Outcome Of Liver Transplantation Research Articles

Influence of sex on outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study in China.

Sex-specific differences are observed in various liver diseases, but the influence of sex on the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains to be determined. This study is the first Chinese nationwide investigation of the role of sex in post-LT outcomes in patients with HCC. Data for recipients with HCC registered in the China Liver Transplant Registry between January 2015 and December 2020 were analyzed. The associations between donor, recipient, or donor-recipient transplant patterns by sex and the post-LT outcomes were studied with propensity score matching (PSM). The survival associated with different sex-based donor-recipient transplant patterns was further studied. Among 3,769 patients enrolled in this study, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with HCC after LT were 96.1%, 86.4%, and 78.5%, respectively, in female recipients, and 95.8%, 79.0%, and 70.7%, respectively, in male recipients after PSM (P = 0.009). However, the OS was comparable between recipients with female donors and male donors. Multivariate analysis indicated that male recipient sex was a risk factor for post-LT survival (HR = 1.381, P = 0.046). Among the donor-recipient transplant patterns, the male-male donor-recipient transplant pattern was associated with the poorest post-LT survival (P < 0.05). Our findings highlighted that the post-LT outcomes of female recipients were significantly superior to those of male recipients, and the male-male donor-recipient transplant pattern was associated with the poorest post-LT survival. Livers from male donors may provide the most benefit to female recipients. Our results indicate that sex should be considered as a critical factor in organ allocation.

Influence of donor age on liver transplantation outcomes: A multivariate analysis and comparative study.

The growing disparity between the rising demand for liver transplantation (LT) and the limited availability of donor organs has prompted a greater reliance on older liver grafts. Traditionally, utilizing livers from elderly donors has been associated with outcomes inferior to those achieved with grafts from younger donors. By accounting for additional risk factors, we hypothesize that the utilization of older liver grafts has a relatively minor impact on both patient survival and graft viability. To evaluate the impact of donor age on LT outcomes using multivariate analysis and comparing young and elderly donor groups. In the period from April 2013 to December 2018, 656 adult liver transplants were performed at the University Hospital Merkur. Several multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were developed to independently assess the significance of donor age. Donor age was treated as a continuous variable. The approach involved univariate and multivariate analysis, including variable selection and assessment of interactions and transformations. Additionally, to exemplify the similarity of using young and old donor liver grafts, the group of 87 recipients of elderly donor liver grafts (≥ 75 years) was compared to a group of 124 recipients of young liver grafts (≤ 45 years) from the dataset. Survival rates of the two groups were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to test the differences between groups. Using multivariate Cox analysis, we found no statistical significance in the role of donor age within the constructed models. Even when retained during the entire model development, the donor age's impact on survival remained insignificant and transformations and interactions yielded no substantial effects on survival. Consistent insignificance and low coefficient values suggest that donor age does not impact patient survival in our dataset. Notably, there was no statistical evidence that the five developed models did not adhere to the proportional hazards assumption. When comparing donor age groups, transplantation using elderly grafts showed similar early graft function, similar graft (P = 0.92), and patient survival rates (P = 0.86), and no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. Our center's experience indicates that donor age does not play a significant role in patient survival, with elderly livers performing comparably to younger grafts when accounting for other risk factors.

Outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in donation after circulatory death compared with donation after brain death: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction and ObjectivesDue to organ shortages, liver transplantation (LT) using donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD) grafts has become more common. There is limited and conflicting evidence on LT outcomes using DCD grafts compared to those using donation-after-brain death (DBD) grafts for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to summarize the current evidence on the outcomes of DCD-LT and DBD-LT in patients with HCC. Materials and MethodsOnline databases were searched for studies comparing DCD-LT and DBD-LT outcomes in patients with HCC and a meta-analysis was conducted using fixed- or random-effects models. ResultsFive studies involving 487 (33.4%) HCC DCD-LT patients and 973 (66.6%) DBD-LT patients were included. The meta-analysis showed comparable 1-year [relative risk (RR)=0.99, 95%CI:0.95 to 1.03, p=0.53] and 3-year [RR=0.99, 95%CI:0.89 to 1.09, p=0.79] recurrence-free survival. The corresponding 1-year [RR=0.98, 95%CI:0.93 to 1.03, p=0.35] and 3-year [RR=0.94, 95%CI:0.87 to 1.01, p=0.08] patient survival and 1-year [RR=0.91, 95%CI:0.71 to 1.16, p=0.43] and 3-year [RR=0.92, 95%CI:0.67 to 1.26, p=0.59] graft survival were also comparable. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts regarding the tumor characteristics, donor/recipient risk factors and the incidence of post-operative complications, including acute rejection, primary non-function, biliary complications and retransplantation. ConclusionsBased on the current evidence, it has been found that comparable outcomes can be achieved in HCC patients using DCD-LT compared to DBD-LT, particularly when employing good quality graft, strict donor and recipient selection, and effective surgical management. The decision to utilize DCD-LT for HCC patients should be personalized, taking into consideration the risk of post-LT HCC recurrence. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023445812).

The Predictive Value of Graft Viability and Bioenergetics Testing Towards the Outcome in Liver Transplantation.

Donor organ biomarkers with sufficient predictive value in liver transplantation (LT) are lacking. We herein evaluate liver viability and mitochondrial bioenergetics for their predictive capacity towards the outcome in LT. We enrolled 43 consecutive patients undergoing LT. Liver biopsy samples taken upon arrival after static cold storage were assessed by histology, real-time confocal imaging analysis (RTCA), and high-resolution respirometry (HRR) for mitochondrial respiration of tissue homogenates. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) served as primary endpoint. HRR data were analysed with a focus on the efficacy of ATP production or P-L control efficiency, calculated as 1-L/P from the capacity of oxidative phosphorylation P and non-phosphorylating respiration L. Twenty-two recipients experienced EAD. Pre-transplant histology was not predictive of EAD. The mean RTCA score was significantly lower in the EAD cohort (-0.75 ± 2.27) compared to the IF cohort (0.70 ± 2.08; p = 0.01), indicating decreased cell viability. P-L control efficiency was predictive of EAD (0.76 ± 0.06 in IF vs. 0.70 ± 0.08 in EAD-livers; p = 0.02) and correlated with the RTCA score. Both RTCA and P-L control efficiency in biopsy samples taken during cold storage have predictive capacity towards the outcome in LT. Therefore, RTCA and HRR should be considered for risk stratification, viability assessment, and bioenergetic testing in liver transplantation.

Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundLiver transplantation has been shown to be superior to resection in highly selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, yet has traditionally been contraindicated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Herein, we aimed to examine contemporary trends and outcomes for surgical resection and liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with stage I-III intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 2010 and 2018 who underwent resection or liver transplantation. Overall survival was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods stratified by management. Secondary analysis of patients undergoing transplant for cholangiocarcinoma was performed with the United Network for Organ Sharing database. ResultsOf 2,565 patients, 2,412 (94.0%) underwent resection and 153 (5.96%) liver transplantation of which 84 (54.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Utilization of liver transplantation remained between 3.9-7.8% annually. Unadjusted 5-year overall survival was higher for liver transplantation than resection (59.8% vs 39.9%, p=0.0067). Yet, adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.27, p=0.58). On secondary analysis including 437 patients with all subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma, unadjusted 5-year overall survival was higher for non-cholangiocarcinoma indications (79% vs 52-54%, p<0.001). ConclusionUtilization of liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains low and many cases are likely incidental. While partial hepatectomy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable disease, our findings suggest that highly selected patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may achieve favorable outcomes after liver transplantation. Granular, prospective data is needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from transplant and allocate scarce liver grafts.

The Clinical Course of Portopulmonary Hypertension and Outcomes With Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Treatment: Observational Study of Data From the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network

Background. Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) occurs in patients with advanced liver disease and can be a contraindication to liver transplant (LT). Improvement of hemodynamic parameters with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies (including endothelin receptor antagonists [ERAs]) may help some patients to become eligible for LT. Methods. We conducted a retrospective secondary data analysis to describe the clinical course and management of PoPH in patients on a US registry LT waitlist and outcomes in patients receiving an ERA. Results. At the time of LT waitlist entry (1996–2019), patient characteristics and disease severity were similar in the 685 patients with PoPH enrolled overall (LT waitlist data set) and the 420 of them who underwent LT (LT data set). Most patients (92.0%) had a model for end-stage liver disease exception granted before entering the LT waitlist. Patients spent a median of 8.9 mo (interquartile range, 3.7–19.7) on the LT waitlist before undergoing LT. Overall, 77.1% of patients received PAH treatment at LT waitlist entry (ERAs, 30.1%). Hemodynamic parameters improved in ≥95% of patients between the first assessment versus the second (median interval, 9 mo) and last assessments (median interval, 14 mo). At the first assessment, 49.6% of patients had mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥45 mm Hg versus 2.6% and 1.8% of patients at the second and last assessments, respectively; 47.5% of patients had pulmonary vascular resistance &gt;450 dynes·s/cm5 versus 0.9% and 0.2% of patients at the second and last assessments. One-year survival was 90.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.6-92.9) following LT waitlist entry and was 86.4% (95% CI, 82.6-89.5) after LT; 5-y survival was 67.4% (95% CI, 60.0-73.8) while on the LT waitlist (before LT) and was 75.6% (95% CI, 70.4-80.0) following LT. Conclusions. This large US study of patients with PoPH on an LT waitlist confirms that effective PAH treatments can help patients achieve acceptable hemodynamics, providing the opportunity to undergo LT.

Cardiovascular Considerations in Liver TransplantationA Review of Risks, Diagnostics, and Management

This comprehensive review article delves into the critical role of cardiovascular disorders in liver transplantation (LT) candidates, focusing on coronary artery disease (CAD), cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM), and structural heart disease. It examines the prevalence and implications of these conditions on LT outcomes, emphasizing the necessity of a thorough preoperative cardiac evaluation and risk stratification. The article explores various aspects of cardiac risk in LT, including CAD, CCM, and coexisting structural heart diseases. It highlights the importance of diagnostic techniques such as echocardiography, stress testing, cardiac catheterization, and CMR in the evaluation process. The review aligns with current guidelines from major cardiac societies and discusses the implications of CCM and structural heart disease on LT. It also assesses the role of cardiac biomarkers in predicting postoperative outcomes and explores functional cardiopulmonary assessment tools. Finally, the article considers the intraoperative and postoperative cardiac risks associated with LT, concluding with the significant impact of cardiovascular management in improving LT outcomes.

Recent outcomes of liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome: A study of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) and affiliated centers.

Management of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) has improved over the last decades. The main aim was to evaluate the contemporary post-liver transplant (post-LT) outcomes in Europe. Data from all patients who underwent transplantation from 1976 to 2020 was obtained from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). Patients < 16 years, with secondary BCS or HCC were excluded. Patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) before and after 2000 were compared. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified predictors of PS and GS after 2000. Supplemental data was requested from all ELTR-affiliated centers and received from 44. In all, 808 patients underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2020. One-, 5- and 10-year PS was 84%, 77%, and 68%, and GS was 79%, 70%, and 62%, respectively. Both significantly improved compared to outcomes before 2000 ( p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 50 months and retransplantation rate was 12%. Recipient age (aHR:1.04,95%CI:1.02-1.06) and MELD score (aHR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.06), especially above 30, were associated with worse PS, while male sex had better outcomes (aHR:0.63,95%CI:0.41-0.96). Donor age was associated with worse PS (aHR:1.01,95%CI:1.00-1.03) and GS (aHR:1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.03). In 353 patients (44%) with supplemental data, 33% had myeloproliferative neoplasm, 20% underwent TIPS pre-LT, and 85% used anticoagulation post-LT. Post-LT anticoagulation was associated with improved PS (aHR:0.29,95%CI:0.16-0.54) and GS (aHR:0.48,95%CI:0.29-0.81). Hepatic artery thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurred in 9% and 7%, while recurrent BCS was rare (3%). LT for BCS results in excellent patient- and graft-survival. Older recipient or donor age and higher MELD are associated with poorer outcomes, while long-term anticoagulation improves both patient and graft outcomes.

Use of 50 years or older donors in septuagenarian recipients for liver transplantation: Potential to expand the donor pool: Old livers for old transplant recipients

BackgroundWhile younger donors have better liver transplant (LT) outcomes, the median age of both the donor and recipient pools is rising. The impact of using donors ≥50 years on the LT outcomes of septuagenarians is unknown. MethodsFrom 2011–2021, outcomes in septuagenarian LT recipients from donor livers <50 year-old (DON<50) and donor livers ≥50 year-old (DON≥50) were analyzed using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Post-LT survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model. A propensity score was utilized to conduct one-to-one matching using 14 recipient variables (1230-pairs). ResultsThere were 2797 septuagenarian deceased-donor LT recipients during the study period. Of these, 1487 (53.2 %) were DON <50 with median age of 34 years and 1310 (46.8 %) were DON ≥50 with median age of 60 years. The number of LT for septuagenarians has increased over the last decade. The causes of donor and recipient deaths were different between two groups. Post-LT one-year survival (DON<50: 89.3 % vs. DON≥50: 88.3 %) and five-year survival (DON<50: 41.4 % vs DON≥50: 42.8 %) were comparable. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that donor age ≥50 years is not associated with increased mortality after LT in the matched cohort (HR: 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.88–1.24, P = 0.63). ConclusionsThe utilization of carefully selected donor livers older than 50 years may be a viable option for septuagenarian LT candidates by lowering their waitlist time and can maximize the organ utilization without compromising the outcomes.

Cold stress-induced ferroptosis in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells determines liver transplant injury and outcomes.

Although cold preservation remains the gold standard in organ transplantation, cold stress-induced cellular injury is a significant problem in clinical orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Because a recent study showed that cold stress activates ferroptosis, a form of regulated cell death, we investigated whether and how ferroptosis determines OLT outcomes in mice and humans. Treatment with ferroptosis inhibitor (ferrostatin-1) during cold preservation reduced lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde; MDA), primarily in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), and alleviated ischemia/reperfusion injury in mouse OLT. Similarly, ferrostatin-1 reduced cell death in cold-stressed LSEC cultures. LSECs deficient in nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), a critical regulator of ferroptosis, were susceptible to cold stress-induced cell death, concomitant with enhanced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and expression of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake regulator (MICU1). Indeed, supplementing MICU1 inhibitor reduced ER stress, MDA expression, and cell death in NRF2-deficient but not WT LSECs, suggesting NRF2 is a critical regulator of MICU1-mediated ferroptosis. Consistent with murine data, enhanced liver NRF2 expression reduced MDA levels, hepatocellular damage, and incidence of early allograft dysfunction in human OLT recipients. This translational study provides a clinically applicable strategy in which inhibition of ferroptosis during liver cold preservation mitigates OLT injury by protecting LSECs from peritransplant stress via an NRF2-regulatory mechanism.

Liver transplantation for treatment of nonresectable primary and secondary liver malignancies : Hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas and colorectal liver metastases

With the increasing efficacy of systemic therapy, liver transplantation plays an important role not only for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but also for nonresectable intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (iCC), perihilar cholangiocellular carcinoma (phCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). To review the current state of knowledge regarding the indications, patient selection and expected outcomes of liver transplantation for HCC, iCC, phCC and CRLM. When combined with neoadjuvant locoregional therapy (LRT) and/or systemic therapy, patients with nonresectable HCC, iCC, pCC and CRLM confined to the liver can be successfully transplanted with 5‑year survival rates exceeding 65%. The key to success is strict patient selection, which includes oncogenetic (e.g., BRAFV600E mutation status) and clinical criteria indicative of individual tumor biology (tumor markers: alpha-fetoprotein, AFP/carbohydrate antigen 19‑9, CA19-9/carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA, stable response to neoadjuvant therapy) in addition to morphometric criteria. Liver transplantation offers the possibility of curative treatment even for nonresectable hepatic malignancies. Amajor limitation of this treatment is the lack of donor organs. Crucial for success is patient selection based on individual tumor biology.

Comparison of different preoperative objective nutritional indices for evaluating 30-d mortality and complications after liver transplantation.

The nutritional status is closely related to the prognosis of liver transplant recipients, but few studies have reported the role of preoperative objective nutritional indices in predicting liver transplant outcomes. To compare the predictive value of various preoperative objective nutritional indicators for determining 30-d mortality and complications following liver transplantation (LT). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 162 recipients who underwent LT at our institution from December 2019 to June 2022. This study identified several independent risk factors associated with 30-d mortality, including blood loss, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), the nutritional risk index (NRI), and the control nutritional status. The 30-d mortality rate was 8.6%. Blood loss, the NRI, and the PNI were found to be independent risk factors for the occurrence of severe postoperative complications. The NRI achieved the highest prediction values for 30-d mortality [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.861, P < 0.001] and severe complications (AUC = 0.643, P = 0.011). Compared to those in the high NRI group, the low patients in the NRI group had lower preoperative body mass index and prealbumin and albumin levels, as well as higher alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin levels, Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores and prothrombin time (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the group with a low NRI exhibited significantly greater incidences of intraabdominal bleeding, primary graft nonfunction, and mortality. The NRI has good predictive value for 30-d mortality and severe complications following LT. The NRI could be an effective tool for transplant surgeons to evaluate perioperative nutritional risk and develop relevant nutritional therapy.

Liver Transplantation from Brain-Dead Donors with Hepatitis B or C in South Korea: A 2014-2020 Korean Organ Transplantation Registry Data Analysis.

BACKGROUND According to the current guidelines for liver transplantation (LT) of brain-dead donors with hepatitis B or C virus (HBV or HCV) in Korea, grafts from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)(+) or HCV antibody (anti-HCV)(+) donors must be transplanted only to HBsAg(+) or anti-HCV(+) recipients, respectively. We aimed to determine the current status and outcomes of brain-dead donor LT with HBV or HCV in Korea. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective observational study included all LTs from brain-dead donors in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry between April 2014 and December 2020. According to donor hepatitis status, 24 HBV(+), 1 HCV(+), and 1010 HBV(-)/HCV(-) donors were included. RESULTS Baseline/final model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD) for HBV(+), HCV(+), and HBV(-)/HCV(-) were 22.4±9.3/27.8±7.8, 16/11, and 33.0±15.4/35.5±7.1, respectively. MELD score of HBV (+) were lower than those of HBV(-)/HCV(-) (P<0.01). Five-year graft and patient survival rates of HBV(+) and HBV(-)/HCV(-) recipients were 81.7%/85.6%, and 76.6%/76.7%, respectively (P=0.73 and P=0.038). One-year graft and patient survival rates of HCV (+) graft recipients were both 100%. CONCLUSIONS No differences in graft and patient survival rates between HBV(+) and HBV(-)/HCV(-) groups were observed. Although accumulating the results of transplants from HBV (+) or HCV(+) grafts to HBV(-) or HCV(-) recipients is not possible owing to domestic regulations, Korea should conditionally permit transplantations from HBV(+) or HCV(+) grafts to HBV(-) or HCV(-) recipients by considering the risks and benefits based on foreign studies. Thereafter, we can accumulate the data from Korea and analyze the outcomes.

SimLivA–Modeling ischemia‐reperfusion injury in the liver: A first step towards a clinical decision support tool

SummaryThe SIMulation supported LIVer Assessment for donor organs (SimLivA) project aims to develop a mathematical model to accurately simulate the influence of mechanical alterations in marginal liver grafts (specifically steatotic ones) and cold ischemia on early ischemia‐reperfusion injury (IRI) during liver transplantation. Our project tackles significant research challenges, including the co‐development of computational methodologies, experimental studies, clinical processes, and technical workflows. We aim to refine a continuum‐biomechanical model for enhanced IRI prediction, collect pivotal experimental and clinical data, and assess the clinical applicability of our model. Our efforts involve augmenting and tailoring a coupled continuum‐biomechanical, multiphase, and multi‐scale partial differential equation‐ordinary differential equation (PDE‐ODE) model of the liver lobule, allowing us to numerically simulate IRI depending on the degree of steatosis and the duration of ischemia. The envisaged model will intertwine the structure, perfusion, and function of the liver, serving as a crucial aid in clinical decision‐making processes. We view this as the initial step towards an in‐silico clinical decision support tool aimed at enhancing the outcomes of liver transplantation. In this paper, we provide an overview of the SimLivA project and our preliminary findings, which include: a cellular model that delineates critical processes in the context of IRI during transplantation; and the integration of this model into a multi‐scale PDE‐ODE model using a homogenized, multi‐scale, multi‐component approach within the Theory of Porous Media (TPM) framework. The model has successfully simulated the interconnected relationship between structure, perfusion, and function—all of which are integral to IRI. Initial results show simulations at the cellular scale that describe critical processes related to IRI during transplantation. After integrating this model into a multiscale PDE‐ODE model, first simulations were performed on the spatial distribution of key functions during warm and cold ischaemia. In addition, we were able to study the effect of tissue perfusion and temperature, two critical parameters in the context of liver transplantation and IRI.

Utility of nifedipine use for Doppler ultrasound early after liver transplantation to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes.

To evaluate the response to nifedipine administration measured by changes in hepatic arterial (HA) flow on post-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients. Patients who underwent LT with post-operative Doppler US within 3days between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were included in this retrospective single center study. The patients who received and did not receive nifedipine during the Doppler US comprised the study and control groups, respectively. A positive response to nifedipine was defined as the detection of HA flow when none was present initially or a reduction in HA resistive index (RI) ≥ 0.1 after nifedipine administration. The rates of re-transplantation, re-operation, percutaneous intervention (PCI), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of clinic-demographic variables and Doppler findings with the outcome measures. 444 LT patients (305M/139F, mean age 51.7 ± 17.4years, mean interval between LT-Doppler US 1.12 ± 0.9days) are presented. 220 patients comprised the nifedipine study group [n = 157/220 (71.4%) responder, n = 63/220 (28.6%) nonresponder] and 224 patients comprised the control group. There was no difference in re-transplantation or PCI rates between the groups (all p-values ≥ 0.2 and ≥ 0.08, respectively). The responder group had a lower rate of re-operation vs. the control group (15.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.03) and nonresponder group (15.9% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.004). 1-year and 2-year OS were similar between the groups (all p-values > 0.37). Short-term complication rates and long-term outcomes for patients with liver transplant who responded to nifedipine administration on Doppler US are similar to those who did not require nifedipine administration. A lack of response to nifedipine was associated with a higher re-operation rate.

The triglyceride-glucose index: a novel predictor of stroke and all-cause mortality in liver transplantation recipients

BackgroundThe triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, identified as a reliable indicator of insulin resistance (IR), was reported to be associated with stroke recurrence and morbidity in the general population and critically ill patients. However, the relationship in liver transplantation (LT) recipients remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the TyG index and post-LT stroke along with all-cause mortality and further assess the influence of IR on the LT recipients’ prognosis.MethodsThe retrospective cohort study enrolled 959 patients who underwent LT at a university-based medical centre between January 2015 and January 2021. The participants were divided into three groups according to their TyG index tertiles. The primary outcome was post-LT stroke. Multivariate logistic regression, COX proportional hazards regression, and restricted cubic spline RCS were used to examine the association between the TyG index and outcomes in LT recipients.ResultsWith a median TyG index of 8.23 (7.78–8.72), 780 (87.18% males) patients were eventually included. The incidence of post-LT stroke was 5.38%, and the in-hospital, 1-year, and 3-year mortality rates were 5.54%, 13.21%, and 15.77%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed an independent association between the TyG index and an increased risk of post-LT stroke [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.398 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.371–8.426) P = 0. 008], in-hospital mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 2.326 (95% CI: 1.089–4.931) P = 0.025], 1-year mortality [aHR, 1.668 (95% CI: 1.024–2.717) P = 0.039], and 3-year mortality [aHR, 1.837 (95% CI: 1.445–2.950) P = 0.012]. Additional RCS analysis also suggested a linear increase in the risk of postoperative stroke with elevated TyG index (P for nonlinearity = 0.480).ConclusionsThe TyG index may be a valuable and reliable indicator for assessing stroke risk and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing LT, suggesting its potential relevance in improving risk stratification during the peri-LT period.

Outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Experiences from a Vietnamese center.

Liver transplantation (LT) provides a favorable outcome for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and was launched in Vietnam in 2004. In this study, we evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of LT and its risk factors. This retrospective study analyzed HCC patients who underwent LT at Viet Duc University hospital, Vietnam, from 01/2012-03/2022. The following data were gathered: demographics, virus infection, tumor characteristics, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, Child-Pugh and MELD scores, selection criteria, type of LT, complications, 30-day mortality, and disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS). Fifty four patients were included, the mean age was 55.39 ± 8.46 years. Nearly 90% had hepatitis B virus-related HCC. The median (interquartile range) AFP level was 16.2 (88.7) ng/mL. The average MELD score was 10.57 ± 5.95; the rate of Child-Pugh A and B were 70.4% and 18.5%, respectively. Nearly 40% of the patients were within Milan criteria, brain-dead donor was 83.3%. Hepatic and portal vein thrombosis occurred in 0% and 1.9%, respectively; hepatic artery thrombosis 1.9%, biliary leakage 5.6%, and postoperative hemorrhage 3.7%. Ninety-day mortality was 5.6%. Five-year DFS and OS were 79.3% and 81.4%, respectively. MELD score and Child-Pugh score were predictive factors for DFS and OS (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh score was the only significant factor (p < 0.05). In Vietnam, LT is an effective therapy for HCC with an acceptable complication rate, mortality rate, and good survival outcomes, and should be further encouraged.

Impact of early immunosuppression on pediatric liver transplant outcomes within 1 year.

The Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation identified optimizing immunosuppression (IS) as a priority practice improvement area for patients, families, and providers. We aimed to evaluate associations between clinical characteristics, early IS, and outcomes. We analyzed pediatric liver transplant (LT) data from 2013 to 2018 in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registries. We included 2542 LT recipients in UNOS and 1590 in SPLIT. IS choice varied between centers with steroid induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use each ranging from 0% to 100% across centers. Clinical characteristics associated with early IS choice were inconsistent between the two data sets. T-cell depleting antibody use was associated with improved 1-year graft (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.76) and patient (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.79) survival in UNOS but decreased 1-year patient survival (HR 4.12, 95% CI 1.31-12.93) and increased acute rejection (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.07-2.34) in SPLIT. Non-T-cell depleting antibody use was not associated with differential risk of survival nor rejection. MMF use was associated with improved 1-year graft survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99) in UNOS only. Variation exists in center choice of early IS regimen. UNOS and SPLIT data provide conflicting associations between IS and outcomes in multivariable analysis. These results highlight the need for future multicenter collaborative work to identify evidence-based IS best practices.

Role of sarcopenia on outcomes in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Role of sarcopenia on outcomes in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Outcomes of liver transplant in patients with alcohol use disorders and opioid use disorders.

Outcomes of liver transplant in patients with alcohol use disorders and opioid use disorders.