Outcome Of Retransplantation Research Articles

Kidney Retransplantation in the Ipsilateral Iliac Fossa: A Surgical Challenge

The aim of this study is to review the surgical outcome of kidney retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa in comparison to first kidney transplants. The database was screened for retransplantations between 1995 and 2013. Each study patient was matched with 3 patients with a first kidney transplantation. Just for graft and patient survival analyses, we added an extra control group including all patients receiving a second transplantation in the contralateral iliac fossa. We identified 99 patients who received a retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa. There was significantly more blood loss and longer operative time in the retransplantation group. The rate of vascular complications and graft nephrectomies within 1 year was significantly higher in the study group. The graft survival rates at 1 year and 3, 5, and 10 years were 76%, 67%, 61%, and 47% in the study group versus 94%, 88%, 77%, and 67% (p < 0.001) in the first control group versus 91%, 86%, 78%, and 57% (p = 0.008) in the second control group. Patient survival did not differ significantly between the groups. Kidney retransplantation in ipsilateral iliac fossa is surgically challenging and associated with more vascular complications and graft loss within the first year after transplantation. Whenever feasible, the second renal transplant (first retransplant) should be performed contralateral to the prior failed one.

Live Inclusion Improves Outcomes of Intestinal Retransplantation in Adults

Live Inclusion Improves Outcomes of Intestinal Retransplantation in Adults

Liver inclusion improves outcomes of intestinal retransplantation in adults. [Corrected

Retransplantation is a viable treatment option for patients with primary intestinal graft loss. We analyzed outcomes of retransplantations (n = 23) in adults from May 2000 to May 2010 at our center and compared patients who received liver-free retransplantations (n = 13) with those who received liver-inclusive retransplantations (n = 10). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in retransplantations were 90.9%, 67.1%, and 59.7% (patient) and 82.2%, 58.6%, and 51.3% (graft), respectively, which were similar to the rates in primary transplants. The patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.7%, 55.6%, and 41.7%, respectively, in liver-free retransplantations, as compared to rates of 90.0%, 80.0%, and 80.0% in liver-inclusive retransplantations. The graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in liver-free retransplantations were 76.2%, 40.6%, and 27.1%, respectively, which were significantly worse than those in liver-inclusive retransplantations (P = 0.03). Within an average follow-up of 32.3 months, 8 of 13 (61.5%) of liver-free retransplantations underwent enterectomy because of severe acute cellular rejection (n = 3) or chronic rejection (n = 5). Six of 13 (46.2%) recipients succumbed to rejection-related complications. Compared to liver-free retransplantations, the rate and severity of acute rejection were markedly de creased in liver-inclusive retransplantations, and no chronic rejection was seen. Within an average follow-up of 44.5 months, two of 10 (20%) died due to graft-versus-host disease and infection, respectively. A liver-inclusive retransplantation offers a better long-term patient and graft survival, suggesting that including the liver as part of an intestinal graft should be considered in adult recipients when retransplantation is necessary.

(102) - Impact of Repeated Mismatch Human Leukocyte Antigen on the Outcome of Lung Retransplantation

(102) - Impact of Repeated Mismatch Human Leukocyte Antigen on the Outcome of Lung Retransplantation

Outcome and Technical Aspects of Liver Retransplantation: Analysis of 25-Year Experience in a Single Major Center

BackgroundThe need for liver retransplantation (re-LT) has been increasing. Here we describe the outcome and technical aspects of re-LT during 25 years in a single major center. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LT from March 1988 to February 2013. Among 1,312 LTs during 25 years, 38 (2.9%) were re-LTs, including 28 adults (mean age 52.0 y) and 10 children (mean age 5.7 y). ResultsThe most common indication was primary nonfunction in early re-LT and biliary complication in late re-LT. Preoperative major comorbidity was very common (81.6%). Among them, infection was the most frequent (52.6%). Living-donor re-LT constituted 21.1%. In operative technique, nonconventional methods were substantially performed, including high hilar dissection for hepatectomy (>50%), arterial anastomosis with the use of right gastroepiploic or jump graft (23.7%), and hepaticoenterostomy (60.5%). Several reanastomoses were needed in 10.5% for artery and 5.3% for duct. In adults and children, mean estimated blood losses were 9,541 mL and 977 mL, respectively. Mean operative times for adults and children were 508 and 432 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 35.7% in adults and 40.0% in children. The main cause of death was sepsis for both adults and children. Survival rates at 1 month and 1, 3, and 5 years were, respectively, 89.4%, 56.5%, 50.3%, and 50.3% in adults, and 70.0%, 60.0%, 60.0%, and 60.0% in children. ConclusionsOutcome of re-LT is poorer than primary LT regardless of the cause of graft failure. Therefore, more technical concerns need to be considered. We also need more efforts to control perioperative infections to improve survival after re-LT.

Outcomes of pancreas retransplantation after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation are comparable to pancreas after kidney transplantation alone.

There is a paucity of contemporary data describing the results of pancreas retransplantation (PRT). As a measure of utility, we wished to determine whether PRT could produce equivalent short-term and long-term recipient outcomes to primary pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation. Retrospective analysis of 96 consecutive pancreas only transplants performed from 2003 to May 2012. Primary PAK transplants (n = 78) were compared to PRT (n=18). Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Pancreas graft survival was similar for PAK and PRT at 1 year (88.2% vs. 100%) and 3 years (85.1% vs. 85.1%). Pancreas graft failure occurred in 14 PAK and two PRT patients with a mean follow-up of 61.6 ± 38.7 and 37.8 ± 26.1 months, respectively. There were no differences in postoperative length of stay (9.9 days vs. 8.7 days; P = 0.9) or postoperative complications in the first 3 months (47.4% vs. 38.9%, P = 0.6). At 3-year follow-up, both groups had comparable HBA1c (0.06 vs. 0.05; P = 0.8), serum creatinine (116.6 μmol/L v 131.7 μmol/L; P = 0.09), and oral glucose tolerance tests. Pancreas retransplantation is a safe and effective therapy for select recipients after graft loss. Pancreas retransplantation is associated with the same risk of postoperative complications and has similar intermediate-term graft survival compared to primary PAK transplantation.

Gene expression profiling to study racial differences after heart transplantation

BackgroundThe basis for increased mortality after heart transplantation in African Americans and other non-Caucasian racial groups is poorly defined. We hypothesized that increased risk of adverse events is driven by biological factors. To test this hypothesis in the IMAGE study, we determined whether the event rate of the primary outcome of acute rejection, graft dysfunction, death, or re-transplantation varied by race as a function of calcineurin inhibitor levels and gene expression profile (GEP) scores.MethodsWe determined the event rate of the primary outcome, comparing racial groups, stratified by time post-transplant. Logistic regression was used to compute the relative risk across racial groups and linear modeling was used to measure the dependence of CNI levels and GEP score on race.ResultsIn 580 patients followed for a median of 19 months, the incidence of the primary endpoint in African Americans, other non-Caucasians, and Caucasians was 18.3%, 22.2%, and 8.5%, respectively (p<0.001). There were small but significant correlations of race and tacrolimus trough levels to GEP score. Tacrolimus levels were similar between races. Of patients receiving tacrolimus, other non-Caucasians had higher GEP scores than the other racial groups. African American recipients demonstrated a unique decrease in expression of the FLT3 gene in response to higher tacrolimus levels.ConclusionsAfrican Americans and other non-Caucasian heart transplant recipients were 2.5–3 times more likely than Caucasians to experience outcome events in IMAGE. The increased risk of adverse outcomes may be partly due to the biology of the alloimmune response, which is less effectively inhibited at similar tacrolimus levels in minority racial groups.

Racial disparities in wait-list outcomes for heart re-transplantation in the United States

Hayanga, Awori J. MD; Aboagye, Jonathan MD; Kaiser, Heather E. MD, MPH; Huffman, Lynn MD; Dickinson, Michael MD; Bhama, Jay K. MD; Khaghani, Asghar MD Author Information

Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Cardiac Retransplantation: A single center experience

Cardiac retransplantation is increasing in frequency. Recent data have shown that retransplantation outcomes are now comparable with primary transplantation. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to retransplantation has similar post-retransplant outcomes to those without MCS, but the success of bridging patients to retransplant with MCS has not been well studied. From January 2000 to February 2014 at Columbia University Medical Center, 84 patients were listed for retransplantation. Of this cohort, 48 patients underwent retransplantation, 15 were bridged with MCS, 24 died, and 6 clinically improved. A retrospective analysis was performed examining waiting list time, survival to retransplantation, and survival after retransplant. The effect of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation policy change in 2006 on waiting list time and MCS use was also investigated. Of 48 patients who underwent retransplantation, 11 were bridged with MCS. Overall 1-year survival to retransplantation was 81.3%. There was no significant difference in waiting list survival (p = 0.71) in those with and without MCS. Death from cardiac arrest or multiorgan failure with infection was more frequent in the medically managed group (p = 0.002). After the UNOS 2006 allocation policy change, waiting list time (599 ± 936 days in Era 1 vs 526 ± 498 days in Era 2, p = 0.65) and waiting list survival (p = 0.22) between eras were comparable, but there was a trend toward greater use of MCS (p = 0.13). Survival after retransplant was acceptable. The use of MCS as a bridge to cardiac retransplantation is a reasonable strategy.

Kidney Retransplantation: Removal or Persistence of the Previous Failed Allograft?

A significant percentage of patients with failed renal graft are candidates for retransplantation. The outcomes of retransplantation are poorer than those of primary transplantation and sensitization is documented to be a major reason. The management of a failed allograft that is not immediately symptomatic is still very controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the failed allograft nephrectomy on a subsequent transplantation and its importance in the sensitization. We performed a retrospective analysis of the local prospective transplantation registry of the outcome of 126 second kidney transplantations among 2438 transplantations performed in our unit between June 1980 and March 2013, comparing those who underwent allograft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation with those who retained the failed graft. Primary endpoints were graft and patient survival. The levels of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) and rate of acute rejections on retransplantation outcomes were also studied. Among the 126 patients who underwent a second renal transplantation, 76 (60.3%) had a prior graft nephrectomy (Group A), whereas 50 (39.7%) kept their failed graft (Group B). Group A showed significantly more positive PRA levels when compared with the other group (38% vs 10%; P < .001), as measured before the most recent transplantation, and a higher rate of acute rejection (19% vs 5.6%; P = .016). There were 28 (36%) renal allograft losses for Group A and 18 (36%) for those who had not had transplantectomy (P = not significant [NS]). One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 96.6%, 90.7%, and 83.4%, respectively, in Group A and 95%, 82%, and 68.4%, respectively, in Group B, with no statistical differences (P = .19). Five-year actuarial patient survival rates in the 2 groups was 89.3% and 82.8%, respectively (P = .55). Multivariate analysis showed that PRA level and delayed graft function (DGF) had a statistically significant influence on graft survival (P = .028; odds ratio [OR] = 1.029; and P = .024; OR = 8.6), irrespective of whether the patient had graft nephrectomy or not. The allosensitization indicated by PRA increases after transplantectomy and leads to a higher incidence of acute rejection after retransplantation. Nephrectomy of failed allograft does not seem to significantly influence the survival of a subsequent graft. The decision to remove or retain a failed graft in the context of retransplantation should thus be based on known clinical indications for the procedure.

Survival, Morbidity, Sensitisation and Retransplantation Outcomes in a Cohort of Dialysis Patients After Renal Graft Loss Treated at a Single Centre With Protocolised Immunotherapy and Graft Nephrectomy By Indication.

Survival, Morbidity, Sensitisation and Retransplantation Outcomes in a Cohort of Dialysis Patients After Renal Graft Loss Treated at a Single Centre With Protocolised Immunotherapy and Graft Nephrectomy By Indication.

Outcomes of Pancreas Retransplantation.

Outcomes of Pancreas Retransplantation.

Retransplantation using living‐donor right‐liver grafts

This study reviews the outcomes of retransplantation using living-donor right-liver grafts. A retrospective study of liver retransplants performed between 1996 and 2013 was conducted. The retransplants were divided into the DD group (with deceased donors) and the LD group (with living donors). Survival outcomes were analyzed. The DD group contained 23 patients and 27 retransplants using whole-liver grafts and the LD group contained 11 patients and 11 retransplants using right-liver grafts. Vascular and biliary complications were the main indications for retransplantation in both groups. The LD group had significantly younger donors, lighter grafts, shorter cold ischemia and longer operations. The two groups were comparable in age, preoperative liver function, warm ischemia, blood loss, transfusion, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, hospital mortality, complication and graft loss. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 78.3%, 73.7% and 63.8%, respectively, in the DD group. The LD group had the corresponding rates all at 90.9% (P = 0.246). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 74.1%, 65.8% and 61.5%, respectively, in the DD group. The LD group had the corresponding rates all at 90.9% (P = 0.132). Excellent long-term survival after retransplantation using living-donor right-liver grafts can be achieved.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcome Of Leukemia Relapses Due To Loss Of The Mismatched HLA Haplotype After Partially-Incompatible Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

▪ IntroductionAllogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) represents the best curative option for many patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies, mainly due to its potent immuno-mediated antileukemic effect. Still, post-transplantation relapse remains an unsolved issue. We and others described genomic loss of the mismatched HLA haplotype as a mechanism by which leukemic cells evade donor T cell-mediated immune pressure and cause clinical relapse after partially HLA-incompatible HSCT (Vago et al, N Engl JMed, 2009), but the actual incidence and risk factors of this phenomenon are to date largely unknown. MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively 224 consecutive partially HLA-mismatched HSCTs performed in our Institute in the last ten years (Unrelated Donor, UD: 60; Mismatched Related Donor, MMRD: 164) in patients affected by myeloid malignancies (Acute Myeloid Leukemia, AML: 173; Myelodisplastic Syndrome, MDS: 27, Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: 17; others: 7). All patients received myeloablative conditioning and infusion of donor T cells, either as part of the graft or as an add-back. Patients' follow-up included bone marrow genomic HLA typing to identify HLA loss relapses. In selected cases of HLA loss relapse cryopreserved serial serum samples harvested after HSCT were analyzed for the eventual presence of anti HLA Class I or Class II antibodies. ResultsWe documented 77 cases of relapse: 66 after MMRD and 11 after UD HSCT. Out of 77 relapses 21 (27%) were due to genomic loss of the mismatched HLA in leukemic cells. HLA loss occurred in 19 patients with AML, one with MDS and one with myelofibrosis. All the 21 cases of HLA loss occurred after MMRD HSCT (32%), so the analysis for putative risk factors were limited to this subgroup of transplants (n=164), comparing the frequencies of putative risk factors between patients with HLA loss and “classical” relapses (n=21 and 45, respectively). HLA loss relapses occurred significantly later than their classical counterparts (median time to relapse 307 vs 86 days, p<0.0001) in this very high-risk population, suggesting that outgrowth of the mutant variants require a considerable lapse of time. None of the disease-related factors we addressed (amongst which disease subtype, cytogenetics, molecular profile and disease status at HSCT) correlated significantly with eventual HLA loss. Use of an unmanipulated T cell-repleted graft resulted to be a risk factor for HLA loss relapses (Chi2=6.36; p=0.01). Both acute (HR:4.67, CI 95%: 1.53-14.22; p=0.007) and chronic (HR: 1.71; CI 95%: 0.68-4.28; p=0.01) Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) occurred more frequently in patients with HLA loss relapses. Intriguingly, HLA-C*04 was more frequent in the mismatched haplotype of patients with HLA loss as compared to those with classical relapse (Chi2= 8.07; p=0.04), possibly suggesting an higher immunogenicity of the allele, hinted also by a similarly higher frequency in patients who did not relapse (Chi2=2.77; p=0.096). In our series, predicted NK alloreactivity had no apparent impact on eventual HLA loss. In none of the five patients studied to date we could evidence circulating anti-HLA antibodies, suggesting that humoral immunity does not play a major role in this phenomenon. Since lymphocyte infusions from the original donor are expected to be inefficacious to treat HLA loss relapses, whenever fit these patients were candidate to re-transplantation from alternative donors, HLA-mismatched and putatively alloreactive against the relapsed leukemia. Still, outcome was poor, with 5 of 8 re-transplanted patients dying of transplant-related mortality and only one alive in complete remission at a follow-up of 18 months. ConclusionsGenomic loss of the mismatched HLA haplotype is an extremely frequent mechanism of leukemia immune evasion and relapse after MMRD HSCT. It appears to be prompted by selective immune pressure mediated by donor-derived T cells, and accordingly occurs more frequently upon T cell-repleted transplants and in the presence of acute and chronic GvHD, clinical hallmarks of T cell alloreactivity. Conversely the role of NK and B cells in HLA loss needs further investigation, but appears to date less pronounced. Given the poor outcome of re-transplantation, mainly due to toxicity, novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are needed to anticipate the detection and improve the treatment of these frequent variants of leukemia relapse. Disclosures:Bordignon:MolMed SpA: Employment. Bonini:MolMed SpA: Consultancy.

Early liver retransplantation in adults

Up to 23% of liver allografts fail post-transplant. Retransplantation is only the recourse but remains controversial due to inferior outcomes. The objective of our study was to identify high-risk periods for retransplantation and then compare survival outcomes and risk factors. We performed an analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data for all adult liver recipients from 2002 through 2011. We analyzed the records of 49,288 recipients; of those, 2714 (5.5%) recipients were retransplanted. Our analysis included multivariate regression with the outcome of retransplantation. The highest retransplantation rates were within the first week (19% of all retransplantation, day 0-7), month (20%, day 8-30), and year (33%, day 31-365). Only retransplantation within the first year (day 0-365) had below standard outcomes. The most significant risk factors were as follows: within the first week, cold ischemia time >16 h [odds ratio (OR) 3.6]; within the first month, use of split allografts (OR 2.9); and within the first year, use of a liver donated after cardiac death (OR 4.9). Each of the three high-risk periods within the first year had distinct causes of graft failure, risk factors for retransplantation, and survival rates after retransplantation.

Excellent liver retransplantation outcomes in hepatitis C‐infected recipients

Survival outcomes for liver retransplantation (LRTx) after graft loss in HCV patients (HCV-LRTx) are generally considered inferior to those after non-HCV-LRTx. Between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011, our center performed 663 LTx, including 116 (17.5%) LRTx, 41 (35.3%) of which were more than 90 d after the LTx. Twenty-nine (70.7%) LRTx were performed in HCV antibody-positive individuals. We compared patient demographics, baseline characteristics and outcomes of our HCV-LRTx group with the HCV-LRTx patients from the most recent OPTN database covering the same time period. Our Kaplan-Meier HCV-LRTx one-, three-, and five-yr HCV-LRTx patient survival rates were 86.2%, 79.0%, and 72.4%, respectively compared with the OPTN one-, three-, and five-yr HCV-LRTx survival rates of 73.3%, 59.0%, and 51.3% respectively. Likewise, our graft survival rates were higher than OPTN rates at all time points studied. We performed a higher percentage of HCV-LRTx as simultaneous liver/kidney transplants (SLK) (37.9% vs. 21.8%) and recorded shorter warm (30 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 23 min) and cold ischemic times (5:44 ± 1:53 vs. 7:36 ± 3:12 h:min). In our experience, HCV-LRTx patient and graft survival rates are comparable to LTx survival rates and are higher than the rates described by OPTN.

Long-term Outcome of Kidney Retransplantation in Comparison With First Kidney Transplantation: A Report From the Thai Transplantation Registry

IntroductionKidney retransplantation is a high-risk procedure that is increasingly performed because of previous graft failure. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of kidney retransplantations compared with first kidney transplantations under the current era of immunosuppression. MethodsSince the first retransplantation in Thailand was performed in 1993, this study included all consecutive cases registered in the Thai Transplantation Registry database from January 1993 to December 2011. A total of 3337 kidney transplantations were available for the analysis. Graft loss was defined as a return to dialysis or graft removal. Death with a functioning graft was censored. ResultsOf 3337 kidney transplantations during the study period, 113 were second and 3 were third transplantations. Among these 116 retransplantations, the most common identified causes of end-stage renal disease were chronic glomerulonephritis (38.8%), followed by hypertensive nephropathy (13.0%), diabetic nephropathy (6.0%), and lupus nephritis (1.7%). The retransplantation recipients were older (mean age, 46.2 ± 12.8 years) than the first transplantation group (mean age, 42.2 ± 12.8 years). The proportion of living-related kidney transplantations and male sex were similar between first and retransplantation recipients. Fourteen percent of retransplantation recipients showed high immunologic risk as defined by current panel reactive antibodies ≥30% compared with 3% of those in the first transplantation group (P < .001). The percentages of induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin and anti–interleukin-2 antibody in the retransplantation and first transplantation groups were 18.3% versus 4.3% and 60.0% versus 32.6%, respectively. The graft survival rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) at 1, 5, and 10 years were 88.6% (80.7–93.3), 87.3% (79.1–92.5), and 74.4% (53.7–86.9) among retransplantation, versus 95.0% (94.1–95.7), 87.0% (85.5–88.5), and 70.7% (67.4–73.8) among first transplantation groups, respectively (P = .63). Patient survival rates were not different between first and retransplantation groups (P = .42). The leading cause of graft loss in the retransplantation group was chronic allograft nephropathy (22%), whereas infection (57%) was the major cause of death in this group. ConclusionThe 10-year patient and graft survival rates of kidney retransplantation were acceptable. The combination of induction therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor and a mycophenolate mofetil/mychophenolic acid–based regimen lead to outcomes comparable to first kidney transplantations among our cohort of 3337 patients.

Intestinal and Multivisceral Retransplantation Results: Literature Review

BackgroundIntestinal/multivisceral transplantation (IT/MVT) is the gold standard treatment for patients with intestinal failure and complications related to total parenteral nutrition, gastrointestinal inoperable indolent tumors, or diffuse portal trombosis. Currently, the reported 1-year patient survival rate is around 80%, similar to other solid organ abdominal transplantations. Unfortunately, the patient survival decreases after the first year with the 5-year rate not close to 70% yet. Acute cellular rejection is the main cause of graft loss. Its early diagnosis may make it possible to improve survival of retransplantations. ObjectiveTo analyze the reported results published in the last 5 years by leading transplant centers to evaluate IT/MVT retransplantation results. MethodsWe performed a literature review using PubMed focusing on multivisceral and intestinal retransplantation in articles published between 2006 and 2012. In relation to the first transplantation, we analyzed demographics, imunosuppression, rejection, infection as well as graft and patient survival rates. ResultsTwo centers reported results on intestinal and multivisceral retransplantations. Mazariegos et al reported their experience with 15 intestinal retransplantations in 14 pediatric recipients. Four patients died from posttransplant lymphoperliferative disease, severe acute cellular rejection, fungal sepsis, or bleeding from a pseudoaneurysm at a mean time of 5.7 months post-transplantation. Total parenteral nutrition was weaned at a median time of 32 days. Abu-Elmaged et al reported 47 cases with a 5-year survival of 47% for all retransplant modalities. Retransplantation with liver-contained visceral allograft achieved a 5-year survival rate of 61% compared with 16% for liver-free visceral grafts. ConclusionDespite those huge improvements, some transplanted patients develop severe acute cellular rejection, culminating in graft loss and retransplantation. Repots on multivisceral and intestinal retransplantation outcomes suggest that it is a viable procedure with appropriate patient survival after primary graft loss.

Early and late outcomes after cardiac retransplantation.

Cardiac retransplantation remains the most viable option for patients with allograft heart failure; however, careful patient selection is paramount considering limited allograft resources. We analyzed clinical outcomes following retransplantation in an academic, tertiary care institution. Between 1981 and 2011, 593 heart transplantations, including 22 retransplantations were performed at our institution. We analyzed the preoperative demographic characteristics, cause of allograft loss, short- and long-term surgical outcomes and cause of death among patients who had cardiac retransplantations. Twenty-two patients underwent retransplantation: 10 for graft vascular disease, 7 for acute rejection and 5 for primary graft failure. Mean age at retransplantation was 43 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 6 patients were women. Thirteen patients were critically ill preoperatively, requiring inotropes and/or mechanical support. The median interval between primary and retransplantation was 2.2 (range 0-16) years. Thirty-day mortality was 31.8%, and conditional (> 30 d) 1-, 5- and 10-year survival after retransplantation were 93%, 79% and 59%, respectively. A diagnosis of allograft vasculopathy (p = 0.008) and an interval between primary and retransplantation greater than 1 year (p = 0.016) had a significantly favourable impact on 30-day mortality. The median and mean survival after retransplantation were 3.3 and 5 (SD 6, range 0-18) years, respectively; graft vascular disease and multiorgan failure were the most common causes of death. Long-term outcomes for primary and retransplantation are similar if patients survive the 30-day postoperative period. Retransplantation within 1 year of the primary transplantation resulted in a high perioperative mortality and thus may be a contraindication to retransplantation.

Long-Term Outcome of Kidney Re-Transplantation in Comparison with First Kidney Transplantation: a Report from Thai Transplant Registry

Introduction: Kidney re-transplantation is a high-risk procedure which is increasingly performed because of previous graft failure. The aim of this study was to determine the long term outcomes of kidney retransplantation compared with the first kidney transplantation under the current era of new immunosuppressions. Methods: Since the first re-transplantation in Thailand was performed in 1993, this study included all consecutive cases registered in the Thai Transplant Registry database from January 1993 to December 2011. A total of 3,337 kidney transplants were available for the analysis. Graft loss was defined as return to dialysis or graft removal. Death with functioning graft was considered as censored. Results: Of 3,337 kidney transplantations between study periods, 113 were second and 3 were third transplantation. Among these 116 re-transplantation recipients, the most common identified causes of the end-stage renal disease included chronic glomerulonephritis (38.8%), followed by hypertensive nephropathy (13.0%), diabetic nephropathy (6.0%) and lupus nephritis (1.7%). The re-transplanted recipients were older (mean age 46.2 + 12.8 years) than first transplant group (mean age 42.2 + 12.8 years). The proportion of living-related kidney transplant and male gender were similar between first kidney transplant recipients and retransplanted recipients. Fourteen percent of re-transplant recipients showed high immunologic risk as defined by current panel reactive antibodies (PRA) > 30% compared with 3% of those in first transplant group (P< 0.001). The percentages of induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin and anti-interleukin 2 antibody in re-transplant group and first transplant group were 18.3% vs. 4.3% and 60.0% vs. 32.6%, respectively. In addition, retransplant group had higher proportion of induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (18.3%) and anti-interleukin 2 antibody (60.0%) when compared with those in first transplant group(. The graft survival rates (95%CI) at 1, 5 and 10 years were 88.6% (80.7-93.3), 87.3% (79.1-92.5) and 74.4%(53.7-86.9) among re-transplants, versus 95.0% (94.1-95.7), 87.0% (85.5-88.5) and 70.7%(67.4-73.8) in first transplant group, respectively (P=0.63). Patient survival rates were 95.1%(88.6-97.9), 95.1%(88.6-97.9) and 90.9%(76.6-96.7) in re-transplant group, versus 96.1%(95.4-96.8), 90.9%(89.6-92.1) and 83.7%(81.2-86.0) in first transplant group at 1, 5 and 10years respectively(P=0.42). The leading cause of graft loss among re-transplant group was chronic allograft nephropathy (21%) whereas infection (14%) was the major cause of death among this group. Conclusion: The 10 year patient and graft survival of kidney retransplantation is good. Combination of induction therapy, CNI and MMF/MPA based regimens can lead the outcomes comparable with the nonsensitized first kidney transplantation in our cohort of 3337 patients.