differ between study groups, superior improvement of PROMs in SA approach, leverages this method for ACLR.