Outcomes In Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Articles

Evaluation of an integrated yoga program in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A pilot study

BackgroundThe effects of integrated yoga programs on mental health outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have not been well explored. To explore the acceptability, implementation and effectiveness of an integrated eight-week yoga program plus aromatherapy massage in patients with IBD. MethodsNine participants with documented IBD were recruited from a gastroenterology clinic in Calgary, Alberta, Canada to participate in an integrated yoga program weekly for eight weeks with outcomes assessed at baseline and week 8. Primary outcomes were assessed using Theory of Planned Behaviour as a guiding theory to identify salient beliefs from qualitative analysis of a semi-structured interview, survey items measuring the strength of beliefs and a daily log was used to capture adherence and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were collected using validated survey tools examining anxiety, depression, stress, sleep quality, and physical and mental quality of life. ResultsAttitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control beliefs pertinent to the yoga intervention and daily practice were identified. Participants reported feeling the intervention was very helpful; however, felt guilt about not completing daily practices which decreased confidence and intention to continue with the practice. An average of 55.6% of in-person sessions were attended and decreased over time. Participants practiced on average of 5.4 days per week. Depression and mental health scores improved at week 8 from baseline. ConclusionsWe were able to identify key salient beliefs of IBD patients in regard to an integrated yoga plus aromatherapy massage intervention. This intervention appears to be acceptable and further research should explore its potential to improve mental and physical health outcomes including IBD symptoms.

MicroRNA-146a limits tumorigenic IL-17 signaling in colorectal cancer

Abstract Interleukin-17 (IL-17) is a major inflammatory cytokine implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) development. However, the mechanisms that control tumorigenic IL-17 signaling are poorly understood. Recently, expression changes and polymorphisms in the small non-coding RNA, microRNA-146a (miR-146a), have been associated with clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease and CRC patients. Here, we identified a novel role for miR-146a as a major negative regulator of colonic inflammation and tumorigenesis via modulation of IL-17 responses. MiR-146a-deficient mice are susceptible to both colitis-associated and sporadic CRC, and present with enhanced tumorigenic IL-17 signaling. Within myeloid cells, miR-146a targets RIPK2, an intermediate in NOD2 signaling, to limit myeloid cell-derived IL-17-inducing cytokines and restrict colonic IL-17 levels. Accordingly, myeloid cell-specific deletion of miR-146a leads to CRC susceptibility. Moreover, within intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), miR-146a targets TRAF6, an intermediate in IL-17R signaling, to restrict IEC responsiveness to IL-17. MiR-146a within IECs further suppresses CRC by targeting PTGES2, an enzyme for PGE2 synthesis. IEC-specific deletion of miR-146a confers marked CRC susceptibility. Importantly, preclinical administration of miR-146a mimic or direct inhibition of miR-146a targets, TRAF6/RIPK2 can ameliorate CRC. In conclusion, miR-146a prevents CRC by two interlinked mechanisms: 1) by limiting myeloid cell-mediated IL-17 production; and 2) by inhibiting tumorigenic IL-17R signaling in IECs. Overexpression of miR-146a may be a promising therapeutic approach for CRC to limit multiple pathways converging on tumorigenic IL-17 signaling.

The importance of sarcopenia as a prognostic predictor of the clinical course in acute severe ulcerative colitis patients

Background and aimAcute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening condition that requires timely referral for therapy. Sarcopenia has been associated with clinical outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study investigated the role of sarcopenia in predicting the clinical course of ASUC. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included ASUC patients with abdominal CT scans. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify a practical predictive index for the clinical course of ASUC. ResultsOf 233 included patients, 151 had intravenous corticosteroid (IVS) failure, among whom 32 received surgery without medical rescue therapy. Fifty patients underwent colectomy after medical rescue therapy failure. Of these 82 surgical patients, 42 suffered postoperative complications. Multivariable regression analysis showed that sarcopenia remained an independent risk factor for IVS failure (OR=2.969; 95% CI, 1.547–5.701; p = 0.001), colectomy after medical rescue therapy failure (OR=3.411; 95% CI, 1.147–10.141; p = 0.027), and postoperative complications after colectomy (OR=4.157; 95% CI, 1.364–12.667; p = 0.012). During follow-up, patients with colectomy after first-line treatment had a lower comprehensive complication index and better health-related quality of life. ConclusionSarcopenia is useful in predicting the clinical course and postoperative outcomes of ASUC.

Aging and IBD: A New Challenge for Clinicians and Researchers

Evidence from recent epidemiological data suggests that the patient population with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is chronologically aging. As these individuals become older, cellular senescence leads to a state of chronic inflammation. This process, known as inflammaging, is thought to be closely linked with biological aging and may be upregulated within IBD. As a consequence, we see an increased risk of aging-related disorders within IBD. In addition, we see that frailty, which results from physiologic decline, is increasing in prevalence and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in IBD. As such, in this review we explore the potential overlapping biology of IBD and aging, discuss the risk of aging-related disorders in IBD, and describe frailty and its relation to clinical outcomes within IBD. Finally, we discuss current considerations for clinical care and potential research avenues for further investigation.

Preoperative Serum Vedolizumab Levels Do Not Impact Postoperative Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Vedolizumab has been proposed to lead to fewer postoperative complications because of its gut specificity. Studies, however, suggest an increased risk of surgical site infections, yet the data are conflicting. This study aimed to assess the effect of vedolizumab drug levels on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for IBD. This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database. Patients were operated on by a single surgeon at an academic medical center. A total of 72 patients with IBD undergoing major abdominal surgery were included. Patients were exposed preoperatively to vedolizumab. The primary outcome measured was the postoperative morbidity in patients who had IBD with detectable vs undetectable vedolizumab levels. A total of 72 patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight patients had detectable vedolizumab levels (>1.6 μg/mL), and 34 had undetectable vedolizumab levels. The overall rate of complications was 39%, and ileus was the most common complication. There were no significant differences in clinical variables between the detectable and undetectable vedolizumab level patient groups except for the time between the last dose and surgery (p < 0.01). There were 42 patients in the ulcerative colitis cohort; 48% had an undetectable vedolizumab level and 52% had a detectable vedolizumab level. There were no differences in any postoperative morbidity between ulcerative colitis groups. The Crohn's cohort had 27 patients; 48% had an undetectable vedolizumab levels and 52% had a detectable vedolizumab level. There was a significantly lower incidence of postoperative ileus in patients who had Crohn's disease with detectable vedolizumab levels compared with patients with an undetectable vedolizumab level (p < 0.04). Limitations include a low overall patient population and a high rate of stoma formation. Serum vedolizumab levels do not influence postoperative morbidity in IBD. Vedolizumab may reduce the incidence of postoperative ileus in patients with Crohn's disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B574. ANTECEDENTES:Se ha propuesto que el vedolizumab presenta menos complicaciones postoperatorias debido a su especificidad intestinal. Sin embargo, estudios sugieren un mayor riesgo de infecciones en el sitio quirúrgico, aunque los datos son contradictorios.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el efecto en los niveles del fármaco vedolizumab, en resultados postoperatorios de pacientes sometidos a cirugía mayor abdominal, por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Pacientes intervenidos por un solo cirujano en un centro médico académico.PACIENTES:Un total de 72 pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal sometidos a cirugía mayor abdominal.INTERVENCIONES:Exposición preoperatoria a vedolizumab.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Morbilidad postoperatoria en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, con niveles detectables versus no detectables de vedolizumab.RESULTADOS:Se incluyó en el estudio a un total de 72 pacientes. Treinta y ocho pacientes tuvieron niveles detectables de vedolizumab (> 1,6 mcg / ml) y 34 con niveles no detectables de vedolizumab. La tasa global de complicaciones fue del 39% y el íleo fue la complicación más común. No hubo diferencias significativas en las variables clínicas entre los grupos de pacientes con niveles detectables y no detectables de vedolizumab, excepto por el intervalo de tiempo entre la última dosis y la cirugía (p <.01). La cohorte de colitis ulcerosa tuvo 42 pacientes, el 48% con un nivel no detectable de vedolizumab y el 52% un nivel detectable de vedolizumab. No hubo diferencias en ninguna morbilidad postoperatoria entre los grupos de colitis ulcerosa. La cohorte de Crohn tuvo 27 pacientes, 48% con niveles no detectables de vedolizumab y el 52% con niveles detectables de vedolizumab. Hubo una incidencia significativamente menor de íleo postoperatorio en pacientes de Crohn con niveles detectables de vedolizumab, comparados con los pacientes con un nivel no detectable de vedolizumab (p <0,04).LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones incluyen una baja población general de pacientes y una alta tasa de formación de estomas.CONCLUSIONES:Los niveles séricos de vedolizumab no influyen en la morbilidad postoperatoria de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Vedolizumab puede reducir la incidencia de íleo postoperatorio en pacientes de Crohn. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B574.

The Impact of Vedolizumab on COVID-19 Outcomes Among Adult IBD Patients in the SECURE-IBD Registry.

BackgroundThe impact of immune-modifying therapies on outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] is variable. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of vedolizumab [VDZ], a gut-selective anti-integrin, on COVID-19 outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients.MethodsUsing data from the Surveillance of Coronavirus Under Research Exclusion for IBD [SECURE-IBD], an international registry of IBD patients with confirmed COVID-19, we studied the impact of VDZ on COVID-19 hospitalization and severe COVID-19 [intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation and/or death].ResultsOf 3647 adult patients on any IBD medication in the registry, 457 [12.5%] patients were on VDZ. On multivariable analyses using backward selection of covariates, VDZ use was not associated with hospitalization or severe COVID-19 when compared with patients on all other medications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71, 1.1 and aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.53, 1.73, respectively). On comparing VDZ monotherapy to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] monotherapy, the odds for hospitalization, but not severe COVID-19, were higher [aOR CI 1.39; 95% CI 1.001, 1.90 and aOR 2.92; 95% CI 0.98, 8.71, respectively]. In an exploratory analysis, VDZ monotherapy, compared to anti-TNF monotherapy, was associated with new-onset gastrointestinal symptoms at the time of COVID-19, especially among patients whose IBD was in remission.ConclusionsCOVID-19 outcomes among IBD patients on VDZ are comparable to those on all other therapies. Hospitalization, but not severe COVID-19, is more likely with VDZ monotherapy than with anti-TNF monotherapy. Overall, VDZ appears to be safe in IBD patients with COVID-19.

GLP-1 Based Therapies and Disease Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: The disease course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) following treatment with glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 based therapies is unclear. Objectives: To examine clinical outcomes of IBD in patients with IBD and type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 based therapies compared with treatment with other antidiabetics. Methods: Using nationwide Danish registries, we identified patients with IBD and type 2 diabetes who received antidiabetic treatment between 1 January 2007 and 31 March 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of the need for oral corticosteroids, tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors, IBD-related hospitalisation, or IBD-related surgery. In the setting of a new-user active comparator design, we used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors with other antidiabetic therapies. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, IBD severity, and metformin use. Results: We identified 3751 patients with a diagnosis of IBD and type 2 diabetes and with a prescription of an antidiabetic drug (GLP-1 receptor agonists/DPP-4 inhibitors: 982 patients; other antidiabetic treatment: 2769 patients). The adjusted IRR of the composite outcome was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42-0.65) for patients exposed to GLP-1 receptor agonists/DPP-4 inhibitors compared with patients exposed to other antidiabetics. Conclusion: In patients with IBD and type 2 diabetes, treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists/DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with a lower risk of adverse clinical events compared with treatment with other antidiabetics. Funding Information: The study was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation [grant number NNF16OC0022586 and NNF17OC0029768]. Declaration of Interests: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency, and data were analysed on a secure research server at the Danish Health Data Authority. In Denmark, ethical approval is not required for research using pre-existing, routinely collected data.

Medication adherence and complementary therapy usage in inflammatory bowel disease patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Background and AimMedication nonadherence is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and has been associated with worse outcomes. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic led to significant consumer and medical concern regarding the possible risks of immunosuppressive medications during the pandemic. This study aimed to examine medication adherence and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage during the COVID‐19 pandemic.MethodsAn online survey was sent to patients from two tertiary IBD units. The survey included medication nonadherence attributed to the COVID‐19 pandemic, complementary therapy, and IBD medication use. Validated measures of IBD disease activity, medication adherence, and beliefs about medicines were obtained.ResultsOf 262 respondents (median age of 46, 58% female) 14 (5%) patients reported self‐initiated missed doses or dose reduction of IBD medications directly attributed to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Positive associations with medication nonadherence included current corticosteroid requirement (P = 0.022), higher disease activity scores (P = 0.026), and higher concern about medicines score (P = 0.04). CAM usage was common, aimed at treating mental health in most cases, and infrequently attributed to the COVID‐19 pandemic.ConclusionsEven in the setting of low COVID‐19 prevalence, the pandemic reduced IBD medication adherence in 1 in 20 patients. This reduced adherence was co‐associated with increased disease activity and corticosteroid use. Understanding the underlying beliefs driving suboptimal IBD medication adherence is critical to prevent avoidable adverse IBD outcomes.

The 25(OH)D3, but Not 1,25(OH)2D3 Levels Are Elevated in IBD Patients Regardless of Vitamin D Supplementation and Do Not Associate with Pain Severity or Frequency.

Due to its immunomodulatory effect, vitamin D has been associated with clinical parameters and outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) which are chronic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Upon synthesis or digestion, vitamin D is metabolized in the liver to form 25(OH)D3, the major circulating metabolite. Further renal hydroxylation generates 1,25(OH)2D3, the most potent metabolite. Our aim was to examine the association between vitamin D levels, and its supplementation and pain intensity in 39 IBD patients and 33 healthy individuals. 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 serum levels were measured. Each subject filled out visual analog scale (VAS) and Laitinen’s pain assessment scales. Laboratory results were obtained, and disease activity was assessed. Linear regression was employed to investigate the correlation between 25(OH)D3, 1,25(OH)2D3 and pain intensity, clinical activity parameters, C-reactive protein, disease duration, and dietary habits. In IBD patients, 25(OH)D3 was increased, whereas 1,25(OH)2D3 was not. Vitamin D3 supplementation did not influence their levels. No correlation was found between pain scores, disease activity, inflammatory status, disease duration or dietary habits and both forms of vitamin D. Elevated 25(OH)D3 and normal 1,25(OH)D3 were found in IBD patients as compared to the controls. We discovered no effect from supplementation and no association between pain severity and vitamin D.

Expression profile of the matricellular protein periostin in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease

The precise role of periostin, an extra-cellular matrix protein, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unclear. Here, we investigated periostin in paediatric IBD including its relationship with disease activity, clinical outcomes, genomic variation and expression in the colonic tissue. Plasma periostin was analysed using ELISA in 144 paediatric patients and 38 controls. Plasma levels were assessed against validated disease activity indices in IBD and clinical outcomes. An immuno-fluorescence for periostin and detailed isoform-expression analysis in the colonic tissue was performed in 23 individuals. We integrated a whole-gene based burden metric ‘GenePy’ to assess the impact of variation in POSTN and 23 other genes functionally connected to periostin. We found that plasma periostin levels were significantly increased during remission compared to active Crohn’s disease. The immuno-fluorescence analysis demonstrated enhanced peri-cryptal ring patterns in patients compared to controls, present throughout inflamed, as well as macroscopically non-inflamed colonic tissue. Interestingly, the pattern of isoforms remained unchanged during bowel inflammation compared to healthy controls. In addition to its role during the inflammatory processes in IBD, periostin may have an additional prominent role in mucosal repair. Additional studies will be necessary to understand its role in the pathogenesis, repair and fibrosis in IBD.

Patient-Evaluated Quality of Care is Related to Better Inflammatory Bowel Disease Outcomes: The IQCARO II Project.

Measuring quality of care (QoC) from a patient's perspective is becoming increasingly important in inflammatory bowel disease. The objective of this study was to determine whether patients' evaluations of QoC correlate with better inflammatory bowel disease outcomes. A survey including patients' characteristics, a decalogue of QoC indicators, and self-reported disease outcomes was completed by Spanish patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A QoC index (QoCI) was constructed with the sum of the "yes" answers in the decalogue. We evaluated the correlation of QoCI with outcomes. A sub-analysis comparing patients with high QoCI vs those with low QoCI was performed (QoCI = 10 or ≤ 7). Seven hundred and eighty-eight questionnaires were analyzed. Mean age of participants was 43.4 years (63% women). Mean QoCI was 8.1 (± 2.4). The QoCI correlated significantly with activity of the disease, number of flares, emergency/unscheduled visits, and disease control. Patients scoring in the first QoCI quartile reported a decreased rate of moderate/severe disease (34.8% vs 55.3%, p < 0.001), fewer numbers of flares (p < 0.001), and fewer emergency/unscheduled visits (p < 0.001) compared with those in the lower QoCI quartile. The high QoC group also reported better disease control. Patient-evaluated QoC correlates with better outcomes. Evaluation of QoC by patients may be useful to detect inadequate care and improve inflammatory bowel disease outcomes.

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring is more effective than conventional management in inducing fecal calprotectin remission in inflammatory bowel disease.

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (pTDM) may improve treatment outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease. We compared 135 patients following a prospective pTDM protocol aiming at an infliximab trough level (IFXTL) between 5 and 10 μg/ml with sequential measurements of Fc, with 108 patients from a retrospective group under conventional management. We evaluated the rates of Fc remission (<250 μg/g) and other clinical outcomes at 2-year of follow-up. pTDM associated with higher rates of Fc remission (69.6% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.002), and steroid-free clinical remission (78.4% vs. 55.2%, P = 0.028) with a trend for clinical remission (79.3% vs. 68.5%, P = 0.075). There was no difference in treatment discontinuation (P = 0.195), hospitalization (P = 0.156), and surgery (P = 0.110). Higher IFXTL associated with Fc remission at week 14 (6.59 vs. 2.96 μg/ml, P < 0.001), and at the end of follow-up (8.10 vs. 5.03 μg/ml, P = 0.001). In patients reaching Fc remission after week 14, IFXTL increased from week 14 to the end of follow-up (2.71 vs. 8.54 μg/ml, P < 0.001). Fc remission associated with higher rates of clinical (85.8% vs. 56.8% P < 0.001) and steroid-free clinical remission (86.9% vs. 50.0% P < 0.001), lower IFX discontinuation (8.8% vs. 36.8%, P < 0.001), and hospitalization (13.5% vs. 33.7%, P < 0.001), without significance for surgery (6.1% vs. 12.6%, P = 0.101). pTDM was more effective than conventional management in inducing Fc remission which was associated with improved outcomes.

Repeated Fecal Microbial Transplantations and Antibiotic Pre-Treatment Are Linked to Improved Clinical Response and Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Proportion Meta-Analysis.

The response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) has been inconsistent possibly due to variable engraftment of donor microbiota. This failure to engraft has resulted in the use of several different strategies to attempt optimization of the recipient microbiota following FMT. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of two distinct microbial strategies—antibiotic pre-treatment and repeated FMT dosing—on IBD outcomes. A systematic literature review was designed and implemented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A medical librarian conducted comprehensive searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library on 25 November 2019 and updated on 29 January 2021. Primary outcomes of interest included comparing relapse and remission rates in patients with IBD for a single FMT dose, repeated FMT dosages, and antibiotic pre-treatment groups. Twenty-eight articles (six randomized trials, 20 cohort trials, two case series) containing 976 patients were identified. Meta-analysis revealed that both repeated FMT and antibiotic pre-treatment strategies demonstrated improvements in pooled response and remission rates. These clinical improvements were associated with increases in fecal microbiota richness and α-diversity, as well as the enrichment of several short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing anaerobes including Bifidobacterium, Roseburia, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Ruminococcus, and Clostridium related species.

Elective surgery outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: interpretation at magnetic resonance enterography

Inflammatory bowel diseases include pathologic intestinal conditions of unknown etiology, such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Crohn's disease consists in a chronic transmural inflammation that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract and whose clinical course is characterized by a fluctuation of remission and recurrences, while inflammation in ulcerative colitis involves the solely layer of colonic mucosa. Cross-sectional imaging, and especially magnetic resonance enterography, is able to provide useful information about small bowel lesions as well as intestinal and extra-intestinal complications.However, morphological changes due to surgery can significantly impair the evaluation of small and large bowel, especially considering that the majority of CD patients undergo one or more surgical operations during their lifetime. Therefore, the aim of this work is to summarize the main surgical approaches in inflammatory bowel disease patients and the consequent findings on magnetic resonance enterography.

Sarcopenia is a Predictor for Adverse Clinical Outcome in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a high impact on nutritional status. Sarcopenia is related to higher risk of surgery and rescue therapy in adults with IBD; however, comparable data in pediatric populations are scarce. We evaluated muscle mass as a predictor of disease outcome in pediatric IBD. All pediatric IBD patients who underwent magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) during 2008 to 2019 were included. Muscle mass was assessed by measuring the area of the psoas muscle at the upper level of L3 on MRE. The psoas area divided by the body surface area (BSA) yielded the psoas index. Clinical and radiological data, including disease location, activity, course, and medications were documented. The control group included non-IBD children who underwent an MR imaging study. We enrolled 101 IBD patients, 69 (68.3%) with Crohn disease (CD) and 32 (31.7%) with ulcerative colitis (UC) (mean age 15.03 ± 3.27 years). The psoas index was significantly lower in the IBD patients compared with the 87 controls (326 vs 528, respectively, P < 0.001). Patients with a psoas index in the lowest quartile had significantly higher risk for biologic therapy (multivariate analysis, hazard ratio [HR] = 12.1, P = 0.046) and disease exacerbation (HR = 9, P = 0.047) independently of body mass index, compared with patients with a psoas index in the uppermost quartile. Sarcopenia correlates with the radiological severity of pediatric IBD and serves as a predictor for adverse clinical disease outcome. Muscle mass measurement in MRE studies may serve as a possible marker for disease outcome in this population.

Age at Diagnosis Is Determinant for the Outcome of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Is It a Myth?

INTRODUCTION:Patients with elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease were previously associated with a less aggressive course of the disease. However, there are conflicting data that need further validation. We aimed to determine the association between age at diagnosis and the development of progressive disease in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).METHODS:This cohort study included patients with CD and UC followed in 6 secondary and tertiary care centers in mainland Portugal. Patients were divided into a derivation (80%) cohort and a validation (20%) cohort. The primary outcome was progressive disease. Logistic regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the areas under the curve (AUC) were performed. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.RESULTS:The derivation cohorts included 1245 patients with CD (68% with progressive disease) and 1210 patients with UC (37% with progressive disease), whereas the validation cohorts included 302 patients with CD and 271 patients with UC, respectively, with similar outcome proportions. In our final model, age at diagnosis older than 60 years was significantly associated with a lower risk of developing progressive disease (odds ratio 0.390, 95% CI 0.164–0.923, P = 0.032), with a high discriminative power (AUC 0.724, 95% CI 0.693–754) in patients with CD. However, according to this model, no significant associations were found between age at diagnosis and the risk of developing progressive disease in patients with UC. No differences were observed in the AUC values between the validation and the derivation cohorts.DISCUSSION:Patients with elderly-onset CD, but not patients with UC, were associated with a less progressive course of the disease.

IMPACT OF TIME-TO-TEST FOR CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTION ON LENGTH OF STAY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED WITH FLARE

Guidelines recommend testing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients hospitalized with flare for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), though little is known about whether a delay in testing for CDI is related to adverse outcomes. We examined the relationship between time-to-C. difficile PCR test order, collection, and result with adverse IBD outcomes.

Chronic opioid use is associated with early biologic discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease.

Chronic opioid use is associated with poorer clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease. To investigate an association between chronic opioid use and persistence with biologic agents in management of inflammatory bowel disease. A total of 16624 patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease and receiving a first-time biologic prescription from 2011 to 2016 were identified retrospectively from the Truven MarketScan Database. A cohort of 1768 patients were identified as chronic opioid users utilising outpatient prescription claims. Utilisation patterns of biologic therapies were assessed from inpatient administration and outpatient claims data, including persistence calculations. Information on healthcare utilisation and common comorbidities was also collected. A Cox regression model was constructed to assess the hazard of chronic opioid use on early discontinuation of biologic therapy controlling for disease severity. A mean 1.5 different biologic agents were utilised by inflammatory bowel disease patients with chronic opioid use (vs 1.37 in the comparator group; P<0.0001). A lower proportion of the chronic opioid use cohort persisted on biologic therapies to the end of the study period (16.2% vs 33.5% P<0.0001). Inflammatory bowel disease patients with chronic opioid use utilised more healthcare resources and had a higher rate of comorbidities than the reference cohort. Patients with chronic opioid use were 23% more likely (hazard ratio 1.23; 95% CI [1.16-1.31]) to be non-persistent with biologic therapy while accounting for relevant markers of disease acuity. Chronic opioid use is associated with increased hazard of biologic discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease. Symptoms of opioid withdrawal may mimic IBD flares thereby leading providers to inappropriately switch biologic therapies and compromise disease control.

NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF NAFLD ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN IBD PATIENTS

Abstract Background Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the fastest growing cause of chronic liver disease among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Studies have suggested that patients with IBD develop NAFLD with fewer metabolic risk factors than those without IBD. Data have also suggested associations between NAFLD and factors inherent to IBD such as disease activity, disease duration, and prior IBD surgery. Despite this complex relationship, the impact of NAFLD on clinical outcomes in IBD patients has not been examined on a large scale. Methods We performed a propensity-score matched study among hospitalized IBD patients using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016–2017. ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients with IBD, NAFLD, and comorbidities. Patients with NAFLD were matched to those without NAFLD based on the following variables: age, sex, IBD type, metabolic syndrome (MS), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Cox regression was used to evaluate the primary outcomes of interest: readmission and death. Linear regression was used to evaluate healthcare utilization, including length of stay (LOS) and cost of care (COC). Multivariable models accounted for matched variables and adjusted for hospital characteristics, source of payment, patient income, and elective status of admissions. Statistical analyses accounted for the complex survey design. Results The prevalence of NAFLD in all hospitalized Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) was 2.4% and 2.1%, respectively. After matching based on predetermined variables, 11,497 patients with CD and 6,120 patients with UC were included in our study. NAFLD was associated with a higher risk of readmission for both CD (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.93–2.12, p&amp;lt;0.001) and UC (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.63–2.25, p&amp;lt;0.001). No significant association was noted between NAFLD and death in CD (HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.86–2.94, p=0.141) or UC (HR 1.42, CI 0.68–2.97, p=0.35). For healthcare utilization, NAFLD was associated with a longer LOS by 0.69 days (95% CI 0.25–1.13 days, p=0.002) and 0.82 days (95% CI 0.31–1.32 days, p=0.002) in CD and UC respectively. Additionally, NAFLD was associated with a $7,322 higher COC (95% CI $2,295–12,349, p&amp;lt;0.01) in CD and $11,272 (95% CI $4,155–18,388, p=0.02) in UC. Conclusions NAFLD is associated with higher readmission rates, longer lengths of stay, and higher costs of care in IBD patients. Identification and management of metabolic factors should be considered in the care of patients with IBD and future research should elucidate the roles of non-metabolic factors in the development of NAFLD, given the large impact of NAFLD on clinical outcomes in IBD.

IMPACT OF TIME-TO-TEST FOR CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTION ON LENGTH OF STAY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED WITH FLARE

Abstract Background Guidelines recommend testing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients hospitalized with flare for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), though little is known about whether a delay in testing for CDI is related to adverse outcomes. We examined the relationship between time-to-C. difficile PCR test order, collection, and result with adverse IBD outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of IBD patients hospitalized with flare through the emergency department (ED) between 2013 and 2020 at an urban academic medical center. The time from ED presentation to C. difficile test order (time-to-order), sample collection (time-to-collection), and test result (time-to-result) were collected. Time-to-result was stratified by within 6 hours, 6–24 hours, and 24 hours or longer. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were inpatient anti-TNF administration and surgery. We used hemodynamic and laboratory values at presentation to evaluate disease severity as a confounding variable between length of stay and time-dependent variables. Results We identified 122 IBD patients hospitalized with flare. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among time-to-result groups. Despite a shorter time-to-result, the average LOS in the 6 hours group was 7.3 days, longer compared to the 6–24 hours group (4.3 days, p=0.018) and the 24 hours group (4.2 days, p=0.035; Table 1). There were no differences in inpatient anti-TNF administration (p=0.10) or surgery (p=0.08) among time-to-result groups. The markers of disease severity that correlated with longer LOS were C-reactive protein (CRP) (0.28 days, p=0.003), heart rate (0.478 days, p&amp;lt;0.001), diastolic hypotension (0.228 days, p=0.01), and hypoalbuminemia (0.215 days, p=0.02). Higher CRP correlated with earlier time-to-result (-0.218 hours, p=0.02). Patients with more markers of disease severity had earlier times-to-result (12.8 hours vs. 32.2 hours, p=0.014) and had a longer LOS (7.9 vs. 3.4 days, p=0.007) (Table 2). Patients with more severe disease had an earlier time-to-order (4.48 hours) compared to those with less severe disease (17.4 hours), though this difference did not meet statistical significance (p=0.09; Table 2). Conclusion Earlier time-to-result for CDI is associated with longer LOS in IBD patients hospitalized with flare. This inverse relationship is confounded by disease severity at presentation: patients with more severe disease have a shorter time-to-result and a longer LOS. It may be that these patients produce a stool sample more readily; however, the near significance of differences in time-to-order among severity groups suggest a role for provider bias, which must be studied further. Delay in testing was not associated with higher rates of inpatient anti-TNF administration or surgery.